Air Quality in Central Texas Final Report- 2011
|
|
- Camilla Haynes
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Central Texas Final Report Monitoring Program Air Quality in Central Texas 2011 Final Report Provided for Lower Colorado River Authority Capital Area Planning Council of Governments Texas Commission on Environmental Quality January 2012 Prepared by Air Quality Solutions, Inc. Rogelio C. Ramon, M.S.E. Final Report 2011 AQSI 1
2 Central Texas Final Report Monitoring Program SUMMARY As part of an air quality monitoring program for the Central Texas region, Capital Area Council of Governments (CAPCOG) and Air Quality Solutions, Inc. (AQSI), in collaboration with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA), operated several Continuous Air Monitoring Stations, CAMS 601, CAMS 614, CAMS 6602, (CAMS 675/1675), CAMS 684, and CAMS 690, in counties surroundings Travis county; Hays, Fayette, Bastrop, & Williamson County. Ozone data collection began in April 15, 2011 and ended on October 31, Measurements for ozone were made continuously during this period, except for interruptions including analyzer malfunction, calibrations, and equipment checks. In addition to the monitoring sites listed above are operated by AQSI, two regulatory monitoring stations are operated by TCEQ in Travis County, CAMS 3 & 38. NO x and meteorological measurements of Wind Speed and Wind Direction were also made at the CAMS 38, 614 and 6602 sites through the sample period. SO 2 and meteorological measurements were augmented at the CAMS 6602 site. The One-hour data summary for all sites in 2011 indicated; the highest one-hour average ozone concentration recorded at CAMS 03 was 88 ppb; CAMS 38 was 83 ppb, CAMS 614 was 96 ppb;; CAMS 6602 was 86 ppb; CAMS 601 was 85 ppb; and CAMS 675/1675 was 99 ppb; CAMS 684 was 86 ppb; CAMS 690 was 91 ppb. The fourth-highest 8-hour data summary for all sites in 2011 indicated; the fourth highest 8-hour average ozone concentration at CAMS 03 was 75 ppb; CAMS 38 was 73 ppb, CAMS 614 was 77 ppb;; CAMS 6602 was 75 ppb; CAMS 675/1675 was 78 ppb, CAMS 684 was 72 ppb, CAMS 690 was 71 ppb; and CAMS 601 was 75 ppb. Final Report 2011 AQSI 2
3 Central Texas Final Report Monitoring Program I. INTRODUCTION Air quality in Central Texas is generally good, however, when cloud cover is negligible and winds are light, the concentrations of some pollutants can reach unhealthful levels. The air pollutant that approaches unhealthful levels over the widest area with the greatest frequency is ozone. Ozone (O 3 ) formed in the lower atmosphere is a concern because it can damage the respiratory system. In addition, as a strong oxidant it can damage materials and harm crops. In order to preserve public health and welfare, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency sets standards for the maximum allowable concentrations of air pollutants, such as ozone, in ambient air. On March 12, 2008 the EPA lowered the National Ambient Air Quality Standards ( NAAQS) for ground-level ozone, from the 1997 standard of 84 parts per billion (ppb), to 75 ppb. Attainment of the ozone NAAQS is based on the 3-year average of the fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentrations measured annually at each regulatory monitor in a given region, i.e. CAMS 3 & CAMS 38. This 3-year average is called the design value. If a region s design value is 76 ppb or higher, that region has exceeded the federal standard and may be designated nonattainment by the EPA. Table I-1 reports the fourth highest daily maximum ozone concentrations (8-hour average) recorded in the Austin area since Table I-2 shows the rolling three-year averages calculated for the Austin area from Austin has historically been in attainment of the 1-hour average NAAQS for ozone. However, with respect to the EPA s new 8-hour ozone standard, it is questionable whether Austin will be able to maintain its attainment status for clean air in the future. EPA may use the previous 3 years of data from 2009, and 2010 and 2011 to determine Austin s attainment status. Final Report 2011 AQSI 3
4 Central Texas Final Report Monitoring Program Table I-1. Fourth highest daily maximum ozone concentrations in the Austin region (8-hour average) CAMS CAMS CAMS CAMS CAMS CAMS CAMS CAMS / *1675 Year (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) * * * * Site Deactivated (CAMS 675)/Relocated to (CAMS 1675) remains in San Marcos. (see map) Table I-2. Rolling 3-year averages of the fourth highest 8-hour ozone concentration averages from CAMS 3 (ppb) CAMS 38 (ppb) CAMS 601 (ppb) CAMS 614 (ppb) CAMS 684 (ppb) CAMS 690 (ppb) Years CAMS 675 /*1675 (ppb) Final Report 2011 AQSI 4
5 Central Texas Final Report Monitoring Program Working in cooperation with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA), and the Capital Area Council of Governments (CAPCOG), Air Quality Solutions, Inc. (AQSI) collected ambient air quality data during the summer of 2010 at CAMS 601 located in Fayette County (Fayette Power Plant), CAMS 614 located in Northwest Hays County (Dripping Springs), CAMS 674 (Round Rock) was re-located in the winter to Hutto CAMS 6602 and is located in Eastern Williamson County), CAMS 675 was re-located in mid September 2011 and re-named to CAMS 1675 and remains within the city of San Marcos in Southeast Hays County, CAMS 684 located in Northwest Bastrop County (McKinney Roughs), and CAMS 690 located in central Williamson County (Georgetown). The both CAMS 614 Dripping Springs and Hutto CAMS 6602 sites were equipped with ozone, and NO x, monitors as well as a multi-gas calibrator and a ZENO data logging system to supplement existing meteorological monitoring equipment. Data capture for the Central Texas region during the 2011 sampling period averaged 89 to 98 % for ozone, NOx & SO2 respectively. The wind directions in Austin during ozone action days are usually from the Northeast, East & Southeast. Due to the position of CAMS 601 to East/Southeast of Austin, ozone concentrations measured at this site provides information on levels of ozone and NO x entering the Austin area on typical summer days. In 2011, the CAMS 601 site remained the only true background site and is located approximately 60 miles east of the Austin/San Antonio metropolitan area. Overall air quality measurements were made from April through October 31, 2011 at the CAMS 601 site. This report will describe the research data collected from all ozone monitoring sites including the TCEQ and CAPCOG CAMS sites in the Austin area. The days in which the wind direction in Austin, during ozone action days, is not from the Southeast makes the entire network of all ozone sites very important in understanding the local influence versus transport from other regions. Additional analyses of monitoring and other meteorological data for evaluating source regions for high ozone measured at the Austin area monitors can be found in the conceptual model done by UT-CEER. Final Report 2011 AQSI 5
