NRC Protective Measures Team Fukushima Challenges; RASCAL 4.2 Update
|
|
- Daniel Lewis
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 NRC Protective Measures Team Fukushima Challenges; RASCAL 4.2 Update National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference Lou Brandon April 24, 2012
2 EPA Protective Action Guidelines US Protective Action Decisions occur during Early Phase (0-96 hrs), Intermediate Phase (96 hrs- few months), and Late Phase (beyond few months). Evacuation and sheltering, relocation, and ingestion pathway modeling considerations are explored. Reflecting on the Fukushima incident can provide valuable insight into the challenges we might face in this country. 2
3 NRC Response Teams Executive Team Reactor Safety Team Protective Measures Team Does Independent assessment of Licensee Protective Action Recommendations. Liaison Team Safeguards Team Support Teams 3
4 Quake & Tsunami All times in this presentation are Japan Time 3/11, 14:46 Quake 18:00 Fukushima Unit 1, cooling issues Japan Times 5/16 19:30 Fuel rod damage 3/12 6:50 Unit 1 core significantly damaged (quake +16 hours) Core melt sequence still being analyzed 15:36 Explosion (quake + 25 hours) TEPCO Press release 3/13 19:00 Injecting Seawater Unit 1 NYT June 12 4
5 Initial NRC Assessments Informed water level 50 cm below fuel top Rough starting point - model 10% core melt 3/12, 14:53, Unit 1 Explodes RASCAL: using Generic Fukushima location Total fuel melt, 100%/hr release EPA PAGs exceeded beyond 50 miles Winds and forecast primarily from the SW 21:00 1 st RASCAL run,10% core melt, unfiltered, roughly models ground data 5
6 What is RASCAL? 6
7 Release Pathway 7
8 Example: Thyroid dose to 10 miles for 4 mph - D stability V3.0.5 V4.0 Much Improved Atmospheric and Transport Dispersion Model in V4 8
9 RASCAL model differences in thyroid doses for a core uncovered scenario with differing met conditions Conditions Ratio R4/R305 for thyroid dose at 5 miles 4 mph, D stability 27% 15 mph, B stability 31% 4 mph, G stability 16% 8 mph, D stability, Rain 24%
10 Public Health & Safety 1 st Priority Radiological details of degrading situation were sparse and inconsistent 3/14 Unit 3 Explodes (11:01, winds at times to the SSW toward Tokyo) INPO Report 3/15 Unit 2 loud noise & Unit 4 explode (06:00) Note - (JAEA International Workshop, 2/22-23/2012) estimated release from Unit 2, 1E+17 Bq/h, 13:00-17:00, on March 15, toward NW, or about 10.8E+6 Ci total. 10
11 Protective Action Decisions IAEA June 3/11 20:50 Fukushima Prefecture U1 lost cooling 18:00 Evacuate 2 km radius around Dai-ichi 21:23 NER HQ Prime Minister Nuclear Emergency Response HQ Evacuate 3 km radius, shelter to 10 km 3/12 05:44 Evacuate 10 km radius (Unit 1 Containment pressure increasing) 18:25 Evacuate to 20 km (15:36 explosion) Winds still blowing off shore from the west 3/15 11:00 Shelter 20 to 30 km radius 11
12 Ground Contamination Level? Ministry of Education, Sports, Culture, Science and Technology (MEXT) Difficulty first staging field teams 3/14 30 µsv/h in some areas (1 st data) IAEA Approximately 4-5 µsv/h from deposition in an early release scenario equates to the 20 msv annual relocation dose limit 12
13 Measurements beyond 100 miles Swipes indicate Cs and I present Air samples collected initial estimates Approx 3-17 mrem/hr Thyroid CDE 12 hr TEDE: 20 mrem, Thyroid CDE: 200* How long will the releases last? What protective actions are appropriate? * Calculation confirmed 13
14 Early Insights, Meteorological Data Were Limited From 3/16-3/18 wind forecast was from NW and W Chart can be re-constructed from online MEXT Data 14
15 US Travel Advisory Situation deteriorating quickly Lack of information from Japan US NRC recommends 50 mile evacuation zone 3/16 3/15 20: µsv/h Namie (20 km NW) IAEA 3/22 RASCAL reconstruction w/flyover data Models 290 µsv/h at 22 km, 3/15 20:45 TEDE km (20 miles) Thyroid CDE km (10 miles) Thyroid CDE km (with out rain) 15
16 Coordination DOE\NARAC NRC sent parts of source terms to NARAC Office of Science and Technology Policy Naval Reactors US Embassy in Japan Other Federal Agencies Canada\France\UK & others 3/15 23:00 Japan officially accepts US help DOE AMS deploys 16
17 RASCAL Modeling Limitations Limited to assess 1 unit at a time Limited: ad hoc approach to % fuel melt Limited: 48 hour calculation (release) time Can t view deposition/gr values beyond 48 h Limited: 48 hour holdup time before release Containment Source term held up 24 h -> ~ 3% Limited: only 1 fresh batch in SFP No original saved case preservation Saved cases did not identify creator 17
18 First Flyover on 5/17 between Dai-ichi and Tokyo area 18
19 U2 33% Core Damage/Melt based on Flyover Data Wind forecast was mph toward NW for about 12 hrs during 3/15 PM RASCAL reconstruction Light rain over 12 hours reduced long range impacts 19
20 Plume Phase Dose Projections 1.6E+07 Ci 20
21 US Travel Advisory 3/16 DOS authorizes voluntary departure from US Embassy, Yokohama, other areas 4/14 lifted voluntary departure allowing US dependants to return We continue to recommend that U.S. citizens avoid travel within the 50-mile radius of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant. U.S. citizens who are still within this radius should evacuate or shelter in place. 3/16/2011 NRC press release 21
22 Deliberate Evacuation Area 4/22 30 days to move out Evacuation Prepared Areas By 3/22 Hospital and Nursing Homes relocated voluntary evacuation requested of others (lifted September 30) Evacuation Area 4/22 Restricted with Penalties 22
