percent of the region's new employment in urban centers. 3 percent of the region's total households. transportation sector by 60 percent by 2035.

Similar documents
Who is DRCOG?

TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE

Calculating Mode Shift and Congestion Relief-Related Greenhouse Gas Displacement For the Current Year (see last slide for contact information)

Growth in the Fresno Metro Area

PROJECT NUMBER: CGC42761 Town of Amherst Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Zoning Code Revisions DRAFT Project Benefits Metrics Report (PBMR)

Performance Measures Workshop, May 18, 2017

Sustainability Metrics and Mapping Tool for Environmental Assessment of Rail Infrastructure in Illinois

Appendix C: Scenarios and Future Drivers Impacting Transportation

Environmental Assessment of Rail Infrastructure in Illinois

Base Information. 1. Project Title Hokestra Trail Realignment and Bridge Safety Improvements

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER CLIMATE ACTION PLAN

October 31, We would like to submit the following comments, on behalf of Conservation Colorado and the Southwest Energy Efficiency Project.

A Win/Win Strategy: Fixing Transportation and Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Massachusetts

Reducing CO2 and Energy Use Through Livable Communities: What s s Possible and Next Steps

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

A Connected Multimodal Region

Integrated Transportation Plan. TAC Meeting September 16, 2014

RURAL RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL RESIDENTIAL ALL COMMUNITIES

RURAL CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL CENTER ALL COMMUNITIES

Transit Land Use Multiplier Analysis: A Kentucky Example

Appendix L Greenhouse Gas 4-part Strategy

Quality of Life Study High Level Measures

DENVER REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 1290 BROADWAY, SUITE 100 DENVER, CO

Transportation and Utilities

Understanding AB 32 and SB 375 A Legal Analysis for Local Government Officials

Blueprint Denver Task Force Meeting #

Regional Performance Measures Annual Progress Report TPO Board - 2/4/2016 Presentation by: Chris Wichman, Senior Planner

DRAFT SCENARIOS DISCUSSION. A Presentation by Calthorpe Analytics June 18, 2015

Appendix E Technical Description of the Modeling Framework

DIVERSIFIED RURAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE DIVERSIFIED RURAL ALL COMMUNITIES

1560 Broadway, Suite 700, Denver, CO phone

Highest Priority Performance Measures for the TPP

LAND USE POLICIES BY COMMUNITY DESIGNATION

SUBURBAN EDGE COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES SUBURBAN EDGE

Base Information. 1. Project Title SH52 Planning & Environmental Linkages (PEL) Study

Transportation Planning and Climate Change

Climate Wise Data collection Reporting :: tracking :: benchmarking

Transportation. Sustainability Plan Transportation. Help Us Create a Sustainable Lakewood: Work Group Challenge. Topics. Vision

Increasing Ridership and Efficient Passenger Transit

The Future of Travel Demand

Vision, Goals, and Metrics

URBAN CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES URBAN CENTER

MODERNIZING TRANSPORTATION IN LOS ANGELES. City of Los Angeles Departments of City Planning & Transportation

TRB Webinar: U.S. Transportation System Scenarios to 2050 in a World Addressing Climate Change. September 10, 2009, 2:30 PM EDT

DRCOG s Land Use and Travel Demand Models. Presentation to the Institute of Transportation Engineers Colorado/Wyoming Section 12 December 2014

Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation

2040 Fiscally Constrained Regional Transportation Plan

Fresno Council of Governments. Sustainable Communities Strategy Scenarios

PSRC s 2018 Regional FTA Competition Project Evaluation Criteria

Appendix C: Greenhouse Gas Reduction Calculations

Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting #2 September 16, 2014 College Park, MD

Introduction. What are Capital Facilities and Why Do We Need to Plan for Them?

2040 Fiscally Constrained Regional Transportation Plan

Section 4.8 Climate Change

APPENDIX A - PLANS AND POLICY REVIEW FEBRUARY 2017

Expert Group Meeting. Beirut, 6 July Session 5: Experiences in ESCWA Region / Learned Lessons / Technology Transfer Needs

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

DuPage Energy and Emissions Profile

IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN

Lesson 2. Principles of. Transportation. Land Use 2-1

RTP-SCS Preferred Scenario. October 18,

Regional Benchmarks Measuring Our Progress

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory FY 11

Transportation A Conversation on Regional Transportation. Tacoma City Manager April 15, Update to the Regional Transportation Plan

Transit and Reducing Greenhouse Gases: A Look at the Numbers

Dear Board of County Commissioners, Mayor Flitner, and Town Councilors,

Rebound Effect: Overview and Recent Research. Joshua Linn NYU Transportation Workshop October 2011

