Using Process Optimization and Energy Audits to Reduce Energy Costs
|
|
- Jayson Russell
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Using Process Optimization and Energy Audits to Reduce Energy Costs PNCWA Annual Conference 23 October 2012 Ron Moeller Operations Services Leader
2 Presentation Outline What is a process energy-audit? Energy use in WWTPs Process interrelationships What questions to ask yourself Potential obstacles Case Studies
3 What Is a Process Energy Audit? Different from an Energy Audit Looks primarily at O&M Savings found in process adjustments Process understanding is key Understand interrelationships
4 Collaborative Workshops Auditor/facilitator with WWTP experience Engage management, operations, maintenance, and engineering staff Create understanding and buy-in
5 Power use Million kwh/year 30 ft TDH Preliminary Treatment Primary Settling 60 ft TDH Trickling Filter - Rock Trickling Filter - Plastic RBC Activated Sludge Coarse Bubble Activated Sludge Fine Bubble Gravity Thickening DAF Thickening Anaerobic Digestion Vacuum Filters Centrifuge Belt Filters Aerobic Digestion WWTP Energy Use Typical Energy Use Profile for 10 mgd Secondary Treatment Processes. Source: WEF 2009, Figure 7.1
6 Energy Costs 1 HP running 24/7/365 costs the following: Utility Cost per kwh Annual Cost Tacoma, WA $0.042 $ Western WA $0.065 $ California $0.17 $1, Hawaii $0.33 $2,155.36
7 Savings Opportunities Headworks/Influent Pumping Primary Clarification Secondary Treatment Filtration (media and membrane) Disinfection Solids Handling
8 Be Careful Everything is Related! Headworks Primary Clarifier Aeration Basin Secondary Clarifier Filter Disinfection Inf. Pump Thickener Digestion Dewatering A change in one area may have unintended consequences in other areas!
9 Ask Yourself Have we tried to modify process operation to gain energy savings? When was the last time we asked why are we doing it this way? Have we adopted SOPs or does each shift change operation based on their preference? Do we collect data and understand how our process behaves? Can we turn this off? Can we improve power quality?
10 Obstacles to Energy Efficiency Resistance to change Perception that saving energy = reduced effluent quality Skepticism with new technology Already optimized Cost to implement I m too busy
11 EPA Evaluation of ECMs does not discuss process-related ECMs
12 1 Source: EPA 832-R Example ECMs
13 Case Study #1 City of Greeley, Colorado Average flow 7.4 mgd Selector activated sludge Ammonia limits Anoxic selector for alkalinity gain MLR pump constant 1Q Average DO 2.4 mg/l F/M of 0.23 MCRT of days Operate 3 of 4 clarifiers RAS rates near 100% Avg. electric cost $0.066 kwh
14 Case Study #1
15 Case Study #1 Project Methodology 1. Information Collection Data review, request for additional information, and synthesis of this information followed. 2. Site Visit The site visit and facility tour were conducted with workshop participants. 3. Workshop The workshop focused on energy utilization and wastewater process control, and allowed an exchange of information that increased the number and applicability of recommendations. 4. Technical Memo Provided a summary of findings and recommendations
16 CS#1: Primaries Condition Septic primary clarifiers identified Liquid stream ph drops from 7.6 to 6.5 5% cbod removal and increased ammonia Huge impact on AB DO requirement Primary sludge ph 5 Condition for greater than 10 years Actions and Expected Results Increase primary pumping Improve cbod removal and reduce ammonia Lower cbod air demand 25-35%
17 CS#1: Re-Aeration Condition 1,000,000 gallon tank aerating already well-oxidized RAS only Totally unnecessary in current set-up Increases DO to anoxic selector Actions and Expected Results Remove tank from service Reduces DO to selector Lowers overall blower requirement
18 CS#1: Anoxic Selector Condition Not effective for filament control Nitrate reduction not consistent Too much DO in MLR and Re-Aeration Inconsistent ALK gain Actions and Expected Results Lower mixed liquor DO Take Re-Aeration off line Reduced cbod to aerobic by approx.15 mg/l Improved ALK and ph Improved filament control
19 CS#1: RAS Condition RAS rate too high / VFDs manually controlled Thins WAS concentration / increases WAS costs Increases RAS pumping costs Impacts selector, aerobic, and clarifier performance Action and Expected Results Pace RAS off raw sewage meter RAS rates should be 30-60% Reduces RAS and WAS pumping costs Reduces WAS volume 25% Improves selector, aerobic, and clarifier performance
20 CS#1: DO & MLSS Condition AB DO at 2.4 mg/l MLSS at 2600 mg/l HP blowers in service Action and Expected Results Reduce AB DO to 1.5 mg/l Increase MLSS to 3200 mg/l Reduce sludge yield Reduce DO recycle to selector
21 CS#1: Filaments Condition Current SVI good but historically variable Reoccuring problem with Microthrix parvicella and Nostocoida limicola Action and Expected Results Improved selector performance from DO recycle control should reduce filaments (esp. N. Limicola) SVI control results in increased realized clarifier capacity and possible increase in RAS/WAS concentration
