Midsouth Entomologist 10: 1-13 ISSN:
|
|
- Anabel Simpson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Midsouth Entomologist : -3 ISSN: Report 26 Soybean Insect Losses in the Southern US Musser, F. R.*, A. L. Catchot, Jr., J. A. Davis 2, G. M. Lorenz 3, T. Reed 4, D. D. Reisig 5, S. D. Stewart 6 and S. Taylor 7 Mississippi State University, Department of Biochem., Mol. Biol., Entomol. and Plant Pathol., Box 9775, Mississippi State, MS Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Department of Entomology, 44 Life Sciences Building, Baton Rouge, LA University of Arkansas CES, Lonoke Extension Center, 2 Highway 7 East, Lonoke, AR Alabama CES, Tennessee Valley REC, 9494 Experimental Loop, Madison, AL North Carolina State University, The Vernon James REC, 27 Research Station Rd., Plymouth, NC The University of Tennessee, WTREC, 65 Airways Blvd., Jackson, TN Virginia Tech, Tidewater Agricultural REC, 632 Holland Rd., Suffolk, VA *corresponding author fm6@msstate.edu Received: 7-II-27 Accepted: 7-II-27 Abstract Estimated soybean insect costs and losses experienced during 26 were collected and compiled following the 26 growing season to provide a record of insect pressure and management practices for the year. This survey has been done annually in all participating states since at least 2, with Mississippi having data back to 24. The 26 survey represents.8 million soybean across the southern United States. Overall, corn earworm was the most expensive pest in soybean followed closely by soybean looper and stink bugs. Total insect management costs rose slightly to $26.3 per acre during 26. Estimated crop losses to insects also increased to $2.83, making the total cost + losses for 26 reach $46.86, more than $6 greater than the record low estimated costs + losses in 25. The average number of insecticide applications per crop ranged from.6 in Virginia to 3.2 in Louisiana, while estimated crop loss ranged from.7% in Virginia to 6.9% in North Carolina. Key Words: soybean, yield loss, pest management Introduction Soybean losses have been compiled annually since 24 in Mississippi (MS) (Musser and Catchot 28), 28 in Tennessee (TN) (Musser et al. 29), 29 in Arkansas (AR) (Musser et al. 2), and 2 in Alabama (AL), Louisiana (LA), North Carolina (NC) and Virginia (VA) (Musser et al. 22). These surveybased losses provide an annual record of insect pressure and management decisions. While the costs and losses estimated for a pest in any given year are somewhat subjective, these losses provide an historical record of pest pressure and management practices and provide an estimate of the economic
2 Midsouth Entomologist 2 impact of the various soybean pests. Over time, the changes in estimated losses and insecticide applications provide a reliable record of shifts in pest spectrums and grower management. Materials and Methods An informal telephone or written survey was conducted with numerous crop consultants and extension personnel in the fall of the year. Surveyed people were those who actively scouted soybean fields and those who assisted growers in making soybean pest management decisions. These surveys were compiled and then combined with the author s own experience to estimate the various fields in the table. Acreage, yield and price data were drawn from Agricultural Statistics Service publications (USDA NASS) before final estimates were published, so values in the tables may differ from final NASS values. The estimates were placed in a spreadsheet to make the various calculations. Actual formulas used in the spreadsheet were published by Musser and Catchot (28). Additional columns were added for the 23 losses and these are defined in Musser et al (24). Results and Discussion Planted acreage was.8 million, which represents 3% of the U.S. soybean acreage. Estimated yield lost to insects returned from a low of 3.5% during 25 to a more typical 4.54% in 26. Similarly, the number of foliar applications rose from.34 to.62 per crop, making the 26 the most sprayed soybean crop since 2 and halting a four-year trend of annually reducing the number of foliar applications in soybean. While overall data suggests 26 had more insect pressure than previous years, this was not experienced uniformly throughout the surveyed states. Alabama and Tennessee had the lowest losses in their states since the survey was begun, while Louisiana had the highest losses recorded in their state. Mississippi and North Carolina had near record high losses while Virginia was near its record low. As in previous years, adoption of seed treatments and scouting as insect management strategies varied widely across the region, Virginia had scouts in few of their soybean (2%) and rarely used an insecticide seed treatment (%), while Louisiana has 9% of its scouted and seed treatments were widely used (95%). This difference in behavior is logical based on higher insect pressure in the more southern states. Louisiana growers sprayed frequently (3.22 times per crop) and still experienced >4% yield loss while Virginia growers only made.6 insecticide applications per crop and had yield losses from insects of <%. (Table ). Corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), was the most expensive insect pest of soybean overall during 26 in terms of lost yield and control costs. Stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), the most expensive pest during 25, slipped to the third most costly pest behind corn earworm and soybean looper, Chrysodeixis includens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). These three pests are generally the three most costly pests in the southern U.S. As has been true every year, the primary stink bug species overall was green stink bug (Acrosternum hilare). However, the redbanded stink bug, Piezodorus guildinii, comprised more than 5% of the overall complex for the first time during 26, and it made up more than 25% of the stink bug complex in Mississippi and Louisiana. State Highlights Alabama. Insect pressure was light. Soybean looper was the primary pest, costing growers $3. per acre, and was the only pest costing more than $.5. Arkansas. Corn earworm was the most costly insect, responsible for 4% of all insect costs + losses. Stink bugs, bean leaf beetle, soybean looper and armyworms all caused similar levels of loss, together responsible for an additional 56% of the total losses + costs. Louisiana. Insect pressure was high with both stink bugs and soybean looper sprayed on >7% of acreage, and stink bugs often requiring multiple applications. Redbanded stink bug made up 6% of the stink bug complex, which are more damaging and difficult to control than other stink bug species. Mississippi. Similar to Louisiana, insect pressure from soybean looper and redbanded stink bug was high. In addition, corn earworm and green cloverworm were costly pests during 26.
3 Midsouth Entomologist 3 North Carolina. This state had the highest estimated yield loss from insects among those states surveyed. As in previous years, corn earworm was the primary pest, accounting for 58% of insect costs + losses. Tennessee. The primary use of insecticides (68%) was an automatic application made during reproductive growth with no appreciable quantity of any insects in the field (reported as Other ). Stink bugs were responsible for most of the yield losses. Virginia. A very light insect year with 6% of sprayed with an insecticide, mostly targeting stink bugs and corn earworm. Total insect costs plus losses were estimated at $4.25/acre. The complete data for each state and all states combined are in the appendices following this report. Table. Soybean management and losses in surveyed states, Year % soybeans scouted % soybeans with insect. seed treatment No. foliar insecticide applications % yield loss to insects $ loss + cost/acre Combined States Alabama Arkansas Louisiana Mississippi North Carolina Tennessee Virginia acre =.45 ha
4 Midsouth Entomologist 4 Acknowledgements The authors thank numerous crop consultants and extension service personnel in each state who provided input into these estimates. Without their input, these estimates would not have as much credibility. References Musser, F. R., and A. Catchot. 28. Mississippi soybean insect losses. Midsouth Entomol. : Musser, F. R., S. D. Stewart, and A. L. Catchot, Jr soybean insect losses for Mississippi and Tennessee. Midsouth Entomol. 2: Musser, F. R., G. M. Lorenz, S. D. Stewart, and A. L. Catchot, Jr soybean insect losses for Mississippi, Tennessee, and Arkansas. Midsouth Entomol. 3: Musser, F. R., A. L. Catchot, Jr., J. A. Davis, D. A. Herbert, Jr., B. R. Leonard, G. M. Lorenz, T. Reed, D. D. Reisig, and S. D. Stewart soybean insect losses in the southern US. Midsouth Entomol. 5: -22. Musser, F. R., A. L. Catchot, Jr., J. A. Davis, D. A. Herbert, Jr., G. M. Lorenz, T. Reed, D. D. Reisig, and S. D. Stewart soybean insect losses in the southern US. Midsouth Entomol. 7: USDA NASS. National Agricultural Statistics Service Data and Statistics,
5 Midsouth Entomologist 5 List of Appendices Appendix. Overall soybean insect losses from seven surveyed southern states, 26. Appendix 2. Alabama soybean insect losses, 26. Appendix 3. Arkansas soybean insect losses, 26. Appendix 4. Louisiana soybean insect losses, 26. Appendix 5. Mississippi soybean insect losses, 26. Appendix 6. North Carolina soybean insect losses, 26. Appendix 7. Tennessee soybean insect losses, 26. Appendix 8. Virginia soybean insect losses, 26.
