Energy research policy in Europe Example of Fuel Cell and Hydrogen. Paul Lucchese N.ERGHY Chair Member of JTI FCH Governing board

Transcription

1 Energy research policy in Europe Example of Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Paul Lucchese N.ERGHY Chair Member of JTI FCH Governing board

2 Outline Overview european energy policy JTI FCH: after three call 2008; 2009;2010 Post JTI Era: needs for

3 ENERGY 2020 A strategy for competitive, sustainable and secure energy

4 RISING CHALLENGES Decarbonization of the energy system: commitment to cut greenhouse gas emissions to combat climate change end reach sustainability. Ensure security of supply: reduce dependence on imports through savings, new alternatives and development of indigenous fuels. Competitiveness: citizens and businesses are entitled to have access to affordable energy. 1 trillion investments needed to replace obsolete capacity, modernise infrastructure and diversify energy resources

5 The famous « » in 2020

6 ENERGY STRATEGY 2020 : 5 PRIORITIES 1. Efficient use of energy 2. Integrated energy market 3. Secure, safe and affordable energy 4. Technological leadership 5. Strong international partnership

7 PRIORITY 4 Technological leadership Europe must keep its top position in developing new technologies China, Japan, South Korea, the US have ambitious industrial strategies in solar, wind, storage / batteries and nuclear markets, hydrogen We need to pool all financing sources and use the EU budget to leverage additional funding

8 WE HAVE TO INVEST 50 BILLION IN TECHNOLOGY IN THE NEXT 10 YEARS In 1980 we were investing 4 times more than today 7000 Millions of as in 1980 as in 1985 as in 1990 as in 1995 as in 2000 in 2005

9 PRIORITY 4 Technological leadership Implementation of the SET-Plan without delay «Available EU funding will be concentrated on SET-Plan initiatives» «The roadmaps will be the cornerstone for the preparation of the next financial framework» Other sectors: marine energy and heating & cooling Launch 4 large-scale European projects Smart grids Electricity storage Sustainable biofuel Smart cities Hydrogen and fuel cells not discussed yet Ensuring long-term EU technological competitiveness

10 What is the Situation For Fuel Cell and hydrogen in Europe?

11 FCH JU: a european private/public partnership of 940 M (2020) Deployment acceleration Focussing R&DD Research community and industry linking P. E Franc (AL) 20 people/ Autonomy projects 191 M * New European Research Grouping on Fuel Cells and Hydrogen

12

13

14

15

16 Position of Research in FCH JU Governance Priorities Figures and share of budget/nature of topics Preparation of future

17 Research in the governance - FCH JTI is the only Energy JTI today (one of the 5 Existing JTI) -Research community is present through: -Research grouping member of the board NERGHY -Scientific committee -Nerghy is fully representative of European Research community and involved in non-jti activity

18 N.ERGHY: a success story! Represent European R&D community Payed by members fee Has to pay 1/12 running cots of PO One seat at GB Center for Process Innovation 225 M /year 2000 persons Fundacion ITMA Fundacion Cidaut IMDEA Energia Univ. Bordeaux 1 INASMET CIDETEC CIEMAT INTA SINTEF UKERC ECN GKSS ZBT Duisburg FZJ DLR CUTEC INERIS, IFPCNRS IM Mainz CEA Univ. Eifer Univ. Paris XII M.I.N.E.S Nancy PSI Univ. Poitiers Univ. Montpellier 2 CENER Hidrogeno Aragon Univ. Turin XaRMAE Politecnic Univ. Turin AIJU Univ. Alicante Univ. Genoa CESI Ricerca ENEA CNR Univ. Romela Sapienza NTNU RISØE Joanneum NIR Rez Univ. Salerno TKK CPERI VTT ICIT CRES 68 members 17 universities, 3 associations/foundations 1 international organization 45 institutes, centers, national Lab from 21 countries, Last Countries Poland,Csek Republique,Ireland Lithuania, Portugal, Bulgaria UNIDO-ICHET Tübitak N.ERGHY Members May 2009

19 Grouping research centres & universities

20 Some results from research SAFETY 100kW PRODUCTION MO oxidized 800 C MO MO reduced oxidized Η Η Η Η C STORAGE 350 Bar 700 bars SOFC Technology Transfer 5kW, 7000h Natural gaz 50kW 0,3g/kW PEMFC 80kW 1W

21 2 nd N.ERGHY Board - elected in April 2010 President P. Lucchese Secretariat J. Nellen Vice-President & Treasurer C. Sattler Councillor for Transport Applications Councillor for Hydrogen Production Councillor for Stationary Applications Councillor for Early Markets & Training S. Møller-Holst L. Correas A. Moreno R-U. Dietrich

