The Control of Wilding Conifers in Kenepuru Sound
|
|
- Juliana Wood
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MANAGEMENT STRATEGY: The Control of Wilding Conifers in Kenepuru Sound September 2010 Prepared for: KENEPURU & CENTRAL SOUNDS RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INC. Prepared by: Andrew Macalister Leviathan Consulting With support from:
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 3 BACKGROUND... 4 Defining the problem... 5 Current situation... 6 Wilding spread patterns... 7 THE STRATEGY... 9 Purpose and Status of Strategy... 9 Vision... 9 Methods... 9 MANAGEMENT PLAN Management sectors Site-led prioritisation Budget estimates Management Plan summary Maintenance Control IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Control methodologies Control timing Contractor procurement Landowner liaison & approvals Health & Safety Statutory compliance Contractor management Programme management BUSINESS PLAN Proposed expenditure Fund raising Financial management ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS REFERENCES APPENDIX 1: MAP OF MANAGEMENT SECTORS APPENDIX 2: PHOTO SELECTION APPENDIX 3: SPREAD VIGOUR OF WILDING CONIFER SPECIES P a g e
3 INTRODUCTION I welcome the initiative of the Kenepuru and Central Sounds Residents Association to initiate a programme to reduce wilding pines in the Kenepuru. My Council includes wilding pines in its schedule of pest plants but lacks the resources to undertake a comprehensive management programme. It is the initiatives of community groups, working in partnership with Council, which is the only practical way for this pervasive problem to be overcome. We have supported this plan with seed funding and believe that the major improvements already evident in the Queen Charlotte, following the work of the Marlborough Sounds Restoration Trust, will be emulated in the Kenepuru. We look to having our landscapes restored, to see native forests covering our hillsides and for our native fauna return in increasing numbers. I commend this project. ALISTAIR SOWMAN MAYOR OF MARLBOROUGH 3 P a g e
4 BACKGROUND Wilding conifers are commonly known as wilding pines, rogue pines or feral pines. For the purposes of this Strategy, they are defined as introduced species of the Class Conifersopsida (Gymnospermae) that are self-sown or growing wild. In the Marlborough Sounds, Pinus radiata (Monterey pine) accounts for approximately 90% of all wildings encountered. In Kenepuru Sound, occasional specimens of Pinus pinaster (maritime pine), Pinus muricata (Bishop pine), Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas fir), Pinus patula (Mexican weeping pine), Cupressus macrocarpa (macrocarpa), Cupressus lawsoniana (Lawson cypress) and Cupressus lusitanica are also encountered. The dominance of Pinus radiata as a wilding conifer reflects the fact that they had been widely planted in homestead plantations and as shelter belts throughout the Sounds, dating as far back as the early 1900s. These stands of mature trees provided abundant seed sources to allow wildings to establish under limited grazing pressure across former paddocks and burnt-off hillsides during the mid-1900s. The many mature wilding conifers that are present on the south side of Kenepuru are an example of this legacy. This process is still occurring today, although on a smaller scale. On the north side of Kenepuru, for example, marginal spurs and faces are reverting to light scrub cover in close proximity to large stands of commercial Pinus radiata forestry plantations. This is allowing the rapid establishment of new wilding stands. While the opportunity for conifer establishment becomes increasingly limited as the native forest canopy matures, wilding conifers have continued to establish where high light opportunities present themselves. These light gaps naturally occur around roadsides, on coastal escarpments and along powerline access tracks. In Kenepuru Sound, such examples of on-going recruitment can be found along the length of the Queen Charlotte Drive, on powerline and access tracks, along the Queen Charlotte Track, and along the coastal margins between Waitaria and Goulter Bay. Light gaps can also be caused by one-off events such as slips, fires, drought, pig rooting or wind damage. In these micro-sites, where there is an adjacent seed source, dense stands of wilding conifers that can prevent the normal regeneration of native species can still occur. An example of this can be found on the north side of Manaroa Saddle, where a dense stand of Pinus radiata has established after a fire swept through the area, and on upper slopes on the south side of Kenepuru, where extensive pig-rooting in light vegetation cover has allowed opportunistic establishment of new wildings. The presence of commercial Pinus radiata forestry plantations on the north side of Kenepuru Sound and at Kenepuru Head means that these areas will remain more susceptible to on-going wilding establishment than the south side of Kenepuru, which is 4 P a g e
5 free of commercial forestry plantations from Broughton Bay through to Kenepuru Heads, and which also has a generally intact manuka-kanuka canopy throughout. Of related concern is the presence of Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas fir) in the area, of which one small stand was noted at Manaroa Saddle. This species is the most shadetolerant of the common wilding conifer species, able to establish even under moderate vegetation cover, and its seed is also one of the most readily-dispersed by wind, increasing the spread risk further. Although it tends to favour cooler climates, it could still pose a significant risk in the Marlborough Sounds. DEFINING THE PROBLEM The spread of wilding conifers is an increasing problem throughout the Marlborough Sounds. The problem has been acknowledged by the major land manager in the Marlborough Sounds, the Department of Conservation (DOC), by the Marlborough District Council (MDC), and by Sounds residents, business interests and recreational users. As noted in the MDC s Strategy for Control of Wilding Conifers in North Marlborough (Ledgard, 2004): There is little doubt that most of the people who live, and/or consider themselves stakeholders, in North Marlborough, in particular the Sounds area, favour the control of wilding pines. LANDSCAPE IMPACTS The most immediate impact is the visual intrusion on the landscape, and loss of associated landscape and amenity values, as wilding conifers establish above the regenerating native forest canopy and, in many areas, have become or are threatening to become the dominant forest species. The Marlborough Sounds have long been recognised as a key natural landscape and recreational resource in New Zealand (Lucas, 2007). MDC s Marlborough Sounds Resource Management Plan notes that: In its entirety, the landscape of the Marlborough Sounds Plan area has outstanding visual values. It displays a broad range of types of visual landscapes and features which are often of greater value for their collective contribution than for their individual value. The location of the Sounds at the top of the South Island with the role as a sea corridor and gateway to the South Island ensures a high public profile as a travel route. In Kenepuru Sound, the Plan identifies Portage Island, Weka Point and Ferndale Scenic Reserves, Schnapper Point, Kenepuru Head and the main dividing ridges as all being Areas of Outstanding Landscape Value. 5 P a g e
6 Lucas Blights and Blots on the Landscape: Wilding Pines in Queen Charlotte Sound (Lucas, 2007) identified that, without extensive and comprehensive wilding management, the landscape values of Queen Charlotte Sound will gradually diminish. It will lose its distinctiveness, and very special identity based on its natural qualities. It can be assumed that the same outcomes will occur in Kenepuru Sound without active management. ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS Associated with the spread of wilding conifers is the loss or displacement of native biodiversity, where wilding pines have become, or are becoming, the dominant forest species. MDC s North Marlborough Significant Natural Areas Project identifies wilding conifers as the greatest weed threat in North Marlborough. The report notes that: (Wilding conifers) are rapidly invading regenerating vegetation and sensitive places such as coastal scarps and ultramafic areas...they have the ability to rapidly proliferate and destroy the integrity of the native vegetation. DOC s South Island Wilding Conifer Strategy (Harding, 2001) identifies the threat of wilding conifers to the Marlborough Sounds as including the invasion and suppression of regenerating fernland and shrubland, and the suppression of native forest regeneration. Walls The Ecological Case for Wilding Pine Removal in Queen Charlotte Sound identifies that wilding pines put the following ecosystems at risk: i. coastal scarps ii. iii. iv. islands, regenerating native vegetation streams. The report also identifies at least eight types of native plants at risk, plus many native animals (land birds, shore-nesting birds, lizards, invertebrates and freshwater fish). CURRENT SITUATION Despite the recognition of the problem, no co-ordinated approach has been in place to manage the spread of wilding conifers in the Marlborough Sounds. DOC undertakes low-level control on the areas of public conservation land identified as top priority in its South Island Wilding Conifer Strategy (Harding, 2001), prioritised against its Strategic Plan for Managing Invasive Weeds (Owen, 1998), which considers the impact on native biodiversity only. 6 P a g e
