PA Vapor Intrusion Guidance
|
|
- Sheena Hubbard
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PA Vapor Intrusion Guidance Society of Women Environmental Professionals Capital Chapter November 10, 2016 Presented by: Carolyn Fair - Land Recycling Program PA Department of Environmental Protection 1
2 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Overview of Vapor Intrusion (VI) Update History of the VI Guidance Implementation of new guidance Comparison of the new guidance to the previous version Importance of considering VI Discussion of key components of new guidance 2
3 History Vapor Intrusion Guidance Previous VI Guidance from 2004 VI Guidance workgroup formed in 2011 Collaboration of PA DEP and Cleanup Standards Scientific Advisory Board (CSSAB) Published November 19, day Implementation period Effective January 18,
4 New Evaluating Vapor Intrusion the VI Pathway Guidance Implementation of New Guidance For projects mid-stream: Reports approved by the Department will not need to be resubmitted 2004 guidance applies if a final report or remedial action completion report has been received by the Department prior to the effective date of the new guidance New guidance applies if RI of SCR will be submitted following the effective date 4
5 Evaluating 2004 VI the Guidance VI Pathway Limitations Outdated soil and groundwater VI screening values Limited options if data did not screen out VI Modeling guidance is limited No distinction between petroleum and non-petroleum VI Minimal sampling guidance Addressed only existing buildings 5
6 What Has Changed Changes *Improved method of calculating screening values accurate, more protective, more aligned with EPA *Added discussion of petroleum VI *More screening options sub-slab and near-source soil gas 6
7 What Has Changed Changes *Added detailed sampling guidance *Explanation of Site Specific process, combination of standards *Added consideration of future inhabited buildings *Added Modeling guidance 7
8 Evaluating What Has the Changed VI Pathway Addressing Future Buildings * Planned future buildings treated the same as existing buildings VI must be addressed Use near-source soil gas sampling, AULs, and modeling * Unplanned buildings can be addressed with an activity and use limitation (AUL) at the remediator s discretion; is not required 8
9 Evaluating Vapor Intrusion the VI Overview Pathway Why do we care about Vapor Intrusion? Volatile substances in soil or groundwater can result in vapor phase intrusion of these substances into inhabited buildings, posing a threat to human health. This guidance details how to evaluate the threat under the Statewide Health Standard (SHS) and the Site-Specific Standard (SSS). 9
10 Evaluating Vapor Intrusion the VI Overview Pathway What is Vapor Intrusion? VI is a pathway between contamination of a volatile substance and a receptor in a building VI is not a medium like soil and groundwater Primarily associated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and some semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) 10
11 Evaluating Vapor Intrusion the VI Overview Pathway 11
12 Key Terms Hydrogeologic Zones Potential VI Source Acceptable Soil Point of Application (POA) Separate Phase Liquid (SPL) Proximity Distance Preferential Pathway 12
13 Evaluating the VI Pathway Hydrogeologic Zones 13
14 Evaluating Potential the VI VI Source Pathway Potential VI Source Identifies the areas of a site where VI should be addressed Can be addressed through Alternative assessment options Remediation Mitigation AUL 14
15 Evaluating Acceptable the VI Soil Pathway Acceptable Soil or Soil-like Material Unconsolidated material in the vadose zone above a potential VI source that does not exceed the saturated hydraulic conductivity of sand or air-filled porosity of silt Fill material that is soil-like Soils and fill coarser than sand or with airfilled porosity greater than silt may not be acceptable soil 15
16 Evaluating Acceptable the VI Soil Pathway Why is acceptable soil important? Presence Impacts the: o use of groundwater screening values o use of vertical proximity distances o application of separation distances for preferential pathways 16
17 POA Evaluating Point of the Application VI Pathway Location in buildings and in the hydrogeologic zones where screening values are applied POAs guide the selection of sampling locations 17
18 Evaluating the VI Pathway Point of Application SV SOIL SV GW SV IA SV SS SV NS Soil Screening Value (SV) Groundwater SV Indoor Air SV Sub-slab SV Near-source SV 18
19 Evaluating the VI Pathway Point of Application Purpose of VI intrusion screening: Determine if a Potential VI source is present Screen pathway from source to receptor 19
20 SPL Evaluating Separate the Phase VI Pathway Liquid o Comprised of non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) o Present in the void space in a contaminated medium (soil or bedrock) o Physically separate from the portion of the substances that are adsorbed onto or diffused into soil, bedrock, water or air 20
