Optimising outputs: integrating a slow pyrolysis unit into IFBB. John Corton

Transcription

1 Optimising outputs: integrating a slow pyrolysis unit into IFBB. John Corton

2 Contents 1. Background 2. The UK DECC innovation competition 3. The feed-stocks available 4. The process development 5. Integrating biochar into IFBB 6. Press fluid pre-treatment: concentrating the volatile solids fraction 7. System overview 8. Present state of the project

3 Previous PROGRASS research at IBERS Demonstrating on farm energy conversion, producing biogas and a solid fuel. Manufacturing bio-oil and char through fast pyrolysis with our partners at Aston University dept. of chemical engineering (UK). Manufacturing bio-oil and hydrochar through hydrothermal liquefaction and carbonisation with our partners at The University of Leeds (UK).

4 The UK Governments Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) Innovation Competition At the start of 2013 a DECC innovation competition was announced for UK academic institutions and industrialists. DECC wanted innovative ways to use the biomass generated from wetland management in order to generate bioenergy. They wanted commercial input to kick start an industry.

5 DECC Project Objectives for IBERS/AMW 1. Attempt to further optimise the PROGRASS system exploiting the knowledge gained during PROGRASS 1 (including the thermochemical research). 2. Produce a working farm scale plant with a modular design. 3. Use off the shelf available technologies. 4. Be flexible to different feed-stocks. 5. Produce high calorific value briquettes.

6 AMW Arboreal Ltd are contractors that deal with a diverse range of landscapes. This provided us with a variety of feed-stocks. Rush (Juncus) from wetlands.

7 Reed Harvesting

8 AMW Arboreal were also involved in tree felling and woodland management and so wood chip was available.

9 Process description An evolved process using the PROGRASS research effort as a platform. Unite biological (AD) and Thermochemical conversions into one system.

10 The thermochemical component: the use of Biochar to optimise combustion fuel performance Pyrolysis rig and drying module Reed char Use dry feed stock and exploit the excess thermal energy to dry other feed-stocks. The char is mixed into the briquettes.

11 Mixed Briquettes Briquette Composition Rush press cake 65 Woodchip 25 Reed char 10

12 The biological component: the use of volatile solids concentration to optimise methane production per unit time.

13 Press fluid concentration trials

14 Why omit the water pre-treatment step for this processing plant? 1. Reactor size. 2. Energy cost. 3. Obtain a concentrated digestate fertilizer. 4. The spillage potential near to sensitive water courses. Quandary: how do we balance the benefits of optimal demineralisation against these factors??

15 PROGRASS Platform Biomass Hydrothermal Conditioning Provides: A strong basis for the work, founded on published experimental pilot scale European research. Mechanical Separation Press Fluid Press Cake Fermentation Drying Biogas Dehydrated Biomass Combined Heat and Power Plant Thermal Energy Pelleting Fertiliser Electric Energy Solid fuel

16 Processing overview

17 Processing on farm/reserve

18 A different system for a different situation By concentrating the press fluid we increased biogas derived energy yield by approx. 70% per unit time. By adding char into the briquette we increased the calorific value. Negative GHG balance are estimated at kgco2e ha -1 (not including press fluid concentration figures). Wrong to compare it directly to the PROGRASS vs 1 as the feed-stocks and equipment are different. It is an example of how the system can be adapted and applied to distinct situations using creative processing solutions.

19 Where are we now? The project finishes in April AMW are finalising the construction of the drying stages of the process using an AgBag system. Emissions testing is yet to be conducted. Char rig is undergoing final engineering work. LCA needs updating with new methane production results and new drying facility. Still under analysis.

20 Acknowledgements Professor Iain Donnison Professor Michael Wachendorf Dr. Mariecia Fraser Sally Mills (RSPB) Jonathan Walker (AMW) Funded by the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change wetland biomass to bioenergy innovation competition.