Response to Comments of Don and Tricia Nevis (Letter I25) See the master response to Public Outreach Process.
|
|
- Irene Sparks
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2
3 Freeport Regional Water Authority and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Chapter 8. Responses to Comments from Individuals Don and Tricia Nevis (I25) Response to Comments of Don and Tricia Nevis (Letter I25) I25-1. I25-2. I25-3. I25-4. I25-5. I25-6. See the master response to Public Outreach Process. Figure 2-1 in the final EIR/EIS shows the general location of the proposed intake facility in relation to residences. See the master response to Public Outreach Process. The commentor s concurrence with comment letter Sp08 from the South Pocket Homeowner s Association is noted. Freeport Regional Water Project 8-76 March 2004 J&S
4
5
6 Freeport Regional Water Authority and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Chapter 8. Responses to Comments from Individuals Jamie and Guy Ramsey (I26 Response to Comments of Jamie and Guy Ramsey (Letter I26) I26-1. I26-2. I26-3. I26-4. I26-5. I26-6. The draft EIR/EIS fully disclosed the impacts on wildlife and wetlands habitat (Chapters 7 and 8). The potential environmental effects of the FRWP and alternatives on water supplies, and water quality are fully disclosed in chapters 3 and 4 of the draft EIR/EIS. Where significant environmental effects were identified, mitigation measures were identified to reduce such effects to less than significant levels, where feasible. The draft EIR/EIS relies on the best information and modeling tools available to conduct impact analyses. This modeling tool, CALSIM II, is the only available and accepted tool for such modeling and has been subjected to rigorous review and refinement. Reclamation and the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) developed this model and fully accept the results of the model. The FRWP modeling was conducted in close coordination with Reclamation and has been made publicly available. Reclamation and DWR have reviewed and accepted the results. CALSIM II results indicate the project would not cause significant water supply or quality impacts. In addition, all vehicles will be required to comply with the mitigation measures outlined in Chapter 13 of the draft EIR/EIS. Mitigation Measure 13-1 fully complies with the requirements of the Sacramento Metropolitan Air I26-7. I26-8. I26-9. I I Quality Management District (SMAQMD). The SMAQMD has reviewed the draft EIR/EIS (see letter L14) and found the analysis to be thorough and complete, as well as consistent with the latest procedures established by the district. FRWA is fully committed to implementing the stringent air quality requirements established by Mitigation Measure It is not feasible to specifically identify emission requirements. However, the requirements set forth in Mitigation Measure 13-1 require that heavy-duty off-road vehicles be much cleaner than average, which will generally require that the construction fleet be made up of newer vehicles that have modern emission systems. It should also be noted that most of the emissions identified in Impact 13-6 are related to truck traffic throughout the entire construction area. Only a relatively small portion of total emissions will be derived from off-road heavy construction equipment at the intake facility site. The Draft EIR/EIS does fully analyze the potential impacts of the project. Potential long-term air quality, fish, and noise impacts are described in the operationrelated impact sections of their respective chapters. The noise impacts are also discussed in the master response to Intake Facility Issues. In order to meet fish protection criteria, the approach velocities to the intake s fish screen will be approximately 0.2 ft/s. This low velocity will not pose a threat to recreational river users. Additionally, a debris Freeport Regional Water Project 8-79 March 2004 J&S
7 Freeport Regional Water Authority and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Chapter 8. Responses to Comments from Individuals Jamie and Guy Ramsey (I26 boom next to the intake will prevent large objects from getting close to the intake structure. I I I I I Chapter 8, Wildlife, of the Draft EIR/EIS thoroughly analyzes the potential wildlife impacts the FRWP may cause. Implementing the proposed mitigation measures will reduce the impacts to a less-than-significant level. Chapter 5, Fish, of the Draft EIR/EIS fully analyzes potential impacts on fish that the FRWP may cause. Significance criteria were applied to determine the severity of the potential impacts. The potential impacts are less-than-significant and no mitigation is required. This comment is accurate and the impact has been identified. However, Alternative 6 has not been selected as the preferred alternative in the Draft EIR/EIS. Freeport Regional Water Project 8-80 March 2004 J&S
8
9 Freeport Regional Water Authority and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Chapter 8. Responses to Comments from Individuals Maurice Roos (I27) Response to Comments of Maurice Roos (Letter I27) I27-1. Support for implementing the FRWP, and Alternative 5 and its associated intake location in particular, is noted. I27-2. I27-3. See the master response to the Intake Facility Issues. In the final EIR/EIS, FRWA commits to maintaining operational noise levels for the intake facility at or below existing background noise levels. Additionally, the intake facility will be designed to minimize visual impacts. I27-4. A conversion table is not included in the final EIR/EIS. Freeport Regional Water Project 8-82 March 2004 J&S
10
11 Freeport Regional Water Authority and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Chapter 8. Responses to Comments from Individuals Dorothy Carroll (I28 Responses to Comments of Dorothy Carroll (Letter I28) I28-1. See the response to Intake Facility Issues major issue in Chapter 3 of this document. Additionally, as described in Chapter 14, Noise of the draft EIR/EIS, construction noise in the vicinity of the intake facility will be substantially reduced with distance. While noise at neighboring residences will still be significant, it is not expected to cause hearing damage. As described in mitigation measure 14-1, FRWA s noise disturbance coordinator will ensure that reasonable measures are implemented to correct problems identified by residences. Freeport Regional Water Project 8-84 March 2004 J&S
12
13
14 Freeport Regional Water Authority and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Chapter 8. Responses to Comments from Individuals Leonor Alvarez (I29) Response to Comments of Leonor Alvarez (Letter I29) I29-1. I29-2. I29-3. As described in Chapter 2 of the draft EIR/EIS under Environmental Commitments, the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (page 2-45) and Channel and Levee Restoration Plan (page 2-48) will ensure that the project design protects the levee from any project induced erosion that might otherwise occur. The draft EIR/EIS fully discloses the risk of erosion and flooding. However, more detailed information will be provided to the State Reclamation Board during the final design stage in order to obtain an encroachment permit. That is a public process and all information will be available to the public at that time. SAFCA is typically invited by the Reclamation Board to comment on encroachment permits within their jurisdiction. FRWA is responsible for the cost of implementing the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and Channel and Levee Restoration Plan features associated with the FRWP. I29-6. I29-7. I29-8. I29-9. I I I typically reviews and comments on the technical aspects of encroachment permit applications. FRWA currently plans on using the existing access road to the intake site. Site access routes will be further refined during the final design stages but additional access routes are not planned at this time. The impacts described in the draft EIR/EIS are based on use of the existing access road. Chapter 13, Air Quality, of the draft EIR/EIS fully analyzes the effects of the project on Air Quality, including those caused by diesel engines. I29-4. I I29-5. The potential effects of vibration on surrounding structures is described in Chapter 14 of the draft EIR/EIS (page for example). Substantial vibration levels are very localized and are not expected to damage any structures, including the levee. In addition, the Reclamation Board will review the FRWP construction procedures, including vibratory effects, as a part of the encroachment permit process to ensure compliance with their standards. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers also I I I I See the master response to the Public Outreach Process. See the master response to the Public Outreach Process. Additionally, specific records of outreach efforts are available at the FRWA office. Freeport Regional Water Project 8-87 March 2004 J&S
15 Freeport Regional Water Authority and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Chapter 8. Responses to Comments from Individuals Leonor Alvarez (I29) I Electric power will be provided by existing power sources in the area. The amount of power required by the intake facility, and the associated electric transformers and switches, are typical in an urban area and do not pose an increased risk to area residents. agencies have a long history of securing, using, and protecting their high-quality sources of water. It is their intent to continue this practice, consistent with state and federal law and the applicable polices of their agencies (Volume 2, Appendix B, page 5-3 of the draft EIR/EIS). I As fully disclosed in the draft EIR/EIS (Chapters 13, 14, and 15 in particular), implementation of the FRWP is not likely to result in health-related problems for nearby residents or anyone else. Therefore, no compensation is needed. I I I I Consistent with CEQA and NEPA, impacts of a project are measured against existing conditions. Noise generated by I5 is a component of the existing conditions. However, it should be noted that the intake site is very quiet at night which is also part of the existing condition baseline. FRWA has committed to keeping operational noise levels at or below existing background levels. Design measures incorporated into the intake facility will result in minimal vibration of the levee during operation. Additionally, any vibration produced by the pumps will not reach or cause any damage to nearby residences. There are water quality differences between locations upstream and downstream of the SRCSD discharge. However, the differences vary depending on flow and discharge conditions at any given time. Conditions during a low-flow, reverse-flow event, which is the type of event that could carry waste discharges upstream are of most concern to FRWA. The FRWA member I I I I I A Hazardous Materials Management Plan will be developed before beginning construction, as required by state law. Chapter 6 of the draft EIR/EIS describes potential impacts to recreation and identifies appropriate mitigation measures as appropriate, including those associated with bicycle trails and the Sacramento River. As described in the draft EIR/EIS under Mitigation Measure 14-1 (page 14-25), noise shielding will be provided to the extent feasible and practicable to reduce construction-related noise. See the master response to Environmental Justice Issues. There are currently no plans for use of the unused capacity of the FRWP facilities other than the small quantities described in Chapter 2 of this final EIR/EIS. These facilities may provide additional regional benefits in the future by enabling regional water supply solutions. However, no such plans have been identified at this time, and any such future plan will be required to provide a new source of water (EBMUD s CVP contract does not allow for diversion of water in normal and wet years, when excess capacity would generally be available) and will undergo appropriate separate environmental review. Freeport Regional Water Project 8-88 March 2004 J&S
16
17
18 Freeport Regional Water Authority and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Chapter 8. Responses to Comments from Individuals E. Dennis and Bonnie S. Bartholomew (I30 Response to Comments of E. Dennis and Bonnie S. Bartholomew (Letter I30) I30-1. encroachment permit process to ensure compliance with their standards. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers also typically reviews and comments on the technical aspects of encroachment permit applications. I30-2. I30-6. I30-3. As described in Chapter 2 of the draft EIR/EIS under Environmental Commitments, the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (page 2-45) and Channel and Levee Restoration Plan (page 2-48) will ensure that the project design protects the levee from any project induced erosion that might otherwise occur. The draft EIR/EIS fully discloses the risk of erosion and flooding. However, more detailed information will be provided to the State Reclamation Board during the final design stage in order to obtain an encroachment permit. That is a public process and all information will be available to the public at that time. SAFCA is typically invited by the Reclamation Board to comment on encroachment permits within their jurisdiction. FRWA is responsible for the cost of implementing the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and Channel and Levee Restoration Plan features associated with the FRWP. I30-4. I30-5. The potential effects of vibration on surrounding structures is described in Chapter 14 of the draft EIR/EIS (page for example). Substantial vibration levels are very localized and are not expected to damage any structures, including the levee. In addition, the Reclamation Board will review the FRWP construction procedures, including vibratory effects, as a part of the I30-7. I30-8. I30-9. I I FRWA plans to use the existing access road to the intake site. Site access routes will be further refined during the final design stages, but additional access routes are not planned at this time. The impacts described in the draft EIR/EIS are based on use of the existing access road. Additionally, as described in Chapter 14, Noise of the draft EIR/EIS, construction noise in the vicinity of the intake facility will be substantially reduced with distance. While noise at neighboring residences will still be significant, it is not expected to cause hearing damage. As described in mitigation measure 14-1, FRWA s noise disturbance coordinator will ensure that reasonable measures are implemented to correct problems identified by residences. The draft EIR/EIS fully disclosed the impacts associated with noise, air quality, and health and safety (in Chapters 13, 14, and 15 of the draft EIR/EIS). Please also see the responses to the Intake Facility Siting major issues in Chapter 3 of this document. See response to I30-10, above. Freeport Regional Water Project 8-91 March 2004 J&S