7 This has resulted in DOC control being largely restricted to the island sanctuaries it manages, such as Blumine, Motuara and Long Island. Despite being the major land manager in the Sounds, DOC is unlikely to fund further wilding conifer control on the land it manages, as funding is allocated against native biodiversity impacts only and DOC s South Island Wilding Conifer Strategy gives most areas of public conservation land in the Sounds a ranking score of only 2.5 out of 21 on its prioritisation methodology. MDC s Regional Pest Management Strategy (2007) identifies Pinus contorta as a containment control pest plant in Marlborough and is managing a joint programme to contain its spread in South Marlborough. However, there is no known P. contorta in the Marlborough Sounds. This means that neither the Council, forest owners, nor landowners are under an obligation to manage the spread of wilding conifer species in the Marlborough Sounds. Nevertheless, resident/community groups and individuals undertake wilding conifer control on an ad hoc basis on private land, often extending onto public conservation land, with a range of control methodologies employed. Since 2007, these community activities have been supplemented by a co-ordinated wilding pine control programme in Queen Charlotte Sound, managed by the Marlborough Sounds Restoration Trust. Between 2008 and 2010, the Trust has conducted control over 5,600ha of Queen Charlotte Sound, with a budget of $500,000. Funding has been provided primarily by the NZ Lottery Grants Board (Environment & Heritage Fund), Canterbury Community Trust, landowners, Marlborough District Council, Department of Conservation, and local businesses. The programme has provided a model for how a comprehensive community-led wilding conifer programme can be initiated and maintained with the support of key stakeholders. WILDING SPREAD PATTERNS In order to understand the pattern of spread of wilding conifers, and the likelihood of successful control, consideration needs to be given to several factors, including: Age of seed production Distance of seed dispersal Viability of seed Composition and stature of plant communities on adjoining land. Age of seed production: Most pine species, including P. radiata, can start producing some seed between ages 8-10, but regular seed production from the majority of trees does not start until age (Ledgard, 2004). Distance of seed dispersal: For conifers, seed dispersal is almost entirely by wind, with most seed typically falling within 200m downwind of the parent source. Occasionally, seed is dispersed greater distances of more than a kilometre. This distant spread typically occurs at greater than five year intervals, often averaging only once every years (Ledgard, 2004). Factors that influence the distance seed travels are: 7 P a g e
8 The size and weight of seeds: The seed of P. radiata is relatively heavier than the seed of other common wilding species and is therefore less likely to travel as long distances as P. contorta, for example. In a trial where seed was released into a fixed-speed airflow of 30km/h, 45% of the P. radiata seed dropped within 2m of the release point (Ledgard, unpubl. data). No data is recorded for P. pinaster The prevalence, direction and strength of prevailing winds: The strong winds that regularly occur in the Marlborough Sounds provide a ready vehicle for seed dispersal. However, because of the turbulent wind patterns in the Sounds, the patterns of spread can be hard to predict, although it will generally be downwind from the prevailing western quadrant winds that occur. Fortunately, most seed dispersal takes place in autumn and winter (Harding, 2001), which is usually the period with the least likelihood of strong winds in the Sounds. The presence and siting of adjoining seed sources: The presence of seeding trees at exposed sites, such as ridge-tops and exposed upper faces, will increase the likelihood that seeds are widely dispersed. Conversely, the location of seeding trees at sheltered sites and on lee slopes will reduce the likelihood of dispersal. Viability of seed: There is no significant long-lasting seed bank in the soil from wilding conifers. Once released from the cone, seed generally remains viable for only two to three years in the soil, although seed may remain viable in cones for slightly longer periods (Ledgard, 2004). Composition and stature of plant communities on adjoining land: Wilding conifers generally require high light conditions in order to establish. Bare ground and lowstature plant communities, such as grassland and herbfields, are the most favourable communities for wilding establishment. Shrubland is relatively less favourable, and forest generally unfavourable (Harding, 2001). It is for this reason that mature trees are often seen in the Sounds protruding from a surrounding manuka/kanuka canopy, but with no young seedlings visible near-by. In such cases, only a disturbance which allows more light to reach the ground will create an opportunity for new wilding establishment (Ledgard, 2004). When these factors are all taken into account, it becomes obvious that the control of wilding conifers, and particularly P. radiata, is a practical proposition in the Marlborough Sounds context. The short-lived seeds, the slowness of young trees to set seed, and the limited establishment opportunities means it is a lot easier to break the cycle of wilding conifer establishment than occurs with species such as broom or gorse, which have long-lived seeds and sets seed at a young age, and banana passionfruit, where seeds can be carried long distances by birds or feral animals. It is for this reason that DOC accords wilding conifers a lower Biological Success Rating than it does to weeds such as old man s beard and gorse (Harding, 2001). A summary of the spread vigour of the most common wilding conifer species is presented in Appendix 3. 8 P a g e
9 THE STRATEGY This Strategy was commissioned by the Kenepuru & Central Sounds Residents Association (KCSRA), with funding support from the New Zealand Lottery Grants Board s Environment & Heritage Fund, the Marlborough District Council and the Department of Conservation. PURPOSE AND STATUS OF STRATEGY The Strategy has four purposes: i. To provide a framework for operational planning by prioritising areas for control and providing indicative cost estimates. (Refer to Management Plan) ii. To define proposed methods of control, and the delivery of the control programme.(refer to Implementation Plan) iii. To document proposed expenditure over the term of this Strategy, and outline a fund-raising strategy.(refer to Business Plan) iv. To enable informed discussions and collaboration with private landowners and with other control agencies, stakeholders and statutory authorities. The Strategy is a non-statutory plan, and has no legal status. VISION The Strategy s vision is for the initial control of wilding conifers from all high-priority locations of Kenepuru Sound by METHODS For the purposes of developing this strategy, a desktop survey of Kenepuru Sound was conducted in July 2010, using the Marlborough District Council s aerial orthophotography database and ArcGIS resources, Google Earth and Map Toaster, to establish the general extent and distribution of wilding conifers in the area. A three-day field inspection was undertaken in August 2010 by boat, foot and vehicle over the entire Kenepuru Sound area. 9 P a g e
10 On the basis of inspections, field data and aerial photography resources, an inventory of each control block was undertaken, with a budget developed and blocks prioritised. All major landowners in those areas where control was regarded as a priority were contacted, either during or after the field inspection, to discuss management options. Where a major landowner did not support control, or did not support the preferred method of control, this is noted in the Strategy. In some instances, the major landowner was either unable to be located, or indicated that further consultation may be required immediately prior to control, where there were multiple owners of the property. The draft plan was then provided to members of the Kenepuru & Central Sounds Residents Association for comment, before plan completion. 10 P a g e
11 MANAGEMENT PLAN A central purpose of this Strategy is to provide a framework for operational planning by prioritising areas for control and providing indicative cost estimates. To achieve this objective, a Management Plan has been developed using the following procedures. MANAGEMENT SECTORS For the purposes of operational planning, Kenepuru Sound has been divided into a number of management sectors, based on the extent of wilding conifer infestation, access considerations, tenure, land use and landscape values. Each sector is intended to represent a coherent area of land, that is of suitable scale and size, on which it is possible to undertake effective wilding conifer control in a short (2-3 month) timeframe. A map showing these management sectors is attached as Appendix 1. SITE-LED PRIORITISATION A scoring system has been developed for each management sector, to attribute a priority for each sector based on the following attributes: THREAT TO ECOLOGICAL VALUES For the purpose of this Strategy, it is assumed that the presence of wilding conifers is typically detrimental to ecological values. As outlined in The Ecological Case for Wilding Pine Removal in Queen Charlotte Sound (Walls, Marlborough Sounds Restoration Trust, 2007), the main ecosystems at risk from wilding conifers in the inner Marlborough Sounds are coastal scarps, islands, regenerating native vegetation and streams. In all of these ecosystems, invading pines grow very rapidly and become physically dominant, thereby displacing native species and changing soil and water conditions. However, ultramafic and mafic shrublands are also an important ecosystem found in the Marlborough Sounds (although not in Queen Charlotte or Kenepuru Sound), and should also be included as being at risk from wilding conifers. The threat to ecological values is scored primarily with reference to the presence of these ecosystem types. 11 P a g e
12 Score Value 1. Either ecosystems that are not at risk from wilding conifer domination (such as indigenous forest), or ecosystems that are at risk from wilding conifer domination, but which have low ecological value due to widespread abundance of other pest and weed species. 2. Ecosystems that are at risk from wilding conifer domination, but which are not nationally-important ecosystems, such as manuka/kanuka forests and regenerating shrublands. 3. Nationally-important ecosystems that are at risk from wilding conifer domination, particularly rare ultramafic plant communities and rare coastal plant communities. LANDSCAPE VALUES For the purpose of this Strategy, it is assumed that the presence of wilding conifers is detrimental to landscape values. Landscape values were scored primarily with reference to the designation of Areas of Outstanding Landscape Value, in the Marlborough Sounds Resource Management Plan (Marlborough District Council, 2003) In addition, it was assumed that wilding conifers on prominent headlands and/or skylines are more detrimental to landscape values than wilding conifers in valleys and hillsides. Score Value 1. Neither designated as an Area of Outstanding Landscape Value in the Marlborough Sounds Resource Management Plan, nor a prominent headland/skyline. 2. Partly designated as an Area of Outstanding Landscape Value in the Marlborough Sounds Resource Management Plan, or a prominent headland/skyline. 3. Designated as an Area of Outstanding Landscape Value in the Marlborough Sounds Resource Management Plan. EXTENT OF INFESTATION The practicality of undertaking effective initial control is affected by the density of the wilding conifer infestation. Lower densities allow larger areas to be cleared of wilding conifers for the same amount of resources that would be required to clear a small area of high density wilding conifers. Additionally by controlling the few outlier trees the spread of seeds over a large area is greatly reduced. 12 P a g e
