Stationary Noise Assessment. 70 Richmond Road. Ottawa, Ontario
|
|
- Britney Lloyd
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Stationary Noise Assessment 70 Richmond Road Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE Stationary Noise Prepared For: Stephen Job 109 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 302B Toronto, Ontario M6K 1X4 Prepared By: Michael Lafortune, Environmental Technologist Joshua Foster, P.Eng., Partner March 2, Walgreen Road, Ottawa, Ontario K0A 1L0 T (613)
2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document describes a stationary noise assessment performed for a proposed high end coffee shop development at 70 Richmond Road in Ottawa, Ontario. The existing portion of the building rises approximately 4.75 meters (m) above local grade, while the new addition will rise approximately 3 m above local grade. The site is located near the Richmond Road and Island Park Drive intersection. The primary sources of stationary noise from the development are rooftop mechanical equipment and idling cars associated with the drive through queueing lane. Figure 1 illustrates a site plan with surrounding context. The assessment is based on: (i) theoretical noise prediction methods that conform to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOE) and City of Ottawa requirements; (ii) noise level criteria as specified by the City of Ottawa s Environmental Noise Control Guidelines (ENCG); and (iii) architectural drawings provided by Vandenberg & Wildeboer Architects. Our stationary noise assessment for the proposed high end coffee shop development at 70 Richmond Road indicates that provided our recommendations are considered in the detailed design process, noise levels at nearby points of reception are expected to fall below the City of Ottawa and MOE noise criteria. Assuming the worst case scenario, the noise impacts from the rooftop mechanical unit and drive through queueing lane can be mitigated with the installation of noise screens and appropriate unit selection as outlined in Section 5. As such, the proposed development is expected to be compatible with the existing noise sensitive land uses. As this study is based on preliminary mechanical information, final mechanical equipment selection and locations should be reviewed by an acoustical engineer prior to installation of the equipment. 70 Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment i
3 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE Assumptions 1 3. OBJECTIVES 2 4. METHODOLOGY Background Stationary Noise Source Assessment and Criteria Determination of Noise Source Power Levels Stationary Noise Source Predictions 4 5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 6 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 FIGURES APPENDICES: Appendix A STAMSON 5.04 Input and Output Data 70 Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment ii
4 1. INTRODUCTION Gradient Wind Engineering Inc. (GWE) was retained by to undertake a stationary noise assessment of a proposed high end coffee shop development at 70 Richmond Road in Ottawa, Ontario. This report focuses on the noise impacts from rooftop mechanical equipment and a drivethrough on nearby residential noise sensitive areas. This study is based on architectural and site plan drawings provided by Vandenberg & Wildeboer Architects and street layouts obtained from the City of Ottawa, and recent satellite imagery. 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE The site is located near the Richmond Road & Island Park Drive intersection, and is surrounded by mixeduse land, specifically Traditional Mainstreet and Residential zones. The closest points of reception are located at 376 Island Park Drive (noise sensitive residential purpose building) to the south of the development. Figure 1 illustrates the site plan and surrounding context. The proposed development is a single story high end coffee shop. The existing portion of the building rises approximately 4.75 meters (m) above local grade, while the new addition will rise approximately 3 m above local grade. A drive through for the high end coffee shop will run to the west and south of the building. The business may operate up to 24 hours per day. Figure 2 illustrates the location of all stationary noise sources for the development. 2.1 Assumptions Preliminary mechanical information for the development has been provided by Goodkey Weedmark and Associates Ltd. A review of final equipment selection and locations by a qualified acoustical engineer will be required prior to installation of the equipment. The following assumptions have been included in the analysis: (i) (ii) (iii) The quantity, tonnage and sound data of rooftop units have been specified by Goodkey Weedmark and Associates Ltd. The locations of rooftop units have been assumed based on information from Goodkey Weedmark and Associates Ltd., and GWE s experience with similar developments The quantity and locations of idling cars in the high end coffee shop drive through queue has been specified by, and Parsons (traffic consultant) 70 Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment 1
5 (iv) The sound data of idling cars in the high end coffee shop drive through queue has been assumed based on GWE s experience with similar developments (v) During daytime/evening hours (07:00 23:00), the rooftop mechanical units (RTU) on the building are in full operation and there are 8 cars in the drive through (vi) During nighttime hours (23:00 07:00), the rooftop mechanical units on the building are in 50% operation and there are no idling cars in the drive through (vii) Drive through in operation during daytime hours 07:00 to 23:00. The equipment considered in the model consisted of: (i) (ii) 7.5 Ton Roof Top Unit (RTU) (S1) Idling cars 8 (S2 S9) 3. OBJECTIVES The main goals of the work are to assess the anticipated noise impacts from rooftop mechanical equipment and drive through on nearby residential sensitive receptors and, where necessary, describe noise control measures to ensure the development can operate in the area in compliance with the City of Ottawa s ENCG. 4. METHODOLOGY 4.1 Background Noise can be defined as any obtrusive sound. It is created at a source, transmitted through a medium, such as air, and intercepted by a receiver. Noise may be characterized in terms of the power of the source or the sound pressure at a specific distance. While the power of a source is characteristic of that source, the sound pressure depends on the location of the receiver and the path that the noise takes to reach the receiver. Its measurement is based on the decibel unit, dba, which is a logarithmic ratio referenced to a standard noise level ( Pascals). The A suffix refers to a weighting scale, which represents the noise perceived by the human ear. With this scale, a doubling of sound power at the source results in a 3 dba increase in measured noise levels at the receiver, and is just perceptible to most people. An increase of 10 dba is often perceived to be twice as loud. Stationary sources are defined in the City of Ottawa s ENCG as: all sources of sound and vibration, whether fixed or mobile, that exist or operate on a premises, property or facility. The combined sound 70 Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment 2