23 2nd Year Relocation Guidance (500 mrem) also corresponds to yellow zone. Japanese acted to relocate 20 msv/yr (Red) zone. 23
24 In USA, is 2 nd Yr PAG limiting? Ideally, 2 nd year relocation zone may shrink due to decay and weathering to become no larger than 1 st year zone at the beginning of the 2 nd year. RASCAL predicts (with weathering) 2000 mrem 1 st year would become about 1300 mrem 2 nd year (might not get to 500 mrem). Could decrease in Fukushima dose rates suggest that ideal may occur? 24
25 Soil Sample (5/1, released 5/31) Sample Data Sample ID: Sample desc: Sample type: Oaza 7 km W Soil Ground concentrations Nuclide Ground Conc ( Bq/m²) I E+06 Cs-137* 1.20E+06 Cs E+06 Cs E+04 Sr E+03 Sr E+02 Te-129m 1.75E+06 Soil samples were taken by MEXT, 5 cm diameter, 15 cm deep. Lab results were converted to surface deposition and modeled with RASCAL Intermediate Phase Doses ( rem) 1st Yr Exposure 1st Year 2nd Year 50 Years with Delay Groundshine 5.35E E E E+00 Inhalation 5.88E E E E-05 Total 5.35E E E E+00 Notes Reentry delay was 90 days 1st year PAG = 2 rem, 2nd year objective = 0.5 rem, 50 year objective = 5 rem 25
26 RASCAL Models Ground Deposition Soils Collected 6/6-7/8 RASCAL reconstruction (slide 19) predicts a Cs-137 concentration of about 3600 KBq/m 2 at 30 km, center line NW. (within factor of 2) 26
27 MEXT Monitoring Points 6/17/11(~25%) MEXT Data Pt 32 Pt 33 Pt 79 (~30 km NW) (µsv/h) (µsv/h) (µsv/h) 3/25/ /17/ /16/ /31/ Is the large decrease in rates from December 16 due to weathering? This is apparently from snow cover in January. 27
28 May 6, 2011 (measured 4/6-29) Dose rate at the beginning of the 2 nd year that will yield 500 mrem/yr from Cesiums is about 1.0 usv/h based on RASCAL projections 28
29 September 12, 2011 (measured 8/16-28) Now it is the dark green area that corresponds to the 2 nd Year Relocation Zone (shrinking). 29
30 Not much change in the dark green area that corresponds to the 2 nd Year Relocation Zone (still shrinking?). 11/1/2011 Legend Air dose rate at 1 m above ground level (Sv/h) [Converted into the value as of November 1] 30
31 Factoring in weathering and a 40% sheltering credit for time indoors, additional 2nd year relocation concerns are minor. Figure 6: Areas corresponding guidance for relocation in the first year and any year after the first year where it has been assumed that there is some reduction in dose because of time spent indoors. It is assumed that the dose integration time for the first year would span from 15 November 2011 through 14 November
32 Relocation Decision Practice Relocate 1 st year zone based on 2 rem/yr Can predict where 2 nd year may be exceeded But may underestimate all reduction effects May be premature to relocate 2 nd year zone at the beginning of the 1 st year. Helpful government and public remediation efforts may occur. Higher dose levels may be acceptable for the circumstances 32
33 50 Mile Zone Relaxation 5/16 US Updates Travel Advisory Highway and Train, Tokyo to Sendai, Open 6/6, Coast Guard announced vessels should avoid transiting waters within 20 km (relaxed 50 mile - water) 7/19 Sendai airport cleared for US citizen use US DOS, Oct 7, 2011: Based on current data from Japan, we recommend that U.S. citizens avoid all unnecessary travel to areas within 20 kilometers of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant. In addition, U.S. citizens should avoid all unnecessary travel to the area northwest of the plant that the Government of Japan has designated as the Deliberate Evacuation Area. 33
34 Food Protective Actions Guidelines Nuclear Safety Commission of Japan Provisional values updated 2007 Indices relating to limits on food and drink ingestion Nuclide Radioactive iodine Index values relating to ingestion limits in guidelines for coping with disasters at nuclear facilities etc. (Bq/kg) Drinking water 300 Milk, dairy products* Vegetables (Except root vegetables and tubers) 2000 Drinking water Radioactive cesium Milk, dairy products 200 (Sum of Cs-134 and Vegetables Cs-137) Grains Meat, eggs, fish, etc. 500 * Provide guidance so that materials exceeding 100 Bq/kg are not used in milk supplied for use in powdered baby formula or for direct drinking to baby. US FDA Derived Intervention Levels (Bq/kg) Radionuclide Group DIL Sr I Cs group 1200
35 Samples Water 3/23 Press Release Water supply exceeding the level of the Index values for infants (radioactive iodine) (Reference 3): Kawamata-machi (town) Water Supply Utility: 1 point, 174 Bq/kg (on March km NW), Minamisoma-shi (city) Water Supply Utility: 1 point, 137 Bq/kg (March km N), and Iwaki-shi (city) Water Supply Utility: 1 point, 103 Bq/kg (March km S) Water supply exceeding the Index values for infants (radioactive iodine) (Reference 3): Kanamachi Treatment Plant (1 point, 210 Bq/kg (March km SW)) After receiving the survey results, the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare (MHLW) requested that Iwaki-shi (city) and Tokyo Metropolitan Government inform their residents using water supply in the relevant areas in Iwaki-shi (city) and Tokyo to refrain from having infants intake tap water (including giving infants formula milk dissolved by tap water, etc.) today. City Distance Water (km) (Bq/kg) Kawanata-machi 59 NW 174 Minamisoma-shi 29 N 137 Iwaki-shi 52 S 103 Kanamachi 238 SW 210?