21 Separate Phase Liquid The presence of SPL limits the applicability of screening values, and limits modeling. 21
22 Evaluating Proximity the Distances VI Pathway Proximity Distance Minimum distance between VI source and a building beyond which the source may not pose a potential unacceptable VI risk. o Applies to current and planned future buildings o Cannot be used if a preferential pathway is present 22
23 Evaluating Proximity the Distances VI Pathway Horizontal: 30 feet for petroleum substances 100 feet for non-petroleum substances Vertical: 5 feet for petroleum adsorbed-phase or dissolved-phase 15 feet for SPL None for non-petroleum substances 23
24 Use of Proximity Distances 24
25 Evaluating Preferential the Pathways VI Pathway Preferential Pathway A natural or man-made feature that enhances vapor migration from a VI source to a building The feature must be close to both the contamination and the building and have sufficient volume in order to be a preferential pathway Two types: External Preferential Pathway Significant Foundation Opening 25
26 Preferential Pathways Evaluating the VI Pathway 26
27 Statewide Health Standard VI Evaluation Process Start Here Conceptual Site Model Delineate Contamination DELINEATE POTENTIAL VI SOURCES Soil and Groundwater Screening ALTERNATIVE VI ASSESSMENT OPTIONS Near-Source Soil Gas Screening Sub-Slab Soil Gas Screening Indoor Air Screening Vapor Intrusion Modeling MITIGATION Environmental Covenant SCREEN FOR POTENTIAL VI SOURCES Identify Preferential Pathways Apply Proximity Distances Mitigation, Remediation, or Use of the Site-Specific Standard are Permitted at Any Time ADDRESS CH. 250 REQUIREMENTS No further VI analysis is necessary. REMEDIATION Reevaluate the VI Pathway SITE-SPECIFIC STANDARD 27
28 Evaluating Mitigation the VI Pathway When Can Mitigation be Done? At any time during the evaluation Eliminates the complete pathway between contamination and the receptor Sub-Slab Depressurization System Vapor Barrier 28
29 Mitigation System Eliminates the complete pathway between contamination and the receptor 29
30 Evaluating Remediation the VI Pathway When Can Remediation be Done? At any time during the evaluation Remediation should result in resampling and reevaluation 30
31 Evaluating the VI Pathway Environmental covenants Required for active mitigation (engineering control) Required for institutional controls for future use: prohibiting new buildings or basements requiring a VI evaluation for new construction requiring mitigation for new construction for the ongoing applicability of an OSHA program 31
32 VI Sampling Sampling Guidance Detailed guidance for collecting nearsource soil gas, sub-slab soil gas, and indoor air samples Sampling Materials Sampling Locations Number of samples 32
33 VI Sampling Sampling Guidance At least two locations per building At least two rounds, at least 45 days apart For indoor air, the indoor temperature should be at least 15 F greater than the outdoor temperature 33
34 Questions? 34
August Vapor Intrusion Guidance FAQs
August 2017 2017 Vapor Intrusion Guidance FAQs Topics: A. General B. Effect of New Guidance on In-Process Sites C. Future Use of Site D. Modeling E. Off-Site Properties F. Preferential Pathways G. Proximity
More informationBest management practices for vapor investigation and building mitigation decisions
www.pca.state.mn.us Best management practices for vapor investigation and building mitigation decisions Purpose This best management practices (BMPs) document describes the processes used to conduct vapor
More informationThe IAQ/Mold Assessment Getting it Right! Controlling Your Risk
EBC Seminar The IAQ/Mold Assessment Getting it Right! Controlling Your Risk Next Speaker Rosemary McCafferty Haley & Aldrich, Inc. Outline Vapor Intrusion Overview Vapor Intrusion Sampling Vapor Intrusion
More informationProposed MCP Amendments
Gerard Martin, Chief Compliance, Enforcement and Brownfields Redevelopment Section MassDEP, Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup Southeast Regional Office September 27, 2013 Proposed MCP Amendments Process Improvements:
More informationAn RT Regulatory Program Summary
An RT Regulatory Program Summary NJDEP ISSUES DRAFT VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE In mid-june, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection issued draft Vapor Intrusion Guidance, which is very important,
More informationProposed Changes to EPA s Spreadsheet Version of Johnson & Ettinger Model (and some new spreadsheet tools)
Proposed Changes to EPA s Spreadsheet Version of Johnson & Ettinger Model (and some new spreadsheet tools) Workshop Integrating Observed & Modeled Vapor Attenuation The 15th Annual AEHS West Coast Conference,
More informationNJDEP Vapor Intrusion Guidance
NEW JERSEY VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE Kenneth J. Kloo, Brownfield Administrator ASTSWMO 2008 Mid-Year Meeting Mobile, Alabama April 23 & 24, 2008 NJDEP Vapor Intrusion Guidance VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE NEW