Draft RSS - Targets Backgrounder

Vision, Goals, and Metrics. Draft

Congestion Management Process (CMP)

Transportation, Mobility and Access

Addendum 1: Performance Measures

Climate Action Planning

Policy Statement on State Legislative Issues for 2010

Policy Research CENTER

GOALS AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Vision California will

Transportation Category. New Location and. Green Vehicles. Reduced Parking Footprint. Bicycle Facilities. Access to Quality Transit

Explaining and Understanding Declines in U.S. CO 2 Emissions

City of Tacoma Community and Municipal Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Dan Marks, Director, Planning and Development

DIVISION 44 METROPOLITAN GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION TARGETS

Analysis of Options for Reducing Transportation Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic

This document has been developed to provide context to the Board as part of the strategic planning process. Regional development and travel trends

Transit Element of the 2035 Metro Vision Regional Transportation Plan

- FACT SHEET - THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES

AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS of the 2015 CLRP Amendment and the FY TIP

City of Pasadena Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory

INTEGRATING CLIMATE CHANGE INTO SCENARIO PLANNING: CAN EMISSION REDUCTION MEASURES ALSO MAKE A REGION MORE RESILIENT? 1

This presentation will: provide an overview of the Climate Smart Strategy adopted with broad support in the Portland region last December Describe

THE EL CERRITO CLIMATE ACTION PLAN. Reduction Targets City Council February 22, 2011

Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans

Metrolinx s GTHA Urban Freight Action Plan Peel Goods Movement Task Force

5.0 LONG-TERM CEQA CONSIDERATIONS

Scenario Planning in an Uncertain Future

Policy Statement on State Legislative Issues for 2012

Relevance of Climate Change to Transportation. Information Resources to Support Climate Change Initiatives: Experience of a State DOT

CITY OF SAN DIMAS GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY AND TECHNICAL SUPPORTING DATA

TRB Webinar: State and Local Government Responses to Climate Change

APPENDIX B: CITY OF RED LODGE BASELINE INVENTORY

Transcription:

Regional Snapshot: Metro Vision 2035 Goals Metro Vision 2035 was updated and adopted by the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) Board in February 2011 to include a focus on sustainability. The DRCOG Board defined sustainability for the Denver region by identifying a series of measurable goals the region should achieve by the year 2035. What follows is an overview of current progress toward achieving the goals detailed immediately below. Growth and Development Goals t Achieve a 10 percent increase in the region's overall density between 2000 and 2035. t Accommodate 50 percent of the region's new housing and 75 percent of the region's new employment in urban centers. t Limit the number of households in the semi-urban areas to 3 percent of the region's total households. Transportation Goals t Reduce the annual per capita greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector by 60 percent by 2035. t Reduce the percent of trips to work by single-occupancy vehicles (SOV) to 65 percent by 2035. t Reduce the daily per capita vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by 10 percent by 2035. t Increase the rate of construction of alternative transportation facilities. Environmental Goals t Protect a minimum of 880 square miles of parks and open space by 2035. Rev. June 2014 DENVER REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS We make life better!

Growth and Development Goals - Density The urban growth boundary/area (UGB/A) defines where urban development will take place in the region in the coming years. The UGB/A promotes an orderly, compact, and efficient pattern of future development in the region. Metro Vision 2035 defines the UGB/A as 980 square miles of urban development, which is intended to achieve at least a 10 percent increase in the region's overall density between 2000 and 2035. Current and Future Development in the Denver Region This map shows the Metro Vision 2035 980-square-mile UGB/A. UGA Urban Growth Area (UGA) communities map only a portion of their growth allocation. These communities plan an additional 65 square miles of urban development not shown on this map. Shifts in residential density within the UGB/A were analyzed to measure progress toward the goal. DRCOG's most recent inventory of residential structures includes buildings constructed in or before 2010. In looking back to 2000 the analysis relied on UGB/A limits established in previously adopted plans (i.e. 735 square miles in Metro Vision 2020). Between 2000 and 2010, residential density within the UGB/A increased by 5.3 percent. This suggests the region has made significant progress toward the established goal. Given the dominance of the multifamily housing sector in recent years, there is a very real possibility that the 5.3 percent figure based on 2000-2010 change is lower than if density change was measured using more current data. Density (Units/Square Miles) Residential Density 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Region-wide UGBA Location Residential, 2000 or older Residential, built up to 2010