36 Samples - Food I-131, Cs-134, Cs June-11 Fukushima Iwaki-shi 13-June-11 lefteye flounder ND June-11 Fukushima Iwaki-shi 13-June-11 slime flounder ND June-11 Fukushima Iwaki-shi 13-June-11 righteye flounder ND June-11 Fukushima Iwaki-shi 13-June-11 stone flounder ND June-11 Fukushima Iwaki-shi 13-June-11 spotted halibut ND June-11 Fukushima Iwaki-shi 13-June-11 hippoglossoides dubius ND June-11 Fukushima Iwaki-shi 13-June-11 horse mackerel ND June-11 Fukushima Iwaki-shi 13-June-11 greenling ND June-11 Fukushima Iwaki-shi 13-June-11 brown hakeling ND June-11 Fukushima Iwaki-shi 13-June-11 greeneyes ND June-11 Fukushima Iwaki-shi 13-June-11 japanese common flying squid ND ND June-11 Fukushima Iwaki-shi 13-June-11 swimming crab June-11 Fukushima Iwaki-shi 13-June-11 hen-clam ND June-11 Fukushima Iwaki-shi 13-June-11 abolone June-11 Fukushima Iwaki-shi 13-June-11 northern sea urchin ND Cs limit 200 Bq/kg (includes 10% allowance for Sr) Ocean bottom feeders exceeding limits? Make sense?
37 Food Controls MLHW Press Release 4/4/2011 In General: Prefectures guide local/district sampling Sample food types once per week Adjust frequency as needed Multiple samples, multiple areas, averages Nat l, Prefecture, and private laboratories Foods embargoed by type Food must pass three successive tests
38 Fukushima City Asian Leaders Japan Times 5/22
39 Progress of the Roadmap for Immediate Actions for the Assistance of Residents Affected by the Nuclear Incident NER HQ, November 17, 2011, P 11 5) Implementation of monitoring for radioactive materials in food and tap water - Regarding radioactive materials in food and tap water, the relevant local 12 governments are conducting ongoing examinations, and the results are being disclosed daily by the Government. (*) Of the 49,474 cases of examination for food, 865 cases exceeded the provisional regulation limit (as of November 5), and of 56,833 cases of examination for tap water, 69 cases exceeded the indicator values (as of November 4). There have been no instances of tap water level exceeding the limit since March 30.
40 New Radiation Safety Levels The Japanese government has announced new radiation exposure and ingestion limits targeted to become law in April. The current level for food cesium contamination in food, currently set at 500 Bq/Kg, will be lowered to 100. The limit for milk will be brought down from 200 Bq/l to 50, and for drinking water the new limit will be just 10 Bq/l, down from
41 RASCAL 4.2 Released 3/26/2012 User Interface Very Similar Release Notes Include Details of many fixes, updates and improvements 41
42 Intermediate Phase Doses (rem) Pathway 1st Year 2nd Year 50 Years Groundshine (FGR-12) 1.58E E E+01 Submersion (FGR-12) 4.41E E E-05 Effective Inhalation (FGR-11) 2.48E E E-03 Total 1.59E E E+01 Delay TEDE Remainder (rem) Before 168 h/wk in area with 0% in bldg Return 1st Year 2nd Year 50 Year 0 d 1.59E E E+01 1 d 1.58E E E+01 2 d 1.58E E E+01 4 d 1.56E E E+01 7 d 1.55E E E d 1.53E E E d 1.51E E E d 1.43E E E d 1.28E E E d 1.13E E E d 7.21E E E d 3.52E E E y 0.00E E E y 7.76E E y 4.96E E y 2.36E E y 0.00E E y 7.30E y 6.70E y 6.21E y 4.62E y 2.73E y 1.47E y 6.00E-01 FM Dose screen Example 10 µci/m 2 Cs-137* and 10 µci/m 2 Cs-134 Return after 10 years would yield less than 5 rem in next 40 years. 42
43 RASCAL TurboFRMAC Consistency 43
44 Different Iodine DCFs The iodine DCFs are different because the RASCAL Iodine DCFs are a weighted average of the 1 micron particle DCFs (25%) and the vapor DCFs (75%) whereas the TF 2011 DCFs are the 1 micron particle DCFs. The weighting of the vapor and particle DCFs in RASCAL is based on the RASCAL assumption related to the forms of iodine in the environment [25% particle, 35% reactive gas (e.g. I 2 ), 40% non-reactive gas (CH 3 I)].
