Attachment B: GM Memo a
|
|
- Esmond Oswald Preston
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Attachment B: GM Memo a TO: Partnership Technical Advisory Committee DATE: May 18, 2003 FR: Lisa Klein W.I.: RE: Project Performance Measures for Transportation 2030 (2005 RTP) Legislation enacted in 2002 requires MTC to evaluate all new projects and programs in the 2005 RTP and sets a deadline of July 1, 2003 for the Commission to adopt performance measures. This is a challenging assignment, given the diverse and potentially large number of new investments that may need to be evaluated. A joint committee of P-TAC and the MTC Advisory Council has met regularly on this topic since January. This memo reviews the approach under development. Legislative Requirements Section of the Government Code, added by the 2002 legislation, sets forth three requirements: 1. MTC must establish performance measurement criteria at the project and corridor level by July 1, MTC must adopt goals and measurable objectives for RTP corridors. 3. MTC must evaluate all new projects and programs (investments) in the 2004 RTP. The results of MTC s evaluation would be considered by CMAs as they assemble their new lists of projects for the financially constrained 2005 RTP. Corridor Goals and Objectives We plan to recommend that the six existing RTP Goals serve as overarching corridor goals. Through discussions with the joint committee we have defined five categories of universal corridor objectives that would serve as the basis for the performance measures in all RTP corridors for the 2005 RTP. (See Attachment A.) This approach reflects the general support voiced early on for a common set of corridor objectives that provide a basis for evaluating projects across corridors. We are aware there is continued interest in identifying more detailed, corridor-specific objectives for the RTP. We will continue to work with CMAs and others through the RTP public involvement process to develop specific objectives for each RTP corridor pivoting off the universal corridor objective framework. The corridor management objectives from the 2001 RTP provide a starting point, along with comments already received from this group and others. The RTP corridor management objectives will refine those in the current RTP and could be used for subsequent project performance evaluations such as may be conducted in a new corridor study or future RTP update. Performance Measures Framework The approach being developed by the joint committee has two main elements: 1. Project Needs Assessment MTC would use a blend of quantitative and qualitative indicators to assess future conditions or needs in the areas targeted by specific projects. Future needs would be
2 RTP Project Performance Measures Page 2 assessed with respect to each group of corridor objectives. Wherever possible, the measures for this analysis are based on quantitative data extracted from the MTC travel demand model. A main advantage of the needs-based project measures is that they can be calculated consistently for a wide range of projects and programs. 2. Corridor Benefits Analysis MTC would calculate user benefits, accessibility changes, and emissions changes at the corridor level for packages of investments using the regional travel demand model. We would probably try to group the investments into three region-wide alternatives for modeling and extract data at the corridor level. We propose this approach because it would be difficult to discern the benefits of individual investments and because the legislation calls for corridor-level analysis. This analysis also will capture interactive effects. In addition, those proposing projects would provide cost information in accordance with MTC guidelines to be developed over the summer. The guidelines will address inclusion of project support costs in total capital cost estimates, as well as estimation of annualized capital cost and net annual operating and maintenance cost. Attachment B lists the measures in general terms and illustrates how the results could be summarized by corridor. For each applicable measure, projects would be rated based on a standardized scale and these results presented along side project cost estimates. Attachment C shows the specific measures under consideration. Process and Schedule for Evaluation Some milestones in the evaluation process are discussed below. Attachment D lays out the schedule for evaluation relative to the overall RTP development process. Preliminary List for Evaluation (July 2003). MTC would work with the CMAs to develop a preliminary list of investments for evaluation. The CMAs would help identify projects by traditional sponsors. Members of the public would submit proposals to MTC and the CMAs and would be encouraged to consult with CMA staff prior to the submittal. Sponsors with projects in