APPENDIX F. Receiving Water Conditions, Potential Impacts of MS4 Discharges, and Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA
|
|
- Christian Hamilton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 APPENDIX F Receiving Water Conditions, Impacts of MS4 Discharges, and Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA
2 Intentionally Left Blank
3 Appendix F Receiving Water Conditions, Impacts of MS4 Discharges, and Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA Table of Contents \- I Table F-1 Table F-2 Table F-3 Page Receiving Water Conditions and Impacts of MS4 Discharges in the San Dieguito River WMA F-3 Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA Subwatersheds F-5 Evaluation of Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA F-9 Page F-i
4 Appendix F Receiving Water Conditions, Impacts of MS4 Discharges, and Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA \- I Intentionally Left Blank Page F-ii
5 Appendix F Receiving Water Conditions, Impacts of MS4 Discharges, and Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA This appendix contains details of the analysis of receiving water conditions (Section 2.1), impacts from MS4 discharges (Section 2.2), and the factors that were evaluated to develop the final list of priority water quality conditions and high priority water quality conditions. The information is presented in three tables, which are described below. Table F-1: Receiving Water Conditions and Impacts of MS4 Discharges in the San Dieguito River WMA Table F-1 presents all identified receiving water conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA and the potential impacts of the MS4 discharges. These conditions were identified as described in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 based on the considerations detailed in the table. These include: Available receiving water data (current or historic) or regulatory drivers that support the condition. A check mark in the table indicates that samples have exceeded water quality objectives or the (d) list or a TMDL identifies the waterbody as impaired. Where possible, the data were divided by temporal extent (wet- or dry-weather). Available current or historic MS4 indicating that the MS4 potentially causes or contributes to the condition. A check mark indicates that samples collected from the MS4 during wet- or dry-weather have exceeded water quality objectives. MS4 data from the subwatershed was typically used for this consideration; data for MS4 discharges directly to the receiving water body in question are rarely available. Identification of the MS4 as a source of the condition in the (d) list or a TMDL. The factors that led to the determination that the condition exists and was therefore included in the table. Table F-2: Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA Subwatersheds Table F-2 presents the following information for each priority water quality condition per the MS4 Permit (Provision B.2.b): The beneficial use impairment(s) associated with the priority water quality condition; The pollutant or stressor causing the beneficial use impairment, if known; The temporal extent of the priority water quality condition (dry and/or wet weather); Page F-1
6 Appendix F Receiving Water Conditions, Impacts of MS4 Discharges, and Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA The geographical extent of the priority water quality condition within the WMA, if known (based on the extent of the associated 303(d) listing or the location of the associated NPDES monitoring location); Lines of evidence leading to identification as a priority water quality condition, including evidence of MS4 discharges that may cause or contribute to the condition; and An assessment of the adequacy of the to characterize the factors causing or contributing to the priority water quality condition, including consideration of spatial and temporal variation. The table also lists the Responsible Agencies that potentially contribute to the condition. The contents of this table were determined by the assessment of the receiving water conditions and the MS4 impacts (presented in Table F-1). Table F-3: Evaluation of Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA As described in Section 2.3, priority water quality conditions that were identified based on the methodology presented in Appendix A. The remaining priority water quality conditions were evaluated based on several factors to determine if they warranted elevation to high priority water quality conditions for this iteration of the Water Quality Improvement Plan. Table F-3 summarizes this evaluation. The priority water quality condition must meet all of the following criteria to be considered a high priority water quality condition: Supporting data are sufficient to characterize the receiving water condition. To be sufficient, multiple samples collected under quality controlled monitoring must have exceeded water quality objectives. Storm water or non-stormwater runoff is a predominant source. Samples or observations collected under quality controlled monitoring programs must indicate that MS4 discharges are a predominant source of the receiving water condition. Controllable by Responsible Agencies. The pollutant or stressor must be within the authority of the Responsible Agency to control. To be considered controllable, there must be a clear link between the MS4 contribution and the receiving water condition, and the potential strategies to address the condition must be applicable to the geographic extent of the condition. Cannot be addressed by strategies identified for other high priority water quality condition s. The condition was not elevated to a high priority water quality condition if strategies identified for other high priority water quality conditions are expected to address the condition. Page F-2
