Introduction to SEAHORSE Project. Osman Turan 13/10/2015 Rotterdam

Transcription

1 Introduction to SEAHORSE Project Osman Turan 13/10/2015 Rotterdam 1

2 SEAHORSE Safety Enhancement in transport by Achieving Human Orientated Resilient Shipping Environment FP7 Project Under Technology Transfer November October

3 SEAHORSE Project The SEAHORSE project aims to achieve meaningful improvements in shipping safety by addressing human and organisational factors through transferring the well proven practices and methodologies from air transport to maritime transport in an effective, collaborative and innovative manner. Implementing multilevel resilience engineering principles Identifying the functional demands of ship operations, crew needs, limitations and capabilities. Developing a methodology to manage non-standard practices Implement the developed solutions and validate them for specific scenarios 3

4 SEAHORSE Consortium STRATHCLYDE UNIVERSITY (MARINE) TNO(AIR-MARINE) DEEPBLUE (AIR) LLOYD S REGISTER EMEA (AIR-MARINE) SATAKUNTA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES (MARINE) CALMAC FERRIES LTD (MARINE) DANAOS SHIPPING (MARINE) JUMBO SHIPPING (MARINE) TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN (AIR) ESM (AIR-MARINE) AP&A Ltd (MARINE) KRATIS TRAINING AND CONSULTING LTD (AIR) ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY (MARINE) UK NL IT UK FI UK CY NL IRL ES GR/UK CY TR 4

5 SEAHORSE Advisory Board AIRBUS (AIR) UK MARITIME COASTGUARD AGENCY (MARINE) LOGAN AIR (AIR) ZODIAC SHIPPING ( MARINE) CYPRUS AIRWAYS (AIR) SENER PETROL (MARINE) SWEDISH CLUB (P&I) FINNISH MARITIME ADMINISTRATION (MARINE) KLINE LNG ( MARINE) GASLOG(MARINE) EASYJET( AIR) AENA (AIRPORT-OPERATOR) SASEMAR (MARINE) STASA (AIR) HILL ROBINSON INTERNATIONAL INC (MARINE) CARNIVAL CRUISE (MARINE) 5

6 Why? Despite advances in design, on-board navigational and communicational equipment, and training facilities, accidents occur regularly causing safety problems for people on board, ships, cargo and environment FACTS: More than 100,000 vessels registered worldwide Around 600 accidents a year Over 100 vessels lost a year CURRENT APPROACH: Focusing on Technical solutions Solutions proposed after the occurrence of accidents CRITICISM : Reactive? Overregulated? Too Much Reliance on Rules? 6

7 Facts: Are we missing something? Nearly 90% of all the incidents, including merchant vessels sailing under the UK flag, are directly caused by human/organisational factors, like poor decision makingor wrong passage planning We generally identify the problem but we fail to take the next step towards finding solutions to prevent accidents

8 Why? How? 1. Identify how errors and non-standard practices were managed successfully in air transport From Aviation SEAHORSE Outputs 2. Check the feasibility of applying best practices and resilience concepts to improve human/organisational errors and safety in shipping Technology Transfer 3. Develop the Technology Transfer Framework from air to marine for successful implementation To Maritime 8

9 Why? Procedures 9

10 WP2 Sector Profiling: User Needs OBJECTIVES Deliver an as is profile of the maritime industry Review occurrence data to supplement as is picture with non-normal situations Produce a comprehensive gap analysis report Identify user needs Influence the focus areas of transfer 10

11 WP2 WP3

12 Maritime user needs and gap analysis 46 gaps identified Gap analysis & identification template utilised Bi-lateral workshops convened per topic once these tasks were completed Purpose to identify and detail gaps existing between sectors Gap analysis & identification template completed in plenary at the end of this workshop (or in a subsequent meeting) Mandatory Safety Reports #19 Reluctance to report, #40 Maturity & capability of reporting : #1 Standardisation, #6 Transnational regulation, #35 Advanced tackling of Human & Organisational Factors Safety Culture Training #17 & 18 Maturity and capability of HF training, #20 Lack of standardised training #36 Standardisation (Operational demands>inspections & checks) Pre-flight Checklist 12

13 Manufacturers Training Regulation Licencing Main gap themes Lack of transnational regulatory body Lack of central data source for checks and inspections Standardisation Centralisation Work & Rest hours Social benefits Economic pressures Commercialisation of safety Safety as a commercial value More rest hours in aviation, more monitoring Social benefits are poorer in maritime and workers often only paid when on board In aviation salaries for pilots were not related to flying hours but low-budget carriers are changing this Disimprovement Implications for safety Safety has a commercial value in aviation (passenger focus) Maritime is different due to cargo focus Continued investment in safety in aviation despite lack of firm evidence of benefits Growth of cruising sector may change this 13

14 Review of Two Sectors Aviation and maritime are two transport sectors with different levels of safety maturity and it stands to reason that they approach safety data differently. It s clear that aviation still has improvements to make in safety Also clear that maritime is facing issues similar to ones tackled by aviation non-compliance with standard procedures, distraction. 14

15 WP3 Objectives Scope of Transfer and Implementation Strategy 1. Identify and document the aeronautical resilience resources (solutions) together with the improvements achieved through their application in air transport. 2. Definition of the Scope of Transfer through mapping between potential solutions and identified user needs. 3. Feasibility of identified technologies and concepts which are to be transferred 4. Development of the SEAHORSE Implementation Strategy.

