PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ANALYSIS (PSA) LEVEL 2. Kaliopa Mancheva
|
|
- Gyles Fitzgerald
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ANALYSIS (PSA) LEVEL 2 Kaliopa Mancheva March 16, 2017
2 WHY PSA LEVEL 2? o The safety bases are established on the principles of safety, thereby ensuring protection of those working at a nuclear facility, as well as of the population and the environment against harmful ionizing radiation at this moment and in future. These principles determine the need for risk assessment and management of nuclear facilities. The PSA is one of the basic means for risk assessment of possible releases of radioactive products into the environment and the consequences thereof o More specifically, the PSA Level 2 deals basically with the investigation and assessment of possible paths of radioactive products release after nuclear fuel damage and the possibility not to release them into the environment o Nuclear fuel damage is associated with the term severe accident March 16, 2017
3 o The implementation of such type of projects has the following objectives: A systematic analysis to achieve certainty in the nuclear facility project compliance with the main safety objectives - overall level of safety Risk assessment of releases of radioactive products into the environment after fuel damage in the reactor, spent fuel pool, storage facilities and other facilities containing radioactive material Verification of project balancing, i.e. to ascertain that there are no expressed deficiencies in terms of specific impacts Use of the source terms and frequencies to determine off-site consequences (Level 3 PSA input) Evaluation of plant design To identify potential vulnerabilities in the mitigation of severe accidents To compare design options Support and verification of SAMG Use of a range of other PSA applications in combination with the Level 1 PSA results
4 o Objectives of the specific task: Assessment of Large Early Release Frequency (LERF): it considers only the sequences, for which the releases occur in the early phase of the accident. It is used for early risk release assessments A full-scope PSA Level 2: it considers all sequences, which lead to releases into the environment, both at the early and late phase of the accident
5 SCOPE OF PSA LEVEL 2 o PSA Level 2 can have a different scope, depending on the following: The type of initiating events that are to be analyzed: Internal initiating events (which include facility-internal failures, fires and flooding) External hazards (which include seismic, tornado, strong winds, high temperatures, external fires and floodings and etc.) The facility operational modes Full power modes Low power and shutdown modes The fuel location: Reactor vessel Spent fuel pool Spent fuel storage facility
6 General Steps of Level 2 PSA Input from the Level 1 PSA core damage minimal cut-sets/accident sequences Plant familiarisation for Level 2 PSA Plant damage states definition Severe accident modelling Containment performance analysis Source term analysis Quantification Results Sensitivities, uncertainties Use of the results Information collection and familiarization with plant features that influence severe accident progression Grouping of core damage MCSs into PDSs Phenomena/ Containment Event Tree (CET) analysis Response to severe accidents Fission product transport/ release categorization CET probabilities/ quantification Frequencies of large (early) release / release categories Sources of uncertainty Identifications of severe accident vulnerabilities and other applications
7 Design aspects identification o Identify and highlight plant SSC and operating procedures that can influence: severe accidents progression containment response transport of radioactive material o o The task includes also Reactor Building, Auxiliary Building, Secondary containment and etc. Examples: core materials and geometry of the reactor internals area under the reactor pressure vessel flow paths from the area under the reactor pressure vessel to the main containment volume chemical content of the concrete features that could lead to containment bypass sequences
8 [kg-zr per MW] PWR BWR WWER ANF 10x10 GNF 10x10 Fuel Channel Control Rods Fuel Channel Box 0.5 [--] 0.78 [--] 5.6 [--] Grids and other [--] [--] x9 8x8 Total (kg) 3000 MW reactor 20,000 51,000 28,800 Channel box
9 General Steps of Level 2 PSA Input from the Level 1 PSA core damage minimal cut-sets/accident sequences Plant damage states definition Grouping of core damage MCSs into PDSs
10 Initiating Events (< 100) Initial plant Accident damage sequences states (millions) (50 to 100) Consolidated plant damage states (< 20) Accident progression / containment event tree end states (10 4 to 10 6 ) Release categories (< 20) Conditional consequence bins (< 20) Frequency * Consequence Accident sequence event trees (event probabilities from fault trees) Binning Process Combine Similar PDS Accident progression / containment event trees (branch probabilities with uncertainties) Risk Integration Stop Iterative truncation to convergence Screen on low frequency Sensitivity analysis & reconsideration of low-frequency PDS with high consequences LEVEL 1 LEVEL 1-2 Interface LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
11 o o Plant Damage State (PDS) core melt sequences identified in the Level-1 PSA grouped based on similarities in accident progression and availability of containment safeguards and other systems that might have impact on accident progression after core melt Binning process is intended to establish an interface between The plant systems analysis (Level-1 PSA) and The containment response analysis (Level-2 PSA) o Software: SAPHIRE RiskSpectrum 1.2 last version