45 V4.2 Source Term Re-construction Table 1.14 RASCAL 4.2 Estimates of Fukushima I-131 and Cs-137 Releases Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Total I-131 Inventory (Bq) 1.36E E E E+18 I-131 Release (Bq) 4.85E E E E+17 I-131 Release Fraction 3.6% 4.0% 2.4% 3.3% Cs-137 Inventory (Bq) 1.02E E E E+17 Cs-137 Release (Bq) 4.10E E E E+16 Cs -137 Release Fraction 4.0% 5.1% 3.0% 4.1% The important point is that this analysis demonstrates that RASCAL has sufficient flexibility to make reasonable estimates of the Fukushima release rates even with the complexity of the accident scenario. Van Ramsdell, RASCAL Tech Doc 45
46 Importance Version 1.0 March 28, radionuclides Relative Importance of Pathways Days gs 1.000E E E E E E E E+00 cs 3.957E E E E E E E E-08 inh 1.159E E E E E E E E-05 Importance to dose at t = 0. days Ground shine Inhalation Submersion 1 I I I I Sr I Rb Pu I I Sr Kr Cs I Xe Te Cm I Te-131m Te Rb La Cs Xe Cs Ce-144* Cs I Cs-137* Te Sr Ru-106* Te-131m Ba Ba La Sb I Cs Importance to dose at t = days Ground shine Inhalation Submersion 1 Cs-137* Sr Cs-137* Cs Pu Cs Y Am Y Sr Cs-137* Sr Ru-106* Cs Ru-106* Am Y Am Ce-144* Pu Ce-144* Pu Ru-106* Pu Pr Pu Pm Pm Ce-144* Pr Pu Pm Pu Pu Cm Pu Cm Te-127m Cm Prototype: Bad Actors Ranked by Dose over Eight Time Intervals and Three Pathways 46
47 On the Horizon Standard Interface for importing or exporting of source terms. Prototype for processing multiple units Restructure RASCAL to run for longer time frames Include State of the Art Reactor Consequence Analysis (SOARCA) source terms Improved alliance with NARAC and others 47
48 Questions Lou Brandon Athey Consulting (304)
Nuclear Emergency Preparedness and Response in Japan following Fukushima Accident
Regional Workshop on Observing a Nuclear. Radiological Emergency Exercise Nuclear Emergency Preparedness and Response in Japan following Fukushima Accident October, 2013 Seihiro ITOYA, Ph. D. Nuclear Emergency
More informationICRP Symposium on the International System of Radiological Protection
ICRP Symposium on the International System of Radiological Protection October 24-26, 2011 Bethesda, MD, USA Toshimitsu Homma ICRP Committee 4 Evolution from ICRP 60 to ICRP 103 ICRP 60 (1991), ICRP 63
More informationAPPENDIX B. Frequently Asked Questions: Section III, Health Physics
APPENDIX B Frequently Asked Questions: Section III, Health Physics NOTES: All questions and answers in this appendix relate to the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station. Unless otherwise indicated, all
More informationRadionuclide Release at Fukushima
Radionuclide Release at Fukushima Peter F. Caracappa, Ph.D., CHP American Nuclear Society Connecticut Section November 16, 2011 Overview Accident Review Radioactive Material Releases Transport and Deposition
More informationEliminating Negative Reputation Impact
Eliminating Negative Reputation Impact ~ Reconstruction from Nuclear Disaster & the History of Safety and Revitalization of Fukushima ~ October, 217 New Stage towards Reconstruction & Revitalization Changes
More informationDr. Keiji Kijima Secretary General IPEC Japan
Dr. Keiji Kijima Secretary General IPEC Japan * *I wish to express my gratitude to the good will sent to the Tohoku and Kanto earthquake. The Japanese Pharmacopoeia 16 th Edition was promulgated in March
More informationThe Great East Japan Earthquake and Efforts to ensure the Safety of Food
The Great East Japan Earthquake and Efforts to ensure the Safety of Food June 30, 2011 Government of Japan 1 Japan Faces an Unprecedented Challenge (Enormous Earthquake, Tsunamis and Nuclear Accident)
More informationJapan s Nuclear Emergency - Update - April 6, 2011 Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Government of Japan
Japan s Nuclear Emergency - Update - April 6, 2011 Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Government of Japan Table of Contents A. Japan Faces an Unprecedented Challenge (Enormous Earthquake, Tsunamis
More informationHOW TO FACE CONCERNS OF RADIATION EFFECTS
1 Provisional Translation Document 2 Second Meeting Working Group on Voluntary Efforts and Continuous Improvement of Nuclear Safety, Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy HOW TO FACE CONCERNS
More informationRadiological Dose Assessment using RESRAD Code: Case Study, Fukushima Accident for Soil and Public
Radiological Dose Assessment using RESRAD Code: Case Study, Fukushima Accident for Soil and Public H. B. Hassan and *M. H. Othman Siting & Environmental Department -*Radiation control Department, Nuclear
More informationAnnex I of Technical Volume 5 EVOLUTION OF REFERENCE LEVELS FOR REMEDIATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF A FRAMEWORK FOR POST-ACCIDENT RECOVERY
Annex I of Technical Volume 5 EVOLUTION OF REFERENCE LEVELS FOR REMEDIATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF A FRAMEWORK FOR POST-ACCIDENT RECOVERY I 1. DEFINITION OF REFERENCE LEVELS FOR REMEDIATION This annex describes
More informationGunter Pretzsch - Thorsten Stahl. Radiological Situation at the Chernobyl Shelter Site Thirty Years after the Accident
Gunter Pretzsch - Thorsten Stahl Radiological Situation at the Chernobyl Shelter Site Thirty Years after the Accident Radioactive Releases after the Chernobyl Accident Chernobyl NPP site,5 % of the spent
More informationHEALTH PHYSICS SOCIETY
HEALTH PHYSICS SOCIETY Specialists in Radiation Safety Background Information on Guidance for Protective Actions Following a Radiological Terrorist Event Position Statement of the Health Physics Society*
More information-Update - Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Government of Japan
Japan s Nuclear Emergency -Update - April 6, 2011 Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Government of Japan Table of Contents A. Japan Faces an Unprecedented Challenge (Enormous Earthquake, Tsunamis
More informationFukushima Daiichi Status Report
Fukushima Daiichi Status Report 24 November 2011 The IAEA issues regular status reports to the public on the current status of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, including information on environmental
More informationPreliminary Study of the Emergency Planning Zone Evaluation for the Nuclear Power Plant in Taiwan by Using MACCS2 Code
Preliminary Study of the Emergency Planning Zone Evaluation for the Nuclear Power Plant in Taiwan by Using MACCS2 Code Chung-Kung Lo, Ing-Jane Chen, Yu-Hao Huang and Yuan-Ching Chou Institute of Nuclear
More informationResponse to Nuclear Emergency Situation - Viewpoints of Crisis Management -
3 rd meeting, material 6 Response to Nuclear Emergency Situation - Viewpoints of Crisis Management - February 2015 Nuclear Regulation Authority Material 3 Response to nuclear disasters Act on Special Measures
More informationHaruyasu NAGAI, Masamichi CHINO, Hiroaki TERADA, Genki KATATA, Hiromasa NAKAYAMA, and Masakazu OTA Japan Atomic Energy Agency
