ASCE 7-10 Significant Changes to the Wind Load Provisions

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "ASCE 7-10 Significant Changes to the Wind Load Provisions"

Transcription

1 ASCE 7-10 Significant Changes to the Wind Load Provisions William L. Coulbourne, P.E. SECB Applied Technology Council (ATC)

2 Acknowledgements Ron Cook, Univ. of Florida, Wind Load Task Committee Chairman T. Eric Stafford, T. Eric Stafford & Associates Peter Vickery, Applied Research Associates Larry Griffis, Walter P. Moore and Associates ASCE 7 Wind Load Subcommittee NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 2

3 Today s Agenda Classification of buildings Reorganization of wind provisions New wind maps MWFRS and C&C New Simplified Procedure for buildings with h 160 ft. Example problem NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 3

4 ASCE 7-05 Chapter 6 Design Methods Simplified Method (low-rise) Analytical Method Low-rise buildings Buildings of all heights Other Structures Wind Tunnel Procedure All in one chapter Confusing? Yes! NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 4

5 ASCE 7-10 Significant Changes Changes to Building Classification (Chapter 1) Complete reorganization of wind provisions New wind speed maps New wind-borne debris region Re-introduction of Exposure D for water surfaces in hurricane-prone regions Simplified procedure for buildings < 160 ft NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 5

6 Classification of Buildings Use or Occupancy of Buildings and Structures Buildings and other structures that represent a low risk to human life in the event of failure: All buildings and other structures except those listed in Risk Categories I, III, and IV Buildings and other structures, the failure of which could pose a substantial risk to human life. Buildings and other structures, not included in Occupancy Category IV, with potential to cause a substantial economic impact and/or mass disruption of day-to-day civilian life in the event of failure Buildings and other structures not included in Risk Category IV (including, but not limited to, facilities that manufacture, process, handle, store, use, or dispose of such substances as hazardous fuels, hazardous chemicals, hazardous waste, or explosives) containing toxic or explosive substances where the quantity of the material exceeds a threshold quantity established by the authority having jurisdiction and is sufficient to pose a threat to the public if released. Buildings and other structures designated as essential facilities. Buildings and other structures, the failure of which could pose a substantial hazard to the community. Buildings and other structures (including, but not limited to, facilities that manufacture, process, handle, store, use, or dispose of such substances as hazardous fuels, hazardous chemicals, or hazardous waste) containing sufficient quantities of highly toxic substances where the quantity exceeds a threshold quantity established by the authority having jurisdiction to be dangerous to the public if released and is sufficient to pose a threat to the public if released. a Buildings and other structures required to maintain the functionality of other Category IV structures. Risk Category I NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 6 II III IV

7 Classification of Buildings Risk Categorization. Buildings and other structures shall be classified, based on the risk to human life, health and welfare associated with their damage or failure by nature of their occupancy or use, according to Table 1-1 for the purposes of applying flood, wind, snow, earthquake, and ice provisions. Each building or other structure shall be assigned to the highest applicable risk category or categories. Minimum design loads for structures shall incorporate the applicable Importance Factors given in Table 1-2, as required by other Sections of this Standard. Assignment of a building or other structure to multiple risk categories based on the type of load condition being evaluated (e.g., wind or seismic) shall be permitted. When the building code or other referenced standard specifies an Occupancy Category, the Risk Category shall not be taken as lower than the Occupancy Category specified therein. NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 7

8 Classification of Buildings Guidance on what types of buildings might fall into each Risk Category is now gone from the body of the standard. Examples are still provided in the Commentary. Elimination of the specific examples of buildings that fall into each category has the benefit that it eliminates the potential for conflict between the standard and locally adopted codes and also provides individual communities and development teams the flexibility to interpret acceptable risk for individual projects. NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 8

9 Reorganization of Wind Provisions New organization (based on the more user-friendly multi-chapter seismic provisions): 6 new Chapters (Chapters 26-31) Flowcharts on how to use in each chapter Intent is to clarify the applicability of the wind provisions NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 9

10 Reorganization of Wind Provisions Chapter 26 General Requirements Chapter 27 MWFRS Directional Procedure Chapter 28 MWFRS Envelope Procedure Chapter 29 MWFRS Other Structures and Appurtenances Chapter 30 Components and Cladding Chapter 31 Wind Tunnel Procedure NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 10

11 Reorganization of Wind Provisions Chapter 26 General Requirements Scoping Definitions Wind speed map Exposure Gust factor Topographic factor NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 11

12 MWRFS Directional Procedure Buildings of all heights (old Figure 6-6, new Figure ) NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 12

13 MWFRS Directional Procedure A procedure for determining wind loads on buildings and other structures for specific wind directions, in which the external pressure coefficients utilized are based on past wind tunnel testing of prototypical building models for the corresponding direction of wind. NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 13

14 MWRFS Envelope Procedure Buildings 60 ft (old Figure 6-10, new Figure ) NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 14

15 MWFRS Envelope Procedure A procedure for determining wind load cases on buildings, in which pseudo external pressure coefficients are derived from past wind tunnel testing of prototypical building models successively rotated through 360 degrees, such that the pseudo pressure cases produce key structural actions (uplift, horizontal shear, bending moments, etc.) that envelop their maximum values among all possible wind directions. NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 15

16 Reorganization of Wind Provisions Chapter 27 MWFRS Directional Procedure Part 1: Buildings of all heights method Part 2: New simplified method for simple diaphragm buildings 160 ft NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 16

17 Reorganization of Wind Provisions Chapter 28 MWFRS Envelope Procedure Part 1: Low-rise ( 60 ft) buildings method Part 2: Simplified method for low-rise ( 60 ft) simple diaphragm buildings NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 17

18 Reorganization of Wind Provisions Chapter 29 MWFRS Other Structures and Appurtenances Signs Rooftop structures Other structures NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 18

19 Reorganization of Wind Provisions Chapter 30 Components and Cladding 1. Envelope method for h 60 ft 2. Simplified method for h 60 ft 3. Directional method for h > 60 ft 4. Simplified method for h 160 ft 5. Analytical method for open buildings of all heights 6. Building appurtenances and roof top structures NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 19

20 Reorganization of Wind Provisions Chapter 31 Wind Tunnel Procedure NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 20

21 New Wind Speed Maps New data and data analysis indicate current ASCE 7 hurricane wind speeds are generally conservative Introduction of ultimate wind speed maps LRFD Wind Load Factor = 1.0 ASD Wind Load Factor = 0.6 Specific maps for each building category NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 21

22 Facts About the ASCE 7-05 Wind Speed Map In most of the non-hurricane US mainland, the mapped values represented a 50-year mean recurrence interval In hurricane regions, the mapped values varied from 50 to 100 years along the hurricane coastline Wind speeds along the hurricane coastline had been adjusted upward so that when incorporated with the wind LF, produce a wind load having a consistent hazard level with the interior US (700 MRI) NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 22

23 Wind Speed vs MRI ASCE 7-05 V(T)/V50 = (LF) Non-Hurricane V(T)/V(50)= ln(12T) Hurricane V(T)/V(50)=0.167ln(12T) 0.97 x x MRI T For Non-Hurr V map = 50 Yr MRI For Hurr, V map = 500 yr/(1.5) = ; 97 MRI NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 23