12 General Steps of Level 2 PSA Input from the Level 1 PSA core damage minimal cut-sets/accident sequences Severe accident modelling Phenomena/ Containment Event Tree (CET) analysis
13 o Main purposes and outcomes from the deterministic analysis Time chronology of the accident physical parameters of accident progression dependencies between phenomena o Used for expert judgment assessment of probabilities for different phenomena o Software: MELCOR, MAAP, ASTEC CV070 CV092 CV091 CV050 CV060 CV012 CV013 CV014 CV015 CV016 CV017 CV022 CV023 CV024 CV025 CV026 CV027 CV032 CV033 CV034 CV035 CV036 CV037 CV042 CV043 CV044 CV045 CV046 CV047 CV052 CV053 CV054 CV055 CV056 CV057 CV040 CV010 CV020 WWER-1000 Reactor Model
14 First Phase of Accident Progression IE TBO and DC power available Covers the period from CD to vessel breach - CD = 1200 C of claddings Chronology: Time [h:m] Event Comment 0.0 IE TBO with DC available Reactor Scram, MSIV* closure Diesel generators fail to start 0:03 MCP coast down 0:58 PORV opens Pressure is >180 MPa 3:03 H 2 generation starts H 2 O-Zr 3:08 Gap release Core damage 3:36 Tcl >1200 C Core damage 4:23 Core degradation Loss of mass of CL 6:55 Vessel failure Start to eject to cavity
15 Pressure and Temperatures Primary Side pressure is controlled by PORV Temperature increase rapidly after water depletion Secondary Side pressure is controlled by SG SV SDA assumed failed (no DC power)
16 Level [m] Level [m] Levels Primary Side - Levels TAF BAF Time [hours] 2.5 Pressurizer level is maintained up to vessel failure RPV level start to decrease after SG depletion SG levels 2 Major insights: PRZ level not indicative for mass inventory in the system Time [hours]
17 Area Fraction [-] Mass [kg] Hydrogen generation Core blocking Time [hours] Hydrogen generated in in-vessel phase Time [hours] Upper FL Lowest FL Last Upper FL Lower FL Total H 2 production Simplified nodalization 5 volumes in core region H 2 production from Zr H 2 production from Steel H 2 production from B 4 C
18 o STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE PRIMARY SIDE ELEMENTS In case of a severe accident, the primary side elements operate in beyond design conditions. Therefore, an analysis is required of their operability and probability of failure, respectively. Tube bundle of the steam generator part o o The conditions of their operation are determined by deterministic analyses results with MELCOR or other integral code. The analysis of Primary Side components response is based on the following: WWER-1000 models with the ALGOR product MCP/ SG header/ pressurizer surge Steam Generator line Deterministic part: determining the ultimate capacity by using the finite elements method Probabilistic part: assessment of the probability of failure (e.g. Larson-Miller approach)
19 o A CET is a logical framework for estimating the range of consequences associated with a given accident sequence Initiating Event System failures Human actions Level 1 Level 2 Core Damage Challenges to Containment Integrity Fission Product Release to the Environment o A CET is a time-line of accident progression It represents the sequence of events that could lead to failure of the containment pressure boundary and fission product release to the environment
20 o It is a Probabilistic model It represents uncertainties in ability to predict accident progression Particular assumptions regarding each o uncertainty lead to different conclusions regarding plant response to the sequence Branch point probabilities typically NOT based on statistical analysis of data Reflect confidence that one outcome is more likely to be correct than its alternative Accident Sequence xxx Containment Response Intact Fails Late Fails Early Fission Product Release None Large Small Large Small
21 o Unlike the Level 1 event tree, branch points in a CET often have more than two possible outcomes: Branch may not simply represent success or failure of an event Often represent alternative conditions or physical process Hydrogen Concentration in Containment? 4 < Conc < 8% No burn Hydrogen Burn? Weak Deflagration None Accident Sequence xxx 8 < Conc < 14% Weak Deflagration Strong Deflagation o All branches represent sequences of interest Conc > 14% Strong Deflagation Detonation Quantification does not exclude success paths
22 RV at Low Pressure at Onset of Core Damage Injection Recovered No Vessel Breach No Early Containment Failure No MCCI No Late Containment Failure Sprays Containment Fails Early Containment Fails at VB with RCS at High Pressure Containment Fails at VB with RCS at Low Pressure Containment Bypass or Isolation Failure Containment Fails Prior to Vessel Breach RCS Not Depressurized Before Vessel Breach Containment Fails Given RCS at High Pressure RCS Depressurized at Vessel Breach Containment Fails Given RCS at Low Pressure In-vessel Steam Explosion Fails Containment Containment Fails by Overpressure During Core Degradation RCS Depressurized Before Vessel Breach High- Temperature Failure of Cavity Penetration Hydrogen Burn at Vessel Breach Fails Containment
23
24 KOZLODUY NPP EVENT TREE SARRP 59 NQ = NUMBER OF QUESTIONS (SEE LINE 2) TB-OPT 1 WHAT IS THE INITIATING EVENT? 8 VB LL MBL SML ISL SGTR TR TBO DOES THE OPERATOR DEPRESSURIZE THE RCS AFTER CD? 2 DEPR_Y DEPR_N CASES SGTR TR TBO OTHERWISE
25 General Steps of Level 2 PSA Input from the Level 1 PSA core damage minimal cut-sets/accident sequences Containment performance analysis Response to severe accidents