System for Prediction of Environmental Emergency Dose Information Multi-model Package 1/16 International Workshop, Feb. 22-23, 2012 Source term estimation and atmospheric dispersion simulations of radioactive
More informationRadiation monitoring of contaminated foodstuffs in Poland after the Chernobyl accident
Radiation monitoring of contaminated foodstuffs in Poland after the Chernobyl accident Dawid Frencel Maciej Krawczyk Emergancy Preparedness and Response Division Radiation Emergency Centre (CEZAR) National
More informationEnvironmental Radiological Monitoring for Nuclear Power Reactors (Nuclear Facility)
Environmental Radiological Monitoring for Nuclear Power Reactors (Nuclear Facility) Dr. Faraj Ghanbari RMCC Project Leader Distinguished Member of Technical Staff Sixth Annual Radiation Measurements Cross
More informationFukushima Daiichi Disaster. Facts and lessons learned. July Takashi Shoji Programme Director of WANO
Fukushima Daiichi Disaster Facts and lessons learned July 13 2011 Takashi Shoji Programme Director of WANO 7/12/2011 1 Earthquake occurrence and automatic shut-down of nuclear reactors The Tohoku Pacific
More informationCurrent Situation of Ports and Shipping in Japan after the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident
Current Situation of Ports and Shipping in Japan after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident 25th April, 2011 Maritime Bureau/Ports and Harbors Bureau Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport
More informationRadiation Contamination after the Chernobyl Nuclear Accident and the Effective Dose Received by the Population of Croatia
J. Environ. Radioactivity, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 137 146, 1998 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved Printed in Great Britain PII: S0265-931X(97)00006-X 0265-931X/98 $19.00#0.00 Radiation Contamination
More informationBasic Radiological Definitions 3 29/06/2011 EBC - Fukushima Nuclear Accident and Industrial Impact Basic Radiation Protection Definitions Dose-Equival
Fukushima Nuclear Accident and Industrial Impact Experiences and Expectations from the European and Japanese Industry Perspectives 2011 June 29th European Business Council in Japan Dr. Jens-Uwe Schmollack,
More information4. Current Status (1) Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station
4. Current Status (1) Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station 0 Plant Parameters (Fukushima Daiichi) as of October 12, 2012 at 5:00 RPV Water Injection [m 3 /h] FW Unit 1 2.9 Unit 2 2.1 Unit 3 2.1 CS 2.0
More informationOVER VIEW OF ACCIDENT OF FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NPSs AND FUTURE PLANNING TOWARD D&D
OVER VIEW OF ACCIDENT OF FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NPSs AND FUTURE PLANNING TOWARD D&D 16 NOVEMBER, 2011 Hiroshi RINDO JAPAN ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY Table of Contents 1. What s happened at Fukushima Dai-Ichi NPSs
More informationThe 2011 Tohoku Pacific Earthquake and Current Status of Nuclear Power Stations
The 2011 Tohoku Pacific Earthquake and Current Status of Nuclear Power Stations March 31, 2011 Tokyo Electric Power Company Tohoku Pacific Ocean Earthquake Time: 2:46 pm on Fri, March 11, 2011. Place:
More informationProtective Action Guidance for Radiological Incidents. Internal Review Draft August Please Do Not Distribute
Protective Action Guidance for Radiological Incidents Internal Review Draft August 07 Please Do Not Distribute Waiver This guidance is not intended to impact site cleanups occurring under other statutory
More informationNRC Research in Emergency Preparedness National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference April 11, 2017
NRC Research in Emergency Preparedness National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference April 11, 2017 Todd Smith, PhD Nuclear Regulatory Commission Jonathan Barr Nuclear Regulatory Commission Doug
More informationRegional Workshop on Observing a Nuclear Emergency Response Exercise of a Local Government 7-10 October, 2013 Hokkaido, Japan
Regional Workshop on Observing a Nuclear Emergency Response Exercise of a Local Government 7-10 October, 2013 Hokkaido, Japan First Responses to TEPCO s Fukushima Daiichi NPP Accident ---by JAEA October
More informationContents of summary. 1. Introduction
Contents of summary 1. Introduction 2. Situation regarding Nuclear Safety Regulations and Other Regulatory Frameworks in Japan before the Accident 3. Disaster Damage in Japan from the Tohoku District -
More informationThe Follow-up IAEA International Mission on Remediation of Large Contaminated Areas Off-Site the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant
NE/NEFW/2013 ORIGINAL: English 23.01.2014 Final Report The Follow-up IAEA International Mission on Remediation of Large Contaminated Areas Off-Site the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Tokyo and Fukushima
More informationThe Follow-up IAEA International Mission on remediation of large contaminated areas off-site the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant
NE/NEFW/2013 ORIGINAL: English Preliminary Summary Report The Follow-up IAEA International Mission on remediation of large contaminated areas off-site the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Tokyo and
More informationJapan s Activities for Environmental Remediation after Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident
Japan s Activities for Environmental Remediation after Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident Radioisotope Association Kenkich ISHIGURE 1. Situation at Fukushima Daiichi NPP 2. Environmental Remediation
More informationIntroduction to the Accident at Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station
Introduction to the Accident at Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station Richard Wakeford Professor in Epidemiology, Institute of Population Health and Dalton Nuclear Institute, The University of Manchester,
More informationSUMMARY OF THE MAIN OUTCOMES OF MEETINGS WITH THE JAPANESE RESEARCH COMMUNITY
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation ELECTRONIC ATTACHMENT SUMMARY OF THE MAIN OUTCOMES OF MEETINGS WITH THE JAPANESE RESEARCH COMMUNITY Developments since the 2013 UNSCEAR
More informationFUKUSHIMA DAIICHI NPP EVENT AND ASSOCIATED RADIOACTIVE SOURCE TERM CNSC S INITIAL RESPONSE
2011 WNU SUMMER INSTITUTE AUGUST 10 - CHRIST CHURH, OXFORD, UK FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI NPP EVENT AND ASSOCIATED RADIOACTIVE SOURCE TERM CNSC S INITIAL RESPONSE Prepared by: CNSC Staff Presented by: Dr. Ali El-Jaby
More informationTitle. CitationJapanese Journal of Veterinary Research, 64(1): Issue Date DOI. Doc URL. Type. File Information /jjvr.64.1.