More information2. Appendix Y: Vapor Intrusion Modeling Requirements (Appendix to Statewide health standard VI guidance in the Technical Guidance Manual)
2. Appendix Y: Vapor Intrusion Modeling Requirements (Appendix to Statewide health standard VI guidance in the Technical Guidance Manual) DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 19 June 2014 The Department
More informationVapor Intrusion in Massachusetts Gerard Martin
Vapor Intrusion in Massachusetts Gerard Martin Chief Compliance, Enforcement and Brownfields Redevelopment Section Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup, MassDEP Proposed MCP Amendments Relative to Vapor Intrusion
More informationVapor Intrusion - Site Characterization and Screening. NEWMOA Workshop on Vapor Intrusion Chelmsford, MA April 12, 2006
Vapor Intrusion - Site Characterization and Screening NEWMOA Workshop on Vapor Intrusion Chelmsford, MA April 12, 2006 David J. Folkes P.E. 1 What is Vapor Intrusion?! Compounds of Concern " Volatile Organics
More information23 February 2017 Reference No L-Rev1-8500
23 February 2017 Reference No. David Williams Contaminated Sites Approved Professional Society (CSAP) 744 W. Hastings Street Vancouver, BC V6C 1A5 UPDATED REVIEW OF LATERAL VAPOUR ATTENUATION FACTORS FOR
More informationBackground. NCP Early or Interim Actions 5/3/2017. Current Ohio EPA Response Action Levels and Time Frames for TCE at Vapor Intrusion Sites in Ohio
Current Ohio EPA Response Action Levels and Time Frames for TCE at Vapor Intrusion Sites in Ohio Carrie Rasik, Risk Assessor Ohio EPA MSECA, May 2017 Background U.S. EPA IRIS 2011 TCE Toxicity Update -
More informationPennsylvania s Land Recycling Program. Vapor Intrusion Technical Guidance
Pennsylvania s Land Recycling Program Vapor Intrusion Technical Guidance Appendix Y: Vapor Intrusion Modeling Guidance The Department recommends the use of EPA s Johnson & Ettinger model (U.S. EPA, 2004)
More informationIPEC Conference San Antonio, TX November 13, 2013 Glenn Nicholas Iosue
Mitigation of Petroleum Vapor Intrusion with Horizontal Remediation Wells IPEC Conference San Antonio, TX November 13, 2013 Glenn Nicholas Iosue Distribution of Source Material at LNAPL Site Fill Utility
More informationOregon Guidance for Assessing and Remediating Vapor Intrusion in Buildings
Department of Environmental Quality Overview of Oregon Guidance for Assessing and Remediating Vapor Intrusion in Buildings Brownfields and Land Revitalization 2011 Conference Spokane, Washington May 13,
More informationA Rational Approach to Vapor Intrusion Preferential Pathways
A Rational Approach to Vapor Intrusion Preferential Pathways PRESENTED BY: David J. Folkes, PE Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS West Coast Conference EPA Vapor Intrusion Technical Workshop March 22, 2016
More informationCorps Base Camp Lejeune: Utilizing the DoD Phased Approach to Prioritize Building Investigations
A Base-Wide Vapor Intrusion Evaluation at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune: Utilizing the DoD Phased Approach to Prioritize Building Investigations Jennifer Simms, Loren Lund, and Keri Hallberg, CH2M HILL,
More informationVapor Intrusion Update: Separating the Environmental exposure from Indoor Air Quality Issues Guidance
Vapor Intrusion Update: Separating the Environmental exposure from Indoor Air Quality Issues Guidance Will Elcoate Alpha Analytical December 5 th. 2014 1 Vapor Intrusion is the migration of volatile chemicals
More informationAttenuation of Hydrocarbon Vapors from LNAPL Under Residential and Commercial/Industrial Buildings
Attenuation of Hydrocarbon Vapors from LNAPL Under Residential and Commercial/Industrial Buildings Presented at: Vapor Intrusion Attenuation Workshop 14 th Annual West Coast Conference on Soils, Sediments
More informationRisk and Required Mitigation
1 2.3 Critical Exposure Pathways 2.3.1 Identification of a Critical Exposure Pathway (CEP) 2.3.1.1. The CEP Concept The CEP requirements in the MCP are focused on human receptors in homes, schools and
More informationCOMMENTS RECEIVED ON PROPOSED GUIDANCE Land Recycling Program Technical Guidance Manual Section IV.A.4 Vapor Intrusion into Buildings from
COMMENTS RECEIVED ON PROPOSED GUIDANCE Land Recycling Program Technical Guidance Manual Section IV.A.4 Vapor Intrusion into Buildings from Groundwater and Soil under the Act 2 Statewide Health Standard
More informationNovember 8, 2016 International Petroleum Environmental Conference. Tim Nickels Pastor, Behling & Wheeler, LLC
November 8, 2016 International Petroleum Environmental Conference Tim Nickels Pastor, Behling & Wheeler, LLC Long term, non-voluntary constant inhalation exposure to toxic compounds Non-voluntarily inhale
More informationEvaluating the Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Pathway
Evaluating the Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Pathway Studies of Natural Attenuation of Subsurface Petroleum Hydrocarbons & Recommended Screening Criteria NEIWPCC Webinar on Petroleum Vapor Intrusion June 26,
More informationTCE Havertown Site Vapor Intrusion Assessment