26 o o The analysis of containment structures response is based on the following: Deterministic part: determining the ultimate capacity by using the finite elements method Probabilistic part: assessment of the probability of failure under static and dynamic loads by creating the so-called fragility curves Software: Risk Engineering uses the SOLVIA and LSDYNA, which allows the development of 3D models of the studied objects Shell elements Models of containment and WWER-1000/В320 Reactor Building Solid elements
27 General Steps of Level 2 PSA Input from the Level 1 PSA core damage minimal cut-sets/accident sequences Source term analysis Fission product transport/ release categorization
28 o o The purpose of the analysis is to determine the following: time, location, energy and amount of the fission products released Analysis of the fractions by groups of elements of fission products released (MELCOR results) Assessment of fission products retention Using this analysis, both the full release activity, and the activities of individual nuclides, which have different consequences on the human body and soil, water, etc., are obtained. Vessel at Low Pressure No Early Contain. Failure Early F.P. Release to Pool No Core- Concrete Interaction No Late Contain. Failure Late Release to Pool Sprays Operate Auxiliary Building Retention RELEASE CATEGORY PDS LP CFE POOL DF CCI CFL POOL SPRYS AB RC Release category Release frequency, [y -1 ] Aerosol release activity, [Bq] Risk of aerosol release, [Bq/y] Contribution to the risk of aerosol release, [%] Full release [Bq] TRAR [Bq/y] Contribution to the TRAR [%] RC1 1.0E E14 1.3E E E
29 General Steps of Level 2 PSA Input from the Level 1 PSA core damage minimal cut-sets/accident sequences Quantification Results Sensitivities, uncertainties CET probabilities/ quantification Frequencies of large (early) release / release categories Sources of uncertainty
30 o Two interpretations of the concept of Probability Classical statistics: Statistical analysis of set of random data generates confidence intervals, not (strictly speaking) probability probability of frequency Bayesian: a quantity that we assign theoretically, for the purpose of representing a state of knowledge probability of probability Bayesian: Informed judgment that a particular outcome will occur reflects degree of belief of the observer. Only Bayesian interpretation is appropriate for PSA (particularly Level 2)
31 o Uncertainty : epistemic uncertainty reflects our lack of knowledge of the state of a system Can be reduced by further analysis (realistic approach) Can be reduced by changing our domain of experience (constructivist approach) aleatory variability randomness, observable measure of correspondence of our system model with the real world system Cannot be reduced by any means (for given system boundaries or for same model of a system) Very important statement aleatory variability is a property of our model and not a property of the real world system
32 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% <12 18% 82% <24 20% 80% 21% <48 79% LERF 100% 80% 60% LRF 40% 20% 0% <12 93% 7% 11% 0% 7% <24 82% 83% 7% <48 10% SFP Closed Reactor Open Reactor Insights NO big impact of releases between hours Dominant releases starts after 48 hours Dominant risk comes from POS s with closed reactor 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 38% 38% 36% 29% 13% 4% 13% 9% 2% 9% RC01 RC02 RC03 RC04 RC05 All Phenomena Isolation Failure Insights Low risk of hydrogen burning Low risk steam explosions and HPME Almost 100% of the risk for Open reactor comes from isolation failure (RC4, 5) March 16,
33 General Steps of Level 2 PSA Input from the Level 1 PSA core damage minimal cut-sets/accident sequences Use of the results Identifications of severe accident vulnerabilities and other applications
34 o Successful examples of applications of Level 2 PSA Comparison of results of the Level 2 PSA with probabilistic criteria To determine if the overall level of safety of the plant is adequate Evaluation of plant design To identify potential vulnerabilities in the mitigation of severe accidents To compare design options Development of severe accident management guidelines Use of the source terms to provide an input into emergency planning Use of the source terms and frequencies to determine off-site consequences (Level 3 PSA) Prioritization of research relating to severe accident issues Use of a range of other PSA applications in combination with the Level 1 PSA results
35 Headquarters: 10, Vihren str. Sofia 1618 Bulgaria Tel Fax: riskeng@riskeng.bg March 16, 2017
36 March 16, 2017 THANK YOU!
Introduction to Level 2 PSA
Introduction to Level 2 PSA Dr Charles Shepherd Chief Consultant, Corporate Risk Associates CRA PSA/HFA FORUM 13-14 September 2012, Bristol Accident sequences modelled by the PSA INITIATING EVENTS SAFETY
More informationMain Aspects And Results Of Level 2 PSA For KNPP WWER-1000/B320
Proceedings of the 0 th International Conference on Nuclear Option in Countries with Small and Medium Electricity Grids Zadar, Croatia, -4 June 04 Paper No. 46 Main Aspects And Results Of Level PSA For
More informationAccident Progression & Source Term Analysis
IAEA Training in Level 2 PSA MODULE 4: Accident Progression & Source Term Analysis Outline of Discussion Overview of severe accident progression and source term analysis Type of calculations typically
More informationEvaluation of a Containment Failure Frequency Considering Mitigation Accident Managements for a Japanese PWR Plant *
Evaluation of a Containment Failure Frequency Considering Mitigation Accident Managements for a Japanese PWR Plant * Osamu KAWABATA, Mitsuhiro KAJIMOTO, and buo TANAKA NUPEC/Institute of Nuclear Safety
More informationInsights and lessons learned from Level 2 PSA for Bohunice V2 plant
Insights and lessons learned from Level 2 PSA for Bohunice V2 plant MACIEJ KULIG, ENCONET Consulting, Ges. m. b. H., Auhofstrasse 58, 1130 Vienna, Austria Abstract The paper provides a brief overview of