6 Central Texas Final Report Monitoring Program II. SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES The objective of this monitoring study was to determine concentrations of ozone and ozone precursors at the CAMS 601 Fayette County site, CAMS 614 Dripping Springs site, New CAMS 6602 Hutto site, CAMS 675/*1675 San Marcos site, CAMS 684 McKinney Roughs site, and CAMS 690 Lake Georgetown. In general overall ambient data was collected from April 15, 2011 through October 31, 2011 at the CAMS 601, 614, 6602, (675/*1675), 684 and 690 monitoring stations. Air Quality Solutions, Inc. was responsible for initial installation, monitoring & monthly calibrations of all the instruments in collecting ambient concentrations of ozone, NO x, and SO 2 and in addition meteorological data at all sites were also collected. During the winter months, CAMS 674 in (Round-Rock) was decommissioned and the equipment was re-located to Hutto, CAMS 6602, CAMS 675 (SM) was decommissioned on September 19, 2011 and relocated to a more permanent site and remains in southern Hays county Data at CAMS 1675 was collected for was from September 21, 2011 through October 31, (see map for all CAMS locations) Table III-1. DATA MEASUREMENT METHODS Compound Method Sampling Time Frequency Ozone UV Photometry 5 min Continuous NO x Chemiluminescence 5 min Continuous SO 2 Fluorescence 5 min Continuous Wind direction Vane 5 min Continuous Wind speed Cup anemometer 5 min Continuous Temperature Ambient 5 min Continuous Table III-2. DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES Measurement Method Detection Accuracy Precision Limit Ozone 1.0 ppbv 0 to 99% + 15% NO x 1.0 ppbv 0 to 99% + 15% SO ppbv 0 to 99% + 15% Final Report 2011 AQSI 6
7 Central Texas Final Report Monitoring Program III. SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND METHODS III.1 Sampling Locations The CAMS 601 Fayette County site is located approximately 60 miles southeast of Austin near La Grange, Texas. The CAMS 614 Dripping Springs site is located approximately 18 miles southwest of the Austin downtown area within the Dripping Springs city limits. The CAMS 674 Round Rock site was decommissioned over the winter months/ the equipment is re-located to Hutto CAMS 6602 and is approximately 25 miles northeast of the downtown Austin area.. The CAMS 675 San Marcos site was re-located, on Sept 21, 2011, to the east of I-35, and re-named CAMS 1675, this new site is approximately 25 miles south of Austin and approximately 2 miles east of IH-35 and remains within the San Marcos city limits. The CAMS 684 McKinney Roughs site is located approximately 19 miles east of downtown Austin area near Bastrop, Texas. The CAMS 690 Lake Georgetown site is located approximately 25 miles north of the downtown Austin area and is located within Cedar Breaks Park. The location of these sites is shown on the map on Figure III-1. The TCEQ reports the daily maximum concentrations from CAMS 3, 38 & 614 sites to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Air Quality Solutions, Inc. (AQSI) installed ambient monitoring equipment provided by CAPCOG/ TCEQ, specifically an ozone analyzer, a NO x analyzer, and an SO 2 analyzer at selective sites as well as a Dasibi 5008 multi-gas calibrator and a ZENO data logging system all provided by CAPCOG/TCEQ. This system, known as the MeteoStar Environmental Monitoring System (MeteoStar EMS), controls all routine measurement functions, including calibrations (as described later in this report). The archived data are available at the TCEQ s web site ( Hourly averages of ozone, resultant wind speed, and resultant wind direction were downloaded daily over the Internet and were stored on a personal computer hard drive. The files were backed-up to disk once a week. Monitoring of ambient concentrations of ozone at all sites, and NO x, and SO 2 at specific sites was performed from April 15, 2011 through October 31, Meteorological data was also collected during this period. Table III-1 presents a summary of the technologies that were used to make the measurements. Sample periods for each measurement are also indicated in Table III-1. Quantitative objectives for data quality are listed in Table III-2. Final Report 2011 AQSI 7
8 Central Texas Final Report Monitoring Program Figure III-1. Ozone CAMS sites in Central Texas 2011 Final Report 2011 AQSI 8
9 Central Texas Final Report Monitoring Program III.2 Sampling Methods III.2.1 Ozone (O 3 ), Oxides of Nitrogen (NO x ), and Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) O 3 measurements were made using an ultraviolet absorption analyzer operating in the range of 0 to 400 ppb. Instruments had a minimum detectable sensitivity of 1 ppb. All connections to the ozone photometric analyzer that contacted the ambient sample were constructed of Teflon, glass, or other inert materials. The air sampling line was equipped with a 0.5 μm Teflon filter placed near the instrument inlet. Nitric oxide concentrations were measured by AQSI using O 3 chemiluminescence. The instrument operated within the dynamic range of 0 to 470 ppb. Operation in this range allowed the instrument to achieve a detection limit of 1.0 ppb. All connections to the instrument that contacted the ambient air sample or the quality control standards were constructed of Teflon, glass, or other inert materials. The air sampling line was equipped with a 0.5μm Teflon filter placed near the instrument inlet. Sulfur dioxide concentrations were measured by AQSI using fluorescence. The instrument operated within the dynamic range of 0 to 400 ppb. Operation in this range allowed the instrument to achieve a detection limit of 1.0 ppb. All connections to the instrument that contacted the ambient air sample or the quality control standards were constructed of Teflon, glass, or other inert materials. The air sampling line was equipped with a 0.5μm Teflon filter placed near the instrument inlet. Only CAMS 3, 38 & 614 ozone & NOx continuous gas monitoring equipment were subject to a two-point span-zero once a day, a three-point span check every two weeks, and a five-point calibration once a month throughout the study period. CAMS 601, (675/1675), 6602, 690, & 684 takes exception to the calibration standards set forth for ozone in the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP). In addition, calibration of a continuous gas monitor was performed after any equipment maintenance or repair that may have affected instrument response or if quality control standards were found to be outside the specific quality control limits. The calibration requires the analysis of four standard concentrations, not including zero, without adjustment of the instrument. All calibration gas standards were from a source of known and documentable concentration. SO 2 calibration was done directly using an SO 2 cylinder. NO and NO 2 measurements were calibrated using an NO cylinder. NO Final Report 2011 AQSI 9
10 Central Texas Final Report Monitoring Program calibration was done directly. NO 2 calibrations were performed by titration of the NO with controlled amounts of ozone. A Dasibi Model 5008 multi-gas calibrator produced ozone used in the calibrations. A minimum of five data points, including zero, spanning the working range of the instrument were used to conduct the calibrations. III.3 Sampling Schedule Air quality measurements were made from April 15, 2011 to October 31, 2011 for CAMS 601, 614, 6602, 675, 684 and 690. Continuous monitoring for ozone, NO x, (NO x not measured at CAMS 675/1675, or 684) SO 2, (SO 2 not monitored at CAMS 614, 675, or 684) wind speed, and wind direction was performed at CAMS 601, 614, 6602, (675/1675), 684, and 690 twenty-four hours a day, every day. Although data monitoring and collection was continuous, some data were lost due to equipment malfunction, routine calibrations, and a few limited data system problems. These limited data gaps are noted in the data volume. Continuous Air Monitoring Sites in Central Texas for 2010 CAMS O3 NOx SO2 WS/WD Temp * 3 *38 ***Ozone Lite Sites 601 * / * TCEQ/EPA sites (all others are CAPCOG/ Ozone Lite Sites) Final Report 2011 AQSI 10