more than one county would submit proposals to MTC with copies to the affected CMAs. Projects that would likely seek Track 1 funding if approved as part of new sales tax measures prior to adoption of the 2005 RTP should be identified at this stage. MTC would provide a preliminary estimate of new Track 1 revenues for each county to help guide this process. To provide a reasonable range of alternatives, the estimated RTP-cost of the resulting list should not exceed twice the estimated new Track 1 funds. Existing Track 1 Investments. Existing Track 1 investments would be subject to evaluation only if they have significant changes in scope or significant increases in costs funded with RTP revenues. Projects in this category should be identified in July. An increase in RTP-cost is significant if it is more than 30% of the previous amount funded with RTP revenues. Projects would not be subject to evaluation once they were in the TIP. In recognition of the region s established fix-it first policy, maintenance and rehabilitation programs for which cost increases are based on more current information or new methodology would not be subject to evaluation. Screening and Refined List for Evaluation (August September 2003). MTC and the CMAs would jointly screen investments and develop a refined list. The following screening criteria identify investments that would not be evaluated: Investment is not defined sufficiently to generate sketch level data for evaluation Investment is proposed to replace an existing Track 1 project Investment was studied and rejected in a recently completed corridor/major investment study The cost of the investment is not reasonable in proportion to estimated new Track 1 funds (i.e. a single project should not require more than 40% of estimated Track 1 funds)
3 RTP Project Performance Measures Page 3 There is not a reasonable guarantee of operating funds Investment has a fatal environmental flaw Investment requires a change in law or regulations to be funded or implemented Proposal is a broad policy (e.g. value pricing, smart growth) rather than a project Projects for which a willing sponsor has not been identified would be eligible for evaluation; however, a willing and eligible sponsor must be identified by May 2004 in order to include the project in the RTP. MTC Evaluation (October 2003 January 2004). In order to focus on the investments with regional significance, MTC would start with projects that are on the MTS and above a total cost threshold between $5 and $10 million. (Note that all transit is considered to be on the MTS.) MTC would request more complete project information at this stage, including a discussion of benefits, cost estimates in accordance with MTC guidelines, and definition for modeling. The results would be available for CMA-led outreach efforts in early Use of Evaluation Results (February May 2004). The purpose of the evaluation is to inform - but not blindly dictate - the selection of new projects for in the 2005 RTP. To recognize this, CMAs would submit to MTC a narrative description of how the evaluation results were used to develop the financially constrained lists for Track 1 due in May MTC would do the same for regional commitments. Near Term Next Steps To meet the legislated deadline, MTC s Planning and Operations Committee will consider this item on June 13, and the full Commission will consider it on June 25. We intend to check back with the Joint P-TAC and Advisory Council Committee at a number of key points over the summer and fall including: Development of initial list of projects based on submittals (July 2003) Results from testing the measures against a few example projects (August 2003). Development of refined list of projects based on screening (September 2003) Definition of projects packages for the corridor benefits analysis (September October 2003). J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership TAC\2003 Items\03 Memos\May 27\RTP Performance Measures.doc
4 Attachment A Recommended Corridor Objectives for RTP Performance Measures Maintain the system Reduce maintenance and rehabilitation shortfalls Improve system safety Minimize injuries and loss of life in event of seismic failure, collisions or other safety or security incidents Accommodate future person travel and freight while preserving or improving travel time Operate the system more reliably Operate the system more efficiently Increase person capacity and reduce bottlenecks through strategic expansion Increase convenience for persons and freight Operate the system more reliably Improve system connectivity Improve access between communities and activity centers Operate the system with greater attention to customer service Maximize external benefits and minimize disbenefits Improve the environment and public health Improve community vitality Address equity by providing access to jobs and services for the region s most disadvantaged households