More informationApplication of MELCOR at GRS Regarding Spent Fuel Pool Analyses and Assessment of SAMG Procedures
Application of MELCOR at GRS Regarding Spent Fuel Pool Analyses and Assessment of SAMG Procedures 7 th Meeting of the European MELCOR User Group March 17, 2015 TRACTEBEL Engineering, Brussels, Belgium
More informationTHE IAEA SAFETY ASSESSMENT EDUCATION AND TRAINING PROGRAMME (SAET)
THE IAEA SAFETY ASSESSMENT EDUCATION AND TRAINING PROGRAMME (SAET) The Safety Assessment Education and Training (SAET) Programme has been designed to support the Member States with development of required
More informationDr. Martin Sonnenkalb & Dr. Manfred Mertins GRS Cologne. Severe Accident Mitigation in German NPP - Status and Future Activities -
Dr. Martin Sonnenkalb & Dr. Manfred Mertins GRS Cologne Severe Accident Mitigation in German NPP - Status and Future Activities - Content History and status of implementation of Severe Accident Management
More informationInstrumentation and Control to Prevent and Mitigate Severe Accident Conditions
Instrumentation and Control to Prevent and Mitigate Severe Accident Conditions SAMG-D Toolkit, Module 3, Chapter 3 Martin Gajdoš Nuclear Engineering, Slovenské elektrárne IAEA Workshop on the Development
More informationAccident Sequence Analysis. Workshop Information IAEA Workshop
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Accident Sequence Analysis Lecturer Lesson Lesson IV IV 3_2.2 3_2.2 Workshop Information IAEA Workshop City, XX XX - City -XX,
More informationEXAMPLE OF SEVERE ACCIDENT MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION USING FULL SCOPE SIMULATOR
International Conference Nuclear Energy in Central Europe 2001 Hoteli Bernardin, Portorož, Slovenia, September 10-13, 2001 www: http://www.drustvo-js.si/port2001/ e-mail: PORT2001@ijs.si tel.:+ 386 1 588
More informationAssessment of Phenomenological Uncertainties in Level 2 PRAs 1
Assessment of Phenomenological Uncertainties in Level 2 PRAs 1 Hossein P. Nourbakhsh and Thomas S. Kress Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
More informationANALYSES OF AN UNMITIGATED STATION BLACKOUT TRANSIENT WITH ASTEC, MAAP AND MELCOR CODE
ANALYSES OF AN UNMITIGATED STATION BLACKOUT TRANSIENT WITH ASTEC, MAAP AND MELCOR CODE Technical Meeting on the Status and Evaluation of Severe Accident Simulation Codes for Water F. Mascari 1, J. C. De
More informationAssessing and Managing Severe Accidents in Nuclear Power Plant
Assessing and Managing Severe Accidents in Nuclear Power Plant Harri Tuomisto Fortum, Finland IAEA Technical Meeting on Managing the Unexpected - From the Perspective of the Interaction between Individuals,
More informationRISK ENGINEERING EXPERIENCE IN PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ANALYSES (PSA)
RISK ENGINEERING EXPERIENCE IN PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ANALYSES (PSA) May 14, 2013 PSA OVERVIEW o o PSA is a methodical, logical tool for deriving numerical estimates of risk from nuclear power plant (or
More informationThe Spanish Involvement
The OECD-BSAF Project: The Spanish Involvement Luis E. Herranz Unit of Nuclear Safety Research Division of Nuclear Fission Department of Energy CIEMAT BACKGROUND CIEMAT and CSN closely collaborate on severe
More informationIAEA-TECDOC-1229 Regulatory review of probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) Level 2
IAEA-TECDOC-1229 Regulatory review of probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) Level 2 Prepared jointly by the International Atomic Energy Agency and the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency July 2001 The originating
More informationEnergie braucht Impulse. Dr. Andreas Strohm Kernkraftwerk Neckarwestheim PSAM9, Hong Kong /
Approach to Quantification of Uncertainties in the Risk of Severe Accidents at NPP Neckarwestheim Unit 1 (GKN I) and the Risk Impact of Severe Accident Management Measures A. Strohm, L. Ehlkes, W. Schwarz
More informationMETHODOLOGY USING MELCOR2.1/SNAP TO ESTABLISH AN SBO MODEL OF CHINSHAN BWR/4 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
METHODOLOGY USING MELCOR2.1/SNAP TO ESTABLISH AN SBO MODEL OF CHINSHAN BWR/4 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Yu Chiang 1, Jong-Rong Wang 1,3, Hao-Tzu Lin 2, Shao-Wen Chen 1 and Chunkuan Shih 1,3 1 : Institute of Nuclear
More informationIAEA-TECDOC Probabilistic safety assessments of nuclear power plants for low power and shutdown modes
IAEA-TECDOC-1144 Probabilistic safety assessments of nuclear power plants for low power and shutdown modes March 2000 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Safety Assessment Section
More informationAccident Diagnostic, Analysis and Management (ADAM) System Applications to Severe Accident Management *
Reprint of Paper Presented at the OECD/NEA Severe Accident Management (SAM) Workshop on Operator Training and Instrumentation Capabilities, Lyon, France, 12-14 March 2001 Accident Diagnostic, Analysis
More informationDevelopment and use of SAMGs in the Krško NPP
REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA Development and use of SAMGs in the Krško NPP Tomaž Nemec Slovenian Nuclear Safety Administration tomaz.nemec@gov.si IAEA TM on the Verification and Validation of SAMGs, Vienna, 12
More informationUse of PSA to Support the Safety Management of Nuclear Power Plants
S ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS Use of PSA to Support the Safety Management of Nuclear Power Plants РР - 6/2010 ÀÃÅÍÖÈß ÇÀ ßÄÐÅÍÎ ÐÅÃÓËÈÐÀÍÅ BULGARIAN NUCLEAR REGULATORY AGENCY TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationDECOMMISSIONING LEVEL 2 PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY FOR BOILING WATER REACTORS