7 Appendix F Receiving Water Conditions, Impacts of MS4 Discharges, and Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA Subwatershed Waterbody Condition San Dieguito River Above Sutherland Reservoir San Dieguito River Above Lake Hodges Santa Ysabel Creek (Above Sutherland Reservoir) Sutherland Reservoir Cloverdale Creek Green Valley Creek Kit Carson Creek Felicita Creek Near the NPDES Monitoring Stations Near the NPDES Monitoring Stations Table F-1 Receiving Water Conditions and Impacts of MS4 Discharges in the San Dieguito River WMA Receiving Water Data or Regulatory Drivers Support Consideration as a Receiving Water Condition Determining Factor(s) For Receiving Water Data MS4 Monitoring Data Indicates MS4 Impact Wet Wet MS4 Listed As Source on 303(d) or TMDL of WARM due to toxicity (d) Elevated to Priority Water Quality Condition? No; Toxicity cannot be identified as a priority water quality condition because the full impact of all environmental contributions including the MS4 have not been characterized. of MUN due to color (d) Wet, Yes of MUN due iron, manganese, and ph of WARM due to eutrophication 1 (nitrogen) of WARM due to eutrophication 1 (phosphorus) (d) (d) 1 of AGR due to TDS (d) and historical and current (d) and historical and current No; Iron not assessed under previous MS4 Permit. Manganese and ph were not elevated to a MS4 outfall priority by LTEA or WRMP. No; No MS4 data, and based on best professional judgment MS4 impacts on eutrophic conditions are not quantifiable. Yes Yes of MUN due to chloride (d) Yes of MUN due manganese and PCP of MUN due to sulfate (d) (d) and historical and current of MUN due to PCP (d) of MUN due to TDS (d) and historical and current of MUN due to aluminum (d) of MUN due to TDS 1 1 Fecal coliform exceedance at the NPDES receiving water (RW) stations Elevated Enterococcus levels at the NPDES RW stations Poor IBI scores at the NPDES RW stations Toxicity to C. dubia at the NPDES RW stations (d) and historical and current Historical and current and Bacteria TMDL at Pacific Ocean Shoreline Historical and current and Bacteria TMDL at Pacific Ocean Shoreline Historical and current Historical and current No; PCP not assessed under previous MS4 Permit. Manganese was not elevated to a MS4 outfall priority by LTEA or WRMP Yes No; PCP not assessed under previous MS4 Permit. Yes No; Aluminum not assessed under previous MS4 Permit Yes Yes Yes No; Poor IBI scores cannot be identified as a priority water quality condition because the full impact of all environmental contributions including the MS4 have not been characterized. No; Toxicity cannot be identified as a priority water quality condition because the full impact of all environmental contributions including the MS4 have not been characterized. Continued on next page Page F-3
8 Appendix F Receiving Water Conditions, Impacts of MS4 Discharges, and Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA Subwatershed Waterbody Condition Receiving Water Data or Regulatory Drivers Support Consideration as a Receiving Water Condition Determining Factor(s) For Receiving Water Data MS4 Monitoring Data Indicates MS4 Impact Wet Wet MS4 Listed As Source on 303(d) or TMDL Elevated to Priority Water Quality Condition? San Dieguito River Above Lake Hodges San Dieguito River Below Lake Hodges San Dieguito River Pacific Ocean Shoreline at San Dieguito Lagoon Mouth at San Dieguito River Beach 2 of MUN due to color (d), public input Wet, Yes of MUN due to manganese, ph, and mercury (d), public input of MUN due to turbidity (d) and historical data of MUN due to eutrophication 1 (nitrogen and phosphorus) impairment of REC-1 due Enterococcus impairment of REC-1 due to fecal coliform 1 of WARM due to toxicity of WARM conditions due to eutrophication (ammonia) of WARM due to eutrophication (nitrogen) of WARM due to TDS of SHELL due to total coliform impairment of REC-1 due to indicator bacteria (Enterococcus, fecal coliform, and total coliform) 1. Only listed as a dry weather condition based on best professional judgment that wet weather impacts are not quantifiable. 2. Fletcher outfall, upstream of these waterbodies, has a low flow diverter that could potentially reduce dry weather discharge. = Criterion applies to temporal extent. = Criterion does not apply to temporal extent (d) and historical, current and public input (d), historical and current, and Bacteria TMDL at Shoreline (d), historical monitoring data, and Bacteria TMDL at Shoreline (d) and historical and current (d) and public input No; Manganese and mercury not assessed under previous MS4 Permit. ph was not elevated to a MS4 outfall priority by LTEA or WRMP. No; no MS4 data to justify designation as priority water quality condition. Yes Wet, Yes Wet, Yes Wet, Yes No; No MS4 data, and based on best professional judgment MS4 impacts on eutrophic conditions are not quantifiable (d) and public input Yes (d) and historical and current (d) Yes No; no MS4 data to justify designation as priority water quality condition. Bacteria TMDL Wet, Yes Page F-4
9 Appendix F Receiving Water Conditions, Impacts of MS4 Discharges, and Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA Table F-2 Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA Subwatersheds Data Gaps (6) ly Responsible Agencies Priority Water Quality Condition (1) Stressor(s) (2) Temporal Extent (3) San Dieguito River Above Sutherland Reservoir of MUN in Sutherland Reservoir Color, Wet San Dieguito River Above impairment of WARM in Cloverdale Creek of AGR in Cloverdale Creek of MUN in Green Valley Creek Eutrophic conditions (phosphorus) TDS Chloride, Wet Geographical Extent (4) Determining Factors (5) Urban runoff/storm sewers listed in (d) as source Urban runoff/storm sewers listed in (d) as sources; current and historical receiving water for downstream waterbodies; historical subwatershed level outfall monitoring data Urban runoff/storm sewers listed in (d) as sources; current and historical receiving water for downstream waterbodies; historical subwatershed level outfall monitoring data Historical subwatershed level outfall ; current and historical MS4 outfall. RW 1 MS4 2 City of Del Mar (DM) City of Escondido (E) City of Poway (P) City of Solana Beach (SB) City of San Diego (SD) County of San Diego (CO) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Continued on next page Page F-5
10 Appendix F Receiving Water Conditions, Impacts of MS4 Discharges, and Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA Data Gaps (6) ly Responsible Agencies Priority Water Quality Condition (1) Stressor(s) (2) Temporal Extent (3) Geographical Extent (4) Determining Factors (5) RW 1 MS4 2 City of Del Mar (DM) City of Escondido (E) City of Poway (P) City of Solana Beach (SB) City of San Diego (SD) County of San Diego (CO) San Dieguito River Above of MUN in Green Valley Creek Sulfates Urban runoff/storm sewers and natural sources listed in (d) as source; historical SMC receiving water monitoring data (limited); historical subwatershed level outfall Y Y of MUN in Kit Carson Creek TDS Current and historical receiving water for downstream waterbodies; current and historical MS4 outfall. Y Y of MUN in Felicita Creek TDS Urban runoff/storm sewers/agricultural return flows/ flow regulation and modification listed in (d) as sources; current and historical receiving water for downstream waterbodies; historical subwatershed level outfall Y Y of REC-1 Above Fecal coliform Enterococcus Wet Near NPDES monitoring locations Current and historical receiving water for wet weather; subwatershed level outfall for wet weather; Bacteria TMDL Current and historical receiving water for dry weather; subwatershed level outfall for dry weather; Bacteria TMDL N Y N Y Continued on next page Page F-6