6 Midsouth Entomologist 6 Appendix. Overall soybean insect losses from seven surveyed southern states, 26. above ET Cost of apps per Loss + % Total Cost/acre Loss + Cost Armyw orm complex 4,3, % 879,85 8.% 895,56 8.3%. $ $.6.29%,476,794 $2,9,894 $ % Banded Cucumber Beetle,75, 6.2%.%.%. $..2. $..%,867 $8,33 $..% Bean Leaf Beetle 7,649,74 7.8%,56, 4.4%,758,22 6.3%.7 $ $.57.4% 2,9,7 $36,684,425 $ % Blister Beetle,42,444.6%,5.9%,.9%. $ $.3.% 2 $35,5 $.3.% Corn Earw orm 4,493, %,952,8 8.% 2,258, %.9 $ $2.8.58% 7,969,25 $8,42,543 $ % Cutw orms 456, %,.9% 35,.3%. $ $.2.% 9,336 $286,649 $.3.% Dectes Stem Borer 6,49,74 6.%.% 59,.5%. $ $.2.7% 334,885 $3,54,98 $.32.9% Garden Webw orms 2,63 2.%.% 36,222.3%. $ $.3.% 7,2 $358,53 $.3.% Grape Colaspis 5,555,74 5.4%.%.%. $..7. $..% 8,672 $83,298 $.2.% Grasshopper 5,22, % 4,556.4% 38,5.4%. $ $.2.4% 23,828 $2,344,6 $.22.6% Green Cloverw orm 8,8, 8.6%,355, 2.5%,34,56.5%. $ $.92.22%,23,69 $2,925,824 $ % Kudzu Bug 2,878, % 94,3.8% 37,2 2.8%. $ $.25.3% 32,26 $4,5,49 $.37.% Lesser Cornstalk Borer 5,926.5%.%.%. $ $..% 58,35 $572,86 $.5.% Mexican Bean Beetle 66,667.6%.%.%. $... $..% $ $..% Potato Leafhopper 5,353, %,.9% 29,.3%. $8...3 $.2.% $232,888 $.2.% Saltmarsh Caterpillar 3,397,47 3.5% 23,.% 76,7.7%. $ $.9.3% 32,57 $2,289,59 $.2.6% Soybean Aphid,.% 5.% 5.%. $4... $..% $2, $..% Soybean Looper 6,92, % 2,854,5 26.4% 3,95, %. $ $ % 3,89,56 $86,236,358 $ % Spider Mites 63,63.5% 25.%.%. $..93. $..% 7,2 $69,722 $..% Spotted Cucumber Beetle 7,33, %.%.%. $..38. $..3% 28,542 $,26,87 $.2.3% Stink Bugs (see box below ) 8,94, 82.8% 3,8, 28.5% 3,263, %.38 $ $ % 3,926,94 $77,56,544 $ % Threecornered Alfalfa Hopper 9,85, % 575, 5.3% 47, 3.9%. $ $.28.% 544,97 $8,44,567 $.78 2.% Thrips 9,69, 89.7%.% 4,.%. $5..9. $..% 38,744 $45,343 $.4.% Trochanter Mealybug.%.%.%. $... $..% $ $..% Velvetbean Caterpillar 3,784, %,462, 3.5%,26,.7%.6 $ $.76.8% 887,695 $6,93,786 $ % Other.%.% 79, 7.3%. $ $.22.% $2,37, $.22.6%.62 $ % 22,92,28 $394,64,64 $36.5.% State Combined Total Bushels Harvested 48,23, Total Per Acre Species Year 26 Total Bushels Lost to Insects 22,92,28 Foliar s Costs $69,24,438 $5.67 Brow n 3.5 Total,8, Percent Yield Loss 4.54% Seed Treatment Costs $68,242,662 $6.32 Brow n Marmorated.9 Yield/acre Yield w /o Insects Scouting costs $43,687,5 $4.5 Green 4.9 Price/Bushel $9.82 Ave. # Spray Applications.62 Total Costs $28,7,5 $26.3 Redbanded 6.9 Scouted 6 Seed 6,946,8 Yield Lost to insects $224,923,626 $2.83 Redshouldered.8 Scouting Fee/scouted acre $6.66 Scouted 6,558,7 Total Losses + Costs $56,93,74 $46.86 Southern Green 8. Insect Seed Trt. 64 Total Seed Trt Cost/ ac $9.82
7 Midsouth Entomologist 7 Appendix 2. Alabama soybean insect losses, 26. Cost of apps per Loss + Cost/acre % Total Loss + Cost Armyw orm complex, 2.7% 3, 6.5% 2, 4.3% $ $.37.22% 3,37 $483,66 $.5 6.3% Banded Cucumber Beetle.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Bean Leaf Beetle, 2.7%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Blister Beetle 5,.9%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Corn Earw orm 25, 5.4%,5.3%,.2% $ $.2.% $8,5 $.2.3% Cutw orms 25, 5.4%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Dectes Stem Borer, 2.7%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Garden Webw orms.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Grape Colaspis.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Grasshopper, 2.7% 2,.4%,.2% $ $..4% 6,263 $68,33 $.5 2.3% Green Cloverw orm, 2.7% 5,.% 5,.% $5.5.. $.6.2% 3,32 $58,87 $.3 2.% Kudzu Bug, 2.7% 2,5.5% 2,.4% $ $.4.2% 3,32 $48,37 $..6% Lesser Cornstalk Borer 2, 4.3%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Mexican Bean Beetle.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Potato Leafhopper.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Saltmarsh Caterpillar.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Soybean Aphid.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Soybean Looper 25, 54.3%, 2.7% 9, 9.6% $ $2.5.27% 39,46 $,38,457 $ % Spider Mites.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Spotted Cucumber Beetle 5, 32.6%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Stink Bugs (see box below ) 3, 65.2% 5,.9% 25, 5.4% $ $.46.33% 46,975 $682,249 $ % Threecornered Alfalfa Hopper 2, 43.5% 5,.% 2,.4% $ $..9% 2,527 $25,266 $ % Thrips.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Trochanter Mealybug.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Velvetbean Caterpillar, 2.7% 2, 2.6%, 2.2% $ $.8.2% 3,32 $6,37 $ % Other.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..%.335 $3.3.% 45,622 $2,972,22 $6.46.% State AL Total Bushels Harvested 4,26, Total Per Acre Species Year 26 Total Bushels Lost to Insects 45,622 Foliar s Costs $,56, $3.3 Brow n 5 Total 46, Percent Yield Loss.% Seed Treatment Costs $,6, $3.5 Brow n Marmorated Yield/acre 3 Yield w /o Insects 3.32 Scouting costs $,932, $4.2 Green 9 Price/Bushel $. Ave. # Spray Applications.335 Total Costs $5,58, $. Redbanded 5 Scouted 7 Seed 6, Yield Lost to insects $,456,22 $3.7 Redshouldered Scouting Fee/scouted acre $6. Scouted 322, Total Losses + Costs $6,54,22 $4.6 Southern Green 6 Insect Seed Trt. 35 Total Seed Trt Cost/ ac $.