16 16

17 Step 1 Database of Resilience Resources OBJECTIVE APPROACH OUTCOME Identify & compile a database of successfully implemented resilience resources (solutions) in air transport Stakeholders and safety experts interviews Literature analysis Research review Database with 166 solutions Topics Airborne area Maintenance area Air Traffic Control area Airport area Transversal area (solutions that address two or more specific areas) Data Gathered Area of resilience improvement Resilience level Ability Resource description Relevant documentation Solution keywords Monitoring strategies Performance indicators

18 Step 2 Resources evaluation & selection OBJECTIVE APPROACH OUTCOME Evaluate the potential impact of solution implementation into maritime domain Definition of evaluation criteria Resources evaluation by endusers Resources selected and ranked Most promising solutions most promising 3 main criteria: to be Promising solutions Availability transferred to of the promising solution for in the maritime Promising domain; solutions to be further the maritime transferability Applicability domain in our of the solution to the maritime investigated domain; experts not considered as the promising for Nice to have opinion top priority for safety transferability improvements for our solutions Impact highly on safety, experts; to assess how much not safety considered would as beneficial for the top priority for benefit from the implementation of the proposed maritime however, the solution. safety solutions in this category were rated as highly beneficial for maritime safety. safety improvements for our experts; Mixed data collected on the availability in the maritime sector. promising for transferability Rated as nice to have even if without a major impact on safety; unclear data on availability in maritime sector. 9 solutions 6 solutions 10 solutions 48 solutions

19 Step 3 Resources mapping onto scenarios OBJECTIVE APPROACH OUTCOME Map the selected solutions onto the three scenarios under analysis Experts evaluation based on the solutions ranking Identification of the solutions able to address scenario issues

20 Step 4 Feasibility Analysis Pre-flight checklist OBJECTIVE APPROACH OUTCOME Feasibility evaluation Estimate the applicability of Application example Workshops Feasibility of transfer and the selected solutions to the Validation & consolidation expected improvement areas maritime domain Standard checklists covering all aspects of ship Workshop operation, focussing on pre-arrival, pre-departure and contingencies. The standard should not only cover the essential checks, but also be of a format that does not allow violations. Legal/Regulatory implications Evaluation questions The maritime equivalence is the Ship Operating Manual. Depending on the task, there may be requirements in regulations. A lot of the material giving checklist guidance is non-regulatory and Legal/Regulatory implication provided by industry Development requirements Implementation requirements Adoption requirements Cost/Benefit Short term (<1 year) analysis Expected time required for implementation and adoption Expected benefits Short term (up to 3 years) Standard checklists when designed correctly, will immediately improve resilience during routine departure and arrival operations. They will also significantly change outcomes when appropriately implemented during emergencies.

21 Step 5 Implementation strategy OBJECTIVE APPROACH OUTCOME Integration of the selected solutions into the maritime SMS and organisational structure Working groups for data collection and solutions customisation Validation workshop Step-by-step implementation plans Data collected Characteristics of the organisation Resources available in the organisation SMS and regulatory framework Solution safety needs Examples of organisations that implemented the solution Standardisation requirements Features to be developed / Activities to be carried out Monitoring strategies and performance indicators ImplementationStrategiesfor each solution & Implementation Plans for each Scenario

22 Resilience Resilience is the intrinsic ability of a system to adjust its functioning prior to, during, or following changes and disturbances, so that it can sustain required operations under both expected and unexpected conditions Hollnagel, 2011

23 Multilevel Resilience Assessment Method Instrument (questionnaire) to assess resilience Resilience abilities: Anticipate, Monitor, Respond, Learn Of maritime, multilevel socio-technical systems Individual, team, organisation, multiparty, technique In the past (incident analysis), present (current operations) and future (design).

24 Knowledge transfer from aeronautics industry Crew profile Operational profile Needs, demands scenarios SMART procedure methodology Crew database Ship database Company database Non-standard acts database Rules and standards database Gap analysis Strategies, resources Multi-level resilience model Virtual platform Initial validation Resilience resources Implementation strategies Resilience Assessment Methods Crew quality assessment tool Procedure assessment & development tool Company multi-level resilience assessment tool Multi-level resilience design tool Crew database generation tool

25 WHAT WAS ACHIEVED SO FAR AIR TRANSPORT AND MARITIME CAN AND SHOULD WORK TOGETHER TO ENHANCE SAFETY THERE IS A MASSIVE POTENTIAL THAT BEST PRACTICES IN ANOTHER TRANSPORT CAN BENEFIT OTHER TRANSPORT. HOWEVER, BEST PRACTICES IN ONE TRANSPORT REQUIRE ADAPTION PROCESS TO MAKE IT USEFUL IN OTHER TRANSPORT MODES. SOLUTIONS HAVE POTENTIAL INTEROPERABILITY 25

26 WHAT WAS ACHIEVED THERE ARE GAPS BETWEEN TWO TRANSPORT MODES MOST IMPORTANT ONE IS POSSIBLY THE DIFFERENT LEVEL OF SAFETY CULTURE. IN TODAY S WORKSHOP WE WILL PRESENT THE PROGRESS IN WORKAROUNDS RESILIENCE FRAMEWORK 26

27 Thank You 27