11 Appendix F Receiving Water Conditions, Impacts of MS4 Discharges, and Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA Data Gaps (6) ly Responsible Agencies Priority Water Quality Condition (1) Stressor(s) (2) Temporal Extent (3) San Dieguito River Above Geographical Extent (4) Determining Factors (5) RW 1 MS4 2 City of Del Mar (DM) City of Escondido (E) City of Poway (P) City of Solana Beach (SB) City of San Diego (SD) County of San Diego (CO) of MUN in Color Eutrophic conditions (nitrogen and phosphorus) Wet, San Dieguito River Below of REC-1 in San Dieguito River Indicator bacteria (Enterococcus and fecal coliform) Wet, and near NPDES monitoring locations (wet weather only) Urban runoff/storm sewers listed in (d) as source; public input Urban runoff/storm sewers listed in (d) as sources; current and historical receiving water and historical outfall ; public input Urban runoff as a potential source; current and historical receiving water Y Y N Y N Y of WARM in San Dieguito River Toxicity TDS Wet, and near NPDES monitoring locations (wet weather only) Urban runoff as a potential source; current and historical receiving water for downstream waterbodies Y 3 Y 3 Y 3 Y 3 Continued on next page Page F-7
12 Appendix F Receiving Water Conditions, Impacts of MS4 Discharges, and Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA Data Gaps (6) ly Responsible Agencies Priority Water Quality Condition (1) Stressor(s) (2) 1. Are there gaps in the RW data used to characterize the priority water quality condition? (Y = yes; N = no). 2. Are there gaps in the MS4 data used to characterize the geographical contribution of the MS4 to priority water quality condition? (Y = yes; N = no). 3. The impact of the MS4 is unknown. Temporal Extent (3) San Dieguito River Below of WARM in San Dieguito River of REC-1 at Pacific Ocean Shoreline of REC-1 at Pacific Ocean Shoreline Eutrophic conditions (nitrogen) Indicator bacteria (Enterococcus and fecal coliform) Indicator bacteria (Enterococcus and fecal coliform) Wet overflow Wet, Geographical Extent (4) Determining Factors (5) Urban runoff as a potential source; public input RW 1 MS4 2 DM = City of Del Mar; E = City of Escondido; P = City of Poway; SB = City of Solana Beach; SD = City of San Diego; CO = County of San Diego City of Del Mar (DM) City of Escondido (E) City of Poway (P) City of Solana Beach (SB) City of San Diego (SD) County of San Diego (CO) Y 3 Y 3 MS4 discharges Bacteria TMDL N Y Pacific Ocean Shoreline at San Dieguito Lagoon Mouth Bacteria TMDL N N Page F-8
13 Appendix F Receiving Water Conditions, Impacts of MS4 Discharges, and Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA Table F-3 Evaluation of Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA Subwatershed San Dieguito River Above Lake Sutherland Priority Water Quality Condition 1 of MUN in Sutherland Reservoir impairment of WARM in Cloverdale Creek of AGR in Cloverdale Creek Stressor(s) (a) Supporting Data Is Sufficient to Characterize the Receiving Water Conditions (b) Storm Water/ Non-Storm Water Runoff Predominant Source (c) Controllable by Responsible Agencies 2 (d) Cannot Be Addressed by Identified Strategies Color Eutrophic conditions (phosphorus) Total dissolved solids San Dieguito River Above of MUN in Green Valley Creek of MUN in Kit Carson Creek of MUN in Felicita Creek of REC-1 Above 3 Chloride Sulfates Total dissolved solids Total dissolved solids Fecal coliform Enterococcus Continued on next page Page F-9
14 Appendix F Receiving Water Conditions, Impacts of MS4 Discharges, and Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA Subwatershed Priority Water Quality Condition 1 Stressor(s) (a) Supporting Data Is Sufficient to Characterize the Receiving Water Conditions (b) Storm Water/ Non-Storm Water Runoff Predominant Source (c) Controllable by Responsible Agencies 2 (d) Cannot Be Addressed by Identified Strategies San Dieguito River Above San Dieguito River Below of MUN in of REC-1 (in San Dieguito River) 3 of WARM in San Dieguito River Color Eutrophic conditions (nitrogen and phosphorus) Indicator bacteria (Enterococcus and fecal coliform) Toxicity Total dissolved solids Eutrophic conditions (nitrogen) The criterion is met for the priority water quality condition. The criterion is not met for the priority water quality condition. 1. Priorities associated with a TMDL are considered high priority water quality conditions and are not included in this table 2. The priority water quality condition is considered controllable if two criteria are met: (1) There is a clear link between the MS4 contribution and the receiving water conditions, and (2) The potential strategies that apply to the potential stressor are applicable for the drainage area of the receiving water condition. 3. Bacteria TMDL only applicable at Pacific Ocean Shoreline. Page F-10
Water Quality Improvement Plan Provision B.2 Submittal: Priority Water Quality Conditions
JUNE 2017 [ REVISED DRAFT] SANTA MARGARITA RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AREA Water Quality Improvement Plan Provision B.2 Submittal: Priority Water Quality Conditions Submitted by COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, COUNTY
More informationSan Dieguito River Watershed Management Area Water Quality Improvement Plan. Submitted to the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board by:
San Dieguito River Watershed Management Area Water Quality Improvement Plan Submitted to the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board by: Prepared by: Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure,
More informationExecutive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. ES.1 Monitoring Program Objectives. ES.2 Summary of Monitoring Results
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.1 Monitoring Program Objectives The following are the major monitoring program objectives, as outlined in the Municipal Stormwater Permit: Assess compliance with the Municipal Stormwater
More informationCarlsbad Watershed Management Area Water Quality Improvement Plan
Carlsbad Watershed Management Area Water Quality Improvement Plan San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Order R9-2013-0001 Provisions B.2.a. and B.2.b. June 11, 2014 Prepared and Submitted by
More information4.0 SAN GABRIEL RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AREA
4.0 SAN GABRIEL RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AREA 4.1 Watershed Description 4.1.1 Watershed Land Use, Percent Impervious, and Population Land use in the San Gabriel River Watershed Management Area is approximately
More information5.0 LOS ANGELES RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AREA
5.0 LOS ANGELES RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AREA 5.1 Watershed Description 5.1.1 Watershed Land Use, Percent Impervious, and Population The Los Angeles Watershed Management Area has more than half its area
More informationMS4 MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.