Title Local variation of soil contamination with radioacti Sato, Itaru; Natsuhori, Masahiro; Sasaki, Jun; Satoh Author(s) Okada, Keiji CitationJapanese Journal of Veterinary Research, 64(1): 95-9 Issue
More informationPress briefing at the Prime Minister s Office for members of the foreign press
Press briefing at the Prime Minister s Office for members of the foreign press 20 April 2011 Mr. Noriyuki Shikata, Deputy Cabinet Secretary for Public Relations: Good evening, we are starting this evening
More informationNAS Beebe Symposium: The Science and Response to a Nuclear Reactor Accident
NAS Beebe Symposium: The Science and Response to a Nuclear Reactor Accident Post Emergency Transition to Recovery William Irwin, Sc.D., CHP History As Our Guide Findings from Chernobyl demonstrate the
More informationOverview of Environmental Impact Assessment in Korea
Overview of Environmental Impact Assessment in Korea jymoon@kins.re.kr Jong Yi MOON Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety Table of Content 1. Current Status of NPP in Korea 2. Overview of EIA System in Korea
More informationInternational environmental radioactivity information exchange: the Chernobyl experience. Marc De Cort
International environmental radioactivity information exchange: the Chernobyl experience Marc De Cort 1 April May 26 28 30 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 Release 1. Detection in Sweden in the
More informationSummary SUMMARY. Contents of Summary
SUMMARY Contents of Summary 1. Introduction 2. Further Developments regarding the Nuclear Accident 3. Efforts to Settle the Accident 4. Responses to people suffering as a result of the nuclear accident
More informationAn overview of what happened at Fukushima NPPs
An overview of what happened at Fukushima NPPs Per F. Peterson Professor and Chair Department of Nuclear Engineering University of California, Berkeley 2011 PEER Annual Meeting Hotel Shattuck Berkeley
More informationRadiation effects from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Radiation effects from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The radiation effects from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster are the results of release of radioactive
More informationTEPCO s Nuclear Power Plants suffered from big earthquake of March 11,2011
TEPCO s Nuclear Power Plants suffered from big earthquake of March 11,2011 Follow up prepared at 4pm of March 23, revised April 13 Yoshiaki Oka Waseda university Recovery action is in progress. The presentation
More informationUNSCEAR. A 2015 white paper to guide the Scientific Committee s future programme of work
UNSCEAR United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation DEVELOPMENTS SINCE THE 2013 UNSCEAR REPORT ON THE LEVELS AND EFFECTS OF RADIATION EXPOSURE DUE TO THE NUCLEAR ACCIDENT FOLLOWING
More informationImportant. Stories on. Decommissioning. Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, now and in the future
Important Stories on Decommissioning Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, now and in the future Introduction The process of decommissioning TEPCO's Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station is currently
More informationImmediate Countermeasures
September 3, 2013 Agency for Natural Resources and Energy, METI of Japan 2 nd Fact sheet: Overview of Contaminated Water Issue at TEPCO s Fukushima Daiichi NPS On June 19, 2013, TEPCO announced that ground
More informationDevelopment of technologies for the processing and disposal of radioactive waste
Development of technologies for the processing and disposal of radioactive waste International Experts' Symposium on the Decommissioning of TEPCO's Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1-41 March
More informationA Call for Public Safety:
OWEN SOUND BARRIE PETERBOROUGH KINGSTON TORONTO MISSISSAUGA HAMILTON ROCHESTER SYRACUSE BUFFALO DETROIT WINDSOR A Call for Public Safety: Addressing Nuclear Risks on the Great Lakes CLEVELAND Nuclear Power
More informationModelling NORM in the environment
Modelling NORM in the environment EMRAS Project, NORM Working Group R.S. O Brien O Australia; P. McDonald UK; P.W. Waggitt IAEA; V. Koukouliou Greece; D. PérezP Sánchez Spain; J. Horyna - Czech Republic;
More informationRADIATION AND REGULATION IN A POST- FUKUSHIMA WORLD. Allison Macfarlane NCRP Annual Dinner Bethesda, MD March 15, 2015
RADIATION AND REGULATION IN A POST- FUKUSHIMA WORLD Allison Macfarlane NCRP Annual Dinner Bethesda, MD March 15, 2015 REMAINING CHALLENGES TO THE GLOBAL NUCLEAR SAFETY REGIME Accidents can affect large
More informationSummary of Laws and Regulations for Nuclear Emergency Preparedness
Summary of Laws and Regulations for Nuclear Emergency Preparedness [Reactor Regulation Act] Prevention of disasters by regulations for operation, etc. of reactors and securing of public safety Order of
More informationEngaging with local stakeholders: some lessons from Fukushima for recovery
Engaging with local stakeholders: some lessons from Fukushima for recovery R.S. Hayano Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; e-mail: hayano@phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
More informationMeasures against Beef which Exceeds the Provisional Regulation Values of Radioactive Cesium by the Government to Restore Safety of Beef
Measures against Beef which Exceeds the Provisional Regulation Values of Radioactive Cesium by the Government to Restore Safety of Beef July 22, 2011 Government of Japan Contents 1. Executive Summary 2.
