Chapter page 1

Similar documents
This is a draft revision of the briefing, and any comments are welcome please them to Becky Slater on

ABE 482 Environmental Engineering in Biosystems. September 29 Lecture 11

Biomass. The latter is not a new concept, homes and industries were, at one time, heated and powered by wood.

HOW PYROLYSIS WASTE TO ENERGY WORKS

Which Technologies. for SWM Treatment? By Eng. Anis ISMAIL Senior Environment and Solid Waste Specialist

Thermal Treatment. For more information, contact us: E :

Introduction: Thermal treatment

In the UK, the most common disposal method is landfill. Incineration, anaerobic digestion and other disposal methods are also used.

Pyrolysis and Gasification

GASIFICATION THE WASTE-TO-ENERGY SOLUTION SYNGAS WASTE STEAM CONSUMER PRODUCTS TRANSPORTATION FUELS HYDROGEN FOR OIL REFINING FERTILIZERS CHEMICALS

Incineration (energy recovery through complete oxidation) Mass Burn Refuse Derived Fuel Pyrolysis Gasification

Chapter 13. Thermal Conversion Technologies. Fundamentals of Thermal Processing

Mini converter carbons and wastes for Biogas production and Energy Cogeneration model «ПТК-52»

Sustainable Waste Diversion Technologies to promote a circular economy

Renewable Energy Technologies I. Exercise 10

Torrefaction, Pyrolysis, and Gasification- Thermal Processes for Resource Recovery and Biosolids Management

SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL A BURNING PROBLEM TO BE RESOLVED

MULTI-WASTE TREATMENT AND VALORISATION BY THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES. Francisco Corona Encinas M Sc.

City of Sydney Gasification Project

DEVELOPMENTS IN HARNESSING OF BIO-MASS POWER

Biomass Electricity. Megan Ziolkowski November 29, 2009

Waste-To-Energy New Technologies

GCE Environmental Technology. Energy from Biomass. For first teaching from September 2013 For first award in Summer 2014

ECN Research and Development in bioenergy

Chapter Five Waste Processing, Treatment and Recycling Joe Green Dr Chris Wooldridge Cardiff University

Anaerobic Digestion not just biogas production. FARM BIOGAS Methane consulting cc

WHY WASTE TO ENERGY (WTE)?

(c) Tertiary Further treatment may be used to remove more organic matter and/or disinfect the water.

Improved solutions for solid waste to energy conversion

BFB (bubbling fluidized bed) Power Plants (CHP) Fuel: RDF or Biomass CHP

Fuel preparation Phil White, MCIWM

Fossil, Biomass, and Synthetic Fuels

PLASMA GASIFICATION TECHNOLOGY FOR HAZADOUS WASTE. Waste2Tricity Internaltional (Thailand) Co., Ltd

NEW TECHNOLOGIES FOR WASTE PROCESSING - CONVERSION. NEWMOA Solid Waste Program Staff Workshop May 11, 2017

REALIZING RENEWABLE ENERGY POTENTIAL

Report for IEA Bioenergy Task 36 Topic 2

RESOURCES, OPPORTUNITIES AND IMPACTS FOR BIOENERGY DEVELOPMENT

Renewable Energy Systems

What is Bioenergy? William Robinson B9 Solutions Limited

Summary Report and Record of Durham College Information Session

The ARK Reformer. Animal Litter. Synthetic Crude Oil Synthesis Gas (SynGas) Fertilizer Biomass. Solid Waste. Waste to Fuel

Renewable gases : What are the challenges? François CAGNON CEDEC Gas DAY, February 18, 2013

EfW Outputs. Guidance on the management of energy outputs and residues including air pollution control residues and incinerator bottom ash

California Biomass Collaborative, 8 th Annual Forum

TECHNOLOGY. E-COMPANY Holding, s.e., Europe

Biomass to Energy Conversions -Thermochemical Processes-

Ottawa IWMMP Phase 2 Report on System Options for the Longer Term

WESTINGHOUSE PLASMA GASIFICATION. Hazardous Waste Management

PLASMA ARC THE LEADING LIGHT?