MS4 MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. MS4 permit holders must report on the status of compliance with permit conditions, including a summary of any information
More informationMiddle Santa Ana River Bacterial Indicator TMDL 2009 Dry Season Report
Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial Indicator TMDL 2009 Dry Season Report December 31, 2009 on behalf of Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority San Bernardino County Stormwater Program County of Riverside
More informationBackground What is the Integrated Report (IR)? CWA Background
Department of the Environment Monday, September 8th, 2014 6:00 pm Montgomery Park, Lobby Conference Rooms Purpose of This Meeting Provide General Information/Updates on 2014 IR Encourage public dialogue,
More information1.1 MONITORING PROGRAM OBJECTIVES The major objectives of the Monitoring Program outlined in the Municipal Stormwater Permit are to:
1.1 MONITORING PROGRAM OBJECTIVES The major objectives of the Monitoring Program outlined in the Municipal Stormwater Permit are to: Assess compliance with the Los Angeles County Municipal Stormwater Permit
More informationRainbow Creek TMDL Monitoring Program Report for October 2016 through September 2017
Rainbow Creek TMDL Monitoring Program Report for October 2016 through September 2017 Introduction The Rainbow Creek monitoring program has been developed to provide water quality data in support of the
More informationLake Elsinore and Canyon Lake Watersheds Nutrient TMDL Monitoring Annual Report
Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake sheds Nutrient TMDL Monitoring 2016 2017 Annual Report Prepared for: Lake Elsinore & San Jacinto sheds Project Authority 11615 Sterling Avenue Riverside, California 92503
More informationMarina del Rey Enhanced Watershed Management Program Plan
Marina del Rey Enhanced Watershed Management Program Plan Prepared For: Marina del Rey Enhanced Watershed Management Program Agencies County of Los Angeles Los Angeles County Flood Control District City
More informationSanta Margarita River WQIP. Consultation Committee Meeting October 17, 2017
Santa Margarita River WQIP Consultation Committee Meeting October 17, 2017 1 Welcome and Introductions Responsible Agencies City of Menifee City of Murrieta City of Temecula City of Wildomar County of
More informationModel Monitoring Program for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems in Southern California
Model Monitoring Program for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems in Southern California A report from the Stormwater Monitoring Coalition s Model Monitoring Technical Committee August 004 Technical
More informationMonday, January 9th, :00 pm. Montgomery Park, Lobby Conference Rooms
Monday, January 9th, 2016 6:00 pm Montgomery Park, Lobby Conference Rooms Purpose of This Meeting Provide General Information/Updates on 2016 IR and MD s TMDL Prioritization Encourage public dialogue,
More informationADVANCES IN MICROBIAL SOURCE TRACKING FOR BACTERIA TMDLS Tony Hancock 1, Lisa Skutecki 1, Sean Porter 1
ADVANCES IN MICROBIAL SOURCE TRACKING FOR BACTERIA TMDLS Tony Hancock 1, Lisa Skutecki 1, Sean Porter 1 1 Brown and Caldwell, San Diego, California * Email: thancock@brwncald.com. ABSTRACT On February
More informationSECTION C11.0, WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND ANALYSIS
Table C-11-1: Pesticide detections frequencies above aquatic life benchmarks and concentrations summary statistics (ng/l) from samples collected during 2011-12 storm events % Detected Mean Min Max Pyrethroid
More informationLittle Cypress Bayou Special Study - Subwatershed 1.10
- Subwatershed 1.1 Sabine River Authority of Texas August 31, 21 Prepared in Cooperation with the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Under the Authorization of the Texas Clean Rivers Act Table
More information2018 Monitoring Strategy for the Des Plaines River Watershed. Purpose
2018 Monitoring Strategy for the Des Plaines River Watershed Purpose This Monitoring Strategy for the Des Plaines River Watershed in Lake County Illinois was developed by the Monitoring Committee of the
More informationSAN DIEGUITO RIVER WATERSHED URBAN RUNOFF MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 2003 CITY OF SAN DIEGO, LEAD AGENCY
SAN DIEGUITO RIVER WATERSHED URBAN RUNOFF MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 2003 CITY OF SAN DIEGO, LEAD AGENCY CITY OF DEL MAR CITY OF ESCONDIDO CITY OF POWAY CITY OF SOLANA BEACH COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CITY OF SAN
More informationSanta Margarita River WQIP. Consultation Committee Meeting September 7, 2016
Santa Margarita River WQIP Consultation Committee Meeting September 7, 2016 1 Welcome and Introductions Responsible Agencies Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Counties Riverside
More informationVancouver Watershed Health Assessment. Burnt Bridge Creek Watershed
Vancouver Watershed Health Assessment Burnt Bridge Creek Watershed Presentation Overview 1. Introduction 2. Study Context 3. Burnt Bridge Creek Monitoring Program and Trend Analysis 4. Watershed Health
More informationMiddle Santa Ana River Bacterial Indicator TMDL Implementation Report
Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial Indicator TMDL Implementation Report February 2013 on behalf of Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority San Bernardino County Stormwater Program County of Riverside Cities
More informationImpact of Orange County Sanitation District Wastewater Disinfection on Beach Water Quality
