Indoor pass by noise France

Transcription

1 Transmitted by the expert of FRANCE Informal document GRB (67th GRB, January 2018, agenda items 4 (a) and 17) Indoor pass by noise France Presented by Louis-Ferdinand PARDO GRB 67th session 1

2 Indoor in standardization First indoor regulation UN ECE138 for QRTV Indoor pass-by noise : ISO and proposed in UN ECE51 Simulated Pass-By 2

3 Indoor processing 3

4 Laboratory vs Real Driving Political questions Indoor test WLPC Outdoor test RDE Pollution Indoor and outdoor cycles are different Indoor or outdoor test R51.03 Annex 3 Noise Same cycle for Indoor and outdoor Indoor or outdoor test R51.03 ASEP 4

5 Political questions For indoor application, the manufacturer shall provide to the technical service documentation. Validation of facility e.g. free field propagation, dyno and air handling noise background noise level, dyno dynamic performance, software. Procedures to be applied for indoor testing, e.g. dyno and software setup, loading and tie-down, air-handling and vehicle s temperature management, Coast down and tyre input sound level data used for calculation of dynamometer load coefficients and tire sound data used for determination of final reported results, e.g. testing, datas management Testing results on a representative selection of the manufacturer s production to demonstrate that indoor testing delivers comparable results as outdoor testing within acceptable accuracy. 5

6 Correlations from states of art Peak pass-by noise level measured in a semi-anechoic chamber [db (A)] 10 db Peak vehicle noise level measured in a proving ground test [db (A)] Development of Pass-by noise Measurement System on a Chassis Dynamometer, Daisuke Morie, Yoshihiro Shirahashi and Al; SAE 2008 Kramer and ald, Comparison of pass-by noise from real track and simulated mesurement at the roller test bench, internoise,

7 Validation tests Test programs were performing by UTAC CERAM in its indoor and outdoor facilities The objective is : to valide applicability of the method and to estimate potential of correlation indoor/outdoor. 7

8 Instrumentation 1. Measuring instruments All measuring instuments have same or better precision than outdoor. Indoor uses «virtual sound level meter» with different processing techniques which is able to provide comparable results to a single type 1 sound level meters (sound level meter compliance method for virtual sound level is an application of IEC and 3 type 1). 8

9 Room acoustic performance Test Site Indoor ISO requires ISO for free-field validation. UN R138 refers also to ISO requirement. Indoor acoustic s propagation is comparable to outdoor acoustic s propagation. All measurement facilities, either indoor or outdoor have similar deviations. 9

10 Vehicle dynamic Test Site Indoor Using coast-down data from emission/pollution, indoor is able to provide comparable dynamic between indoor and outdoor. Deviation indoor % outdoor gear 2 gear 3 gear 4 Mean 0,4% 0,5% 1,1% Max 0,7% 1,2% 1,6% Limit 2,0% 2,0% 2,0% 10

11 Methods of testing Interpretation of results Indoor testing Propulsion sound level wot Outdoor testing Tyre sound level + crs 11

12 Methods of testing Interpretation of results Indoor testing uses and presents results in same format as outdoor (vehicle speed, engine speed and sound level as function of distance). 12

13 Tyre testing Annex Tyre/road sound Using silent vehicle (e.g. EV), ISO provides method for full tyre sound level evaluation (free rolling + torque). Tests results on tyres are comparables to default values from ISO

14 Room extension Annex 8 4. Adjustment of room dimensions Indoor testing in smaller room than 25m length is able to deliver consistent results : ex. Using both direction ex. Using acustic s propgation 14

15 Indoor/outdoor correlations Tests on 4 vehicles under different testing conditions (tracks, tyres, day-to-day) Indoor testing is able to deliver comparable results as outdoor testing within acceptable accuracy. 15

16 Conclusions Indoor testing is applicable. Specific tools permit to provide comparable behaviour as outdoor (free field, virtual sound level meter, vehicle dynamic, room lenght ). Indoor testing is able to deliver comparable results as outdoor testing within acceptable accuracy if tests procedures are defined for each facility and manufacturer s production. (Technical documentation). 16

17 Conclusions Indoor offers several benefits compared to outdoor : Controlled environment conditions to perform tests without weather constraints and dispersion. Reproducable cycles for reliable results (several modes and set-up testing, back-to-back tests, ). Indoor homologation is the first step to virtual homologation. 17

18 Thank you for attention