24 3.50 Wind Pressure vs MRI ASCE 7-05 P(T)/P50 = LF Hurricane Non-Hurricane Non Hurr: V map = 50 yr MRI Hurr: V map = 97 yr MRI MRI T NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 24

25 P(T)/P50 = LF Wind Pressure vs MRI ASCE Hurricane Non-Hurricane With I=1.15 Map V for hurr. (> 50 yr) MRI T NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 25

26 Why Change the Map? Current hybrid pseudo MRI Map confusing Designers, students, clients Most Users Don t Know LF =1.6: 700 yr MRI ultimate wind speed Importance Factor of 1.15: 1700 yr MRI Update for new hurricane model Provide 3 Maps: 300 yr (Cat 1), 700 yr (Cat 2) 1700 yr (Cat 3,4) Eliminate Wind Importance Factors NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 26

27 New Hurricane Model Summary New intensity model includes ocean mixing to limit hurricane intensity (defined by central pressure) New statistical model for Holland B parameter (yields lower wind speeds than 2000 model) New filling (storm weakening after landfall) model New wind field model 100,000 year simulation vs. 20,000 in the old map Map developed using 2851 pts vs. 208 in the old map NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 27

28 New Wind Speed Maps Specific maps for each building category Category II buildings 700 year return period wind speed Category III and IV buildings 1700 year return period wind speeds Category I buildings 300 year return period wind speeds Importance Factor no longer required Serviceability maps (10, 25, 50 and 100 year) to be included in Appendix C Find wind NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 28

29 Site-Specific Wind Speed Example Location: New Orleans, LA NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 29

30 700 Year RP Winds 115(51) 110(49) 130(58) 140(63) 120(54) 115(51) 115(51) 140(63) 150(67) 150(67) 140(63) 130(58) 120(54) 110(49) 160(72) 170(76) 140(63) 150(67) 160(72) 170(76) 110(49) 115(51) 150(67) 120(54) 130(58) 140(63) 180(80) 180(80) 160(72) 160(72) 120(54) 130(58) 140(63) 150(67) Special Wind Region Location Vmph (m/s) Guam 195 (87) Virgin Islands 165 (74) American Samoa 160 (72) Hawaii Special Wind Region Statewide 150(67) 160(72) 170(76) Puerto Rico Notes: 1. Values are nominal design 3-second gust wind speeds in miles per hour (m/s) at 33 ft (10m) above ground for Exposure C category. 2. Linear interpolation between contours is permitted. 3. Islands and coastal areas outside the last contour shall use the last wind speed contour of the coastal area. 4. Mountainous terrain, gorges, ocean promontories, and special wind regions shall be examined for unusual wind conditions. 5. Wind speeds correspond to approximately a 7% probability of exceedance in 50 years (Annual Exceedance Probability = , MRI = 700 Years). NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 30

31 New V 700 / 1.6 vs. ASCE NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 31

32 1700 Year RP Winds 120(54) 115(52) 130(58) 140(63) 150(67) 120(54) 160(72) 120(54) 150(67) 160(72) 160(72) 150(67) 140(63) 130(58) 120(54) 115(51) 170(76) 180(80) 150(67) 160(72) 170(76) 180(80) 190(85) 115(51) 120(54) 120(54) 160(72) 130(58) 140(63) 150(67) 200(89) 200(89) 165(74) 165(74) 130(58) 140(63) 150(67) Special Wind Region Location Vmph (m/s) Guam 210 (94) Virgin Islands 175 (78) American Samoa 170 (76) Hawaii Special Wind Region Statewide 160(72) 170(76) 180(80) Puerto Rico Notes: 1. Values are nominal design 3-second gust wind speeds in miles per hour (m/s) at 33 ft (10m) above ground for Exposure C category. 2. Linear interpolation between contours is permitted. 3. Islands and coastal areas outside the last contour shall use the last wind speed contour of the coastal area. 4. Mountainous terrain, gorges, ocean promontories, and special wind regions shall be examined for unusual wind conditions. 5. Wind speeds correspond to approximately a 3% probability of exceedance in 50 years (Annual Exceedance Probability = , MRI = 1700 Years). NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 32

33 300 Year RP Winds 105(47) 100(45) 110(49) 120(54) 130(58) 105(47) 140(63) 105(47) 130(58) 140(63) 140(63) 130(58) 120(54) 110(49) 105(47) 130(58) 140(63) 150(67) 150(67) 160(72) 150(67) 150(67) 105(47) 110(49) 120(54) 130(58) 140(63) 105(47) 110(49) 140(63) Location Vmph (m/s) Guam 180 (80) Virgin Islands 150 (67) American Samoa 150 (67) Hawaii Special Wind Region Statewide 140(63) 150(67) 160(72) Puerto Rico Notes: 1. Values are nominal design 3-second gust wind speeds in miles per hour (m/s) at 33 ft (10m) above ground for Exposure C category. 2. Linear interpolation between contours is permitted. 3. Islands and coastal areas outside the last contour shall use the last wind speed contour of the coastal area. 4. Mountainous terrain, gorges, ocean promontories, and special wind regions shall be examined for unusual wind conditions. 5. Wind speeds correspond to approximately a 15% probability of exceedance in 50 years (Annual Exceedance Probability = , MRI = 300 Years). NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions (54) 130(58) Speical Wind Region 170(76) 170(76)

34 Wind speeds at selected locations Location ASCE 7-05 Exposure C V 700 / 1.6 Exposure C Exposure D Bar Harbor, Maine Boston, MA Hyannis, MA New Port, RI Southampton, NY Atlantic City, NJ Wrightsville Beach, NC Folly Beach, SC Miami Beach Clearwater, FL Panama City, FL Biloxi, MS Galveston, TX Port Aransas, TX Hawaii Guam NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 34

35 ASCE 7-10 Strength Design Load Combinations 1.4D 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5(L r or S or R) 1.2D + 1.6(L r or S or R) + (L or 0.5W) 1.2D + 1.0W + L + 0.5(L r or S or R) 1.2D + 1.0E + L + 0.2S 0.9D+ 1.0W 0.9D + 1.0E NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 35

36 ASCE 7-10 Allowable Stress Design Load Combinations D D + L D + (L r or S or R ) D L (L r or S or R) D + (0.6W or 0.7E) D L (0.6W) (L r or S or R) D L (0.7 E) S 0.6D + 0.6W 0.6D + 0.7E NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 36

37 Windborne Debris Region Current Standard V > 120 or 110 within one mile of coast Exact Mapping (new 700 year map) =152~ =139~140 New Standard V > 140 or 130 within one mile of coast Results in less area within WBD Region than the existing standard NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 37

38 NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 38

39 NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 39 39

40 Reintroduction of Exposure D in Hurricane- Prone Regions Older research and modeling suggested roughness of ocean approached Exposure C with increase in wind speed Hence ASCE 7-98, -02, and -05 classified water surfaces in hurricaneprone regions as Exposure C NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 40

41 Reintroduction of Exposure D in Hurricane- Prone Regions New research suggests hurricane coastline matches the exposure description for Exposure D Roughness of ocean does not continue to increase with increasing wind speed. NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 41