22 Preparation of the future : CSF 2020, EERA Infra NERGHY main priorities Improving Funding rate: rather low (less than 50 % of direct cost for R&D compared to 75%) due mainly to matching rules Strong pression on EC to change EC regulations through member states and european parliament Normally EC regulation modification adopted definitively october 2011 Improvement of Funding rate from 45 % to 58-60% Strong commitment in AIP-MAIP activities: definition of topics and priorities Simplification of procedures etc Good cooperation with industry, decision by consensus Definition of a 4 % fee on projects Brokerage event, general assembly, EP Carrying Basic research and breakthrough research message Non JTI activities: working groups, infrastructure, EERA Education training

23 Example of Two working groups Non JTI- activities

24 Statistics for call projects proposed, 71 accepted, 90 passed threshold 1197 partners- 191 m grant AA Total expenses Accepted Reserve not accepted refused AA AA AA AA cross cutting total total A+R Total general Grant AA Accepté reserve refuse AA AA AA AA cross cutting total total A+R Total general

25 Statistics for call projects proposed, 71 accepted, 90 passed threshold 1197 partners- 191 m grant Year TOTAL GRANT % RESEARCH RESEARCH PROJECT LEADER % Research project leader Grant received by research ,42% 10 62,50% 11545, ,84% 18 64,29% 21642, ,90% 10 37,04% 20118,87 TOTAL ,82% 38 53,52% 53306,86 Public research only

26 Statistics for call 2008 project acronym year leader nature leader total grant % Research description Nexthylights 2008 lbst C AA1 H2 MOVES SCANDINAVIA 2008 lbst C AA1 AUTOSTACK 2008 ZSW R AA1 HYDROSOL3D 2008 cres R AA2 NEXPEL 2008 SINTEF R AA2 PRIMOLYSER 2008 IRDFC I AA2 ROBANODE 2008 CRES R AA3 MCFC CONTEX 2008 ENEA R AA3 GENIUS 2008 EIFER R AA3 ASSENT 2008 VTT R AA3 KEEPMEALIVE 2008 ECN R AA3 DEMMEA 2008 AD ERNEGRY I AA3 LOLIPEM 2008 CNR R AA3 ISH2SUP 2008 TEC UNI FIN R AA4 IRAFC 2008 ADV ENERGY I AA4 PREPEN H ICC I CCI Public research only

27 Public research only Statistics for call 2009 CHIC 2009 EVOBUS I AA1 HYQ 2009 CEA R AA1 PEMICAN 2009 CEA R AA1 HYCOMP 2009 AIR LIQUIDE I AA1 SSH2S 2009 UNI TORINO R AA2 ADEL 2009 HT CERAMIX R AA2 STAYERS 2009 NEDSTACK I AA3 DESIGN 2009 CEA R AA3 DCODE 2009 UNI SALERNE R AA3 NH34PM 2009 DIV NERGY I AA3 LOTUS 2009 HYGEAR R AA3 SOFCLIFE 2009 FZJ R AA3 FCEUROGRID 2009 FZJ R AA3 ASTERIX DANTHERM I AA3 PREMIUM ACT 2009 CEA R AA3 RAMSES 2009 CEA R AA3 MAESTRO 2009 CNRS R AA3 CATION 2009 VTT R AA3 SCOTAS SOFC 2009 DTU R AA3 MOBYPOST 2009 IPV C AA4 SHEL 2009 CIDETEC R AA4 FITUP 2009 EL SYSTEM I AA4 HYLIFTER 2009 LBST C AA4 HYPROFESSIONAL 2009 FUND ARAGON R CCI H2FC LCA 2009 ENEA R CCI HYGUIDE 2009 PE GBMH I CCI TRAINHY PRO 2009 FZJ R CCI HYFACTS 2009 TUV C CCI

28 Public research only Statistics for call 2010 DESTA 2010AV L I AA1 HIGH V LO CITY 2010VAN HOOL I AA1 FCGEN 2010 VOLVO I AA1 HYTEC 2010AIR PRODUCTS I AA1 NEMESIS DLR R AA2 IDEALHY 2010 SHELL I AA2 ELYGRID 2010F ARAGON R AA2 COMETHY 2010 ENEA R AA2 HY2SEPS CRES R AA2 RESELYSER 2010 DLR R AA2 HYTIME 2010 I I AA2 DEMCOPEM 2010 NEDSTACK I AA3 TOWERPOWER 2010DIVERSE ENERGY I AA3 C3SOFC 2010ROLLS ROYCE I AA3 LASERCELL 2010AFC NR I AA3 MMLRC=SOFC 2010 FZJ R AA3 METPROCELL 2010 INASMET R AA3 SOFCPACT 2010 EON I AA3 MATSAPP 2010 TOPSOE I AA3 REFORCELL 2010 INASMET R AA3 SOFCOM 2010POLITEC TORINO R AA3 SUAV 2010 HYGEAR I AA4 FCPOWERED RBS 2010ERICSON I AA4 DURAMET 2010 CNR R AA4 HYINDOOR 2010 AIR LIQUIDE I AA4 FCLIFT 2010 AIR LIQUIDE I AA4 TEMONAS 2010 CIM I CCI