19 Freeport Regional Water Authority and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Chapter 8. Responses to Comments from Individuals E. Dennis and Bonnie S. Bartholomew (I30 I I I I I Electric power will be provided by existing power sources in the area. The amount of power required by the intake facility, and the associated electric transformers and switches, are typical in an urban area and do not pose an increased risk to area residents. I As fully disclosed in the draft EIR/EIS (Chapters 13, 14, and 15 in particular), implementation of the FRWP is not likely to result in health-related problems for nearby residents or anyone else. Therefore, no compensation is needed. pumps will not reach or cause any damage to nearby residences. I There are water quality differences between locations upstream and downstream of the SRCSD discharge. However, the differences vary depending on flow and discharge conditions at any given time. Conditions during a low-flow, reverse-flow event, which is the type of event that could carry waste discharges upstream are of most concern to FRWA. The FRWA member agencies have a long history of securing, using, and protecting their high-quality sources of water. It is their intent to continue this practice, consistent with state and federal law and the applicable polices of their agencies (Volume 2, Appendix B, page 5-3 of the draft EIR/EIS). I A hazardous materials management plan will be developed before beginning construction, as required by state law. I I I Consistent with CEQA and NEPA, impacts of a project are measured against existing conditions. Noise generated by I-5 is a component of the existing conditions. However, it should be noted that the intake site is very quiet at night, which is also part of the existing condition baseline. FRWA has committed to keeping operational noise levels at or below existing background levels. Design measures incorporated into the intake facility will result in minimal vibration of the levee during operation. Additionally, any vibration produced by the I Chapter 6 of the draft EIR/EIS describes potential impacts to recreation and identifies appropriate mitigation measures as appropriate, including those associated with bicycle trails and the Sacramento River. I I I As described in the draft EIR/EIS under Mitigation Measure 14-1 (page 14-25), noise shielding will be provided to the extent feasible and practicable to reduce construction-related noise. See the master response to Environmental Justice Issues. There are currently no plans for use of the unused capacity of the FRWP facilities other than the small Freeport Regional Water Project 8-92 March 2004 J&S
20 Freeport Regional Water Authority and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Chapter 8. Responses to Comments from Individuals E. Dennis and Bonnie S. Bartholomew (I30 quantities described in Chapter 2 of this final EIR/EIS. These facilities may provide additional regional benefits in the future by enabling regional water supply solutions. However, no such plans have been identified at this time, and any such future plan will be required to provide a new source of water (EBMUD s CVP contract does not allow for diversion of water in normal and wet years, when excess capacity would generally be available) and will undergo appropriate separate environmental review. Freeport Regional Water Project 8-93 March 2004 J&S
21
22
23
24 Freeport Regional Water Authority and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Chapter 8. Responses to Comments from Individuals Stephen and Shari Kawelo (I31 Response to Comments of Stephen and Shari Kawelo (Letter I31) I I31-1. I31-2. I31-3. I31-4. I31-5. I31-6. I31-7. I31-8. I31-9. I I See the master response to the Public Outreach Process. FRWA identified the Carmichael Water District pump and water treatment plant facility as a local, reasonably similar facility within a residential neighborhood and immediately adjacent to single-family houses. This facility includes water pumps, compressors, air surge tanks, electrical transformer, and chemical storage facilities. The mitigation identified in the draft EIR/EIS is adequate. See the master response to Environmental Justice Issues. I I A complete list of mitigation measures will be included in the CEQA Findings and adopted in the mitigation monitoring and reporting plan. This list should be consistent with those described in the final EIR/EIS. FRWA is the lead CEQA agency and is the agency with the legal responsibility to ensure that mitigation measures are implemented. The mitigation monitoring and reporting plan will set forth the timing of mitigation measure implementation and identify the responsible party. As described in Chapter 2 of the draft EIR/EIS under Environmental Commitments, the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (page 2-45) and Channel and Levee Restoration Plan (page 2-48) will ensure that the project design protects the levee from any project induced erosion that might otherwise occur. The draft EIR/EIS fully discloses the risk of erosion and flooding. However, more detailed information will be provided to the State Reclamation Board during the final design stage in order to obtain an encroachment permit. That is a public process and all information will be available to the public at that time. SAFCA is typically invited by the Reclamation Board to comment on encroachment permits within their jurisdiction. FRWA is responsible for the cost of implementing the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and Channel and Levee Restoration Plan features associated with the FRWP. I A Hazardous Materials Management Plan will be developed before beginning construction, as required by state law. I Given the geographic location of the proposed intake site and its distance from known geologic faults, substantial seismic activity is unlikely. The potential for Freeport Regional Water Project 8-97 March 2004 J&S
25 Freeport Regional Water Authority and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Chapter 8. Responses to Comments from Individuals Stephen and Shari Kawelo (I31 liquefaction, which is the result of saturated soil and simultaneous seismic activity, is even less likely. However, the intake facility and all related components will be designed to meet relevant geotechnical and seismic safety standards. The intake structure itself will be constructed on a series of deeply driven piles capable of withstanding potential seismic activity. The other related facilities, including the surge tanks, air compressors, and chemical storage facility, are not substantial in size or weight and will be constructed to meet seismic safety standards. While variations in soil type and quality have been identified at the site in previous studies, these soil types are common throughout the Central Valley and can adequately support the proposed project, assuming standard engineering practices are employed. I I I As fully disclosed in the draft EIR/EIS (Chapters 13, 14, and 15 in particular), implementation of the FRWP is not likely to result in health-related problems for nearby residents or anyone else. Therefore, no compensation is needed. I All relevant aspects of the Principles of Agreement are included in the draft EIR/EIS. I I I The draft EIR/EIS evaluated all environmental resources required under CEQA and NEPA. The facility locations in the draft EIR/EIS were based on site constraints. Modifications have been made to those locations based on discussions with the City of Sacramento and the community and the new site layout is shown in Figure 2-1 of the final EIR/EIS. Furthermore, additional detail about the associated facilities at the intake site are described in the updated project description in Chapter 2 of the final EIR/EIS. Figure 2-1 provides a layout of the relative positions and sizes of the different components of the project that are related to the intake facility. A more detailed description of these components has been added to the revised project description in Chapter 2 of the final EIR/EIS. Freeport Regional Water Project 8-98 March 2004 J&S
26