13 Infestation scores were developed primarily through a desktop survey of aerial photographs of the management area, and field inspections. Most seedlings and preemergent trees will not have been identified, as they are not visible from aerial photographs or visual inspection, therefore it is accepted that the inventory will consistently underestimate the density of conifer infestation at each site. Score Value 1. Dense infestations (> 8 trees/ha). 2. Moderate infestations (2-8 trees/ha) 3. Low infestations (<2 trees/ha) RISK OF REINVASION The practicality of undertaking initial control is also influenced by the risk that wilding conifers will re-establish on a control site, thereby undermining initial control efforts and introducing significant maintenance costs. The risk of wilding conifer reinvasion was scored using the Decision Support System developed in Assessing Risk of Wilding Spread (Ledgard, Scion Research, 2008). The system accords risk based on six factors the species providing the seed source, the siting of the seed source, the location of the seed source relative to prevailing winds, the distance of the seed source, the vegetation cover at the control site, and the amount of grazing at the control site. Based on this assessment, the following general considerations apply. Of the three main conifer species encountered in the management area, Pinus pinaster and Pinus muricata have more spreading vigour than Pinus radiata. Remaining seed sources located near to the control site, on take-off sites (such as ridge-tops) and upwind of the prevailing north-westerly winds will cause more of a problem than seed sources distant from the control site, or that are in sheltered downwind locations. A control site with a closed canopy is less likely to have reinvasion problems than a lightly-vegetated site or one that is open to land disturbance. Grazing pressure will reduce reinvasion problems, even on open sites. For the purposes of scoring, it was assumed that all wilding conifers within the priority management sectors will be removed during the term of this Strategy, and therefore will not contribute to reinvasion. Conversely, it was assumed that all commercial forestry within the management area, and land for which wilding control is not favoured, will continue to contribute to reinvasion. Score 13 P a g e Value
14 1. A score of 12 or more using the DSS (high reinvasion risk) 2. A score of between 10 and 11 using the DSS (moderate reinvasion risk) 3. Score of less than 10 using the DSS (low reinvasion risk) 14 P a g e
15 BUDGET ESTIMATES In calculating the cost of initial control, the following budget assumptions have been made: Labour: Professional contractors have been budgeted at $46.00/hr Accommodation: Accommodation has been budgeted at $25.00 per person per night, for every eight-hour day worked. Herbicide: Herbicide use is calculated at $60 per person per day. Using metsulfuron at 200g/litre for herbicide injection, this assumes a contractor will use, on average, five litres of herbicide per day. Travel: Travel ex-nelson or Blenheim is calculated at between $414 and $828 each round trip, allowing for mileage and travel time. The weighting is added to every 120hrs worked, assuming a team of two-three contractors travels together and does five day spells. Use of quads, boats, additional herbicide: A weighting is added to individual block budgets, where the use of quads or boats will be required, or where additional herbicide is likely to be used, such as in thick stands of trees. Tree-felling: The felling of trees in sensitive areas, such as around roads, houses and the coastline, can rapidly increase the cost of control, with the controlled felling of a single tree costing up to $1000. A weighting is added to individual block budgets where trees exist around excluded areas, to recognise these additional costs. As the cost of each individual excluded tree is impossible to predict in advance, this weighting is not expected to fully account for all excluded trees, but to allow the priority trees to be felled. Management costs: A control programme requires a degree of management oversight, in order to obtain funding support, manage community relations, undertake contractor procurement and auditing, and reporting. For the purposes of this programme, management has been costed at 24% of the costs of control. By valuing each budget item separately, it will be possible to quantify the value of inkind support, such as the use of free accommodation or boat support, if this is offered by landowners in undertaking control. 15 P a g e
16 MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY The following table summarises the management sectors in Kenepuru Sound, their relative scoring and a budget estimate for each sector. Sectors that score less than 7 were not costed, on the basis that these were a low priority for control, and Goulter Bay sector was not costed as the primary landowner indicated they were managing the wilding conifers on their property independently. Sector Number Sector Name Total Score TOTAL COST 8 Portage Island 11 $ 2,390 5 Tara Bay 10 $ 10,130 7 Portage Bay 10 $ 15,423 9 Nikau Cove 10 $ 19,218 2 Broughton Bay 9 $ 4, McMahon East 9 $ 14,089 3 Te Mahia Bay 9 $ 17, Kenepuru Head 9 $ 21,458 4 Island Pt 9 $ 22, Weka Pt-Ferndale 9 $ 23, Shelterbelt 9 $ 30, Kenepuru 7A 9 $ 52, Sandy Bay 9 $ 58, Goulter Bay 8 Not costed 29 Double Bay 8 $ 8, Stokes 8 $ 14, Manaroa Head 8 $ 16, Black Rock 8 $ 32,976 6 Pukatea 8 $ 36,015 1 Schnapper Pt 7 $ 40, McMahon West 7 $ 18, Waitaria 6 Not costed 23 Motu Roa 6 Not costed 28 Nopera 6 Not costed 20 Fish Bay 5 Not costed 24 Waitaria Amenity 5 Not costed 27 St Omer Saddle 5 Not costed 15 Williams Rd 4 Not costed 16 Kenepuru Saddle 4 Not costed 16 P a g e
17 MAINTENANCE CONTROL No matter how successful the initial control work is, there will inevitably be trees that are missed and a few trees that re-establish after control. This will require follow-up maintenance control to be undertaken. The frequency and cost of maintenance control will differ between sites, based on a number of variables, with maintenance actions ultimately guided by field inspections of the treated areas. Therefore, the Management Strategy does not identify when follow-up control will be required to be undertaken, or at what cost. In general terms, it is anticipated that little pine re-establishment is likely in the top priority sites, primarily due to the presence of a surrounding closed native forest canopy and no adjacent seed sources. In these situations, maintenance should not be necessary more than twice over a year period. The timing of the first maintenance control cycle will generally be guided by the completeness of initial control. If a number of mature, coning trees are missed during initial control, for example, it is recommended that the first repeat control is undertaken as soon as possible to remove those trees. If no mature, coning trees are left after initial control, the first repeat control could be left for up to four or five years. The interval of up to five years after initial control will allow any missed or post-control seedlings to develop into emergent trees, which are more easily located by control operators, but will still see them controlled before they begin to set seed. (Most pine species, including Pinus radiata, can start producing seed between ages eight to ten, but regular seed production from the majority of trees does not start until ages (Ledgard, 2004)). The second repeat control could be left for up to a further ten years, if there is no remaining seed source. Each maintenance cycle should require a decreasing amount of control effort and, therefore, decreasing costs. If high numbers of seedlings establish under dense stands of poisoned trees, it is recommended that seedlings are removed at more frequent repeat intervals, to allow a native understory to develop that will help suppress further seedling establishment. 17 P a g e
18 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN A central purpose of this Strategy is to define proposed methods of control, and to outline how the control programme should be delivered. To achieve this objective, an Implementation Plan has been developed. CONTROL METHODOLOGIES The Trust has identified four control methodologies that are suitable for controlling wilding conifers in Kenepuru Sound. Herbicide injection: An effective and proven methodology herbicide injection - is available for the control of medium to large wilding conifers, and is the primary control method recommended for this Management Strategy. Using this method, mature trees are poisoned by drilling up to twelve holes into their trunks, and injecting herbicide into each hole. The active ingredient is usually 600g/kg metsulfuron-methyl, although glyphosate is also required for species such as Pinus pinaster. Poisoned trees are left standing, eventually becoming a dead spar in the forest that will rot away, with its branches and stem slowly falling to the ground in pieces. For small trees, this is a rapid process, but for large trees may take up to 15 years. This method is now generally preferred to the felling of wilding conifers in forested areas, as felled trees break down a lot of regenerating native vegetation as they hit the ground, thereby opening up a light well on the forest floor. Conifer seeds require high light conditions to germinate, and dozens of seedlings can appear around the felled tree. By contrast, poisoning leaves the surrounding regenerating native vegetation undisturbed, and allows a more seamless transition from wilding conifers to native vegetation. Very little secondary conifer re-growth can be expected where there is an intact native forest canopy around the poisoned tree. Generally, not all pines are poisoned within a control area, as it is generally regarded as unsafe to leave dead or dying trees in locations that may pose a hazard to coastal navigation, the public, public access, public utilities or man-made structures (e.g: in close proximity to power lines, private dwellings, boatsheds, jetties, walking tracks, roads). In these instances, pines would be required to be felled in a controlled manner. Ring-barking: An alternative control methodology for forested environments is ringbarking. Ring-barking has the same advantages as herbicide injection, leaving the surrounding regenerating native vegetation undisturbed, allowing a more seamless transition from wilding conifers to native vegetation. Ring-barking is not recommended as a reliable tree-killing technique in Wilding Control: Guidelines for the Control of Wilding Conifers (Ledgard, NZ Forest Research Institute, 2009). It has been used successfully in the Marlborough 18 P a g e
