ANNEX A: Logical Framework Matrix

Transcription

1 ANNEX A: Logical Framework Matrix LOGFRAME PLANNING MATRIX FOR Twinning Project Fiche: SUPPORT TO THE ACADEMY OF JUDGES IN UKRAINE, UA08/ENP-PCA/JH/11 Programme name and number: ENPI Contracting period expires: Disbursement Period expires: Duration: 24 months Total budget: ,00 Overall Objective Objectively verifiable indicators Sources of Improved and education of judges The overall objective of the Project is to resulting in the improvement of the quality of judgments and judicial services thus contributing to contribute to the strengthening of the the regain of trust and citizens Rule of Law in Ukraine, according to the Expression of confidence in the judiciary by standards of the Council of Europe, by general public improved by 5 %. improving the quality of the of Improved protection of human rights in Ukraine. judges 1. Public surveys and opinion polls from NGO s and international recognised Organisations 2. Reports from Human Rights Watch. 3. Country Progress Report within ENP 4. Annual Reports of the State Administration Project Purpose Objectively verifiable indicators Sources of The project purpose is to support the strengthening Improved capacity of the AoJ to implement the initial of the institutional capacity of the Academy of for judges Judges (AoJ) through the development of initial Improved capacity of the AoJ to perform curricula for candidate judges and activities corresponding testing and the development of Curricula for the initial are developed consolidated ongoing programmes for Unified, anonymous, transparent and competitive judges with a focus on EU law. testing system during and post the initial are operational Approved Twinning Progress Report Official Gazette of the MoJ Annual Reports of the State The draft Law on the Organization of the Judiciary and the Status of Judges is adopted by I

2 Project Purpose Objectively verifiable indicators Sources of Curricula for on EU-law of judges are developed and implemented Administration Training needs analysis have been conducted 150 judges are trained 20 trainers for the initial are trained Secondary Legislation is drafted the Parliament in 2008 Other judicial are willing to. Judges and candidate judges are widespread corruption will not hamper the introduction of new testing system Mandatory Results Objectively verifiable indicators Sources of Result 1: Initial Training curricula are developed, For Result 1: Work plan, minutes covering both practical and theoretical aspects, Training curricula are developed. from working group manuals for trainers of the initial are Manuals for trainers drafted meetings, RTAs elaborated, and trainers for the initial are Trainers are trained reports, records at trained, necessary secondary legislation is drafted. Secondary Legislation drafted AoJ. Result 2: Testing and selection criteria and materials for the examination of candidates for judges during and post the initial are developed ensuring a unified, transparent and anonym examination, necessary secondary legislation is drafted; qualified examiners are identified, approved and trained. For Result 2: Testing system for the selection of candidates for during and after the initial is set up Secondary Legislation is drafted Testing criteria are defined Examiners identified and trained Approved Twinning Progress Reports Attendance lists of trained judges Manuals for trainers For Result 1: Judicial (Ministry of Justice, Supreme, High Council, High Qualificatio n II

3 Mandatory Results Objectively verifiable indicators Sources of Result 3: Ongoing Training of judges with a focus on EU Law is implemented; distance or e-learning curricula for the ongoing have been developed. For Result 3: Curricula for Training of Judges in EU law are developed 15 courses have been implemented with at least 150 judges trained Concept paper for the development of e learning or distance learning is drafted Manuals for Examiners Concept paper on e- /distance learning Commission s )are willing to For Result 2: Judicial (Ministry of Justice, Supreme court, High Council, High Qualificatio n Commission s )are willing to Judges are For Result 3: Judges are III

4 Activities Means (indicative) Component A: A.1. Analysis of Initial Training of Judges in EU A.2. Assessment of judicial in Ukraine and gap analysis A.3. Drafting of Initial Training Programme (theoretical and practical part)-manual A.4. Preparation of materials for the initial A.5. Prepare curricula for Training of the Trainers A.6. Identification 100 trainers A.7. Performance of 4 five days Training of the Trainer Seminars for 25 participants each A.8. Study Tour to judicial inside the EU Member State 1 A.9. Study Tour to judicial inside the EU Member State 2 A.10. Assistance in drafting secondary legislation A.11. Drafting of materials for court practice (RTA throughout the project) Component A: short term experts (160 days in total, 15 missions) 2 one week study tours to judicial in EU Member States for 5 participant each Component B: B.1. Assessment of judicial testing in Ukraine and identification of shortcomings B.2.Definition of the subjects and objectives of the tests and the criteria for becoming a judge B.3.Assistance to the modus of the tests (oral and written parts) B.4.Development of model solutions for written tests B.5.Development of score sheets B.6.assistance to the identification of examiners, their appointment and function B.7 Study Tour to judicial testing inside the EU Member State 1 B.8. Study Tour to judicial testing inside the EU Member State 2 B.9. Prepare curricula for Examiners B.10. Identification 100 examiners B.11. Performance of 4 five days Training of the Examiners Seminars for 25 participants each Component B: short term experts (180 days in total, 16 missions) 2 one week study tours to judicial in EU Member States for 5 participant each IV

5 Activities Means (indicative) Component C: C.1. Training Needs analysis C.2. Drafting of curricula C.3. Preparation of materials C.4. Identification of participants C.5 Performance of 15 three days sessions for judges on EU law, 25 participants each C.6. Assistance to the development of e learning/distance learning concept paper C.7. Preparation of distance learning materials Component C: short term experts, (130 days in total, 17 missions) V