Housing in Urban Centers Metro Vision 2035 describes urban centers as being mixed-use, more dense than surrounding areas, multimodal, and providing a range of housing options for people of all ages, incomes, and abilities. Urban centers have been an integral element of Metro Vision since the original Metro Vision Guiding Vision was adopted by the DRCOG Board in 1992. Metro Vision further establishes a goal of accommodating 50 percent of all new housing units and 75 percent of all new jobs in urban centers between 2005 and 2035. At the time of this analysis, there were 103 urban centers designated in Metro Vision. The combined land area of those centers is approximately 1 percent of the region's total land area. Urban Centers in the Denver Region 60% Percent of Housing Units Built in Urban Centers 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Urban centers designated in Metro Vision 2035 captured 21 percent of the region's housing growth between 2005 and 2010. While the share of housing growth in urban centers during that period is short of the 50 percent target set in Metro Vision, several trends may indicate positive progress toward the goal. t Between 2000 and 2004, less than 10 percent of all housing units built in the region were located in urban centers. t In 2009 and 2010, 40 percent of the housing units built were in urban centers. t As noted previously, the region has experienced significant multifamily construction in the past few years. Much of this activity is likely to have taken place in designated urban centers. Employment in Urban Centers Employment growth in urban centers is outpacing other areas of the DRCOG region. The region added 1 124,068 jobs, including both full-time and part-time workers between 2005 and 2013. Of these additional jobs, 55 percent were located in Employment in Urban Centers urban centers. The data do not indicate whether urban centers are attracting new jobs as the Metro Vision goal calls for. It's possible existing jobs within the region are relocating and concentrating in urban centers. Overall the data show that the region is making progress in reaching the Metro Vision goal. The chart at right shows the proportion of all jobs located in urban centers relative to the total number of jobs in the region. The bar at far right depicts the relationship of total jobs to jobs in urban centers if the region were to achieve the goal outlined in Metro Vision, accommodating 75 percent of job growth in urban centers (2005 2035). Jobs Area 2005 2013 Difference (2013-2005) DRCOG Region 1,288, 900 1,413,000 124,000 Percent of Growth Urban Centers 463,500 531,400 67,900 55% Non-Urban Centers 825,400 881,500 56,100 45% 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 Employment in the Denver Region, 2005-2035 Urban Centers Non-Urban Centers 0 2005 2013 2035 Year 1 Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, Quarter 2. This data records employees and firms, and does not include sole proprietors.

Semi-Urban Growth Target Metro Vision 2035 further establishes a goal of limiting the total households in semi-urban development in 2035 to 3 percent of the region's total households. This represents an amount equal to the estimated number of semi-urban households estimated to be present in the region in 2006. As defined in the Metro Vision 2035 Growth and Development Supplement, semi-urban development is residential subdivisions or groupings of 10 or more residential parcels with an average residential lot size Semi-Urban Development Outside the UGB/A Semi-Urban (NOT in the UGB/A) Square Miles Number of Housing Units 204 40,024 Region 5,290 1,126,500 greater than or equal to one acre and less than 10 acres. Metro Vision 2035 notes the importance of carefully planning semi-urban development to minimize its financial, environmental and visual impacts. Of the 1,126,500 housing units in the region in 2010, 40,020 or 3.5 percent were located in semi-urban areas beyond the UGB/A. This exceeds the target set in Metro Vision. The 3 percent target was established based on analysis completed in 2006. The 2006 analysis indicated data limitations may impact the accuracy of the original benchmark. In the intervening years DRCOG's parcel databases have improved and it's conceivable the 3 percent benchmark did not reflect an accurate accounting of the number of housing units in semi-urban areas in 2006. Transportation Goals Progress on Metro Vision 2035 Metro Vision 2035 includes four transportation-related goals: l increase the rate of construction of alternative transportation facilities, l reduce single-occupancy vehicle (SOV) mode share for work trips, l reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT), and l reduce greenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions per capita. These goals are interrelated and work in concert: when SOV trips are reduced, VMT per capita and GHG emissions per capita also decrease. While measuring progress on the GHG, SOV, and VMT goals is straightforward, there is no standard or accepted methodology for measuring the rate of construction for 2 alternative transportation facilities. Transportation Goals between 2005 and 2013 2013 * 71.3 2,947,800 24.2 The table at right provides yearly measurements for the three measurable goals. * 2013 SOV Mode Share % is not yet available from the Census. Baseline (2005) measures identified in the table will be different than baseline conditions identified in Metro Vision 2035 as new tools (including DRCOG's travel model) and techniques have been implemented and updated since the plan was adopted. Year SOV Mode Share % VMT millions/ day DRCOG Region Population VMT / Capita 2005 77.10% 67.5 2,727,900 24.7 2006 75.40% 69.3 2,755,200 25.1 2007 74.90% 69.1 2,782,700 24.8 2008 73.80% 69.1 2,810,200 24.5 2009 75.00% 69.2 2,837,700 24.3 2010 75.60% 70.0 2,865,200 24.4 2011 75.50% 69.0 2,892,800 23.8 2012 74.90% 69.8 2,920,300 23.9 2 FasTracks - one of the largest public transit rail programs in the country - continued construction including the completion of the West Line, Denver Union Station, as well as significant progress on the East Line, the Gold Line, and the US-36 BRT.