19 Sounds (L. Dunwoodie, pers. comm.), but to ring-bark thoroughly increases the budget very significantly, with large trees taking up to an hour each, compared to less than five minutes for herbicide injection. Therefore, this control method is not recommended for this Management Strategy, except in the event that landowners do not permit the use of herbicides on their property, Manual control: Hand-pulling seedlings remains the most effective form of control for young trees, and can be safely undertaken by volunteers and untrained staff. Hand-pulling is supplemented by the use of loppers or a pruning saw to cut off saplings that are too large or difficult to pull from the ground. The method is simple and recommended for use, but to be effective it is imperative that all green needles are removed from the tree, otherwise control will not be successful. Felling: Felling with a chainsaw remains the preferred method of treating trees excluded from herbicide injection. Felling must be carried out by a qualified chainsaw operator, and requires excellent health and safety procedures. Where trees are felled, it is imperative all green needles are removed below the cut stump. This usually requires the use of loppers or a tomahawk following felling, and can be supplemented by spraying herbicide onto the cut stump in case some green needles are not removed. 19 P a g e
20 ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF WILDING CONIFER CONTROL METHODS. Advantages Disadvantages Felling Sure of success Leaves a large light gap that will encourage seedling reestablishment. Rapid removal from the landscape. Cost recovery possible in dense infestations via timber extraction. Controlled felling possible, in sensitive areas, such as around power lines. High operator risk trained people required. OSH/DOC requirements mean two people need to work together. Heavy equipment to carry. Expensive. Herbicide injection. Lightweight equipment. Standing dead trees unsightly for up to 10 years. Low operator risk. Small light gap created with low risk of seedling establishment. Use of chemicals. Decay of poisoned trees uncontrolled, making it unsuitable in sensitive areas. Standing dead tree provides habitat for native insects. Standing dead tree may act as perch for birds that spread native seeds. Comparatively low cost Ring-barking Small light gap created with low risk of seedling establishment. Avoids use of chemicals Unreliable results Standing dead trees unsightly for up to P a g e
21 years. Standing dead tree provides habitat for native insects. Standing dead tree may act as perch for birds that spread native seeds. Decay of ring-barked trees uncontrolled, making it unsuitable in sensitive areas. High operator risk trained people required. OSH/DOC requirements mean two people need to work together. Heavy equipment to carry. Expensive. 21 P a g e
22 CONTROL TIMING Control will be optimally timed for spring of each year, as that is the time when conifers grow most actively and therefore are most susceptible to herbicide injection. However, as Pinus radiata shows active growth throughout the year, summer is also an acceptable time for control. Controlled felling, as a follow-up to those trees excluded from herbicide injection, will be optimally undertaken in summer and early autumn. CONTRACTOR PROCUREMENT Professional contractors will be engaged to undertake the work, with procurement conducted in an open and transparent manner in winter/early spring of each year. In the first year, procurement should be undertaken through a competitive tendering process, to establish the size of the likely contractor market and to encourage innovations and price competitiveness. Procurement methodologies in future years will be dependent on the outcome of the first year s procurement and control outcomes. The services shall be performed on an hourly rate for poisoning. Contractors will be required to enter into a written Contract for Services and Project Schedule with KCSRA for each management sector they undertake. LANDOWNER LIAISON & APPROVALS Written permission to enter upon private land must be obtained by Contractors from all landowners/occupiers, using a Landowner Access Consent Form, which forms part of the standard Contract conditions. The form must be fully completed and legible, and should be filled out in person except for absentee landowners. The Contractor shall fully comply with all access conditions stipulated in Landowner Access Consent Forms. Landowners are under no obligation to agree to control on their land and, where access is denied, the property will be removed from the control programme. 22 P a g e
23 HEALTH & SAFETY Health and safety is an important consideration when planning wilding conifer control. The minimum health and safety requirements apply: i. COMMUNICATIONS: All staff employed by the Contractor shall maintain sufficient communications equipment in the field that is capable of immediately obtaining outside assistance should an accident or any other emergency occur. ii. iii. iv. FIRST AID: All staff employed by the Contractor shall maintain and carry a personal first aid kit while in the field. HERBICIDE USE: Personal protective equipment shall be worn during herbicide mixing and application, as recommended by the manufacturer on the herbicide label. TOOL USE: Any use of power and hand-operated tools shall comply with recognised safe work practices, particularly with regard to the use of personal protective equipment, refuelling procedures and maintenance. v. AIRCRAFT: If the Contractor wishes to use aircraft in the completion of the Services, prior approval of the Trust must be obtained. The operator of any aircraft must possess a current Air Operator Certificate or equivalent, as required by the Civil Aviation Authority. vi. vii. BOATS: For access to all control areas, powered vessels are required to be surveyed and operated by a commercially ticketed skipper (LLO or greater). For access within a site, non-powered vessels are permitted, subject to recognised safe boat handling practices. FIRE: The Contractor shall maintain some means of fire suppression while in the field, such as a 420g fire extinguisher. 23 P a g e
24 STATUTORY COMPLIANCE In recommending control methodologies for wilding conifers in Kenepuru Sound, it is vital that the recommended control methodologies meet all relevant statutory requirements. Marlborough Sounds Resource Management Plan: The Marlborough Sounds Restoration Trust obtained a Certificate of Compliance, pursuant of Section 139 of the Resource Management Act, for the same control methodologies being employed in Queen Charlotte Sound, subject to certain conditions being stipulated in written Contracts and Project Schedules. Therefore, it is assumed that the same approach will be similarly compliant in Kenepuru Sound. Conservation Act and Reserves Act: The Department of Conservation, which is responsible for implementation of these Acts, has provided written support for the proposed methodology on public conservation land in Kenepuru Sound. New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS): Under the ETS, the landowner, or the person with the right to deforest, incurs liabilities for the carbon released when pre forest land is deforested. Pre 1990 forest land is land of more than one hectare covered by forest species (either exotic or indigenous)on 31 December 1989 that remained in forest, and was predominantly exotic forest species on 31 December Forest land is considered deforested when the land use is changed from forestry to another land use, such as grazing. However, land is not considered deforested if the land is left to regenerate back into forest, or forest species are planted, where the regeneration meets the following thresholds: 4 years after clearing, each hectare has been replanted or has naturally regenerated with at least 500 stems per hectare of forest species; or 10 years after clearing, predominantly exotic forest species are growing, but each hectare has tree crown cover of at least 30 percent from trees that have reached 5 metres; or 20 years after clearing, predominantly indigenous forest species are growing, but each hectare has tree crown cover of at least 30 percent from trees that have reached 5 metres. These three regeneration scenarios are all likely to occur in the Sounds, under the proposed control methodologies, as pioneer native species do well in the Sounds and growth rates are rapid. Therefore, it is unlikely that liabilities will be incurred in the few situations where more than one hectare of dense conifers are treated. In the event that the KCRSA believes the control of wilding conifers is likely to incur liabilities, it may either apply for a one-off permanent exemption from deforestation if the area of pre-1990 land is under 50ha, or it may seek a Tree Weed Exemption for a particular management sector. Hazardous Substances and New Organism Act: The use of metsulfuron-methyl and glyphosate is certain to certain controls under the HSNO Act. The proposed 24 P a g e
25 methodologies are compliant with these controls, subject to certain conditions being stipulated in written Contracts and Project Schedules. CONTRACTOR MANAGEMENT All work will be subject to quality assurance auditing. For a new contractor, or an existing contractor that has significantly changed personnel, a quality assurance audit shall be conducted within the first two days of commencement, and up to twice more during the term of the Contract. For all other contractors, a quality assurance audit may take place up to twice during the term of the Contract. The quality assurance audit shall ensure that all Contract conditions, including delivery of the Standard Operational Specifications, are being complied with. In the event of there being any evidence of poor workmanship or any failures to complete the Contract specifications to a satisfactory standard, the Trust can either require immediate remediation at the Contractor s expense, or to terminate the Contract. 25 P a g e
26 PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT Management services are budgeted at 24% of the cost of control for each sector. This allows for the following services to be undertaken by a Programme Co-ordinator: i. Managing communications with KCSRA members a. Establish and maintain effective working relationships with KCSRA members b. Ensure KCSRA meetings are adequately reported to and serviced. ii. Managing community relations a. Ensure all landowners and land managers provide access consent before control work commences. b. Ensure effective communications of the wilding conifer control programme with the wider Sounds community. c. Ensure effective communications and reporting is maintained with key stakeholders (DOC, MDC etc). d. Erect signage at key access points for each control sector. iii. Contract management a. Prepare contract and tender documents for each of the control sectors. b. Ensure contracts are tendered and awarded in keeping with established best practice. c. Assist KCSRA members in tender evaluation and tender award processes. iv. Contractor management a. Identify and establish communications with contracting market. b. Convene an annual contractor s meeting prior to tender release. c. Hold pre-operational briefings with successful contractors. d. Audit contractors and deal with any operational issues. e. Advise control completion, in association with KCSRA. 26 P a g e
