SHIFT Model Training: Scenario 5A

Similar documents
SHIFT Model Training: Scenario 3A

SHIFT ODME Model & Utilities. Prepared For: Institute for Trade and Transportation Studies

GIS-based Modeling for Statewide and Corridor Freight Planning

Chapter 8 Travel Demand Forecasting & Modeling

City of Tacoma TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN DRAFT

All Roads Do Not End at the State Line: Methodologies for Enabling Geodata Sharing Across Boundaries

Performance Based Transportation Project Assessment. Utilizing Travel Demand Model Data and Dynamic Economic Modeling

Modeling Applications for Freight Tennessee DOT Freight Planning

Transportation Model Report

Statewide Model Application Using the Texas SAM

6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS

Massive GPS Travel Pattern Data for Urban Congestion Relief in the Twin Cities

New Mexico Statewide Model

Feasibility of a Statewide Travel

STATEWIDE ANALYSIS MODEL (SAM-V3) June 5, 2014 Janie Temple

Section 1.0 INTRODUCTION. Section 2.0 MODEL ARCHITECTURE RECOMMENDATIONS, PHASE I, TIER I - PASSENGER CAR AND TRUCK..

IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Request for Proposal

Maryland Statewide Transportation Model (MSTM)

GENESEE COUNTY URBAN TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL IMPROVMENTS

TDOT's New Staffs, Future Plans, and opportunities for Collaboration with MPOs

Innovations in Freight Planning and Project Prioritization

A Travel Time Reliability Estimation and Valuation Approach for Transportation Planning Applications

Standardization of Travel Demand Models

report final Decennial Model Update Executive Summary Contra Costa Transportation Authority Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

INDIANA S INTERMODAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Stephen C. Smith Planning Manager, Transportation Planning Division Indiana Department of Transportation

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment Western Mountain Corridor (L)

TEXPACK Integrated Travel Demand Modeling Application. Texas Planning Conference June 2016

Regional Transportation Profile Guidelines. final. report. April tpd.azdot.gov

SHRP II R-11 Strategic Approaches at the Corridor and Network Levels to Minimize Disruptions From the Renewal Process. June 10, 2014 Webinar

What is the Dakota County Principal Arterial Study?

1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Kentucky River Area Development District

technical report KATS Travel Model Update Technical Documentation Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

Joint House and Senate Transportation Committee Update to the Ten Year Plan

Des Moines Area MPO. MPO Planning Subcommittee Meeting March 3, Des M oines Area M etropolitan Planning Organization

RTC Mobility Plan Workshop. North Central Texas Council of Governments July 9, 2015

Travel Demand Model Questions

Chapter 1 Introduction

Project Title: Using Truck GPS Data for Freight Performance Analysis in the Twin Cities Metro Area Prepared by: Chen-Fu Liao (PI) Task Due: 12/31/2013

AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

APPENDIX H: TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL VALIDATION AND ANALYSIS

Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAB September 20, 2017

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Spatial Modeling for Highway Performance Monitoring System Data: Part 1. Tuesday, February 27, :00-4:00 PM ET

Optimizing Performance and Investment Decisions through Scenario Planning

APPENDIX D. Glossary D-1

Long Range Transportation Plan Project Status Update

Workshop-Tennessee Project Implementation in Shelby County, TN

Estimating Freight Activity on Major Highways with the Freight Analysis Framework (FAF)

ACTION TRANSMITTAL

9. TRAVEL FORECAST MODEL DEVELOPMENT

Regional Evaluation Decision tool for Smart Growth

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

Travel Demand Modeling At NCTCOG

Innovative Assignment Process for a Statewide Model

Appendix D. Tier 2 Final Environmental Assessment I-66 Transportation Technical Report

Statewide Travel Demand Model Update

vi Figures viii Summary S.1

House Select Committee on Strategic Transportation Planning and Long Term Funding Solutions. March 28, 2016

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Spatial Modeling for Highway Performance Monitoring System Data: Part 2. Tuesday, March 6, :00-3:00 PM ET

Appendix D Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

INCLUSION OF TIME-DEPENDENT NETWORKS IN MARYLAND STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION MODEL

AGENDA ITEM A: WELCOME & INTRODUCTIONS

D1 REGIONAL PLANNING MODEL (D1RPM V1.0.3)

TRB WEBINAR PROGRAM Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide to the Highway Capacity Manual: Contents