5 Project Needs Assessment Attachment B Illustration of Evaluation Summary for Corridor X Maintenance Safety (1) Wear and tear Seismic (vehicles, % number 2025 trucks, users passenger and Other recent revenue vehicle collision record miles) (past 3 years) Trips and Travel Time Reliability Crowding (V/C ratio or load factor) Efficiency & Capacity Crowding or change in travel time from today to 2025 Illustrative Projects* (grouped by main objective in order of objective priority) Objective Categories External Benefits Convenience Access & Connectivity (2) Air Quality Noise Connectivity Access & Is project a Highway or rail Customer Service Number TCM? volumes in area of potential beneficiaries of project (vehicles or transit riders) in 2025 Freight Access change in travel time to ports/ airports Community Vitality Equity Number of trips Is project part in zone where project is located Is project part of community based plan? of a lifeline network or supports this network? Additional Benefits/ Comments Annualized Capital Cost(3) (millions) Net Annual O&M Total Annualized Objective: Maintenance Non-pavement maintenance H NA NA NA NA NA NA NA $ 14.8 $ 14.8 Repair of erosion on XX roadway M NA NA NA NA NA NA NA $ 1.1 $ 1.1 Objective: Safety Pax rail grade separations NA H NA NA NA NA NA NA $ 8.0 $ 8.0 Objective: Convenience I-XXX local access improvements NA NA L H+ NA NA NA NA Connects to freight distribution center $ 0.4 $ 0.4 Bicycle trail gap closure NA M NA M NA NA L NA $ 0.1 $ 0.1 Downtown transit center NA NA M H NA NA M L $ 0.5 $ 0.5 Objective: Trips and Travel Time Widen local roadway from 2 to 4 lanes NA NA M NA NA NA H NA Serves redevelopment area $ 0.2 $ 0.1 $ 0.3 Regional express bus route NA NA H NA M NA NA H Serves W2W market $ 0.7 $ 4.3 $ 5.0 Objective: External Benefits Soundwalls NA NA NA NA NA L NA NA $ 2.2 $ 2.2 Zero emissions vehicles and fleet facilities H NA NA NA H NA NA NA $ 6.0 $ 6.0 Notes: H indicates a high rating for the applicable measure (1) Rating weighted to recognize investments that have safety benefits for more than one mode. M indicates a medium rating (2) Rating weighted to recognize investments that have benefits for passenger and freight access. L indicates a low rating (3) Costs based on RTP commitments for similar investments in Track 1 and Blueprint.
6 Corridor Evaluation Attachment B Illustration of Evaluation Summary for Corridor X Corridor Benefits Relative to 2001 RTP Cost (mill) User Benefits Change in Accessibility (avg travel time) 1. Package 1 $15 million -2 minute 2. Package 2 $10 million -1 minutes 3. Package 3 $30 million -1.0 minutes Change in Emissions (tons per day) ROG: XX NOx: XX Annualized Capital Net Annual O&M Total Annualized PM10: XX $30 $5 $35 ROG: XX NOx: XX PM10: XX $40 $10 $50 ROG: XX NOx: XX PM10: XX $60 $10 $70 Description of Packages: Package 1: Brief description List of Projects Package 2: Brief description List of Projects Package 3: Brief description List of Projects
7 Attachment C Performance Measures Under Consideration Project Needs Assessment Objective Group/ Aspect Measured Measures from Travel Model Other Measures Rationale Maintain the System Pavement shortfall Non pavement shortfall 2025 vehicle trips factored for percent trucks Transit rehab shortfall 2025 daily passenger miles per vehicle 1 + daily vehicle miles per vehicle 2 Reflection of pavement use and need to maintain existing roads. More trucks indicates higher need. Measure does not really reflect need for nonpavement but may be a surrogate. Reflection of wear and tear on vehicles based both on passenger use and mileage. Improve Safety Seismic safety Number of users of facility in 2025 State highways only: Is facility on lifeline system? Motor vehicle safety State roads - Average collision rate per million vehicle miles traveled (current 3 year average)* Other roads Average number of collisions per year (current 3-year average)* Bike/ped safety Grade crossing safety Average number of collisions per year (current 3-year average)* Transit safety and security Rate of incidents by incident type (e.g., collision, violent crime, non-collision injury) per passenger miles traveled over past 3 years* Number persons at risk in event of failure. For state highways, attach more importance to facilities on the lifeline system, which is considered critical to emergency response Identifies current safety concerns Identifies current safety concerns Identifies current safety concerns 1 Calculate as [2003 average trip length] x [2025 forecasted trips]; average trip length provided by operator; 2025 forecasted trips by operator from regional travel model. Use number of vehicles from Finance Plan. 2 Not sure how to calculate daily vehicle miles in * Information provided by sponsor when project submitted