8 Midsouth Entomologist 8 Appendix 3. Arkansas soybean insect losses, 26. Cost of apps per Loss + % Total Cost/acre Loss + Cost Armyw orm complex 2,75, 87.3% 35,.% 35,.% $5... $.5.87%,375,534 $4,972,73 $ % Banded Cucumber Beetle, 3.2%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Bean Leaf Beetle 3,5,.% 5, 5.9% 65, 2.6%.2 $ $.24.%,575,62 $9,246,46 $6. 5.5% Blister Beetle 3, 9.5%, 3.2%, 3.2% $ $..% $35, $..3% Corn Earw orm 2,2, 69.8% 9, 28.6%,, 3.7%. $ $ % 3,85,496 $49,63,57 $ % Cutw orms, 3.2%.% 2,.6% $3...6 $.2.% $6, $.2.% Dectes Stem Borer,75, 55.6%.% 5,.6% $3...6 $.5.% $5, $.5.% Garden Webw orms, 3.2%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Grape Colaspis 3,5,.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Grasshopper 3,5,.% 2,.6% 2,.6% $5...6 $.3.% 57,56 $,634,646 $.52.3% Green Cloverw orm 3,5,.% 2,.6%.% $3... $..% $ $..% Kudzu Bug,, 3.7% 5.% 2,.% $3... $..% $6, $..% Lesser Cornstalk Borer,.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Mexican Bean Beetle.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Potato Leafhopper 3,5,.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Saltmarsh Caterpillar 2,5, 79.4% 5,.6%.% $... $..% $ $..% Soybean Aphid.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Soybean Looper,75, 55.6% 63, 2.% 7, 22.2% $ $ % 875,34 $5,875,8 $ % Spider Mites.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Spotted Cucumber Beetle 3,5,.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Stink Bugs (see box below ) 3,5,.% 63, 2.% 8, 25.4% $ $.27.%,575,62 $9,346,46 $ % Threecornered Alfalfa Hopper 3,5,.%.% 5,.6% $3...6 $.5.% $5, $.5.% Thrips 3,5,.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Trochanter Mealybug.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Velvetbean Caterpillar 2,, 63.5% 7, 22.2% 7, 22.2%. $ $.73.6%,39 $3,284,378 $.4 2.6% Other.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..%.494 $. 6.4% 9,5,94 $24,4,29 $39.4.% State AR Total Bushels Harvested 48,5, Total Per Acre Species Year 26 Total Bushels Lost to Insects 9,5,94 Foliar s Costs $3,5, $. Brow n 4 Total 3,5, Percent Yield Loss 6.4% Seed Treatment Costs $8,742,5 $5.95 Brow n Marmorated Yield/acre 47 Yield w /o Insects 5.2 Scouting costs $5,435, $4.9 Green 44 Price/Bushel $9.74 Ave. # Spray Applications.494 Total Costs $65,678,5 $2.85 Redbanded Scouted 7 Seed 2,25, Yield Lost to insects $92,639,29 $29.4 Redshouldered Scouting Fee/scouted acre $7. Scouted 2,25, Total Losses + Costs $58,37,529 $5.26 Southern Green 5 Insect Seed Trt. 7 Total Seed Trt Cost/ ac $8.5
9 Midsouth Entomologist 9 Appendix 4. Louisiana soybean insect losses, 26. Cost of apps per Loss + Cost/acre % Total Loss + Cost Armyw orm complex 5, 4.% 2, 6.% 2, 6.% $8...6 $.28.% $,6, $ % Banded Cucumber Beetle,25,.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Bean Leaf Beetle 5,.2%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Blister Beetle 5,.4%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Corn Earw orm 2, 6.%, 8.%, 8.% $ $.2.8% 52,54 $,895,463 $ % Cutw orms 8,.6%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Dectes Stem Borer,, 8.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Garden Webw orms 6,.5%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Grape Colaspis,25,.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Grasshopper 7, 56.% 3,.2%.% $... $..% $ $..% Green Cloverw orm,25,.% 5, 4.% 25, 2.% $ $.6.5% 325,962 $5,96,64 $ % Kudzu Bug, 8.%,.8%,.8% $8...8 $.6.% $8, $.6.% Lesser Cornstalk Borer 5,.4%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Mexican Bean Beetle.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Potato Leafhopper,25,.%, 8.%,.8% $8...8 $.6.% $8, $.6.% Saltmarsh Caterpillar 25, 2.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Soybean Aphid.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Soybean Looper,25,.%,, 8.% 9, 72.% $ $ % 84,96 $23,94,63 $ % Spider Mites,.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Spotted Cucumber Beetle,25,.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Stink Bugs (see box below ),25,.%,25,.%,, 8.% 2 $ $7.6.75%,4,868 $32,838,244 $ % Threecornered Alfalfa Hopper,25,.% 5, 4.% 3, 24.% $ $.92.25% 62,98 $3,948,32 $ % Thrips,25,.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Trochanter Mealybug.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Velvetbean Caterpillar 75, 6.% 5, 4.% 25, 2.% $ $.6.3% 95,577 $3,857,985 $ % Other.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% 3.26 $ % 2,692,448 $73,338,257 $58.67.% State LA Total Bushels Harvested 62,5, Total Per Acre Species Year 26 Total Bushels Lost to Insects 2,692,448 Foliar s Costs $47,76, $38.2 Brow n 29 Total,25, Percent Yield Loss 4.3% Seed Treatment Costs $4,25, $.4 Brow n Marmorated Yield/acre 5 Yield w /o Insects 52.5 Scouting costs $,25, $9. Green Price/Bushel $9.5 Ave. # Spray Applications 3.26 Total Costs $73,26, $58.6 Redbanded 6 Scouted 9 Seed,87,5 Yield Lost to insects $25,578,257 $2.46 Redshouldered Scouting Fee/scouted acre $. Scouted,25, Total Losses + Costs $98,838,257 $79.7 Southern Green Insect Seed Trt. 95 Total Seed Trt Cost/ ac $2.
10 Midsouth Entomologist Appendix 5. Mississippi soybean insect losses, 26. Cost of apps per Loss + % Total Cost/acre Loss + Cost Armyw orm complex 5, 24.4% 3, 4.6% 35, 7.% $ $.54.% 5,98 $4,82,63 $ % Banded Cucumber Beetle 4, 9.5%.%.% $9... $..% 2,2 $2,64 $..% Bean Leaf Beetle,8, 87.8% 65, 3.7% 75, 36.6%.2 $ $4.83.8% 89,76 $,757,73 $5.74.% Blister Beetle 25,.2%.%.% $... $..% 3 $29 $..% Corn Earw orm 6, 29.3% 35, 7.% 4, 9.5%. $ $3.54.2%,3,529 $8,96,659 $ % Cutw orms 2, 9.8%, 4.9% 5,.7% $9...7 $.7.%,5 $238,26 $.2.2% Dectes Stem Borer,6, 78.%.%.% $..2. $..6% 68,57 $,65,3 $.8.4% Garden Webw orms, 4.9%.%.% $..5. $..% 7,882 $77,45 $.4.% Grape Colaspis 4, 9.5%.%.% $9... $..2% 2,2 $26,43 $..2% Grasshopper,, 48.8%,.5% 2,5.6% $8...6 $.5.5% 52,549 $66,3 $.3.5% Green Cloverw orm,75, 85.4% 8, 39.% 85, 4.5% $ $3.73.6% 643,725 $3,97,384 $ % Kudzu Bug,2, 58.5% 5, 7.3% 25, 2.2% $ $..% $2,25, $..9% Lesser Cornstalk Borer 25,.2%.%.% $. 5.. $..6% 65,686 $645,39 $.3.6% Mexican Bean Beetle.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Potato Leafhopper 5, 24.4%.%,.% $8... $..% $8, $..% Saltmarsh Caterpillar 55, 26.8% 7, 3.4% 75, 3.7% $ $.48.3% 44,5 $2,394,86 $.7 2.% Soybean Aphid.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Soybean Looper,7, 82.9% 9, 43.9%,2, 58.5% $ $ %,34, $32,358,8 $ % Spider Mites 25, 6.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Spotted Cucumber Beetle,9, 92.7%.%.% $9... $..9% 99,843 $98,46 $.48.8% Stink Bugs (see box below ),5, 73.2% 75, 36.6% 85, 4.5%.3 $ $5.2.55% 59,76 $6,32,853 $ % Threecornered Alfalfa Hopper 2,, 97.6%,.5% 25,.2% $ $..%,5 $35,76 $.5.3% Thrips 2,, 97.6%.%.% $8.5.. $..% $ $..% Trochanter Mealybug.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Velvetbean Caterpillar 85, 4.5% 25, 2.2% 3, 4.6% $ $.76.62% 67, $,79,4 $ % Other.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% $ % 5,225,488 $6,252,287 $56.7.% State MS Total Bushels Harvested 2,5, Total Per Acre Species Year 26 Total Bushels Lost to Insects 5,225,488 Foliar s Costs $64,938, $3.68 Brow n 3 Total 2,5, Percent Yield Loss 4.85% Seed Treatment Costs $9,68, $9.6 Brow n Marmorated Yield/acre 5 Yield w /o Insects Scouting costs $,98,7 $5.8 Green 3 Price/Bushel $9.82 Ave. # Spray Applications Total Costs $96,536,7 $47.9 Redbanded 29 Scouted 9 Seed,64, Yield Lost to insects $5,34,287 $25.3 Redshouldered Scouting Fee/scouted acre $6.46 Scouted,845, Total Losses + Costs $47,85,987 $72.2 Southern Green Insect Seed Trt. 8 Total Seed Trt Cost/ ac $2.