27 BUSINESS PLAN A central purpose of this Strategy is to document proposed expenditure over the term of this Strategy, and outline a fund-raising strategy. To achieve this objective, a Business Plan has been developed. PROPOSED EXPENDITURE The Management Plan has allocated a budget and score for each management sector, and the Implementation Plan has identified how control should be undertaken. The Business Plan now identifies how the programme should be delivered. In recommending proposed expenditure, the following criteria have been followed: Sectors that have a total score of less than 7 should be excluded from the Business Plan, on the basis that these sectors are low priority for control, and the funds for these sectors could more productively be used in other areas of the Marlborough Sounds, outside the scope of this current Strategy, such as Outer Queen Charlotte Sound or d Urville Island. Sectors that have a score of 7 have been costed, but excluded from the Business Plan at this stage, on the basis that these sectors are also a low priority for control. However, these sectors may be suitable for inclusion at a later stage, depending on landowner and stakeholder commitment to the control of these sectors. Inclusion of any management sector in the Business Plan should be conditional on major landowners indicating support for the proposed control programme. In consulting on the Strategy, only one major landowner indicated a lack of support for the programme, and the two relevant management sectors have therefore been removed from the Business Plan. In some situations, where there are multiple owners, initial support was conditional on further consultation with other owners. In other situations, major landowners were not able to be contacted, and therefore will need to be tracked down prior to fund-raising for the relevant sector. Following these criteria, the Business Plan proposes expenditure of $317,099 (GST excl) over three financial years, commencing July 2011 and concluding in June This expenditure comprises: : $111, : $141, : $ 63, P a g e
28 The following table details the proposed expenditure. Implementation Defer Sector Number Sector Name Total Score CONTROL COST MANAGEMENT COST TOTAL COST 8 Portage Island 11 $ $ 2,390 $ 1, Portage Bay 10 $ 12,438 $ 2,985 $ 15,423 9 Nikau Cove 10 $ 15,499 $ 3,720 $ 19, McMahon East 9 $ 11,362 $ 2,727 $ 14,089 3 Te Mahia Bay 9 $ 13,865 $ 3,328 $ 17, Kenepuru Head 9 $ 17,305 $ 4,153 $ 21,458 4 Island Pt 9 $ 17,912 $ 4,299 $ 22, Shelterbelt 9 $ 24,275 $ 5,826 $ 30, Kenepuru 7A 9 $ 42,665 $ 10,240 $ 52, Sandy Bay 9 $ 47,520 $ 11,405 $ 58, Weka Pt-Ferndale 9 $ 19,253 $ 4,621 $ 23, Double Bay 8 $ 7,003 $ 1,681 $ 8, Stokes 8 $ 11,398 $ 2,736 $ 14, Manaroa Head 8 $ 13,303 $ 3,193 $ 16,496 5 Tara Bay 10 Majority landowner doesn t support. Partial control possible. 2 Broughton Bay 9 Majority landowner doesn t support. Partial control possible. 6 Pukatea 8 Majority landowner doesn t support. Partial control possible. 25 Goulter Bay 8 Under selfmanagement 11 Black Rock 8 Landowner not able to be contacted. 1 Schnapper Pt 7 Low priority. Potential for later inclusion. 19 McMahon West 7 Low priority. Potential for later inclusion. 21 Waitaria 6 Low priority 23 Motu Roa 6 Low priority 28 Nopera 6 Low priority 20 Fish Bay 5 Low priority 24 Waitaria Amenity 5 Low priority 27 St Omer Saddle 5 Low priority 15 Williams Rd 4 Low priority 16 Kenepuru Saddle 4 Low priority 28 P a g e
29 FUND RAISING Funding will generally be sought on a combined Control plus Management basis for each sector, such that the funding for management services be sought as part of the budget for each sector. Where this is not possible, the KCSRA will put up its management services as a separate project for funding on an annual basis. Over the term of this Strategy, two sources of funds are sought Primary Funding and Partnership Funding. PRIMARY FUNDING Primary Funding will be the funds granted as the foundation of any project, and will generally be sought principally from national funding agencies such as the New Zealand Lottery Grants Board, Canterbury Community Trust, Lion Foundation, Sustainable Management Fund and Biodiversity Condition Fund. PARTNERSHIP FUNDING A common expectation of funding agencies is that all community organisations should have done some fund-raising towards the specific project for which an application is being made. In some cases, the community organisation is expected to fund up to 30% of the project total. The KCSRA defines this as Partnership Funding. Partnership Funding will be generally sought from local resident associations and landowners, local business interests, the Department of Conservation and Marlborough District Council. The KCSRA may also undertake its own occasional fund-raising activities. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT The KCSRA proposes to manage its finances in keeping with accepted standards of transparency and accountability. It will provide financial management and reporting in line with the Charities Act 2005, and its own constitution, and will also comply with any financial audit or reporting requirements put in place by external funding agencies. 29 P a g e
30 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to thank the following for their assistance in the preparation of this report: Dain Simpson, Pat Williams (KCSRA); Roy Grose, Willie Abel (DOC); Alan Johnson, Jamie Sigmund, Hellen Munro (MDC); Nick Ledgard (Scion Research Ltd), Rod & Glenn Eatwell, and the Portage Resort Hotel. A special thanks is also due to the many landowners and residents who gave their time and advice freely. Finally, acknowledgement needs to be made to the New Zealand Lottery Grants Board (Environment & Heritage Fund), Department of Conservation (Sounds Area Office) and Marlborough District Council, which jointly funded the development of the Strategy. REFERENCES Strategic Plan for Managing Invasive Weeds (Owen, Department of Conservation, 1998), South Island Wilding Conifer Strategy (Harding, Department of Conservation, 2001) Marlborough Sounds Resource Management Plan (Marlborough District Council, 2003) A Strategy for Control of Wilding Conifers in North Marlborough (Ledgard, Marlborough District Council, 2004) Review of the use of Herbicides to control Wilding Conifers (Raal, Department of Conservation, 2005) Restoring Native Forest to the Marlborough Sounds: A summary of the workshop and field day held on Friday, April 20 and Saturday, April 21, 2007 (Marlborough District Council, 2007) Wilding Conifer Strategic Plan for Inner Queen Charlotte Sound (Macalister, Marlborough Sounds Restoration Trust, 2007) The Ecological Case for Wilding Pine Removal in Queen Charlotte Sound (Walls, Marlborough Sounds Restoration Trust, 2007) Blights and Blots on the Landscape: Wilding Pines in Queen Charlotte Sound (Lucas, Marlborough Sounds Restoration Trust, 2007) Wilding Conifer Management Report for Flock Hill Station, Waimakariri Basin, Canterbury (Woods, Environment Canterbury, 2007) Assessing Risk of Wilding Spread (Ledgard, Scion Research, 2008) Wilding Control: Guidelines for the Control of Wilding Conifers (Ledgard, Scion Research, 2009) North Marlborough Significant Natural Areas Project (Walls & Eade, Marlborough District Council, 2009) Management Plan: Wilding Exotic Trees on d Urville Island, Marlborough Sounds (Macalister, Marlborough District Council, 2010) A Guide to Tree Weed Exemptions (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 2010) 30 P a g e
31 APPENDIX 1: MAP OF MANAGEMENT SECTORS
32 APPENDIX 2: PHOTO SELECTION Figure 1: The natural ecological demeanour of the Sounds, resplendent in diverse native bush down to the shore (Photo: Geoff Walls). Figure 2: The norm today in much of the Sounds, with wilding Pinus radiata well established and increasing where-ever the opportunity exists (Photo: Geoff Walls).
33 Figure 3: A much more advanced infestation, with pines dominant over much of the land, including the rocky shore scarp and the rear of the beach to the right. This situation has developed in just a few decades following the cessation of pastoral farming (Photo: Geoff Walls). Figure 4: An example of wilding pine control on the flanks of Tory Channel. The big old pines have been poisoned standing (Photo: Geoff Walls).
34 Figure 5: These photos, taken 18 months apart on Arapawa Island, show the rapid regeneration that takes place underneath stands of poisoned trees. Shady conditions, increased soil moisture and soil nutrients combine to provide an excellent nursery for native plants (Photo: Nick Ledgard/ENSIS). Figure 6: Beneath the dead pines is growing rich regenerating native vegetation, rapidly forming forest. The slow death and decay of the pines favours this process and prevents re-establishment of pines (Photo: Geoff Walls).
35 Figure 7: The contrast between felling and stem injection is evident here. The felled tree has created a large hole in the forest canopy, creating ideal conditions for further pine seedling establishment. By contrast the canopy is undisturbed around the standing tree, thereby minimising the chance of pine seedling establishment.
36 Figure 8: Stem injection in action. Holes are drilled around the trunk, and a herbicide solution is immediately injected into the holes. No herbicide is released into the soil, atmosphere or waterways using this method.
37 Figure 9: A typical scene on the south side of Kenepuru Sound. Mature pines protrude from a well-established manuka-kanuka canopy. The only remaining opportunities for conifer establishment on these well-vegetated faces are along road edges, access tracks, areas of land disturbance and on upper faces where native vegetation cover is lighter. Figure 10: A typical scene on the north side of Kenepuru Sound. A mosaic of farmland, commercial forestry and lightly-vegetated slopes predominate, with intact indigenous forest remaining on higher slopes. The opportunities for on-going conifer establishment are higher in these areas due to the proximity of abundant seed sources and the lighter native vegetation cover.
38 Figure 11: Many areas of reverting farmland on the north side of Kenepuru have only a light native vegetation cover. Here young pines are rapidly establishing in Te Matau o Maui Bay, with on-going recruitment likely due to the presence of adjacent commercial pine plantations. Figure 12: Pines will establish along rocky coastal margins, even in areas of mature indigenous forest, provided there are seed sources near-by.