TCE Havertown Site Vapor Intrusion Assessment Informational Meeting Quatrani Building, Commissioner s Meeting Room Havertown, PA Ruth Scharr, On-Scene Coordinator (EPA) Mindi Snoparsky, Hydrogeologist
More informationVapor Intrusion Pathway Screening for Soil Excavation Remedies
Vapor Intrusion Pathway Screening for Soil Excavation Remedies Helen Dawson, Ph.D. Geosyntec Consultants Chris Lutes, CH2MHill Dan Carr, Sanborn Head & Associates Todd McAlary, Geosyntec Consultants Robert
More informationEPA s Final Vapor Intrusion Guidance
EPA s Final Vapor Intrusion Guidance Introductory Webinar for EPA Staff by Richard Kapuscinski Office of Land & Emergency Management (OLEM) October 2017 1 I. What is Vapor Intrusion and Why Does it Matter?
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Bureau of Environmental Cleanup and Brownfields
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Bureau of Environmental Cleanup and Brownfields DOCUMENT NUMBER: 260-0500-001 TITLE: Policy for Coordinating Immediate Responses and Final Remediation of Releases
More informationDECISION DOCUMENT. Kent Avenue Station Site Voluntary Cleanup Program Brooklyn, Kings County Site No. V00732 October 2013
DECISION DOCUMENT Kent Avenue Station Site Voluntary Cleanup Program Brooklyn, Kings County Site No. V00732 October 2013 Prepared by Division of Environmental Remediation New York State Department of Environmental
More informationArmen Cleaners Indoor Air Quality Investigation. Jon Gulch, OSC U.S. EPA, Region V, ERB
Armen Cleaners Indoor Air Quality Investigation Jon Gulch, OSC U.S. EPA, Region V, ERB Purpose of Investigation Assist MDCH in Evaluating Indoor Air Quality of Residences for the Presence of VOCs Associated
More informationASTM E Standard Update. Key Revisions to E Impacting Phase I Investigations
ASTM E1527-13 Standard Update The ASTM published the new standard for conducting Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, ASTM E1527-13 on November 6th, 2013. ASTM E1527-13 is in effect and replaces the
More informationRISK BULLETIN. Vapor Intrusion An Emerging Environmental Liability WHAT IS VAPOR INTRUSION?
RISK BULLETIN Vapor Intrusion An Emerging Environmental Liability From companies that use volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in their processes to firms that develop land, environmental impacts to soil
More informationTier 1 Vapor Migration Screening for Property Transactions Using ASTM E
Tier 1 Vapor Migration Screening for Property Transactions Using ASTM E2600-15 Presented by Todd Elmore, EDR Business Development Manager Southeast Atlantic Southeastern States Vapor Intrusion Symposium
More informationEPA S 2015 vapor intrusion guides What do they mean for your facility?
Environmental law alert Nixon peabody LLP July 22, 2015 EPA S 2015 vapor intrusion guides What do they mean for your facility? By J. Timothy Ramsey and Jean McCreary The United States Environmental Protection
More informationKARST GEOLOGY, VAPOR INTRUSION, AND HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT. Fundamental Issues to Consider
KARST GEOLOGY, VAPOR INTRUSION, AND HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT Fundamental Issues to Consider Introduction 2 Development of property with karst features Standard geologic investigation methods to determine
More informationIndoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex. Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex. For More Information
Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex September 2017 Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex Lockheed Martin has been investigating and, more recently, cleaning up soil
More informationPart 3 Fundamentals. Most Common VI Bloopers. Handy Unit Conversions:
Part 3 Fundamentals Units Contaminant Partitioning Vapor Migration Bioattenuation Site Conceptual Model Attenuation (alpha) Factors Risk/Screening Levels Most Common VI Bloopers Unit Confusion Assuming
More informationRemedial Program Status Updates GE Plant Sites in Hudson Falls and Fort Edward. Hudson River Community Advisory Group June 27, 2013
Remedial Program Status Updates GE Plant Sites in Hudson Falls and Fort Edward Hudson River Community Advisory Group June 27, 2013 Hudson Falls Plant Site Fort Edward Plant Site Bakers Falls Dam 004 Outfall
More informationNew Insights Into Exposure Through Preferential Pathway Vapor Migration
New Insights Into Exposure Through Preferential Pathway Vapor Migration Megan Hamilton Director of Vapor Intrusion and Risk Assessment Casey McFall, CHMM Vapor Intrusion Project Manager EnviroForensics
More informationRemTech 2011: BC Perspectives. Vapour Intrusion in High Density Development Mark Adamson, P.GEO, CSAP
RemTech 2011: BC Perspectives Vapour Intrusion in High Density Development Mark Adamson, P.GEO, CSAP Who is Mark? Introduction Mark Adamson Geoscientist by training (C.Geol UK, P.Geo) Environmental consultant
More informationI would like to thank the many program stakeholders who have provided valuable input in the development of this document.