More informationAdvanced Technologies for Fuel Debris Retrieval towards Fukushima Daiichi Decommissioning
Advanced Technologies for Fuel Debris Retrieval towards Fukushima Daiichi Decommissioning Eiichiro WATANABE Waste Technology Section Division of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology Department of Nuclear
More informationThe Nuclear Crisis in Japan
The Nuclear Crisis in Japan March 21, 2011 Daniel Okimoto Alan Hanson Kate Marvel The Fukushima Daiichi Incident 1. Plant Design 2. Accident Progression 3. Radiological releases 4. Spent fuel pools " Fukushima
More informationGovernment Actions to Ensure the Safety of Beef and Other Food
Government Actions to Ensure the Safety of Beef and Other Food August 29, 2011 The Government of Japan Table of Contents I. The Detection of Radioactive cesium which exceeds the provisional regulation
More informationThe Fukushima Daiichi Incident Dr. Matthias Braun - 19 May p.1
Dr. Matthias Braun - 19 May 2011 - p.1 The Fukushima Daiichi Incident 1. Plant Design 2. Accident Progression 3. Radiological releases 4. Spent fuel pools 5. Sources of Information Matthias Braun PEPA4-G,
More informationOverview about NERIS-TP and PREPARE
European Technology Platform on Preparedness for Nuclear and Radiological Emergency Response and Recovery Overview about NERIS-TP and PREPARE Bordeaux, 13.09.2013, 1 Introduction l l NERIS-TP: Towards
More informationMajor events leading to the accident on April 26, 1986
LIFE AFTER CHERNOBYL CHERNOBYL 26 of April,1986 Major events leading to the accident on April 26, 1986 The movement of the rods associated with emergency protection and manual control, initiated by the
More informationInventory estimation of 137 Cs in radioactive wastes generated from contaminated water treatment system in Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station
E-Journal of Advanced Maintenance Vol.7-2 (2015) 138-144 Japan Society of Maintenology Inventory estimation of 137 Cs in radioactive wastes generated from contaminated water treatment system in Fukushima
More informationXII. Lessons Learned From the Accident Thus Far
XII. Lessons Learned From the Accident Thus Far The Fukushima NPS accident has the following aspects: it was triggered by a natural disaster; it led to a severe accident with damage to nuclear fuel, Reactor
More informationDose and Risk Assessment Dr. Charley Yu Dr. David LePoire Argonne National Laboratory
Dose and Risk Assessment Dr. Charley Yu Dr. David LePoire Argonne National Laboratory Dose and Risk Assessment Introduction to dose and risk assessment and radionuclide transport in the environment Overview
More informationStatus of Radioactive Waste Management in Japan
Status of Radioactive Waste Management in Japan Regional Meeting on the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management Gyeongju, 5-8 November,
More informationCotter Corporation (N.S.L.) ( Cotter )
COMPARISON OF BOUNDARY GAMMA EXPOSURE RATES AND AIR CONCENTRATIONS TO MODELED VALUES AND EXAMINATION OF HISTORIC ESTIMATES OF DOSE TO THE PUBLIC Prepared for: Cotter Corporation (N.S.L.) ( Cotter ) 7800
More informationDose and Risk Calculations for Decontamination of a Hot Cell
Dose and Risk Calculations for Decontamination of a Hot Cell Amr Abdelhady and T. Mongy Reactors dept., Nuclear Research Center, Atomic Energy Authority, Cairo, Egypt Received: 1 /2/ 2014 Accepted: 6 /3/
More informationThe GRS Emergency Centre during the Fukushima NPS Accident: Communicating Radiological Information to the Public
The GRS Emergency Centre during the Fukushima NPS Accident: Communicating Radiological Information to the Public F.-N. Sentuc, S. Dokter Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) mbh Schwertnergasse
More informationComparison of the Chernobyl and Fukushima Nuclear Power Plants Accidents and their Consequences
International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iemss) 2012 International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software Managing Resources of a Limited Planet, Sixth Biennial Meeting, Leipzig,
More informationFAO/IAEA NARO Technical Workshop Remediation of Radioactive Contamination in Agriculture
Development, Testing and Harmonization of Models and Data for Radiological Impact Assessments (MODARIA II) 2 November 2016 FAO/IAEA NARO Technical Workshop Remediation of Radioactive Contamination in Agriculture
More informationNaturally-occurring Carbon-14 and Implications to Power Plant Dose Assessment
Naturally-occurring Carbon-14 and Implications to Power Plant Dose Assessment Ken Sejkora Entergy Nuclear Northeast Pilgrim Station Presented at the 20 th Annual RETS-REMP Workshop San Jose, CA / 28-30
More informationCooperation between the IAEA and Fukushima Prefecture. Interim Report ( )
Cooperation between the IAEA and Fukushima Prefecture In the Area of Radiation Monitoring, Remediation and Waste Management following the Accident at TEPCO s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Interim
More informationFukushima-Daiichi - a radiochemical view of the evolving situation in Summer 2011.
Fukushima-Daiichi - a radiochemical view of the evolving situation in Summer 2011. Kath Morris. Research Centre for Radwaste and Decommissioning The University of Manchester With thanks to Dr Edward Blandford,
More informationGIS supports the restoration of the nuclear disaster in Fukushima
GIS supports the restoration of the nuclear disaster in Fukushima Hiroaki Terasawa, Yoshinori Matsunaga, Takashi Shimizu, Katsuhiko Gomi Asia Air Survey Co., Ltd. Outline: 1. The nuclear disaster in Fukushima.