Impact of Orange County Sanitation District Wastewater Disinfection on Beach Water Quality Coastal Coalition March 27, 2014 Presented By: Dr. Samuel Choi Orange County Sanitation District Environmental
More informationAppendix A. Water Quality Town of Greenwich
Appendix A Quality Town of Town of Drainage Manual [This page left intentionally blank] Bodies Town of Horseneck Brook-01 Byram River- 01 Putnam Lake Reservoir () Inner - Indian Harbor (upper), Inner -
More informationReceiving Waters Monitoring Work Plan Guidance for the CSO Program. March, 2015
Receiving Waters Monitoring Work Plan Guidance for the CSO Program March, 2015 Background In accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency s (USEPA s) Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO)
More informationAPPENDIX C. Beneficial Uses of 303(d) Listed Waterbodies in the Los Peñasquitos WMA
APPENDIX C Beneficial Uses of 303(d) Listed Waterbodies in the Los Peñasquitos WMA Intentionally Left Blank Table C-1 presents the beneficial use designations of the 303(d) listed waterbodies in the Los
More informationA Modeling Framework for Linking Urban Stormwater Load Allocation, Implementation Plan, and BMP Design. Sen Bai, PhD, PE Jon Ludwig
A Modeling Framework for Linking Urban Stormwater Load Allocation, Implementation Plan, and BMP Design Sen Bai, PhD, PE Jon Ludwig Outline Background Modeling for non-point source management Modeling framework
More informationAppendix D Monitoring Program
Appendix D Monitoring Program [This page left intentionally blank.] Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Third Generation Watershed Management Plan Monitoring Program Minnesota
More informationNEWPORT BAY FECAL COLIFORM TMDL
NEWPORT BAY FECAL COLIFORM TMDL 2017 ANNUAL DATA REPORT SEPTEMBER 1, 2017 Prepared for: Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board to fulfill requirements of the TMDL for Fecal Coliform in Newport
More informationFactsheet: Town of Deep River Water Quality and Stormwater Summary
79 Elm Street Hartford, CT 06106-5127 www.ct.gov/deep Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer Factsheet: Town of Deep River Water Quality and Stormwater Summary This document was created for each
More informationCarlsbad and San Dieguito Watershed Workshop Notes Attendance Welcome and Introductions
Carlsbad and San Dieguito Watershed Workshop Notes 1:00 p.m. 2:30 p.m. City of Escondido, Mitchell Room 201 N. Broadway, Escondido, CA 92025 Attendance Alison Witheridge, City of Oceanside Bryand Duke,
More informationGrants Pass Water Quality Monitoring
Grants Pass Water Quality Monitoring 2003-2005 Rogue Valley Council of Governments April 2005 Rogue Valley Council of Governments Natural Resources Department 155 North First Street Central Point, Oregon
More informationArea. Kinnickinnic River 24.7 Menomonee River Milwaukee River Oak Creek 28.2 Root River Lake Michigan Direct 40.
Area Watershed (square miles) Kinnickinnic River 24.7 Menomonee River 135.8 Milwaukee River 700.0 Oak Creek 28.2 Root River 197.6 Lake Michigan Direct 40.7 Drainage Area Total 1,127.0 Number of Counties
More informationAcidity and Alkalinity:
Evaluation of Pollution Sources to Lake Glenville Quarterly Report December 2018 Kimberlee K Hall, PhD Environmental Health Program, Western Carolina University Summary Chemical and microbial analysis
More informationFOR THE DOMINGUEZ CHANNEL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AREA GROUP
Enhanced Watershed Management Program FOR THE DOMINGUEZ CHANNEL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AREA GROUP March 2015 Prepared by: Dominguez Channel Watershed Management Area Group City of Los Angeles County of Los
More informationFactsheet: City of West Haven Water Quality and Stormwater Summary
79 Elm Street Hartford, CT 06106-5127 www.ct.gov/deep Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer Factsheet: City of West Haven Water Quality and Stormwater Summary This document was created for each
More informationCollaboration Across Boundaries to Achieve Integrated Watershed Management
Collaboration Across Boundaries to Achieve Integrated Watershed Management A Means to Affordable Water Quality for the Saw Mill Run Watershed Ohio Water Environment Association Technical Conference June
More informationCHAPTER 7. San Dieguito River Flooding Adaptation
CHAPTER 7 San Dieguito River Flooding Adaptation This chapter includes a range of adaptation measures to address vulnerabilities from flooding along the San Dieguito River, including the river valley,
More informationPROTECTING OUR WATERWAYS: STORMWATER POLLUTION REDUCTION EFFORTS
PROTECTING OUR WATERWAYS: STORMWATER POLLUTION REDUCTION EFFORTS Public Information Meeting ~ May 2, 2018 Public Works Stormwater Management Division OVERVIEW Surface Water Quality Protection Municipal
More informationFactsheet: Town of East Lyme Water Quality and Stormwater Summary
79 Elm Street Hartford, CT 06106-5127 www.ct.gov/deep Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer Factsheet: Town of East Lyme Water Quality and Stormwater Summary This document was created for each
More informationEvidence-based Guidelines for Microbial Source Tracking Projects. September 5th, nd Annual Conference of INAFSM Evansville, IN
Evidence-based Guidelines for Microbial Source Tracking Projects September 5th, 2018 22nd Annual Conference of INAFSM Evansville, IN Providing Genetic & Analytic Solutions for Water Digital PCR Pathogens
More informationCHAPTER 3 FLOOD RELATED STUDIES
CHAPTER 3 FLOOD RELATED STUDIES Although the area has experienced regular flooding there have been few formal flood studies until more recently. There are a number of water quality studies in the basins.