39 Figure 13: A particular challenge in Kenepuru Sound will be managing the many pines that have established along the Kenepuru Road. Trees favour the open faces of roadsides but are expensive and time-consuming to remove safely.
Application Form. Afforestation Grant Scheme April 2017 (2018 planting) Property Details. For office use only. Contact person: Contact person:
For office use only Date received: GMS project number: Applicant s Details (the landholder/who MPI will contract with) Agent s Details (if applicable) (the person completing the form if not the landholder)
More informationTrees on farms Growing trees for timber
Trees on farms Growing trees for timber Trees on farms, whatever their primary purpose, have the potential to deliver multiple benefits throughout their rotation. There are many examples where small woodlots,
More informationEuropean Tree Technician
European Tree Technician 1. Definition A European Tree Technician is defined as a person employed in, or aspiring to, junior or middle management, or taking a supervisory role in arboriculture. European
More informationWhat are the guidelines for clearing trees?
Little country is cleared normally, but there may be advantages on the best soils Develop only an area that you can look after. What are the guidelines for clearing trees? Even if it is worth clearing
More informationField assessment, control and identification of common foliage diseases of pine in New Zealand
Field assessment, control and identification of common foliage diseases of pine in New Zealand Field assessment, control and identification of common foliage diseases of pine in New Zealand Lindsay Bulman
More informationNATIONAL REPORT CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
NATIONAL REPORT CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Executive Summary New Zealand has not yet completed its national biodiversity strategy, but work undertaken to date confirms the general direction of
More informationContributing factors to the wilding conifer problem
Contributing factors to the wilding conifer problem Legacy source plantings dating from early 1900s Private and crown land multiple land owners Lack of clear roles and responsibilities Lack of a coordinated
More informationNew Zealand forests - background. Native Beetles in an Exotic Landscape Investigating the conservation value of plantation forests in New Zealand
Native Beetles in an Exotic Landscape Investigating the conservation value of plantation forests in New Zealand Lisa Berndt 1, Ecki Brockerhoff 1 and HervÄ Jactel 1 Centre for Sustainable Forest Management,
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 1 Natural England assesses the condition of SSSIs using standard methods based on a list of Special Features,
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ashdown Forest is an internationally and nationally important conservation area with 2.5% of the remaining lowland heathland in the UK; it is one of the largest open-access public spaces
More informationWoodland Assessment Grant Guide
GENERAL DETAILS PLANNING Version 1/June 2005 For updates and the latest version go to: www.forestry.gov.uk/ewgs 3 English Woodland Grant Scheme Woodland Assessment Grant Guide Purpose ASSESSMENT Woodland
More informationAppendix J. Forest Plan Amendments. Salvage Recovery Project
Forest Plan Amendments Salvage Recovery Project APPENDIX J Lynx and Old Growth Forest Plan Amendments CHANGES BETWEEN DRAFT EIS AND FINAL EIS Changes in Appendix J between the Draft and Final EIS include:
More informationLow-intensity fire burning on the forest floor. High-intensity crown fire
Forest Fires: Answers to 12 Common Questions 1. Is wildfire bad for forests? No. Some forests need fire to be healthy, but it has to be the type of fire that the forest evolved with. Low-intensity fire
More informationSpecies Dataform and Scoresheet for Hedera helix L (English ivy) Dataform and Scoresheet
Species Dataform and Scoresheet for Hedera helix L (English ivy) Dataform and Scoresheet Hedera helix L (English ivy) Native range: Europe Date evaluated: March 25, 2009 Answer Choices Response Introductory
More informationLake Okareka Hornwort Management Plan 2013
Lake Okareka Hornwort Management Plan 2013 Title Title part 2 Bay of Plenty Regional Council Operations Publication 2015/03 5 Quay Street PO Box 364 Whakatāne 3158 NEW ZEALAND ISSN: 1176-5550 (Print) ISSN:
More informationChapter 13: Wildlife and Vegetation
Chapter 13: Wildlife and Vegetation Introduction and Setting Nevada County contains an extremely wide range of plants, animals and habitat types. With topographic elevations ranging from 300 feet in the
More informationNew Mexico Forest Restoration Principles
New Mexico Forest Restoration Principles Preamble These principles were collaboratively developed by a team of dedicated professionals representing industry, conservation organizations, land management
More informationTerms and definitions used in FRA 2010
209 Annex 2 s and definitions used in FRA 2010 EXTENT OF FOREST AND OTHER WOODED LAND Forest Other wooded land Other land Other land with tree cover Other land ) Inland water bodies Land spanning more
More informationROUNDTABLE MEETING ON SUSTAINABLE PALM OIL. RSPO Guidance for the Management and rehabilitation of Riparian Reserves Holly Barclay
ROUNDTABLE MEETING ON SUSTAINABLE PALM OIL RSPO Guidance for the Management and rehabilitation of Riparian Reserves Holly Barclay Riparian reserves (also called riparian buffer zones ) = strips of natural
More informationAG. 350 FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
AG. 350 FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT COURSE DESCRIPTION: A course designed to examine the importance of forestry, wildlife, and outdoor recreation with emphasis on efficient use of natural resources.
More informationWildlife Conservation Strategy
Wildlife Conservation Strategy Boise National Forest What is the Wildlife Conservation Strategy? The Boise National Forest is developing a Wildlife Conservation Strategy (WCS) in accordance with its Land
More informationGENERAL GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEYS IN THE PINELANDS AREA. March 25, 2006 INTRODUCTION
GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEYS IN THE PINELANDS AREA March 25, 2006 INTRODUCTION This document is intended to provide general guidance for use in conducting
More informationELEMENT STEWARDSHIP ABSTRACT. for. Fraxinus uhdei. Tropical Ash. Element Stewardship Abstracts (ESAs) are prepared to provide The Nature Conservancy's
ELEMENT STEWARDSHIP ABSTRACT for Fraxinus uhdei Tropical Ash To the User: Element Stewardship Abstracts (ESAs) are prepared to provide The Nature Conservancy's Stewardship staff and other land managers
More informationChapter 13 Private Native Forestry: River Red Gum
Chapter 13 Private Native Forestry: River Red Gum Mike Thompson State Forests NSW, Deniliquin Introduction Private native forestry in the Riverina mainly relates to River Red Gum (floodplain forests) box
More informationPOLICY REGARDING PEST MANAGEMENT ON CITY PROPERTY
POLICY REGARDING PEST MANAGEMENT ON CITY PROPERTY ID#: 36102 1. The purpose of this policy is to eliminate or reduce pesticide use to the greatest possible extent. The City of Madison agrees with the US
More informationA remnant patch is either:
The removal of native vegetation has been regulated in Victoria under the Planning and Environment Act since 1989. This is not new legislation. It is legislation you should already be aware of and working
More informationGreater Wellington Regional Council BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY. Cover photos
Greater Wellington Regional Council BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY Cover photos Cover photo: Mt Climie, Pakuratahi Forest Contents Executive summary 3 1 Introduction 5 1.1. Biodiversity in the Wellington region:
More informationForest types: Plantation vs natural, and softwood vs hardwood. Geography. Activity information. Background
: Plantation vs natural, and softwood vs hardwood Geography G Practical Lesson Activity information Level: Junior secondary school Years 7 10 Duration: Preparation: Materials: Summary: Approximately 3
More informationNational Environmental Standards for Plantation Forestry. Overview of the regulations
National Environmental Standards for Plantation Forestry Overview of the regulations New national rules for plantation forestry Plantation forestry is New Zealand s third largest primary sector. It delivers
More informationPolicy # Section Biodiversity Policy and Program Development
Subject Conservation Land Tax Incentive Program Policy Compiled by - Branch Biodiversity Branch, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Policy # Section Biodiversity Policy and Program Development Date
More informationRecovery of the riverbank habitats of the River Ter
LIFE+ NATURE PROJECT LIFE 08 NAT/E/000072 Recovery of the riverbank habitats of the River Ter Meadows and orchards (Salt and Girona) Ter2 November 2013 Promoted by BESCANÓ TOWN COUNCIL SANT GREGORI TOWN
More informationChapter 4: The Laying Yard
UNP-25 Shiitake Mushroom Production on Logs Chapter 4: The Laying Yard The laying yard is where inoculated logs are stored while the spawn runs. This may be inside or outside. How logs are stacked and
More informationGuide to safe manual tree felling
Guide to safe manual tree felling INTRODUCTION This Guide has been developed by WorkSafe New Zealand for principals and contractors involved in tree felling operations. The Guide offers some advice on
More informationChapter 30. Conserving Earth s Biodiversity
Chapter 30 Conserving Earth s Biodiversity Chapter 30 At a Glance What Is Conservation Biology? Why Is Biodiversity Important? Is Earth s Biodiversity Diminishing? What Are the Major Threats to Biodiversity?
More informationThen apply herbicide to the cambium layer, around the entire circumference.
Eradicating Eucalyptus, Acacia, and Other Invasive Trees Ken Moore ken@wildwork.org -March 2008 While most of these methods may work by themselves on some tree and shrub species, weedy species almost always
More informationAppendix 1: Forest Carbon Emission Offset Project Development Guidance
The Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations (FLNRO) supports the use of forest carbon management options that satisfy the diverse values that British Columbians seek from their forests.