27 Freeport Regional Water Authority and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Chapter 8. Responses to Comments from Individuals James Morgan (I32 Response to Comments of James Morgan (Letter I32) I32-1. Implementation of the preferred alternative would exercise EBMUD s amendatory contract, which only allows one diversion point. The only circumstances that would allow for an EBMUD diversion from the American River would require that a Sacramento River diversion near Freeport could not be reasonably implemented. While the FRWP provides the physical means necessary to divert water from the American River, implementation of the FRWP, and the preferred alternative in particular, would eliminate EBMUD s current option of diverting water at the Folsom South Canal. Project Update, of this final EIR/EIS are purely speculative. There are currently no plans for use of the unused capacity of the FRWP facilities. These facilities may provide additional regional benefits in the future by enabling regional water supply solutions. However, no such plans have been identified at this time, and any such future plan will be required to provide a new source of water and will undergo appropriate separate environmental review. I32-2. I32-3. A primary rationale for eliminating the Freeport diversion alternative with a pipeline proceeding south directly to the Mokelumne Aqueducts is based on the need for the FRWP to ultimately meet the purpose and need of both EBMUD and SCWA. The intake structure is the only element of a project at Freeport with a pipeline proceeding south that would assist SCWA in meeting its project purpose and need. SCWA would need to construct a separate pipeline to deliver water to its proposed Zone 40 Water Treatment Plant. As a result, there would be minimal cost-sharing opportunities for the FRWA member agencies and overall costs would be prohibitive. In addition, environmental impacts would be greater under this alternative than for the alternatives described in the draft EIR/EIS. See response I32-1, above. Additionally, diversions to agencies other than those described in Chapter 2, Freeport Regional Water Project March 2004 J&S
28
29 Freeport Regional Water Authority and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Chapter 8. Responses to Comments from Individuals Willie J. Russell II (I33 Response to Comments of Willie J. Russell II (Letter I33) I33-1. See the master response to the Intake Facility Issues. transformers and switches, are typical in an urban area and do not pose an increased risk to area residents. I33-2. I33-3. I33-4. I33-5. I33-6. As described in Chapter 2 of the draft EIR/EIS under Environmental Commitments, the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (page 2-45) and Channel and Levee Restoration Plan (page 2-48) will ensure that the project design protects the levee from any project induced erosion that might otherwise occur. The draft EIR/EIS fully discloses the risk of erosion and flooding. However, more detailed information will be provided to the State Reclamation Board during the final design stage in order to obtain an encroachment permit. That is a public process and all information will be available to the public at that time. SAFCA is typically invited by the Reclamation Board to comment on encroachment permits within their jurisdiction. FRWA is responsible for the cost of implementing the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and Channel and Levee Restoration Plan features associated with the FRWP. See the master response to the Intake Facility Issues. See the master response to the Intake Facility Issues. Design measures incorporated into the intake facility will result in minimal vibration of the levee during operation. Additionally, any vibration produced by the pumps will not reach or cause any damage to nearby residences. Electric power will be provided by existing power sources in the area. The amount of power required by the intake facility, and the associated electric Freeport Regional Water Project March 2004 J&S
30
31 Freeport Regional Water Authority and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Chapter 8. Responses to Comments from Individuals Florence Arnoldy (I34 Response to Comments of Florence Arnoldy (Letter I34) I34-1. I34-2. I34-3. I34-4. I34-5. I34-6. I34-7. I34-8. See the master response to the Intake Facility Issues. The potential impacts to the adjacent residences are fully addressed in the draft and final EIR/EIS. The use is consistent with relevant land use plans. Also, see the master response to the Intake Facility Issues. See the master response to the Intake Facility Issues. See the master response to the Intake Facility Issues. See the master response to the Intake Facility Issues. See the master response to the Intake Facility Issues. See the master response to the Intake Facility Issues. Potential impacts on species of special concern are fully addressed in Chapter 8, Wildlife, of the draft EIR/EIS. Appropriate mitigation measures are identified where needed. As described in Chapter 8, reconnaissance-level surveys were conducted for purposes of preparing the draft EIR/EIS. Additional surveys, as required by state and federal resource agencies, will be conducted prior to construction. This applies to all project components, including the intake facility. Freeport Regional Water Project March 2004 J&S
32
33
34
35
36
37 Freeport Regional Water Authority and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Chapter 8. Responses to Comments from Individuals William and Yvette Jones (I35 Response to Comments of William and Yvette Jones (Letter I35) I35-1. I35-2. I35-3. I35-4. I35-5. I35-6. I35-7. I35-8. See the master response to Environmental Justice Issues. As described in the Alternatives Screening Report (Volume 2, Appendix B, of the draft EIR/EIS) there are mutual benefits to the region in partnering on a project such as the FRWP, including a reduction in environmental impacts. See the master response to Public Outreach Process. The layout of project elements at the intake site has been modified based on input provided by the City of Sacramento and members of the community. A revised layout is shown in Figure 2-1 in the final EIR/EIS. I I I I I I I I I The draft EIR/EIS fully discloses the impacts within the City of Sacramento and proposes mitigation to reduce these impacts to the extent feasible. The draft EIR/EIS fully discloses the impacts associated with the intake site. Furthermore, FRWA has coordinated closely with the City of Sacramento and the County of Sacramento and provided copies of the draft EIR/EIS for their review. See the master response to Environmental Justice Issues. I35-9. See the master response to Public Outreach Process. I I See the master response to Environmental Justice Issues. I I FRWA identified the Carmichael Water District pump and water treatment plant facility as a local, reasonably similar facility close to a residential neighborhood and immediately adjacent to single-family houses. This facility includes water pumps, compressors, air surge tanks, electrical transformer, and chemical storage facilities. I I See the master response to Environmental Justice Issues. The commentor s objection to the project is noted. Freeport Regional Water Project March 2004 J&S
In the final EIR/EIS, FRWA commits to maintaining operational noise levels at or below existing background noise levels.
Freeport Regional Water Authority and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Chapter 8. Responses to Comments from Individuals Mary McDonald (I40) Response to Comments of Mary McDonald
More informationResponse to Comments of Rudy Swiridoff (Letter I14) The commentor s objection to the project is noted.