29 TRANSPORTATION & REFUELLING INFRASTRUCTURE HYDROGEN PRODUCTION & DISTRIBUTION STATIONARY POWER GENERATION & CHP EARLY MARKETS Types of project supported (44 projects from call ) Demonstration of hydrogen fuelled road vehicles and refuelling infrastructure (2) Preparation for large scale vehicles demonstration in Europe (1) Hydrogen fuel quality for transportation and other energy applications (2)- storage (1) Fuel cell cluster (1) Efficient PEM (2) and solid oxid (1) electrolysers Water decomposition with solar heat sources (1) Hydrogen storage tank-solid state (1) Operation diagnostic and control (4) Component and system improvements (2) Degradation of life time fundamentals (9) and materials development (3) Demonstration (1) Evaluation of performance of FC in EU energy supply grids (1) proof of concept (2) Fuel supply technology for portable and micro fuel cells (2) Demonstration of hydrogen powered FC powered handling materials (3)- back up power (1) CROSS- CUTTING ISSUES (planning of socio-economic activities- (6) 29

30 Mid Term Review of the Joint Undertaking In particular, the current portfolio is clearly light on hydrogen production, storage and distribution; needing breakthroughs, so efforts should be made to increase activity. Priorities and work on RCS should be led by industry. Efforts should be made to develop evidence of needs (or lack of needs) feeding from IG to the AIP and work programme. The JU programme is not structured for, and does not encourage, basic research seeking radical innovation. The EC must ensure appropriate support is provided for such work through other suitable instruments. To achieve its objectives, the FCH JU needs to maintain its focus on innovation and respond to emergent competing technologies. 30

31 Review day and Stakeholders General Assembly, November 2011 Events: Participation to EU Sustainable energy week April Exhibitions, Drive n Ride by Industry Media Relations Inauguration of White atrium building Launch of call 2011 and information about information session and brokerage event European Commission exhibition place H2 bus in front of Berlaymont 31

32 How to prepare the future of Hydrogen and fuel cell in EC?

33 Future of N.ERGHY and FCH-JU 7 th N.ERGHY General Assembly Berlin, May 18 th 2011 Luis Correas lcorreas@hidrogenoaragon.org

34

35 Positioning EERA along the Chain of Innovation EERA SCIENCE MARKET Teams of Excellence Exploring new routes Joint Programming by Alliance between Public Research Institutes Demonstration under Industry Lead

36 EERA governance SET Plan Steering Group Advisory committee Member States EU Executive Committee secretariat R&T programme level European Technological platform Fundamental Research (ERC, MS) SET-Plan Industrial Initiatives JTIs HFC + ITER

37

38 State of the art Existing Joint programming Photovoltaic 90 people Wind Energy 130 people Geothermal Energy 250 people Smart grids 60 people Materials for nuclear 133 people CCS 270 people Bioénergies 100 people In progress: Concentrated solar power (CSP) Basic Science for energy AMPEA Fuel cells and electrolysers Marine energy Smart cities Energy storage

39 Fuel Cells & Electrolysers Le coordinateur du programme conjoint est: Angelo Moreno (ENEA) Participants: CEA, DLR, ECN, ENEA, FZJ, JRC, Supergen FC, Risoe, Sintef, VTT La première réunion a eu lieu les 17 et 18 juin (Bruxelles) (11participants) Thématiques potentielles identifiées: Research Area Electrolytes Stack materials Systems Catalysts and Electrodes Modelling and Characterisation Coordinator Tbd Tbd Tbd tbd Tbd Travail en collaboration étroitewww.eera-set.eu avec la JTI FCH et avec le PC EERA

40 AMPEA Physical processes Turbulence, heat transfer Multiscale modelling and fabrication of Materials Materials (nano to macro) Physico-chemical processes And devices

