Goods Movement COLLABORATIVE AND PLAN. Arthur L. Dao, Alameda CTC Executive Director ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION. September 17, 2015

Similar documents
Regional Goods Movement Planning in the Bay Area

Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce, 08/05/14

FTP/SIS Steering Committee Work Plan and PPI Update

GREATER CHARLOTTE REGIONAL FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN

PROJECTS. The KIPDA MPO s Central Location

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION PLAN. Public Meeting Round 1

Travel Time Index: Why All the Fuss? Tim Lomax Texas A&M Transportation Institute

THE PROJECT. Executive Summary. City of Industry. City of Diamond Bar. 57/60 Confluence.

Stockton Freight & Passenger Rail Mobility Enhancement

Rail Strategy Study. ACTAC October 9, 2017

2017 Freight System Plan

WTP Phase 2 Implementation & Freight System Plan

Presentation to the Streets and Freeways Subcommittee

Technical Memorandum 3 Executive Summary Existing Conditions and Constraints Presentation. March 22, 2006

Truck Management ` Strategies in Los Angeles

Welcome. Greater Charlotte Regional Freight Mobility Plan Steering Committee Kick off Meeting #1

Chapter 1 Introduction

Richard Clarke Executive Director Program Management. Capital Program Management

NC State Freight Plan

Contra Costa Transportation Authority STAFF REPORT February 15, 2017 Page 2 of 3 Background MTC is expected to seek authorization from the State Legis

NEVADA STATE FREIGHT PLAN

- UPDATE - Development of the California Sustainable Freight Action Plan

Driving Our Ports Toward Greater Efficiency Gene Seroka, Executive Director Port of Los Angeles

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. ACEforward Notice of Additional Project Element Niles Junction Connections

Truck Modeling and Data Overview. June 14, 2017

2017 Freight System Plan

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN 2017

MAP 21 Interim Guidance. State Freight Advisory Committee & State Freight Plan

Database and Travel Demand Model

Chapter 5. Congestion Management Program. Chapter 5

State Route 710 North Environmental Study Update Online Media Briefing July 12, 2013

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: DRAFT KEY POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS

WELCOME. Central Coast Terminal Development Plans. Top 5 Things to Know about the Plan

Neal Campbell (WSDOT) Mike Dahlem (City of Sumner) Kirk Wilcox (Parametrix)

I-880 Integrated Corridor Management: Building on Existing Planning Efforts

Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan

Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

Overview of the Draft Highway Primary Freight Network. November 20, :00 2:30 pm ET Coral Torres Ed Strocko

Challenges and Opportunities for Canada s Freight Railways

6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS

The Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Public Meetings February 2016

Transportation 2040 Toward a Sustainable Transportation System. Toward a Sustainable Transportation System. Sultan Planning Board.

Alameda Countywide Transportation Plan Update Evaluation Outcomes

TRANSPORTATION PLAN Donald Vary

NEW YORK TRANSPORTATION FACTS ECONOMIC IMPACTS

Rail Industry Overview and Trends

Economic Perspective PACIFIC RIM TRADE

2060 Florida Transportation Plan

Airports in the Region Case Study

CORE MPO Freight Transportation Plan. Project Advisory Committee December 3, 2014

Sunrise Project South I-205 Corridor Improvement Project

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Study Introduction and Overview

NALEO ANNUAL CONFERENCE JUNE 24, Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Southern California Association of Governments

Report to Governor-elect Northam From Transition Policy Council on Transportation

FHWA Programs Supporting Freight

Capitol Corridor Vision Implementation Plan Vision for the Megaregion. CCJPA November 2017

THE RECOMMENDED PLAN THE KEY COMPONENTS

ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION Jim Frazier, Chair SB 595 (Beall) As Amended July 3, 2017

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment Western Mountain Corridor (L)

I-580 Interregional Multi-Modal Corridor Study

Hartford Area ITS Architecture. Stakeholder Meetings March 2004

GULF COAST RAIL DISTRICT VISION FOR REGIONAL RAIL

Central Valley Rail Working Group 1. INTRODUCTIONS

SCS Scenario Planning

Final Congestion Management Process

Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAC August 2, 2017

The Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Public Meetings January 2016

Miami River Freight Improvement Plan Financial Management Number:

CHAPTER 2.0: INTRODUCTION

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

Massachusetts Rail Plan. September 16, 2010

Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAB September 20, 2017

MAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports

Corridor Planning Organizations and Ports I-95 Corridor: A Marine Highway Corridor