42 Exposure D Gust Wind Speed Ratio (Marine/Land) Vickery et al. (2000a) Vickery et al. (2008a), RMW=20 km Vickery et al. (2008a), RMW=40 km Vickery et al. (2008a), RMW=80 km Mean Wind Speed at 10m Over Water (m/sec) NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 42

43 Summary of Wind Maps Use individual maps for structures with different life-safety concerns rather than using Importance Factors A 1.0 load factor for LRFD (same as Seismic) A 0.6 load factor for ASD design The result is consistent with the intent of ASCE 7-98 and better represents life-safety objectives Exposure D must be used on hurricane coastlines Serviceability wind load maps are in Appendix C NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 43

44 New Simplified Procedure Applicable to buildings less than or equal to 160 ft in height Simple diaphragm buildings Frequency limitations and torsional limitations Tabular loads for MWFRS and Components and Cladding NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 44

45 Simplified Wind Design - MWFRS Chapter 27 - Part 2 Simple diaphragm buildings Enclosed building (GCpi = + or 0.18) h 160 feet Flat, monoslope, mansard roofs, gable roofs Based on ASCE 7-10 Figure Part 1 Traditional Directional Approach NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 45

46 Simple Diaphragm Building Building - with vertically spanning wall systems in which both windward and leeward wind loads are transmitted through floor and roof diaphragms (rigid or flexible) to the same MWFRS NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 46

47 Simple Diaphragm Building Main Wind Force Resisting System (MWFRS) rigid or flexible floor diaphragms Vertically spanning walls NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 47

48 Simplified 160 ft Method Two Classes of Buildings Class 1: Simple diaphragm building h 60 ft 0.2 L/B 5.0 K zt = 1.0 or calculated B L h NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 48

49 Assumptions Class 1 Bldgs Rigid or flexible diaphragm enclosed buildings h 60 ft. 0.2 L/B 5.0 (interpolate between) No topographic effects (K zt = 1) or calculate Symmetric placement MWFRS MWFRS placed so that torsion does not control (guidance provided) NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 49

50 Simplified 160 ft Method Two Classes of Buildings Class 2: Simple diaphragm building 60 h 160 ft 0.5 L/B 2.0 K zt = 1.0 or calculated B L h NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 50

51 Assumptions Class 2 Bldgs Rigid or flexible diaphragm enclosed buildings h = ft. Period T = h/75 seconds (upper bound) Damping = 1.5% (lower bound) L/B = , 2.0 (interpolate between) No topographic effects (K zt = 1) or calculate Symmetric placement MWFRS elements MWFRS placed so that torsion does not control (guidance provided) NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 51

52 Why is Building Period Important? Related to mass and stiffness of building Stiffness affects drift and motion perception Mass affects wind forces Mass affects seismic forces Mass affects motion perception Period affects Gust Effect Factor, thus pressure p Buildings with high periods interact more with the wind Note: Higher Period T is conservative (opposite from seismic!) NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 52

53 Wall Pressures NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 53

54 Internal pressure GC pi Affects M, V, uplift in one story rigid frame buildings Cancels out in simple diaphragm buildings NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 54

55 Wind Pressure Equation p qg f C p q i GC p - General Equation (27.4-2) p qg f C p - For simple diaphragm buildings p z G f q z C pw q h C pl - windward, leeward walls NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 55

56 Wind Pressure Vs Height ASCE p = 1.04p 160 Height (ft) h=160 ft. V=120 MPH Exposure C T=h/75 Damping=1% ASCE 7-05 Exact Simplified 20 0 p Pressure (psf) NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 56

57 Wind Load Equations Pressure (psf): p z = p 0 (1 - z / h) + (z / h) p h z p z p h Table values p 0 Story Shear (pounds): v z = 0.5(h - z) [(p 0 (1 - z / h) + p h (1 + z / h)] z v z Overturning Moment (ft.-pounds): m z = 1/3 (h - z) 2 [0.5p 0 (1 z / h) + p h ( z / h)] z m z NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 57

58 Tabularized Wall Pressures NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 58

59 Story Shear Vs Height Exact vs Simplified Height (ft) Story Shear (pounds) NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 59

60 Story Moment Vs Height Exact vs Simplified Height (ft) Moment (foot-pounds) NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 60

61 Roof Pressures - MWFRS Roof Pressure Zones Roof Shapes: Flat Gable Hip Monoslope Mansard NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 61

62 Height h (ft) Roof Slope Roof Zone V (MPH) Exposure B,C,D Tables NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 62 Pressure (psf) (Two load cases for sloped roofs)

63 Example Problem Building is 100 ft. tall with flat roof The wind speed from ASCE 7-05 was 140 mph Ocean exposure Category II enclosed building Dimensions are B = 40 ft. and L = 200 ft. Determine pressures at 100 ft. using All heights method of ASCE 7-05, ASCE 7-10, and the Simplified Method for buildings less than 160 ft. from ASCE 7-10 NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 63

64 Comparative Results Engineering Standard Windward Wall (psf) Roof Edge Zone (psf) ASCE 7-05 Exposure C ASCE 7-10 Exposure D Simplified Exposure D NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 64

65 Components and Cladding Chapter 30 Part 4 p h = q h [(G C p ) (GC pi )] = q h (GC p ) net GC pi values for enclosed buildings are taken as +(-) GC p values : Flat roofs Fig for zones 1-3 Gable roofs, mansard roofs Fig A, B, C for zones 1-3 Hip roofs Fig B for zones 1-3 Monoslope roofs Fig A, B for zones 1-3 Wall zones 4 and 5 for all cases from Fig Table pressures based on h and q h NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 65

66 Component and Cladding Wall and Roof Zones NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 66

67 Component and Cladding Pressures Height h (ft) Roof Shape Load Case Zone Exposure C Effective Wind Area = 10 sf V (mph) NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 67

68 Exposure Amplification Factor Roof and Wall Pressures - Components and Cladding Exposure Amplification Factor Building height h (ft) B/C Exp. Ampl. Factor h (ft) B/C D/C D/C Multiplier to Table pressures Exp B, D Ratio Exposure B/C, D/C NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 68

69 Reduction Factors - Effective Wind Area 1.1 Reduction Factors Effective Wind Area Roof type/case A B 0.9 C 0.9 Reduction Factor 0.8 D E Effective Wind Area (sf) NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 69

70 Other Changes 30 items approved by the Wind Load Subcommittee Examples: Improved roughness definitions and examples Revisions to low-rise envelope method Guidelines on wind-tunnel testing Reduced minimum load on projected area of roof etc, etc. NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 70

71 Questions? NCSEA Webinar ASCE 7-10 Changes in Wind Load Provisions 71

CALCULATING WIND LOADS ON LOW-RISE STRUCTURES PER 2015 WFCM ENGINEERING PROVISIONS (STD342-1)

CALCULATING WIND LOADS ON LOW-RISE STRUCTURES PER 2015 WFCM ENGINEERING PROVISIONS (STD342-1) CALCULATING WIND LOADS ON LOW-RISE STRUCTURES PER 015 WFCM ENGINEERING PROVISIONS (STD34-1) John Buddy Showalter, P.E. Vice President, Technology Transfer American Wood Council Description The Wood Frame

More information

LATERAL LOADS ON BRICK VENEER RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES

LATERAL LOADS ON BRICK VENEER RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES LATERAL LOADS ON BRICK VENEER RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES W. Mark McGinley 1, PhD, PE and Eric N. Johnson 2, PE ABSTRACT In North American residential construction, brick veneer is typically used as a cladding

More information

APPENDIX A - Seismic Terms, Tables and Figures:

APPENDIX A - Seismic Terms, Tables and Figures: APPENDIX A - Seismic Terms, Tables and Figures: Seismic Design Force, (F p ) G-force that the unit must be able to withstand. This number is calculated using the factors described below. a S 0.4 P DS z

More information

Florida Structural Engineers

Florida Structural Engineers Florida Structural Engineers South Florida Chapter January 8, 2008 Miami Lakes, Florida Aluminum Association of Florida, Inc. Joe Belcher ~ David Miller AAF Code Involvement: Historical Perspective 1998:

More information

2012 International Building Code Errata (Portions of text and tables not shown are unaffected by the errata)

2012 International Building Code Errata (Portions of text and tables not shown are unaffected by the errata) SEVENTH PRINTING (Updated October 13, 2014) Figure 1608.2 GROUND SNOW LOADS, p g, FOR THE UNITED STATES (psf) (Revise southern California values as indicated in the figure) SIXTH PRINTING (Updated June

More information

HAZUS Coastal Storm Surge Model

HAZUS Coastal Storm Surge Model HAZUS User Conference Indianapolis August 24, 2010 HAZUS Coastal Storm Surge Model Frank Lavelle, Peter Vickery, Bo Yu, and Sudhan Banik Applied Research Associates, Inc. Raleigh, NC (919) 582-3350 Project

More information

Considerations for Outof-Plane. Design

Considerations for Outof-Plane. Design Considerations for Outof-Plane Wall and Uplift Design WoodWorks Texas Workshops December, 2016 Overview Uplift Wall Design Wind Loads Wind loads acting on buildings are modeled as uniform surface loads.

More information

Wind Tunnel Applications for Buildings

Wind Tunnel Applications for Buildings Wind Tunnel Applications for Buildings Presented by: Jim Swanson, Halvorson and Partners Donald Scott, PCS Structural Solutions Jon Galsworthy, RWDI Add Company Logo Here Outline 1. Introduction 2. ASCE7

More information

PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE 2012 BUILDING CODE O. REG. 332/12 AS AMENDED

PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE 2012 BUILDING CODE O. REG. 332/12 AS AMENDED Ministry of Municipal Affairs PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE 2012 BUILDING CODE O. REG. 332/12 AS AMENDED CHANGE NUMBER: SOURCE: B-04-01-11 Ontario-NBC CODE REFERENCE: Division B / 4.1.7. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED

More information

Appendix I ESTIMATED DESIGN WIND PRESSURE AND STRENGTHS OF CONNECTIONS OF JOPLIN HOME DEPOT BUILDING

Appendix I ESTIMATED DESIGN WIND PRESSURE AND STRENGTHS OF CONNECTIONS OF JOPLIN HOME DEPOT BUILDING ESTIMATED DESIGN WIND PRESSURE AND STRENGTHS OF CONNECTIONS OF JOPLIN HOME DEPOT BUILDING I.1 ESTIMATED DESIGN WIND PRESSURE BASED ON BOCA NBC/1996 Basic design wind speed: V = 90 mph (3 s gust) Exposure

More information

MAT109: Introduction to the Wood Frame Construction Manual

MAT109: Introduction to the Wood Frame Construction Manual MAT109: Introduction to the Wood Frame Construction Manual One of the documents published by AF&PA is the Wood Frame Construction Manual for One- & Two-Family Dwellings. The WFCM is referenced in the IRC

More information

Lateral load basics Code acceptance of Standard. Standard Overview 2008 Wind & Seismic Standard. Wind. Wind Load Path. IBC Section 1604.

Lateral load basics Code acceptance of Standard. Standard Overview 2008 Wind & Seismic Standard. Wind. Wind Load Path. IBC Section 1604. Outline 2005/2008 Special Design Provisions for Wind & Seismic Standard Lateral load basics Code acceptance of Standard 2005/2008 Wind & Seismic Standard Overview 2008 Wind & Seismic Standard John Buddy

More information

Snow load design using the 2003 International Building Code

Snow load design using the 2003 International Building Code Snow load design using the 2003 International Building Code By John R. Henry, P.E. Early model building codes transcribed design provisions from various sources and standards. More recent editions of the

More information

Individual Truss Marking Is it a Building Code Requirement?

Individual Truss Marking Is it a Building Code Requirement? Introduction: Individual Truss Marking Is it a Building Code Requirement? Released April 1, 2010 On January 1, 2008, the 2007 edition of the California Building Code (CBC) 1 was adopted for use and replaced

More information

Heel Blocking Requirements and Capacity Analysis. Overview Revised 3/22/2017

Heel Blocking Requirements and Capacity Analysis. Overview Revised 3/22/2017 Heel Blocking Requirements and Capacity Analysis Overview Revised 3/22/2017 SBCA has been the voice of the structural building components industry since 1983, providing educational programs and technical

More information

Case Study: Failure at an Abutting Lower Roof due to Snowdrift

Case Study: Failure at an Abutting Lower Roof due to Snowdrift Case Study: Failure at an Abutting Lower Roof due to Snowdrift Jed B. Larsen, M.E., A.M.ASCE 1 Marco A. DeLeon, M.E., P.E., M.ASCE 2 Deepak Ahuja, M.S., P.E., M.ASCE 3 1 Nelson Architectural Engineers,

More information

December 20, 2006 PARTIES INTERESTED IN EVALUATION REPORTS ON PATIO COVERS

December 20, 2006 PARTIES INTERESTED IN EVALUATION REPORTS ON PATIO COVERS ICC EVALUATION SERVICE, INC. Evaluate P Inform P Protect December 20, 2006 TO: PARTIES INTERESTED IN EVALUATION REPORTS ON PATIO COVERS SUBJECT: Proposed Revisions to the Acceptance Criteria for Patio

More information

Technical Assignment 1 10/8/03

Technical Assignment 1 10/8/03 Executive Summary Technical Assignment 1 10/8/03 The is 55 story high-rise condominium being built off the northern Miami coast. The structural design presented in this building is a direct result of its

More information

3.5 Tier 1 Analysis Overview Seismic Shear Forces

3.5 Tier 1 Analysis Overview Seismic Shear Forces Chapter 3.0 - Screening Phase (Tier ) 3.5 Tier Analysis 3.5. Overview Analyses performed as part of Tier of the Evaluation Process are limited to Quick Checks. Quick Checks shall be used to calculate the

More information

Structural Redesign Gravity System

Structural Redesign Gravity System Redesign Gravity System Design Considerations A composite floor system was used for this design to maximize the efficiency of the material being used. This type of system requires less material and provides

More information

2010 Edition of ASCE 7 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures Errata No.2 Effective: March 31, Chapter 4

2010 Edition of ASCE 7 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures Errata No.2 Effective: March 31, Chapter 4 Edition of ASCE 7 Errata No.2 Effective: March 31, 13 This document contains errata to ASCE 7- and is periodically updated and posted on the SEI website at www.asce.org/sei/errata. THIS TYPE AND SIZE FONT

More information

Comparative study of wind tunnel test results to international and Egyptian design codes