22 CS#1: Sludge Yield/WAS Condition Current sludge yield is 0.76 Action and Expected Results Data trending indicated that decreasing F/M from 0.24 to 0.19 produces a sludge yield of 0.6 This correlates to a 22% reduction in WAS mass Lower WAS production saves money throughout solids train
23 CS#1: Clarifiers Condition Three clarifiers on-line Three RAS pumps on-line Action and Expected Results Evaluation showed that only 2 clarifiers and 2 RAS pumps needed Reduced energy related to clarifier and RAS pump operation Less maintenance on equipment
24 CS#1: Pieces of a Puzzle
25 CS#1: Projected Results Proposed Energy Control Measures Table Equipment/Process Change Description Horse Power Volts Current Phase (1 or 3) Hours Monthly Reduction (kwh) Annual Reduction (kwh) Monthly Reduction ($) Annual Reduction ($) Percentage Reduction ($) WAS Thickening Centrifuge Blower Blower RAS Pump Secondary Clarifier Reduced runtime from increased WAS concentration. cbod and ammonia reduction, coupled with other passive DO reduction measures, allows 2nd blower to be turned off at night (9 PM to 9 AM.) Taking the 1,000,000 gallon RAS Reaeration Tank offline will reduce the need for a third blower. RAS pump associated with secondary clarifer taken offline. Remove one of three from service. State-point analysis shows one can be safely taken offline , ,792 $ $9, % , ,422 $4, $53, % ,070 1,632,845 $8, $106, % ,164 97,971 $ $6, % ,531 $35.38 $ % Monthly Totals 224,380 kwh $14, Annual Totals 2,692,561 kwh $175, %
26 CS#1: Projected Results Up to 2,697,000 kwh/year reduction in power $175,000/year, or $875,000 every 5 years! Potential 38% reduction in total plant electrical use Improved sludge quality 20-40% reduction in WAS sludge production More stable and consistent secondary operation Lower effluent nitrate Less odors Reduced O&M labor Staff has improved process control procedures/knowledge
27 Environmental Impact The reduced greenhouse gasses (measured by carbon dioxide [CO2] equivalent) that could be realized from the project are significant. The annual environmental equivalents of reducing the electricity are shown below: Equivalent to avoiding emissions of 1,937 metric tons of CO2 per year CO2 emissions from 217,873 gallons of gasoline consumed CO2 equivalent of removing 370 cars from the road per year CO2 emissions from 4,504 barrels of oil consumed CO2 emissions from electricity use of 235 homes per year CO2 emissions from 80,704 propane cylinders used for home barbecues Carbon sequestered by 49,664 tree seedlings grown for 10 years Carbon sequestered annually by 413 acres of pine or fir forests
28 Case Study #2 City of Tacoma, Washington Average flow 22.7 mgd Pure oxygen activated sludge Peak wet weather facility creates high peak demand charge for remainder of the year Primaries hydraulically taxed in the winter SVI highly variable (150 to 280 ml/g) UNOX first stage DO is 7.0 mg/l Mixed liquor channel is aerated Solids handling includes DAFT, ATAD, anaerobic digestion, and belt presses for sludge dewatering Avg. electric cost $0.042 kwh
29 Case Study #2 Project Methodology 1. Information Collection Data review, request for additional information, and synthesis of this information followed. 2. Site Visit A site visit and facility tour were conducted with senior staff. 3. Workshop The workshop focused on energy utilization, and allowed an exchange of information that increased the number and applicability of recommendations. 4. Technical Memo Provided a summary of findings and recommendations
30 CS#2: PWWF Condition PWWF runs for a few hours each year, but establishes the peak electrical demand charge for the next 11 months Five 900 HP pumps Five 10 HP fans run continuously Transformers are on year round Actions and Expected Results Turn off fans and transformers 6 to 9 months out of the year Establish SOP for consistent operation of PWWF Annual savings of $35,000
31 CS#2: Primaries Condition Hydraulically taxed in winter Reduced BOD and TSS removal Actions and Expected Results Encouraged winter operation of CEPT Increase BOD and TSS removal Reduced oxygen demand in UNOX equals savings of $17,700 Possibility of greater oxygen demand in ATAD 15% more primary sludge production increases gas production Potential energy value of $77,900
32 CS#2: UNOX Condition Well operated and in good working order No D.O. control in stages 2-4 Highly variable SVIs; good sludge yield (0.60) ATAD off gas is routed back to the UNOX first stage Actions and Expected Results Lower first stage D.O. from 7 to 6 mg/l Route ATAD off gas to other stages Install VFDs and D.O. monitoring/control on mixers in stages 2-4
33 CS#2: Mixed Liquor Channels Condition Air in the channel is provided by a 75 HP blower and appears to be over-aerated There is foaming in the channel that feeds the secondary clarifiers (damage to floc?) Actions and Expected Results Reduce air to the channel (lower the blower VFD speed, use a smaller blower, etc.) One-third reduction results in annual savings of $7,000 Potential to reduce/eliminate foaming and floc shear
34 CS#2: DAFT Condition No control of recycle water pump Actions and Expected Results Install VFDs on recycle water pump A 50% turndown results in annual savings of $18,000 Under CEPT, shut down one DAFT in winter, resulting in annual savings of $14,000