11 Midsouth Entomologist Appendix 6. North Carolina soybean insect losses, 26. Cost of apps per Loss + Cost/acre % Total Loss + Cost Armyw orm complex 83,333 5.% 25,85.5% 9,56.6% $..5.6 $.6.3% 6,8 $25,642 $.5.4% Banded Cucumber Beetle.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Bean Leaf Beetle 924, % 3, 8.4% 248,22 5.2% $ $.22.28% 78,622 $3,77,2 $ % Blister Beetle 744, %,5.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Corn Earw orm,48, % 6, 36.8% 744, %. $ $ % 2,722,292 $37,48,56 $ % Cutw orms 83,333 5.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Dectes Stem Borer 74, %.%.% $... $..% 2,864 $28,637 $.2.% Garden Webw orms 4,63.3%.% 36, % $ $.8.% $289,776 $.8.5% Grape Colaspis 74, %.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Grasshopper 9,74.7% 5,556.3% 5,.3% $8...3 $.2.% 7,374 $3,74 $.7.2% Green Cloverw orm,, 68.2%,.6% 9,56.6% $8...6 $.4.7% 42,955 $52, $.3.8% Kudzu Bug 28,333.7% 3.% 2.% $8... $..%,95 $2,553 $..% Lesser Cornstalk Borer 926.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Mexican Bean Beetle 66,667 4.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Potato Leafhopper 453, %.% 8,.% $8... $.9.% $44,888 $.9.2% Saltmarsh Caterpillar 7,47.5%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Soybean Aphid.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Soybean Looper,5, % 2, 2.3% 287,6 7.6% $ $2.47.4% 89,67 $2,924,92 $ % Spider Mites 29,63.8%.%.% $..5. $..% 5,727 $57,274 $.4.% Spotted Cucumber Beetle 853, %.%.% $... $..5% 33,4 $33,4 $.2.5% Stink Bugs (see box below ),24, 76.% 3, 8.4% 463, % $ $ % 239,69 $6,6,58 $ % Threecornered Alfalfa Hopper 925, %.%.% $..5. $..28% 78,98 $,789,84 $. 2.8% Thrips,63,.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Trochanter Mealybug.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Velvetbean Caterpillar 83,333 5.%.%.% $..5. $..3% 6,8 $6,82 $..3% Other.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..%.63 $ % 4,335,428 $63,532,78 $38.98.% State NC Total Bushels Harvested 58,68, Total Per Acre Species Year 26 Total Bushels Lost to Insects 4,335,428 Foliar s Costs $2,77,898 $2.38 Brow n 36 Total,63, Percent Yield Loss 6.88% Seed Treatment Costs $8,965, $5.5 Brow n Marmorated Yield/acre 36 Yield w /o Insects Scouting costs $,589,25 $.98 Green 55 Price/Bushel $. Ave. # Spray Applications.63 Total Costs $3,732,48 $8.85 Redbanded Scouted 5 Seed 896,5 Yield Lost to insects $43,354,279 $26.6 Redshouldered Scouting Fee/scouted acre $6.5 Scouted 244,5 Total Losses + Costs $74,86,428 $45.45 Southern Green 7 Insect Seed Trt. 55 Total Seed Trt Cost/ ac $.
12 Midsouth Entomologist 2 Appendix 7. Tennessee soybean insect losses, 26. Cost of apps per Loss + Cost/acre % Total Loss + Cost Armyw orm complex 8,.8% 9,.5%,.% $9..4. $..4% 32,235 $328,25 $.2.8% Banded Cucumber Beetle.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Bean Leaf Beetle,66,.%, 6.6%, 6.6%.2 $ $.72.2% 48,639 $2,659,522 $.6 4.6% Blister Beetle 8,.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Corn Earw orm 35, 2.%,3.% 7.% $. 3.. $..6% 47,9 $473,9 $ % Cutw orms 4, 2.4%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Dectes Stem Borer,3, 78.3%.% 9,.5% $ $.4.23% 74,66 $,796,95 $.8 9.8% Garden Webw orms.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Grape Colaspis 5,.9%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Grasshopper 8, 4.8%.%.% $..5. $..%,79 $7,729 $..% Green Cloverw orm,45, 87.3% 2,.2% 2,.2% $ $.9.26% 94,752 $2,78,48 $.25.4% Kudzu Bug 45, 27.% 3,.9% 43, 2.6% $ $.2.6% 2,88 $,55,469 $ % Lesser Cornstalk Borer.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Mexican Bean Beetle.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Potato Leafhopper.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Saltmarsh Caterpillar 9, 5.4% 3,.2%,7.% $ $..% 4,29 $53,66 $.3.3% Soybean Aphid.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Soybean Looper 9, 5.4% 24,.4% 8,.% $5..5. $.6.3% 2,47 $469,453 $ % Spider Mites 8,.5% 25.%.% $..5. $..% 79 $,773 $..% Spotted Cucumber Beetle.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Stink Bugs (see box below ),3, 78.3% 75, 4.5%, 6.% $ $.47.47% 349,2 $4,232,89 $ % Threecornered Alfalfa Hopper,66,.% 6, 3.6% 4, 2.4% $ $.8.2% 48,639 $,77,522 $.7 9.7% Thrips,66,.%.% 4,.8% $ $.4.5% 37,6 $437,88 $ % Trochanter Mealybug.%.%.% $..3. $..% $ $..% Velvetbean Caterpillar 9.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Other.%.% 79, 47.6% $ $.43.% $2,37, $.43 3.%.74 $ %,279,277 $8,239,962 $.99.% State TN Total Bushels Harvested 73,4, Total Per Acre Species Year 26 Total Bushels Lost to Insects,279,277 Foliar s Costs $5,575,25 $3.36 Brow n 8 Total,66, Percent Yield Loss.72% Seed Treatment Costs $5,577,6 $3.36 Brow n Marmorated 5 Yield/acre 44 Yield w /o Insects Scouting costs $4,53,8 $2.73 Green 76 Price/Bushel $9.9 Ave. # Spray Applications.74 Total Costs $5,684,525 $9.45 Redbanded Scouted 42 Seed 796,8 Yield Lost to insects $2,664,837 $7.63 Redshouldered Scouting Fee/scouted acre $6.5 Scouted 697,2 Total Losses + Costs $28,349,362 $7.8 Southern Green Insect Seed Trt. 48 Total Seed Trt Cost/ ac $7.