Comparative study of wind tunnel test results to international and Egyptian design codes Comparative study of wind tunnel test results to international and Egyptian design codes *Chang- Abdulmonem A. Badri 1), *Manar M. Hussein 2) and Walid A. Attia 3) 1), 2), 3) 1 Department of Structural

More information

WIND SPEED AND DESIGN CRITERIA FOR FLEXIBLE FACE SIGNS CONSTRUCTED OF ABC EXTRUSIONS

WIND SPEED AND DESIGN CRITERIA FOR FLEXIBLE FACE SIGNS CONSTRUCTED OF ABC EXTRUSIONS WIND SPEED AND DESIGN CRITERIA FOR FLEXIBLE FACE SIGNS CONSTRUCTED OF ABC EXTRUSIONS 2005 EDITION This edition is based upon ASCE 7-98 recommendations for wind speed and wind loads. These have changed

More information

DESIGN & ENGINEERING GUIDE

DESIGN & ENGINEERING GUIDE DESIGN & ENGINEERING GUIDE SOLARMOUNT: FLUSH-TO-ROOF DESIGN PUB2017MAR16 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Getting Started Introduction 1 Installer Responsibility 2 Design Methodology 3 Project Requirements

More information

Presents: Wind Loads on Signs 2005 According to ASCE 7able of Contents

Presents: Wind Loads on Signs 2005 According to ASCE 7able of Contents Presents: Wind Loads on Signs 2005 According to ASCE 7able of Contents Chapter I: Introduction 1.1 Introduction...1 1.2 Features...1 Chapter II: Getting Started 2.1 Opening Wind Loads on Signs 2005...3

More information

APPENDIX. WOOD JOIST/RAFTER MAXIMUM SPANS ( for 16 o.c. spacing) WITH SINGLE ROW OF PV PANELS AT MIDSPAN (ft.) AND PANEL SUPPORT AT 32 o.c.

APPENDIX. WOOD JOIST/RAFTER MAXIMUM SPANS ( for 16 o.c. spacing) WITH SINGLE ROW OF PV PANELS AT MIDSPAN (ft.) AND PANEL SUPPORT AT 32 o.c. 1 Span Tables The following Wood Joist/Rafter Maximum Span Tables can be used to determine the adequacy of an existing wood framed roof structure to support the additional dead load created by PV panel

More information

REINFORCING TABLES INSTALLATION MANUAL

REINFORCING TABLES INSTALLATION MANUAL REINFORCING TABLES 201 REINFORCING TABLES Design Limitations Introduction The structural wall reinforcing and lintel design tables contained within the Appendix of NUDURA s Installation Manual have been

More information

Part III Building Planning and Construction

Part III Building Planning and Construction Part III Building Planning and Construction CHAPTER 3 BUILDING PLANNING SECTION R301 DESIGN CRITERIA R301.1 Application. Buildings and structures, and all parts thereof, shall be constructed to safely

More information

4.2 Tier 2 Analysis General Analysis Procedures for LSP & LDP

4.2 Tier 2 Analysis General Analysis Procedures for LSP & LDP 4.2 Tier 2 Analysis 4.2.1 General Four analysis procedures are provided in this section: Linear Static Procedure (LSP), Linear Dynamic Procedure (LDP), Special Procedure, and Procedure for Nonstructural

More information

Shear Wall Design Examples per 2015 WFCM and 2015 SDPWS

Shear Wall Design Examples per 2015 WFCM and 2015 SDPWS Shear Wall Design Examples per 2015 WFCM and 2015 SDPWS Copyright Materials This presentation is protected by US and International Copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, display and use of the presentation

More information

How IBC-2009 seismic and wind loading standards apply to emergency standby power systems

How IBC-2009 seismic and wind loading standards apply to emergency standby power systems TECHNICAL ARTICLE How IBC-2009 seismic and wind loading standards apply to emergency standby power systems Understanding provisions in the latest edition of the International Building Code is critical

More information

What is Conventional Construction?

What is Conventional Construction? What is Conventional Construction? Copyright This presentation is protected by US and International Copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, display and use of the presentation without written permission

More information

SWH Solar Racking Installation Guide

SWH Solar Racking Installation Guide Version 15.01.v1 SWH Solar Racking Installation Guide Table of Contents i. Installer s Responsibilities... 3 Part I. Procedure to Determine the Design Wind Load... 4 [1.1] Using the Low Rise Buildings

More information

Association of Caribbean States 2003

Association of Caribbean States 2003 MODEL BUILDING CODE FOR WIND LOADS Final Version, May 2003 Association of Caribbean States 2003 5-7 Sweet Briar Road, St. Clair, P.O. Box 660 Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, West Indies Tel: (868)

More information

Part III Building Planning and Construction

Part III Building Planning and Construction Part III Building Planning and Construction CHAPTER 3 BUILDING PLANNING SECTION R301 DESIGN CRITERIA R301.1 Application. Buildings and structures, and all parts thereof, shall be constructed to safely

More information

Figure 1 Shear wall segments with mono-sloped top plates

Figure 1 Shear wall segments with mono-sloped top plates All text, images and diagrams Copyright 2004 by Thor Matteson and ICC APPENDIX B ENGINEERING PRINCIPLES OF SHEAR WALLS WITH SLOPING TOP PLATES APA The Engineered Wood Association and others have tested

More information

SUMMARY OF UF 2004 HURRICANES BUILDING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND ARA WIND-BORNE DEBRIS CRITERIA FOR THE PANHANDLE STUDY

SUMMARY OF UF 2004 HURRICANES BUILDING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND ARA WIND-BORNE DEBRIS CRITERIA FOR THE PANHANDLE STUDY SUMMARY OF UF 2004 HURRICANES BUILDING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND ARA WIND-BORNE DEBRIS CRITERIA FOR THE PANHANDLE STUDY The question to be resolved by the Florida Building Commission is whether wind-borne

More information

SWH Solar Racking Installation Guide

SWH Solar Racking Installation Guide Version 13.02.v1 SWH Solar Racking Installation Guide Table of Contents i. Installer s Responsibilities... 3 Part I. Procedure to Determine the Design Wind Load... 4 [1.1] Using the Low Rise Buildings

More information

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MOMENT RESISTING MIDWALL BY THE STEEL NETWORK, INC.

