Getting the Most Out of APPA s FPI Survey and Report Tool. Christina Hills Director of Credentialing & Benchmarking May 30,2012

Similar documents
Facilities Benchmarking: Effectively Using the FPI Survey. Christina Hills Director of Credentialing & Benchmarking May 28, 2011

South Carolina Society for Hospital Engineers

Timmins and District Hospital

Deep Energy Retrofit Modeling and Cost Effectiveness Study: A Technical Policy Brief. January 2013

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Queen Street Campus Energy Conservation and Demand Management Plan

Bryant University s Energy Guidelines for Sustainability

Prerequisite. prerequisite.

Lambton Kent District School Board

Energy Assessment Report Clayville Elementary School DRAFT October George Washington Highway, Clayville, RI DRAFT

Building Operator Certification Level I

Customer Name Date. Site Address. Contact #1 Position. Office Phone Mobile Phone. Address. Contact #2 Position. Office Phone Mobile Phone

Pennsylvania Watt Watchers. Business Programs

Energy Auditing for Schools. Maryland Energy Administration Eric Oliver, EMO Energy Solutions, LLC May 10, 2007

US1 IEA. Renovation of Wausau West High School, Wisconsin, United States of America

The Creative and Performing Arts High School (CAPA) Pittsburgh, PA 9/30/2002 Andrew Tech Mechanical Option Prof. S. A. Mumma

BOMA s Energy Efficiency Program BEEP Course 4. No- and Low Cost Operational Adjustments to Improve Energy Performance

ENERGY USAGE & CONSERVATION-DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN June 30, 2018 Update

ENERGY USAGE & CONSERVATION-DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN June 1, 2017 Update

Incentives & Resources for Small Customers. Adam B. Fields I Leidos

Emerging Technologies

Energy Reduction Strategy Through 2020

SUMMARY OF SERVICES & INCENTIVES

Fifteen Year Plan for Energy Efficiency and Conservation Projects

ENERGY AND WATER CONSERVATION AND DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN

High Impact Hotel Projects

George Brown College Energy Conservation and Demand ManagementPlan

FOR ADDITIONS and REMODELS Before filling out this application, read Green Building & Green Points Guideline Booklet for more in-depth information.

SECTION 3: SUSTAINABLE DESIGN CONTENTS

2014 ENERGY REPORT. Mark J. Ferguson, P.E. Campus Operations & Plant Manager

SCHAEDLER YESCO ENERGY EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES

K-12 Proposition 39 Update. Jillian Rich March 23, 2015

Conservation & Demand Management Plan

New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Clean Energy Program Incentives and Proposed Hurricane Sandy Storm Response

A Building Commissioning Overview. Presented by: Goetting & Associates Commissioning

Project Name: Example Building OFPC Project No.: 12345

Customer Benefits. Why Energy Efficiency? Consumers Energy Business Solutions. What Business Solutions Incentives Are Available?

Energy Efficiency Solutions for Multifamily Housing. Clark Energy Group LLC

DTE Energy Commercial & Industrial Energy Optimization Program. Trade Ally Meeting. Guardian Plumbing & Heating January 20, 2011

05/14/2012. How to Get Started with the Ameren Illinois ActOnEnergy Program. How to Get Started with ActOnEnergy Program

2016 LEED Equivalency Analysis for Stanford Campus

Multifamily Net Zero Retrofit Market: Technical and Cost Benchmarks for San Francisco

Energy Reduction Programs: Understanding, Implementing & Delivering. PL Energy Services

Consumers Energy Business Solutions. Commercial and Industrial Energy Efficiency Program January 15, 2013

Interim report 2016 progress on the 5-Year Energy Management Plan

Implementing Low-Cost Energy Savings Projects & Conducting Energy Audits

Sustainable Development at the University of Regina

How LEED v4 Impacts Energy Professionals and Mirrors Broader Sustainability Trends. Dan LeBlanc Senior Sustainability Manager

ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN SCHOOLS SAVING ENERGY, IMPROVING PERFORMANCE, AND REDUCING COSTS

nmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwer tyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopas dfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx cvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq

Energy Savings at Military Installations: A Case Study

Welcome ESC Educational Webinar Green Performance Contracting

05/14/2012 THE CRIME OF IMPROPER ENERGY MANAGEMENT AGENDA

A GUIDE TO ENERGY MANAGEMENT. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ENERGY STAR

