Overview of Federal Technology Demonstration Programs. Technology Track. Tim Tetreault, CEM Program Manager ESTCP Energy and Water August 9, 2016

Transcription

1 Technology Track Overview of Federal Technology Demonstration Programs Overview of the ESTCP Energy & Water Program Tim Tetreault, CEM Program Manager ESTCP Energy and Water August 9, 2016 Rhode Island Convention Center Providence, Rhode Island

2 About the Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP) Established in 1995 to: Improve DoD s environmental performance Reduce costs Enhance and sustain mission capabilities Demonstration & validation focus Help technologies over the Valley of Death Energy & Water is one of five ESTCP Program Areas Energy & Water Environmental Restoration Resource Conservation & Climate Change Weapons Systems & Platforms Munitions Response 2

3 Energy & Water Program Overview Objective Meet energy/water goals and mandates Reduce energy/water costs Enhance/sustain mission: Energy security Approach DoD facilities as Test Bed for innovative technologies Annual solicitations for technologies and solutions to DoD energy challenges Annual budget of approximately $20M 3

4 DoD Energy Use ESTCP Focus DoD Facility & Operational Energy Cost: $16.7B (FY15) Military Installation Energy Consumption 77% $12.8B 23% $3.9B ESTCP Test Bed Focus Natural Gas 31% Fuel Oil 8% Coal 6% Steam 2% Other 0.1% LPG 1% Operational Energy Electricity 48% Fleet Fuel 4% Facility Energy 4

5 ESTCP Strategic Directions Smart and Secure Installation Energy Management Microgrids Energy Storage Ancillary Service Markets Efficient Integrated Buildings Design, Retrofit, Operate Enterprise Optimized Investment Advanced Components Intelligent Building Management Distributed Generation Cost Effective On Site Emphasis on Renewables 5

6 Technology Demonstrations Technologies targeted for ESTCP funding: Can significantly benefit from a demonstration on a DoD installation. Require a demonstration to properly assess the cost and performance of the technology Will utilize information from the demonstration to accelerate commercialization and broader adoption Technologies not appropriate for ESTCP funding: Already commonly used across DoD Have well established operational cost and performance. 6

7 Energy Technology Maturity ESTCP Investments Invention Translation Adoption Diffusion R&D Initial prototype TRL 3 6 Product development Beta prototype TRL 7 9 Pilot production Pre commercial TRL 9 Full scale production Commercial product TRL 9 Performance & Cost Industry, supply chain, & support Translation Adoption Diffusion Value proposition or price is unclear or ill defined. Developers required for demonstration. Building industry not engaged. Value and risks understood by specialist or for some applications. Limited or no independent validation. Limited commercial availability. Support and distribution partnerships not well developed. Risks and value understood for most applications. Education of broader community underway. Technology is available and sustainable but not usually specified.

8 Solicitation Process Department of Defense Call Broad Agency Announcement Call Federal Organizations Outside DoD Call Pre Proposal Full Proposal Oral Briefing Selections 8

9 Annual Solicitation Cycle Project Start Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec FY 16 FY17 Topics Released Pre-Proposals Received Pre-Proposals Reviewed & Selected Selection Meeting Full Proposals FY17 FY18 Topics Discussed 9

10 Demonstration Process Demonstration Site Focus on Tech Transfer Formal Demonstration Plan Demonstration Baseline, Installation, Data acquisition Reporting Approval Final Report, Cost &Performance Report Objectives and metrics Cost and performance under true conditions Regulatory and end user acceptance Guidance and training 10

11 DoD Energy Technology Transfer Multiple Mechanisms ESPC & PPA Milcon & ECIP SRM & Service O&M Mechanisms have different paths ECIP & SRM Steps ESTCP looks to all paths Partnered with Services DOE and GSA 11

12 ESTCP EW Projects Technology Area Projects Cyber Security, Microgrids and Energy Storage 31 Renewable Energy Generation 18 Advanced Components to Improve Building Efficiency 37 Advanced Building Energy Management and Control Technologies 22 Tools and Processes for Design Assessment and Decision Making 12 Water Conservation 5 Total 125 Active 70 12

13 Smart and Secure Installation Energy Management Projects (Microgrid Energy Storage Demand Response/Ancillary Services) Army Navy USAF USMC Microgrid & Storage 13

14 Efficient Integrated Buildings Projects (Advanced Components, Controls, Design, Optimized Investment, Water) Army Navy USAF USMC Building 14

15 Distributed Generation Projects Army Navy USAF USMC Solar Biomass Geothermal Waste to Energy Waste Heat Recovery 15

16 Example Project: Coupling GHP with Underground Seasonal Thermal Energy Storage (USTES) Technology: Combines Geothermal Heat Pumps (GHPs) with new (to US) Underground Thermal Energy Storage (UTES) for increased efficiency Reversible loop flow with concentric thermal zones, heat recovery chillers, adiabatic dry coolers, continuous underground fiber optic temperature sensing (DTS), free low temp hot water (105 F) Demonstrations: Marine Corps Logistics Base Albany, GA 1 Fort Benning, GA Results: 50% Reduction in HVAC kbtu/ft 2 Avoided 4.3M gal/yr of cooling tower water Navy investing in 3 additional installations 1 elliptical BTES being designed for VA Increased inside the fence Energy Security Red shading represents cold discharging (heat into BTES) Diurnal Cold Storage Late Fall 2015 Blue Shading is cold charging of the BTES (Typ.) Seasonal Cold Storage Winter

17 Example Project: Microgrid with Fast Load Shedding and Ancillary Services Technology: Loss of utility, PNS 13.2kV grid islands, but facility loads exceed capacity of the existing 5 10MW CHP plant. Combining BESS and MCS technologies provide FLS capability to match critical loads to on site generation for grid stability. Demonstration: Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, NH Results: Project Number: EW Detection of loss of utility FLS correctly calculated load to be shed. System islanding initiated in < 1 ms Load shed initiated in < 2 ms and cleared in 32 ms from LoU 17

18 Website: estcp.org Follow Us On: 18