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MOMENT RESISTING MIDWALL BY THE STEEL NETWORK, INC. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MOMENT RESISTING MIDWALL BY THE STEEL NETWORK, INC. Paul Lackey, P.E., Muhammad Ghoraba, Nabil A. Rahman, Ph.D., P.E. and Kurtis Kennedy MidWall is a hold-down product intended to

More information

SEISMIC PROVISIONS OF IBC 2006 AND ASCE 7-05

SEISMIC PROVISIONS OF IBC 2006 AND ASCE 7-05 Introduction This paper is meant for people studying for the ARE. Engineers and professors may not like the way some of the ideas are presented. They are meant to help understand the concepts and impacts

More information

Classification of Tower Structures per ANSI/TIA-222-G, White Paper

Classification of Tower Structures per ANSI/TIA-222-G, White Paper Classification of Tower Structures per ANSI/TIA-222-G, IBC and ASCE-7 White Paper Authored by: William Garrett, PE, SECB Bryan Lanier, PE, SE May 2017 Preface Application of ANSI/TIA-222-G structure classes

More information

WIND & SEISMIC 2008 EDITION ASD/LRFD WITH COMMENTARY. American Forest & Paper Association. American Wood Council ANSI/AF&PA SDPWS-2008

WIND & SEISMIC 2008 EDITION ASD/LRFD WITH COMMENTARY. American Forest & Paper Association. American Wood Council ANSI/AF&PA SDPWS-2008 2008 EDITION ANSI/AF&PA SDPWS-2008 Approval Date: August 4, 2008 ASD/LRFD WIND & SEISMIC Special Design Provisions for Wind and Seismic WITH COMMENTARY American Forest & Paper Association American Wood

More information

REPORT HOLDER: AEROSMITH FASTENING SYSTEMS 5621 DIVIDEND ROAD INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA EVALUATION SUBJECT: AEROSMITH BRAND FASTENERS

REPORT HOLDER: AEROSMITH FASTENING SYSTEMS 5621 DIVIDEND ROAD INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA EVALUATION SUBJECT: AEROSMITH BRAND FASTENERS 0 Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ICC-ES Report ICC-ES 000 (800) 423-6587 (562) 699-0543 www.icc-es.org ESR-3145 Reissued 02/2017 This report is subject to renewal 02/2018. DIVISION: 05 00 00 METALS SECTION:

More information

COMPARATIVE REPORT CYPECAD VS. ETABS

COMPARATIVE REPORT CYPECAD VS. ETABS COMPARATIVE REPORT CYPECAD VS. ETABS Contents SIMPLE FRAME EXAMPLE... 3 1. Introduction... 4 2. Dimensions and applied loads... 4 3. Materials and applied design code... 5 4. Nodes... 7 5. Moment and shear

More information

2012 Wood Frame Construction Manual: Wind Load Distribution on Buildings Load Paths

2012 Wood Frame Construction Manual: Wind Load Distribution on Buildings Load Paths 2012 Wood Frame Construction Manual: Wind Load Distribution on Buildings Load Paths Presented by: William L. Coulbourne, PE Copyright Materials This presentation is protected by US and International Copyright

More information

2. Does not require, involve or include any additions to, or repair or modification of, the existing foundation.

2. Does not require, involve or include any additions to, or repair or modification of, the existing foundation. SECTION 3109 STRUCTURES SEAWARD OF A COASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINE 3109.1 General. The provisions of this section shall apply to the design and construction of habitable structures, and substantial

More information

Massachusetts General Hospital - Building for the Third Century Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design

Massachusetts General Hospital - Building for the Third Century Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design Massachusetts General Hospital - Building for the Third Century Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design 55 Fruit Street 02114 The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering

More information

NATIONAL HARBOR BUILDING M OXON HILL, MARYLAND. Ryan Sarazen Structural Option Technical Report 3 Faculty Consultant: Dr.

NATIONAL HARBOR BUILDING M OXON HILL, MARYLAND. Ryan Sarazen Structural Option Technical Report 3 Faculty Consultant: Dr. NATIONAL HARBOR BUILDING M OXON HILL, MARYLAND Ryan Sarazen Structural Option Technical Report 3 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Andres Lepage Table of Contents Executive Summary.. 3 Structural Systems Overview...

More information

R. J. McNamara, S.E.

R. J. McNamara, S.E. USE OF MOTION AMPLIFICATION DEVICES AND FLUID DAMPERS TO REDUCE THE WIND INDUCED RESPONSE OF TALL BUILDINGS by R. J. McNamara, S.E. McNamara/Salvia, Inc. Boston, MA 02110 USE OF MOTION AMPLIFICATION DEVICES

More information

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: EPIC METALS CORPORATION 11 TALBOT AVENUE RANKIN, PENNSYLVANIA 15104

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: EPIC METALS CORPORATION 11 TALBOT AVENUE RANKIN, PENNSYLVANIA 15104 0 Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ICC ES Evaluation Report ICC ES 000 (800) 423 6587 (562) 699 0543 www.icc es.org ESR 2047 Reissued 07/207 This report is subject to renewal 07/209. DIVISION: 05 00 00

More information

Mitigating wind and flood: The increased wind vulnerability of static elevation vs. amphibious retrofit

Mitigating wind and flood: The increased wind vulnerability of static elevation vs. amphibious retrofit 8 th International Colloquium on Bluff Body Aerodynamics and Applications Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA June 7-11, 2016 BBAA VIII Mitigating wind and flood: The increased wind vulnerability

More information

CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE

CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STEEL JOISTS AND JOIST GIRDERS SECTION 1. GENERAL 1.1 SCOPE Adopted by the Steel Joist Institute April 7, 1931 Revised to Nov. 10, 2014 - Effective Jan.1, 2015 The practices

More information

IBC 2006 & ASCE 7-05 Structural Provisions. Martin Johnson, SE & Todd Erickson, SE June 14, 2007

IBC 2006 & ASCE 7-05 Structural Provisions. Martin Johnson, SE & Todd Erickson, SE June 14, 2007 IBC 2006 & ASCE 7-05 Structural Provisions Martin Johnson, SE & Todd Erickson, SE June 14, 2007 Schedule of Adoption 2006 IBC, ASCE 7-05 and material standard documents are available now. 2007 CBC will

More information

Structural Technical Report 3 Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design

Structural Technical Report 3 Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design Structural Technical Report 3 Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design James Wilson Structural Option AE 481W Senior Thesis The Pennsylvania State University Faculty Consultant: Professor M. Kevin

More information

Loads and Load Paths. "Architecture is inhabited sculpture." -Constantin Brancusi

Loads and Load Paths. Architecture is inhabited sculpture. -Constantin Brancusi Loads and Load Paths "Architecture is inhabited sculpture." -Constantin Brancusi Loads and Load Paths Structural Design Design Loads Dead Load Live Load Snow Load Lateral Loads Load Types Load Combinations

More information

Exhibit IV Information on the History of Building Code Adoptions by the Counties and Resulting Variances in Design and Construction Standards Gary Chock Structural Engineers Association of Hawaii December

More information

Structural Engineering

Structural Engineering Structural Engineering 4 4.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.1 General Approach 115 Submission Requirements 4.2 Codes and Standards 116 Structural Design of New Buildings 116 Use of Recycled Materials 4.3 Structural

More information

Understanding Wind Uplift Ratings

Understanding Wind Uplift Ratings Page 1 of 5 Home Understanding Wind Uplift Ratings By Stan Choiniere September 1, 2006 What is an FM Approvals wind test, and what do the various wind uplift ratings mean? This question is frequently asked,

More information

Common Errors in Truss Design

Common Errors in Truss Design In today s competitive world of trusses, component manufacturers are always looking for ways to generate more efficient truss designs. Occasionally, truss designs need to be changed in order to be sealed

More information

SJI Code of Standard Practice

SJI Code of Standard Practice Standard Practice CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STEEL JOISTS AND JOIST GIRDERS SECTION 1 GENERAL 1.1 SCOPE Adopted by the Steel Joist Institute April 7, 1931 Revised to May 18, 2010 - Effective December

More information

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report Michael A. Troxell Structural Option Advisor: Professor Parfitt College of Business Administration Oct. 5, 2005 Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report

