EUROPEAN CO2 TEST CENTRE MONGSTAD NORWAY Bjørn-Erik Haugan Gassnova Director

Transcription

1 EUROPEAN CO2 TEST CENTRE MONGSTAD NORWAY Bjørn-Erik Haugan Gassnova Director

2 Norway: CCS technology development NOK Counselling Studies Gas Tech. fund 250 mill Gas technology program, CLIMIT Industry Project funding Research Develop Demo Commercial.

3 Carbon cycle CCGT kwh Petro chemistry Industry CO 2 H 2 Technology Capture Gas process Oil Oil- and gas production EOR CO 2 -Transport Storage Climate

4 Vision: CCGT Profitable gas power with carbon kwhcapture and Petro Industry chemistry storage CO 2 H 2 Gas process Oil Technology development Technology Oil- and gas production Commercial basis EOR CO 2 -Transport Storage Capture Climate

5 Costs and potential 30 CCS incremental cost per kwh Post Combustion 25 Disposal øre per kwh Energy Other operating Disposal Energy R&D improvement Other operating 5 CAPEX capex - NVE basis Future

6 The Norwegian setting Government declaration: CCS at new CCGT Climate issues and CCS broad acceptance 10 year large scale CO 2 storage experience at Sleipner Pioneering environment: Oil industry largely built on R&D and new Offshore technology Strong research community

7 Mongstad Refinery, Norway -site of Combined Heat and Power Plant (CHP) 7

8 8 Mongstad CHP Project description Troll A Kollsnes EL grid Mongstad EL 180 MW EL 60 MW Refinery Gjøa EL 40 MW 280 MW CHP EL Gas Gas terminal Gas pipeline GTs Heat 350 MW Gas to Europe Refinery surplus fuel gas CHP efficiency 70% - 80%

9 The CO 2 sources at the Mongstad refinery: A few major and a number of smaller sources 9 Emission outlet konsesjonspunkt Water treatment plant konsesjonspunkt Kokslastinloading Coke- H-1901 H-5001 Fakkel Flare H-5201 SK-702 Coke storage H-5101 SK-101 H-102 H-1201/2 SG-2504/05 SK-4802 SK-1401 SK-4801 SK-1531 A significant number of CO 2 - source today. Some will disappear and some will merge with EVM. Most relevant for future CO 2 capture: EVM (CHP plant) Cracker Reformer Future CHP plant location

10 Full scale CO 2 management in two stages Capture CHP and Test center startup Fullscale CO 2 - capture 2014 Test center tonnes/year Identify, test and qualify technology Reduce cost and risk Test center developm ent CO 2 capture Pilot scale R&D&D Company Full scale Agree & prepare Design Development Full-scale CO 2 capture

11 Mongstad CHP CO 2 emissions from Mongstad Test Center 3 Sources to Be decided 2,5 Energy supply CO 2 capture Stage 2 11 CO2 emissions (MT/year) 2 1,5 1 Cracker Cracker CHP Cracker CHP Today s emissions 0,5 0 Other sources STAGE 1: - EVM / EEI - Small CO 2 capture Full scale CO 2 capture New EEI Possible future emissions

12 Towards full scale CO 2 capture Full scale Pilot scale Lab scale Kårstø Mongstad Test Centre OxyFuel Germany Halten Mongstad Hypogen EU, US EU: plants K-lab

13 Technology Company Main objective Testing, verification and demonstration of CO 2 -capture technology with reduced costs and risks Capable of wide national and international deployment Specific objective technology capable of reducing cost and risk related to full scale CO 2 capture, including full scale CO 2 -capture at Mongstad Refinery to be decided upon in 2012

14 Organisation..as of January 2007 Govt. Statoil Steering committee ü Norwegian Government ü Statoil Technology group ü Norwegian Government ü Statoil ü Other CCGT projects

15 Activities 2007 Technology screening Up to March Pre Engineering April to December Engineering End/07 and onwards Framework of cooperation Bilateral Agreement of Implementation (Govt. Statoil) Co-operation Agreement, (multilateral) Company Participants agreement

16 Organisation SC TG Co-operation Steering committee Technical Board Company Task Force Project preparation Concept and pre-engineering phase Project Q1-07 Q2-07 Q1-08

17 Technical objectives, initial phase Investigate technical conditions e.g. tie-in, utilities, fluegas sources and location at Mongstad site Identify necessary project timeframe and results for Mongstad and for other planned full scale CO 2 projects Propose project intentions and ambitions Propose project execution strategy Perform technology screening Cost estimation and choice of concept is NOT part of this project phase

18 Ownership and framework 80% 20% Govt. Owner X Owner Y Owner Z Statoil Statoil 20% Govt. 80% will invite others and dilute Duration: years Technology Co Government responsible for CO 2

19 Participants, Criteria Technology users: Energy-Co, Oil-Co Corresponding interest CO 2 technology and CO 2 management a strategic priority Technology Co important for the participants No conflicting interests Not competitors within this area of technology Contribution Capital, Competence, know-how and/or IPR Significant holding Complementarity Government discretion to select invitees

20 IPR and know-how Fundamental principle Add value to the owners: primarily through their core business IP origin Made available to Technology Co from owners and/or vendors Generated in Technology Co / projects Regulated through: Technical Co Partnership agreement Project agreements with vendors and participating partners Regulates IPR gained in individual projects

21 Business model Owner Owners IPR and know-how Technology Co Project Owner Project Project Owner Know-how obtained Development projects (to be defined) Owners participate with competence, IPR and capital Vendors participation based on competition Vend. IPR formed Vend. Vend. IPR and know-how agreed in development contracts between Technical Co and vendors Vendor patents