13 Midsouth Entomologist 3 Appendix 8. Virginia soybean insect losses, 26. Cost of apps per Loss + Cost/acre % Total Loss + Cost Armyw orm complex.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Banded Cucumber Beetle.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Bean Leaf Beetle.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Blister Beetle.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Corn Earw orm 25, 4.2%.% 2,5 2.% $...2 $.2.4% 9,36 $28,6 $.36.9% Cutw orms.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Dectes Stem Borer.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Garden Webw orms.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Grape Colaspis.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Grasshopper.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Green Cloverw orm.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Kudzu Bug.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Lesser Cornstalk Borer.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Mexican Bean Beetle.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Potato Leafhopper.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Saltmarsh Caterpillar.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Soybean Aphid,.2% 5.% 5.% $4... $..% $2, $..% Soybean Looper 5.% 5.% 5.% $... $..% 86 $6,863 $..4% Spider Mites.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Spotted Cucumber Beetle.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Stink Bugs (see box below ) 2, 33.3% 25, 4.2% 25, 4.2% $ $.9.67% 49,57 $,63,7 $ % Threecornered Alfalfa Hopper.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Thrips.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Trochanter Mealybug.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Velvetbean Caterpillar.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..% Other.%.%.% $... $..% $ $..%.64 $.4.7% 58,559 $,83,95 $3.5.% State VA Total Bushels Harvested 22,2, Total Per Acre Species Year 26 Total Bushels Lost to Insects 58,559 Foliar s Costs $244,5 $.4 Brow n 9 Total 6, Percent Yield Loss.7% Seed Treatment Costs $72, $.2 Brow n Marmorated Yield/acre 37 Yield w /o Insects Scouting costs $ $. Green 9 Price/Bushel $. Ave. # Spray Applications.64 Total Costs $964,5 $.6 Redbanded Scouted 2 Seed 6, Yield Lost to insects $,585,595 $2.64 Redshouldered Scouting Fee/scouted acre $. Scouted 2, Total Losses + Costs $2,55,95 $4.25 Southern Green Insect Seed Trt. Total Seed Trt Cost/ ac $2.
Statewide Insect Pest Survey in Soybeans
Statewide Insect Pest Survey in Soybeans Personnel: Bill Cissel, Extension IPM Agent Joanne Whalen, Extension IPM Specialist Objectives: 1. Establish a statewide monitoring system for soybean insect pests
More informationlimited, but still important where those uses are necessary and especially when other alternatives have already been used (e.g.
TO: ATTN: FROM: RE: Environmental Protection Agency Dr. Yu Ting Guilaran National Cotton States Arthropod Pest Management Working Group Docket ID EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0915 Acephate Risk Assessment, Case Number
More informationEffective insect control does not necessarily have to be an expensive component
Inexpensive insect control --in high yield soybeans Effective insect control does not necessarily have to be an expensive component of a high yield soybean production program. That s according to Mississippi
More informationLACA Technical Update February 10, Don Johnson Sr. Technical Support
FMC North America Crop LACA Technical Update February 10, 2011 Don Johnson Sr. Technical Support FMC Soybean Portfolio Soil applied herbicide for soybeans. Unique combination of 2 trusted and valuable
More informationImplications of Cover Crops for Soybean and Insect Management the good, the bad, and the ugly SCOTT D. STEWART THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE
Implications of Cover Crops for Soybean and Insect Management the good, the bad, and the ugly SCOTT D. STEWART THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE Cover Crops can have positive attributes that you are all well
More informationSOYBEAN INSECTICIDE PERFORMANCE RATING, 2017
SOYBEAN INSECTICIDE PERFORMANCE RATING, 2017 Stem Feeders Defoliators Defoliators and Pod Feeders Pod Feeders Rating Scale: 0 = no control 10 = excellent Chemistry Restricted Entry Interval (hours) Restricted
More informationInvesting in farming s future.
SM Investing in farming s future. Hero Soybeans Plant health is critical for optimized yields and it starts with prevention. The Dual-Action Technology found in Hero insecticide provides fast knockdown
More informationImplications of Cover Crops for Crop and Insect Management the good, the bad, and the ugly SCOTT D. STEWART THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE
Implications of Cover Crops for Crop and Insect Management the good, the bad, and the ugly SCOTT D. STEWART THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE Cover Crops can have positive attributes that you are all well aware
More informationSOYBEAN INSECTICIDE PERFORMANCE RATING, 2018
SOYBEAN INSECTICIDE PERFORMANCE RATING, 20 Stem Feeders Defoliators Defoliators and Pod Feeders Pod Feeders Rating Scale: 0 = no control 10 = excellent Chemistry Restricted Entry Interval (hours) Restricted
More informationPEAnut InSECt COntROl
Insect Insecticide Formulation/Acre lb ai/acre Acres/Gallon /Comments thrips acephate 0.35-0.5 DO NOT graze or feed vines treated with Treat with foliar Orthene 9 6- oz Orthene. insecticides when 0.0-0.05
More informationA Strategy for Prioritizing Research Goals and Outreach Plans to Reduce Soybean Production Losses Caused by Stink Bugs and Related Insect Pests
A Strategy for Prioritizing Research Goals and Outreach Plans to Reduce Soybean Production Losses Caused by Stink Bugs and Related Insect Pests Scott Akin, John All, Clint Allen, Roger Boerma, David Buntin,
More informationRelative Ranking and Risk to Sustainability of Pest Management Tools in the Virginia- Carolina Region of the United States
1 Relative Ranking and Risk to Sustainability of Pest Management Tools in the Virginia- Carolina Region of the United States D. L. Jordan 1, R. L. Brandenburg 2, B. B. Shew 2, D. Anco 3, M. Marshall 3,
More informationInsect Losses and Management on Desert Lettuce:
Insect Losses and Management on Desert Lettuce: 2 2 John C. Palumbo, Department of Entomology Introduction: The development of accurate data on the impact of insect pests on lettuce yield losses is important
More informationInsecticide Applications on Minnesota s 2016 Soybean Acres
Insecticide Applications on Minnesota s 2016 Soybean Acres Minnesota Department of Agriculture 625 Robert Street North St. Paul, MN 55155-2538 651-201-6000 1-800-967-AGRI www.mda.state.mn.us In accordance
More informationOverview of corn and alfalfa pest identification and damage
Overview of corn and alfalfa pest identification and damage Erin W. Hodgson Extension Entomologist Utah State University Utah Plant Pest Diagnostic Laboratory and Distance Diagnostics in Utah Program 18
More informationALFALFA INSECT CONTROL
ALFALFA INSECT CONTROL David Buntin, Research/Extension Entomologist At-Planting seed Cutworms, grubs, wireworms Lorsban 15G 6.7 lb. Apply in-furrow at planting for suppression of target pests. Do not
More informationCotton/Soybean Insect Newsletter
Cotton/Soybean Insect Newsletter Volume 12, Issue #17 Edisto Research and Education Center in Blackville, SC 7 Sept 2017 Pest Patrol Alerts The information contained herein each week is available via text
More informationALFALFA: ALFALFA INSECT CONTROL
ALFALFA: ALFALFA INSECT CONTROL David Buntin, Research/Extension Entomologist At-Planting Pests Cutworms, grubs, wireworms Lorsban 15G 6.6 lb 1.0 24 hours/ 21 days Apply in-furrow at planting for suppression
More information2016 Row Crops Inservice. Insect Updates SCOTT STEWART THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE
2016 Row Crops Inservice Training: Insect Updates SCOTT STEWART THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE CORN Non-Bt corn refuge requirements have not changed for 2016 The amount of non-bt corn required as a refuge
More informationCotton/Soybean Insect Newsletter
Cotton/Soybean Insect Newsletter Volume 13, Issue #9 Edisto Research & Education Center in Blackville, SC 29 June 2018 Pest Patrol Alerts The information contained herein each week is available via text
More informationALFALFA PEST MANAGEMENT
ALFALFA PEST MANAGEMENT Vonny M. Barlow, Ph.D. Entomology Advisor, University of California-Davis, Division of Agricultural & Natural Resources, Riverside County 42 Trinity-Klamath Mtn Intermountain Colusa
More informationEvaluation of Foliar-Applied Insecticides in Soybean
Evaluation of Foliar-Applied Insecticides in Soybean Terry A. DeVries, University of Nebraska, South Central Ag Laboratory, Clay Center, NE 68933 Robert J. Wright, Dept. Of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln,
More informationKansas State University Department of Entomology Newsletter
Kansas State University Department of Entomology Newsletter For Agribusinesses, Applicators, Consultants, Extension Personnel & Homeowners Department of Entomology 123 West Waters Hall K-State Research
More informationINSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOYBEANS Prepared by Douglas Johnson, Extension Entomologist
INSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOYBEANS- 2004 Prepared by Douglas Johnson, Extension Entomologist ENT-13 Kentucky now ranks among the major soybean producing states. More insect problems have been associated
More informationMID-ATLANTIC REGION CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER
MID-ATLANTIC REGION CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT COMPETENCY AREAS 2015 Copyright 2015 The American Society of Agronomy MID-ATLANTIC CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER (CCA)
More informationAssumptions. Preventing Insect Problems in Organic Vegetable Systems. Organic Insect Management. Integrated Pest Management. The Life of an Insect
Assumptions Preventing Insect Problems in Organic Vegetable Systems Small acreages High value crops - vegetables Diverse production Follow organic guidelines Rick Foster Department of Entomology Organic
More informationA super power in your herbicide and fungicide applications.