December 20, 2011 Dear Interested Party: The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) is pleased to announce the publication of the Interim Final Vapor Intrusion Guidance (WSC#-11-435).
More informationVapor Intrusion Pathway Feasibility Study
Vapor Intrusion Pathway Feasibility Study East Hennepin Avenue Site Minneapolis, Minnesota Prepared for General Mills, Inc. April 2016 4300 MarketPointe Drive, Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55435 Phone: 952.832.2600
More informationConceptual Site Model for Mercury Impacted Soil and Groundwater as a Tool for Effective Remediation
Conceptual Site Model for Mercury Impacted Soil and Groundwater as a Tool for Effective Remediation David J. Russell, P.E., BCEE, LSRP, Christopher Wong, P.G. & Anne Lewis-Russ, PhD AECOM Former New Jersey
More informationi-admin /15/14 2 of 3 Doc Type: Board Memo/Issue Statement
On September 13, 2010, with MPCA approval GMI discontinued the groundwater extraction and treatment because TCE concentrations had decreased below the cleanup concentrations established in the Consent
More informationREGULATORY-DIRECTED COMBINED REMEDY APPROACH FOR CHLORINATED VAPOR INTRUSION/MITIGATION AND GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION UNDER A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD
REGULATORY-DIRECTED COMBINED REMEDY APPROACH FOR CHLORINATED VAPOR INTRUSION/MITIGATION AND GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION UNDER A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD Thomas R. Szocinski, CEP Director of Vapor Intrusion
More informationA REVIEW OF VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE BY STATE
A REVIEW OF VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE BY STATE Laurent C. Levy, Ph.D., P.E., Gradient Senior Project Manager Webinar Tuesday, August 14, 2012 Northeast Waste Management Officials' Association Gradient Gradientcorp.com
More informationVapor Intrusion Basics
Vapor Intrusion Basics Larry Schnapf So your client thinks that it has no more worries with its remediated site? Not so fast. There s a new factor to consider vapor intrusion. THE PAST DECADE witnessed
More informationIssue No. 7 Fall 2017 Is It a REC? Vapor Intrusion Confusion Back in 2008 the American Society for Testing and Materials (now ASTM International) released its guidance for what was then described as an
More informationConceptual Site Model Considerations - Terrestrial/Groundwater
Site Description Site Conditions Location: Size: Site Status: Active Inactive Unknown Describe present site conditions using information obtained during property inspection or sitespecific documents to
More informationVadose Zone Profiling to Better Understand Processes
Vapor Intrusion 2010 Sept. 29-30 Chicago Vadose Zone Profiling to Better Understand Processes Related to Vapor Intrusion Daniel B. Carr, P.E., P.G., Laurent C. Levy, Ph.D., P.E., Allan H. Horneman, D.E.S.
More informationModern Electroplating Site Update. Dudley Vision Advisory Task Force September 2008 Meeting
Modern Electroplating Site Update Dudley Vision Advisory Task Force September 2008 Meeting 1 Modern Electroplating Uncontrolled Waste Site Key elements that define a site relative to MA DEP and US EPA
More informationHIGHLIGHTS OF PROPOSED REVISIONS. Technical Guidance Manual
HIGHLIGHTS OF PROPOSED REVISIONS Pennsylvania=s Land Recycling Program Technical Guidance Manual Listed below are highlights of proposed revisions to PA DEP=s Act 2 Land Recycling Technical Assistance
More informationMarch 2010 Frequently Asked Questions
March 2010 Frequently Asked Questions 1. Can residents in the Vapor Mitigation Area have an option to choose an independent contractor to conduct sampling of their homes before mitigation systems are installed?