Freeport Regional Water Authority and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Chapter 8. Responses to Comments from Individuals Rudy Swiridoff (I14) Response to Comments of Rudy Swiridoff
More informationFreeport Regional Water Authority. c/o Gregg Ellis 2600 V Street Sacramento, CA 95818
Notice of Preparation and Notice of Intent for the Freeport Regional Water Project, Sacramento, Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement Freeport Regional Water Authority U.S. Bureau
More informationChapter 3 Responses to Major Issues Regarding the EIR/EIS
Chapter 3 Responses to Major Issues Regarding the EIR/EIS Chapter 3 Master Responses Introduction This chapter contains responses to similar comments that were received from several commenting parties.
More informationAppendix A Structure Siting Summary
Appendix A Structure Siting Summary INTAKE STRUCTURE SITING SUMMARY NOVEMBER 2003 Sacramento County Water Agency East Bay Municipal Utility District The (FRWA) is proposing the Freeport Regional Water
More informationSECTION 9.0 Effects Found Not To Be Significant
SECTION 9.0 Effects Found Not To Be Significant 9.0 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT The City of Santa Clarita conducted an Initial Study in April 2006 to determine significant effects of the proposed
More informationWater for Southern California: How Bay-Delta is Key to All of the Above Strategy
Water for Southern California: How Bay-Delta is Key to All of the Above Strategy Stephen N. Arakawa Manager, Bay-Delta Initiatives The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California October 15, 2016
More informationAdministrative Final 1
1 For the (ARWA), we appreciate the opportunity to comment on the final environmental impact report/environmental impact statement (FEIR/EIS) for the California WaterFix project. These agencies rely, in
More informationCalifornia League of Cities Briefing on Water Supply Issues
California League of Cities Briefing on Water Supply Issues Stephen N. Arakawa Manager, Bay-Delta Initiatives The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California May 5, 2016 California WaterFix: Securing
More informationCalifornia WaterFix (Alternative 4A)/Recirculated Environmental Analysis Frequently Asked Questions
Updated August 2015 California WaterFix (Alternative 4A)/Recirculated Environmental Analysis Frequently Asked Questions 1. What is the purpose and need for California WaterFix (Alternative 4A)? The California
More informationSAFETY AND NOISE 9. Safety and Noise
SAFETY AND NOISE 9 9 Safety and Noise Safety is a basic human need and is required for a community to thrive. The goals and policies in this element are designed to protect and enhance public health and
More informationIncremental Recycled Water Program 2007 ADDENDUM TO PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
SANTA ROSA SUBREGIONAL WATER REUSE SYSTEM Incremental Recycled Water Program 2007 ADDENDUM TO PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SCH #2002072046 March 2007 SANTA ROSA SUBREGIONAL WATER REUSE SYSTEM 2007
More informationRESOLUTION NO:
RESOLUTION NO: 11-031 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASO ROBLES CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE 2011 CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN AND ADOPTING FINDINGS,
More informationSacramento Area Flood Control Agency. May State Clearinghouse No Prepared for: Prepared by: Consulting Engineers and Scientists
Addendum No. 3 (North Sacramento Streams) to the Environmental Impact Report on the North Sacramento Streams, Sacramento River East Levee, Lower American River, and Related Flood Improvements Project Prepared
More information10.1 Summary Comparison of Proposed Project
Chapter Soils. Summary Comparison of Proposed Project A summary comparison of quantifiable impacts on soils is provided in Figure -0. This figure provides information on the impact of loss of topsoil (expressed
More informationThe Nature Conservancy Cosumnes River Preserve Franklin Boulevard Galt CA 95632
Study Partners The Nature Conservancy Cosumnes River Preserve 13501 Franklin Boulevard Galt CA 95632 East Bay Municipal Utility District 1 Winemaker Way, Unit K Lodi CA 95240 Sacramento County Water Agency
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO DISTRICT 1325 J STREET SACRAMENTO CA PUBLIC NOTICE
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO DISTRICT 1325 J STREET SACRAMENTO CA 95814-2922 Operations and Readiness Branch PUBLIC NOTICE REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO MODIFY A U.S. ARMY
More informationRevised 8-4. Board of Directors Water Planning and Stewardship Committee. September 11, 2007 Board Meeting. Subject. Description
Board of Directors Water Planning and Stewardship Committee September 11, 2007 Board Meeting Subject Adopt criteria for conveyance options in implementation of Long Term Delta Plan Description Revised
More informationNOTICE OF PREPARATION
NOTICE OF PREPARATION Date: June 12, 2014 To: From: Subject: Governor s Office of Planning and Research/State Clearinghouse Unit, Responsible Agencies, Trustee Agencies, and Interested Parties Announcement
More informationBAY DELTA CONSERVATION PLAN/ CALIFORNIA WATERFIX
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE BAY DELTA CONSERVATION PLAN/ CALIFORNIA WATERFIX VOLUME I. FINAL EIR/EIS FOR THE BDCP/CALIFORNIA WATERFIX P REPARED FOR: California
More informationFINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
WEST SACRAMENTO AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY SOUTHPORT SACRAMENTO RIVER EARLY IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT (BORROW ONE PROJECT) FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS P R E P A R E D F O R
More informationSacramento County Board of Supervisors Sacramento County Water Agency. October 21, 2008
Sacramento County Board of Supervisors Sacramento County Water Agency October 21, 2008 Adopt Resolutions Approving the Sacramento County and the Sacramento County Water Agency Policies With Respect to
More informationFolsom Dam Water Control Manual Update
Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update Stakeholder Discussion October 31, 2013 Location: Tsakopoulos Library Galleria, East Room, 828 I Street, Sacramento US Army Corps of Engineers WELCOME & INTRODUCTIONS
More informationAgricultural Resources
0 0 0 0..0 Agricultural Resources Impact AG-: Temporary Conversion, Short-Term Conversion, and Permanent Conversion of Important Farmland or of Land Subject to Williamson Act Contracts or in Farmland Security
More informationEnvironmental Impact Statement for the Green Line to the Airport Project. ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/18/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-29418, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Transit
More informationAppendix B Draft Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report
Appendix B Draft Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report Appendix B Contents Draft Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report Freeport Regional Water Authority Comments on the Draft Fish and Wildlife
More informationCEQA Categorical Exemption Determination
CEQA Categorical Exemption Determination PROPERTY INFORMATION/PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Address Block/Lot(s) Case No. Permit No. Addition/ Alteration Demolition (requires HRE for Category B Building)
More informationNotice of Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the
BILLING CODE: 3720-58 This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/10/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-02779, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
More informationNOTICE OF PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR WOODLAND RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY PARK SPECIFIC PLAN FOCUS OF INPUT NOP RESPONSES
NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR WOODLAND RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY PARK SPECIFIC PLAN To: Responsible Agencies, Trustee Agencies, Organizations, and Interested Parties From: Erika
More informationPUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT
CHAPTER 5 PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT Since late 2010, several types of public and agency participation have occurred as a part of the project design and the environmental review process, pursuant to
More informationChapter 6 Erosion & Stormwater Study Team
Chapter 6 Erosion & Stormwater Study Team Objective How do we stabilize the Las Vegas Wash environment to most effectively reduce erosion and enhance wetlands? Introduction The Las Vegas Wash (Wash) has
More informationAPPENDIX M CEQA Initial Study Checklist
APPENDIX M CEQA Initial Study Checklist Appendix G ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To be Completed by Applicant) 1. Project title: 2. Lead agency name and address: 3. Contact person and phone number: 4.