35 CS#2: Projected Results Equipment/Process Change Description HP Saved Hours Annual Savings Influent Wet Well Run with higher wet well level to increase pump suction head $7,021 Headworks Odor Scrubber Shut off in winter. 6 months/year is equivalent to shutting off 12 hours/day $3,511 Grit Odor Scrubber Shut off in winter. 6 months/year is equivalent to shutting off 12 hours/day $2,106 Grit Tank Air Reduce air to tanks. Change pulley or install VFDs. Assume 20% reduction $1,404 Peak Wet Weather Fans. There are 5 ea. 10HP fans that could be turned off for 9 months/year, equivalent to shutting off 18 hours/day $10,532 Transformers. There are 5 ea. 900KVA transformers that could Peak Wet Weather be turned off for 9 months/year, equivalent to shutting off 18 hours/day. $25,040 Winter operation of chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT). 15% reduction of BOD to UNOX system equates to Primary Clarifiers lower O 2 production. Assume 40% net reduction of oxygen related to the additional BOD removal in the primary clarifiers. $44,382 x 40% = $17,747. $17,747 Install VFDs and monitoring equipment for DO control on 2nd, UNOX 3rd, and 4th stage mixers. Assume 10% reduction on one train in service year-round = 25HP $7,021 Install VFDs and monitoring equipment for DO control on 2nd, UNOX 3rd, and 4th stage mixers. Assume 10% reduction on a second train in service during higher winter flows = 25HP running only 6 months/year = 12.5HP $3,511 UNOX Repair air leakage on tanks. HP equivalent is an estimate $5,617 Secondary Clarifiers Reduce air in the MLSS channel to the clarifiers. Assume 1/3 runtime $7,021 DAFT Install VFDs. Allow 50% turndown. Assume 80% reduction of current 80% efficiency = 64HP savings $17,974 DAFT (under CEPT) Turn off one recycle pump during winter. 6 months/year is equivalent to shutting off 12 hours/day $14,042 #6 Digester Turn off gas mixing compressor or operate in ON/OFF mode. Assume 50% reduction in runtime $3,511 Blend Tank Mixer pump is oversized. Reduce runtime $7,489 Total $133,547
36 CS#2: Projected Results Up to 2,697,000 kwh/year reduction in power $133,500/year, or $667,500 every 5 years --- Hey, this is at $0.042 kwh too!! Potential 14% reduction in total plant electrical use Improved UNOX process control Improved primary clarifier performance More stable and consistent secondary operation Reduced O&M labor Staff has improved process control procedures/knowledge
37 Recommendations Savings from some recommendations are not enumerated (labor, reduced maintenance, chemical, etc.) No capital costs process changes only! The recommendations presented are viable. However, Utilities may choose not to implement the recommendations for the following reasons: Political (Odors) Socio-Economic (TAGRO) Regulatory (Energy, Rerate)
38 Obstacles to Energy Efficiency Resistance to change Perception that saving energy = reduced effluent quality Skepticism with new technology Already optimized Cost to implement I m too busy
39 Summary Many savings opportunities can be identified using a process energy audit. Operator involvement is paramount! Look for opportunities in design as well. Energy Performance Contracting (EPC) is a possible contracting vehicle that reduces financial risk. There are resources out there to help you get started!
40 Questions and Answers
Presentation Outline
Presentation Outline Nitrification/denitrification refresher Treatment technologies available for nitrification and BNR/ENR What is the problem? BNR/ENR VPDES permitting Causes of reduced BNR performance
More informationDitches for Energy Efficiency and Improved Nitrogen Removal
Upgrade of the Big Gulch WWTP Oxidation Ditches for Energy Efficiency and Improved Nitrogen Removal Thomas G. Authors: Thomas E. Coleman, dtec Systems Bridges, Mukilteo Water & Wastewater District Bend,
More information2015 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.
2015 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. Hastings Utilities Water Pollution Control Facility Improvements Brian Bakke, HDR ASCE Environmental Conference 4/6/2017 Review Existing Facilities Need for the Project
More informationAmerican Water College 2010
Vocabulary Activated Sludge (Part 1) Activated Sludge Sludge particles produced in raw or settled wastewater (primary effluent) by the growth of organisms (including zoogleal bacteria) in aeration tanks
More informationBIOLOGICAL WASTEWATER BASICS
BIOLOGICAL WASTEWATER BASICS PRESENTATION GOALS EXPLAIN DIFFERENT TYPES OF WASTEWATER EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENT BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS AND HOW THEY FUNCTION. COMPARE AND CONTRAST AEROBIC AND ANAEROBIC SYSTEMS
More informationAltoona Westerly Wastewater Treatment Facility BNR Conversion with Wet Weather Accommodation
Pennsylvania Water Environment Federation PennTEC Annual Technical Conference June 4, 2013 Altoona Westerly Wastewater Treatment Facility BNR Conversion with Wet Weather Accommodation Presented by: Jim
More informationAssuming 100 gallons per capita per day, and 3 people per REU, design flows for the development are proposed to be:
Andelina Farms Wastewater Treatment Plant Preliminary Basis of Design May 2018 Andelina Farms is a proposed Planned Unit Development in Saline Township located along US-12 just west of the City of Saline.
More informationBEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary
BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND Brett T. Messner, PE, Tetra Tech, Inc., 201 E Pine St, Suite 1000, Orlando, FL 32801 Brett.Messner@tetratech.com, Ph: 239-851-1225 Fred
More informationCoupling Trickling Filter or RBC s with Activated Sludge
Coupling Trickling Filter or RBC s with Activated Sludge By John R. Harrison, P.E. Kennedy/Jenks Consultants 503-295-4911 or JohnHarrison@KennedyJenks.com 1. What are Combined or Coupled Plants? Most coupled
More informationWASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT MASTER PLAN 6. BUSINESS CASE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT MASTER PLAN 6. BUSINESS CASE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES A range of potential ammonia limits were identified for alternatives evaluation, as discussed in Section 2.2.5. This chapter
More informationA Battle to Be the Best: A Comparison of Two Powerful Sidestream Treatment Technologies: Post Aerobic Digestion and Anammox
A Battle to Be the Best: A Comparison of Two Powerful Treatment Technologies: Post Aerobic Digestion and Anammox David Oerke/CH2M Tom Johnson/CH2M Bruce Johnson/CH2M Heidi Bauer/CH2M Steve Graziano/CH2M
More informationNorth Side WRP Master Plan Research and Development Department 2006 Seminar Series October 27, 2006 Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of
North Side WRP Master Plan Research and Development Department 2006 Seminar Series October 27, 2006 Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago Today s Goals Discuss project background Provide
More informationGoals of Process Analysis. Process Operation of the Winslow WWTP. Initial Operations Analysis. Flow Data from 1/2014 to 3/2015 8/14/2015
Goals of Process Analysis Process Operation of the Winslow WWTP Randal W. Samstag Civil and Sanitary Engineer Bainbridge Island, WA Identify possible operating problems Check capacity Develop basis for
More informationGeneral Operational Considerations in Nutrient and Wet Weather Flow Management for Wastewater Treatment Facilities Part II
General Operational Considerations in Nutrient and Wet Weather Flow Management for Wastewater Treatment Facilities Part II Samuel Jeyanayagam, PhD, PE, BCEE Julian Sandino, PhD, PE, BCEE Ohio WEA Plant
More informationWASTEWATER DEPARTMENT. Bentonville Wastewater Treatment Plant Facts:
Mission: The mission of the Bentonville Wastewater Treatment Utility and staff is to protect public health and the environment through the effective treatment of wastewater. Effective wastewater treatment
More informationOperation and Control of Multiple BNR Processes in One WWTP
Operation and Control of Multiple BNR Processes in One WWTP CENTRAL PLANT Williamsport Sanitary Authority s Chesapeake Bay and CSO Compliance Program Presented by: Phil Anderson 1 June 24, 2015 Purpose
More informationOutline. Introduction Case Studies. Anoxic Zone Mixing Channel Mixing. Theory and Criteria. Mixing Theory Design Criteria.
Outline Introduction Case Studies Anoxic Zone Mixing Channel Mixing Theory and Criteria Mixing Theory Design Criteria Recommendations Where Do We Mix at WWTPs? Introduction Flow Equalization Tanks Headworks
More informationCEDAR CREEK Wastewater Treatment Facility
CEDAR CREEK Wastewater Treatment Facility Where does the waste originate Private homes Businesses from? Condominium complexes Nursing homes Apartments ANY DWELING THAT USES WATER AND IS CONNECTED TO THE
More informationPERMIT TO OPERATE SILVER CLOUD CT., MONTEREY, CA TELEPHONE (831) FAX (831)
FFR MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT PERMIT TO OPERATE 24580 SILVER CLOUD CT., MONTEREY, CA 93940 TELEPHONE (831) 647-9411 FAX (831) 647-8501 15018 OPERATION UNDER THIS PERMIT MUST BE
More informationComparison of Three Wet Weather Flow Treatment Alternatives to Increase Plant Capacity
OWEA 2013 Comparison of Three Wet Weather Flow Treatment Alternatives to Increase Plant Capacity Don Esping, Denny Parker, Jose Jimenez, Fenghua Yang, Tim Bate, Steve Arant June 19 2013 Outline Background/Goals
More informationPILOT SCALE TESTS OF A UNIQUE APPROACH FOR BNR UPGRADE OF A SHORT SRT HIGH PURITY OXYGEN SYSTEM AT PIMA COUNTY, AZ
PILOT SCALE TESTS OF A UNIQUE APPROACH FOR BNR UPGRADE OF A SHORT SRT HIGH PURITY OXYGEN SYSTEM AT PIMA COUNTY, AZ ABSTRACT Ron Riska,: Pima County Wastewater Management Division Joseph A. Husband, P.E.,
More informationWASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT MASTER PLAN 3. EXISTING FACILITIES AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT MASTER PLAN 3. EXISTING FACILITIES AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT This chapter reviews in detail the current condition of the individual components of the Napa Sanitation District
More informationConducting Successful Energy Audits for Both Water and Wastewater Utilities By: Rich Atoulikian, HDR
2014 HDR Architecture, 2016 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. Conducting Successful Energy Audits for Both Water and Wastewater Utilities By: Rich Atoulikian, HDR 2016 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.