According to the Census' American Community Survey (ACS), SOV mode share for work trips dropped since 2005. Metro Vision set a goal of 65 percent by 2035, a reduction of 12.1 percentage points from the 2005 baseline. The year-to-year data show a drop that corresponds to the time period when gas prices spiked, which may have influenced household decision-making regarding if, when, and how to travel. SOV mode share increased in 2009, on the heels of record high gas prices in the summer of 2008, but started dropping again in 2011. However the decline was not as steep as was experienced between 2005 and 2008. The most recent decreases have occurred as unemployment rates have also decreased. Three major economic factors record high gas prices, a national recession, and the beginnings of an economic recovery -- had little impact on how people travel to work. SOV Mode Share Compared to SOV Mode Share Goal 80% 80% SOV Mode Share Goal 70% 70% 60% 60% 50% 50% 40% 40% 30% 30% SOV Mode Share SOV Mode Share Metro Vision SOV Mode Share Goal (65%) 20% 20% 10% 10% 0% 0% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Year Source: ACS, Census Metro Vision 2035 includes a goal of reducing daily per capita VMT by 10 percent. DRCOG's travel model estimates the baseline (2005) per capita figure to be 24.74 miles of travel per day. A 10 percent reduction would lower daily per capita VMT to 22.27 in 2035. The trend in per capita VMT has been generally downward since 2006. This downward trend is more pronounced than the slight downward trend of commuting via SOV.

VMT/Capita VMT Per Capita Compared to Goal VMT (10% reduction) 30 30 28 26 25 24 22 20 20 18 16 15 14 12 10 10 8 5 6 4 2 0 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Year VMT/Capita VMT/Capita Metro Vision VMT/Capita Goal (23.7%) Metro Vision 2035 establishes a goal of reducing GHG emissions from transportation by 60 percent by 2035. Between 2005 and 2010 the region achieved a 5 percent reduction. If the region were to continue that trajectory and reduce emissions by 5 percent every five years, the resulting GHGs would be 8,684 lbs (3.93 metric tons) per capita for a total reduction of 26.5 percent. While GHG emissions are decreasing on a per capita basis, to achieve the goal of a 60 percent reduction, significant advancements to lower emissions will be needed in the coming years. A key part of lowering emissions will be for people to switch to more fuel-efficient vehicles. New, federally mandated CAFÉ standards have been signed into law, requiring an increased fleet new car fuel efficiency of 54.5 miles per gallon for cars and light-duty trucks by model year 2025, which will assist greatly in achieving the goal. 2005-2010 Goal Progress 2005-2010 Goal Progress 2005 2010 Percent change from 2005 to 2010 Weekday VMT (mile) 67,481,300 70,022,400 3.8% DRCOG Region Population 2,727,900 2,865,200 5.0% Weekday GHG (pound) 92,707,600 92,471,500-0.3% Weekday GHG (pound) per capita 33.9 32.2-5.0% Annual GHG (pound) per capita = Weekday GHG*338 11,460 10,880-5.0%

Environmental Goals - Parks and Open Space The Denver region is home to many natural and recreational resources including the mountain backdrop, riparian corridors, and other key open space and wildlife habitats. Some examples of parks and open space include: agricultural lands; athletic fields; local, regional, and state parks; greenways; natural areas for wildlife; and reservoirs. Metro Vision 2035 recognizes that as our region grows we must take care to ensure our natural assets remain for generations to come. Metro Vision 2035 establishes a goal of protecting a minimum of 880 square miles of parks and open space by 2035. In 2013, DRCOG identified more than 770 square miles of parks and open space in the metro area, a significant increase from previous inventories. This recent inventory of protected lands suggests the region is well on its way to achieving the goal of protecting 880 square miles of parks and open space by 2035. 2013 2007 Parks and Open Space in the Denver Region 2004 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Square Miles Open Space in the Denver Region