More informationFINAL MA MS4 GENERAL PERMIT NEWTON TEDDER EPA REGION 1 BOSTON
FINAL MA MS4 GENERAL PERMIT NEWTON TEDDER EPA REGION 1 BOSTON PRESENTATION OVERVIEW HISTORY GENERAL OVERVIEW MS4 PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND CHANGES FROM THE DRAFT PERMIT EPA TOOLS DISCUSSION MASSDEP TOOLS
More informationMS4 Assessment Program to Satisfy Part V. Monitoring Requirements
MS4 Assessment Program to Satisfy Part V. Monitoring Requirements Submitted by City of Boynton Beach MS4 Permit No. FLS000018-004 The purpose of this document is to outline the City of Boynton Beach Stormwater
More informationA COOPERATIVE PROJECT OF THE CITIES OF ALISO VIEJO, LAGUNA BEACH, LAGUNA HILLS, LAGUNA NIGUEL, LAGUNA WOODS, LAKE FOREST, MISSION VIEJO, COUNTY OF
Exhiibiit 13 WATERSHED ACTIION PLAN ANNUAL REPORT Alliiso Creek Watershed 2006--07 Reporrtti ing Perri iod Novemberr 15,, 2007 A COOPERATIVE PROJECT OF THE CITIES OF ALISO VIEJO, LAGUNA BEACH, LAGUNA HILLS,
More informationAppendix B: Inventory of Data Sources
Appendix B: Inventory of Data Sources LIST OF DATA SOURCES AND REFERENCES TO SUPPORT WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR THE SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AREA November 4, 2015 Orange County
More informationWater Quality Monitoring Report. Tom Ash Assistant Director Water Management Division October 16, 2014
Water Quality Monitoring Report Tom Ash Assistant Director Water Management Division October 16, 2014 basic to any approach toward protections of the aquatic environment in the Tampa Bay area would be
More informationAmbient Water Quality Objectives For The Tributaries To Okanagan Lake Near Kelowna
Water Quality Ambient Water Quality Objectives For The Tributaries To Okanagan Lake Near Kelowna Overview Report Water Management Branch Environment And Resource Division Ministry Of Environment, Lands
More informationCASE STUDY OF INTEGRATED WATER QUALITY APPROACH IN CINCINNATI WATERSHED
CASE STUDY OF INTEGRATED WATER QUALITY APPROACH IN CINCINNATI WATERSHED DR. TING LU DEPUTY INTEGRATED PLANNING LEAD WET WEATHER IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVEN DURING DRY WEATHER, E. COLI HAS EXCEEDED THE WATER
More informationAPPENDIX O. Alternative BMP Implementation Scenario Methodology
APPENDIX O Alternative BMP Implementation Scenario Methodology Intentionally Left Blank APPENDIX O. ALTERNATIVE BMP IMPLEMENTATION SCENARIO METHODOLOGY An alternative modeling analysis was performed for
More information3B IMPAIRED WATERS AND TMDL APPROACH
3B IMPAIRED WATERS AND TMDL APPROACH 1. ISSUE Impaired waters are those waters that do not meet state water-quality standards for one or more pollutants, thus they are impaired for their designated uses.
More informationBackground. Oso Watershed Land Uses
Monitoring and Modeling of the Oso Creek and Oso Bay Watershed, Texas for a Bacteria TMDL Background Oso Creek and Oso Bay were identified as impaired segments in the 24 Texas Water Quality Inventory and
More informationNEWPORT BAY FECAL COLIFORM TMDL
NEWPORT BAY FECAL COLIFORM TMDL 2016 ANNUAL DATA REPORT SEPTEMBER 1, 2016 Prepared for: Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board to fulfill requirements of the TMDL for Fecal Coliform in Newport
More informationSouth Carolina Water Quality Standards. Heather Preston DHEC Bureau of Water October 14, 2008
South Carolina Water Quality Standards Heather Preston DHEC Bureau of Water October 14, 2008 The Water Quality Standards 303 (c) of the Clean Water Act requires all states to have water quality standards
More informationCity of Columbia. TMDL Monitoring and Assessment Plan
TMDL Monitoring and Assessment Plan Contents: 1 Introduction... 5 1.1 Motivation... 5 1.2 Sampling Procedures... 8 1.3 Program Schedule... 8 2 Gills Creek... 9 2.1 Reason for Monitoring... 9 2.2 Monitoring
More informationSABINE RIVER BASIN, TEXAS Sabine River Authority of Texas
SABINE RIVER BASIN, TEXAS Sabine River Authority of Texas Prepared in Cooperation with the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Under the Authorization of the Texas Clean Rivers Act October 1,
More informationTDS Dissolved ph Indicator Temperature Life Water (mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/l) Oxygen Range Bacteria 1 ( F) Supply (mg/l) (SU) #/100ml
USES RIO GRANDE BASIN Recreation Aquatic Domestic Other Cl -1 SO 4-2 Segment No. SEGMENT NAME CRITERIA TDS Dissolved ph Indicator Temperature Life Water (mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/l) Oxygen Range Bacteria 1 ( F)
More informationFactsheet: Town of Trumbull Water Quality and Stormwater Summary
79 Elm Street Hartford, CT 06106-5127 www.ct.gov/deep Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer Factsheet: Town of Trumbull Water Quality and Stormwater Summary This document was created for each town
More informationFactsheet: Town of Hamden Water Quality and Stormwater Summary
79 Elm Street Hartford, CT 06106-5127 www.ct.gov/deep Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer Factsheet: Town of Hamden Water Quality and Stormwater Summary This document was created for each town
More informationSanta Margarita River WQIP. Consultation Committee Meeting May 17, 2017
Santa Margarita River WQIP Consultation Committee Meeting May 17, 2017 1 Welcome and Introductions Responsible Agencies City of Menifee City of Murrieta City of Temecula City of Wildomar County of Riverside
More informationMiddle Santa Ana River Bacteria TMDL BMP Control Strategy and Prioritization Plan
Middle Santa Ana River Bacteria TMDL BMP Control Strategy and Prioritization Plan February 28, 2010 on behalf of Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority San Bernardino County Stormwater Program County of
More informationAPPENDIX I. Jurisdictional Strategies and Schedules
APPENDIX I Jurisdictional Strategies and Schedules Intentionally Left Blank Table of Contents I.1 City of Del Mar Strategies... I-3 I.2 City of Escondido Strategies... I-9 I.3 City of Poway Strategies...