Study of the Conversion of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) into Liquid Fuel

ITI Energy Limited. A New Era in Gasification. Presentation to. UK Energy Symposium Nottingham

Debnath Pal Process Director Peter Brennan Project Director. Advanced Thermal Treatment; Technology Challenges Dr. Ben Herbert R&D Manager

Production from Organic Residues. Biogas

Competence building and technological perspectives for thermal biomass conversion in Norway

Environmental Advantages of Gasification: Public and Agency Awareness. Steve Jenkins Energy & Chemicals Consulting, LLC October 13, 2015

The Enerjetik RJ2 Gasifier. Do we finally have the right gasifying system for the Ceramic Industry?

How to Make Biomass to Energy Work in Rural Towns of Alaska

International Workshop on Bioenergy Policies, Technologies and Financing

Polyurethane. Polyurethane Recycling and Recovery. Options for Polyurethane Recycling and Recovery

COMPREHENSIVE MSW PROCESSING STEPS BIO COKE METHOD

Module 3b. Bioenergy end-use and applications

REPORT B. Stockholm, Sweden

8/4/2015. PHG Energy Means Industrial Grade. Chris Koczaja VP of Engineering and Implementation. Clean Energy Conversion.

Smart CHP from Biomass and Waste

Efficiency analysis for the production of modern energy carriers from renewable resources and wastes

OUTOTEC ENERGY SOLUTIONS BENEFITS

Thermal Conversion of Animal Manure to Biofuel. Outline. Biorefinery approaches

Hydrous pyrolysis of digestate as alternative to post composting in a biowaste anaerobic digestion facility

Research Needs on Pyrolysis and Gasification of Waste

COGENERATION PLANT FAQ. What is biomass cogeneration? Cogeneration is the simultaneous production of electricity and heat using a single primary fuel.

ENERGY GENERATION FROM WASTE. Fatih HOŞOĞLU Operations Manager Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality Istanbul Environmental Management Company

Technical overview and benefits

DESCRIPTION OF A SYSTEM THAT TRANSFORM S ORGANIC MATER IALS INTO SYNTETIC FUEL S

Pre-Processing of Municipal Solid Waste before Anaerobic Digestion - CAPEX and OPEX as model calculation

Research and Development Initiatives of WRI

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQS)

ENABLING SYNTHESIS OF BIOBASED CHEMICALS & FUELS

Pyrolysis of Low Grade Biomass and Waste

Author: Andrea Milioni Chemical Engineer On Contract Cooperator University UCBM Rome (Italy)

Best Available Techniques in Pyrolysis and Anaerobic Digestion. EBIMUN interregional meeting Tartu (Estonia) 29-30th September 2011 Julio Fierro

International Conference on Sustainable Solid Waste Management June 2016

Technology Overview. Renewable Natural Gasification - RNG: How It Works:

Biomass for Energy and Fuel

Minnesota Power Trends in Biomass Energy

Gasification of Municipal Solid Waste

Topic 6 National Chemistry Summary Notes. Fuels. Fuels and Combustion

Gasification of SRF. Matti Nieminen. IEA Bioenergy Workshop on Production and utilisation options for Solid Recovered Fuels Dublin, 20th October 2011

A LEADING PROVIDER OF CLEAN ENERGY SOLUTIONS

Waste to Energy Technologies

Thermo-chemical conversion of biomass a route for liquid fuels. S Dasappa Indian Institute of Science Bangalore

Plastics Recycling. Datchanee Pattavarakorn Industrial Chemistry, Science, CMU

Technical opportunities for the utilisation of biogas in Eastern Europe

Dennis St. George, M.Sc., P.Eng. Sr. Biosystems Engineer

Waste to Energy Technologies

Module 1d. The Bioenergy Chain. new technologies HTU, supercritical gasification, pyrolysis importance of energy condensed bio-fuels

Study and Design on Small Scale Biomass Gasification for Electricity Generation (Dual Fuel)

Mikko Hupa Åbo Akademi Turku, Finland

Energy Recovery from Litter: A Guide for Users

C R. ombustion esources, Inc. Evaluation of Stratean Inc. Gasifier System. 18 March Consultants in Fuels, Combustion, and the Environment

green energy to the power3

Transcription:

Chapter 04-04 page 1 04-04: Odd biomass fractions Properties and processes Introduction There are mainly five different processes to choose from to produce useful energy from any type of biomass. Three different thermal process routes Combustion for direct generation of heat and electricity in CHP-plants or co-firing in industrial processes, Thermal gasification for subsequent combustion of the gas ( product gas ) in CHP-plants, in industrial processes, or for further chemical processing of the product gas Pyrolysis for subsequent combustion of the solid, liquid and/or gaseous product fuel in CHP-plants, in industrial processes or further chemical processing of the pyrolysis product The pyrolysis can be high-temperature (about 700 o C) or low-temperature (about 300 o C, torrefaction ), yielding different ratios of solid residue ( char ), liquid residue ( pyrolysis oil ) and gaseous residue ( pyrolysis gas ) Two different biochemical process routes Fermentation for subsequent combustion of the liquid fuel (alcohol, mainly ethanol) in ICengines or as an additional fuel in CHP-plants, in industrial processes or as raw material for subsequent synthesis to a new product Anaerobic digestion for subsequent combustion of the gas ( biogas ) in IC-engines or as an additional fuel in CHP-plants, in industrial processes or as raw material for subsequent synthesis to a new product The processes each have their own characteristic as outlined in chapter 04-00 and they all put different demands of the raw material entering the process. For all the three thermal processes, a major aspect is the ash amount, composition and melting behaviour. Large amounts of molten ash may in some types of equipment cause severe operational problems and should be avoided. Volatile ash components such as some of the heavy metals will also escape in gas phase from high-temperature processes and may be a constraint to the choice of process. Inorganic materials will distribute between bottom ash and fly ash and the usefulness of this by-product will be affected of the process temperature and the process conditions. The water content of the fuel, i.e. the lower heating value, see section 04-00-01a, will also be an important factor. For the two thermal conversion processes gasification or pyrolysis the total efficiency obtained in the more complex process in combination with the cost for the conversion as well as the market for the products are often the limiting factors. For the two biochemical routes, the composition of the organic material (see 03-03-03) is one of the determining factors while the usefulness and the potential market for the residue as a fertilizer or a soil improvement agent is to a great extent influenced by the composition of the inorganic fraction.

Chapter 04-04 page 2 Concentrating on combustibles from solid household waste (MSW) the most significant property is that it is variable between countries, regions and cities. The composition of the household waste is also population dependant in the respect that the refuse produced by different age and income groups in society tends to differ because of different consumption patterns and different standards of living. However, some things may be stated. Typically, the combustible fraction is composed by nine major components, here characterized by their ultimate analysis with respect to carbon (C), hydrogen (H), oxygen (O), nitrogen (N) and sulphur (S), together with ash. The analysis is given in % by weight on a dry basis and the (very approximate) reference heating value in MJ/kg: C H O N S Ash q NET,DAF 1: Plastics 60 7.2 22.8 10 25.9 2: Rubber 78 10 2 10 37.2 3: Leather 60 8 11.6 10 0.4 10 27.9 4: Textiles 55 6.6 31.2 4.6 0.15 2.5 21.1 5: Wood waste 49.5 6 42.7 0.2 0.1 1.5 17.4 6: Paper 43.5 6 44 0.3 0.2 6 16 7: Cardboard 44 5.9 44.6 0.3 0.2 5 15.9 8: Food waste 48 6.4 37.6 2.6 0.4 5 18.4 9: Garden waste 47.8 6 38 3.4 0.3 4.5 17.9 Table 04-04 1: Typical ultimate analysis for combustible fractions in MSW The plastic fraction is certainly combustible but is not biomass. Typically, the plastic fraction present in household waste is some 5-15 % and mainly consists of food packaging and plastic bags. The two below the dotted line food waste and garden waste should both, preferably, be separated into the general waste fraction treated by anaerobic digestion rather than being present in the combustible fraction. Federal European statistics on waste are not yet fully co-ordinated but compiling data from a number of different investigations one can see that the over-all composition between states tend to vary significantly with paper and cardboard about 20 + 10 % and plastics 10 + 5 % making up about one third of the total. Glass, ceramics and metal, together with other inert fractions like renovation waste and alike is typically about the same amount, one third, with biodegradables making up for the rest. However, as pointed out, the composition is highly variable and depending on local/regional conditions. Using 16 MJ/kg for the paper fraction (20 % by weight), 26 MJ/kg for plastics (10 %) and 18 MJ/kg for biodegradables (33 %), the remaining 37 % non-combustible this yields 11-12 MJ/kg dry material.