PARK PLACE CASE STUDY VANCOUVER. Heat reclaim system expected to reduce steam consumption 80%, GHG emissions 68%

Campus-Wide Energy Efficiency Improvements Jeff Trick, Director, Physical Plant Wright State University

Energy Efficiency in Multi-Tenant Office Buildings

Summary of Greening of State Government Executive Orders

Stanford s Energy Story Present and Future

Energy Efficiency and Reduction. Tribal Lands and Environment Forum August 15, 2016

FirstEnergy s Pennsylvania Utilities. Energy Efficiency Programs for Business

Session: HVAC Technologies

Special Mention, Architecture + Sustainability

Executive Order RP 49 Quarterly Energy Report for Texas A&M University September 2012

A Key Component of Environmental Sustainability Efforts and a Source of Substantial Cost Savings for FCGU. Dr. Simeon Komisar

Local Government Energy Audit:

Energy Smart Program Guide

OSU Cascades Net Zero Campus. Recommendations

City of Toronto Tower Renewal Program

Energy Upgrade California

Local Government Energy Audit:

Local Government Energy Audit: Energy Audit Report

Better By Design Energy Efficiency in Needham s Public Construction Projects

STRATEGIC ENERGY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ST. THOMAS ELGIN GENERAL HOSPITAL 2015

Conservation & Demand Management Plan

LUFacilities Policy Service Level Agreement v1.1

Hawaii Energy Policy Forum and Energy Industries Energy by Example Audit Awards Status Report October 2006-November 2007

Pepco & Delmarva Power. Commercial & Industrial Energy Savings Program Hotels and Restaurants October 18, 2012

New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Clean Energy Program Opportunities for Commercial, Industrial and Institutional Buildings

PARK DISTRICT ENERGY WALK-THROUGH. Andy Robinson, Training and Education, SEDAC

Green Retrofit. Why you should consider it, what it means, and how to get it done

COLGATE UNIVERSITY'S

Ameren Illinois Energy Efficiency Programs and Incentives. Helping public sector buildings and communities save energy and money.

Green Globes NC Criteria Comparison to LEED 2009 and LEED v4

LIBRARY ENERGY WALK- THROUGH. Andy Robinson, Training and Education, SEDAC

Establishing a Baseline, Energy Audits and Energy Star s Portfolio Manager

LEED EB:OM Credit Catagories

Energy Efficiency Programs and Incentives

Reducing Costs with Energy Efficiency

EXISTING BUILDINGS GREEN GLOBES FOR EXISTING BUILDINGS. Green Globes for GREEN GLOBES TECHNICAL REFERENCE MANUAL

5. BEST Practices Introduction

2/17/2017. Energy Accounting & Education. Topics (Electricity) Creating Electricity

2018 ENERGY REPORT. Mark J. Ferguson, P.E. Campus Operations & Plant Manager

Application of Advanced Energy Technologies

WAKE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE SUSTAINABLE ENERGY PLAN. Energy Plan

Existing Building Upgrades

Sustainable Building Operations & Upgrades

BOC Training Equivalency Crosswalk

County of Ventura General Services Agency Maintenance Division Energy Action Plan April Policy

Mind the Gaps: Post-Occupancy Discoveries from Design to Operation

ASHRAE/USGBC/IES Standard What Does It Mean for Commissioning Providers?

Transcription:

Getting the Most Out of APPA s FPI Survey and Report Tool Christina Hills Director of Credentialing & Benchmarking May 30,2012

Objectives of the Session What is the APPA FPI Program? FPI Survey Framework Benefits of Participating in the Survey New Enhanced Energy Module FPI Report Options

What is APPA s FPI? Portfolio of the key facilities measures that address the essential questions every facilities professional must be able to answer in order to effectively perform their roles. A major consideration in performance improvement involves the creation and use of performance measures or indicators. Baldrige criteria for performance excellence

Strategic tool for: Why Use the FPI? Self-Assessment Self-Improvement Peer Comparison Performance Measurement

Balanced Scorecard

Strategic Questions 1. What facilities do I have? (Financial) 2. What facilities make up our Institution? (Financial) 3. Is my institution adequately funding the facilities management annual budget? (Financial) 4. Are the operating funds that we do receive being spent in a manner that supports desired outcomes? (Internal) 5. Is my institution making the right investment in our existing buildings, infrastructure and academic programs? (Financial) 6. Are the customers satisfied with the space and service? (Customer) 7. Are we building a staff that can sustain excellence? (Learning & Growth)