More informationSection M CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL PLANS
CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL PLANS Table of Contents M.1 Water Management Planning in the... M - 1 Basin Plan...... M - 2 Water Supply Plans....... M - 2 Land Use Plans...... M - 4 Habitat Protection Plans........
More informationSection F: Evaluating Beneficial Use: Recreation Ohio Integrated Report
Section F: Evaluating Beneficial Use: Recreation 2008 Ohio Integrated Report F1. Background Prior to the 2002 IR, the reporting of recreational use impairment in Ohio was sporadic. Section 305(b) reports
More informationSouth Orange County Watershed Management Area Water Quality Improvement Plan Submitted to the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board By: The O
South Orange County Watershed Management Area Water Quality Improvement Plan Submitted to the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board By: The Orange County Copermittees (PIN 658018) which consists
More informationDry Weather Screening
May 2012 NPDES GUIDANCE for MS4s Dry Weather Screening for Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Prepared by the INAFSM Stormwater IDDE Group INAFSM IDDE Group The INAFSM IDDE Group is a forum for
More informationCity of Delray Beach MS4 Assessment Program: Part V. Monitoring Requirements MS4 Permit No. FLS
City of Delray Beach MS4 Assessment Program: Part V. Monitoring Requirements MS4 Permit No. FLS 000018 004 The purpose of this document is to outline the assessment program for the City of Delray Beach
More informationDOE/PPPO/ &D1 FBP-ER-PRO-WD-RPT-0001 Revision 3 April ENVIRONMENTAL NON-RADIOLOGICAL PROGRAM INFORMATION
5. ENVIRONMENTAL NON-RADIOLOGICAL PROGRAM INFORMATION 5.1 SUMMARY Non-radiological environmental monitoring at PORTS includes air, water, sediment, and fish. Monitoring of non-radiological parameters is
More informationLake Creek Watershed Management Plan Public Meeting. Arrowhead Lake May 3, :00 PM
Lake Creek Watershed Management Plan Public Meeting Arrowhead Lake May 3, 2018 6:00 PM Agenda I. Welcome and Introductions II. III. IV. Watershed Basics Overview of Lake Creek Watershed Elements of a Successful
More informationAmy M. Schofield Project Manager Boston Water and Sewer Commission November 2, 2017
Amy M. Schofield Project Manager Boston Water and Sewer Commission November 2, 2017 Boston Water and Sewer Commission s Collection Systems 206 Storm Drain Outfalls/Subcatchments 18 Interconnections 30
More informationAttachment 3: Impairments Unrelated to Stormwater
Attachment 3: Impairments Unrelated to Stormwater Attachment 3 includes 9 assessments of water bodies which MassDOT determined have impairments not stormwater related and therefore MassDOT will not review
More informationOCSD Urban Runoff Program SCAP Collection Systems in Motion
OCSD Urban Runoff Program SCAP Collection Systems in Motion Tom B. Meregillano Regulatory Specialist Orange County Sanitation District, CA OCSD Service Area Los Angeles Santa Ana San Diego Orange County,
More informationBacon Creek Watershed Plan Implementation Chapter 3: Learning More - Monitoring to Secure New Data Draft
Bacon Creek Watershed Plan Implementation Chapter 3: Learning More - Monitoring to Secure New Data Draft There are two main goals of watershed planning: protect good water quality and improve poor water
More informationGlobeville Landing Outfall Surface Water. December 12, 2017 Andrew Ross, Jon Novick Denver Department of Public Health & Environment
Globeville Landing Outfall Surface Water December 12, 2017 Andrew Ross, Jon Novick Denver Department of Public Health & Environment Introductions Andrew Ross Environmental Program Manager, DDPHE Jon Novick
More informationThe City of Cocoa (City) is located in east
FWRJ Reclaimed Water and Stormwater: A Perfect Pair to Meet Total Maximum Daily Load Wasteload Allocations? Danielle Honour, James Wittig, John A. Walsh, and Don Stevens Danielle Honour, P.E., D.WRE, and
More information7.1 Background. Define success; Guide the implementation and evaluation of programs; and
Section 7.0 Assessment Tools and Strategies 7.1 Background This section describes the development of Assessment Tools and Strategies, the last of four strategic planning components initially introduced
More informationTMDL: Search for Natural Source Exclusion EWELINA MUTKOWSKA COUNTY STORMWATER PROGRAM MANAGER
TMDL: Search for Natural Source Exclusion EWELINA MUTKOWSKA COUNTY STORMWATER PROGRAM MANAGER Presentation at California Marine Affairs & Navigation Conference (CMANC) January 15, 2015 Outline Background
More informationCoordinated Integrated Monitoring Program (CIMP)
APRIL 2014 DRAFT UPPER SANTA CLARA RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GROUP Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program (CIMP) prepared by LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 1 2 Santa Clara
More informationAppendix D Surface Water and Groundwater Quality Standards
Surface Water and Groundwater Quality Standards CLEAN WATER ACT The federal Clean Water Act (CWA) of 1972 and subsequent amendments require the identification and cleanup of polluted surface waters and
More informationCity of San Juan Capistrano. Agenda Report. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Steve May, Public Works and Utilities Director 4-tUA.