Chapter 04-04 page 3 The moisture content in the fuel fraction depends strongly on the fractions present but is also affected by the way the collection is organized but may generally be assumed at about 20 %, finally yielding a typical heating value for the wet waste about 8-10 MJ/kg. This is a typical value and may well be used for dimensioning purposes though it must be remembered that the collection logistics (see chapter 03-04) will have a strong influence and may contribute to a higher value. As mentioned previously (chapter 01-04), the content of chlorine in MSW may sometimes be high, almost up to 1 % by weight (dry basis). The chlorine sources are mainly two, namely plastics (i.e. PVC) and common salt as remains in food residues. In combustion, chlorine may contribute to the formation of chlorinated hydrocarbons, such as dioxin. Since any detailed description of the combustion chemistry would go far beyond the scope of this handbook, this has not been mentioned explicitly but the role of chlorine has been mentioned several times in chapter 04-00 and one major role of the waste incineration directive, 2000/76/EC, is to suppress the formation of such compounds. Hence, any waste combustion equipment aimed for waste fuels must be thoroughly dimensioned to fulfil the demands set in this directive. 04-04-01: Direct combustion Whichever are the previous processes, the final extraction of the energy contained in a fuel is always through a complete oxidation. In case this oxidation occurs in a fuel cell, as may be the case with pure fuels such as purified alcohol, hydrogen or purified hydrocarbons, it is usually not called combustion but in all other cases it is. You find fuel cells mentioned in text section 04-00-09, but since the fuel cells require a very clean fuel they would not be a realistic alternative for fuels produced from waste fractions. In the present context, we shall use the term direct combustion for the combustion of the solid, combustible fraction resulting from a proper fractioning of solid, municipal waste and for sorted and clean combustible fractions of solid industrial and societal waste. A general introduction to direct combustion is found in 04-00-02 and some more details will be found in 04-00-08, especially in 04-00-08e about district heating, 04-00-08f and -g outlining system aspects about CHP and electricity production and 04-00-08h where solidfuel boilers are introduced. With waste, the ash content is usually high, only scarcely below 15 % by weight, and the ash starts melting already at low temperatures, sometimes as low as 700 o C. Typically, the waste will be shredded prior to feeding into the boiler and magnetic materials will be separated, but there will still be significant amounts of ashes and the melting temperature will not be affected by the separation of magnetic materials. Hence, boilers for direct combustion will have to be designed to cope with large amounts of molten ash in the fireplace. Such dedicated boiler designs are available on the market since long and show a very high availability and reliability.

Chapter 04-04 page 4 The gases from waste combustion will contain several corrosive components in relatively (as compared to clean biofuels) high concentrations. In CHP-applications, this will limit the steam superheating temperature, usually to about 350-420 o C, and hence the total electricity efficiency that can be obtained from waste combustion. Direct combustion for heat production or, if the low electricity efficiency can be accepted, CHP is one major alternative for the combustible waste fraction. 04-04-02: Thermal gasification The product gas flow after a gasifier is smaller than the gas flow after combustion and hence it may be cheaper to clean the gas from corrosive and other harmful components after a gasification process. However, the gas cleaning requires that the gas is cooled, and this will then involve a process where heat is lost and the total efficiency be lowered. In some cases provided the gas can be sold or used in a process where the added value is high enough this may sometimes prove a more feasible way than direct combustion. The product gas, depending of the gasification process (see text section 04-00-01), may have a high heating value and may even be used in gas turbine cycles (text section 04-00-08f). The gas can also be used in industrial processes. In spite of the cost increase and the efficiency decrease through gasification, this is sometime a feasible alternative for thermal treatment of the combustible waste fraction. 04-04-03: Pyrolysis, including torrefaction Basically pyrolysis be it a high or low temperatures aims at producing combustible gas, a combustible liquid and a combustible solid. In a low-temperature process like torrefaction, typically about 300 400 o C the main part of the inorganic fraction will be retained in the solid fuel, the char. Hence, the solid fuel produced may exhibit a higher heating value but it will usually not be environmentally superior to the original fuel. At higher pyrolysis temperatures, a larger fraction of the energy-containing compounds will be distilled off from the char and will instead be found in the gas or in the liquid. At the same time, a larger fraction of the impurities will also be distilled off from the char. So the higher the pyrolysis temperature, the cleaner the char but at the same time the total energy retained in the solid fuel is reduced. Impurities from the fuel will distribute between the gaseous fuel (pyrolysis gas), the liquid fuel (pyrolysis oil) and the solid fuel (char) and the distribution will be temperature- and process dependant. Pyrolysis of an extremely complex mixture of materials such as a waste fraction will be a highly unpredictable process because of varying feed composition and varying heating value. Hence, the products will also become unpredictable and it will be virtually impossible to claim that the process adds value to the products to such an extent as to defend the cost increase inherent in an additional process step.