11 Central Texas Final Report Monitoring Program IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The results of the study are organized into sections of ozone concentrations per monitoring site and ozone precursor concentrations when available. IV.1 Ozone Concentrations in Central Texas and Regional Transport of Ozone Daily imum Ozone Concentrations Daily maximum 1-hour average ozone concentrations observed in Central Texas are reported in Figures IV-1 through IV-15, and listed in Table IV-1. The top ten daily 1- hour maximum ozone concentrations in 2010 at CAMS 601, 614, 6602, (675/1675), 684, 690, 3, and 38 were typically between 60 and 90 ppb. The highest one-hour average ozone concentration recorded at CAMS 03 was 88 ppb; CAMS 614 was 96 ppb; CAMS 38 was 83 ppb; CAMS 6602 was 86 ppb; CAMS 601 was 85 ppb; and CAMS (675/1675) was 99 ppb; CAMS 684 was 86 ppb; CAMS 690 was 91 ppb In 2011 the fourth highest 8-hour average ozone concentration recorded at CAMS 03 was 75 ppb; CAMS 614 was 77 ppb; CAMS 38 was 73 ppb; CAMS 6602 was 75 ppb; CAMS (675/1675) was 78 ppb, CAMS 684 was 72 ppb, CAMS 690 was 71 ppb; and CAMS 601 was 75 ppb. Daily 8-hour ozone maxima for Central Texas are shown in Figures IV-16 through IV-31. During the Central Texas year 2011 monitoring program some data was lost due to instrument repairs/replacement, communication challenges, and in some instances logistical challenges. All ozone monitors were audited by a 5 and 3 point calibration check each month and sample filters were replaced every two weeks. *Note: With respect to the NAAQS for ozone, two sites, recorded a 4 th highest ozone concentration of 76 ppb or above. CAMS 614, CAMS (675/1675) ( see chart for all sites), However the 4 th Highest 3-Year rolling ozone average concentration remains within the EPA s clean air attainments status of the NAAQS for Ozone Final Report 2011 AQSI 11
12 120 1Hr- CAMS 601 Ozone Data April 15, 2011 through October 31, Ozone (ppb) Hr /15 5/5 5/25 6/14 7/4 7/24 8/13 9/2 9/22 10/12 Days Figure IV-1. Daily maximum ozone concentrations (1-hour average) at CAMS 601 for the 2011 ozone season Final Report 2011 AQSI 12
13 120 1-hr CAMS 38 Ozone Data April 15, 2011 through October 31, Ozone (ppb) hr /15 6/4 7/24 9/12 11/1 Days Figure IV-2. Daily maximum ozone concentrations (1-hour average) at CAMS 38 for the 2011 ozone season Final Report 2011 AQSI 13
14 120 1-hr CAMS 03 Ozone Data April 15, 2011 through October 31, Ozone (ppb) 60 1-hr /15 6/4 7/24 9/12 11/1 Days Figure IV-3. Daily maximum ozone concentrations (1-hour average) at CAMS 3 for the 2011 ozone season Final Report 2011 AQSI 14
15 120 1-hr CAMS 614 Ozone Data April 15, 2011 through October 31, Ozone (ppb) hr /15 6/4 7/24 9/12 11/1 Days Figure IV-4. Daily maximum ozone concentrations (1-hour average) at CAMS 614 for the 2011 ozone season Final Report 2011 AQSI 15
16 100 1-hr CAMS 684 Ozone Data April 15, 2011 through October 31, Ozone (ppb) hr /15 6/4 7/24 9/12 11/1 Days Figure IV-5. Daily maximum ozone concentrations (1-hour average) at CAMS 684 McKinney for the 2011 ozone season Final Report 2011 AQSI 16
17 120 1-hr CAMS 6602 Ozone Data May 15, 2011 through October 31, Ozone (ppb) hr /1 5/21 6/10 6/30 7/20 8/9 8/29 9/18 10/8 10/28 Days Figure IV-6. Daily maximum ozone concentrations (1-hour average) at CAMS 6602 Hutto for the 2011 ozone season. Final Report 2011 AQSI 17
18 1-hr CAMS 675/*CAMS 1675 Ozone Data April 15, 2011 through October 31, Ozone (ppb) CAMS hr 675/*1675 became on-line & collecting data Sept 21, 2011 thru October 31, /15 6/4 7/24 9/12 11/1 Days Figure IV-7. Daily maximum ozone concentrations (1-hour average) at CAMS 675/ 1675 SanMarcos for the 2011 ozone season. Final Report 2011 AQSI 18
19 120 1-hr CAMS 690 Ozone Data April 15, 2011 through October 31, Ozone (ppb) hr /15 6/4 7/24 9/12 11/1 Days Figure IV-8. Daily maximum ozone concentrations (1-hour average) at CAMS 690 Lake Georgetown for the 2011 ozone season. Final Report 2011 AQSI 19
20 120 Ozone Season Hr Daily imum April 15, 2011 through October 31, Ozone (ppb) Apr 28-Apr 5-May 12-May 19-May 26-May 2-Jun 9-Jun 16-Jun 23-Jun 30-Jun 7-Jul 14-Jul 21-Jul 28-Jul Days 4-Aug 11-Aug 18-Aug 25-Aug 1-Sep 8-Sep 15-Sep 22-Sep 29-Sep 6-Oct 13-Oct 20-Oct 27-Oct 1-hr hr hr 675/ * hr hr hr 38 1-hr 03 1-hr 684 Figure IV-9. Daily maximum ozone concentrations (1-hour average) in Central Texas for the 2011 ozone season Final Report 2011 AQSI 20
21 8hr CAMS 601 Ozone Data April 15, 2011 through October 31, Ozone (ppb) hr /15 6/4 7/24 9/12 11/1 Days Figure IV-10. Daily maximum ozone concentrations (8-hour average) at CAMS 601 for the 2011 ozone season Final Report 2011 AQSI 21
22 100 8-hr CAMS 38 Ozone Data April 15, 2011 through October 31, Ozone (ppb) hr /15 6/4 7/24 9/12 11/1 Days Figure IV-11. Daily maximum ozone concentrations (8-hour average) at CAMS 38 for the 2011 ozone season Final Report 2011 AQSI 22
23 8-hr CAMS 03 Ozone Data April 15, 2011 through October 31, Ozone (ppb) hr /15 6/4 7/24 9/12 11/1 Days Figure IV-12. Daily maximum ozone concentrations (8-hour average) at CAMS 3 for the 2011 ozone season Final Report 2011 AQSI 23
24 100 8-hr CAMS 614 Ozone Data April 15, 2011 through October 31, Ozone (ppb) hr Apr 4-Jun 24-Jul 12-Sep 1-Nov Days Figure IV-13. Daily maximum ozone concentrations (8-hour average) at CAMS 614 for the 2011 ozone season Final Report 2011 AQSI 24
25 100 8-hr CAMS 6602 Ozone Data May 16, 2011 through October 31, Ozone (ppb) hr /1 5/21 6/10 6/30 7/20 8/9 8/29 9/18 10/8 10/28 Days Figure IV-14. Daily maximum ozone concentrations (8-hour average) at CAMS 6602 for the 2011 ozone season Final Report 2011 AQSI 25
26 100 8-hr CAMS 675/ *CAMS 1675 Ozone Data April 15, 2011 through October 31, Ozone (ppb) hr 675/ *1675 *CAMS 1675 became on-line and collecting data Sept 21, 2011 thru October 31, /15 6/4 7/24 9/12 11/1 Days Figure IV-15. Daily maximum ozone concentrations (8-hour average) at CAMS 675/*1675 for the 2011 ozone season Final Report 2011 AQSI 26
27 100 8-hr CAMS 684 Ozone Data April 15, 2011 through October 31, Ozone (ppb) hr /15 6/4 7/24 9/12 11/1 Days Figure IV-16. Daily maximum ozone concentrations (8-hour average) at CAMS 684 for the 2011 ozone season Final Report 2011 AQSI 27
28 100 8-hr CAMS 690 Ozone Data April 15, 2011 through October 31, Ozone (ppb) hr /15 6/4 7/24 9/12 11/1 Days Figure IV-17. Daily maximum ozone concentrations (8-hour average) at CAMS 690 for the 2011 ozone season Final Report 2011 AQSI 28
29 Ozone Season Hr Average April 15, 2011 through October 31, Apr 28-Apr 5-May 12-May 19-May 26-May 2-Jun 9-Jun 16-Jun 23-Jun 30-Jun 7-Jul 14-Jul 21-Jul 28-Jul 4-Aug 11-Aug 18-Aug 25-Aug 1-Sep 8-Sep 15-Sep 22-Sep 29-Sep 6-Oct Ozone (ppb) 13-Oct 20-Oct 27-Oct 8hr hr hr 675/ * hr hr hr 38 8-hr 03 8-hr 684 Days Figure IV-18. Daily maximum ozone concentrations (8-hour average) in Central Texas for the 2011 ozone season Final Report 2011 AQSI 29
30 Table IV-1. Percent Oz Data Collected Date 2011 imum 1-hour average ozone concentrations (ppb) in the Central Texas region for % 98.7 % 90.8 % 99.8 % 99.2 % 98 % 96.9 % 89.4 % / * Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May May Final Report 2011 AQSI 30