Appendix 1. Problem Identification for MoTI Business Cases

Kentucky Statewide Travel Model (KYSTM) Rob Bostrom Wilbur Smith Associates Combined Kentucky-Tennessee Model Users Group Meeting Bowling Green, KY

Land Use and Transportation Scenario Analysis and Microsimulation. 14 th TRB National Planning Applications Conference Columbus, OH 2013

4/26/2013. I-435 and Front Street Diverging Diamond Interchange Missouri Department of Transportation. KCITE 2012 Excellence in Transportation Award

Updating Virginia s Statewide Functional. Brad Shelton, VDOT Chris Detmer, VDOT Ben Mannell, VDOT

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

NORTH I-75 MASTER PLAN Summary Report

The Rhode Island Statewide Travel Demand Forecasting Model Sudhir Murthy and Rajesh Salem Louis Berger & Associates, Inc. INTRODUCTION.

Model Construction and Calibration Technical Documentation Draft

NC State Freight Plan

MOBILITY AND ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

Multi-Resolution Traffic Modeling for Transform 66 Inside the Beltway Projects. Prepared by George Lu, Shankar Natarajan

Freight And Infrastructure. Bruce Lambert Executive Director Institute for Trade and Transportation Studies

CHAPTER 7. TRAVEL PATTERNS AND TRAVEL FORECASTING

Interactive Statewide Transportation Planning Modeling Process

Kentucky River Area Development District. Regional Transportation Planning Committee

MAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports

Bow Concord I-93 Improvements City of Concord Transportation Policy Advisory Committee

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN. Greater Houston Freight Committee Kick-Off Meeting

AGENDA ITEM #17: VIRGINIA S 2025 TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND HB2: OIPI CONSULTANT

OKI Congestion Management System Analysis. Data Collection Report Year 1

Presented to : I 710 Project Committee June 30, 2011

September Public Meetings. Developing a Blueprint for the Corridor

A Network Demand Model for Rural Bypass Planning. Paper Number

Origin-Destination Trips and Skims Matrices

Integrated Transportation Plan. TAC Meeting September 16, 2014

2010 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION MODEL UPDATE

Truck GPS Data for Freight Planning

Appendix B. Benefit-Cost Technical Memorandum

HCM 6th Edition Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide (PPEAG) to the HCM Bringing Back-of-the-Envelope Back.

I 94/90 (TWIN CITIES CHICAGO) 10/2/2009. Objectives

GDOT-Office of Planning Update

ARKANSAS. Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan. LRITP Stakeholder Meetings. June 27-30, 2016

POLK COUNTY TPO Polk County 2060 Transportation Vision Plan Final Report. ADOPTED June 18, 2009

Linking the Transportation Model to the LEAM Land Use Model: Year 1 Final Report

Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAC August 2, 2017

Transcription:

SHIFT Model Training: Scenario 5A ITTS Freight in the Southeast Conference 2017 Liza Amar February 15 th 2017

Overview SHIFT Model Scope Model Scenario Examples Coding the Scenario Running the Model Evaluating Results Wrap up & Questions 2

SHIFT Model Scope

SHIFT Model Scope Southern Highway Interactive Freight Traffic (SHIFT) Model Phases of Model Development Phase I (mid 2013) = Master Network and TAZ development Phase II (Jan 2016) = OD trip table and GUI development = SHIFT Model Phase III (October 2016) = Training scenarios Purpose of the SHIFT Model Common framework A consistent reporting tool GIS based and compatible with other planning databases Uses existing, available data Analyze movements on major freight corridors, regionally and/or nationally Not a replacement for existing modeling or state freight plans 4

SHIFT Model Scope Study Area National study area (minus Alaska and Hawaii) Focus on the 9 Institute for Trade and Transportation Studies member states Model Years Base Year 2014 Forecast Year 2040 E+C (85 E+C Projects) Trip purposes Auto Truck Temporal Characteristics Daily Average weekday 5

SHIFT Model Scope Data Sources National Highway Planning Network (NHPN) Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) Freight Analysis Framework, version 3 (FAF3) State Data: Networks, AADT, E+C Projects Traveler Analysis Framework (TAF) 6

