Tom Key, EPRI

Transcription

1 Panel: Valuing Existing and Developing New Pumped Storage Assets in the West Northwest Hydroelectric Association 010 Winter Meeting February 17, 010 Tom Key, EPRI

2 DOE-Industry Project: Quantifying the Full Value of Hydropower in the Transmission Grid Funded through DOE FOA DE , Advanced Water Power Topic Area 4: Hydropower Grid Services $.M, over yrs with $640k needed Industry cost share

3 Quantifying the Full Value of Hydropower in the Transmission Grid Objective: Methods to value grid services from hydropower Participants: EPRI, HDR-DTA, HPPi, LCG Consulting, ORNL, Sandia, Brendan Kirby and Cascade Consulting Scope of Work (starting February 010, see timeline slide): Conduct industry case studies and evaluate hydropower participation in ancillary services markets Prepare detailed simulation for WECC area and determine effects of alternative policies on value of hydropower Analyze systemic operating constraints on hydropower resources Develop data base of current and future hydro plant costs Deliver effective methodology for planning and applying hydropower assets to support integration of variable generation

4 Project Team DOE Technical Program Manager Alejandro.Moreno DOE Contracts Manager EPRI Project Manager Thomas Key EPRI Contracts Manager Mr. David Morrison Principal Investigator Daniel Brooks, EPRI Grid Modeling and Studies LCG Consulting Dr Rajat Deb Sidart Deb Dr Carol Cheng Dr Hossein Daneshi Cascade Consulting Dr Alberto Del Rosso Principal Investigator Patrick March, HPPI Hydropower Operations, Cost and Markets HDR DTA David Grady Robert Rittase Steve Brown Brendan Kirby, Consulting DOE FFRDC Support ORNL Hydrologic Constraints Dr. Brennan Smith Dr. Michael R. Starke SNLA Grids and Markets Dr. Abraham Ellis Dr. Verne Loose Dr. Mark Ehlen 4

5 Industry Coordination National Hydro Association (NHA) Hydraulic Power Committee (Oct 009) NWHA (February 17th) Pumped Storage Council (Feb 18) NHA Annual Meeting (April 6 th ) HydroVision (Charlotte week of July 6 th ) Wind, energy storage and hydropower groups FERC and Independent System Operators (ISOs) Other key organizations Power Management Agencies, Bureau of Reclamation, Army Corps of Engineers 5

6 Proposed Study Timeline PROJECT GANTT CHART CONTRACT START Month 1-1 Month 1-4 TASK 1: Prepare Industry Case Studies 1a 1b 1c TASK : Establish Wide-Area Modeling Approach and Foundational Scenario a b Typical Task Deliverable TASK : Evaluate National Hydropower Participation in Ancillary Services Markets TASK 4: Analyze Systemic Operating Constraints on Hydropower Resources a b c d 4a 4b 4c TASK 5: Develop Data Base of Current and Projected Cost Elements for Development Options 5a 5b 5c 5d TASK 6: Develop and Compute Scenario Simulations for WECC Projects 6a 6b TASK 7: Determine Effects of Alternative Policy Scenarios on Value of Hydropower TASK 8: Define New Methodology for Planning and Applying Hydropower Assets 7a 8a 7b 8b TASK 9: Documentation and Dissemination of Results (See Project Milestones/Deliverables) PROJECT MILESTONES/DELIVERABLES Project Review Meetings Industry Review Meetings Final Report Final Briefing Draft Final 6

7 Task 1: Looking for Industry Participants for Grid Services Case Studies such as: Market/Region Project Project Type Owner NEISO Northfield FirstLight NYISO Blenheim-Gilboa New York Power Authority PJM PJM Conowingo Muddy Run Conventional Exelon Generation Exelon Generation SERC SERC Raccoon Mountain Bad Creek Tennessee Valley Authority Duke MISO MISO Osage Taum Sauk Conventional AmerenUE AmerenUE CAISO CAISO Helms Castaic PG&E LADWP/CDWR Pacific NW Pacific NW Rocky Reach Grand Coulee Conventional Conv. + P-S Chelan County PUD USBR (BPA) CONFIRMED UNCONFIRMED Please Contact: Tom Key, , tkey@epri.com or Pat March, , pamarch@hydroppi.com 7

8 Unit Efficiency (%) Plant Efficiency (%) Optimized Plant Efficiency (%) Energy (MWh) Unit Power (MW) Optimized Plant Efficiency (%) Detailed Performance Analyses Optimized Unit Efficiency Plant vs Efficiency Unit Power vs Power Efficiencies and Load vs Time Energy Production vs Power, GH = 1180 Actual Plant Efficiency Optimized Plant Efficiency ActUnitPower1 ActUnitPower ActUnitPower ActUnitPower4 ActUnitPower5 ActUnitPower6 ActUnitPower7 ActUnitPower8 95 OptUnitPower1 OptUnitPower OptUnitPower OptUnitPower4 OptUnitPower5 OptUnitPower6 OptUnitPower7 OptUnitPower GH = 1140 GH = 100 GH = Energy (MWh) 40 Optimized Plant Efficiency GH = GH = GH = GH = 140 GH = /1/ :45 01/1/09 10:5 01/1/09 10:59 01/1/09 11:07 01/1/09 11:14 01/1/09 11: Time Scroll 0 Data ' Power (MW) X-Axis Scale ' 80 Plant Power (MW) Power (MW) 8

9 Supplemental Project Notice Draft project notice 9