More informationGoal 2: Recommendations: Timeline Costs Partners. Align policies with the community vision for canopy establishment.
A resilient urban forest that is diverse in species and age distribution, where new trees are planted strategically to optimize establishment, tree health, and benefits. Goal 1: Ensure tree benefits for
More informationMeasuring and monitor changes in regional ecosystem services using Auckland Council s Terrestrial Biodiversity Monitoring Programme (TBMP)
Measuring and monitor changes in regional ecosystem services using Auckland Council s Terrestrial Biodiversity Monitoring Programme (TBMP) Craig Bishop, Stacey Lockie, Todd Landers and Jade Khin (RIMU)
More informationInvasive Species Project Guidance
SPECIES MANAGEMENT Invasive Species Project Guidance Stakeholder Informed Introduction When species are introduced into an ecosystem where they do not naturally occur, the climatic and biological controls
More informationSKIBO PROJECT SCOPING REPORT Laurentian Ranger District, Superior National Forest
SKIBO PROJECT SCOPING REPORT Laurentian Ranger District, Superior National Forest I. Introduction The Laurentian Ranger District of the Superior National Forest is proposing management activities within
More informationSouth Walker Creek Mine Mulgrave Pit Extension EPBC 2014/7272 Compliance Report 30 March March 2017
South Walker Creek Mine Mulgrave Pit Extension EPBC 2014/7272 Compliance Report 30 March 2016 30 March 2017 27 June 2017 BHP Introduction Contents Introduction 1 Description of activities 2 Compliance
More informationLandslip remediation works at Humphery Binjour Road, Gayndah, Queensland
Landslip remediation works at Humphery Binjour Road, Gayndah, Queensland EPBC 2013/6893 Decision of Approval, Australian Government, Department of Environment WICL14184614 Clearing permit, Queensland Government,
More informationPRESCRIBED FIRE IN SOUTHWEST IDAHO
2016 PRESCRIBED FIRE IN SOUTHWEST IDAHO In southwest Idaho, public land managers work to: address public health and safety concerns; treat insect and disease infestations; reduce the risk of severe wildfires
More informationKaipara District Plan: Proposed Plan Change 2 - Fire Safety Rules SUMMARY
Kaipara District Plan: Proposed Plan Change 2 - Fire Safety Rules SUMMARY Kaipara District Council is proposing changes to the Fire Safety Rules in the Kaipara District Plan. Research has been undertaken
More informationLAND AND USE. Figure 2. Land cover in Rhode Island, Forest land. Nonforest land and smaller forest patches predominate in the area surrounding
Mountain laurel Kalmia latifolia Figure 2. Land cover in Rhode Island, 1992. Forest land Developed land Agricultural land Other land Water Source: U.S. Geologic Survey, National Land Cover Data LAND AND
More informationNatural Heritage assessment of small scale wind energy projects which do not require formal Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA).
Guidance Natural Heritage assessment of small scale wind energy projects which do not require formal Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). March 2008 Table of Contents Page INTRODUCTION... 2 DEFINITIONS...
More information2/24/2009. The factors that determine what type of forest will grow in a region are temperature precipitation growing season soil land forms
FOREST FACTS Forestry 37% of Canada's land area covered by forests. Stretches in a continuous band from BC to NL. Commercial forests are forests that could be easily be harvested for timber. Non-commercial
More informationManaging Forests For Wildlife 3/13/2017 1
Managing Forests For Wildlife 3/13/2017 1 Why? Primarily Food. Acorns 142 calories/ounce. 9 grams of fat. 15 grams carbohydrate 2 grams protein Wildlife SuperFood Acorns can compose more than 75 percent
More informationProposed Wildlife Habitat Restoration Project At Walking Iron Wildlife Area August 6, 2015
Proposed Wildlife Habitat Restoration Project At Walking Iron Wildlife Area August 6, 2015 Walking Iron County Wildlife Area is 898 acres situated in the Town of Mazomanie between Walking Iron County Park
More informationNancy L. Young, Forester USAID/USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Forest Management Nancy L. Young, Forester USAID/USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Material translated by: Mohammadullah Karimi, Training & Liaison Officer Afghan Conservation Corps Managing
More informationLiberia Development Forestry Sector Management Project
Questions & Answers Q1: What has been the World Bank s role in the Liberia forestry sector and what has been the impact of the Liberia Development Forestry Sector Management Project? Since 2004, the Bank
More informationCONSERVATION OF ENVIRONMENT ENACTMENT 1996 CONSERVATION OF ENVIRONMENT (PRESCRIBED ACTIVITIES) ORDER 1999
(No. JPBN. 1509/27 Vol. II CONSERVATION OF ENVIRONMENT ENACTMENT 1996 CONSERVATION OF ENVIRONMENT (PRESCRIBED ACTIVITIES) ORDER 1999 In exercise of the powers conferred by section 5 of the Conservation
More informationFire & Fuels Management
Overview Fire & Fuels Management Southern California Adaptation Implementation Plan During a two- day workshop in January 2016, southern California resource managers and regional stakeholders discussed
More informationOTBA. THEME: Forests - Friends for Life
OTBA THEME: Forests - Friends for Life The forest is a complex ecosystem consisting mainly of trees that have formed a buffer for the earth to protect life forms. The trees which make up the main area
More informationForest Biomes. Chapter 9
Forest Biomes Chapter 9 9.1 Objectives ~Describe the characteristics of the coniferous forest. ~Explain adaptations that enable organisms to survive in coniferous forests. 9.1 Coniferous Forests Coniferous
More informationSENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 216th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 5, SYNOPSIS Establishes forest stewardship program for State-owned lands.
SENATE, No. 0 STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY, 0 Sponsored by: Senator BOB SMITH District (Middlesex and Somerset) Senator STEVEN V. OROHO District (Morris, Sussex and Warren) Co-Sponsored
More informationThe Effects of Exotic Forests on Soil, Ground Water, Water Quality, Air Quality and Native Flora and Fauna
The Effects of Exotic Forests on Soil, Ground Water, Water Quality, Air Quality and Native Flora and Fauna Bob Cathcart AgFirst Northland October 2017 EFFECTS OF PINE TREES ON THE SOIL Pine trees have
More informationJOB PROFILE. The principles or values that identify the way we work in the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) are:
JOB PROFILE Job Title: Harbourmaster/ Manager Lake Taupo Business Group: Local Government and Community Branch Local Government Services Reporting to: Manager, Local Government Services Location: Taupo
More informationThe province has been divided into six Fire Management Zones based on common management objectives, land use, fire load, and forest ecology.
Appendix A: Fire Management Zones & Zone Specific Direction The province has been divided into six Fire Management Zones based on common management objectives, land use, fire load, and forest ecology.
More informationDecision Memo Tongass National Forest. Wrangell Ranger District. Pre-Commercial Thinning CE 2010
Decision Memo Tongass National Forest Pre-Commercial Thinning CE 2010 Decision It is my decision to authorize pre-commercial thinning (PCT) on approximately 7,500 acres of overstocked young-growth forest
More informationScottish Forestry Grants Scheme review: Consultation questions.