6 and vibration levels of which are emitted beyond the property boundary of the premises, property or facility, unless the source(s) is (are) due to construction. The guidelines do not apply to gas stations, and occasional movement of vehicles on property, such as infrequent deliveries of goods to convenience stores 1. Amplified speech, such as those from call boxes, are also exempt from the requirements of the ENCG and MOE guidelines Stationary Noise Source Assessment and Criteria The equivalent sound energy level, L EQ, provides a weighted measure of the time varying noise levels, which is well correlated with the annoyance of sound. It is defined as the continuous sound level, which has the same energy as a time varying noise level over a selected period of time. For stationary sources, the L EQ is calculated on an hourly interval, while for roadways, the L EQ is calculated on the basis of a 16 hour daytime / 8 hour nighttime split. Noise criteria taken from the ENCG apply to outdoor points of reception (POR). A POR is defined under ENCG as any location on a noise sensitive land use where noise from a stationary source is received. A POR can be located on an existing or zoned for future use premises of permanent or seasonal residences, hotels/motels, nursing/retirement homes, rental residences, hospitals, camp grounds, and noise sensitive buildings such as schools, places of worship and daycare facilities. According to the ENCG, the recommended maximum noise level for an urban (Class 1) environment at a POR is either the lowest onehour background noise level due to other sources, or the exclusionary limits outlined in Table 1, whichever is higher. TABLE 1: EXCLUSIONARY LIMITS FOR CLASS 1 AREA Time of Day Outdoor Points of Reception Plane of Window 07:00 23: :00 07:00 N/A 45 As the subject site is located adjacent to arterial roadways, which produce a high level of ambient noise, calculations were performed to determine appropriate background noise levels due to traffic to compare against the noise impacts from the stationary source. Traffic data for the Richmond Road and Island Park 1 ENCG, Section 1.5.1, page 23 2 Annex to Publication LU 131, Section A2.1.1(b), page A3 70 Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment 3
7 Drive intersection were obtained from the City of Ottawa; however, these data were limited to daytime and evening hourly traffic volumes. GWE has performed calculations using the STAMSON software at Receptor 1 and 2 (see Figure 3 for receptor locations). The results were extrapolated to other nearby receptors where appropriate. Calculations were based on the lowest hourly traffic volumes of 736 and 1074 vehicles per hour on Richmond Road and Island Park Drive respectively. The mix of vehicles was assumed to be comprised of 7% medium trucks and 5% heavy trucks, as per ENCG Table 1.7. It was also assumed the proposed development would act as noise barriers. For the source to receiver path, hard / reflective ground was assumed given the majority of the ground surface will be covered by asphalt. The results of the background noise calculations indicate ambient noise levels at Receptors 1 and 2 will approach 63 and 53 dba respectively. Details of the calculations are presented in Appendix A. 4.3 Determination of Noise Source Power Levels Table 2 summarizes the sound power levels of each source assumed in our analysis. Source locations are illustrated in Figure 2. TABLE 2: EQUIPMENT SOUND POWER LEVELS (dba) Source ID Description Frequency (Hz) Total S1 7.5 Ton RTU S2 9 Idling Cars N/A N/A N/A N/A 82 N/A N/A N/A Stationary Noise Source Predictions The impact of the stationary noise sources on the nearby residential areas was determined by computer modelling. Stationary noise source modelling is based on the software program Predictor Lima developed from the International Standards Organization (ISO) standard 9613 Parts 1 and 2. This computer program is capable of representing three dimensional surfaces and first reflections of sound waves over a suitable spectrum for human hearing. The methodology has been used on numerous assignments, and has been accepted by the MOE as part of Environmental Compliance Approvals applications. A total of 13 receptor locations were chosen around the site to measure the noise impact at points of reception (POR) during the daytime/evening (07:00 23:00) and nighttime (23:00 07:00) periods, as illustrated in Figure 3. POR locations included outdoor points of reception (OPOR) and the plane of windows (POW) of the surrounding residential properties. Sensor locations are described in Table 3 and illustrated in Figure 3. All units and idling cars were represented as point sources in the Predictor model. 70 Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment 4
8 Air temperature, pressure and humidity were assumed at 10 C, kpa and 70%, respectively. Ground absorption over the study area was determined based on topographical features (such as water, concrete, grassland, etc.). An absorption value of 0 is representative of hard ground, while a value of 1 represents grass, and similar soft surface conditions. Existing and proposed buildings were added to the model to account for screening and reflection effects from building façades. TABLE 3: RECEPTOR LOCATIONS Receptor Number Location Height Above Grade (m) R1 POW 376 Island Park Drive 4.5 R2 OPOR 376 Island Park Drive 1.5 R3 POW 381 Leighton Terrace 4.5 R4 OPOR 381 Leighton Terrace 1.5 R5 POW 114 Richmond Road 1.5 R6 POW 114 Richmond Road 23.5 R7 POW 101 Richmond Road 16.5 R8 POW 85 Richmond Road 4.5 R9 POW 348 Island Park Drive 4.5 R10 OPOR 348 Island Park Drive 1.5 R11 POW 351 Island Park Drive 4.5 R12 OPOR 351 Island Park Drive 1.5 R13 POW 375 Island Park Drive Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment 5
9 5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Unmitigated noise levels at nearby sensitive receptors appear to exceed the ENCG criteria, as summarized in Table 4 below, due to the close proximity of rooftop mechanical equipment and drive through queue lane. The sound levels listed in Table 4 assume the worst case scenario. Receptor Number TABLE 4: UNMITIGATED NOISE LEVELS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES Plane of Window Receptor Location Noise Level (dba) Sound Level Limits Meets ENCG Criteria Day Night Day Night Day Night R1 POW 376 Island Park Drive * 45 YES NO R2 OPOR 376 Island Park Drive * N/A NO YES R3 POW 381 Leighton Terrace NO NO R4 OPOR 381 Leighton Terrace N/A NO YES R5 POW 114 Richmond Road YES YES R6 POW 114 Richmond Road YES YES R7 POW 101 Richmond Road YES YES R8 POW 85 Richmond Road YES YES R9 POW 348 Island Park Drive YES YES R10 OPOR 348 Island Park Drive N/A YES YES R11 POW 351 Island Park Drive YES YES R12 OPOR 351 Island Park Drive N/A YES YES R13 POW 375 Island Park Drive YES YES * Background noise level from roadway traffic As Table 4 summarizes, noise levels are elevated at Receptors 1 to 4. The main contributors of noise at these locations are the rooftop mechanical unit (Source S1), as well as well as idling vehicles associated with the drive through queueing lane (Sources S2 S9). Given the close proximity of Receptors 1 and 2 to local roadways, the ambient noise level from roadway traffic at these locations is above the exclusionary noise criteria listed in Section 4.2. As such, the criteria for Receptors 1 and 2 have been taken to be the ambient noise level. 70 Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment 6
10 For the drive through, a 2.2 m tall noise barrier located on the south property line (see Figure 2) was found to be an effective way to reduce the noise levels from idling cars. To control noise levels from the RTU, it is recommended to select a unit with a sound power equal to or less than 83 dba (referenced to a picowatt). Alternatively, a noise screen around the unit or extending the roof parapet, to a height of 0.2 m above the RTU, would allow for a slightly louder RTU to be used. With a noise screen, the required maximum sound power of the RTU is 88 dba. Noise barriers will be constructed from materials having a minimum surface density of 20 kg/m 2 or a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 30. Overnight (23:00 to 07:00) operations of the drive through would be prohibited. With these recommendations, Table 5 summarizes the mitigated noise levels at each POR, which demonstrates compliance with ENCG criteria. Receptor Number TABLE 5: MITIGATED NOISE LEVELS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES Plane of Window Receptor Location Noise Level (dba) Sound Level Limits Meets ENCG Criteria Day Night Day Night Day Night R1 POW 376 Island Park Drive * 45 YES YES R2 OPOR 376 Island Park Drive * N/A YES YES R3 POW 381 Leighton Terrace YES YES R4 OPOR 381 Leighton Terrace N/A YES YES R5 POW 114 Richmond Road YES YES R6 POW 114 Richmond Road YES YES R7 POW 101 Richmond Road YES YES R8 POW 85 Richmond Road YES YES R9 POW 348 Island Park Drive YES YES R10 OPOR 348 Island Park Drive N/A YES YES R11 POW 351 Island Park Drive YES YES R12 OPOR 351 Island Park Drive N/A YES YES R13 POW 375 Island Park Drive YES YES * Background noise level from roadway traffic 70 Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment 7