A super power in your herbicide and fungicide applications. Benefits of using both a fungicide and insecticide. 9 Hero Yield Data Tennessee Trials 9 Hero Yield Data Arkansas Trials 210 210 207 190 194
More informationIndex. life cycle and phenology of pupae relative methods of sampling of 217 spatial patterns of , 231
Above-ground arthropod sampling 30-58 absolute methods of 50-52 conversion of relative to absolute population estimates in 53-55 direct observations in 31-34 fumigation cage in 50-51 ground cloth sampling
More informationCotton/Soybean Insect Newsletter
Cotton/Soybean Insect Newsletter Volume 12, Issue #11 Edisto Research and Education Center in Blackville, SC 13 July 2017 Pest Patrol Alerts The information contained herein each week is available via
More informationPEST&CROP INDEX 2010
INSECTS, MITES & NEMATODES Alfalfa Caterpillar Yellow Butterflies Plentiful 20 PEST&CROP INDEX 2010 Alfalfa Weevil Alfalfa Weevil Scouting Should Begin in Southern Indiana 3 Don t Forget the Alfalfa Weevil
More informationfor Controlling Insects on Peanuts
L-704 ~~lx{&~ ~llij~[id~ for Controlling Insects on Peanuts TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE J. E. Hutchison, Director, College Station, Texas TEXAS GUIDE FOR CONTROLLING INSECTS
More informationBreak through the Yield Barrier. with Superior Soybean Insect and Disease Protection
Break through the Yield Barrier with Superior Soybean Insect and Disease Protection Better Plant Stands, Better Plant Vigor, Quicker Canopy and Higher Yields A CruiserMaxx Beans brand product is an insecticide
More informationBioCeres WP AzaGuard. IR-4 Bio-Pesticide Workshop, Presented by: Manuel Campos
BioCeres WP AzaGuard IR-4 Bio-Pesticide Workshop, 2016 Presented by: Manuel Campos BioCeres WP Active Ingredient: Beauveria bassiana strain-ant-03-20.0% w/w Shelf Life: 6 months Environmental Hazards:
More informationCotton/Soybean Insect Newsletter
Cotton/Soybean Insect Newsletter Volume 13, Issue #17 Edisto Research & Education Center in Blackville, SC 24 August 2018 Pest Patrol Alerts The information contained herein each week is available via
More informationStatement for the Record By. Leonard P. Gianessi Senior Research Associate. And. Janet E. Carpenter Research Associate
Statement for the Record By Leonard P. Gianessi Senior Research Associate And Janet E. Carpenter Research Associate National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy Washington, DC On Plant Genome Science:
More informationCotton/Soybean Insect Newsletter
Cotton/Soybean Insect Newsletter Volume 13, Issue #11 Edisto Research & Education Center in Blackville, SC 13 July 2018 Pest Patrol Alerts The information contained herein each week is available via text
More informationHow old are you? (1530 responses) 2009 Private Applicator Certification Program years years
2009 Private Applicator Certification Program IPM Assessment (Turning Point Data) Pesticide Safety & Environmental Education Program Fritz Breitenbach, IPM Specialist Lisa Behnken, Ryan Miller, Liz Stahl,
More informationKansas State University Department of Entomology Newsletter
Kansas State University Department of Entomology Newsletter For Agribusinesses, Applicators, Consultants, Extension Personnel & Homeowners Department of Entomology 123 West Waters Hall K-State Research
More information2. Where do you work?