More informationWet Weather Planning for Wastewater Treatment Plants
Wet Weather Planning for Wastewater Treatment Plants June 23, 217 Peak Flow Management: Collection vs. Treatment Collection System Peak Flow Management Single 24 hour design storm I/I reduction SSO elimination
More informationNC-PC Industry Day Pretreatment 101. Industrial Waste Impacts on POTW Treatment Processes. Dawn Padgett Operations Manager Charlotte Water
NC-PC Industry Day Pretreatment 101 Industrial Waste Impacts on POTW Treatment Processes Dawn Padgett Operations Manager Charlotte Water NC-PC Industry Day Definitions BOD Amount of oxygen consumed by
More informationCity of Andover, Kansas Energy Assessment-Wastewater Treatment Plant
City of Andover, Kansas Energy Assessment-Wastewater Treatment Plant April 7, 2014 Prepared by Jerry Blain, P.E., Project Associate Environmental Finance Center Funding for this Energy Assessment was provided
More informationWWTP Energy Audits Provide System-Wide View to Reducing Energy and Optimizing Processes
WWTP Energy Audits Provide System-Wide View to Reducing Energy and Optimizing Processes Jane Atkinson, AECOM Anthony Fiore, NYC Mayor s Office of Sustainability Rob Pape, AECOM 2016 JOINT ENERGY CONFERENCE
More informationPalmer Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Impacts. A summary of the impacts of this treatment alternative are listed below:
6.1.3 Environmental Impacts A summary of the impacts of this treatment alternative are listed below: 1. The Matanuska River will receive treated effluent as it currently does. 2. Effluent quality would
More informationPerformance Evaluation of the Moores Creek Advanced Water Resource Recovery Facility
Performance Evaluation of the Moores Creek Advanced Water Resource Recovery Facility Richard W. Gullick, Ph.D. Director of Operations Timothy Castillo Wastewater Manager Presented to the Albemarle County
More informationMatthew Cotton Process Group Manager. PNCWA October 27, 2010
Quantification of SBOD 5 and PBOD 5 Removal via Coupled Biological Contact Reactor and Ballasted High-Rate Clarification System for Wet Weather Treatment Applications Matthew Cotton Process Group Manager
More informationActivated Sludge Process Control:
2015 Pacific Water Conference Activated Sludge Process Control: What s Important and How It s Easily Implemented February 2015 Presentation takeaways 1. MCRT/SRT is the only way to control the activated
More information2015 Spring Conference
2015 Spring Conference Meeting Strict Summer Permit Requirements on Day One: Start-up of the Western Wake Regional Water Reclamation Facility Chris White, PE April 13, 2015 Acknowledgements Town of Cary
More informationSIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES
SIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES Oxidation ditches are very popular wastewater treatment processes for small to medium sized municipalities that
More informationWatertown Wastewater Facility Plan. August 11, 2015
Watertown Wastewater Facility Plan August 11, 2015 Watertown Wastewater Wastewater Treatment Facility History Comprehensive Planning Wastewater Concerns Capacity Condition Permitting Requirements Watertown
More informationEmerging Issues in the Water/Wastewater Industry. Austin s Full-Scale Step-BNR Demonstration
Summer Seminar Emerging Issues in the Water/Wastewater Industry Austin s Full-Scale Step-BNR Demonstration Rajendra P. Bhattarai, P.E., DEE Austin Water Utility, City of Austin 625 East 10 th Street, Suite
More informationAnderson Water Pollution Control Plant
City of Anderson Wastewater Division Public Works Director Jeff Kiser Chief Plant Operator Plant Supervisor Operator III Operator I Phil DeBlasio Mike Hansen Tony Hinchliff Vacant Collections Supervisor
More informationWastewater Tools: Activated Sludge and Energy Use Analysis
Wastewater Tools: Activated Sludge and Energy Use Analysis Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E. University of Memphis June 22, 2017 Objectives of Biological Treatment Oxidize dissolved and particulate biodegradable
More informationPost-Aerobic Digester with Bioaugmentation Pilot Study City of Meridian, ID WWTP PNCWA 2010
Post-Aerobic Digester with Bioaugmentation Pilot Study City of Meridian, ID WWTP by: William Leaf Adrienne Menniti Bruce Johnson CH2M HILL, Inc. Clint Dolsby Tracy Crane City of Meridian October 26, 21
More informationENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis
ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis ABSTRACT Oxidation ditches are very popular wastewater treatment
More informationTreatment Strategies and Improvements at the Blackhawk WWTP Alex Kuzovkov, P.E.
Treatment Strategies and Improvements at the Blackhawk WWTP Alex Kuzovkov, P.E. Topics Covered Background Challenges and Priorities UV and Filters High Flows Evaluation Aeration Evaluation Aeration Basins
More informationNITROGEN REMOVAL GRANT WEAVER, PE & WWTP OPERATOR PRESIDENT THE WATER PLANET COMPANY. Create Optimal Habitats
NITROGEN REMOVAL Create Optimal Habitats Recognize the Importance of People Skills Full-scale Experimentation GRANT WEAVER, PE & WWTP OPERATOR Regulatory Support Utility Support PRESIDENT THE WATER PLANET
More informationW O C H H O L Z R E G I O N A L W A T E R R E C L A M A T I O N F A C I L I T Y O V E R V I E W
Facility Overview The recently upgraded and expanded Henry N. Wochholz Regional Water Reclamation Facility (WRWRF) treats domestic wastewater generated from the Yucaipa-Calimesa service area. The WRWRF
More informationClient: City of Pontiac Project Name: Regional WWTP Feasibility Location: Pontiac, MI Project Number: Issue Date: October 23, 2006
Client: City of Pontiac Project Name: Regional WWTP Feasibility Location: Pontiac, MI Project Number: 13649553 Issue Date: October 23, 2006 Subject: WWTP Condition Assessment Auburn Plant 1. Grit Removal:
More informationWastewater Treatment. Where does wastewater go when it leaves your house?