41 AMPEA Research Area SPC Fonctionnalisation & Structuration (including nano-structuration) of materials and surfaces - including multi-scale simulation Characterisation and demonstration platforms for energy devices Physical chemistry of Energy Devices (including nano-chemical engineering) and functionnalisation of molecules, including quantum chemical simulation Task force: Basic Science for Energy Task force (not a sub-program but a working group) will consider: heat management and transfer, turbulence Juelich Risoe DTU CEA CEA

42 Participation to key documents Contribution to policy/regulatory initiatives & coalition building Joint Position paper on «Hydrogen and fuel cell technology contributions to a smart, low carbon and secure EU energy system, 31 January 2011 Contribution to Public Hearing on «Fuel and Energy» for the Strategic Transport Technology Plan (STTP), 15 February Contribution to public consultation on «Energy Roadmap 2050», 7 March Joint Letter to Commissioner Oettinger with other Set-Plan initiatives, 15 March Joint Contribution on the White Paper for transport, 15 April Contribution to Green Paper consultation on «Common Framework for Innovation, 20 May key to the future of the Joint Undertaking and FP 8 Contribution to public consultation on STTP

43 17/11/ 2010, EC Communication: Energy infrastructure priorities for 2020 and beyond A Blueprint for an integrated Euro. Energy network. he communication defines EU priority corridors for the transport of electricity, gas and oil. A toolbox is also proposed in order to enable a timely implementation of these priority infrastructures. Hydrogen s role in the future European Energy Infrastructure is more apparent as expressed in the excerpts seen below: Electricity grids must be upgraded and modernised to meet increasing demand due to a major shift in the overall energy value chain and mix but also because of the multiplication of applications and technologies relying on electricity as an energy source (heat pumps, electric vehicles, hydrogen and fuel cells information and communication devices etc.). page 6: section 2.1 Electricity grids and storage need to integrate ongoing research and development work, notably under the SET plan European Electricity Grid Initiative (EEGI) and European Industrial Wind Initiative, to adapt existing and to develop new transmission, storage and smart grid technologies. In this context, it will also need to integrate the potential for large-scale hydrogen transport and storage. When coupled with fuel cells, it is particularly suited for distributed and transport applications. Commercialisation for residential applications could be expected as of 2015 and for hydrogen vehicles around 2020.

44 4/2/2011 European Council decisions EU Energy Council calls on EC to table initiatives on Smart Grids including clean vehicles and energy storage The Energy Council that was held on February 4, 2011 organized by the Hungarian presidency focused on two sectors energy and innovation. It agreed on a number of priority actions whose implementation should contribute to enhancing growth and job creation as well as promoting Europe s competitiveness: 1. work towards the early adoption of the Commission s proposal for a Regulation on energy markets integrity and transparency; 2. the Council confirmed that major efforts are needed to modernise and expand Europe s energy infrastructure and to interconnect networks across borders, in line with the priorities identified by the Commission communication on energy infrastructure: it stated that no EU Member State should remain isolated from the European gas and electricity networks after 2015; 3. The bulk of the important financing costs for infrastructure investments will have to be delivered by the market, with costs recovered through tariffs. The Commission is invited to report by June 2011 to the Council on figures on the investments likely to be needed, on suggestions on how to respond to financing requirements and on how to address possible obstacles to infrastructure investment; 4. As of 1 January 2012, all Member States should include energy efficiency standards taking account of the EU headline target in public procurement for relevant public buildings and services; 5. The Commission is invited to table new initiatives on smart grids, including those linked to the development of clean vehicles, energy storage, sustainable bio fuels and energy saving solutions for cities.

45 FP8 Greenbook consultation Working together to deliver on Europe 2020: 1. How should the Common Strategic Framework make EU research and innovation funding more attractive and easy to access for participants? What is needed in addition to a single entry point with common IT tools, a one stop shop for support, a streamlined set of funding instruments covering the full innovation chain and further steps towards administrative simplification? 2. How should EU funding best cover the full innovation cycle from research to market uptake? 3. What are the characteristics of EU funding that maximise the benefit of acting at the EU level? Should there be a strong emphasis on leveraging other sources of funding? 4. How should EU research and innovation funding best be used to pool Member States resources? How should Joint Programming Initiatives between groups of Member States be supported?

46 FP8 Greenbook consultation Working together to deliver on Europe 2020: 5. What should be the balance between smaller, targeted projects and larger, strategic ones? 6. How could the Commission ensure the balance between a unique set of rules allowing for radical simplification and the necessity to keep a certain degree of flexibility and diversity to achieve objectives of different instruments, and respond to the needs of different beneficiaries, in particular SMEs? 7. What should be the measures of success for EU research and innovation funding? Which performance indicators could be used? 8. How should EU research and innovation funding relate to regional and national funding? How should this funding complement funds from the future Cohesion policy, designed to help the less developed regions of the EU, and the rural development programmes?