31 Date / * May NA 19-May NA 20-May NA 21-May NA 22-May NA 23-May NA 24-May NA 25-May NA 26-May NA 27-May NA 28-May NA 29-May NA 30-May NA 31-May NA 1-Jun NV 2-Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Final Report 2011 AQSI 31
32 Date / * Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Aug Final Report 2011 AQSI 32
33 Date / * Aug Aug Aug NV Aug NV Aug NV Aug NV NV 8-Aug NV NV 9-Aug NV Aug NV Aug NV Aug NV Aug NV Aug NV Aug NV Aug NV Aug NV Aug NV Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Final Report 2011 AQSI 33
34 Date / * Sep Sep Sep NV Sep NV Sep Sep Sep NOL Sep NOL Sep NOL Sep NOL Sep NOL Sep NOL Sep * Sep * Sep * Sep * Sep * Sep * NV Sep * NV Sep * Sep * Sep * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Final Report 2011 AQSI 34
35 Date / * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * CAMS 675 was de-commisioned on Sept 11, and re-located to *1675, ( see Map) data began collection on Sept 21, 2011, Data with * indicates CAMS *1675 NOL- Not on-line NV Not Valid * Offline for instrument replacement, instrument repairs, or communications challenges Final Report 2011 AQSI 35
36 Table IV-2. imum 8-hour average ozone concentrations (ppb) in the Central Texas region for 2011 Date hr hr hr 675 / * hr hr hr hr 38 8-hr Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr 29 NV 36 NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL Apr NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May NOL May May NA Final Report 2011 AQSI 36
37 Date hr hr hr 675 / * hr hr hr hr 38 8-hr May NA 20-May NA 21-May NA 22-May NA 23-May NA 24-May NA 25-May NA 26-May NA 27-May NA 28-May NV NA 29-May NA NA 30-May NA NA 31-May NA NA 1-Jun NV NV 2-Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun NV Jun Jun NA 15-Jun NV 16-Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Final Report 2011 AQSI 37
38 Date hr hr hr 675 / * hr hr hr hr 38 8-hr Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul NV Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul NV Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul NV Aug Aug Final Report 2011 AQSI 38
39 Date hr hr hr 675 / * hr hr hr hr 38 8-hr 03 3-Aug Aug NV Aug NV Aug NV NV 7-Aug NV NV 8-Aug NV NA 9-Aug NV NV 10-Aug NV Aug NV Aug NV Aug NV Aug NV Aug NV Aug NV Aug NV Aug NV NV 19-Aug NV Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Final Report 2011 AQSI 39
40 Date hr hr hr 675 / * hr hr hr hr 38 8-hr Sep Sep NV Sep NV Sep NV Sep NOL Sep NOL Sep NOL Sep NOL Sep NOL Sep NOL Sep NOL Sep * Sep * Sep * Sep * Sep * Sep * NV Sep * NA Sep * NV Sep *43 53 NV Sep * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct *54 56 NV Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Final Report 2011 AQSI 40
41 Date hr hr hr 675 / * hr hr hr hr 38 8-hr Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * Oct * CAMS 675 was de-commissioned on Sept 11, and re-located to *1675, data began collection on Sept 21, 2011, Data with * indicates CAMS *1675 NOL- Not on-line NV Not Valid * Offline for instrument replacement, instrument repairs, or communications challenges Final Report 2011 AQSI 41
42 Daily imum 1-hour NOx & SO2 per site & per day Percent Data Date % 98% 99% 98% NOx C-614 NOx C-38 NOx C-6602 SO2 C Apr NOL NOL 16-Apr NOL NOL 17-Apr NOL NOL 18-Apr NOL NOL 19-Apr NOL NOL 20-Apr NOL NOL 21-Apr NOL NOL 22-Apr NOL NOL 23-Apr NOL NOL 24-Apr NOL NOL 25-Apr NOL NOL 26-Apr NOL NOL 27-Apr NOL NOL 28-Apr NOL NOL 29-Apr NOL NOL 30-Apr NOL NOL 1-May NOL NOL 2-May NOL NOL 3-May 9.2 NOL NOL 4-May NOL NOL 5-May NOL NOL 6-May NOL NOL 7-May NOL NOL 8-May NOL NOL 9-May NOL NOL 10-May NOL NOL 11-May NOL NOL 12-May nv 7.6 NOL NOL 13-May nv 3.9 NOL NOL 14-May NOL NOL 15-May NOL NOL 16-May NOL NOL 17-May 10.4 NOL NOL 18-May NOL NOL 19-May NOL NOL Final Report 2011 AQSI 42
43 Date 2011 NOx C-614 NOx C-38 NOx C-6602 SO2 C May May May May May May May May May May May May Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Final Report 2011 AQSI 43
44 Date 2011 NOx C-614 NOx C-38 NOx C-6602 SO2 C Jun Jun Jun Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Jul Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Final Report 2011 AQSI 44
45 Date 2011 NOx C- 614 NOx C- 38 NOx C-6602 SO2 C Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Final Report 2011 AQSI 45
46 Date 2011 NOx C-614 NOx C-38 NOx C-6602 SO2 C Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep nv Oct nv Oct nv Oct nv Oct nv Oct nv Oct nv Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Final Report 2011 AQSI 46
47 Date 2011 NOx C-614 NOx C-38 NOx C-6602 SO2 C Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct NOL- Not on-line NV Not Valid * Offline for instrument replacement, instrument repairs, or communications challenges Final Report 2011 AQSI 47
48 Top Ten Days With The Highest imum 1-Hour and 8-Hour Average Ozone Concentrations per Site. The ten days with the highest 1-hour and 8-hour average ozone concentrations at the CAMS 601 Fayette County site, the CAMS 614 Dripping Springs site, the CAMS 6602 Hutto site, the (CAMS 675/ *1675) San Marcos site, the CAMS 684 McKinney Roughs site, and the CAMS 690 Georgetown site are listed in Tables IV-3 thru IV-14, respectively. Final Report 2011 AQSI 48
49 Table IV-3. The ten days with the highest 1-hour average ozone concentrations at CAMS 601 Top Ten Days Date 2011 Peak Ozone (ppbv) at CAMS 601 Fayette County Highest 28-Aug 85 2nd 6-Jun 81 3rd 27-Aug 81 4th 11-Sep 79 5th 7-Sep 78 6th 20-Sep 78 7th 8-Sep 77 8th 3-Jun 75 9th 25-Aug 75 10th 10-Sep 75 Table IV-4. The ten days with the highest 8-hour average ozone concentrations at CAMS 601 Top Ten 8hr Days Date 2011 Peak Ozone (ppbv) at CAMS 601 Fayette County Highest 28-Aug 79 2nd 27-Aug 77 3rd 11-Sep 76 4th 8-Sep 75 5th 6-Jun 74 6th 10-Sep 73 7th 20-Sep 73 8th 22-Sep 73 9th 24-Sep 73 10th 7-Sep 72 Final Report 2011 AQSI 49
50 Table IV-5. The ten days with the highest 1-hour average ozone concentrations at CAMS 614 Top Ten Days Date 2011 Peak Ozone (ppbv) at CAMS 614 Dripping Springs Highest 7-Sep 96 2nd 29-Aug 88 3rd 28-Aug 87 4th 27-Aug 85 5th 11-Sep 85 6th 26-May 83 7th 12-Sep 82 8th 3-Oct 81 9th 2-Oct 80 10th 16-May 77 Table IV-6. The ten days with the highest 8-hour average ozone concentrations at CAMS 614 Top Ten 8hr Days Date 2011 Peak Ozone (ppbv) at CAMS 614 Dripping Springs Highest 7-Sep 86 2nd 28-Aug 83 3rd 27-Aug 79 4th 29-Aug 77 5th 3-Oct 77 6th 11-Sep 76 7th 12-Sep 74 8th 20-Sep 71 9th 17-May 70 10th 4-Sep 70 Final Report 2011 AQSI 50
51 Table IV-7. The ten days with the highest 1-hour average ozone concentrations at CAMS 6602 Top Ten Days Date 2011 Peak Ozone (ppbv) at CAMS 6602 CAPCOG Hutto Highest 12-Sep 86 2nd 28-Aug 83 3rd 24-Sep 82 4th 13-Sep 81 5th 3-Oct 79 6th 11-Sep 78 7th 2-Oct 78 8th 29-Aug 77 9th 8-Sep 77 10th 7-Sep 76 Table IV-8. The ten days with the highest 8-hour average ozone concentrations at CAMS 6602 Top Ten 8hr Days Date 2011 Peak Ozone (ppbv) at CAMS 6602 CAPCOG Hutto Highest 28-Aug 80 2nd 12-Sep 80 3rd 24-Sep 79 4th 11-Sep 75 5th 7-Sep 74 6th 9-Sep 72 7th 10-Sep 72 8th 13-Sep 72 9th 29-Aug 71 10th 8-Sep 71 Final Report 2011 AQSI 51
52 Table IV-9. The ten days with the highest 1-hour average ozone concentrations at CAMS 675 Top Ten Days Date 2011 Peak Ozone (ppbv) at CAMS 675 CAPCOG San Marcos Highest 7-Sep 99 2nd 11-Sep 87 3rd 9-Sep 85 4th 6-Sep 84 5th 10-Sep 84 6th 28-Aug 82 7th 25-May 80 8th 12-Sep 80 9th 16-May 75 10th 27-Aug 75 Table IV-10. The ten days with the highest 8-hour average ozone concentrations at CAMS 675,,, Decommissioned on Sept,,, 2011 Top Ten 8hr Days Date 2011 Peak Ozone (ppbv) at CAMS 675 CAPCOG San Marcos Highest 7-Sep 86 2nd 11-Sep 82 3rd 9-Sep 78 4th 28-Aug 77 5th 10-Sep 75 6th 12-Sep 75 7th 6-Sep 73 8th 25-May 72 9th 27-Aug 70 10th 16-May 68 Final Report 2011 AQSI 52