Chapter 04-04 page 5 However if a specific fraction, such as car tyres or similar, can be separated, the situation changes completely and pyrolysis may become a viable process adding significant value to the feedstock from an energy perspective. 04-04-04: Biochemical fermentation Obviously, biochemical treatment of waste should be exclusively restricted only to the wet organic fraction and not to the combustible fractions. Alcohol fermentation, which is what we typically mean by the word fermentation in this context, requires that the feed contains sufficient amounts of readily available fermentable sugars (refer back to 04-00-01). Such sugars are known as hexoses, i.e. they contain six carbon atoms in the molecule, while many of the sugars present in biomass as a whole only contain five carbon atoms. In case an organic fraction with high sugar content is easily available in sufficient amounts, such as waste from a sugar factory, it may be feasible to erect a separate fermentation plant. If this is not the case it is most probably wiser to mix the sugar-rich waste with a substrate containing more nitrogen and feed the mixture to an anaerobic digester. 04-04-05: Biochemical (anaerobic) digestion Basically, any organic material can be biochemically decomposed and anaerobic digestions is one main mechanism. However, different materials will decompose at different rates and the gas produced ( biogas ) will also differ in composition. As shown in text section 03-03-05a, the biogas from digestion of organic waste will typically exhibit significantly lower methane contents as compared to the gas produced from manure or from wastewater treatment plants. You will also notice, see table 03-03 2, that the gas from household waste will contain more of chlorinated compounds and more of aromatic hydrocarbons. The amount of chlorinated compounds is partly due to the presence of salt in the organic (food-) waste from households and may give rise to corrosion problems in case the un-cleaned biogas is used in an IC-engine for CHP. Also the digestate from waste digestion will be contaminated and cannot be used as a soil improvement agent or as a fertilizer on agricultural land. Both properties the lowering of the gas quality and the lowering of the digestate quality tend to point towards one and the same conclusion: Anaerobic digestion of waste streams should be kept separate, to disturb neither the quality nor the process stability in digestion processes fed with cleaner substrates.

Chapter 04-04 page 6 04-04-06: Planning aspects Direct combustion for heat production or, if the low electricity efficiency can be accepted, CHP is one major alternative for the combustible waste fraction. In spite of the cost increase and the efficiency loss through gasification, this may sometime be a feasible alternative for thermal treatment of a combustible waste fraction. Pyrolysis of an extremely complex mixture of materials such as a waste fraction will be a highly unpredictable process because of varying feed composition and varying heating value. Hence, the products will also become unpredictable and it will be virtually impossible to claim that the process adds value to the products to such an extent as to defend the cost increase inherent in an additional process step. To make the pyrolysis process economically viable, the product fuel must be predictable and to achieve that, the feedstock must consist of a well-defined fraction sorted out from the waste stream. If this can be achieved, then pyrolysis may be a very good way to produce a useful secondary fuel out of a waste fraction In case an organic fraction with high sugar content is easily available in sufficient amounts, such as waste from a sugar factory, it may be feasible to erect a separate fermentation plant. If this is not the case it is most probably wiser to mix the sugar-rich waste with a substrate containing more nitrogen and feed the mixture to an anaerobic digester. Since the presence of household waste tends to lower not only the gas quality but also the digestate quality, anaerobic digestion of waste streams should be kept separate, to disturb neither the quality nor the process stability in digestion processes fed with cleaner substrates.