DECOMMISSIONING LEVEL PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY FOR BOILING WATER REACTORS Davide Mercurio 1, Vincent Andersen, KC Wagner 3 1 JENSEN HUGHES: 111 Rockville Pike, Suite 550, Rockville, MD
More informationSAM strategy&modifications and SA simulator at Paks NPP
Technical Meeting on Verification and Validation of SAMGs for Nuclear Power Plants 12-14 December 2016, Vienna, Austria SAM strategy&modifications and SA simulator at Paks NPP Éva Tóth Group Leader Safety
More informationNuclear Safety Standards Committee
Nuclear Safety Standards Committee 41 st Meeting, IAEA 21 23 Topical June, Issues 2016 Conference in Nuclear Installation Safety Agenda item Safety Demonstration of Advanced Water Cooled NPPs Title Workshop
More informationVerification of the MELCOR Code Against SCDAP/RELAP5 for Severe Accident Analysis
Verification of the Code Against SCDAP/RELAP5 for Severe Accident Analysis Jennifer Johnson COLBERT 1* and Karen VIEROW 2 1 School of Nuclear Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2017,
More informationMeetings for Sharing International Knowledge and Experience on Stress Tests
Meetings for Sharing International Knowledge and Experience on Stress Tests Presented by: Peter Hughes, Ovidiu Coman, Javier Yllera Department of Nuclear Safety and Security Division of Nuclear Installation
More informationImprovements Needed in Nuclear Power Plant Probabilistic Risk Assessments: Lessons Learned from Fukushima
Improvements Needed in Nuclear Power Plant Probabilistic Risk Assessments: Lessons Learned from Fukushima Mohammad Modarres Professor of Nuclear Engineering Department of Mechanical Engineering University
More informationLABGENE CONTAINMENT FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS
LABGENE CONTAINMENT FAILURE S AND ANALYSIS F. B. NATACCI Centro Tecnológico da Marinha em São Paulo São Paulo, Brasil Abstract Nuclear power plant containment performance is an important issue to be focused
More informationActivities on Safety Improvement of Czech NPPs in Solution of Severe Accident Issues
Activities on Safety Improvement of Czech NPPs in Solution of Severe Accident Issues Jiří Duspiva ÚJV Řež, a. s. Division of Nuclear Safety and Reliability Dept. of Severe Accidents and Thermomechanics
More informationSevere accidents management in PWRs
Severe accidents management in PWRs J. Rajzrová, J.Jiřičková Abstract According to a new trend in safety upgrades in PWRs, the nuclear power plants have started to adopt strategs to mitigate events beyond
More informationSource Terms Issues and Implications on the Nuclear Reactor Safety
Source Terms Issues and Implications on the Nuclear Reactor Safety Jin Ho Song Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute t Technical Meeting on Source Term Evaluation for Severe Accidents, Vienna International
More informationSafety Challenges for New Nuclear Power Plants
Implementing Design Extension Conditions and Fukushima Changes in the Context of SSR-2/1 Michael Case Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Outline of Presentation
More informationSafety Aspects of SMRs: A PRA Perspective
Safety Aspects of SMRs: A PRA Perspective Mohammad Modarres Minta Martin Professor of Engineering Director, Reliability Engineering Program Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Maryland,
More informationOlkiluoto 3 EPR PSA Main results and conclusions fulfillment of the regulatory requirements for operating license
Olkiluoto 3 EPR PSA Main results and conclusions fulfillment of the regulatory requirements for operating license Presented by: Heiko Kollasko Framatome Co-Authors: Roman Grygoruk AREVA Gerben Dirksen
More informationWestinghouse UK AP1000 GENERIC DESIGN ASSESSMENT. Resolution Plan for GI-AP1000-PSA-01. Success Criteria for the Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PSA)
Westinghouse UK AP1000 GENERIC DESIGN ASSESSMENT Success Criteria for the Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PSA) MAIN ASSESSMENT AREA RELATED ASSESSMENT AREA(S) RESOLUTION PLAN REVISION GDA ISSUE REVISION
More informationAnswers to Questions on the National Report
Status of the National Action Plan at the Paks NPP in Hungary on the implementation actions decided upon lessons learned from Fukushima Daiichi accident Answers to Questions on the National Report András
More informationJoint ICTP-IAEA Essential Knowledge Workshop on Deterministic Safety Analysis and Engineering Aspects Important to Safety. Trieste,12-23 October 2015
Joint ICTP- Essential Knowledge Workshop on Deterministic Safety Analysis and Engineering Aspects Important to Safety Trieste,12-23 October 2015 Safety classification of structures, systems and components
More informationSafety Research Activities on Severe Accident Management in S/NRA/R after Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident
Safety Research Activities on Severe Accident Management in S/NRA/R after Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident K. AONO, H. HOSHI, A. HOTTA, M. FUKASAWA Regulatory Standard and Research Department,
More informationFRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING INTEGRATED SITE RISK OF SMALL MODULAR REACTORS USING DYNAMIC PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT SIMULATION
FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING INTEGRATED SITE RISK OF SMALL MODULAR REACTORS USING DYNAMIC PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT SIMULATION Mohammad Modarres Nicole Y. Kim Eminent Professor April 28, 2015 PSA 2015 Sun
More informationResearch Article Assessment of Severe Accident Depressurization Valve Activation Strategy for Chinese Improved 1000 MWe PWR