Transportation Advisory Board May 21, 2014

Portland Area Mainline Needs Assessment Study

MOBILITY 2045: A FOCUS ON TRANSPORTATION CHOICE:

Texas Freight Mobility Plan. Chapter 1: Introduction

2017 TRANSPORTATION POLICY STATEMENT

Coalition for America s Gateways and Trade Corridors

P2 WORKSHOP ON FREIGHT MODAL COMPETITIVENESS. Authors: Michail Xyntarakis Aswani Yeraguntla Sudeshna Sen Jolanda Prozzi Chandra Bhat

The Level of Service Metric and. Alternatives for Multi-Modal Transportation. in Oakland

Virginia Critical Rural and Urban Freight Corridor Designation WebEx Discussion. September 28, 2017, 10:30 12:00

The U.S. Freight Railroad Industry. Ohio Conference on Freight Toledo, Ohio September 21, 2011

Economic Development Planning, Summary 30

Update and Status Report for the Comprehensive Transportation Plan. December 2, 2011

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. for improving the efficiency, mobility, reliability, and safety of this critical transportation corridor.

Transportation Toward a Sustainable Transportation System Regional Freight Strategy AAPA MARITIME ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP, Tacoma, WA

California State Rail Plan. Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission November 2, 2017

SR 417 Extension. June 2003 INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY PROJECT SCOPE AND PURPOSE STUDY OBJECTIVE STUDY PHASES

Union Pacific in Houston: Investing to Meet Freight Demands. Brenda Mainwaring, VP Public Affairs, November 12, 2013

FACT SHEETS LOS ANGELES COUNTY

Developing New Revenue Streams For Transit

Chapter 3 - Goals, Objectives, & Strategies

FDOT FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASURES

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

Importance of Railroad,Trucking, and Warehousing Data in Public Sector Decision Making

Southern California Leadership Council POSITION PAPER

Transcription:

ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Goods Movement COLLABORATIVE AND PLAN A presentation to the California Marine Affairs and Navigation Conference Arthur L. Dao, Alameda CTC Executive Director 1 September 17, 2015

Alameda County Transportation Commission Agency Overview Congestion Management Agency: provide transportation planning and programming funds created by State legislation County transportation sales tax administrator: Measure B and Measure BB sales tax programs implementation $8 billion over the next 30 years approved by Alameda County voters Vehicle Registration Fee program administrator: $10 million annually Express Lanes operator: I-580 and I-680 Manage and deliver major capital projects: $2.5 billion in current construction contract value GOODS Governed MOVEMENT COLLABORATIVE by a 22-member AND GOODS MOVEMENT Commission: PLAN all elected officials Agency run by 22 staff and a several consultant teams Annual operating and capital budget: ~ $320 million 2

Alameda County Snapshot Home to 1.5 million diverse residents; 2 nd most populous in the Bay Area; 7 th most in the State; one of 20 self-help counties Home of 20% of Bay Area population and 40% of all traffic congestion due to its central location in the region Home of five interstate freeways all on the National Primary Freight Network: I-580/I-238/I-880 truck corridor connecting to Port of Oakland; the Oakland International Airport Location of a significant network of Class I railroad lines that are shared with intercity passenger and commuter rail services Location of many diverse manufacturing and business centers Transit-rich transportation network (BART, AC Transit, Ferry, Rail, Trails, etc.) Home of prestigious national laboratories and universities 3

Why Are We Talking About Goods Movement? A major component of the County and region s economy and economic competitiveness 33 percent of jobs in Alameda County are in goods movementdependent industries a critical source of job diversity and well-paying jobs A major user of our transportation system and network A major infrastructure asset in the County and region We need to better understand gaps and needs, identify solutions and resources and make better investment choices to relieve traffic, improve mobility, gain economic competitiveness, improve the environment and create jobs Create a platform for building alliances and advocacy shortand long-term This conversation is overdue and needed now 4

Northern California Mega-Region Bay Area International trade hub Port of Oakland and SFO Fuels, agriculture and foods producer High value manufactured products Consumer center Sacramento Agricultural /food products domestic and exports Consumer center High value manufactured products Regional warehouse center Bay Area connection via Central Corridor (I-80 and UP rail) Central Coast Wine, fish and agricultural products domestic and exports Critical agricultural linkages with San Joaquin Valley San Joaquin Valley Agricultural and food products Regional distribution center for Bay Area and Sacramento Rail and interstate highway linkage Bay Area connections via Altamont Corridor (I-580, rail and barge) and SR 152 5 5