53 Table IV-11. The ten days with the highest 1-hour average ozone concentrations at CAMS 684 Top Ten Days Date 2011 Peak Ozone (ppbv) at CAMS 684 CAPCOG McKinney Roughs Highest 28-Aug 86 2nd 20-Sep 82 3rd 7-Sep 79 4th 22-Sep 77 5th 27-Aug 76 6th 8-Sep 74 7th 10-Sep 74 8th 6-May 73 9th 9-Sep 73 10th 19-Sep 73 Table IV-12. The ten days with the highest 8-hour average ozone concentrations at CAMS 684 Top Ten 8hr Days Date 2011 Peak Ozone (ppbv) at CAMS 684 CAPCOG McKinney Roughs Highest 28-Aug 81 2nd 7-Sep 76 3rd 20-Sep 75 4th 27-Aug 72 5th 8-Sep 71 6th 22-Sep 70 7th 24-Sep 70 8th 9-Sep 69 9th 6-May 68 10th 2-Oct 68 Final Report 2011 AQSI 53
54 Table IV-13. The ten days with the highest 1-hour average ozone concentrations at CAMS 690 Top Ten Days Date 2011 Peak Ozone (ppbv) at CAMS 690 CAPCOG Lake Georgetown Highest 29-Aug 91 2nd 7-Sep 84 3rd 13-Sep 83 4th 28-Aug 82 5th 14-Sep 80 6th 26-Aug 79 7th 12-Sep 78 8th 4-Sep 77 9th 21-Sep 77 10th 30-Aug 75 Table IV-14. The ten days with the highest 8-hour average ozone concentrations at CAMS 690 Top Ten 8hr Days Date 2011 Peak Ozone (ppbv) at CAMS 690 CAPCOG Lake Georgetown Highest 28-Aug 79 2nd 29-Aug 79 3rd 7-Sep 77 4th 11-Sep 71 5th 12-Sep 71 6th 26-Aug 70 7th 24-Sep 70 8th 27-Aug 69 9th 30-Aug 69 10th 8-Sep 69 Final Report 2011 AQSI 54
55 Addemdum-Summary/ Per Site/ Equipment Logistics 2010 thru 2011 At the on-set of 2010, a total of 4 ozone monitors failed within the first 30 days, April 15 th 2010 through May 15 th, 2010.Below is a technical summary for CAMS 614 no Change from 2010, CAMS 601, (Ozone Lite Site), No change from 2010 CAMS 690, (Ozone lite site), no change from 2010, (Installed new Ozone monitor July 2011) (CAMS-674-Round-Rock/ Hutto CAMS-6602) (ozone lite site) CAMS 674-Round- Rock site was decommissioned in the winter months of , equipment relocated & re-named Hutto/ CAMS 6602, the new site began data collection from May 17, 2011 through October 31, The new CAMS 6602 site is augmented with a site calibrator, zero air, NOx & SO2 monitor for CAMS 684, (Ozone lite site,) Internal pump failure and no access due to Bastrop fires from Sept 8 th thru 11, 2011, ozone monitor replaced with spare, Spare ozone failed approximately 2 weeks later,, Original ozone monitor repaired and re-installed on Sept, 26, Met Sensor was replaced June, 2011, intermitting datalogger programming error & hardware interface with the MET Wind-Speed sensor throughout the 2011 from June thru October 2011 (CAMS 675/ CAMS 1675), (Ozone lite site), Internal ozone pump failure on Aug4, 2011 CAMS 675 site was de-commissioned on September 14, 2011 and equipment re-located to permanent location east of I-35, CAMS 1675, data collected from CAMS 1675 from Sept 20, 2011 through October 31, 2011 CAMS 601, (Ozone Lite Site), no change from 2010 Outdoor Temp sensor ( 10m) failure, in July thru August, problem traced to TCEQ zeno datalogger program error within the TCEQ software.. end Final Report 2011 AQSI 55
56 Operator Logs for Fayette County C601 Date Sat Mar 19, 2011 Tue Mar 22, 2011 Sat Mar 26, 2011 Time (CST) 04:13:54 Automatic time sync 04:13:54 Automatic time sync 04:13:51 Automatic time sync Mon Mar 28, :23:59 5 point ozone cal check,,r.ramon-aqsi Log Entry 03/17/ /31/2011 Fayette County C601 (48_149_0001) Mon Mar 28, :02:37 end 5 pt ozone cal ck,, 400=400, 300=303, 200=199, 90=89, 0=0ppb, OTS=27ppb, 5pm..r.ramon-aqsi Mon Mar 28, :04:36 place ozone n k code..r.ramon-aqsi Tue Mar 29, 2011 Tue Apr 05, 2011 Sat Apr 09, 2011 Tue Apr 12, 2011 Wed Apr 13, :07:09 Tue Apr 26, :13:42 Automatic time sync 04:13:43 Automatic time sync 04:13:51 Automatic time sync 04:13:55 Automatic time sync ok4, noise 0.065, total mass , case temp 50, cap temp 50, air temp 50, main flow 3.00, aux flow 13.66, freq ERIC NAUMANN WITH LCRA 04/12/11. 04:13:55 Automatic time sync Sun May 01, :47:36 change ozone sample filter..pmi r.ramon-aqsi Mon May 02, :34:46 Mon May 02, :38:09 Mon May 02, :42:22 The following log entry was automatically generated by the CAMS Site Definition Editor.<h3>The following changes were made:</h3> <pre> Manual Multican Allowed Flag changed from Not Defined to 1 The previous site configuration file has been moved to /opt/leads/release/data/pdcs/pdb/sites/camssite.xml The site configuration file has been updated. </pre> Added manual calibration information for CAMS 601 Parameter: Ozone (EPA Param 44201) POC: 2 Cal Type: 5-point Calibration Cal Status: Passed Cal Reject Back: False Cal Reject Fwd: False Slope: Intercept: G-Level Voltage: Changes made by: ROOT:SYS_ADMIN <pre> Reloaded CAMS data as follows: CAMS: 601 EPA Site: 48_149_0001 Start Date: March 28, :00 UTC End Date: May 02, :00 UTC Set manual cal. Parameters reloaded: Ozone-44201:2 ROOT </pre> Wed May 04, :05:48 on-site to investigate comms problem with CAMS 601,, possible modem error. r.ramon-aqsi Wed May 04, :15:35 re-set power AC to modems, TEOM & ZENO..r.ramon-aqsi
2012 Modeling Platform Performance Evaluation for the CAPCOG Region
PGA 582-16-60851-01, Amendment 3 Task 6.2, Deliverable 6.2.2 2012 Modeling Platform Performance Evaluation for the CAPCOG Region Prepared by the Capital Area Council of Governments November 28, 2017 PREPARED
More informationAmbient Monitoring in Central Texas Quality Assurance Project Plan
2010-2011 Ambient Monitoring in Central Texas Quality Assurance Project Plan Prepared by Air Quality Solutions, Inc. (512) 804-2774 2010-2011 Section A1 A1.1 Preface This (QAPP) is submitted as part of:
More informationCAPCOG Ozone Conceptual Model 2016
PGA 582-16-60851-01 Task 3, Deliverable 3.2 CAPCOG Ozone Conceptual Model 2016 Prepared by the Capital Area Council of Governments September 23, 2016 PREPARED UNDER A GRANT FROM THE TEXAS COMMISSION ON
More informationCAPITAL AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS OZONE MONITORING NETWORK ASSESSMENT
CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS OZONE MONITORING NETWORK ASSESSMENT FINAL REPORT, Task 4.2, Rider 8 Phase III Work Plan Prepared by the Capital Area Council of Governments Air Quality Program February
More informationAir Quality in the Capital Area Planning for a More Stringent Ground-level Ozone Standard
Air Quality in the Capital Area Planning for a More Stringent Ground-level Ozone Standard Written by Bill Gill, Kristin Hebert, and Faith Melgaard, CAPCOG Air Quality Staff August 2008 Air quality in the
More informationSurface Mobile Monitoring in the Austin area for 2011
Surface Mobile Monitoring in the Austin area for 2011 Grant FY 2010/2011 Task Ambient Monitoring Projects Surface Mobile Monitoring Prepared for: CAPCOG Prepared by: Cyril J. Durrenberger Jarett P. Spinhirne
More informationConceptual Model for Ozone for the Austin Area
Conceptual Model for Ozone for the Austin Area Prepared for Capital Area Council of Governments (CAPCOG) P.O. Box 17848 Austin, TX 7876 and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality P.O. Box 1387 Austin,
More informationAmbient Air Monitoring. Wexford. 10 th March st March 2006
Ambient Air Monitoring In Wexford 10 th March 2005 31 st March 2006 Contents Summary....... 3 Introduction........ 4 Time Period........ 5 Siting......... 5 Monitoring Methods....... 6 Results.........