BMSB Impact Survey First year of longitudinal study on the impact of the Brown Marmorated stink bug 4 key states, VA, PA, MD and NJ 26 sites (Grower and commodity meetings) Economic, societal, and educational
More informationInsect Management in Reduced Tillage Systems
Insect Management in Reduced Tillage Systems Scott D. Stewart University of Tennessee Jackson, TN Presented at 2003 Beltwide Cotton Conferences What is Reduced Tillage? Reduced tillage practices including
More informationBt11 MIR162 MON Refuge Seed Blend Corn Agrisure Viptera 3330 E-Z Refuge Agrisure Viptera 3330A E-Z Refuge
Plant-incorporated Protectant Label Market Label Bt11 MIR162 MON 89034 Refuge Seed Blend Corn Agrisure Viptera 3330 E-Z Refuge Agrisure Viptera 3330A E-Z Refuge Plant-incorporated protectants: Cry1Ab,
More informationCONVENTIONAL AND ORGANIC METHODS FOR INSECT PEST MANAGEMENT IN ALFALFA ABSTRACT
CONVENTIONAL AND ORGANIC METHODS FOR INSECT PEST MANAGEMENT IN ALFALFA Rachael Long 1, Charles Summers 2, and Larry Godfrey 3 ABSTRACT There are a number of insect pests found in alfalfa hay that can cause
More informationNo-till planting into cover crops: opportunities and obstacles ANGELA MCCLURE SCOTT D. STEWART & LARRY STECKEL
No-till planting into cover crops: opportunities and obstacles ANGELA MCCLURE SCOTT D. STEWART & LARRY STECKEL 100% black oats low biomass Single grass/legume moderate biomass multi species high biomass
More informationMID-ATLANTIC REGION CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER
MID-ATLANTIC REGION CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT COMPETENCY AREAS April 2010 MID-ATLANTIC CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER (CCA) PROGRAM PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES INTEGRATED
More informationSUPPLEMENTAL LABEL. RESTRICTED USE PESTICIDE Due to Toxicity to Fish and Aquatic Organisms
SUPPLEMENTAL LABEL Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. P. O. Box 18300 Greensboro, North Carolina 27419-8300 www.syngenta-us.com RESTRICTED USE PESTICIDE Due to Toxicity to Fish and Aquatic Organisms For retail
More informationSoybean Pests, Their Nature of Damage and Abundance with Various Environmental Factors
Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 6(6): 773-777, 2010 2010, INSInet Publication Soybean Pests, Their Nature of Damage and Abundance with Various Environmental Factors 1 M.A. Rahman
More informationIPM NEWSLETTER Update for Field Crops and Their Pests
The University of Tennessee IPM NEWSLETTER Update for Field Crops and Their Pests West TN Research and Education Center 605 Airways Boulevard Jackson, TN 38301 No. 22 August 28, 2009 Past newsletters and
More informationRice Insecticide Seed Treatments:
DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE RESEARCH & EXTENSION University of Arkansas System Agriculture and Natural Resources FSA7085 Rice Insecticide Seed Treatments: Is There Value to the Arkansas Rice Producer? Gus
More informationStink Bug and Lepidopteran Control in Soybean
LATMC 2010: Grain Crops Session Stink Bug and Lepidopteran Control in Soybean J. Davis, B. R. Leonard, and J. Baldwin Department of Entomology Louisiana State University Agricultural Center Topics to Cover
More informationARKANSAS RICE Dr. Chuck Wilson, Dr. Rick Cartwright, and Dr. Gus Lorenz
July 29, 2008 No. 2008 7R INTRODUCTION This newsletter is distributed during the growing season to provide updates on rice progress and problems. If you know of someone who would like to be added to the
More informationIPM Steps. Control Methods
Integrated Pest Management University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension Jenny Rees, Ron Seymour, Sarah Sivits, Wayne Ohnesorg, and Megan Taylor IPM Broad based approach Integration of practices for economic
More information1 Alfalfa Insect Control Recommendations E-220-W E-220-W. Field Crops ALFALFA INSECT CONTROL RECOMMENDATIONS
1 Alfalfa Insect Control Recommendations E-220-W E-220-W Field Crops Department of Entomology ALFALFA INSECT CONTROL RECOMMENDATIONS Christian H. Krupke, John L. Obermeyer and Larry W. Bledsoe, Extension
More informationDOC TA245.7 "\0 (001. Texas Agricultural Extension Service. The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas
DOC TA245.7 373 "\0 (001 Texas Agricultural Extension Service. The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas TABLE OF CONTENTS Economic Thresholds... 3 Inspecting Soybean Fields for Insects and
More informationChuck Danehower Extension Specialist Farm Management Danny Morris Extension Specialist Farm Management
Maximizing Essential Crop Inputs Chuck Danehower Extension Specialist Farm Management cdanehow@utk.edu Danny Morris Extension Specialist Farm Management danhmorr@utk.edu Tennessee State Average Yields
More informationSoybean Insects - Late-Season - Watch Fields Closely
September 2, 2005 No. 19 Soybean Insects - Late-Season - Watch Fields Closely With the possible exception of determining the identity of fields where elevated soybean stem borer infestations were thought
More informationBenefits of Pyrethroids to Citrus
PYRETHROIDS BENEFITS PROJECT The Pyrethroid Working Group contracted an extensive analysis of the benefits of to agriculture. A multitude of data was analyzed with different methodologies to determine
More informationCannabis Conundrum. PART 1 Commercial Production
Cannabis Conundrum Canadian Industrial Hemp Industry PART 1 Commercial Production UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT EXTENSION Northwest Crops and Soils Program 2019 Industrial Hemp Conference: A Grower s Tutorial
More informationIPM NEWSLETTER Update for Field Crops and Their Pests
The University of Tennessee IPM NEWSLETTER Update for Field Crops and Their Pests West TN Research and Education Center 605 Airways Boulevard Jackson, TN 38301 No. 15 July 15, 2005 Past Newsletters and
More informationUSDA ~ April 6, Dear Mr. Keigwin:
USDA ~ United States Department of Agriculture Office of the Chief Economist Room 112-A J.L. Whitten Building 1400 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20250-3810 April 6, 2015 Mr. Richard Keigwin
More informationA powerful choice for protecting your cotton Product Use Guide 8 th Edition
A powerful choice for protecting your cotton Product Use Guide 8 th Edition Solutions for the Growing World This Product Use Guide sets forth the requirements for growing WideStrike and WideStrike 3 Insect
More informationA Strategy for Priori.zing Research Goals and Outreach Plans to Reduce Soybean Produc.on Losses Caused by S.nk Bugs and Related Insect Pests
A Strategy for Priori.zing Research Goals and Outreach Plans to Reduce Soybean Produc.on Losses Caused by S.nk Bugs and Related Insect Pests Sco% Akin, John All, Clint Allen, Roger Boerma, David Bun;n,
More informationA Critique of: An Appraisal of EPA s Assessment of the Benefits of Bt Crops. This Critique is authored by Leonard P. Gianessi
A Critique of: An Appraisal of EPA s Assessment of the Benefits of Bt Crops by Dr. Charles M. Benbrook October 17, 2000 Prepared for Union of Concerned Scientists This Critique is authored by Leonard P.
More informationCrop Production ISSN:
Crop Production ISSN: 1936-3737 Released August 12, 2014, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Corn Production
More informationNeonicotinoid seed treatments (NSTs) and potential impacts on pollinators
Neonicotinoid seed treatments (NSTs) and potential impacts on pollinators Robert Koch University of Minnesota koch0125@umn.edu Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists http://blog-yard-garden-news.extension.umn.edu/2014/12/mode-of-action-of-neonicotinoids.html
More informationSeptember 21, RE: Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPP Dear Ms. Yu-Ting Guilaran:
September 21, 2018 Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory Public Docket (7502P) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20460 RE: Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0720
More informationINSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOYBEANS Prepared by Raul T. Villanueva, Extension Entomologist
INSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOYBEANS- 2019 Prepared by Raul T. Villanueva, Extension Entomologist ENT-13 Soybean acreage in Kentucky were estimated at 2.10 million acres, up 150,000 acres from 2017.
More informationYield potential for late-planted corn and soybeans
Yield potential for late-planted corn and soybeans Now that the 2013 planting season has come to a close, many growers are beginning to wonder about their fields yield potential. Many of our fields this
More informationInterpreting Pesticide Labels
Lesson C11 4: Interpreting Pesticide Labels Unit C. Plant and Soil Science Problem Area 11. Pesticide Use Lesson 4. Interpreting Pesticide Labels Learning Goal: Understand the relationships among science,
More informationIntegrated Pest Management in Mungbeans and Soybeans
Integrated Pest Management in Mungbeans and Soybeans Mungbeans, a brief description Short season, indeterminate tropical pulse Seed quality critical to achieve to top $$ IPM IS CHALLENGING BUT NOT IMPOSSIBLE
More informationFor control of insects infesting listed field, fruit, nut, and vegetable crops.
