Chief Systems Engineers Panel

Transcription

1 Chief Systems Engineers Panel Jim Thompson ODDR&E/Systems Engineering 13 th Annual NDIA Systems Engineering Conference San Diego, CA October 26, 2010 Oct 2010 Page-1

2 Mission Context Director, Systems Engineering Steve Welby Systems Analysis Kristen Weapon Baldwin Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 S ; System d.(1): The Complexity development Analysis and tracking of detailed Red measurable Teaming performance criteria as part of the systems engineering master plans Modeling & Simulation Coordination Office S ; d.(3): A system for storing and tracking Development information relating Planning to the achievement SE for of Systems the performance of Systems criteria and objectives specified Program Protection/Acquisition Cyber Security S ; SEC. 103.b.(4): Evaluating the utility of SE performance Research metrics Centerused to measure the cost, schedule, and performance of [MDAPS], and making such recommendations to improve such metrics. Major Program Support James Thompson Program Support Reviews Systems Engineering Plans Program Technical Auditing OIPT/DAB Support DAES Database Analysis and Support Performance Measurement Systemic Root Cause Analysis Mission Assurance Nicholas Torelli AT&L Memo, 14SEP2010 Subject: Better Buying Power: Guidance for Greater Efficiency and Productivity Systems and Software Engineering in Defense Spending Policy, Guidance, Standards System Safety Reliability, Availability, Maintainability Quality, Manufacturing, Producibility Human Systems Integration (HSI) Technical Workforce Development Organizational Capability Assessment (WSARA) Set shorter program timelines and manage to them remain cognizant of our programs progress and identify problems quickly Oct 2010 Page-2

3 Themes Metrics Elegant systems engineering designs require us to augment intuition and judgment with quantitative means and effective analytical methods Harness the right measures to help inform decisions Industry, Academia, Agencies, Services have role in shaping quantitative methods and driving efficiencies into acquisition Integration Integrate the information for better domain management /problem solving Communication Effectively shape, share and disseminate results: Updates to policy and guidance (e.g. SEP Prep Guide) Conference, symposia, white papers, etc Building Bridges Services, Industry, Acquisition Leadership, Academia Joint Program Reviews Initial focus: Software Integration Reliability Manufacturing Oct 2010 Page-3

4 Program Review Process Current Review Process CAIG CARD LHA ESOH Integrated PESHE PSR TRA SAE AFRB OSD PSR Disparate PEO Sufficiency Review MRA SEP Integration Risks ID Disjointed Oct 2010 Page-4 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A Cleared for public release by OSR on 30 July SR Case 10-S-2872 Source: JiPRA Brief to SAF_AQ Jun 09.pptx

5 Integrated collaborative review OSD, Army, Navy, AF, Product Center DDR&E/SE PSR methodology Oct 2010 Page-5 Integrated OSD/AF PSR SDB II Example Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) Risk Identification: Integration and -ilities (RI3) Manufacturing Readiness Assessment (MRA) Logistics Health Assessment (LHA) 02/09 03/09 04/09M 05/09 06/09 07/09 08/09 09/09 Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health (ESOH) Accomplishments Continuous Engagement Constructive dialogue site visits Inputs to Draft and Final Request for Proposal Preliminary Report to PM well in advance of DAB (planned ~6 months) Significant Benefits Integrated and synchronized (e.g. program impact 5 days vs. est. 38 days) Significant intellectual capital from across DoD Early, actionable feedback to program office Early and robust technical engagement to mentor/advise collaboratively, independently assess and capture risk so PMs can act Guidance and Planning Meeting 12/08 01/09 12/17/08 Teams/Schedules OSD/AQR/AAC/PM AF Integrated Review Process OSD DAPS Technology Manufacturing Systems Engr Plan Logistics ESOH Integration Approach - Early and Continuous DP 1 DP 2 DP 3 Draft RFP 2/27 Conduct PSR Assessment Identify CTEs Identify critical processes and risk areas Review/ Logistics Readiness Initial Risks/Process Eval RI3 Questions RFP Release 6/4 SEP Peer Review PSR Follow-up Indentify preliminary TRLs/complete TRA in SS Include risks in RFP for bidders to address in their proposals Prepare/Review/Complete SEP Target Risks/Process Fixes Risk Buy Down AFRB 10/09 OIPT Down Select 9/30 Documentation Approval DAB 11/09

6 Acquisition Efficiency Guidance Roadmap 5 Areas Target Affordability and Control Cost Growth Incentivize Productivity & Innovation in Industry Promote Real Competition Improve Tradecraft in Acquisition of Services Reduce Non-Productive Processes and Bureaucracy Oct 2010 Page-6

7 For Additional Information Jim Thompson ODDR&E/Systems Engineering (703) Oct 2010 Page-7