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations Volume 3, Article ID 79437, pages http://dx.doi.org/.55/3/79437 Research Article Assessment of Severe Accident Depressurization Valve Activation Strategy
More informationWorking together for a safer world. Nuclear Academy. Courses in Nuclear Probabilistic Safety Assessment
Working together for a safer world Nuclear Academy Courses in Nuclear Probabilistic Safety Assessment Lloyd s Register Nuclear Academy offers a comprehensive training programme in Probabilistic Safety
More informationPSA ANALYSIS FOCUSED ON MOCHOVCE NPP SAFETY MEASURES EVALUATION FROM OPERATIONAL SAFETY POINT OF VIEW
International Conference Nuclear Energy in Central Europe 2001 Hoteli Bernardin, Portorož, Slovenia, September 10-13, 2001 www: http://www.drustvo-js.si/port2001/ e-mail: PORT2001@ijs.si tel.:+ 386 1 588
More informationCompilation of recommendations and suggestions
Post- Fukushima accident Compilation of recommendations and suggestions Peer review of stress tests performed on European nuclear power plants 26/07/2012 Compilation of Recommendations and Suggestions
More informationHPR1000: ADVANCED PWR WITH ACTIVE AND PASSIVE SAFETY FEATURES
HPR1000: ADVANCED PWR WITH ACTIVE AND PASSIVE SAFETY FEATURES D. SONG China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd. Beijing, China Email: songdy@cnpe.cc J. XING China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd. Beijing,
More informationRELAP 5 ANALYSIS OF PACTEL PRIMARY-TO-SECONDARY LEAKAGE EXPERIMENT PSL-07
Fifth International Seminar on Horizontal Steam Generators 22 March 21, Lappeenranta, Finland. 5 ANALYSIS OF PACTEL PRIMARY-TO-SECONDARY LEAKAGE EXPERIMENT PSL-7 József Bánáti Lappeenranta University of
More informationRELAP5/MOD3.2 INVESTIGATION OF A VVER-440 STEAM GENERATOR HEADER COVER LIFTING
Science and Technology Journal of BgNS, Vol. 8, 1, September 2003, ISSN 1310-8727 RELAP5/MOD3.2 INVESTIGATION OF A VVER-440 STEAM GENERATOR HEADER COVER LIFTING Pavlin P. Groudev, Rositsa V. Gencheva,
More informationDevelopment of the Methodologies for Evaluating Severe Accident Management
IAEA Technical Meeting on the Verification and Validation of Severe Accident Management Guidelines December 12-14, 2016 IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, Austria Development of the Methodologies for Evaluating
More informationWestinghouse UK AP1000 GENERIC DESIGN ASSESSMENT. Resolution Plan for GI-AP1000-PSA-01. Success Criteria for the Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PSA)
Westinghouse UK AP1000 GENERIC DESIGN ASSESSMENT Success Criteria for the Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PSA) MAIN ASSESSMENT AREA RELATED ASSESSMENT AREA(S) RESOLUTION PLAN REVISION GDA ISSUE REVISION
More informationTechnical Challenges Associated with Shutdown Risk when Licensing Advanced Light Water Reactors
Technical Challenges Associated with Shutdown Risk when Licensing Advanced Light Water Reactors Marie Pohida a1, Jeffrey Mitman a a United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, USA Abstract:
More informationLessons Learned from Fukushima-Daiichi Accident (Safety Measures and PSA Utilization)
PSAM12 2013 Tokyo Lessons Learned from Fukushima-Daiichi Accident (Safety Measures and PSA Utilization) April 15, 2013 Akio Komori (Takafumi Anegewa) Tokyo Electric Power Company All Rights Reserved 2013The
More informationThe Nuclear Crisis in Japan
The Nuclear Crisis in Japan March 21, 2011 Daniel Okimoto Alan Hanson Kate Marvel The Fukushima Daiichi Incident 1. Plant Design 2. Accident Progression 3. Radiological releases 4. Spent fuel pools " Fukushima
More informationThe Fukushima Daiichi Incident
The data and information contained herein are provided solely for informational purposes. None of the information or data is intended by AREVA to be a representation or a warranty of any kind, expressed
More informationCritical Issues Concerned with the Assessment of Passive System Reliability
IAEA Technical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment for New Nuclear Power Plants Design Vienna, October 1-5 2012 Critical Issues Concerned with the Assessment of Passive System Reliability Luciano
More informationPWR and BWR plant analyses by Severe Accident Analysis Code SAMPSON for IMPACT Project
GENES4/ANP2003, Sep. 15-19, 2003, Kyoto, JAPAN Paper 1074 PWR and BWR plant analyses by Severe Accident Analysis Code SAMPSON for IMPACT Project Hiroshi Ujita 1*, Yoshinori Nakadai 2, Takashi Ikeda 3,
More informationEffects of Source Term on Off-site Consequence in LOCA Sequence in a Typical PWR
Effects of Source Term on Off-site Consequence in LOCA Sequence in a Typical PWR Seok-Jung HAN a, Tae-Woon KIM, and Kwang-Il AHN a Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, P.O. Box 105, Yuseong, Daejeon,
More informationÚJV Řež, a. s. Research Needs for. Improvement of Severe. Accident Management. Strategies at Czech NPPs. Jiří Duspiva
ÚJV Řež, a. s. Research Needs for Improvement of Severe Accident Management Strategies at Czech NPPs Jiří Duspiva International Experts Meeting on Strengthening Research and Development Effectiveness in
More informationThe Risk of Nuclear Power
13 th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management [PSAM13] The Risk of Nuclear Power Soon Heung Chang Handong Global University Oct 4, 2016 Contents 1 2 3 4 Introduction:
More informationNuclear Safety. Lecture 3. Beyond Design Basis Accidents Severe Accidents
Nuclear safety Lecture 3. Beyond Design Basis Accidents Severe Accidents Ildikó Boros Prof. Dr. Attila Aszódi Budapest University of Technology and Economics Institute of Nuclear Techniques (BME NTI) 1
More informationModeling and Analysis of In-Vessel Melt Retention and Ex-Vessel Corium Cooling in the U. S.