Cohort Groups Participating in the FPI University of North Carolina System University System of Georgia California State University System University of Wisconsin System MHEC (Midwestern Higher Education Compact) CAUBO (Canadian Association of University Business Officers) Housing/Res Life

Green Globes Program Energy and Environmental Assessment Tool Facilitates Assessment of Buildings by Owners Question Based tool Rating: Energy Water Resources Emissions Effluents and hazardous materials Indoor environment Environmental Management

Campus Portfolio Assessment Different building types (e.g. multi-residential, administration, sports, light industrial, labs etc.) Building A (residence) Physical attributes of the base building Performance metrics One set of questions for the campus Different set of questions for each building type Facilities Department Campus Assessment Site attributes e.g. Site remediation Landscaping Environmental Mgmt e.g. Policies Procedures Training Communications Procurement Occupant activities Building B (residence) Physical attributes of the base building Performance metrics Building C (sports facility) Physical attributes of the base building Performance metrics Building D (classrooms) Physical attributes of the base building Performance metrics Building D (classrooms) Physical attributes of the base building Performance metrics Physical attributes e.g. HVAC Lighting Envelope Water fixtures IAQ Pollution controls Performance metrics Energy Carbon Waste Individual Building Assessments Building A Building B Building C Building D Building E

Green Globes individual building questionnaire ENERGY Lighting features HVAC features Hot water system Building controls (BAS) Sub-metering Other energy efficiency features (heat recovery, variable speed drives, energy efficient motors etc.) Renewable energy systems Building Envelope features and condition WATER Water efficient fixtures WASTE Waste storage areas EMISSIONS & EFFLUENTS Boiler emissions Refrigerants Protection of floor drains from spills Hazardous materials on site (incl. asbestos, PCBs) INDOOR ENVIRONMENT IAQ features (ventilation, filtration, humidification) Cooling tower features Exhaust of special use areas Parking and receiving areas Control of Indoor Pollutants Mould Lighting quality Acoustic quality

Green Globes campus management questionnaire Environmental policy Environmental purchasing Communications with occupants Emergency management Energy consumption Energy management CO2 emissions Green energy Energy policy Energy audits Energy targets and monitoring Energy training Energy budget Energy sub-metering HVAC maintenance and commissioning Remote sensing and controls Building condition reports Transportation Water consumption Water policy Water audits Resource use (paper and consumer items, furniture, building materials) Recycling policy and program Waste audits Waste targets and monitoring C&D waste management policy Site remediation Site enhancement Landscaping (irrigation, xeriscaping, naturalized) Storm water management Management of ozone-depleting substances Management of storage tanks, asbestos, PCBs etc Health and safety, WHMIS Pesticide management HVAC maintenance procedures Policies and procedures to control pollutants at source (cleaning contracts, smoking, construction IAQ, IAQ audits IAQ monitoring Lighting remote sensing and control Relamping and cleaning

Energy Calculator The BEAT Complements Green Globes by providing more in-depth analysis of a building s energy use, with easy-to-understand outputs Serves to establish realistic, cost effective reduction goals and targets by targeting possible problem areas. (for example, a building that appears to be heating and cooling at the same time) Provides on-going monitoring, useful for pre and post retrofit performance evaluation Provides a solid engineering foundation for Carbon Footprint calculations and development of potential carbon reduction opportunities. Fast and easy to do. Requires only data from energy bills, and completing approximately 25 yes no type questions regarding, lighting, control systems, HVAC equipment, heating and cooling equipment and plug load.

