The TAP TSI Legal Framework and implementation strategy

Similar documents
Kick-off meeting on TAF/TAP Master Plans

Kick-off meeting on TAF/TAP Master Plans

Draft. COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /..

TAP TSI Update and Masterplanning. Brussels 26 January TAF/ TAP Masterplanning kick-off 1

Railway Interoperability and Safety Committee. Working document

EU strategic scenario: white paper, ITS and railway Interoperability

3. OBJECTIVES PURSUED BY THIS WORK PROGRAMME AND THE FUNDING PRIORITIES:

UITP EU Committee Position on the ERA Draft Final Report. IU-ExtScope FinalReport. on the Extension of field of application of TSIs

Telematic Applications for Freight (TAF) Telematic Applications for Passengers (TAP)

"Step by Step" Guide to implement TAF TSI. Paris, 22/02/2016. ERA Telematics Team

TAP Phase one Minutes. Second meeting of the STEERING COMMITTEE 8 July 2011

The Content of TAF TSI: RU/IM Communication and Legal Obligations

INTEROPERABILITY UNIT

SIS Directory Accreditation number: SIS 0130

Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC & Role of European Railway Agency (ERA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

TSI OPERATION AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT FINAL REPORT ON THE MERGING OF CONVENTIONAL RAIL AND HIGH SPEED TSIS

INTEROPERABILITY UNIT

TAF TSI revision - recommendation Working Group on TELEMATICS in the transport of dangerous goods. Bordeaux,

Safety Regulation for Rail Sector in Europe

INTEROPERABILITY UNIT

INTEROPERABILITY UNIT

European Railway Agency SIAFI

Rolling stock approval process

M1 DIRECTIVE 2001/16/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 19 March 2001 on the interoperability of the conventional rail system

Towards an integrated European Railway Area

Telematic Applications for Freight (TAF TSI)

Draft working document

11 th UIC Railway Noise Workshop

ERA s view on Implementa3on of Telema3c TSIs

Rail Interoperability

Draft delegated act for the TSI revision

***I POSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Benefits of harmonized regulations for placing in service of railway equipment - European experiences. Peter Mihm Head of Technical Cooperation

European Data Economy

Guide for the application of Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSIs)

Impact of interoperability on the global railway network. L. Tordai, UIC, Paris, France

COMPARISON GLOSSARY TrainID (WG10/TG4), TAP/TAF IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE AND ERA. Page 1 van 38

Getting new trains on track

Boosting International Rail Freight. Sector Statement on Rail Freight Corridors

Uncovering the technical specifications for interoperability as determined by the ERA to harmonise European safety standards

THE TRANS-EUROPEAN HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM Guide for the application of the high-speed TSIs of Council Directive 96/48/EC

The European Framework for Vehicle Authorisation

The Voice of European Railways POSITION PAPER DOMESTIC PASSENGER MARKET OPENING IN THE CONTEXT OF THE 4RP. 18 September October 2009 Page 1/9

TAF1(2004)02 18 January 2005 Page 1 of 18. CEN/ISSS Workshop TAF. Business Plan

TAP Phase One Masterplan Report

INTEROPERABILITY UNIT COMPLEMENTARY STUDY INTERCHANGEABLE SPARE PARTS

OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY ERA/OPI/ QC-RST-015. European Railway Agency. Executive Director FOR

QUESTION / CLARIFICATION

A Digital Single European Railway Area. Kathrin Obst Unit B2-Single European Rail Area European Commission Directorate General Transport and Mobility

Telematics Governance and framework

DIRECTIVES. (Text with EEA relevance)

The content of TAF TSI - General Framework

1 Introduction. 2 Abbreviations and Definitions

TAF-TSI Preliminary Master Plan. 13 th May 2012

ANNEX A THE INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT FOR THE RAILWAY SECTOR

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Version 1.0. JSG Pilot Programme Governance Document

3. OBJECTIVES AND PRIORITIES:

Sector management of regulatory document changes STAR project deliverable 8

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

Further information on the legislation can be found in all EU languages on EUR-LEX website:

Assurance provided by a second pair eyes (RASBO) of the correct Safe integration by the proposer of a new or modified Rolling Stock

European Rail Infrastructure Managers Handbook for International Contingency Management

2015 CEF Transport Calls

1. Name, address, telephone and fax numbers, and Internet address of the European Railway Agency

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN 2014/2244(INI) on the implementation of multimodal integrated ticketing in the EU (2014/2244(INI))

DIRECTIVE (EU) 2016/798 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 11 May 2016 on railway safety (recast) (OJ L 138, , p.

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

COTIF in the framework of ESCAP. F. Davenne Bangkok September 2017

Strategic Direction for revised Infrastructure TSI. Issue 1.0

FSM. Full Service Model Initiative 1. Latest developement. Brussels. 4 June Full Service Model Initiative. Advisors

Ernest Godward, EU Agency for Railways. Rail Freight in the European Union

Telematics Applications for Freight Technical Specification for Interoperability

The 4 th Railway Package under negotiation: where do we stand?