11
12
13
14
15 FIGURE 4: DAYTIME/EVENING UNMITIGATED NOISE CONTOURS (1.5 METERS ABOVE GRADE) db db db db db db db db db db 0 35 db 70 Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment 12
16 FIGURE 5: NIGHTTIME UNMITIGATED NOISE CONTOURS (1.5 METERS ABOVE GRADE) db db db db db db db db db db 0 35 db 70 Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment 13
17 FIGURE 6: DAYTIME/EVENING MITIGATED NOISE CONTOURS (1.5 METERS ABOVE GRADE) db db db db db db db db db db 0 35 db 70 Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment 14
18 FIGURE 7: NIGHTTIME MITIGATED NOISE CONTOURS (1.5 METERS ABOVE GRADE) db db db db db db db db db db 0 35 db 70 Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment 15
19 APPENDIX A STAMSON INPUT AND OUTPUT DATA 70 Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment A 1
20 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :00:22 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r1.te Description: Time Period: 1 hours Road data, segment # 1: RichmondL Car traffic volume : 945 veh/timeperiod Medium truck volume : 75 veh/timeperiod Heavy truck volume : 54 veh/timeperiod Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 1: RichmondL Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : m Receiver height : 4.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 5.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 9.80 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment A 2
21 Road data, segment # 2: RichmondR Car traffic volume : 945 veh/timeperiod Medium truck volume : 75 veh/timeperiod Heavy truck volume : 54 veh/timeperiod Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 2: RichmondR Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : m Receiver height : 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Road data, segment # 3: IslandL Car traffic volume : 647 veh/timeperiod Medium truck volume : 52 veh/timeperiod Heavy truck volume : 37 veh/timeperiod Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 3: IslandL Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : m Receiver height : 4.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 4.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 8.50 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment A 3
22 Road data, segment # 4: IslandR Car traffic volume : 647 veh/timeperiod Medium truck volume : 52 veh/timeperiod Heavy truck volume : 37 veh/timeperiod Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 4: IslandR Angle1 Angle2 : deg 0.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : m Receiver height : 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment A 4
23 Results segment # 1: RichmondL Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 4.50! 3.76! 3.76 ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: RichmondR Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba 70 Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment A 5
24 Results segment # 3: IslandL Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 4.50! 4.01! 4.01 ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq * * Bright Zone! Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 4: IslandR Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES: Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment A 6
25 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :00:31 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r2.te Description: Time Period: 1 hours Road data, segment # 1: Richmond Car traffic volume : 945 veh/timeperiod Medium truck volume : 75 veh/timeperiod Heavy truck volume : 54 veh/timeperiod Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 1: Richmond Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : m Receiver height : 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 5.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 7.00 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment A 7
26 Road data, segment # 2: IslandL Car traffic volume : 647 veh/timeperiod Medium truck volume : 52 veh/timeperiod Heavy truck volume : 37 veh/timeperiod Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 2: IslandL Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : m Receiver height : 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 4.00 m Barrier receiver distance : m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment A 8
27 Road data, segment # 3: IslandR Car traffic volume : 647 veh/timeperiod Medium truck volume : 52 veh/timeperiod Heavy truck volume : 37 veh/timeperiod Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 3: IslandR Angle1 Angle2 : deg 0.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : m Receiver height : 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 4.00 m Barrier receiver distance : m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment A 9
28 Results segment # 1: Richmond Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: IslandL Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba 70 Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment A 10
29 Results segment # 3: IslandR Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES: Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment A 11
30 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :00:37 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r2b.te Time Period: 1 hours Description: Mitigated case with 2.2 m tall barrier Road data, segment # 1: RichmondR Car traffic volume : 945 veh/timeperiod Medium truck volume : 75 veh/timeperiod Heavy truck volume : 54 veh/timeperiod Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 1: RichmondR Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : m Receiver height : 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 5.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 7.00 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment A 12
31 Road data, segment # 2: IslandL Car traffic volume : 647 veh/timeperiod Medium truck volume : 52 veh/timeperiod Heavy truck volume : 37 veh/timeperiod Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 2: IslandL Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : m Receiver height : 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 4.00 m Barrier receiver distance : m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment A 13
32 Road data, segment # 3: IslandR Car traffic volume : 647 veh/timeperiod Medium truck volume : 52 veh/timeperiod Heavy truck volume : 37 veh/timeperiod Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 3: IslandR Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : m Receiver height : 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 4.00 m Barrier receiver distance : m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment A 14
33 Road data, segment # 4: RichmondL Car traffic volume : 945 veh/timeperiod Medium truck volume : 75 veh/timeperiod Heavy truck volume : 54 veh/timeperiod Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 4: RichmondL Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : m Receiver height : 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 2.20 m Barrier receiver distance : 1.00 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment A 15
34 Road data, segment # 5: IslandRR Car traffic volume : 647 veh/timeperiod Medium truck volume : 52 veh/timeperiod Heavy truck volume : 37 veh/timeperiod Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 5: IslandRR Angle1 Angle2 : deg 0.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : m Receiver height : 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : 0.00 deg Barrier height : 2.20 m Barrier receiver distance : m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment A 16