Goods Movement Flows in the Bay Area Source: FAF 3.5 Provisional Data and Forecasts. 6

Bay Area Freight Flows by Commodity 2011 $ in billions Articles-base metal, $14, 2% Other, $88, 14% Alcoholic beverages, $17, 3% Misc. mfg. prods., $18, 3% Electronics, $110, 17% Pharmaceuticals, $20, 3% Machinery, $82, 13% Textiles/leather, $23, 4% Mixed freight, $31, 5% Petroleum and Petroleum products, $81, 13% GOODS MOVEMENT COLLABORATIVE AND GOODS Motorized MOVEMENT PLAN Precision instruments, $38, vehicles, 6% Agriculture and $43, 7% food products, $63, 10% Total = $628B Source: Federal Highway Administration FAF3. 7

Alameda County Transportation Commission and Metropolitan Transportation Commission Goods Movement Collaborative and Goods Movement Plans Task 2013 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 2014 2015 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sep Oct 2016 Nov Dec Jan 1 Decision-Making and Outreach Kick-off workshop Needs Assessment workshop Strategy Evaluation workshop Advocacy workshop 2 Baseline Assessment A 3 Needs Assessment B 4 Develop and Evaluate Strategies C We are here 5 Goods Movement Plan D E 6 Coordination and Implementation Executive Team/Tech Team/Regional Advisory Group Meetings Stakeholder Roundtables (Broad and topic-based) Interest Group Meetings and Outreach ACTC Activity MTC Activity A Vision and Goals B Performance Measures C E Strategy Development D Strategy Evaluation Results Final Plans

Robust Stakeholder Engagement Executive Team High level guidance Commitment to implementation Technical Team Technical review On-ground knowledge Stakeholder Meetings Three rounds of interviews/focus groups System users, operators, labor and community/environmental groups Roundtables Convene all stakeholders together Platform for advocacy 9

Who We ve Talked To Trade unions Shippers/receivers Government agencies Business chambers/commerce Public health and community groups Carriers Railroads, aviation, maritime reps 10

Strategic Evaluation Process Develop Vision and Goals Develop Performance Measures and Metrics Assess Needs Based on System Performance Develop and Evaluate Candidate Strategies Using Performance Measures Identify Priority Opportunities Group Highly Ranked Strategies into Opportunity Packages 11

Goods Movement Infrastructure Global Gateways Handle international trade, and cover entry and exits points that are essential to moving imports/exports Port of Oakland and Oakland International Airport Interregional and Intraregional Corridors Link Alameda County and the Bay Area with rest of the U.S. Highways: I-880, I-580, I-238, I-80 and I-680 Railroads: Martinez (northern) and Niles/Oakland (southern) routes Local Streets and Roads Local streets and roads link global gateways and the interregional and intraregional corridors Last-mile connectors and arterial corridors 12

Assembling Priority Packages Groupings of high priority capital projects, programs and policies Capture synergies between projects Ensure balanced portfolio to achieve all goals Ensure equity and health considerations integrated with capacity expansion 13

Potential Programs/Projects to Address Needs in Alameda County Convert major truck freeway corridors (I-580/I-238/ I-880) to Smart Corridors Intelligent transportation system technology Integrated corridor mobility concept Reconstruct/upgrade existing freeway interchanges along truck corridors, especially along I-580, I-238, and segments of I-880 in the central part of the County Improve specific local roadways connecting to, and within the Port of Oakland, and ITS infrastructure at the Port 14

Potential Programs/Projects to Address Needs in Alameda County (cont d) Improve rail capacity and operational infrastructure on the Union Pacific Oakland, Niles and Martinez subdivisions to improve access between the Port of Oakland and the rest of the U.S. Improve Port of Oakland s infrastructure to improve access, truck circulation and transloading 7 th Street Grade Separation Internal roadways Truck parking facilities Fully-develop the former Oakland Army Base Zero-emission programs for trucks, trains and ships Community impact reduction programs 15

Potential Port of Oakland Investments 16

Next Steps Draft plans released Winter 2015 Final plans developed January 2016 Advocacy roundtable January 2016 17

Thank You 18