Building Energy Allocation Tool - BEAT Tory Building 127,581 ft2 Building Energy Allocation and Savings Electricity 2008 Year Annual Energy 2,435,151 kwh Sub Meter readings Total Utility Cost $ 213,076 $ 0.088 Unit cost Reduction 11% Electricity 19.09 kwh/ft2 739.63 MJ/m2 16.99 kwh/ft2 658.27 MJ/m2 Calculated Allocation kwh/ft2 Annual Energy Annual Cost $ Red'n Pot'l Annual Utility Use Utility Savings Annual Cost Saving Overall Red'n Lighting 34% 6.49 827,951 $ 72,446 15% 703,759 124,193 $ 10,867 5% Plug Load 7% 1.34 170,461 $ 14,915 10% 153,415 17,046 $ 1,492 1% Process Electricity 7% 1.34 170,461 $ 14,915 170,461 - $ - 0% HVAC/ Fans and Pumps 37% 7.06 901,006 $ 78,838 10% 810,905 90,101 $ 7,884 4% DHW 0% - - $ - - - $ - 0% Cooling 11% 2.10 267,867 $ 23,438 10% 241,080 26,787 $ 2,344 1% Heating 4% 0.76 97,406 $ 8,523 10% 87,665 9,741 $ 852 0% Totals 100% 19.09 2,435,151 $ 213,076 2,167,284 267,867 $ 23,438 11% 16.99 kwh/ft2 658.27 MJ/m2 Steam 2008 Year Annual Energy 2,027 Mlbs Sub Meter readings Total Utility Cost $ 33,437 $ 16.500 Unit cost Reduction 10% Heating Fuel 4.66 ekwh/ft2 180.39 MJ/m2 4.19 ekwh/ft2 162.53 MJ/m2 Calculated Allocation ekwh/ft2 Annual Energy Annual Cost $ Red'n Pot'l Annual Utility Use Utility Savings Annual Cost Saving Overall Red'n Building Heating 99% 4.61 2,006 $ 33,103 10% 1,806 201 $ 3,310 10% Heating Process 0% - - $ - - - $ - 0% Baseload/ DHW 1% 0.05 20 $ 334 20 - $ - 0% Totals 100% 4.66 2,027 $ 33,437 1,826 201 $ 3,310 10% 4.19 ekwh/ft2 162.53 MJ/m2 Natural Gas 2008 Year Annual Energy 13,666 m3 Enbridge billings Total Utility Cost $ 6,211 $ 0.454 Unit cost Reduction 10% Heating Fuel 1.12 ekwh/ft2 43.58 MJ/m2 1.01 ekwh/ft2 39.27 MJ/m2 Calculated Allocation ekwh/ft2 Annual Energy Annual Cost $ Red'n Pot'l Annual Utility Use Utility Savings Annual Cost Saving Overall Red'n Building Heating 99% 1.11 13,529 $ 6,149 10% 12,176 1,353 $ 615 10% Heating Process 0% - - $ - - - $ - 0% Baseload/ DHW 1% 0.01 137 $ 62 137 - $ - 0% Totals 100% 1.12 13,666 $ 6,211 12,313 1,353 $ 615 10% 1.01 ekwh/ft2 39.27 MJ/m2 Water 2008 Year Annual Consumption 28,049 m3 Sub Meter readings Total Utility Cost $ 60,305 $ 2.150 Unit cost Reduction 30% Water 219.85 Litres/ft2 20.43 L/m2 153.90 Litres/ft2 14.30 L/m2 Calculated Allocation Litres/ft2 Annual Energy Annual Cost $ Red'n Pot'l Annual Utility Use Utility Savings Annual Cost Saving Overall Red'n DCW 71% 156.10 19,915 $ 42,817 30% 13,940 5,974 $ 12,845 21% Process 0% - - $ - - - $ - 0% Cooling/ Summer Extra 29% 63.76 8,134 $ 17,488 30% 5,694 2,440 $ 5,247 9% Totals 100% 219.85 28,049 $ 60,305 19,634 8,415 $ 18,092 30% 153.90 Litres/ft2 14.30 L/m2 DHW 0% HVAC/ Fans and Pumps 37% Process 0% Electricity Use Breakdown Cooling 11% Heating 4% Lighting 34% Plug Load 7% Process Electricity 7% Steam Use Breakdown Heating Process 0% Baseload/ DHW 1% Building Heating 99% Natural Gas Use Breakdown Heating Process 0% Cooling/ Summer Extra 29% Building Heating 99% Baseload/ DHW 1% Water Use Breakdown DCW 71% Existing ekwh/ft2 Annual Energy ekwh Annual Cost $ Annual Cost $/ft2 ekwh/ft2 Cost Savings Building Total 24.87 3,172,553 $ 313,029 $ 2.45 22.20 $ 45,455 15% 963.60 MJ/m2 860.06 MJ/m2 Overall Red'n