35 Road data, segment # 6: IslandRRR Car traffic volume : 647 veh/timeperiod Medium truck volume : 52 veh/timeperiod Heavy truck volume : 37 veh/timeperiod Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 6: IslandRRR Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : m Receiver height : 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : 0.00 deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 5.00 m Barrier receiver distance : m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment A 17
36 Results segment # 1: RichmondR Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: IslandL Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba 70 Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment A 18
37 Results segment # 3: IslandR Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 4: RichmondL Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba 70 Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment A 19
38 Results segment # 5: IslandRR Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 6: IslandRRR Source height = 1.50 m Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES: Richmond Road: Stationary Noise Assessment A 20
Stationary Noise Assessment. Orléans Gardens. Ottawa, Ontario
Stationary Noise Assessment Orléans Gardens Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-053 Stationary Noise Prepared For: Prepared By: Michael Lafortune, Environmental Technologist Joshua Foster, P.Eng., Associate
More informationStationary Noise Assessment. Car Dealership Strandherd Drive. Ottawa, Ontario
Stationary Noise Assessment Car Dealership Strandherd Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE14-114 - Noise Prepared For: Lewis Treimstra 1805 Woodward Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2C 0P9 Prepared By: Michael Lafortune,
More informationStationary Noise Feasibility Assessment. 315 Chapel Street Ottawa, Ontario
Stationary Noise Feasibility Assessment 315 Chapel Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-002 - Stationary Noise Prepared For: Leanne Moussa Allsaints 10 Blackburn Avenue K1N 6P8 Ottawa, Ontario Prepared
More informationStationary Noise Feasibility Assessment. 315 Chapel Street Ottawa, Ontario
Stationary Noise Feasibility Assessment 315 Chapel Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17 002 Stationary Noise Prepared For: Leanne Moussa Allsaints 10 Blackburn Avenue K1N 6P8 Ottawa, Ontario Prepared By:
More informationStationary Noise Feasibility Study. The Shops of Tenth Line. Ottawa, Ontario
Stationary Noise Feasibility Study The Shops of Tenth Line Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE13-040 Stationary Noise Prepared For: Jeff Parks 225 Metcalfe Street Ottawa, Ontario K2P 1P9 Prepared By: Thomas Couper,
More informationPlace Vanier Édifice AEFO
Place Vanier Édifice AEFO Martineau Architecture Inc. + Smith Carter Architects & Engineers Inc. TRAFFIC NOISE ASSESSMENT 250 Montreal Road Gradient Microclimate Engineering Inc. Prepared by Thomas Couper,
More informationRoadway Traffic Noise Assessment Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario
Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment 807-825 Montreal Road Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-086-TRAFFIC NOISE Prepared For: Anthony Nicolini 183 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 0M3 Prepared By: Michael
More informationTraffic Noise Assessment. 5 Orchard Drive. Stittsville, Ontario
Traffic Noise Assessment 5 Orchard Drive Stittsville, Ontario REPORT: GWE18-014 - Traffic Noise Prepared For: Cody Campanale 1187 Bank Street, Suite 200 Ottawa, Ontario K1S 3X7 Prepared By: Joshua Foster,
More informationEnvironmental Noise Assessment Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario
Environmental Noise Assessment 1795 Montreal Road Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE18-037 Environmental Noise Prepared For: Samantha Schneider Christopher Simmonds Architect Inc. 45 Eccles Street, The Annex
More informationRoadway Traffic Noise Assessment Chapel Street. Ottawa, Ontario
Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment 151-153 Chapel Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE14-064 Noise Prepared For: Brad Caco Sun Life Financial Center, East Tower 3250 Bloor Street West, Suite 1000 Toronto,
More informationTraffic Noise Assessment Baseline Road Ottawa, Ontario
Traffic Noise Assessment 2140 Baseline Road Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE18-047 Traffic Noise Prepared For: Joey Theberge 905 Lady Ellen Place Ottawa, Ontario K1Z 5L5 Canada Prepared By: Omar Daher, B.Eng.,
More informationNoise Assessment & Control Transportation Noise Assessment 303 Lebreton Street South, 460 St. Laurent Boulevard Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa, Ontario
Noise Assessment & Control Transportation Noise Assessment 303 Lebreton Street South, 460 St. Laurent Boulevard Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GmE 13-051 - Traffic Noise - Final Prepared For:
More informationRoadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Ironwood Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario
Ironwood Subdivision Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE16-085 - Traffic Noise Prepared For: 2356349 Ontario Inc. 301 Moodie Drive, Suite 100 Ottawa, Ontario K2H 9C4 Prepared By: Joshua Foster, P.Eng., Partner
More informationNoise Assessment Report
Noise Assessment Report 19 & 23 Bachman Terrace Prepared for: Tega Homes Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. March 24, 2014 Draft Mar 7 2014 Final Mar 24, 2014 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Table of Contents
More informationRoadway Traffic Noise and Vibration Assessment. The Bridge Wesleyan Church Addition. Ottawa, Ontario
Roadway Traffic Noise and Vibration Assessment The Bridge Wesleyan Church Addition Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE14-103 Traffic Noise and Vibration Prepared For: Alan McCafferty The Bridge Kanata Wesleyan
More informationAppendix K. Environmental Noise Assessment
Appendix K Environmental Noise Assessment ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT THORNTON ROAD NORTH TAUNTON ROAD WEST TO WINCHESTER ROAD WEST SCEDULE 'C' MUNICIPAL CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF OSHAWA
More informationTraffic Noise Assessment. 333 Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario
Traffic Noise Assessment 333 Montreal Road Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-045 - Traffic Noise Prepared For: Michaela Jones The Salvation Army 2 Overlea Blvd Toronto, ON M4H 1P4 Prepared By: Joshua Foster,
More informationNoise Assessment Report Riverside Drive Phase I
Noise Assessment Report - 2887 Riverside Drive Phase I Project # 160401333 Prepared for: Youth Services Bureau Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. Introduction Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1
More informationENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD BETWEEN POPLAR AVENUE AND MAPLE AVENUE TOWN OF AJAX PREPARED FOR: TMIG February 2017 Y1610 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationTransportation Noise & Vibration Assessment Scott Street. Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise & Vibration Assessment 1946 Scott Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17 136 Noise & Vibration Prepared For: Michael Martin Construction Manager 88 Spadina Avenue Ottawa, ON K1Y 2C1
More informationNoise Control Study. for. Avalon Public School Portobello Boulevard at Stormwind Avenue in Ottawa, Ontario. Revision 1
REP N45 Avalon School Traffic Noise Study - R1 Noise Control Study for Avalon Public School Portobello Boulevard at Stormwind Avenue in Ottawa, Ontario. Revision 1 Prepared for: N45 Architecture Inc. Prepared
More informationGuelph Curling Club Development Traffic Noise Impact Study
Guelph Curling Club Development Traffic Noise Impact Study Development Location Prepared For: Guelph Curling Club Paradigm Transportation Solutions Ltd. 43 Forest Road Cambridge ON N1S 3B4 pgrubb@ptsl.com
More informationTable of Contents. 174 Forward Avenue SACL Project #B7-170 Feb 22, Page ii
Page ii Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Noise Assessment Criteria... 1 2.1. Surface Transportation Noise Assessment Criteria... 1 2.2. Neighbouring Stationary Source Noise Assessment Criteria...