Modeling and Analysis of In-Vessel Melt Retention and Ex-Vessel Corium Cooling in the U. S. E. L. Fuller, S. Basu, and H. Esmaili Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research United States Nuclear Regulatory
More informationPlant-Specific Uncertainty Analysis for a Severe Accident Pressure Load Leading to a Late Containment Failure
Plant-Specific Uncertainty Analysis for a Severe Accident Pressure Load Leading to a Late Containment Failure S.Y.Park a* and K.I.Ahn a a Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daeduk-Daero 989-111, Yusong,
More informationSupporting Deterministic T-H Analyses for Level 1 PSA
Supporting Deterministic T-H Analyses for Level 1 PSA ABSTRACT SLAVOMÍR BEBJAK VUJE, a.s. Okružná 5 918 64 Trnava, Slovakia slavomir.bebjak@vuje.sk TOMÁŠ KLIMENT VUJE, a.s. Okružná 5 918 64 Trnava, Slovakia
More informationDeterministic Safety Analyses for Human Reliability Analysis
Deterministic Safety Analyses for Human Reliability Analysis Andrej Prošek Reactor Engineering Division Jožef Stefan Institute, Slovenia Marko Čepin Faculty of Electrical Engineering University of Ljubljana,
More informationEnhancement of Nuclear Safety
Enhancement of Nuclear Safety Soon Heung Chang Handong Global University May 6, 2015 Contents 1 2 3 4 Importance of Energy Fundamentals of Nuclear Safety How to Enhance Nuclear Safety Closing Remarks 2
More informationPROBABILISTIC SAFETY ANALYSIS IN SAFETY MANAGEMENT OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ANALYSIS IN SAFETY MANAGEMENT OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 1 GENERAL 3 2 PSA DURING THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NPP 3 2.1 Probabilistic design objectives 3 2.2 Design phase 4 2.3 Construction
More informationThe Fukushima Daiichi Incident Dr. Matthias Braun - 16 November p.1
Dr. Matthias Braun - 16 November 2012 - p.1 The Fukushima Daiichi Incident 1. Plant Design 2. Accident Progression 3. Radiological releases 4. Spent fuel pools 5. Sources of Information Matthias Braun
More informationCorium Retention Strategy on VVER under Severe Accident Conditions
NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE «KURCHATOV INSTITUTE» Corium Retention Strategy on VVER under Severe Accident Conditions Yu. Zvonarev, I. Melnikov National Research Center «Kurchatov Institute», Russia, Moscow
More informationSeismic Margin Assessment for Nuclear Facilities of Kozloduy NPP
Proceedings of the 10 th International Conference on Nuclear Option in Countries with Small and Medium Electricity Grids Zadar, Croatia, 1-4 June 2014 Paper No. 121 Seismic Margin Assessment for Nuclear
More informationFukushima Event PCTRAN Analysis. Dr. LI-Chi Cliff Po. Dr. LI-Chi Cliff Po. March 25, 2011
Fukushima Event PCTRAN Analysis Dr. LI-Chi Cliff Po Fukushima Event PCTRAN Analysis Dr. LI-Chi Cliff Po 1. Description of Event March 25, 2011 The earthquake caused instant loss of offsite power. The scale-9
More informationA Methodology for Spent Fuel Pool Internal Events Level 1 and Level 2 PRA for APR1400
A Methodology for Spent Fuel Pool Internal Events Level 1 and Level 2 PRA for APR1400 Taehee Hwang 1, Inn Seock Kim 2, Jaegap Kim 3 1 KEPCO E&C, Integrated Safety Assessment Department, Gyeongsangbuk-do,
More informationTHE ASSESSMENT OF LOW PROBABILITY CONTAINMENT FAILURE MODES USING DYNAMIC PRA DISSERTATION
THE ASSESSMENT OF LOW PROBABILITY CONTAINMENT FAILURE MODES USING DYNAMIC PRA DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School
More informationTHE ROLE OF PASSIVE SYSTEMS IN ENHANCING SAFETY AND PREVENTING ACCIDENTS IN ADVANCED REACTORS
THE ROLE OF PASSIVE SYSTEMS IN ENHANCING SAFETY AND PREVENTING ACCIDENTS IN ADVANCED REACTORS M. Aziz Nuclear and radiological regulatory authority Cairo, Egypt moustafaaaai@yahoo.com Abstract Most of
More informationACCIDENT SEQUENCE PRECURSOR PROGRAM LARGE EARLY RELEASE FREQUENCY MODEL DEVELOPMENT*
ACCIDENT SEQUENCE PRECURSOR PROGRAM LARGE EARLY RELEASE FREQUENCY MODEL DEVELOPMENT* Douglas A. Brownson Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory P.O. Box 1625, MS 3850 Idaho Falls, ID 83415-3850
More informationNuclear Engineering and Technology
Nuclear Engineering and Technology 48 (2016) 1174e1183 Available online at ScienceDirect Nuclear Engineering and Technology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/net Original Article Investigation
More informationNURETH Progress on Severe Accident Code Benchmarking in the Current OECD TMI-2 Exercise
NURETH-15 544 Progress on Severe Accident Code Benchmarking in the Current OECD TMI-2 Exercise G. Bandini (ENEA), S. Weber, H. Austregesilo (GRS), P. Drai (IRSN), M. Buck (IKE), M. Barnak, P. Matejovic
More informationLicensing of New Build Reactors in the UK Part 2
Licensing of New Build Reactors in the UK Part 2 Keith Ardron UK Licensing Manager, UK Imperial College Nuclear Thermalhydraulics Course: February 2014 Contents Role of Safety Authorities & Technical Support
More informationIAEA Training in level 1 PSA and PSA applications. Other PSA s. Low power and shutdown PSA
IAEA Training in level 1 PSA and PSA applications Other PSA s Low power and shutdown PSA Content Why shutdown PSA? Definitions Plat damage states and Plant operational states Specific modelling tasks of
More informationSource terms designate typical environmental releases of radioactive substances,
1 2 Source term evaluation studies for PWRs J. FLEUROT (IRSN) J.-M. EVRARD (IRSN) B. CHAUMONT (IRSN) Source terms designate typical environmental releases of radioactive substances, which are also the
More informationIAEA, Vienna, October