3/21/2017 E12 City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report TO: FROM: SUBMITTED BY: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ~Siegel, City Manager Steve May, Public Works and Utilities Director 4-tUA.--
More informationBUENA VISTA LAGOON RESTORATION FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS
BUENA VISTA LAGOON RESTORATION FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Objectives This report summarizes Task 1.3(b) Pollutant Source Analysis and Task 1.3(c) Sedimentation Analysis of the
More informationDry-season water quality in the San Gabriel River Watershed
Dry-season water quality in the San Gabriel River Watershed Drew Ackerman, Eric D. Stein and Kenneth C. Schiff ABSTRACT - Dry-season flow in the San Gabriel River system is comprised mostly of discharges
More informationALISO CREEK WATERSHED RUNOFF MANAGEMENT PLAN WATER QUALITY DATA ASSESSMENT 2013 ANNUAL REPORT ORANGE COUNTY STORMWATER PROGRAM
ALISO CREEK WATERSHED RUNOFF MANAGEMENT PLAN WATER QUALITY DATA ASSESSMENT 2013 ANNUAL REPORT ORANGE COUNTY STORMWATER PROGRAM Contents 1.0 Introduction... 1 2.0 Watershed Setting and BMPs... 2 3.0 BMP
More informationFinal TMDL Implementation Plan. Prepared for Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Wirth Lake Final TMDL Implementation Plan Prepared for Minnesota Pollution Control Agency September 2010 4700 West 77 th Street Minneapolis, MN 55435-4803 Phone: (952) 832-2600 Fax: (952) 832-2601 wq-iw11-03c
More informationEnhanced Watershed Management Program (EWMP) Final Work Plan
Ballona Creek Watershed Management Group Enhanced Watershed Management Program (EWMP) Final Work Plan Photo courtesy of: Jonathan Coffin, Inglewood, CA. Submitted on: June 25, 2014 Prepared by: City of
More informationMr. Leach Science Burrillville High School
Mr. Leach Science Burrillville High School The Clear River subwatershed, is located in northwestern Rhode Island. This subwatershed is a component of the Lower Blackstone River Watershed, the Blackstone
More informationPlanning and Implementation of Stormwater Projects in Ventura County
Planning and Implementation of Stormwater Projects in Ventura County Ewelina Mutkowska, MSc Ventura County Watershed Protection District October 11, 2017 Stormwater Projects Regulatory Drivers: NPDES MS4
More informationI. Apply Minimum Technology and Treatment Standards
Bureau of Point and Non-Point Source Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) 1 for Clean Water Program Establishing Effluent Limitations for Individual Industrial Permits SOP No. BPNPSM-PMT-032 Final,
More informationCity of Fairmont Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) January 23, 2017
City of Fairmont Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) January 23, 2017 Why is Water Quality Important? Water has always been important to Minnesota and is a key part of our history, culture, economy
More informationElsinore Valley Municipal Water District. Lake Elsinore Phase 2 Water Quality Monitoring Plan
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Lake Elsinore Phase 2 Water Quality Monitoring Plan to Evaluate the Efficacy of the In-Lake Nutrient Reduction Facilities (Aeration and Mixing) for Lake Elsinore
More informationWood Canyon Emergent Wetland Project. City of Aliso Viejo 12 Journey, Suite 100 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
Wood Canyon Emergent Wetland Project City of Aliso Viejo 12 Journey, Suite 100 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Introduction Wood Canyon is located within Aliso and Wood Canyon Regional Park in southwest Orange County,
More informationSetting Wasteload Allocations in a TMDL
Setting Wasteload Allocations in a TMDL wq-strm7-84a Stormwater Module 4b Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Training Goals 1. Define wasteload allocation (WLA) 2. Understand the relationship between stormwater
More informationMorro Bay National Estuary Program s Implementation Effectiveness Program For the Morro Bay Watershed. Stormwater Monitoring Report 2015
Morro Bay National Estuary Program s Implementation Effectiveness Program For the Morro Bay Watershed Stormwater Monitoring Report 215 Loan Agreement Number 12-81-55 Task 3.4 Submitted by Morro Bay National
More informationCITY OF SAN DIEGO COMMENTS ON THE SAFARI HIGHLANDS RANCH PROJECT (SUB ).
Attn: John Helmer 201 North Broadway Escondio, CA 92025 Submitted via email to: Jhelmer@escondido.org Subject: CITY OF SAN DIEGO COMMENTS ON THE SAFARI HIGHLANDS RANCH PROJECT (SUB 15-0019). The City of
More informationTotal Maximum Daily Load Restoration Plan for Bacteria Anne Arundel County February 2016 Draft Submittal. Response to MDE Comments of May 19, 2015
Anne Arundel County Response to MDE Comments of May 19, 2015 1. Introduction Anne Arundel County (the County) currently has 19 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)- approved bacteria Total Maximum
More informationSeptic System Impacts on Stormwater and Impaired Waterbodies. December 8, 2016 Tim Denison, Johnson Engineering Marcy Frick, Tetra Tech
Septic System Impacts on Stormwater and Impaired Waterbodies December 8, 2016 Tim Denison, Johnson Engineering Marcy Frick, Tetra Tech Presentation Overview Charlotte County: Many areas adjacent to impaired
More informationTOOLS FOR MS4s: REGULATIONS FOR E. COLI
INTRODUCTION Fecal indicator bacteria, such as E. coli (Escherichia coli), are used to determine whether streams and lakes are suitable for recreational use. Most E. coli bacteria are harmless, occur naturally
More informationFinal Report August 2005
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of Report and Project Background National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting requirements are mandated by the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA). In 1987,
More information