More informationNoise Feasibility Study EMGO (North Oakville I) Ltd., Town of Oakville, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study EMGO (North Oakville I) Ltd., Town of Oakville, Ontario For Emgo (North Oakville I) Ltd. 2173 Turnberry Road Burlington, ON L7M 4P8 Prepared by Victor Garcia, BASc Reviewed by Sheeba
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed Hospice 2050 University Avenue East, Waterloo, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Hospice 2050 University Avenue East, Waterloo, Ontario Prepared for: Hospice of Waterloo Region 298 Lawrence Avenue Kitchener, ON N2M 1Y4 Prepared by Sheeba Paul, MEng,
More informationNoise Feasibility Study, McGibbon Condominium 71 Main Street South Georgetown, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study, McGibbon Condominium 71 Main Street South Georgetown, Ontario Prepared for: Attn: Don Jackson Silvercreek Commercial Builders Inc. 66 Mill Street Georgetown, Ontario L5C 1V8 Prepared
More informationREP Fotenn Bank Phase 1 Feasibility Noise Study with Building Component AmendmentPage 1 of 21
REP Fotenn 890-900 Bank Phase 1 Feasibility Noise Study with Building Component AmendmentPage 1 of 21 2018-02-28 Emilie Coyle, M.Pl Planner Fotenn Planning + Design 223 McLeod St, Ottawa, ON K2P 0Z8 Office:
More informationDCR Phoenix. Type of Document 1st Submission. Project Name 256 Rideau Street Ottawa, Ontario. Project Number OTT A0. Prepared By: Nicole Ruyf
DCR Phoenix Noise Impact Assessment Study Type of Document 1st Submission Project Name 256 Rideau Street Ottawa, Ontario Project Number OTT-00206641-A0 Prepared By: Nicole Ruyf Reviewed By: Alam Ansari,
More informationNoise Assessment Report Main Street, Residential Site Cambridge, ON
Noise Assessment Report 825-875 Main Street, Residential Site Cambridge, ON Prepared for: 2536546 Ontario Inc. Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 100-300 Hagey Boulevard Waterloo, ON N2L 0A4 Project:
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber House 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber ouse 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario Prepared for: City Park (Old Barber) omes Inc. 950 Nashville Road Kleinburg,
More informationFayez & Patrizia Ghadban
Noise Impact Assessment Study 826 Pinecrest Road Type of Document Site Plan Submission Project Name 826 Pinecrest Road, Ottawa Project Number Prepared By: 100-2650 Queensview Drive Ottawa, ON K2B 8H6 Canada
More informationStationary Noise Study. Stonebridge Golf and Country Club. Ottawa, Ontario
Stationary Noise Study Stonebridge Golf and Country Club Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GmE 09-042 Noise Prepared For: Kris Haynes 3584 Jockvale Road Ottawa, Ontario K2C 3H2 Prepared By: Thomas Couper, B.Eng.,
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES
TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... NOISE CRITERIA... Transportation Noise Sources... NOISE SOURCES... Transportation Sources... Stationary Noise Sources... PROJECTED SOUND LEVELS... VENTILATION AND WARNING
More informationNOISE CONTROL STUDY FOR PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND...
NOISE CONTROL STUDY PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 NOISE CONTROL STUDY FOR PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...