More information2016 Nitrogen Dioxide Summary
2016 Nitrogen Dioxide Summary New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection SOURCES Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is a reddish-brown highly reactive gas that is formed in the air through the oxidation of
More informationUnderstanding the NAAQS and the Designation Process
Understanding the NAAQS and the Designation Process Shawn Seals Senior Environmental Manager Office of Air Quality Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) September 21, 2016 1 Presentation
More information2010 Sulfur Dioxide Summary
2010 Sulfur Dioxide Summary New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection NATURE AND SOURCES Sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) is a heavy, colorless gas with a suffocating odor that easily dissolves in water
More informationTitle: Standard Operating Procedure for Measurement of Ozone in Ambient Air by Ultraviolet (UV) Photometry
Procedure No: SOP-022 Revision No: 1.1 January 27, 2011 Page No.: 1 of 8 1. INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE To obtain timely data for the purpose of air quality assessment, air quality trend reporting, air quality
More informationExample Airshed. Sample 2018 Annual Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report
Example Airshed Sample 2018 Annual Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Report 29 March 2019 DISCLAIMER: This sample annual report is provided as guidance only. The structure, look and layout of monthly and
More informationAmbient Air Monitoring. Drogheda. 19 th Febuary rd January 2003
Ambient Air Monitoring In Drogheda 19 th Febuary 2002 3 rd January 2003 Contents Summary........ 3 Introduction........ 4 Time Period........ 5 Siting......... 5 Monitoring Methods....... 6 Results.........
More informationProposed Revisions to the Operations Manual for Air Quality Monitoring in Ontario
Proposed Revisions to the Operations Manual for Air Quality Monitoring in Ontario Marinha Antunes, Air Quality Analyst Central Region, Technical Support Section Outline The ministry s Operations Manual
More informationMethods for long term NOxy measurements at CARE (Egbert) station. Jan W Bottenheim Environment Canada
Methods for long term NOxy measurements at CARE (Egbert) station Jan W Bottenheim Environment Canada Reactive Nitrogen Measurements 3 sites acquiring continuous measurements of NO, NO 2, NO y TEI 42 CTL-Y
More informationDistributed Generation. David C. Schanbacher, P.E. TCEQ Chief Engineer
Distributed Generation David C. Schanbacher, P.E. TCEQ Chief Engineer Background Federal CAA directs EPA to establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for commonly-occurring air pollutants
More informationAmbient Air Quality Monitoring
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Ambient Air Quality Division Air Quality and Noise Management Bureau Pollution Control Department 7/31/2012 2:09 PM 1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 ) Ozone
More informationWaterview Operational Air Quality Monitoring Report January 2018
Waterview Operational Air Quality Monitoring Report January 2018 Document No: [Subject] Waterview Tunnel Joint Operation nzta.govt.nz/waterviewconnection 1399 Great North Road, Waterview, Auckland 1026
More informationGilleland Creek Intensive Bacteria Survey Addendum. March 18, 2010
Gilleland Creek Intensive Bacteria Survey Addendum March 18, 21 Prepared by: Texas Stream Team Texas State University San Marcos PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
More informationWildfires: Smoke Impacts and Public Health Protection
Wildfires: Smoke Impacts and Public Health Protection Julie Hunter, Senior Air Quality Specialist Washoe County Health District, Air Quality Management Division Great Basin Climate Forum December 6, 2018
More informationCO2, SO2 and NOX Emission Rates. August 21, 2015
August 21, 2015 This page is intentionally left blank. PJM 2015 www.pjm.com 1 P age Introduction In recent years, federal and state environmental regulations have applied or will apply more stringent restrictions
More informationTitle: Standard Operating Procedure for Measurement of CO in Ambient Air by Gas Filter Correlation (GFC)
Procedure No: SOP-024 Revision No: 0 (new document) Page No.: 1 of 7 1. INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE To obtain timely data for the purpose of air quality assessment, air quality trend reporting, air quality
More informationAmbient Air Monitoring. Kilkenny. 29 th April 2005 to 25 th October 2005
Ambient Air Monitoring In Kilkenny 29 th April 2005 to 25 th October 2005 Contents Summary........ 3 Introduction........ 4 TimePeriod........ 5 Siting......... 5 Monitoring Methods....... 6 Results.........
More informationIPS MeteoStar LEADS-EMS. EMS An Easy To Use Air & Water Quality Monitoring & Reporting System
IPS MeteoStar LEADS-EMS EMS An Easy To Use Air & Water Quality Monitoring & Reporting System David Vaello IPS MeteoStar Texas Division February, 2010 IPS MeteoStar IPS MeteoStar (IPSM) is a technology
More informationAir pollution and atmospheric deposition trends in remote areas of North America
Air pollution and atmospheric deposition trends in remote areas of North America Andrzej Bytnerowicz USDA Forest Service PSW Research Station Riverside, CA, USA Ozone Criteria pollutant Toxic to humans
More informationEvaluation and Comparison of Methods for Measuring Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations
Evaluation and Comparison of Methods for Measuring Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations in Ambient Air during DISCOVER-AQ Figure 1. LaPorte Airport site during DISCOVER-AQ Houston 2013. Photo by:
More information2006 Sulfur Dioxide Summary
2006 Sulfur Dioxide Summary New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection NATURE AND SOURCES Sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) is a heavy, colorless gas with a suffocating odor that easily dissolves in water
More informationAdditional Monitoring in the AACOG Region Based on Network Design Analysis
Additional Monitoring in the AACOG Region Based on Network Design Analysis QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN (QAPP) Category III: Secondary Data Project January 5, 2017 Revision 2 Prepared by: Natural Resources
More informationWaterview Operational Air Quality Monitoring Report November 2017
Waterview Operational Air Quality Monitoring Report November 2017 Document No: [Subject] Waterview Tunnel Joint Operation nzta.govt.nz/waterviewconnection 1399 Great North Road, Waterview, Auckland 1026
More information2016 Air Quality Report for the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area
PGA 582-16-60851-01, Amendment 2 Task 1.1, Deliverable 1.1.2 2016 Air Quality Report for the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area Prepared by the Capital Area Council of Governments August 23,
More informationUpdate Conceptual Model through the 2016 Ozone Season
FY16-17 Contract (Grant) # 582-16-60180 PGA # 582-16-60849-01 Task 1.1 Update Conceptual Model through the 2016 Ozone Season CATEGORY III QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN (QAPP) Revision 0 October 19 th,
More informationSecondary Analysis of Photochemical Modeling Data Report
PGA 582-16-60851-01, Amendment 3 Task 6.4, Deliverable 6.4.2 Secondary Analysis of Photochemical Modeling Data Report Prepared by the Capital Area Council of Governments June 15, 2018 PREPARED UNDER A
More informationPrepared by the Capital Area Council of Governments Air Quality Program. September 4, 2015
CAPCOG FY14-15 PGA FY14-1 Deliverable 6.1.3 Amendment 1 Prepared by the Capital Area Council of Governments Air Quality Program September 4, 2015 PREPARED UNDER A GRANT FROM THE TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL
More informationAmbient Air Monitoring. Bray. 21st October th May 2006
Ambient Air Monitoring In Bray 21st October 2005 10th May 2006 Contents Summary....... 3 Introduction........ 4 Time Period........ 5 Siting......... 5 Monitoring Methods....... 6 Results......... 8 Carbon
More informationPrepared for Capital Area Council of Governments (CAPCOG) P.O. Box Austin, TX and
Analysis of the Impact of Reductions in Anthropogenic NO x and VOC Emissions on Ozone Concentrations in the Austin Area using the Rider 8 Photochemical Modeling Episode for May 31-July 2, 2006 Prepared
More informationPrepared for Capital Area Council of Governments (CAPCOG) P.O. Box Austin, TX and
Analysis of the Impact of Reductions in Anthropogenic NO x and VOC Emissions on Ozone Concentrations in the Austin Area using the Rider 8 Photochemical Modeling Episode for May 31-July 2, 2006 Prepared
More informationTRACKING THE GAS TEMPERATURE EFFECT IN A DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
TRACKING THE GAS TEMPERATURE EFFECT IN A DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Eric Kelner, P.E. - Letton-Hall Group, San Antonio, TX Bryan Niebergall, P.E. - Questar Gas, Salt Lake City, UT AGA Operations Conference, Nashville,
More informationCAPCOG Ozone Monitoring Network Review for 2018 Monitoring Activities
PGA 582-16-60851-01, Amendment 2 Task 5.2, Deliverable 5.2.2 CAPCOG Ozone Monitoring Network Review for 2018 Monitoring Activities Prepared by the Capital Area Council of Governments August 11, 2017 PREPARED
More informationAgenda. Background PM2.5 Attainment Plan Public Workshop
2012 PM2.5 Attainment Plan Public Workshop webcast@valleyair.org April 30, 2012 Agenda Overview of 2012 PM2.5 Plan PM2.5 in the San Joaquin Valley Air Quality Trends Emissions Inventory Modeling Analysis
More informationOZONE IN NORTH TEXAS AND THE CLEAN AIR ACT
OZONE IN NORTH TEXAS AND THE CLEAN AIR ACT North Texas Commission Topics: North Texas Webinar Series June 25, 2014 Chris Klaus, Senior Program Manager Mindy Mize, Program Manager Air Quality Planning &
More informationPINEDALE ANTICLE SPATIAL AIR QUALITY SURVEY (PASQUA) MOBILE LABORATORY MONITORING OF OZONE PRECURSORS BOULDER SOUTH ROAD SITE 10/31/ /31/2012
PINEDALE ANTICLE SPATIAL AIR QUALITY SURVEY (PASQUA) MOBILE LABORATORY MONITORING OF OZONE PRECURSORS BOULDER SOUTH ROAD SITE 10/31/2011 03/31/2012 Operational Overview Data Summaries, Data Plots and Data
More information2012 Nitrogen Dioxide Summary
2012 Nitrogen Dioxide Summary New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection NATURE AND SOURCES Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 ) is a reddishbrown, highly reactive gas that is formed in the air through the
More informationCurrent State of Air Quality in PA. January 16, 2018 Citizens Advisory Council
Current State of Air Quality in PA January 16, 2018 Citizens Advisory Council Tom Wolf, Governor Patrick McDonnell, Secretary Agenda National Ambient Air Quality Standards DEP s Monitoring Network Air
More informationNortheast Air Quality Monitoring Assessment: Analysis of Results
Northeast Air Quality Monitoring Assessment: Analysis of Results Prepared by Eric Taylor Air Quality Meteorologist BC Ministry of Environment December 21, 2017 1 2 Executive Summary Government and industry
More informationHow much does Kansas rangeland burning contribute to ambient O 3 and PM 2.5?