Wastewater Treatment Where does wastewater go when it leaves your house? Let s s take a look The process includes: Collection of wastewater Primary Treatment Secondary Treatment Solids Handling Influent
More informationSolids Management for Today s Wastewater Systems
Solids Management for Today s Wastewater Systems EPA Region 4 Joseph Cantwell, PE April 26, 2012 N A T I O N A L S E C U R I T Y E N E R G Y & E N V I R O N M E N T H E A L T H C Y B E R S E C U R I T
More informationTHE DEMON ANAMMOX PROCESS: RESOURCE SAVINGS THROUGH SIDE STREAM TREATMENT, AND THE STEPS TOWARDS AN ENERGY NEUTRAL WWTP PRESENTED AT: NC AWWA-WEA 97
THE DEMON ANAMMOX PROCESS: RESOURCE SAVINGS THROUGH SIDE STREAM TREATMENT, AND THE STEPS TOWARDS AN ENERGY NEUTRAL WWTP PRESENTED AT: NC AWWA-WEA 97 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE PRESENTED ON: 13 NOVEMBER, 2017
More informationWWTF Capacity Assessment Project
Wastewater Treatment Facility Evaluation The Richland WWTF was constructed in 1985 to provide primary and secondary treatment for the City's wastewater. Section 3 includes a general description of the
More informationCity of Elk River Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvements. Achieving Wastewater Treatment Goals
City of Elk River Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvements Achieving Wastewater Treatment Goals By Tejpal Bala, P.E. Bolton & Menk, Inc. The City of Elk River received a new NPDES permit and the existing
More informationTWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Chester Yang, Ph.D., Gaowei Gu, Baowei Li, Hongyuan Li, Wanshen Lu, Lloyd Johnson,
More informationReview of WEFTEC 2016 Challenge & Overview of 2017 Event. Malcolm Fabiyi, PhD, MBA Spencer Snowling, PhD. P.Eng
Review of WEFTEC 2016 Challenge & Overview of 2017 Event Malcolm Fabiyi, PhD, MBA Spencer Snowling, PhD. P.Eng Agenda Review 2016 Challenge Provide overview of updates to 2017 event Frequency WEFTEC Scores
More informationBiological Phosphorus Removal Technology. Presented by: Eugene Laschinger, P.E.
Biological Phosphorus Removal Technology Presented by: Eugene Laschinger, P.E. Overview What is phosphorus and why do we care? How can you remove phosphorus? Biological phosphorus removal Biological phosphorus
More informationChapter 5: Treatment Assessment Future Condition
2020 Facilities Plan Treatment Report 5.1 Introduction Chapter 5: Treatment Assessment Future Condition The future performance of the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) wastewater treatment
More informationBlack River Wastewater Treatment Plant
Black River Wastewater Treatment Plant Energy Challenges Within An Aging Plant Alex Berki & Joseph Carbonaro City of Lorain, Ohio Background Built as a Primary Treatment Facility in 1955 with a design
More informationPrioritizing Energy Conservation & Minimization of Greenhouse Gas Emissions at the Arlington WWTP. Tom Giese, P.E. 26 October 2010
Prioritizing Energy Conservation & Minimization of Greenhouse Gas Emissions at the Arlington WWTP Tom Giese, P.E. 26 October 2010 Outline Project Overview Opportunities for Energy Savings Determination
More informationCITY OF FORT MYERS SOUTH ADVANCED WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
CITY OF FORT MYERS SOUTH ADVANCED WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY RAW SEWAGE Raw sewage is the water that flows into a wastewater treatment facility. It is made up of waste from toilets, sinks, garbage disposals,
More information1/11/2016. Types and Characteristics of Microorganisms. Topic VI: Biological Treatment Processes. Learning Objectives:
Topic VI: Biological Treatment Processes Learning Objectives: 1. Discuss microbiology and relate it to wastewater treatment. 2. Describe growth kinetics of pure bacterial culture with Monod expression
More informationAquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.
PHASED ACTIVATED SLUDGE SYSTEM PHASED ACTIVATED SLUDGE SYSTEM Aqua-Aerobic Systems has led the industry in time-managed, biological technology since 1984. In 2004, Aqua-Aerobic applied its expertise in
More informationTechnical Memorandum No. 1
To: From: Steve McGowan, P.E., BCEE Project Manager, Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. Eric Wang, P.E. Project Engineer, Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. Date: Subject: August 11, 28 (Final) Madison MSD Project No. 84251 Malcolm
More informationCOMPARISON OF SBR AND CONTINUOUS FLOW ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL
COMPARISON OF SBR AND CONTINUOUS FLOW ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL Alvin C. Firmin CDM Jefferson Mill, 670 North Commercial Street Suite 201 Manchester, New Hampshire 03101 ABSTRACT Sequencing
More informationNeed-to-Know Criteria Wastewater Treatment Operator Class II
2017 Need-to-Know Criteria Wastewater Treatment Operator Class II A Need-to-Know Guide when preparing for the ABC Wastewater Treatment Operator Class II Certification Exam Before You Dive In What is ABC
More informationComparison of Three Wet Weather Flow Treatment Alternatives to Increase Plant Capacity
CSWEA 2013 Comparison of Three Wet Weather Flow Treatment Alternatives to Increase Plant Capacity Don Esping, Denny Parker, Jose Jimenez, Fenghua Yang, Tim Bate, Steve Arant May 16 2013 Milwaukee MSD South
More informationChapter 2: Description of Treatment Facilities
2020 Facilities Plan Treatment Report 2.1 Introduction Chapter 2: Description of Treatment Facilities This chapter defines the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) service area. It also describes