More informationTable of Contents... ii 1. Introduction... 1
316 Somerset Street East SACL Project #SW18098 April 05, 2018 Page ii Table of Contents Table of Contents... ii 1. Introduction... 1 2. Noise Sources... 1 3. Noise Assessment Criteria... 1 3.1 Surface
More informationAttachment A: Background Noise Assessment for Brandon Thermal Generating Station
1.0 INTRODUCTION SENES Consultants Limited (SENES) was retained by Manitoba Hydro to measure background noise levels at receptor locations in the vicinity of their Brandon Generating Station in Brandon,
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Building 103 Dundas Street West Oakville, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Building 103 Dundas Street West Oakville, Ontario Prepared for: 103 Dundas Corporation Attn: Zaki Wahbeh 2184 Providence Road Oakville, ON L6H 6Z2 Prepared
More informationNOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT RIVERSIDE SOUTH PHASE 9-4 CITY OF OTTAWA
NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT RIVERSIDE SOUTH PHASE 9-4 CITY OF OTTAWA November 2013 Prepared for: RIVERSIDE SOUTH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 2193 Arch Street Ottawa, Ontario K1G 2H5 Prepared by: J.L. RICHARDS
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development, 361 Tanbark Road Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development, 361 Tanbark Road Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario Prepared for: Blythwood Homes Inc. 7058 Ridgewood Crescent Niagara Falls, Ontario L2J 3H1 Prepared
More informationNoise Assessment Report
Noise Assessment Report 19 & 23 Bachman Terrace Prepared for: Tega Homes Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. June 5, 2015 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF
More informationNoise Control Feasibility Study 173 / 175 / 177 Preston Street Ottawa, Ontario
Noise Control Feasibility Study 173 / 175 / 177 Preston Street Ottawa, Ontario Type of Document Site Plan Application Client 1536 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2C 1P1 Project Number Prepared
More informationNoise Assessment Report
Noise Assessment Report 176 Greenfield Avenue Prepared for: TC United Group Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. February 8, 2016 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Introduction February 8, 2016 Table of Contents
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Brock Road Pickering, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Brock Road Pickering, Ontario Prepared for: Madison Brock Limited 369 Rimrock Road Toronto, Ontario M3J 3G2 Prepared by: Jingyi Guo Reviewed by:
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Stacked Townhouse Development Glenashton Drive (Block 55) Oakville, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Stacked Townhouse Development Glenashton Drive (Block 55) Oakville, Ontario Prepared for: Nathan Jamieson, P.Eng Senior Principal, Community Development Stantec Consulting Ltd 300W
More informationMann Avenue Development 87 Mann Avenue Noise Control Study
Mann Avenue Development 87 Mann Avenue Noise Control Study Prepared By: NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 August 13, 2013 Novatech File:
More informationNOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 47 HAVELOCK STREET OTTAWA, ON. REVISED with ADDENDUM for ROOFTOP OUTDOOR LIVING AREA
NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 47 HAVELOCK STREET OTTAWA, ON. REVISED with ADDENDUM for ROOFTOP OUTDOOR LIVING AREA REPORT PREPARED FOR SURFACE DEVELOPMENTS 61 FOREST HILL AVE. OTTAWA,
More informationNOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 12 HAMILTON AVENUE NORTH OTTAWA, ON.
NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 12 HAMILTON AVENUE NORTH OTTAWA, ON. REPORT PREPARED FOR SURFACE DEVELOPMENTS 61 FOREST HILL AVE. OTTAWA, ON, K2C 1P7 September 15, 2016 16419 1 NOISE IMPACT
More informationTri-County Aggregates Ltd. 92 Kenhar Drive North York, Ontario, Canada M9L 1N2
20 October 2016 Tri-County Aggregates Ltd. 92 Kenhar Drive North York, Ontario, Canada M9L 1N2 Attn: CC: Re: Mr. Larry Pevato, Tri-County Aggregates Mr. Bob Long, Long Environmental Noise Impact Study
More informationASSESSMENT OF THE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS AT THE PROPOSED HOLIDAY INN DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE
Ottawa, Ontario ASSESSMENT OF THE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS AT THE PROPOSED HOLIDAY INN DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA Prepared for Prepared by Hugh Williamson Associates Inc.
More informationDETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY OF PROPOSED PHASE 2 CONDOMINIUMS AT 655 & 755 ANAND PRIVATE OTTAWA Ontario Inc.
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada DETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY OF PROPOSED PHASE 2 CONDOMINIUMS AT 655 & 755 ANAND PRIVATE OTTAWA Prepared for Prepared by Hugh Williamson Associates Inc. 13 August 2015 Postal Address:
More informationTRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT 20 MARK AVENUE
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT 20 MARK AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA Prepared for Prepared by Freefield Ltd. Issued: Postal Address:
More informationASSESSMENT OF THE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS AT THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 364 ST. PATRICK STREET
Ottawa, Ontario ASSESSMENT OF THE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS AT THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 364 ST. PATRICK STREET CITY OF OTTAWA Prepared for Prepared by Hugh Williamson Associates Inc. 7 th May 2013
More information671 Victoria Road North City of Guelph Traffic Noise Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited
671 Victoria Road North City of Guelph Traffic Noise Study Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited February 2016 Project Summary Project Number 152315 February 2016 Client 1830334 Ontario Limited Client
More informationENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT STONEPAY - PICKERING WEST OF BROCK ROAD AND SOUTH OF DERSAN STREET PART OF LOTS 19 AND 20, CONCESSION 3 PLAN 40R-28764 CITY OF PICKERING PREPARED FOR: STONEPAY 7603860 CANADA
More informationBrigil Homes. Noise Impact Assessment. Type of Document Site Plan Submission. Project Name Petrie s Landing, Phase 2. Project Number OTT A0
Brigil Homes Noise Impact Assessment Type of Document Site Plan Submission Project Name Petrie s Landing, Phase 2 Project Number Prepared By: exp Services Inc. 100-2650 Queensview Drive Ottawa, ON K2B
More informationACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED PLANTAGENET ASPHALT PLANT
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED PLANTAGENET ASPHALT PLANT Township of Alfred & Plantagenet County of Prescott & Russell Prepared for P. B. Paving and Landscaping 3083, Old Highway
More informationNoise Feasibility Study 2120 Hurontario Street and Grange Drive City of Mississauga, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study 2120 Hurontario Street and Grange Drive City of Mississauga, Ontario For Gordon Woods Developments Limited c/o Edenshaw development Limited 260 Brunel Road Mississuaga, Ontairo
More informationUAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD
UAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD 23 Waterford Drive Telephone (613) 225-6362 Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Facsimile (613) 225-3022 K2E 7V4 e-mail standen.ual@sympatico.ca website: http://www.urban-noise.ca 1.0 Background
More informationAvalon Encore Stage Tenth Line Road Infusion Terrace, Block 233 City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Impact Assessment
Avalon Encore Stage 6 2336 Tenth Line Road Infusion Terrace, Block 233 City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Impact Assessment Prepared For: Minto Communities Inc. Prepared By: Robinson Land Development Our
More informationProposed Residential/Institutional Development Independent and Assisted Care Senior s Residence 190 Richmond Road Ottawa, ON K1Z 6W6
PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE REPORT Project:. Proposed Residential/Institutional Development Independent and Assisted Care Senior s Residence Richmond Road Ottawa, ON KZ W Prepared for: Choice Properties
More informationEnvironmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 92 Plains Road East
Environmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 92 Plains Road East Novus Reference No. 16-0006 Version No. 1.1 (Final) February 26, 2016 NOVUS PROJECT TEAM: Specialist: Marcus Li, P.Eng. 16/02/26
More informationACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ON THE PROPOSED AVALON CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Ottawa Ontario Canada ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ON THE PROPOSED AVALON CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CITY OF OTTAWA Prepared for Bryden Martel Architects Inc. Prepared by Hugh Williamson
More informationPrepared for: Gapatas Inc Sherwoodtowne Boulevard, Unit 106 Mississauga, ON L4Z 1Y5. Our File No:
YARMOUTH HEIGHTS ESTATES PHASE IV PARTS 1,2,4,5 & 6 Plan 11R Being Part of Lot 9 Concession 8 Geographical Township of Yarmouth City of St. Thomas Prepared for: Gapatas Inc. 4255 Sherwoodtowne Boulevard,
More informationENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE BLOCKS 273 LIBERTY STREET BLOCKS 197 to 199, INCLUDSIVE REGISTERED PLAN 40M-2332 AND PART OF LOT 10, CONCESSION 2 MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON (BOWMANVILLE)
More informationNOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 47 HAVELOCK STREET OTTAWA, ON.
NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 47 HAVELOCK STREET OTTAWA, ON. REPORT PREPARED FOR SURFACE DEVELOPMENTS 61 FOREST HILL AVE. OTTAWA, ON, K2C 1P7 March 25, 2015 15078 1 NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed 4 Storey Apartment Building 226 Woolwich Street South Breslau, Regional Municipality of Waterloo
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed 4 Storey Apartment Building 226 Woolwich Street South Breslau, Regional Municipality of Waterloo Prepared for: RHH Rental Properties Inc. 6783 Wellington Road 34, RR22
More informationNoise Feasibility Study 2480 Old Bronte Road, Oakville, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study 2480 Old Bronte Road, Oakville, Ontario Prepared for: New Horizon Development Group (Bronte) Inc. 69 John Street South, Suite 400 Hamilton, Ontario L8N 2B9 Prepared by Sheeba Paul,
More informationTransportation Noise & Vibration Assessment. Medical Council of Canada. Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise & Vibration Assessment Medical Council of Canada Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE13-115 - Traffic Noise & Vibrations Prepared For: Derek Hardy 47 Clarence Street Ottawa, Ontario K1N 9K1
More information3.5.1 Outdoor Living Areas (OLAs) Indoor Sound Levels... 8
RWDI was retained by Manor Park Management to conduct a traffic noise feasibility study as part of the Site Plan Approval (SPA) for the proposed development, to be located at the northwest corner of Vanier
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Framgard Apartments (South Block) NW corner of Britannia Road and Regional Road 25 Town of Milton, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Framgard Apartments (South Block) NW corner of Britannia Road and Regional Road 25 Town of Milton, Ontario Prepared for: Mattamy Homes Ltd. 433 Steeles Avenue East, Suite 110 Milton,
More informationSS WILSON ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers
SS WILSON ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers REPORT NO. WA10-089 DETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY PROPOSED 6-STOREY APARTMENT BUILDING 17, 19 & 23 ROBINSON AVENUE OTTAWA, ONTARIO SUBMITTED TO: ROBINSON PARK DEVELOPMENT
More informationR. BOUWMEESTER & ASSOCIATES
R. BOUWMEESTER & ASSOCIATES Land Development Engineering 165 Browning Trail Barrie, Ontario, Canada L4N 5E7 tel/fax (705) 726-3392 rbouwmeester@rogers.com Development Engineering Environmental Noise Studies
More information18 McArthur Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario Proposed Development Noise Study Report. Prepared for: Takyan Consulting By: ARCH-Nova Design Inc.
18 McArthur Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario Proposed Development Noise Study Report Prepared for: Takyan Consulting By: ARCH-Nova Design Inc. Project # N-01-16 May 2016 18 McArthur Avenue - 1 - N-01-16 TABLE OF
More informationNOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY
NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY Development Address: 765 Montreal Road Ottawa, Ontario City of Ottawa File Number: D07-12-18-0059 Client: Shepherds of Good Hope c/o: CSV Architects 402-1066 Somerset Street
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed Stacked Townhouse Development, 3060 and 3072 Sixth Line, Town of Oakville, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Stacked Townhouse Development, 3060 and 3072 Sixth Line, Town of Oakville, Ontario Prepared for: 2457667 Ontario Inc. 3219 Yonge Street, Suite 365 Toronto, Ontario M4N
More informationENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT 2055 BROCK ROAD PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT PART OF LOT 18, CONCESSION 2 CITY OF PICKERING PREPARED FOR: BROCK ROAD DUFFINS FOREST INC. Revised October 2017 December 2014
More informationNoise Feasibility Study, Proposed Hotel Development, Living Waters Resort Collingwood, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Hotel Development, Living Waters Resort Collingwood, Ontario Prepared for: Law Cranberry Resort Limited 85 Scarsdale Road, Suite 306 Toronto, Ontario M3R 2R2 Prepared
More informationNoise Control Study. Proposed Mixed-use Development. 112 Montreal Road City of Ottawa. Prepared for: DCR Phoenix Developments
Noise Control Study Proposed Mixed-use Development 112 Montreal Road City of Ottawa Prepared for: DCR Phoenix Developments August 2014 10-13081-001-N01 August 28, 2014 10-13081-001-N01 Michael Boucher
More informationENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT 3171 LAKESHORE ROAD WEST PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PART OF LOT 32, CONCESSION 4 SOUTH OF DUNDAS STREET AND BLOCK 79 REGISTERED PLAN M-257 TOWN OF OAKVILLE PREPARED
More informationNOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT RIVERSIDE SOUTH PHASE 13 CITY OF OTTAWA
NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT RIVERSIDE SOUTH PHASE 13 CITY OF OTTAWA February 2014 (Revised October 2014) (Revised December 2015) Prepared for: RIVERSIDE SOUTH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 2193 Arch Street Ottawa,
More informationNOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY. MINTO COMMUNITIES INC. Clarke Lands CITY OF OTTAWA
NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY MINTO COMMUNITIES INC. Clarke Lands CITY OF OTTAWA March 2016 Prepared for: Minto Communities Inc. 200-180 Kent Street Ottawa, Ontario K1P 0B6 Prepared by: J.L. RICHARDS
More informationEnvironmental Noise Assessment 1020, 1024, 1028, 1032 & 1042 Sixth Line Oakville, ON
Environmental Noise Assessment 1020, 1024, 1028, 1032 & 1042 Sixth Line Oakville, ON Novus Reference No. 16-0173 Version No. 1.0 (Final) September 30, 2016 NOVUS PROJECT TEAM: Specialist: Marcus Li, P.Eng.