BEAT outputs End use e.g. Lighting Energy saving measures e.g. Complete upgrade to high efficiency lamps. Upgrade/replace lighting controls Cost to implement e.g. $31K Tory Building Energy Retrofit Project Cost Estimate Energy-saving Implemen- Energy end use tation Cost Cost Implemen Potential Cost Simple Electricity Y/N measures Energy Savings Opportunities $/ft2 tation Cost Cost $ Savings $ Payback Payback Years per sf Lighting - Convert to High Efficiency Lamps/Ballasts - - Convert Exit Lamps to LED - x Replace Incandescent lamps with CFL $ 0.01 $ 1,000 x Upgrade/ Replace Existing Controls $ 0.24 $ 30,000 Total $ 31,000 $ 10,867 2.9 Plug Load x High Efficiency Appliances $ 0.08 $ 10,000 - Remove Unnecessary Loads $ 0.00 $ 0 - Circuit Control - Total $ 10,000 $ 1,492 6.7 Process Electricity - Remove Unnecessary Loads - - Circuit Control - Total $ - $ - - HVAC Fan Systems - Major Equipment Replacement - - Fan Systems Overhaul/Upgrade - - New Building Automation System - x Upgrade/Optimize Fan System Control $ 0.08 $ 10,000 x Recommissioning/Air Balancing $ 0.24 $ 30,000 - Exhaust Air Heat Recovery - Total $ 40,000 $ 8,736 4.6 HVAC Pump Systems - Major Equipment Replacement - - Pump Systems Overhaul/Upgrade - - Upgrade/Optimize Pump Control - - Recommissioning/Water Balancing - Total $ - $ - - Domestic Hot Water - Boiler Replacement - - Optimize Control/Delivery Temperature - - Low Flow Fixtures Replacement - Total $ - $ - - Cooling Plant - Replace R-22 Refrigerant Chiller - - Retrofit/Overhaul Existing Chillers - x HVAC Controls Optimization $ 0.08 $ 10,000 - Cooling Tower Control - VFD/Winterize - - Building Envelope/Solar Film/Shading - Total $ 10,000 $ 2,344 4.3 Electricity Total $ 91,000 $ 23,438 3.9 Potential savings e.g. $10,867 Payback (years) e.g. 2.9 Heating Fuel Y/N Energy Savings Opportunities Implementation Cost $/ft2 Heating Plant - Heating Boiler Replacement - - Retrofit/Overhaul Boilers - - DHW Boiler Replacement - - Summer Boiler/Boiler Control - - Stack Heat Recovery - x HVAC Controls Optimization 0.12 x Optimize Ventilation Rate 0.08 - Optimize Humidification - x Building Envelope/Infiltration/Pressurization 0.02 Implemen tation Cost $ $ $ 15,000 $ $ 10,000 Potential Cost Savings $ Simple Payback Years $ $ 3,000 Heating Fuel Total $ 28,000 $ 3,925 7.1 Water Y/N Energy Savings Opportunities Implementation Cost $/ft2 Implemen tation Cost $ Potential Cost Savings $ Simple Payback Years Domestic Cold Water x Low Flow Fixtures/Controls Upgrade $ 0.12 $ 15,000 - Optimize Cooling Tower Control - - Exterior Use Controls/Optimization - Water Total $ 15,000 $ 18,092 0.8 Implemen tation Cost $ Potential Cost Savings $ Simple Payback Years Grand Total $ 134,000 $ 45,455 2.9

BEAT Outputs: One-Page Executive Summary Annual energy performance Potential costs, savings, ROI Key energy saving measures for consideration

Benefits of Participating FPI Report Access to all areas Free to participating APPA members Benchmarking made easy Immediate, online, year-long access Trending flexible to 5 years Access to your cohort average Beta review period opens early Multiple reports/graphs to view/print/download

Resources to Assist You Visit the APPA FPI website area at http://www.appa.org/research/fpi/index.cfm Archived webinars on the FPI website will instruct you on how to complete the FPI survey instrument. http://www.appa.org/research/fpi/webinar.cfm Contact Christina Hills to arrange a personalized GoToMeeting webinar. Additional information on the FPI Qualified Advisors Program can also be found on the APPA website @ http://appa.org/research/fpiadvisors.cfm Questions? Contact Christina Hills, Director of Credentialing & Benchmarking Tel: 703.542.3844 Email: christina@appa.org