More information7.0 EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES
7.0 EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES This section provides a description of the developed remedial alternatives based on viable remedial technologies and process options, as identified in Section 4.0,
More information15A NCAC 02L.0106 CORRECTIVE ACTION (a) Where groundwater quality has been degraded, the goal of any required corrective action shall be restoration
15A NCAC 02L.0106 CORRECTIVE ACTION (a) Where groundwater quality has been degraded, the goal of any required corrective action shall be restoration to the level of the standards, or as closely thereto
More informationUpdate - Vapor Intrusion and Mitigation in Florida
Florida Brownfields Conference Update - Vapor Intrusion and Mitigation in Florida Gordon L. Walters Jr., P.E., M.B.A. October 30, 2012 What is Vapor Intrusion? Vapor Intrusion is the migration of volatile
More informationColorado's Conditional Closure Policy and Guidance: Risk-Based Approach to Ground Water Cleanups
Colorado's Conditional Closure Policy and Guidance: Risk-Based Approach to Ground Water Cleanups Walter Avramenko Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment May 3, 2012 In the beginning Evolution
More informationVolatilization to Indoor Air Pathway (VIAP) and Vapor Intrusion (VI)
Volatilization to Indoor Air Pathway (VIAP) and Vapor Intrusion (VI) What it is and What s up Matthew Williams Vapor Intrusion Specialist Remediation and Redevelopment Division Phone: (517)284-5171 Email:
More informationH&P Breakfast Seminar
Vapor Intrusion Risk Pathway: Regulatory Updates H&P Breakfast Seminar September 25, 2012 Blayne Hartman 858-204-6170 blayne@hartmaneg.com EPA Guidance Updates (Final Out in Nov 2012) EPA (OSWER & Superfund)
More informationMISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES. Monitored Natural Attenuation of Groundwater Contamination at Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites
MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Monitored Natural Attenuation of Groundwater Contamination at Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites Technical Bulletin 1/2002 Hazardous Waste Program The chemical, physical
More informationRisk-Based Clean-Up in Georgia Under the VRP Vapor Intrusion
Risk-Based Clean-Up in Georgia Under the VRP Vapor Intrusion Presented by: Genesis Project, Inc. in conjunction with Atlas Geo-Sampling Presentation Topics 1. Regulatory Implications 2. Vapor Intrusion
More informationMulti-Component Remediation of Petroleum and Metals at a Former Power Plant in San Francisco, California
Multi-Component Remediation of Petroleum and Metals at a Former Power Plant in San Francisco, California October 2 nd, 2014 Insert then choose Picture select your picture. Right click your picture and
More informationVAPOR ENCROACHMENT VAPOR INTRUSION; TRANSACTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THE POSSIBLE VAPOR INTRUSION PATHWAY
VAPOR ENCROACHMENT VAPOR INTRUSION; TRANSACTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THE POSSIBLE VAPOR INTRUSION PATHWAY By Russell Griebel, P.G., C.P.G. United Consulting Presentation Talking Points How We Got Here Vapor
More informationLand Recycling Program Technical Guidance Manual Sections I, II, III & V Proposed Revisions
Land Recycling Program Technical Guidance Manual Sections I, II, III & V Proposed Revisions Cleanup Standards Scientific Advisory Board Meeting June 28, 2017 presented by: Michael Maddigan PADEP Tom Wolf,
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Bureau of Land Recycling and Waste Management. Land Recycling Program Technical Guidance Manual
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Bureau of Land Recycling and Waste Management DOCUMENT NUMBER: TITLE: 253-0300-100 (partial) Land Recycling Program Technical Guidance Manual EFFECTIVE DATE: June
More informationMassDEP Response. Comment Number. Comment Set(s)
Response to Public s on the December 2010 Vapor Intrusion pg. 1 Summary of (s) 1 Introduction 1 contains many very specific recommendations, all of which the Department describes as presumptively appropriate.
More informationHave You Caught a Case of the Vapors?
Have You Caught a Case of the Vapors? By: Staige Miller, EP, Director of Environmental Services March 2012 Why is Vapor Intrusion an Environmental Risk? There is a new buzz word that is making its way
More informationCalifornia Low-Threat Closure Policy
California Low-Threat Closure Policy Catalina Espino Devine Lead Engineer Chevron Energy Technology Company CSAP Fall Professional Development Workshop Vancouver, BC November 23, 2016 Outline Overview
More informationIndoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex
Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex September 2016 Lockheed Martin has been investigating, and more recently, cleaning up contaminants in soil and groundwater at the Middle River Complex.