More informationThe following biological nutrient removal processes were evaluated in detail in the 2016 Liquid Processing Facilities Plan:
Nitrite Shunt Pilot Project Purpose: The purpose of this project is to full scale pilot test the nitrite shunt biological nutrient removal process to confirm process design criteria, impacts to sludge
More informationModule 17: The Activated Sludge Process - Part III Answer Key
Module 17: The Activated Sludge Process - Part III Answer Key What other differences can you see between Complete Mix and Step Aeration? One of the features that make Complete Mix Aeration different from
More informationActivated Sludge Process Control: Nitrification
Activated Sludge Process Control: Nitrification 60 th Annual KWWOA Conference, Session 1: April 11, 2017 Dan Miklos, Senior Associate, Midwest Region, Hazen and Sawyer Agenda Overview of the Utopia Plant
More informationFull Scale Testing to Demonstrate Anaerobic Selector Effect for Low Strength Wastewater
OWEA State Conference June 20, 2012 Full Scale Testing to Demonstrate Anaerobic Selector Effect for Low Strength Wastewater Presenters Bill Donohue NEORSD Bob Hrusovsky MWH Don Esping BC Easterly Plant
More informationFremont Water Pollution Control Center Plant Expansion for Nutrient Removal and Wet Weather Flow Treatment
OWEA 2013 Annual Conference June 19, 2013 Fremont Water Pollution Control Center Plant Expansion for Nutrient Removal and Wet Weather Flow Treatment Jeff Lamson, Superintendent, WPCC Robert Hrusovsky,
More informationSecondary Treatment Process Control
SARBS One-Day Training Seminar Phoenix Club, Anaheim Secondary Treatment Process Control Graham Juby June 5, 2013 Objectives Provide an understanding of nitrogen removal process interactions to support
More informationAt the Mercy of the Process Impacts of Nitrogen Removal Performance on WWTP Disinfection
OBG PRESENTS: At the Mercy of the Process Impacts of Nitrogen Removal Performance on WWTP Disinfection Ned Talbot, PE Tri-Association Conference 2018 8/30/18 9:00-9:30AM AGENDA Overview of Plant Processes
More informationAppendix C: TM T-49 Nampa WWTP Capacity Assessment
Appendix C: TM T-49 Nampa WWTP Capacity Assessment C-1 Use of contents on this sheet is subject to the limitations specified at the end of this document. Final Facility Plan_v2_DEQReview_1.22.19.docx City
More informationThe oxidation index: a tool for controlling the activated sludge process
The oxidation index: a tool for controlling the activated sludge process A common approach to controlling the activated sludge process involves adjusting the amount of biomass in the system according to
More informationAeration University Advanced Concepts in Energy Efficiency
Aeration University Advanced Concepts in Energy Efficiency Wisconsin Wastewater Operators Association 47 th Annual Conference October 23, 2013 Presented by Phil Korth Aeration and Energy Wastewater Treatment
More informationEnhanced Nitrogen Removal Using Upflow Biological Filtration
Enhanced Nitrogen Removal Using Upflow Biological Filtration November 30, 2005 B. Stitt, G. Welch Presentation Outline Background Need for Project CT General Permit Evaluation of Alternatives Project Delivery
More informationREHABILITATION OF THE ROCKAWAY BEACH MISSOURI WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT TURNING AROUND A CHRONICALLY FAILED SYSTEM
REHABILITATION OF THE ROCKAWAY BEACH MISSOURI WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT TURNING AROUND A CHRONICALLY FAILED SYSTEM THE PROBLEMS POOR EFFLUENT QUALITY BOD 5 87 MG/L TSS 105 MG/L E.COLI - > 2420 MPN TOTAL
More informationAn Efficient Aeration Strategy Sits on a Three-Legged Stool
October 13, 2016 An Efficient Aeration Strategy Sits on a Three-Legged Stool A Case Study of Brookfield, WI by Wendy Raisbeck Outline Aeration Efficiency Stool Existing Conditions and Project Goals Aeration
More informationEfficient Design Configurations for Biological Nutrient Removal
Efficient Design Configurations for Biological Nutrient Removal A Case Study: Upper Blackstone Water Pollution Abatement District Jane E. Madden, P.E., BCEE August 30, 2017 UBWPAD Wastewater Treatment
More informationAMMONIA REMOVAL USING MLE PROCESS EXPERIENCES AT BALLARAT NORTH. David Reyne. Central Highlands Water Authority
AMMONIA REMOVAL USING MLE PROCESS EXPERIENCES AT BALLARAT NORTH Paper Presented by : David Reyne Author: David Reyne, Plant Operator Wastewater Treatment, Central Highlands Water Authority 65 th Annual
More informationSMCSD Headworks, Primary and Secondary Treatment Pre-Design
Technical Memorandum SMCSD Headworks, Primary and Secondary Treatment Pre-Design Water andenvironment Subject: Prepared For: Prepared by: Reviewed by: SMCSD Mark Takemoto, Dennis Gellerman Steve Clary
More informationManaging the Largest Extended Wet Weather Event on Record at TRA CRWS
Managing the Largest Extended Wet Weather Event on Record at TRA CRWS April 21, 2016 Julia J. Hunt Trinity River Authority of Texas David R. Jackson, P.E., BCEE Freese and Nichols, Inc. TRA CRWS Treatment
More informationGlobal Leaders in Biological Wastewater Treatment
Global Leaders in Biological Wastewater Treatment OVERVIEW OF ANOXKALDNES AnoxKaldnes is a global provider of leading-edge biological processes for wastewater treatment. The head-office is in Sweden. There
More informationWWETCO FlexFilter and Bio-FlexFilter
Innovative Filter Technology Tool for Reducing Energy, Expanding Capacity, Wet Weather Management and Nutrient Control WWETCO WWETCO FlexFilter and Bio-FlexFilter AGENDA WWETCO FlexFilter & Bio-FlexFilter