ERA TSI OPE Working document

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

DISCUSSION PAPER ON ACCESS TO SERVICE FACILITIES AND RAIL RELATED SERVICES

RADIO SPECTRUM COMMITTEE

Action Plan RFC North Sea - Mediterranean

Activities in Regional & Suburban Railways. Mohamed Mezghani Director Programmes & Studies

EXCHANGE of FREIGHT WAGONS in EUROPE

The Voice of European Railways POSITION PAPER

QUESTION / CLARIFICATION

ORR guidance on the application of the common safety method (CSM) on risk evaluation and assessment

DECISIONS CONCERNING THE ACCOUNTS OF PROJECTS / ACTIVITIES FREIGHT

ERTMS the right investment for the future. EU Railway Conference Lille, 8 May 2014 Pio GUIDO, Head of ERTMS Unit

EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY

Work programme of the Committee of Technical Experts for 2011 and 2012

Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)

Common Safety Targets and Common Safety Methods for the railway systems in Europe

Biennial Report on the Progress with Railway Interoperability in the European Union

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. Session document

TSI OPERATION AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT, CONVENTIONAL RAIL SYSTEM FINAL REPORT ON THE REVISION

REDUCING THE OCCURRENCES AND IMPACT OF FREIGHT TRAIN DERAILMENTS. Results of the D-Rail project

An EU coordinated approach to R&I in the rail sector under H2020

Intermodality ESIGELEC - FRANCE

ANNEX C2 Assessment Procedures

RECOMMENDATIONS. (Text with EEA relevance) (2014/897/EU)

INDIRECT FULFILMENT IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE

Transcription:

Twelfth UIC ebusiness Conference - Passenger Workshop The TAP TSI Legal Framework and implementation strategy by Ugo Dell Arciprete Paris, 23 October 2008

TAP TECHNICAL STANDARDS INTEROPERABILITY COMPETITION TSI PASSENGER RIGHTS

Legal framework (1) Directive 2001/16 on interoperability Main target : improve the interlinking and interoperability of the national rail networks as well as access thereto Definition of Subsystems : (a) structural areas: infrastructure; energy; control and command and signalling; traffic operation and management; rolling stock; (b) operational areas: maintenance; telematics applications for passenger and freight services. Description of the Subsystem Telematic Applications for Passengers : "applications for passenger services, including systems providing passengers with information before and during the journey, reservation and payment systems, luggage management and management of connections between trains and with other modes of transport".

Legal framework (2) Art. 23 of Directive 2001/16 sets a priority order for the adoption of the TSIs The first ones (e.g. Telematic Applications for Freight - TAF, defined in Reg. 62/2006), have been defined by working groups of the Association Européenne pour l Intéroperabilité Ferroviaire (AEIF) In 2006 was created the European Rail Agency (ERA), as prescribed by the Reg. 881/2004, with the task among others of drafting the remaining TSIs On 9.2.2006 the European Commission gave to the ERA the mandate to draft the TAP TSI, allowing a time span of 36 months The mandate specifies that this TSI : o should take account of the latest development of the proposal on a Regulation on International Rail Passengers Rights and Obligations o should be the basis for the future evolution of the CRST (Computerised Information and Reservation System for Rail Transport)

Legal framework (3) The Passenger Rights Regulation (PRR) was published on the OJ of the EU on 3.12.2007 as Regulation 1371/2007, and will entry into force on 3.12.2009 Art. 10 states that The Commission shall adopt the TSI of telematics applications for passengers by 3 December 2010 Artt. 3 6 allow Member States to grant exemptions: NO exemption International rail passenger services (unless significant part outside the EU) Long distance domestic rail passenger services 5 years + 5 years + 5 years Regional Suburban Urban rail passenger services Unlimited exemption possible International Regional Suburban Urban?

Legal framework (4) Annex II of PRR defines the Minimum information to be provided by railway undertakings and/or by ticket vendors Part 1: Pre-journey information Accessibility, access conditions and availability on board of facilities for disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility Accessibility and access conditions for bicycles Availability of seats in smoking and non-smoking, first and second class as well as couchettes and sleeping carriages Any activities likely to disrupt or delay services Availability of on-board services Procedures for reclaiming lost luggage Procedures for the submission of complaints.

Legal framework (5) Part II: Information during the journey On-board services Next station Delays Main connecting services Security and safety issues"

Bodies working for the drafting of the TAP ERA Working Party ERA officers 3 CER Speakers other Speakers (EIM, UITP, ) UIC Sounding Board Common TAP Support Group 3 CER Speakers 2 UITP Speakers (*) other rail experts in: - Commercial - Operations - Infrastructure EIM, UITP, Support Groups Members of DSSG Members of Support Group Commercial Workshops RU/IM Workshops (*) EIM has withdrawn from the Common TAP Support Group

Common structure of all TSIs Chapter Title Drafted 1 Introduction 2 Definition of the Subsystem/Scope 3 Essential requirements 4 Characterisation of the Subsystem 5 Interoperability constituents 6 Assessment of conformity and/or suitability for use of the constituents and verification of the Subsystem 7 Implementation Annexes Chapters 4 (describing the functionalities to be implemented, called Basic Parameters, or BPs) and 7 (describing the implementation process) are the most important ones