More informationPublic Notice. Applicant: City of Dallas Project No.: SWF Date: April 18, Name: Chandler Peter Phone Number:
Public Notice Applicant: City of Dallas Project No.: SWF- 2014-00151 Date: April 18, 2014 The purpose of this public notice is to inform you of a proposal for work in which you might be interested. It
More informationCarpinteria Valley Water District Carpinteria Advanced Purification Project
NOTICE OF PREPARATION AND SCOPING MEETING Carpinteria Valley Water District Carpinteria Advanced Purification Project TO: Agencies, Organizations, and Interested Parties DATE: January 7, 2019 SUBJECT:
More informationChapter 9 Wetlands Park Study Team
Chapter 9 Wetlands Park Study Team Objective How can we help Clark County facilitate implementation of the Clark County Wetlands Park Master Plan, and provide for the management of various ecosystems within
More information31.1 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources/Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes
Chapter This chapter provides an overview of other CEQA and NEPA considerations based on the technical analyses presented in Chapters. This chapter addresses significant irreversible and irretrievable
More information5. OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
5. OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS Cumulative Impacts CEQA requires the analysis of impacts due to cumulative development that would occur independent of, but during the same timeframe as, the project under
More informationBDCP Public Meeting. November 29, 2012
BDCP Public Meeting November 29, 2012 BDCP Proposed Project Update and Response to Agency Comments ICF International California Department of Water Resources California Department of Fish and Game U.S.
More informationAPPENDIX A. Project Scoping
APPENDIX A Project Scoping Notice of Preparation To: From: Agencies and Interested Parties Paul Brunner, Executive Director, Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority Date: June 13, 2006 Subject: Notice
More informationChapter 2 Project Objectives and Purpose and Need
Chapter Project Objectives and Purpose and Need The BDCP sets out a comprehensive conservation strategy for the Delta designed to restore and protect ecosystem health, water supply reliability, and water
More informationADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL IN SUPPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA WATERFIX AND CALIFORNIA ECO RESTORE
ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL IN SUPPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA WATERFIX AND CALIFORNIA ECO RESTORE Presented by Gary Takara City Council September 18, 2017 Agenda Item 12 Recommendations Find that
More informationFriant Dam and Millerton Reservoir
San Joaquin River Restoration Program Floodplain Management Association Presentation SJRRP Update Continued: Impacts from Subsidence April 18, 2013 1 Friant Dam and Millerton Reservoir Completed in 1942
More informationAppendix M. Criteria, Measures and Indicators for Effects Assessment
Appendix M Criteria, Measures and Indicators for Effects Assessment Appendix M. Criteria, Measures and Indicators for Effects Assessment Objective 1: Naturalization Changes to Aquatic Habitat Disruption,
More informationMitigation Monitoring Program Campus Master Plan 2015
Mitigation Program Campus Master Plan 2015 California State University, Sacramento May 2015 Environmental Mitigation Program Sacramento Campus Master Plan 2015 Project Section 1: Authority This Environmental
More informationChapter 1 Introduction
Chapter Introduction Note to Readers: Due to timing constraints, publication and release for public review of this Draft Supplemental EIR/EIS is being done by DWR as lead agency in compliance with the
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF MINING AND RECLAMATION. Coal Refuse Disposal - Site Selection
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF MINING AND RECLAMATION DOCUMENT NUMBER: 563-2113-660 TITLE: Coal Refuse Disposal - Site Selection EFFECTIVE DATE: February 8, 1999 AUTHORITY: The Coal Refuse
More informationFolsom Dam Water Control Manual Update
Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update Stakeholder Discussion February 28 & March 28, 2013 Location: Tsakopoulos Library Galleria, 828 I Street, Sacramento US Army Corps of Engineers WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS
More informationAn Overview and Comparison of the Tennessee Department of Transportation s Environmental Evaluation Process
Introduction This document provides a brief overview of the policy and procedures that govern the environmental evaluation process that the Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) must follow for
More informationCapital Facilities Element
Capital Facilities Element Purpose The Growth Management Act requires cities to prepare a capital facilities element consisting of: 1. An inventory of current capital facilities owned by public entities,
More informationGood morning, Chairman Yaw, Chairman Yudichak, Chairman Vulakovich, Chairman Costa,
Testimony of Patrick McDonnell, Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Joint Hearing on Flooding and Emergency Response Senate Environmental Resources & Energy and Veterans Affairs
More informationChapter 3 Planning Objectives and Constraints and the Alternative Development Process
Chapter 3 Planning Objectives and Constraints and the Alternative Development Process Planning Objectives and Constraints The planning objectives for the NODOS Investigation are consistent with the Federal
More informationNotice of Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Intake. Diversion Dam Fish Passage Project, Dawson County, Montana
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/04/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-33066, and on FDsys.gov BILLING CODE: 3720-58 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
More informationE. Other Federal Requirements and CEQA Considerations
E. Other Federal Requirements and CEQA Considerations Section E.1 includes discussions of various topics required by NEPA and/or CEQA, including a description of the long-term implications of the Project,
More information(1) The proposed commercial solar energy generation facility is either