More information

Wall Bracing. Part 1: Basic Components for Code Compliant Bracing

Wall Bracing. Part 1: Basic Components for Code Compliant Bracing The Pennsylvania Housing Research/Resource Center Wall Bracing. Part 1: Basic Components for Code Compliant Bracing Builder Brief: BB0807 Bo Kasal, Hankin Chair, Director of Research PHRC, and Jay Crandell,

More information

SDPWS. Special Design Provisions for Wind & Seismic 2015 EDITION

SDPWS. Special Design Provisions for Wind & Seismic 2015 EDITION SDPWS Special Design Provisions for Wind & Seismic 2015 EDITION ANSI/AWC SDPWS-2015 Approval date September 8, 2014 Updates and Errata While every precaution has been taken to ensure the accuracy of this

More information

EARTHQUAKE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS OF BUILDINGS. By Ir. Heng Tang Hai

EARTHQUAKE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS OF BUILDINGS. By Ir. Heng Tang Hai EARTHQUAKE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS OF BUILDINGS By Ir. Heng Tang Hai SYPNOSIS 1. Earthquake-Induced Motions 2. Building Configurations 3. Effectiveness Of Shear Walls 4. Enhancement Of Ductility In Buildings

More information

June 7, 2016 request for formal interpretation of Section 2.3 (Combining Factored Loads Using Strength Design) of ASCE/SEI 7-10.

June 7, 2016 request for formal interpretation of Section 2.3 (Combining Factored Loads Using Strength Design) of ASCE/SEI 7-10. June 7, 2016 request for formal interpretation of Section 2.3 (Combining Factored Loads Using Strength Design) of ASCE/SEI 7-10. Contents p.1 Request for Interpretation p.3 Proposed response (August 5,

More information

DESIGN OF HIGH-RISE CORE-WALL BUILDINGS: A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE

DESIGN OF HIGH-RISE CORE-WALL BUILDINGS: A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE DESIGN OF HIGH-RISE CORE-WALL BUILDINGS: A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE Perry Adebar Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Email: adebar@civil.ubc.ca ABSTRACT

More information

Lateral Design of Mid- Rise Wood Structures

Lateral Design of Mid- Rise Wood Structures Lateral Design of Mid- Rise Wood Structures Presented by Ricky McLain, MS, PE, SE Technical Director WoodWorks Texas Workshops December, 2016 Insert picture of me graduating college Follow the load Following

More information

SECTION PLATE CONNECTED WOOD TRUSSES

SECTION PLATE CONNECTED WOOD TRUSSES SECTION 06173 PLATE CONNECTED WOOD TRUSSES PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Shop fabricated wood trusses for roof and floor framing. 2. Bridging, bracing, and anchorage. B. Related Sections:

More information

R Code and Commentary for 2012 NC Residential Code final 03/06/13

R Code and Commentary for 2012 NC Residential Code final 03/06/13 R602.10 Code and Commentary for 2012 NC Residential Code final 03/06/13 Commentary italicized and printed in red 1. Section R602.10 -- provides charging language for two simplified bracing approaches (isolated

More information

ROOFING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) No. 102(A)-95

ROOFING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) No. 102(A)-95 ROOFING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) No. 102(A)-95 TEST PROCEDURE FOR STATIC UPLIFT RESISTANCE OF MECHANICALLY ATTACHED, CLIPPED, RIGID, ROOF SYSTEMS (For Methods of Mechanical Attachment Excluding Clips,

More information

CHAPTER 8 THE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF MULTI-STORY BUILDINGS WITH LARGE MOMENT END-PLATE CONNECTIONS 8.1 INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 8 THE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF MULTI-STORY BUILDINGS WITH LARGE MOMENT END-PLATE CONNECTIONS 8.1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 8 THE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF MULTI-STORY BUILDINGS WITH LARGE MOMENT END-PLATE CONNECTIONS 8.1 INTRODUCTION According to the AISC Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings (1997), steel

More information

Span Length Effect on Seismic Demand on Column Splices in Steel Moment Resisting Frames

Span Length Effect on Seismic Demand on Column Splices in Steel Moment Resisting Frames Span Length Effect on Seismic Demand on Column Splices in Steel Moment Resisting Frames B. Akbas Gebze Institute of Technology, Turkey Blank Line 9 pt O. Seker Yildiz Technical University, Turkey Blank

More information

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 4, Issue 10, 2016 ISSN (online):

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 4, Issue 10, 2016 ISSN (online): IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 4, Issue 10, 2016 ISSN (online): 2321-0613 Seismic Response of Tall Irregular Buildings under Influence of Torsion Lohith Kumar

More information

Ordinance No July 1, 2016

Ordinance No July 1, 2016 (Insert Facing Page 3 IRC) 2.02.540 Amendment to IRC Section R105.2 Work Exempt From Permit, Building and Electrical Sections. The following additional exception shall be added to R105.2 Building: Building:

More information

Significant 2012 IBC, NDS and 2008 SDPWS Changes

Significant 2012 IBC, NDS and 2008 SDPWS Changes Significant 2012 IBC, NDS and 2008 SDPWS Changes Speaker s Name Title American Wood Council Engineered and Traditional Wood Framing Members Copyright Materials This presentation is protected by US and

More information

130 MPH EXPOSURE B WFCM GUIDE. Guide to Wood Frame Construction in High Wind Areas for One- and Two-Family Dwellings 2015 EDITION

130 MPH EXPOSURE B WFCM GUIDE. Guide to Wood Frame Construction in High Wind Areas for One- and Two-Family Dwellings 2015 EDITION 130 MPH EXPOSURE B WFCM GUIDE Guide to Wood Frame Construction in High Wind Areas for One- and Two-Family Dwellings 2015 EDITION Updates and Errata While every precaution has been taken to ensure the accuracy

More information

LATERAL DRIFT DESIGN IN COLD FORMED STEEL WALL SYSTEMS

LATERAL DRIFT DESIGN IN COLD FORMED STEEL WALL SYSTEMS 1 LATERAL DRIFT DESIGN IN COLD FORMED STEEL WALL SYSTEMS Thomas Castle, S.E. 2 This presentation is published by the Cold-Formed Steel Engineers Institute ( CFSEI ). The information herein shall not constitute

More information

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PREPAREDNESS AND ASSISTANCE TRUST FUND ARC 4496 Evaluation Questionnaire

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PREPAREDNESS AND ASSISTANCE TRUST FUND ARC 4496 Evaluation Questionnaire EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PREPAREDNESS AND ASSISTANCE TRUST FUND ARC 4496 Evaluation Questionnaire Additional Instructions and Clarifications 1. Please review ARC 4496 before beginning the project identification

More information

Global Village Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, New York

Global Village Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, New York Presentation Outline Welcome Introduction Architecture Existing Structure Problem Statement Arch. Breadth Structural Depth Conclusion Questions Global Village Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester,

More information

General Structural Concerns

General Structural Concerns 1/28 General Structural Concerns Functionality / Stiffness deformations Stability equilibrium Strength material behaviour 2/28 Stability Loads act on structure tend to destabilise structure also tend to

More information

Guide to Attaching Exterior Wall Coverings through Foam Sheathing to Wood or Steel Wall Framing

Guide to Attaching Exterior Wall Coverings through Foam Sheathing to Wood or Steel Wall Framing Guide to Attaching Exterior Wall Coverings through Foam Sheathing to Wood or Wall Framing Released September 20, 2010 Updated December 4, 2012 Note: Tables for cladding attachments to wood framing have

More information

CBUCK Engineering. Evaluation Report Englert Series 500 Metal Roof Assembly Manufacturer: Englert, Inc Amboy Avenue Perth Amboy, NJ

CBUCK Engineering. Evaluation Report Englert Series 500 Metal Roof Assembly Manufacturer: Englert, Inc Amboy Avenue Perth Amboy, NJ Evaluation Report Englert Series 500 Metal Roof Assembly Manufacturer: 1200 Amboy Avenue Perth Amboy, NJ 08862 for Florida Product Approval # FL 11698.2 R3 Florida Building Code 5th Edition (2014) Method:

More information

CE 3150 Reinforced Concrete Design Design Project

CE 3150 Reinforced Concrete Design Design Project Problem Description For this design project you will work in your project groups to complete a partial design of an office building. Specifically, you will design and fully detail three components: 1.