Restricted Use Pesticide Due to toxicity to fish and aquatic organisms. For retail sale to and use only by Certified Applicators, or persons under their direct supervision, and only for those uses covered
More informationIn 2000 Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, January 4-8, San Antonio, Texas, pp
In 2000 Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, January 4-8, San Antonio, Texas, pp. 76-79 VALUE OF BT AND HERBICIDE-RESISTANT COTTONS Janet E. Carpenter and Leonard P. Gianessi National Center for Food
More informationIntegrated Pest Management
Integrated Pest Management System or strategy Utilizes all methods of pest suppression Compatible Maintain pests below economically damaging level Environmentally sound Economically sound Biological Control
More informationImpact of Tillage Systems on Insect, Mite & Slug Pests and Their Control in Selected Field Crops
Impact of Tillage Systems on Insect, Mite & Slug Pests and Their Control in Selected Field Crops Prof. C. Richard Edwards Purdue University January 11, 2013 Range of Tillage Systems* Conventional Tillage
More informationThe Market-leading Seed Treatment Just Got Better
The Market-leading Seed Treatment Just Got Better Introducing Vibrance fungicide seed treatment to the soybean market TM Protecting Highvalue Seed to Deliver Higher Returns Growers are always on the lookout
More informationVolume XLI Issue 8, May 25, General Situation. Cotton
Pest Cast The Row Crops IPM Newsletter for the LRGV, a cooperative project of Texas AgriLife Extension Service and the Cotton & Grain Producers of the lower Rio Grande Valley Danielle Sekula IPM Extension
More informationNeonicotinoids. Neonicotinoid Profile. Safety. Neonicotinoids and Bees
What We re Learning About Neonicotinoid Insecticides, and New Insects and Insecticides for 2014 Rick Foster and Kira Nixon Department of Entomology Purdue University Neonicotinoids Bind to the nicotinic
More informationSoybean IPM Elements Revised March, 2012
Soybean IPM Elements Revised March, 2012 Edited by Jim Jasinski Contributing Authors: Ron Hammond, Andy Michels (Entomology); Mark Loux, Mark Sulc, Peter Thomison (Horticulture & Crop Science); Robert
More informationChallenges to Producing Peanuts Using the Organic Approach
Challenges to Producing Peanuts Using the Organic Approach David Jordan, Crop and Soil Sciences North Carolina State University 919-515-4068 david_jordan@ncsu.edu I bet you could sell every pound of organic
More informationFARMER FRIENDLY SUMMARY. Cotton Insect Pest Management, Agreement TN Scott Stewart, The University of Tennessee
FARMER FRIENDLY SUMMARY Cotton Insect Pest Management, Agreement 13-589 TN Scott Stewart, The University of Tennessee Funding is used to partially support general extension activities such as scout training,
More informationThe Comparative Advantage of Upland Cotton Production in Texas
The Texas Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resource 19:31-38 (2006) 31 The Comparative Advantage of Upland Cotton Production in Texas Xiaoling (Sherry) Yu Department of Management, Tarim University,
More informationAGRIS Co-operative and Wanstead Farmers Co-operative
Brought to you by AGRIS Co-operative and Wanstead Farmers Co-operative Volume No.3, Issue Number 8, March 28, 2011 Spring Agronomy Updates *Articles Courtesy of GROWMARK Agronomy Services PREPARE TO BATTLE
More informationEC Insecticide Recommendations for Garden Vegetables
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Historical Materials from University of Nebraska- Lincoln Extension Extension 1989 EC89-1552 Insecticide Recommendations
More informationResponse to World Wildlife Fund Background Paper Transgenic Cotton: Are There Benefits for Conservation?
Response to World Wildlife Fund Background Paper Transgenic Cotton: Are There Benefits for Conservation? By Janet Carpenter National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy 1616 P Street NW, First Floor
More informationGreen Bean Production and Management
WISCONSIN VEGETABLE SUSTAINABILITY GREEN/SNAP BEAN SPECIFIC PROTOCOL - DRAFT 1/25/2012 Developed by the Wisconsin Institute for Sustainable Agriculture, University of Wisconsin - Madison Note: To determine
More informationINSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOYBEANS 2018 ENT 13 Prepared by Raul T. Villanueva, Extension Entomologist
INSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOYBEANS 2018 ENT 13 Prepared by Raul T. Villanueva, Extension Entomologist Kentucky now ranks among the major soybean producing states. More insect problems have been associated
More informationA Year in Review: 2001 Pest Problems Across Manitoba
22 A Year in Review: 21 Pest Problems Across Manitoba David Kaminski, Soils & Crops Branch Manitoba Agriculture & Food, Carman, MB RG J (dkaminski@gov.mb.ca) Our individual perspectives on the impact of
More informationECONOMIC BENEFITS OF NEONICOTINOID INSECTICIDES
ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF NEONICOTINOID INSECTICIDES IN THE U.S. AND CANADA Paul D. Mitchell University of Wisconsin 8 th International IPM Symposium Salt Lake City, UT, March 26, 2015 Acknowledgement: This
More informationInsects in Vegetables: A Review of 2011 and What to Know for Rick Foster Purdue University
Insects in Vegetables: A Review of 2011 and What to Know for 2012 Rick Foster Purdue University CABBAGE CATERPILLARS n c t s ai Diamondback Moth Most serious pest worldwide $1 billion annually Resistant
More informationEvaluation of Organic Barley Varieties and Organic No-Till Soybean Demonstration, Southeast Research Farm, 2017
Evaluation of Organic Barley Varieties and Organic No-Till Soybean Demonstration, Southeast Research Farm, 2017 Kathleen Delate, professor Rebecca Johnson, undergraduate research asst. Departments of Horticulture
More informationEPA Docket: EPA- HQ- OPP Date Submitted: January 17, 2017
Agricultural Experiment Station Cooperative Extension 37860 West Smith-Enke Road Maricopa, Arizona 85138 (520) 568-2273 FAX: (520) 568-2556 Chlorpyrifos Use in Arizona and New Mexico Prepared by Alfred
More information46 th SOUTHERN FOREST INSECT WORK CONFERENCE
46 th SOUTHERN FOREST INSECT WORK CONFERENCE Report on Losses Caused by Forest Insects July 29 August 1, 2002 @ Roanoke, Virginia To: Members of the Southern Forest Insect Work Conference The attached
More informationINSECT MANAGEMENT. Scott Stewart WTREC, Jackson, TN University of Tennessee Extension. Corn Seed Treatments (company offerings)
INSECT MANAGEMENT Scott Stewart WTREC, Jackson, TN University of Tennessee Extension Corn Seed Treatments (company offerings) DeKalb (Monsanto) Pioneer Syngenta Acceleron Acceleron + Poncho/VOTiVO PPST
More informationArea Crops Exam 2014
Area Crops Exam 2014 Instructions: Read each multiple-choice statement carefully and then mark the answer on the score sheet that corresponds to the best answer. You may use a calculator and the yellow
More informationUSDA Long Grain Rice Planted Acreage June 30, 2017 with Prospective Planting Comparison March 31, Rice U.S. and States June 30, 2017
- USDA Long Grain Rice Planted Acreage - USDA Harvested Rice Acreage by Class U.S. and States - U.S. Soybeans, Corn, Sorghum & Cotton - NASS Acreage, Grain Stocks and Rice Stocks Executive Summary June
More informationCrop Production ISSN:
Crop Production ISSN: 1936-3737 Released October 10, 2014, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Corn Production
More informationManaging Corn Pests with Bt Corn: Some Questions and Answers March 2003
Managing Corn Pests with Bt Corn: Some Questions and Answers March 2003 Frank B. Peairs Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University Introduction New technology
More informationNew Soybean Pests and IPM Study Results 2016
New Soybean Pests and IPM Study Results 2016 Dr. Moneen Jones, Research Entomologist Soybean Podworm Induced Resistance to Compare Management Strategies We treated newly hatched, first instar SPW larvae
More informationCotton Varieties. for Louisiana. LSU AgCenter Pub 2135 Cotton Varieties for Louisiana
2012 Cotton Varieties for Louisiana LSU AgCenter Pub 2135 Cotton Varieties for Louisiana 2012 1 2 LSU AgCenter Pub 2135 Cotton Varieties for Louisiana 2012 Table of Contents Introduction...................................................................
More informationArkansas soybean producers use several
Chapter 16 Production Systems and Economics by L. Ashlock, W. Mayhew, T. Windham, T. Keisling, R. Klerk, D. Beaty and G. Lorenz Arkansas soybean producers use several different irrigated and non-irrigated
More informationExtension to VG02030 Integrated Pest Management in the Green Bean Industry
Extension to VG02030 Integrated Pest Management in the Green Bean Industry John Duff QLD Department of Primary Industries & Fisheries Project Number: VG06016 VG06016 This report is published by Horticulture
More information