More informationDRAFT Alberta Risk Management Plan Guide
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 DRAFT FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY DO NOT QUOTE, CITE, POST, PUBLISH, LINK, or HYPERLINK DRAFT Alberta Risk Management Plan
More informationU.S. EPA s Vapor Intrusion Database: Preliminary Evaluation of Attenuation Factors
March 4, 2008 U.S. EPA s Vapor Intrusion Database: Preliminary Evaluation of Attenuation Factors Office of Solid Waste U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 [This page intentionally
More informationSite Investigation of Ground Water
Site Investigation of Ground Water Christina Page New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Inspection and Review 1 Ground Water Site Investigation Overview Applicable Ground Water Remediation
More informationNon-Aqueous Phase Liquids Young Environmental Professionals (YEPs) Presentation 23 February 2017
Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids Young Environmental Professionals (YEPs) Presentation 23 February 2017 Gordon Binkhorst Senior Hydrogeologist at ALTA Environmental Corp. 1998 - Present Brown University, B.S.
More information4. LNAPL Conceptual Site Model (LCSM)
4. LNAPL Conceptual Site Model (LCSM) Figure 4-1. LNAPL conceptual site model (LCSM) stages and integration with LNAPL alternative evaluation. The LCSM is the collection of information that incorporates
More informationMEMO. Kris Hinskey
To: Paul Owens, District Supervisor MDEQ SE Michigan District Office 27700 Donald Court Warren, Michigan 48092-2793 owensp@michigan.gov Copies: Brandon Alger MDEQ Gerald Tiernan - MDEQ Todd Walton Ford
More informationMass Flux Characterization for Vapor Intrusion Assessment
Mass Flux Characterization for Vapor Intrusion Assessment ESTCP ER 201503 Helen Dawson, Ph.D. Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. April 13, 2016 Project Team Organization Individual Responsibility/Specialization
More informationRECORD OF SITE CLOSURE (REMEDIAL ACTION OR CORRECTIVE ACTION) State Form (10-10) INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
RECORD OF SITE CLOSURE (REMEDIAL ACTION OR CORRECTIVE ACTION) State Form 54472 (10-10) INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 1. SITE INFORMATION INSTRUCTIONS: 1. The purpose of this form is to
More informationSTATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL- SITE INVESTIGATION AND RESTORATION BRANCH
STATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL- SITE INVESTIGATION AND RESTORATION BRANCH PROPOSED PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION May 2006 Ion Power Formally South Parcel of Metachem
More informationPROPOSED DECISION DOCUMENT. CE - E. 19th St. Station Voluntary Cleanup Program New York, New York County Site No. V00542 October 2017
PROPOSED DECISION DOCUMENT CE - E. 19th St. Station Voluntary Cleanup Program New York, New York County Site No. V00542 October 2017 Prepared by Division of Environmental Remediation New York State Department
More informationD2 Project Environmental Remediation Briefing August 21, 2018
D2 Project Environmental Remediation Briefing August 21, 2018 The Union Square Revitalization Project (USQ) is a 2.4 million square foot transit-oriented, mixed use project that is transforming Union Square,
More informationPresented by: Thomas Hatton
Presented by: Thomas Hatton 1 What is Vapor Intrusion? Methods of Correction Building Investigation Designing Effective Systems VI Mitigation in Existing Buildings VI Mitigation in Construction of New
More informationIntegrated DNAPL Site Strategy (IDSS)
Integrated DNAPL Site Strategy (IDSS) Sydney, Australia September 2014 Melbourne, Australia October 2014 Naji Akladiss, P.E., Maine DEP Charles (Chuck) Newell, Ph.D., P.E., GSI Environmental Inc. Tamzen
More informationIn Situ Thermal NAPL Remediation at the Northeast Site Pinellas Environmental Restoration Project
ABSTRACT In Situ Thermal NAPL Remediation at the Northeast Site Pinellas Environmental Restoration Project R. Juhlin, M. Butherus S.M. Stoller Corporation 2597 B ¾ Road, Grand Junction, C0 81506 USA The
More informationVAP Introduction to the Voluntary Action Program. Division of Emergency and Remedial Response
VAP 101 - Introduction to the Voluntary Action Program Division of Emergency and Remedial Response Ohio EPA Voluntary Action Program Created in 1994 Ohio Revised Code (ORC) 3746 Final Rules went into effect
More informationRemoval of Perchloroethylene within a Silt Confining Layer Using Hydrogen Release Compound
Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Soils, Sediments, Water and Energy Volume 15 Article 20 June 2010 Removal of Perchloroethylene within a Silt Confining Layer Using Hydrogen Release
More informationJ A N U A R Y 1 5, Vapor Intrusion in Utility Corridors: What We Know and What We Don t Know
J A N U A R Y 1 5, 2 0 1 5 Vapor Intrusion in Utility Corridors: What We Know and What We Don t Know P R E S E N TAT I O N O V E R V I E W Background on Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) and
More informationRisk-Based Cleanup Actions for Closure of a Brownfield Site
Risk-Based Cleanup Actions for Closure of a Brownfield Site H.W. Rice, J.F. Feild, L.C. Farr Jr. AMEC Earth and Environmental, Inc. 7376 SW Durham Road, Portland, Oregon 97224 USA ABSTRACT Operating as
More informationRisk-Based Decision Making for Site Cleanup
Risk-Based Decision Making for Site Cleanup The Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has adopted a risk-based decision-making process to provide a framework for determining cleanup requirements
More informationEKOS Oct 2010 COMBINING SOIL GAS SAMPLING AND MIP INVESTIGATION TO OPTIMIZE A DNAPL SOURCE ZONE CHARACTERIZATION
COMBINING SOIL GAS SAMPLING AND MIP INVESTIGATION TO OPTIMIZE A DNAPL SOURCE ZONE CHARACTERIZATION Paulo Valle Principal Consultant ERM Benelux EKOS Oct 2010 Area Layout & Project Goals Groundwater Flow
More informationReceive Site Fact Sheets by . See "For More Information" to Learn How.