SHIFT Model Scope Model Flow Chart 7

Model Scenario Examples

Training Scenarios Scenario 1 (Georgia) I 75 Truck Only Lane Scenario 2 (Kentucky) Regional I 69 Project Scenario 3 (Louisiana) Flooding Events Scenario 4 (Arkansas) Bridge Closures New Madrid Event Scenario 5 (Missouri) I 70 Work Zone All scenarios are based on 2040 E+C Model 9

Scenario 5: Missouri (I 70 Workzone) Work Zone on I 70 5A: Jackson 5B: Boone 5C: St. Louis City Reduce to 1 lane / dir Reduce to 50 mph 10

Accessing the Model Model Package Delivered January 2016 Developed in TransCAD 6.0 release 2 build 9085 Interface contains Scenario Manager, Model Run, and Utilities Reference Model Documentation (User s Guide & Practice Scenarios) Installing the SHIFT Model Install directly under the C drive (e.g. C:\SHIFT_Model\ ). Sub folders: Interface resource files and the GUI files for the add in Master input files to create a model scenario Parameters parameters files to run the model 11

Coding the Scenario Scenario 5_A: I 70 Workzone 1. Identify project and any model modifications 2. Create a new project list and code [Project ID] values Add row for Project ID=Scenario_5_A_1, RUCODE=3, FCLASS=9, LANES=2 Add row for Project ID=Scenario_5_A_2, RUCODE=1, FCLASS=9, LANES=2 3. Code [Project_ID1] in the master highway network Split Link ID = 84776 at Jackson/Lafayette County Line Add Scenario_5_A_1 on link IDs = 196320, 86362, 86361, 86359,, 86523 Add Scenario_5_A_2 on link IDs = 84776 12

Coding the Scenario Scenario 5_A: I 70 Workzone 4. Validation (connectivity/attribute checks) Split Link ID = 84776 at Jackson/Lafayette County Line Verified I 70 alignment on I 35 instead of I 670 5. Add centroid connectors and updated attributes Add link from Node/TAZ 29095 to Node 88772 (US 71) Add link from Node/TAZ 29095 to Node 88771 (I 435) 6. Update link IDs in the Select Link query file Select Link Add Link Delete Link Join Links Split Links Reshape Link Attrs. Node Attrs. Master>SelectLink.qry I 35 (Link ID 85448) MO 210 (Link ID 88466) I 470 (Link ID 86717) 13 *Edit Settings

Running the Model 1. Install the interface TransCAD 6.0 r2 build 9085 TransCAD>Tools>Add Ins SHIFT Model Interface 14

Running the Model 2. Create the Scenario Scenario Manager Add Scenario Load Scenario Verify File Paths Input files Parameter files Output files 15

Running the Model 3. Run the model Run Type Run by Step Single Model Run Multiple Model Run Load scenario (.scn) files 16

Running the Model Utilities Tables Validation Statistics Trip Purpose Statistics Assignment Statistics Demographics by State Utilities Maps Congestion Map Trip Purpose Flow Maps Validation Map Demographics Map 17

Evaluating Results Daily Volume Maps Volume Difference Maps 1. Join assignment results scenario 3A (Build) network Base (No Build) results 2. Create formula fields DIFF: Build No Build flows ABSDIFF: Abs(DIFF) COLOR: DIFF/ABSDIFF 3. Create themes Bandwidth on ABSDIFF Color Theme on COLOR Red = More volume Green = Less volume Grey = Min change 18

Evaluating Results Bandwidth Flow Maps Map>Scaled Symbol Theme>Choose flow field (Ex: [Tot_Truck_Flow]) Select Link Flow Maps Join network with output assignment (MMA_Link_Flow.bin) Map>Scaled Symbol Theme>Check Dual Fields box>choose flow field No Build Build MO 210 US 24 19

Wrap up & Questions

21 Results Presented The SHIFT Model can provide: Daily volumes for Auto and Truck Daily volume percent difference Bandwidth flow maps Select link analysis The SHIFT Model is an appropriate tool for: Analysis of regional or national truck assignments City to City and State to State analysis Large corridor (interstate) planning, especially for rural areas Support statewide travel demand models (Through trips, validation checks, subarea analysis, etc.) The SHIFT Model is NOT an appropriate tool for: Replacing existing statewide or regional travel demand models Replacing existing freight tools or freight plans Use in toll modeling, urban area modeling, intersection and interchange analysis or mode choice analysis.

Questions? Liza R. Amar, AICP, EI CDM Smith 713 423 7421 AmarER@cdmsmith.com