(2) The design and siting of these facilities shall avoid the placement of turbines on or immediately adjacent to the upwind side of ridge crests; (3) The design may include other design features to minimize
More informationEROSION, SEDIMENTATION, ETC
EROSION, SEDIMENTATION, ETC. 19-61 ARTICLE V. WATER QUALITY REVIEW IN SPECIAL PROTECTION AREAS. Sec. 19-60. Findings and purpose. (a) The County Council finds that streams, rivers, wetlands, and other
More information2017 Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Transportation Plan. Draft Environmental Impact Report. Volume
2017 Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report 2017 Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Plan State Clearinghouse #2017022054 ic l b ew u P vi t Rer a f D Volume
More informationDRAFT ANNOTATED OUTLINE 12/4/2006
DRAFT ANNOTATED OUTLINE 12/4/2006 INTEGRATED WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN SAN DIEGO REGION A. INTRODUCTION AND REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT GROUP Summary This Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (IRWM Plan)
More informationFrequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions Chelan County Shoreline Master Program Update July 2009 What is an SMP? Shoreline Master Programs (SMP) are a combination of rules and comprehensive planning that are prepared
More informationProject Scoping Meeting Thousand Palms Flood Control Project EIR/EIS
Project Scoping Meeting Thousand Palms Flood Control Project EIR/EIS Thousand Palms Community Center December 6, 2016 6:00 p.m. Coachella Valley Water District Meeting Agenda Introductions CEQA Lead Agency:
More informationRegional Feather River Diversion Feasibility Study
Regional Feather River Diversion Feasibility Study I. Project Sponsor Contact Information YCWA-13 Lead Agency/Organization Yuba County Water Agency Name of Primary Contact(s) Curt Aikens Mailing Address
More informationCHAPTER 16 LAND USE 16.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING/AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT YUBA REGION
CHAPTER 16 LAND USE Counties and incorporated cities regulate land use within the Sacramento Valley. This section presents an overview of land use conditions in the Sacramento Valley, with specific attention
More information1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW The proposed ERG Foxen Petroleum Pipeline (Project) would be located in northern Santa Barbara County, six miles east of the City of Santa Maria, and between the towns
More informationLevee Cutoff Wall Construction Considerations Natomas Levee Improvement Program July 28, 2009
Levee Cutoff Wall Construction Considerations Natomas Levee Improvement Program Background The Natomas Levee Improvement Program (NLIP), sponsored by the Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (SAFCA) with
More informationNOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Date: September 18, 2017 NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT To: Agencies and Interested Parties Lead Agency: Sacramento Municipal Utility District 6201 S Street, MS H201 Sacramento,
More informationCEQA Categorical Exemption Determination
CEQA Categorical Exemption Determination PROPERTY INFORMATION/PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Address REC & PARK: Rose de Vents - 100 John F. Kennedy Drive Case No. 2018-014948ENV Block/Lot(s) Permit No. Addition/
More informationModel Riparian Buffer Ordinance.
Model Riparian Buffer Ordinance. This is a sample riparian buffer ordinance written as an amendment to an existing zoning ordinance. This ordinance complies with the state minimum standards for river corridor
More informationNorthwest State Route 138 Corridor Improvement Project
Northwest State Route 138 Corridor Improvement Project Los Angeles County, CA DISTRICT 7- LA- 138 (PM 0.0/36.8); DISTRICT 7- LA- 05 (PM 79.5/83.1); DISTRICT 7- LA- 14 (PM 73.4/74.4) 265100/ 0700001816
More informationCEQA Categorical Exemption Determination
CEQA Categorical Exemption Determination PROPERTY INFORMATION/PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Address Block/Lot(s) REC & PARK: 210V HYDE STREET 0336/003 Case No. 2017-016267ENV Permit No. Addition/ Alteration
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED FLINT HILLS RESOURCES, LP - ULTRA LOW SULFUR DIESEL
More informationVenice Pumping Plant Dual Force Main Project Draft EIR 1.0 I NTRODUCTION
1.0 I NTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE EIR The purpose of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), as defined in Section 15121(a) of the State Guidelines for the implementation of the California Environmental
More informationOTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS
Chapter 5 OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS CEQA Guidelines Section 15128 requires that an EIR disclose the reasons why various possible environmental effects of a proposed project are found not to be significant
More information2.1 Overview. Chapter 2 Project Objectives and Purpose and Need
1 Chapter The BDCP sets out a comprehensive conservation strategy for the Delta designed to restore and protect ecosystem health, water supply, and water quality within a stable regulatory framework. The
More informationInglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project Draft Environmental Impact Report
Draft Environmental Impact Report SCH No. 2015101030 Prepared for: City of Culver City Planning Division 9770 Culver Boulevard Culver City, California 90232 Prepared by: Psomas 225 South Lake Avenue Suite
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO DISTRICT 1325 J STREET SACRAMENTO CA PUBLIC NOTICE
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO DISTRICT 1325 J STREET SACRAMENTO CA 95814-2922 408 Permission Section PUBLIC NOTICE REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO ALTER A U.S. ARMY CORPS OF
More informationCHAPTER 7. San Dieguito River Flooding Adaptation
CHAPTER 7 San Dieguito River Flooding Adaptation This chapter includes a range of adaptation measures to address vulnerabilities from flooding along the San Dieguito River, including the river valley,
More informationCity of Bishop. Environmental Checklist Form
City of Bishop Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project title: Environmental Review / 2007 California Building Codes 2. Lead agency name and address: City of Bishop 377 W. Line Street Bishop, Ca 93514 3.