Commercial BPs 1. Handling of timetable data 2. Handling of tariff data 3. Handling of information on products 4. Handling of conditions of carriage information 5. Handling of registered luggage 6. Handling of carriage of PRM 7. Handling of bikes 8. Handling of cars 9. Handling of availability/reservation 10. Handling of security elements for product distribution 11. Handling of fulfilment 12. Handling of information provision in station area 13. Handling of information provision in vehicle area RU / IM BPs 14. Train preparation 15. Train running forecast 16. Handling of short term timetable data Each BP contains one or more processes (elementary components of the BP s functionality). At present 41 processes are defined (small changes possible). A BP can be left as open point, when in that field there are no established European technical standards, nor UIC leaflets. In that case CEN will be required to develop such standards.

Main points agreed with ERA Minimize costs, making use whenever possible of processes already established Adoption of the UIC leaflets as minimum technical standard General info to the public (conditions of carriage, submission of complaints, ) published on RU s website in local language + English No obligation to inform the passenger about timetables of other RUs, but freedom for all RUs to do so Obligation to make available its own timetable to other RUs, international timetables harmonized by a central entity No obligation to sell anything or to let others sell anything, unless under distribution agreements No technical standards for domestic sales, only for international and foreign sales Obligation to inform the passenger about fastest trip and lowest fares (see PRR) limited to products sold by the RU Exchange of reservation messages in Hermes style (918-1) as default, additional protocols allowed on bi/multilateral agreement Dialogue RU/IM conform to TAF whenever possible

Use of the UIC leaflets (1) As mentioned, the UIC leaflets currently used in the processes relevant for TAP TSI will be used as basis for the technical standards. This has always been the intention of the ERA, but until recently it was not clear how to make reference to proprietary norms in a European law The Directive 2008/57, approved on 17 June 2008, finally stated that TSIs may make an explicit, clearly identified reference to European or international standards or specifications or technical documents published by the Agency where this is strictly necessary in order to achieve the objective of this Directive. In such case, these standards or specifications (or the relevant parts) or technical documents shall be regarded as annexes to the TSI concerned and shall become mandatory from the moment the TSI is applicable.

Use of the UIC leaflets (2) ERA is therefore negotiating with UIC a right of use of the needed leaflets, and a modus operandi for their update. The basic idea, in order to ensure an efficient, flexible and transparent updating of the ERA Technical Documents derived from the leaflets, is to setup an appropriate Change Control Management (CCM) Board, in a similar way to what has been done for ERTMS. The UIC technical groups will continue to study and propose amendments to the leaflets, as they do today. Before approving the amendments, the UIC will discuss them with the ERA within the CCM Board, and after agreement the amendments will be applied to both the UIC leaflets and the ERA technical documents.

Next steps (1) MS : Member State SDC : Social Dialogue Committee

Next steps (2) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Work of ERA WP Preliminary draft TAP TSI Member States, Social Dialogue Final draft TAP TSI Translation, Publication Adoption of the TSI until 3.12.2010 Strategic European Deployment Plan (SEDP) Implementation of TAP TSI

Strategic European Deployment Plan (1) The SEDP is the roadmap to realise the TAP TSI, it enables the project controlling during the realisation on European level The SEDP must support: the co-ordination, synchronisation and prioritisation within the sector the overall cost/benefit optimisation the protection of the individual stakeholders investment during implementation phase the progress monitoring on individual- and European-wide level Prerequisite to launch a SEDP is the definition of a commonly agreed TAP TSI Deployment Strategy Paper The purpose of this paper is to describe: - how the stakeholders will work together at European level to deliver the SEDP - the necessary steps to develop the SEDP and the various individual and joint deployment plans and their synchronisation

Strategic European Deployment Plan (2) Basics to define the SEDP Focus on cost/benefit optimisation Awareness of competition aspects Best in class solutions evaluation in other industries Protection of investments already done (e.g. Software components, processes) Integration/usage of existing European projects, initiatives Individual Stakeholders, having already realised process- and IT-solutions required to implement TAF TSI as well as TAP TSI, may sell the product to other stakeholders to speed up the realisation Common development of new functionalities, needed by a group of stakeholders, should be the first option, compared with individual development by every single stakeholder

Conclusions Long process, final results in 6 to 8 years, but basis are laid now In general good cooperation with ERA, positive decision to use UIC leaflets as standards Obligations for the RUs kept in this phase to a minimum Risk of worsening conditions introduced in further steps by political bodies (Commission, Member States, Social Dialogue Committee) need of lobby at CER level towards the Commission, and by all RUs towards Member States Need to start early reflections on the SEDP governance Need to monitor an efficient and effective deployment of the Change Control Management

Thanks for your kind attention, feel free to contact me for any additional question on TAP not solved during the Questions & Answers session: Ugo Dell Arciprete DSSG chairman and CER speaker for TAP TSI Tel: + 39 06 4410 6705 Fax: + 39 06 4410 4543 E-mail: u.dellarciprete@trenitalia.it