Scottish Forestry Grants Scheme review: Consultation questions. Use this document to provide your answers to the questions contained in the consultation document. Please use as much space as you require
More informationField Sparrow. Appendix A: Birds. Spizella pusilla. New Hampshire Wildlife Action Plan Appendix A Birds-308
Field Sparrow Spizella pusilla Federal Listing State Listing Global Rank State Rank Regional Status N/A N/A G5 S3 Very High Photo by Pamela Hunt Justification (Reason for Concern in NH) Populations of
More informationMEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AMONG:
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AMONG: U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE U.S. ARMY AT FORT BRAGG U.S. ARMY ENVIRONMENTAL COMMAND NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
More informationINVASIVE SPECIES CONTROL PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND POST CONSTRUCTION MONITORING
INVASIVE SPECIES CONTROL PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND POST CONSTRUCTION MONITORING INTRODUCTION Black Oak Wind Farm, LLC is proposing to develop a wind-powered electric generating facility (the
More informationEarthquake-prone, Dangerous and Insanitary Buildings Policy 2011
Earthquake-prone, Dangerous and Insanitary Buildings Policy 2011 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Objective To ensure that the policy on earthquake-prone, dangerous and insanitary buildings meets the requirements
More informationElectricity Safety (Electric Line Clearance) Regulations 2010
Version No. 001 Electricity Safety (Electric Line Clearance) Regulations 2010 Version as at 29 June 2010 TABLE OF PROVISIONS Regulation Page 1 Objectives 1 2 Authorising provisions 1 3 Commencement 2 4
More informationPractice Plan for Sparta Mountain Wildlife Management Area (WMA) Stand 33: Restore Old Growth
Practice Plan for Sparta Mountain Wildlife Management Area (WMA) Stand 33: Restore Old Growth This practice plan addresses a general activity provided for in year 2017-2018 of the management schedule within
More informationBush Encroachment and Control
1 Module # 2 Component # 4 Bush Encroachment and Control Objectives To understand the threat that bush encroachment represents and to be able to recommend and implement effective control measures Expected
More informationFire & Characteristics of Wildfire
Fire & Characteristics of Wildfire Curriculum Links: Grade 7 Physical Science--Heat and Temperature (HT) Objectives In this lesson students will develop an operational definition of wildfires. They will
More informationAppendix A Silvicultural Prescription Matrix Spruce Beetle Epidemic and Aspen Decline Management Response
Appendix A Silvicultural Prescription Matrix Spruce Beetle Epidemic and Aspen Decline Management Response Treatment objectives within the matrix are a combination of objectives for silvicultural, fuels,
More informationInvitation to Tender Evaluation and Monitoring
Invitation to Tender Evaluation and Monitoring Name Contact Project DerwentWISE Landscape Partnership Scheme, Derbyshire Wildlife Trust, East Mill, Bridge Foot, Belper, Derbyshire, DE56 1XH Tania Pells
More informationSustaining Terrestrial Biodiversity: Saving Ecosystems and Ecosystem Services
LIVING IN THE ENVIRONMENT, 18e G. TYLER MILLER SCOTT E. SPOOLMAN 10 Sustaining Terrestrial Biodiversity: Saving Ecosystems and Ecosystem Services Core Case Study: Costa Rica A Global Conservation Leader
More informationENVIRONMENTAL DEFENDER'S OFFICE (ACT)
Tree protection law ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENDER'S OFFICE (ACT) Significant trees in the ACT urban environment are identified and protected through the Tree Protection Act 2005. The Act creates an ACT Tree Register,
More informationInvestments improving the resilience and environmental value of forest ecosystems
Version January 2014 Sub-measure fiche (annex IV to the measure fiche "forestry") Investments improving the resilience and environmental value of forest ecosystems Measure 8 Article 25 of Regulation (EU)
More informationPrevention and Early Detection
Prevention and Early Detection Prevention, early detection, and eradication of newly introduced invasive weed species is the most economical means of weed management. Prevention is best accomplished by
More information(as amended) Adopted September 5, 2006 Reprint May 2011 BEACH LAND CODE SITE DEVELOPMENT FERNANDINA DESIGN REQUIR CHAPTER. Ordinance EMENTS
EQUIR.05.09 Tree Protection Requirements A. The intent of this section is to provide standards and regulations that will ensure a minimum number of trees on any lot or parcel, protect and preserve native
More informationMurra Warra Wind Farm Project Environmental Management Plan
1. Introduction This (EMP) covers the pre-construction, construction, operation and decommissioning phases for the Murra Warra Wind Farm Project. RES Australia recognises the importance of reducing human
More informationRena Long-Term Environmental Recovery monitoring programme
Rena Long-Term Environmental Recovery monitoring programme About the report Q. What is the Rena Long-Term Environmental Recovery Monitoring Programme? A comprehensive scientific sampling and monitoring
More informationVole Damage Control in Forest Plantations. Hailu Sharew, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Forest Service,
Hailu Sharew, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Forest Service, 8602 Gambrill Park Road, Frederick, Maryland 21702; and Jonathan S. Kays, University of Maryland Cooperative Extension, 18330 Keedysville
More informationTolko Industries Ltd. Athabasca OSB Woodlands 2016 SFI Surveillance Audit
Tolko Industries Ltd. Athabasca OSB Woodlands 2016 SFI Surveillance Audit From January 19-22, 2016, an audit team from KPMG Performance Registrar Inc. (KPMG PRI) carried out an SFI surveillance audit of
More informationAtco Wood Products Ltd. SFI Surveillance / Certificate Upgrade Audit June 2016
Atco Wood Products Ltd. SFI Surveillance / Certificate Upgrade Audit June 2016 On June 13 & 14, 2016 an audit team from KPMG Performance Registrar Inc. (KPMG PRI) carried out an SFI surveillance / certificate
More informationRabbits: A threat to conservation & natural resource management. How to rapidly assess a rabbit problem and take action
Rabbits: A threat to conservation & natural resource management How to rapidly assess a rabbit problem and take action 1 The problem It takes less than one rabbit per hectare to prevent the successful
More informationPeter H. Singleton John F. Lehmkuhl. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Wenatchee Forestry Sciences Lab
Peter H. Singleton John F. Lehmkuhl USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Wenatchee Forestry Sciences Lab Talk Overview: Wildlife community associated with MMC Considerations for wildlife
More informationFIA SFI Summary Re-Certification Audit Report
FIA SFI Summary Re-Certification Audit Report The SFI Program of Forest Investment Associates (FIA) of Atlanta, GA has again achieved conformance with the SFI Standard, 2010-2014 Edition, according to
More informationRIPARIAN LAND MANAGEMENT AND PUBLIC ACCESS DISTRICT WIDE ACTIVITY
SECTION 13.9 RIPARIAN LAND MANAGEMENT AND PUBLIC ACCESS DISTRICT WIDE ACTIVITY 13.9.1 INTRODUCTION The Resource Management Act requires Council to recognise and provide for the preservation of the natural
More information2.4 MANAGING FOR HIGH-VALUE TREES
2.4 MANAGING FOR HIGH-VALUE TREES BACKGROUND Quality timber trees are important to the region s wood products industry. Quality is determined by tree size and the amount of clear, knot-free lumber the
More informationForensic Forestry Reading the Land
Principles of Forest Ecology and Management or Forensic Forestry Reading the Land Jonathan Kays University of Maryland Extension Where Do We Start? Think Like A Plant Act Like A Plant Thinking and Acting
More informationCOASTAL BRITISH COLUMBIA 17
Identification Key for Coastal CMTs The insert that follows is a key that can be used to obtain a preliminary CMT identification. The insert is in landscape format so that the key can be presented in its
More information3-13 Other Required Findings and Regulatory Compliance
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 3-13 Other Required Findings and Regulatory Compliance 3-13.1 Short-term Uses and Long-term Productivity NEPA requires consideration of the relationship
More informationDeveloping forestry practices. Managing for Timber and Wildlife Diversity NATIONAL WILD TURKEY FEDERATION PRE-HARVEST PLANNING:
Managing for Timber and Wildlife Diversity by Joe McGlincy NWTF WILDLIFE BULLETIN NO.15 RON BRENNEMAN NATIONAL WILD TURKEY FEDERATION Developing forestry practices that could potentially benefit all wildlife
More informationManagement Plan for the Trees of the ANU
Management Plan for the Trees of the ANU Features of the ANU treescape The most obvious and valuable landscape feature of the ANU campus is its vast and diverse treescape. There are approximately 10,600
More informationFire Management CONTENTS. The Benefits of Guidelines...3 Considerations...4
Fire Management CONTENTS Fire Management 1 Introduction...3 The Benefits of Guidelines...3 Considerations...4 Planning...5 Burn Plan Development...5 Operational Activities...8 Pre-Ignition Activities...8
More informationFire Regimes and Pyrodiversity
ESPM 134 Scott Stephens Fire Regimes and Pyrodiversity 1) Fire regimes consist of 5 components: - A measurement of fire frequency such as the mean fire return interval or median fire return interval. Fire
More informationSECTION 2. SFI Forest Management Standard
SECTION 2 SFI 2015-2019 Forest Management Standard January 2015 SFI 2015-2019 Forest Management Standard 1. General 2 1.1 Scope 2 1.2 Additional Requirements 2 1.3 References 2 1.4 Forest Management Standard
More informationDRAFT SUBMISSION REGARDING
DRAFT SUBMISSION REGARDING Biodiversity Certification Draft Assessment Methodology DATE July 2010 Opening: The Local Government Association of NSW and Shires Association of NSW (the Associations) are the
More informationCriteria for Biosphere Reserves in Germany
46 Criteria for Biosphere Reserves in Germany In the spring of 2007 the German MAB National Committee adopted the revised Criteria for the Designation and Evaluation of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves in Germany.
More information1. The impacts of development and settlement intensification on biodiversity and Aboriginal cultural heritage;
Your reference Our reference: DOC13/40624 Contact: Liz Mazzer (02) 68835325 Date 8 th August 2013 General Manager Lithgow City Council PO Box 19 Lithgow NSW 2790 Attention: Ms Sherilyn Hanrahan, Strategic
More informationCity of Kingston Tree By-Law Guidelines
City of Kingston The maintenance of mature tree cover is recognized as contributing to human health and quality of life and therefore it is the City s goal to increase the urban forest. Trees are an important
More informationNew Zealand. A Submission to the Ad-Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol (AWG-KP)
New Zealand A Submission to the Ad-Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol (AWG-KP) Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) Introduction 26 MAY 2009
More informationFORESTRY TALK: A GLOSSARY OF COMMON TERMS
FORESTRY TALK: A GLOSSARY OF COMMON TERMS If you re planning to harvest trees in your woodlot or to establish a forest on your property, you may need to communicate with foresters and logging contractors
More informationFire Scars. Appropriate Grade Level: 6th- 12th. Time Required: 3 Hours (Each section can be presented as a 1-hour lesson.)
Objectives 1. Students will describe the historic role of fire in the forests of the Klamath-Siskiyou Mountains. 2. Students will identify fire scars and growth rings on a tree cookie. 3. Students will
More information