More informationUse of Biowin for Process Troubleshooting / Design for a Unique Wastewater
Use of Biowin for Process Troubleshooting / Design for a Unique Wastewater OWEA Plant Operations and Lab Analysis Workshop W. James Gellner Outline Introduction / Problem Overview Plant Issues Biowin Overview
More informationUDWQ POTW Nutrient Removal Cost Impact Study: Analysis of Tremonton City Wastewater Treatment Plant
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM UDWQ POTW Nutrient Removal Cost Impact Study: Analysis of Tremonton City Wastewater Treatment Plant PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: COPIES: Utah Division of Water Quality CH2M HILL DATE:
More informationMasses at Massillon: IFAS for Industrial Loads and Nutrient Removal
OWEA Annual Conference, Sandusky, OH, Wednesday, June 24, 3:00-3:45 PM Masses at Massillon: IFAS for Industrial Loads and Nutrient Removal Kristin Waller, O Brien & Gere Kristin.Waller@obg.com #obgpresents
More informationClosed Loop Reactor (CLR) Process. Innovative Technology, Flexible Orientation and Energy Saving Designs
Closed Loop Reactor (CLR) Process Innovative Technology, Flexible Orientation and Energy Saving Designs Lakeside Biological Treatment Processes Lakeside s oxidation ditch experience since 1963 has led
More informationMembrane Bioreactor and High Flow Biological Treatment System for the Cox Creek WRF
Membrane Bioreactor and High Flow Biological Treatment System for the Cox Creek WRF Thor Young, GHD With Contributions from Vince Maillard, Rip Copithorn, Kristi Perri, and Jeff Sturdevant, GHD Dimitrios
More informationCOLD WEATHER NITRIFICATION OF LAGOON EFFLUENT USING A MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR (MBBR) TREATMENT PROCESS
ABSTRACT COLD WEATHER NITRIFICATION OF LAGOON EFFLUENT USING A MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR (MBBR) TREATMENT PROCESS Mr. Flemming G. Wessman 1 and Mr. Chandler H. Johnson 1 AnoxKaldnes, Inc., 58 Weybosset
More informationTaylor Creek Treatment Plant. Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati
Taylor Creek Treatment Plant Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati Who is this guy and what is he talking about? Brad Blankenship Taylor Creek Operator 3.5 years MSD Operator 5.5 years (total)
More informationAqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR
MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR For over three decades, Aqua-Aerobic Systems has led the industry in sequencing batch reactor technology with performance proven and
More informationActivated Sludge Base Notes: for student. Activated Sludge Intro. What is Activated Sludge? 3/12/2012
Activated Sludge Base Notes: for student DMACC 2012 WAT307 Activated Sludge Intro A brief introduction designed to provide basic knowledge of Activated Sludge including some process control basics What
More information<1ppm Phosphorus A BNR With No Chemical Addition Case Study
WWOA 51 st Annual Conference October 2017 Arn Johnson Walker Process Equipment Div. of McNish Corp. arn.johnson@walker-process.com 1 Todd Toelle, Superintendent City of Phillips, WI WWTP Chris Kaempfer,
More informationCopies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS Project No.: April 10, Task A 3100
MEMO To: Jeff Pelz (West Yost) Kathryn Gies (West Yost) Copies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS U.S., Inc. 200 Harvard Mills Square Suite 430 Wakefield Massachusetts 01880 Tel 781 224 4488 Fax 781 224 3033
More informationWastewater Treatment clarifier
Wastewater Treatment Pretreatment During pretreatment, items would normally be removed that would hinder the further processes of treatment. Items commonly removed include roots, rags, cans, or other large
More informationCLR Process. Vertical Loop Configuration
CLR Process Vertical Loop Configuration Vertical Configuration System Flexibility Parallel Operation Raw wastewater and return activated sludge are introduced at a single point in each standard CLR basin.
More informationA H. Marcela Velázquez-Carrillo Consultant to Mountain Systems Inc. on the application of Proficy for Water Treatment
WASTEWATER TREATMENT IINORMATIION TECHNOLOGY SUEZ, parent company of United Water ONDEO, is one of the largest water and wastewater treatment firms in the world. On January 5 th, 1998, United Water Milwaukee
More informationDescription: D05_100_OVW_015_PlantOverview.htm Plant Overview Durham Plant Overview Last Update: October 30, 2013 Purpose:
D05_100_OVW_015_PlantOverview.htm Plant Overview Title: Durham Plant Overview Last Update: October 30, 2013 Purpose: To provide an updated layout of the Durham Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility while
More informationAPPENDIX E: EXISTING FACILITIES DESCRIPTIONS AND DESIGN CRITERIA
Wastewater Treatment Plant Master Plan APPENDIX E: EXISTING FACILITIES DESCRIPTIONS AND DESIGN CRITERIA E THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. APPENDIX E - EXISTING FACILITIES DESCRIPTION AND DESIGN CRITERIA
More informationESTABLISHING A NEW BASELINE
SPECIALTY WORKSHOP CONNECTING THE DOTS: THE IMPACTS OF WATER CONSERVATION ON WASTEWATER TREATMENT JULY 21, 2016 Hosted By: Southern California Alliance of Publicly- Owned Treatment Works Click to Start
More informationNutrient Removal Optimization at the Fairview WWTP
Alyssa Mayer, PE Principal Engineer Nutrient Removal Optimization at the Fairview WWTP Mark Strahota, PE Associate Presentation Overview Project Background Process Model Development BNR Design Considerations
More information