How much does Kansas rangeland burning contribute to ambient O 3 and PM 2.5? - Analysis of data from 21 to 216 Dr. Zifei Liu zifeiliu@ksu.edu Rangeland burning smoke management and air quality workshop
More informationOzone Advance NOX Emission Reduction Strategy Menu 2012
Ozone Advance NOX Reduction Menu 2012 Chart Legend Source Point = e.g., large factories, power plants Area = e.g., small facilities, households Non-road= e.g., construction and landscaping equipment, trains,
More informationAtholville Air Quality Report Mobile Air Quality Monitoring Program
Atholville Air Quality Report 2011 Mobile Air Quality Monitoring Program Department of Environment and Local Government June 2012 1.0 Executive Summary The AV Cell Pulp Mill operates two air quality monitoring
More informationNOxy Measurements at Hohenpeissenberg Meteorological Observatory
German Meteorological Service Hohenpeissenberg Meteorological Observatory NOxy GAW Workshop September, 8-9, Hohenpeissenberg NOxy Measurements at Hohenpeissenberg Meteorological Observatory Stefan Gilge
More informationAmbient Air Quality Update for Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee June 15, 2017 Harrisburg, PA
Ambient Air Quality Update for 2016 Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee June 15, 2017 Harrisburg, PA Tom Wolf, Governor Patrick McDonnell, Secretary Agenda 2016 A Year in Review Summary of Meteorological
More informationCompany Y Facility Z. Sample January 2019 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report. EPEA Approval Number
Company Y Facility Z Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report EPEA Approval Number -- 15 February 219 Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 1 of 4 DISCLAIMER:
More informationNew 2015 Ozone Standard and Implications. July 2016
New 2015 Ozone Standard and Implications July 2016 What is Ozone? Ground level ozone is formed from the mixture of sunlight, NOx and VOC. 2 Effects of Ground Level Ozone 3 Effects of Ground Level Ozone
More informationMonitoring for Round 2 Review and Assessment. Sean Christiansen 33 RD IAPSC Conference 4 December 2002
Monitoring for Round 2 Review and Assessment Sean Christiansen 33 RD IAPSC Conference 4 December 2002 Focus of this session: Focus on: Problem areas associated with monitoring during 1 st Round of Review
More informationFpollutant-free zero air for analytical
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring System AQMS-100 Zero Air Generator PI AQMS-100 provides ultra pure Fpollutant-free zero air for analytical purpose. Remote monitoring and configuration can also be achieved
More informationAmbient Air Quality in Nova Scotia
Ambient Air Quality in Nova Scotia Science Forum on Air Quality March 8, 2006 Fran Di Cesare, Data Manager Air Quality Branch, Nova Scotia Environment and Labour What is the quality of the air in Nova
More informationLab 7 Measurement of Ozone
Georgia Institute of Technology School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences EAS 4641 Spring 2007 Lab 7 Measurement of Ozone Purpose of Lab 7: In this lab you will measure the ambient concentration of ozone
More informationDoes Ozone Carryover Affect Day-of-the-Week Phenomena?
Does Ozone Carryover Affect Day-of-the-Week Phenomena? For this to be true, carryover of ozone, apparent in changes of ozone concentrations aloft from one day to the next, should experience day-of-the-week
More informationAPPENDIX 3B AIR QUALITY MONITORING DATA
APPENDIX 3B AIR QUALITY MONITORING DATA 2017 Annual Review Wilpinjong Coal Mine Appendix 3B Air Quality Monitoring Data Summary of Annual Average Dust Deposition EPL 12425 ID No. 3 4-6 - 9 10 11 12 26
More informationCompany Y Facility Z. Sample 2018 Annual Industrial Air Monitoring Report. EPEA Approval Number March 2019
Company Y Facility Z Sample 2018 Annual Industrial Air Monitoring Report EPEA Approval Number 000-00-00 12 March 2019 Sample 2018 Annual Industry Air Monitoring Report Page 1 of 29 DISCLAIMER: This sample
More informationBig, Beautiful Sky: The State and Future of Texas Air
# 25 Big, Beautiful Sky: The State and Future of Texas Air Dr. David Allen September 5, 2003 Produced by and for Hot Science - Cool Talks by the Environmental Science Institute. We request that the use
More informationLab 6 Measurement of Ozone
Georgia Institute of Technology School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences EAS 4641 Spring 2008 Lab 6 Measurement of Ozone Purpose of Lab 6: In this lab you will measure the ambient concentration of ozone
More informationCompany Y Facility Z. Sample 2018 Annual Industrial Air Monitoring Report. EPEA Approval Number March 2019
Company Y Facility Z Sample 2018 Annual Industrial Air Monitoring Report EPEA Approval Number 000-00-00 12 March 2019 Sample 2018 Annual Industry Air Monitoring Report Page 1 of 29 DISCLAIMER: This sample
More informationITEM 5 DRAFT LETTER TO CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION FROM CAC JURISDICTIONS. Intended audience:
Intended audience: Senator John Cornyn (Texas, R) Senator Ted Cruz (Texas, R) Representative Michael McCaul (District 10, R) Representative Bill Flores (District 17, R) Representative Lamar Smith (District
More informationTransfield Services Limited
Eastlink Ambient Air Quality Monitoring NATA Accreditation No: 14184 Eastlink Ambient Air Quality Monitoring System Report 1 st June 2010 30 th June 2010 Report issue date: 15 th July 2010 Maintenance
More informationNational Ambient Air Quality Standards
Modeling Issues with the New National Ambient Air Quality Standards James Red Oris Solutions / BEE-Line Software Presented to North Texas Chapter of the Air & Waste Management Association August 24, 2010
More informationPortable Ozone Systems for Survey Monitoring (POMS)
Portable Ozone Systems for Survey Monitoring (POMS) John D. Ray National Park Service, Air Resources Division, Denver, CO Topics to cover: me Introduction Portable O3 system basics QA/QC and performance
More information2010 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
1 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL Monitoring Report for Lake and Geauga Counties Lake County General Health District 33 Mill Street Painesville, Ohio 4477 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 1 STATE AND FEDERAL AIR
More informationUnited States District Court Corpus Christi Air Monitoring and Surveillance Camera Network Project Quality Assurance Project Plan
Section A1 A1.1 Preface This (QAPP) is submitted in partial fulfillment of the Corpus Christi Air Monitoring and Surveillance Camera Installation and Operation Project contract issued by the U.S. District
More informationMerrill Field Lead Monitoring Report
Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Human Services December 2012 Merrill Field Lead Monitoring Report Overview Merrill Field was selected by EPA as one 15 airports nationwide for inclusion
More informationAmbient Air Monitoring. Kilkitt, Co. Monaghan. 11 th September th March 2003
Ambient Air Monitoring In Kilkitt, Co. Monaghan 11 th September 2002 4 th March 2003 Contents Summary........ 3 Introduction........ 4 Time Period........ 5 Siting......... 5 Monitoring Methods.......