IAEA, Vienna, 21-23 October 2013 1 SEVERE ACCIDENT ACTIVITIES IN BELGIUM Use of Source Term for Regulatory and Design Applications Technical Meeting on Source Term Evaluation for Severe Accidents 21-23
More informationExperiences from Application of MELCOR for Plant Analyses. Th. Steinrötter, M. Sonnenkalb, GRS Cologne March 2nd, 2010
Experiences from Application of MELCOR 1.8.6 for Plant Analyses Th. Steinrötter, M. Sonnenkalb, GRS Cologne March 2nd, 2010 Content Introduction MELCOR 1.8.6 Analyses for the Atucha II Power Plant Modeling
More informationNSSS Design (Ex: PWR) Reactor Coolant System (RCS)
NSSS Design (Ex: PWR) Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Purpose: Remove energy from core Transport energy to S/G to convert to steam of desired pressure (and temperature if superheated) and moisture content
More informationICONE ADAM: AN ACCIDENT DIAGNOSTIC, ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM APPLICATIONS TO SEVERE ACCIDENT SIMULATION AND MANAGEMENT
Proceedings of ICONE 10: 10TH International Conference on Nuclear Engineering Arlington, VA, USA, April 14-18, 2002 ICONE10-22195 ADAM: AN ACCIDENT DIAGNOSTIC, ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM APPLICATIONS
More informationSource Term modeling for CANDU reactors
Source Term modeling for CANDU reactors IAEA Technical Meeting on Source term Evaluation for Severe Accidents October 21-23, 2013 Objectives of presentation To provide overview of the current state in
More informationIn Vessel Retention Strategy VVER 1000/320 VVER 2013 Conference
ÚJV Řež, a. s. In Vessel Retention Strategy VVER 1000/320 VVER 2013 Conference J. Zdarek Presentation content Background of SA issues VVER 1000/320 Containment and RPV Cavity Configuration IVR Strategy
More informationRecent progress in source term research and evaluations with the ASTEC code
Enhancing nuclear safety Recent progress in source term research and evaluations with the ASTEC code Jacquemain D., Vola D., Cantrel L., Chevalier-Jabet K., Mun C. IRSN Nuclear Safety Division 8 th International
More informationVerification and Validation of SAMGs
Verification and Validation of SAMGs SAMG-D Toolkit, Module 3, Chapter 7 Martin Gajdoš Nuclear Engineering, Slovenské elektrárne IAEA Workshop on the Development of Severe Accident Mitigation Guidelines
More informationEnsuring Spent Fuel Pool Safety
Ensuring Spent Fuel Pool Safety Michael Weber Deputy Executive Director for Operations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission American Nuclear Society Meeting June 28, 2011 1 Insights from Fukushima Nuclear
More informationStudy on Severe Accident Progression and Source Terms in Fukushima Dai-ichi NPPs
Study on Severe Accident Progression and Source Terms in Fukushima Dai-ichi NPPs October 27, 2014 H. Hoshi, R. Kojo, A. Hotta, M. Hirano Regulatory Standard and Research Department, Secretariat of Nuclear
More informationGuidance on the Use of Deterministic and Probabilistic Criteria in Decision-making for Class I Nuclear Facilities
DRAFT Regulatory Document RD-152 Guidance on the Use of Deterministic and Probabilistic Criteria in Decision-making for Class I Nuclear Facilities Issued for Public Consultation May 2009 CNSC REGULATORY
More informationSimulation of thermal hydraulics accidental transients: evaluation of MAAP5.02 versus CATHAREv2.5
1/12 Simulation of thermal hydraulics accidental transients: evaluation of MAAP5.02 versus CATHAREv2.5 J. Bittan¹ 1) EDF R&D, Clamart (F) Summary MAAP is a deterministic code developed by EPRI that can
More informationThe NRC s SPAR Models: Current Status, Future Development, and Modeling Issues
INL/CON-08-14484 PREPRINT The NRC s SPAR Models: Current Status, Future Development, and Modeling Issues ANS PSA 2008 Topical Meeting Richard R. Sherry Peter L. Appignani Robert F. Buell September 2008
More informationState of the Art and Challenges in Level-2 Probabilistic Safety Assessment for New and Channel Type Reactors in India Abstract
State of the Art and Challenges in Level-2 Probabilistic Safety Assessment for New and Channel Type Reactors in India R.S. Rao, Avinash J Gaikwad, S. P. Lakshmanan Nuclear Safety Analysis Division, Atomic
More informationThe Fukushima Daiichi Incident Dr. Matthias Braun - 19 May p.1
Dr. Matthias Braun - 19 May 2011 - p.1 The Fukushima Daiichi Incident 1. Plant Design 2. Accident Progression 3. Radiological releases 4. Spent fuel pools 5. Sources of Information Matthias Braun PEPA4-G,
More informationChemical Engineering 693R
Chemical Engineering 693R Reactor Design and Analysis Lecture 11 Nuclear Safety Spiritual Thought 2 2 Kings 6:16 And he answered, Fear not: for they that be with us are more than they that be with them.
More informationSafety Principles and Defence-in-Depth concept implemented in German Regulations
Safety Principles and Defence-in-Depth concept implemented in German Regulations Shanna Eismar, GRS 04 October 2016 IAEA Technical Meeting on Novel Design and Safety Principles of Nuclear Power Plants
More informationSYSTEMATIC AND DESIGN SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS OF NPPS IN CZECH REPUBLIC
SYSTEMATIC AND DESIGN SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS OF NPPS IN CZECH REPUBLIC 3.10.2016 ČEZ, a. s. Meeting at IAEA Vienna Overview of topics ČEZ nuclear fleet (basic features) Systematic measures targeted to improve
More informationLFW-SG ACCIDENT SEQUENCE IN A PWR 900: CONSIDERATIONS CONCERNING RECENT MELCOR / CALCULATIONS
LFW-SG ACCIDENT SEQUENCE IN A PWR 900: CONSIDERATIONS CONCERNING RECENT MELCOR 1.8.5 / 1.8.6 CALCULATIONS F. DE ROSA ENEA FIS NUC - Bologna 1 st EUROPEAN MELCOR USERS GROUP Villigen, Switzerland 15-16
More information