February 2016 FACT SHEET State Superfund Program Receive Site Fact Sheets by Email. See "For More Information" to Learn How. Site Name: Solvent Finishers DEC Site #: 130172 Address: 601 Cantiague Rock
More information23 rd National Tanks Conference Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Session March 19, 2012 Matthew D. Young Cumberland Farms Inc.
23 rd National Tanks Conference Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Session March 19, 2012 Matthew D. Young Cumberland Farms Inc. Gulf Oil LP Table of Contents Purpose & Scope (2 minutes) The Tale of the Tape (3
More informationEvaluation of Spatial and Temporal Variability in VOC Concentrations at Vapor Intrusion Investigation Sites.
Evaluation of Spatial and Temporal Variability in VOC Concentrations at Vapor Intrusion Investigation Sites. Proceeding of Air & Waste Management Association s Vapor Intrusion: Learning from the Challenges,
More informationEstablishing Contact
ENHANCED IN-SITU BIOREMEDIATION Implementation Design & System Operation CONTACT!!! Impacts of Geology / Contaminant Distribution Delivery system Design / Selection Mike Marley : ~ 1:45 to 3:00pm Establishing
More informationFACTS ABOUT: Vapor Intrusion
Maryland Department of the Environment FACTS ABOUT: Vapor Intrusion The Land Restoration Program (LRP) is charged with assessing and cleaning up uncontrolled hazardous waste sites throughout Maryland to
More informationScreening Distances for Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Risk Assessment
Screening Distances for Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Risk Assessment 23nd Annual International Conference on Soil, Water, Energy, and Air and AEHS Foundation Annual Meeting San Diego, California March 18-21,
More informationDODVAPOR INTRUSION HANDBOOK
DODVAPOR INTRUSION HANDBOOK JANUARY 2009 PREPARED BY THE TRI-SERVICE ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT WORKGROUP ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Noblis prepared this document for the Air Force Institute for Operational Health
More informationQuantitative Decision Framework for Vapor Intrusion Evaluation in DoD Industrial Buildings - Based on an Empirical Database
Quantitative Decision Framework for Vapor Intrusion Evaluation in DoD Industrial Buildings - Based on an Empirical Database Christopher Lutes, Loren Lund, Keri Hallberg (CH2M HILL) Patricia Venable (NAVFAC
More informationPVI Risk Pathway: Sampling Considerations
PVI Risk Pathway: Sampling Considerations AEHS PVI Workshop March 2015 Blayne Hartman Ph.D. 858-204-6170 www.hartmaneg.com PVI VI Pathway Made Simple Start Exclusion Criteria Exist? yes no Collect Clean
More informationSuccessful Closure of a DNAPL Site. Craig A. Cox, CPG, CP
Successful Closure of a DNAPL Site Craig A. Cox, CPG, CP Topics for Discussion What is DNAPL and why are DNAPL sites so difficult to close. What is DNAPL site closure. What is the approach to successful
More informationNew Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Site Remediation Program RECEPTOR EVALUATION FORM INSTRUCTIONS
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Site Remediation Program RECEPTOR EVALUATION FORM INSTRUCTIONS General instructions 1. Applicability. The purpose of this Receptor Evaluation Form is to
More informationDepartment of Toxic Substances Control
Matthew Rodriquez Secretary for Environmental Protection Department of Toxic Substances Control Deborah O. Raphael, Director 8800 Cal Center Drive Sacramento, California 95826-3200 Edmund G. Brown Jr.
More information