More informationJapan s Energy White Paper 2017
Japan s Energy White Paper 207 Japan s Energy Landscape and Key Policy Measures PART Fukushima Reconstruction Progress PART 2 New Developments in Energy Policy PART 3 Energy System Reform and Bolstering
More informationENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION ACTIVITIES IN JAPAN FOLLOWING THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI REACTOR INCIDENT
ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION ACTIVITIES IN JAPAN FOLLOWING THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI REACTOR INCIDENT - 12603 ABSTRACT J. W. Lively,* J. L. Kelley,* M. R. Marcial,* Shoko Yashio, Nobou Kuriu, Hiroaki Kamijo,
More informationFRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM APPLICATION OF ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
ATTACHMENT F-3: FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM APPLICATION OF ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY 1 United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation ATTACHMENT F-3 FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM APPLICATION OF ASSESSMENT
More informationAccident 1 ~1X. Appendix 4A Effect of Source Term and Plume-Related Parameters on Consequences. Introduction
Appendix 4A Effect of Source Term and Plume-Related Parameters on Consequences Introduction Appendix 4 documents the staff's evaluation of the offsite consequences of a spent fuel pool accident involving
More informationMEXT Nuclear Energy R&D
Tokyo, 1 th November 2011 MEXT Nuclear Energy R&D Masaaki NISHIJO Director, Office for Nuclear Fuel Cycles, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) 1 Future Nuclear Energy
More informationEnsuring Spent Fuel Pool Safety
Ensuring Spent Fuel Pool Safety Michael Weber Deputy Executive Director for Operations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission American Nuclear Society Meeting June 28, 2011 1 Insights from Fukushima Nuclear
More informationStudy on Severe Accident Progression and Source Terms in Fukushima Dai-ichi NPPs
Study on Severe Accident Progression and Source Terms in Fukushima Dai-ichi NPPs October 27, 2014 H. Hoshi, R. Kojo, A. Hotta, M. Hirano Regulatory Standard and Research Department, Secretariat of Nuclear
More informationProbabilistic Versus Deterministic Analysis for Demonstration of Compliance with the Dose Criteria in 10 CFR Part 20, Subpart E
Probabilistic Versus Deterministic Analysis for Demonstration of Compliance with the Dose Criteria in 10 CFR Part 20, Subpart E R. (Boby) Abu-Eid U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ABSTRACT The U.S. Nuclear
More informationThe TAWARA_RTM project
The TAWARA_RTM project Water Safety and Security Workshop, Brussels - December 12 th 2016 The TAWARA_RTM project A. Iovene on behalf of the TAWARA_RTM Consortium 1 Water Safety and Security Workshop, Brussels
More informationRADIOACTIVITY MONITORING IN FOOD AND FEED CURRENT STATUS IN THE EU COUNTRIES
RADIOACTIVITY MONITORING IN FOOD AND FEED CURRENT STATUS IN THE EU COUNTRIES Katarzyna Sobiech-Matura Borbala Mate Timotheos Altzitzoglou Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (EC-JRC-IRMM)
More informationRe: Interim policy on reuse, etc. of construction by-products generated by public construction works in Fukushima Prefecture
Industrial Health Division Notification No. 1119-1 19 November 2013 To: Director of Labour Standards Department, Fukushima Prefectural Labour Bureau Director of Industrial Health Division Industrial Safety
More informationCleanup Associated with Fukushima Incident Radiological Survey & Soil Sorting for Waste Minimization
Cleanup Associated with Fukushima Incident Radiological Survey & Soil Sorting for Waste Minimization Steve Rima, CHP, CSP Vice President, AMEC Environment & Infrastructure 2 Cesium Surface Deposition Map
More informationTHE DEVELOPMENT OF NORDIC GUIDANCE IN LEVEL 3 PSA. Lloyd s Register: P.O. Box 1288, Sundbyberg, Sweden, SE-17225, and
THE DEVELOPMENT OF NORDIC GUIDANCE IN LEVEL 3 PSA Anders Olsson 1, Andrew Caldwell 1, Gunnar Johanson 2, Jan-Erik Holmberg 3, Ilkka Karanta 4, Karin Fritof 5 1 Lloyd s Register: P.O. Box 1288, Sundbyberg,
More informationFukushima and Emergency Planning Coversheet
Coversheet Herschel Specter December, 2013 , Executive Summary Executive Summary One of the major lessons to be learned from the Fukushima accident is the need to minimize overall public risks from nuclear
More informationSafety Implication for Gen-IV SFR based on the Lesson Learned from the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPPs Accident. Ryodai NAKAI Japan Atomic Energy Agency
Safety Implication for Gen-IV SFR based on the Lesson Learned from the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPPs Accident Ryodai NAKAI Japan Atomic Energy Agency Contents Introduction Japanese Government Report to the IAEA
More informationManagement and Evaluation of the Forest Fire Situation in the Exclusion Zone and Zone of Unconditional (Mandatory) Resettlement
Management and Evaluation of the Forest Fire Situation in the Exclusion Zone and Zone of Unconditional (Mandatory) Resettlement Chadwick Dearing Oliver Global Institute of Sustainable Forestry, Yale University,
More informationReflecting on the three years after 3/11
Reflecting on the three years after 3/11 Wim C. Turkenburg Copernicus Institute - Utrecht University - The Netherlands w.c.turkenburg@uu.nl Symposium Hope Step Japan, Amsterdam 8 March 2014 Copernicus
More informationCONSEQUENCES OF THE ACCIDENT AT THE CHERNOBYL NPP
CONSEQUENCES OF THE ACCIDENT AT THE CHERNOBYL NPP VOLODYMYR BERKOVSKYY RADIATION PROTECTION INSTITUTE, KIEV, UKRAINE AND MIKHAIL BALONOV INSTITUTE OF RADIATION HYGIENE, ST. PETERSBURG, RUSSIA RPI O E C
More informationJAPAN EARTHQUAKE/TSUNAMI UPDATE
Thursday 28 April 2011 REPORT # SOR-036-11 JAPAN EARTHQUAKE/TSUNAMI UPDATE Updated reporting on corrective measures being taken by TEPCO still top the headlines as TEPCO releases its latest data concerning
More informationREMINDER OF THE GENERAL LEVEL OF CONTAMINATION IN THE TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT IN JAPAN FOLLOWING THE FUKUSHIMA ACCIDENT
Summary of information available in Japan concerning the contamination of foodstuffs by the radionuclides persisting in the environment after the Fukushima accident 13 July More than a year after the Fukushima
More informationNRA s Regulatory Perspectives on Decommissioning of TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station
NRA s Regulatory Perspectives on Decommissioning of TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station September 18, 2017 Yutaka HARA Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA), Japan 1 Contents Approach in NRA s Regulation
More information