More informationNeighborhood Air Toxics Modeling Project For Houston and Corpus Christi Case # 2:11-MC Phase 1B Monitoring Network Extension
Neighborhood Air Toxics Modeling Project For Houston and Corpus Christi Case # 2:11-MC-00044 Phase 1B Monitoring Network Extension Quarterly Report for the Period October 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015
More informationOptimizing the Design of Air Pollution Control Measures to Improve Human Health
Optimizing the Design of Air Pollution Control Measures to Improve Human Health James J. Schauer, PhD, PE, MBA Professor Impacts of Air Pollution Human Health Acute and Chronic impacts Human Welfare Visibility
More informationAppendix A. Ambient 1-hour Ozone Data Analysis Plan for the Revoked 1-hour Ozone Standard SJVUAPCD
Appendix A Ambient 1-hour Ozone Data Analysis 2013 Plan for the Revoked 1-hour Ozone Standard SJVUAPCD Appendix A: Ambient 1-hour Ozone Data Analysis This page intentionally blank. Appendix A: Ambient
More informationCity of Fredericksburg Water Supply Update
City of Fredericksburg Water Supply Update March 2, 2015 Todays Presentation City of Fredericksburg 1. Local Drought and Water Supply 2. Water Conservation Efforts Measurable Results 3. Future Water Supply
More informationFinal Revisions to the Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 )
Final Revisions to the Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 ) General Overview Office of Air and Radiation Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards January 2010
More informationFundamentals of Transmission Operations
Fundamentals of Transmission Operations Equipment Outages PJM State & Member Training Dept. Objectives At the end of this presentation the Learner will be able to: Identify how weather may influence outage
More informationReal time Water Quality Monitoring
Real time Water Quality Monitoring Robert Schuster New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Water Monitoring and Standards Bureau of Marine Water Monitoring Presented at NJWMCC Meeting September
More informationGSA Regional Sustainability Council Meeting September 13, Bailey Muller, Senior Air Quality Planner North Central Texas Council of Governments
GSA Regional Sustainability Council Meeting September 13, 2018 Bailey Muller, Senior Air Quality Planner North Central Texas Council of Governments WHO AND WHAT IS NCTCOG? Voluntary association of local
More informationOzone 101. Maricopa County Air Quality Department. September 4, Tom Moore WRAP Air Quality Program Manager WESTAR Council
Ozone 101 Maricopa County Air Quality Department September 4, 2014 Tom Moore WRAP Air Quality Program Manager WESTAR Council 1 Ozone is an air pollutant of concern, regulated under the Clean Air Act High
More informationAmbient Air Monitoring
Ambient Air Monitoring At Newbridge, Co. Kildare 1 st October 2009 24 th May 2010 Contents Summary........ 3 Introduction........ 4 Time Period........ 5 Siting......... 5 Monitoring Methods....... 6 Results.........
More informationFinal Ozone NAAQS - PAMS and Enhanced Monitoring Plans- Ambient Air Monitoring in NESCAUM
Final Ozone NAAQS - PAMS and Enhanced Monitoring Plans- Ambient Air Monitoring in NESCAUM Robert Judge Air Monitoring Coordinator EPA- Region 1 Providence, RI December 7, 2016 1 Overview 2015 Final Ozone
More informationSwansea Ambient Air Monitoring Station (SAMS) 4 th Quarter PY2017 Air Quality Data Report
Swansea Ambient Air Monitoring Station (SAMS) 4 th Quarter PY2017 Air Quality Data Report Prepared for the Colorado Department of Transportation and the, Department of Environmental Health Airtech/Montrose
More information2012 Sulfur Dioxide Summary
2012 Sulfur Dioxide Summary New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection NATURE AND SOURCES Sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) is a heavy, colorless gas with a suffocating odor that easily dissolves in water
More informationTexas Watch Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Program 2006 Mary s Creek Data Summary
Texas Watch Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Program 26 Mary s Creek Data Summary Narrative Summary of Mary s Creek Mary s Creek is an unclassified, perennial stream flowing 6 miles southwest from Pearland,
More information2015 Sulfur Dioxide Summary
2015 Sulfur Dioxide Summary New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection SOURCES Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a heavy, colorless gas with a suffocating odor that easily dissolves in water to form sulfuric
More informationGila River Indian Community 2016 AMBIENT AIR MONITORING NETWORK REVIEW
Gila River Indian Community 2016 AMBIENT AIR MONITORING NETWORK REVIEW GRIC San Tan Mountains to the north, 2016 Gila River Indian Community Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Air Monitoring
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF AIR QUALITY AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING REPORT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF AIR QUALITY 1998 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING REPORT DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY MONITORING 400 MARKET STREET HARRISBURG, PA
More informationPasadena Citizen s Advisory Council 2018 Ambient Air Monitoring Report
Pasadena Citizen s Advisory Council 2018 Ambient Air Monitoring Report Bradley Flowers, Ph. D. Project Manager Network 1 Purpose is a voluntary industry-funded technical resource dedicated to performing
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA STATE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD REGULATIONS FOR THE CONTROL AND ABATEMENT OF AIR POLLUTION
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA STATE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD REGULATIONS FOR THE CONTROL AND ABATEMENT OF AIR POLLUTION 9VAC5 CHAPTER 30. AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS. 9VAC5-30-10. General. 9VAC5-30-15.
More informationEVE 402/502 Air Pollution Generation and Control. Background. Background. 1. Introduction to Particulate Matter 2. Real (old) data in Atlanta
EVE 42/2 Air Pollution Generation and Control 1. Introduction to Particulate Matter 2. Real (old) data in Atlanta Background What is PM 2.? Solid (or liquid) particles with aerodynamic diameters < 2. mm
More informationAnnual State of Drinking Water Quality Report
Annual State of Drinking Water Quality Report 2009 Reporting Briefing to Operating Board June 2010 Presentation Overview Regulatory Status Source Raw Water Quality Source Treatment (Cedar & Tolt Supplies)
More informationCO2, SO2 and NOX Emission Rates. March 15, 2018
March 15, 2018 This page is intentionally left blank. PJM 2018 www.pjm.com 1 P age Introduction To support the efforts of regulators, stakeholders, and other interested parties as they work towards achieving
More informationPotential Impact of Biomass Burning on Urban Air Quality: Case-study of Chiang Mai
Potential Impact of Biomass Burning on Urban Air Quality: Case-study of Chiang Mai Sébastien Bonnet, Narongchai Suwanprik and Savitri Garivait The Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment Chiang
More informationThe Impacts of Climate Change on Portland s Water Supply
The Impacts of Climate Change on Portland s Water Supply Richard Palmer and Margaret Hahn University of Washington Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Joe Dvorak, Dennis Kessler, Azad Mohammadi
More informationState Implementation Plans for Federal 8-Hour Ozone and PM2.5 Standards San Joaquin Valley Eastern Kern County
State Implementation Plans for Federal 8-Hour Ozone and PM2.5 Standards San Joaquin Valley Eastern Kern County Public Meeting January 4, 2005 Fresno, Bakersfield, Modesto 1 San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution
More informationMonthly Report: Richmond Community Air Monitoring Program. Report Number: RCAMP_MO_2 Date: May 2013
Monthly Report: Richmond Community Air Monitoring Program Report Number: RCAMP_MO_2 Date: May 2013 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 1 REPORT DOCUMENT CONTROL... 5 2 INTRODUCTION...
More informationApril Mike Taylor
2015 Ozone Standards and Current and Potential Shortage of Emission Reduction Credits April 2018 Mike Taylor 945 McKinney Street, Suite 561 Houston, Texas 77002 mtaylor@emissionadvisors.com 8-Hour Ozone
More informationAmbient Air Monitoring
Ambient Air Monitoring At Shannon, Co. Clare 15 th March 2011 18 th July 2012 Contents Summary........ 3 Introduction........ 4 Time Period........ 5 Siting......... 5 Monitoring Methods....... 6 Results.........
More informationEPA s Proposed Ozone NAAQS Revision: Example Comments for State Environmental Regulators
EPA s Proposed Ozone NAAQS Revision: Example Comments for State Environmental Regulators I. Overview of Potential Comment Topics 1. The current 75 parts per billion (ppb) ozone standard is adequate and
More informationAmbient Air Quality and noise Measurements Report Gas pressure reduction station in Marsa Matrouh Governorate
Ambient Air Quality and noise Measurements Report Gas pressure reduction station in Marsa Matrouh Governorate CONTENTS CONTENTS 1 1. INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 Objectives... 2 1.2 Scope of Work... 3 1.2.1 Sampling
More information