More information

Diaphragms 2. Design Process. Design Process. Diaphragms are the roofs and floors of the upper stories

Diaphragms 2. Design Process. Design Process. Diaphragms are the roofs and floors of the upper stories Diaphragms 2 Design Process Diaphragms are the roofs and floors of the upper stories They are assumed to act as a beam (usually a deep beam with substantial shear deformation) Design Process Sheathing

More information

USING WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS FOR SHEAR AND WIND UPLIFT APPLICATIONS

USING WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS FOR SHEAR AND WIND UPLIFT APPLICATIONS USING WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS FOR SHEAR AND WIND UPLIFT APPLICATIONS Borjen Yeh 1 and Ed Keith 2 ABSTRACT: Shearwalls constructed with wood structural panels, such as plywood and oriented strand board (OSB),

More information

MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER

MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION THE PENNSLYVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING PRESENTATION OUTLINE INTRODUCTION BUILDING DESCRIPTION EXISTING

More information

DESIGN CRITERIA. Allowable Stress Design (ASD) AISC-1999.

DESIGN CRITERIA. Allowable Stress Design (ASD) AISC-1999. DESIGN CRITERIA 1. INTRODUCTION This appendix summarizes the codes, standards, criteria, and practices that are generally used in the design and construction structural engineering system for the Sarker

More information

Handout. ICC-NSSA Storm Shelters. Presenter. ICC NSSA Storm Shelters Webinar. International Code Council 1. Ernst W. Kiesling, P.E.

Handout. ICC-NSSA Storm Shelters. Presenter. ICC NSSA Storm Shelters Webinar. International Code Council 1. Ernst W. Kiesling, P.E. 1 If you need assistance please contact us at 1-888-ICC-SAFE (422-7233), extension 33818 IMPORTANT NOTICE: This Adobe Connect service includes a feature that allows audio and any documents and other materials

More information

Sponsored by The Boston Association of Structural Engineers and the Structural Engineers Association of Massachusetts

Sponsored by The Boston Association of Structural Engineers and the Structural Engineers Association of Massachusetts Commonwealth of Massachusetts State Building Code 780-CMR 9 th Edition Renovation of Existing Buildings Using The International Existing Building Code IEBC 2015 with Massachusetts Amendments Sponsored

More information

Technical Notes 39A - Testing for Engineered Brick Masonry - Determination of Allowable Design Stresses [July/Aug. 1981] (Reissued December 1987)

Technical Notes 39A - Testing for Engineered Brick Masonry - Determination of Allowable Design Stresses [July/Aug. 1981] (Reissued December 1987) Technical Notes 39A - Testing for Engineered Brick Masonry - Determination of Allowable Design Stresses [July/Aug. 1981] (Reissued December 1987) INTRODUCTION Prior to the development of a rational design

More information

2018 APPENDIX B BUILDING CODE SUMMARY FOR ALL COMMERCIAL PROJECTS (EXCEPT 1 AND 2-FAMILY DWELLINGS AND TOWNHOUSES)

2018 APPENDIX B BUILDING CODE SUMMARY FOR ALL COMMERCIAL PROJECTS (EXCEPT 1 AND 2-FAMILY DWELLINGS AND TOWNHOUSES) 2018 APPENDIX B BUILDING CODE SUMMARY FOR ALL COMMERCIAL PROJECTS (EXCEPT 1 AND 2-FAMILY DWELLINGS AND TOWNHOUSES) (Reproduce the following data on the building plans sheet 1 or 2) Name of Project: Address:

More information

This point intends to acquaint the reader with some of the basic concepts of the earthquake engineer:

This point intends to acquaint the reader with some of the basic concepts of the earthquake engineer: Chapter II. REVIEW OF PREVIOUS RESEARCH II.1. Introduction: The purpose of this chapter is to review first the basic concepts for earthquake engineering. It is not intended to review the basic concepts

More information

T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T 3

T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T 3 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T 3 The New York City Bus Depot New York, NY Kaitlyn Triebl Structural Option Advisor: Kevin Parfitt November 16, 2011 T e c h n i c a l R e p o r t 3 N o v e m b e r 1 6, 2

More information

International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 1, Pages , July 2011

International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 1, Pages , July 2011 International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 1, Pages 111-120, July 2011 Archive of SID Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch Published online July 2011 at (http://journals.azad.ac.ir/ijase)

More information

Significant 2012 IBC, NDS and 2008 SDPWS Changes

Significant 2012 IBC, NDS and 2008 SDPWS Changes www.awc.org Engineered and Traditional Wood Framing Members Significant 2012 IBC, NDS and 2008 SDPWS Changes www.awc.org Presented by: Michelle Kam-Biron, PE, SE, SECB American Wood Council - Director

More information

LPI 56 Technical Guide

LPI 56 Technical Guide LPI 56 Technical Guide Floor & Roof Applications Product Specifications & Design Values 2 Floor Tables 3 Uniform Floor Load (PLF) Tables: Simple s 4 Uniform Floor Load (PLF) Tables: Continuous s 5 Uniform

More information

AISC Live Webinar. for joining our live webinar today. Need We will Help? begin shortly. Please standby. AISC Live Webinars

AISC Live Webinar. for joining our live webinar today. Need We will Help? begin shortly. Please standby. AISC Live Webinars AISC Live Webinars Thank you for joining our live webinar today. We will begin shortly. Please standby. AISC Live Webinars Thank you. for joining our live webinar today. Need We will Help? begin shortly.

More information

CURRENT TSUNAMI DESIGN GUIDANCE IN THE UNITED STATES - FEMA P-646

CURRENT TSUNAMI DESIGN GUIDANCE IN THE UNITED STATES - FEMA P-646 Abstract CURRENT TSUNAMI DESIGN GUIDANCE IN THE UNITED STATES - FEMA P-646 Ian N. Robertson, Ph.D., S.E. Professor, University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu, Hawaii / USA The use of engineered structures

More information

Performance-Based Design of Wood Shearwalls Considering Performance of the Overall Structure

Performance-Based Design of Wood Shearwalls Considering Performance of the Overall Structure Performance-Based Design of Wood Shearwalls Considering Performance of the Overall Structure David V. Rosowsky Ph.D. (99), Johns Hopkins University Richardson Chair in Wood Engineering Professor of Civil

More information