47 FP8 Greenbook consultation Tackling societal challenges: 9. How should a stronger focus on societal challenges affect the balance between curiosity-driven research and agenda-driven activities? 10. Should there be more room for bottom-up activities? 11. How should EU research and innovation funding best support policy making and forward-looking activities? 12. How should the role of the Commission's Joint Research Centre be improved in supporting policy making and addressing societal challenges? 13. How could EU research and innovation activities attract greater interest and involvement of citizens and civil society?

48 FP8 Greenbook consultation Strengthening competitiveness: 14. How should EU funding best take account of the broad nature of innovation, including non technological innovation, eco-innovation and social innovation? 15. How should industrial participation in EU research and innovation programmes be strengthened? How should Joint Technology Initiatives (such as those launched in the current Framework Programme) or different forms of 'public-private partnerships' be supported? What should be the role of European Technology Platforms? 16. How and what types of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SME) should be supported at EU level; how should this complement national and regional level schemes? What kind of measures should be taken to decisively facilitate the participation of SMEs in EU research and innovation programmes?

49 FP8 Greenbook consultation Strengthening competitiveness: 17. How should open, light and fast implementation schemes (e.g. building on the current FET actions and CIP eco-innovation market replication projects) be designed to allow flexible exploration and commercialisation of novel ideas, in particular by SMEs? 18. How should EU level financial instruments (equity and debt based) be used more extensively? 19. Should new approaches to supporting research and innovation be introduced, in particular through public procurement, including through rules on pre-commercial procurement, and/or inducement prizes? 20. How should intellectual property rules governing EU funding strike the right balance between competitiveness aspects and the need for access to and dissemination of scientific results?

50 FP8 Greenbook consultation Strengthening Europe's science base and the European Research Area: 21. How should the role of the European Research Council be strengthened in supporting world class excellence? 22. How should EU support assist Member States in building up excellence? 23. How should the role of Marie Curie Actions be strengthened in promoting researcher mobility and developing attractive careers? 24. What actions should be taken at EU level to further strengthen the role of women in science and innovation? 25. How should research infrastructures (including EU-wide e-infrastructures) be supported at EU level?

51 FP8 Greenbook consultation Strengthening Europe's science base and the European Research Area: 26. How should international cooperation with non-eu countries be supported e.g. in terms of priority areas of strategic interest, instruments, reciprocity (including on IPR aspects) or cooperation with Member States? 27. Which key issues and obstacles concerning the ERA should EU funding instruments seek to overcome, and which should be addressed by other (e.g. legislative) measures?

52 Evaluation of needs for JTI FCH Industry wants to continue JTI partnership NERGHY approved Estimation of a 17 B needs, 3 B R&D Industry recognized the need of a basic research programme outside future JTI To be built in the next months by NERGHY Link with EERA (FC and Ampea) Coherence to be given at global level

53 Merci de votre attention

54 PRIORITY 1 20% Energy Efficiency Focus on buildings and transport the sectors with largest potential for energy efficiency Public authorities need to lead by example - public procurement should include energy efficiency criteria Industry extensive ecodesign and energy labelling; energymanagement schemes Energy supply uptake of cogeneration and district heating and cooling, introduction of smart meters National Energy Efficiency Action Plans Include measurable objectives and monitor

55 PRIORITY 2 Building a pan-european integrated energy market Implementation of the internal market legislation consolidate the regulatory framework, promote competition and transparency European infrastructure for backbone for electricity and gas to flow freely, development of smart grids Streamlining permit procedures and market rules for infrastructure developments Providing the right financial framework - innovative funding mechanisms for projects of European interest

56 PRIORITY 3 Secure, safe and affordable energy Making energy policy more consumer-friendly - empowering consumers so that they better participate and benefit from the energy market Continuous improvement in safety and security - enhance safety and security frameworks (offshore oil and gas, nuclear and new energy technologies)

57 PRIORITY 5 International Partnership Integrating energy markets and regulatory frameworks with our neighbours - Energy Community Treaty and Charter Establishing privileged partnerships with key supplier and transit countries diversification of import resources Promoting the EU global role for a low-carbon energy future - bilateral cooperation activities and cooperation with Africa Promoting legally-binding nuclear safety, security and non-proliferation standards worldwide

58 WAY FORWARD A set of priority initiatives for the next 18 months Infrastructure: new strategy, financial instrument, proposal on permitting and planning Smart grids: R&D, framework for implementation Energy Efficiency: new Action Plan, new regulation on energy efficiency, financial instrument International relations for energy: new strategy, new mechanisms