More information23, 33 & 39 DEERFOX DRIVE NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY
23, 33 & 39 DEERFOX DRIVE NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY Prepared for: Glenview Homes (Deerfox) Ltd. 190 O Connor Street, 11 th Floor Ottawa, Ontario K2P 2R3 Prepared By: NOVATECH Suite 200, 240 Michael
More informationASSESSMENT OF HVAC NOISE IMPACTS FROM HALF MOON BAY CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada ASSESSMENT OF HVAC NOISE IMPACTS FROM HALF MOON BAY CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Prepared for Prepared by Hugh Williamson Associates Inc. Postal Address: PO Box 74056, RPO Beechwood,
More information1. Introduction Site Noise Impact... 1
Mixed Use Development SACL Report #B4-077 April 11, 2014 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Site... 1 3. Noise Impact... 1 3.1. Noise Sources... 1 3.2. Critical Noise Receptors... 1 3.3. Noise Levels...
More informationMINTO COMMUNITIES INC GREENBANK ROAD NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY
MINTO COMMUNITIES INC. 3311 GREENBANK ROAD NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY June 2017 Prepared for: MINTO COMMUNITIES INC. 180 Kent Street, Suite 200 Ottawa, Ontario K1P 0B6 Prepared by: J.L. RICHARDS &
More informationAPPENDIX D EXISTING ROADWAY NOISE, AIR QUALITY AND GROUND VIBRATION ANALYSIS
APPENDIX D EXISTING ROADWAY NOISE, AIR QUALITY AND GROUND VIBRATION ANALYSIS West Transitway Extension Project Holly Acres Road to Moodie Drive Environmental Noise, Air Quality & Ground Vibrations Existing
More informationAppendix M. Noise Assessment
Appendix M Noise Assessment 610 Chartwell Road, Suite 300 Oakville, ON Canada L6J 4A5 t: 905.823.8500 f: 905.823.8503 www.mmmgrouplimited.com www.wspgroup.ca MEMO RE: FROM: DATE: March 27, 2017 COPIES:
More informationNOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6
RESIDENTIAL / HOTEL DEVELOPMENT 141 GEORGE STREET / 325 DALHOUSIE STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO Prepared By: NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6
More informationThe anticipated critical noise receptors and their locations are identified as follows and are shown on Figure 3:
177 Cross Ave. B2-065 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION This document is a Noise and Vibration Impact Study regarding the proposed mixed use development at 177 Cross Avenue, Oakville. It is associated with rezoning application
More informationMerivale Road Residential Development 1683 Merivale Road Noise Control Study
Merivale Road Residential Development 1683 Merivale Road Noise Control Study Prepared By: NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 Submitted:
More informationPolicy for the Assessment and Mitigation of Traffic Noise on County Roads
Lanark County Policy for the Assessment and Mitigation of Traffic Noise on County Roads d r a f t f o r d i s c u s s i o n Prepared by: AECOM Canada Ltd. 302 1150 Morrison Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada K2H
More informationDRAFT REPORT. Boyne East Catholic Secondary School #3CSS. Noise Impact Study. Louis St. Laurent Avenue, Milton. SACL #SW18060A0 December 11, 2018
DRAFT REPORT Boyne East Catholic Secondary School #3CSS Louis St. Laurent Avenue, Milton Noise Impact Study SACL #SW18060A0 Submitted to: Jeff Kenny Partner Strategy 4 Inc. 2620 Bristol Circle, Unit 100
More informationRoad and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario
Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario Prepared for: Attn: Nancy Shoemaker Black, Shoemaker, Robinson & Donaldson Limited 351 Speedvale Ave. West Guelph,
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Kemsley Farm St. Thomas, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Kemsley Farm St. Thomas, Ontario Prepared for: Doug Tarry Limited 358 Elm Street St. Thomas, Ontario, N5R 1K1 Prepared by Victor Garcia, PEng Reviewed
More informationREP Atelier 292 OCH Phase 2 Noise Study Page 1 of 26
REP Atelier 292 OCH Phase 2 Noise Study Page 1 of 26 2016-10-13 Robert Matta Project Manager Atelier 292 Architect Inc. 292 Main Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 1E1 Tel: +1 (613) 231-2245 x154 Fax: +1 (613)
More informationExecutive Summary. An inspection of the GCP windows indicates that the operable window seals and operable window closure mechanism should be upgraded.
Global Centre for Pluralism Page 2 of 11 Environmental Noise Study 14 March 2014 Executive Summary KPMB Architects and Imara Sussex Drive Limited have retained the services of Aercoustics Engineering Limited
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed 6-storey Seniors Condominium 7480 Derry Road West Milton, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed 6-srey Seniors Condominium 7480 Derry Road West Miln, Ontario Prepared for: FGL Derry Inc. 5400 Yonge Street, Suite 300 Toron, Ontario M2N 5R5 Prepared by Vicr Garcia,
More informationBurnett Lands Greenbank Road. Noise Impact Feasibility Report
Burnett Lands - 3370 Greenbank Road Noise Impact Feasibility Report BURNETT LANDS 3370 GREENBANK ROAD NOISE IMPACT FEASIBILITY REPORT Prepared for: Claridge Homes Prepared By: NOVATECH Suite 200, 240 Michael
More informationNoise and Vibration Feasibility Study 1 and 15 Stevenson St & 8 William St Guelph, Ontario
Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study 1 and 15 Stevenson St & 8 William St Guelph, Ontario Prepared for: Jennark Homes 66 Wellington Road 7, Unit #1 Elora, Ontario N0B 1S0 Prepared by Rajjot Arora, BASc
More information