More informationAlternatives Analysis
CHAPTER 6 Alternatives Analysis 6.1 Introduction The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) require that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and
More information2 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
2 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE 2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that public agencies (e.g., local, county, regional, and
More informationAppendix A East Bay Municipal Utility District Water Supply Reliability
Appendix A Water Supply Reliability Water Supply Reliability Freeport Regional Water Authority Sacramento County Water Agency U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Contents Page Assessing
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED WAHKON WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY EXPANSION MILLE
More informationCalifornia High-Speed Train Program FEIR/EIS
Page 2-30 Page 2-31 Page 2-32 Page 2-33 Page 2-34 Page 2-35 Page 2-36 of Enrique Manzanilla, Director U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, August 31, 2004 (Letter AF008) AF008-1 Acknowledged. AF008-2
More informationEngineer s Report. Santa Clara Valley Water District California Aqueduct Reverse Flow Project Project No
17 Santa Clara Valley Water District California Aqueduct Reverse Flow Project Project No. 60061007-6810 Engineer s Report February 2015 Water Utility Capital Division This page intentionally left blank.
More informationAPPENDIX A: NOTICE OF PREPARATION AND COMMENTS RECEIVED
APPENDIX A: NOTICE OF PREPARATION AND COMMENTS RECEIVED Date: September 19, 2017 NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT To: Agencies and Interested Parties Lead Agency: Sacramento Municipal
More informationZone 40 Water System Infrastructure Plan
SACRAMENTO COUNTY WATER AGENCY Sacramento County Water Agency April 2006 Sacramento County Water Agency Staff: Darrell Eck, Senior Civil Engineer Dan Barry, Senior Civil Engineer Mike Crooks, Senior Civil
More informationNOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Date: September 19, 2017 NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT To: Agencies and Interested Parties Lead Agency: Sacramento Municipal Utility District 6201 S Street, MS B203 Sacramento,
More information32. Relationship Between Short-term Uses and Long-term Productivity
32. Relationship Between Short-term Uses and Long-term Productivity 32.1 Introduction The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1502.16) require consideration of the relationship
More informationCHAPTER 8 FLOOD CONTROL 8.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING/AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT YUBA REGION
CHAPTER 8 FLOOD CONTROL Floods can be damaging and costly, often resulting in loss of life or substantial property damage. Levees, dams, and reservoirs provide flood control throughout most of California.
More informationTechnical Memorandum Channel Capacity Report 2018 Restoration Year
Technical Memorandum Channel Capacity Report 2018 Restoration Year 1 Table of Contents 2 1.0 Executive Summary... ES-1 3 4 2.0 Introduction... 1 5 2.1 Objective... 2 6 2.2 CCAG Roles and Responsibilities...
More informationPROJECT INFORMATION FORM Project Review Process is described by Chapter 7 of the IRWMP Form Revised
Name Proponent(s) Location Description Status Background (75) Tertiary Treatment at Fresno/Clovis Regional Reclamation Facility City of Fresno 36.70201, -119.89517 This project is for the construction
More informationPreliminary Feasibility Study for South San Francisco Bay Shoreline Economic Impact Areas 1-10 Executive Summary
Economic Impact Areas 1-10 Executive Summary Prepared For: Department of Water Resource Division of Flood Management State Of California Prepared By: Santa Clara Valley Water District February 2017 A preliminary
More informationSACRAMENTO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 1112 I Street, Suite #100 Sacramento, California (916) August 3, 2005
SACRAMENTO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 1112 I Street, Suite #100 Sacramento, California 95814 (916) 874-6458 August 3, 2005 TO: FROM: RE: Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission Peter Brundage,
More informationIntegrating Sea Level Rise Considerations in the South Bay Salt Ponds Restoration Project. Norma J. Camacho Chief Operating Officer, Watersheds
Integrating Sea Level Rise Considerations in the South Bay Salt Ponds Restoration Project Norma J. Camacho Chief Operating Officer, Watersheds Presentation Overview Mission of the District Santa Clara
More informationPROJECT OVERVIEW. B.G. Heiland, P.E. June 15, 2016
PROJECT OVERVIEW B.G. Heiland, P.E. June 15, 2016 WATER DELIVERY UPGRADE PERMITTING APPROACH BDCP Habitat Conservation Plan under Section 10 of the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Natural Community Conservation
More informationSUBJECT: LE SKY RANCH WASTEWATER RECLAMATION FACILITY LOCATION AND EXTENT MOLLY ORKILD-LARSON, SENIOR PLANNER JUNE 11, 2018
ARAPAHOE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING June 19, 2018 6:30 P.M. SUBJECT: LE18-002 SKY RANCH WASTEWATER RECLAMATION FACILITY LOCATION AND EXTENT MOLLY ORKILD-LARSON, SENIOR PLANNER JUNE 11, 2018
More informationCarmel River Reroute & San Clemente Dam Removal Project (PLN110373) Monterey County Planning Commission Workshop July 25, 2012
Carmel River Reroute & San Clemente Dam Removal Project (PLN110373) Monterey County Planning Commission Workshop July 25, 2012 URS1 Workshop Agenda 1. Background 2. Project Overview 3. Tree Removals/Mitigation
More informationThe Caltrans Contract Manager will assign specific projects to the Consultant through the issuance of Task Orders.
Scope of Work/Deliverables Environmental Services for Project Specific High Desert Corridor Area of Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties (District 7 & 8) Attachment 1 Page 1 of 11 A. Project Description
More informationSECTION 6.0 Alternatives to the Proposed Project
SECTION 6.0 Alternatives to the Proposed Project 6.0 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT CEQA requires that an EIR include an analysis of a range of project alternatives that could feasibly attain most
More informationFrequently Asked Questions*
Pacheco Reservoir Expansion Project Frequently Asked Questions* The Santa Clara Valley Water District, the Pacheco Pass Water District, and the San Benito County Water District are working together to
More informationWastewater System Upgrades Project
Wastewater System Upgrades Project Final Master Environmental Impact Report State Clearinghouse # 2013082006 Lead Agency: City of Modesto Utilities Department Prepared By: Jerry Haag, Urban Planner November
More informationCEQA Categorical Exemption Determination
CEQA Categorical Exemption Determination PROPERTY INFORMATION/PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Address REC & PARK: JURI COMMONS PARK RENOVATION Case No. 2018-009517ENV Block/Lot(s) 6532008 Permit No. Addition/
More information