8 Attachment C Performance Measures Under Consideration Objective Group/ Aspect Measured Measures from Travel Model Other Measures Rationale Accommodate Growth in Person Travel from now to 2025 and Preserve or Improve Travel Time Make existing capacity more V/C or transit load factor at corridor reliable screenlines in 2025 More efficient use of existing capacity Construct/create new capacity Some Alternatives Measures of congestion/crowding: For roads 2025 V/C ratio at screenlines; calculate separate V/C ratios for mixed flow and HOV lanes. For Transit 2025 load factors 3 at screenlines Measures relating to user travel time: Change in average travel time per traveler by mode from 2000 to 2025 between selected corridor origins and destinations As system approaches capacity, incidents and breakdowns have more severe reliability impacts Projects would be associated with one of the objectives. As crowding increases, efficiency gains or capacity increases are needed. Calculate separate V/C ratios for HOV lanes to reflect person carrying capacity differential. If average travel time has deteriorated significantly from today to 2025 assuming no improvement, then more efficient use of existing capacity or additional corridor capacity may be warranted. Increase user convenience Improve connectivity o Interchange or local road network improvements o Transit improvements o Bicycle gap closures Improve access for passengers to transit and regional highway system Vehicles using facilities in 2025 Transferring transit riders in 2025 Interchange volumes in 2025 Transit station boardings in 2025 Potential bike users* Is project recommended in MTC Transit Connectivity Study? Population and job growth in zones around transit or highway system ( ) Use indicates importance of improved connections and potential beneficiaries Indicates a need for improved access Improve access to regional freight network Change in travel time to/from ports and airports from selected origins and destinations ( ) Indicates need for improvements to preserve access Customer service improvements Estimates of number of customers who would benefit by program (2025)* Potential beneficiaries 3 For rail, calculate 2025 load factors based on station boardings and egresses; for buses, use operator data on current load factors and factor up for overall growth in operator trips or corridor transit trips in * Information provided by sponsor when project submitted
9 Attachment C Performance Measures Under Consideration Objective Group/ Aspect Measured Measures from Travel Model Other Measures Rationale External Benefits Air Quality Is project a TCM in federal or state plan? Noise reduction Highway volumes in proximity of project (or number of trains for rail noise considerations) Community vitality Number of trips in zone where project is located Is project from a community based transportation plan?* Equity Is project part of Lifeline transit network or supports this network? Individual project air quality impacts will be minor (see corridor user benefits) Noise exposure related to use Potential beneficiaries Evidence of planning basis for project Evidence of planning basis for project Corridor Benefit Measures Measure from Corridor Benefit Travel Model Mobility User benefit: Value of time saved for all modes (transit, auto, non-motorized, and trucks) and change in traveler out-ofpocket costs for all trips within the corridor. Out-of-pocket costs include transit fares, bridge tolls, parking, and auto operating costs (fuel, maintenance, oil) Accessibility Change in average travel time for all trips within corridor Rationale Similar to prior systems level analysis, but at corridor level; includes benefits to freight as well as passengers. This measure captures travel time savings. Reflects spatial proximity of activities as well as impacts of transportation system improvements. Air quality Change in vehicle trips and VMT; uses EMFAC2002 for emission levels for ozone and PM Air quality impacts best estimated at corridor level. * Information provided by sponsor when project submitted
10 Attachment D Schedule of RTP Performance Evaluation and RTP Milestones 2004 RTP Outreach Milestones Polling/Focus Groups Qtr. 2 Qtr. 3 Qtr. 4 Qtr. 1 Qtr. 2 Qtr. 3 Qtr. 4 Qtr. 1 Qtr. 2 Qtr. Phase 1: Regional Phase 2: Local Phase 3: Hearings RTP Summit Regional Workshops: Complete: 11/04 Meeting: 9/03-11/03 CMA Outreach: 6/14/03 1/04-6/03 Complete: 9/04 Key 2004 RTP Decision Milestones Initial Final 1 RTP Revenue Projections 2 Identify Regional and County Proposed RTP Investment Strategies/Criteria Regional Expenditure Plans Local Sales Tax 3 Complete Modeling/Conformity of RTP and EIR 4 Release Draft EIR for Public Review 5 Release Draft 2004 RTP for Public Review 6 Commission Adoption of 2004 RTP 7 Federal Conformity Approval of 2004 RTP Project Performance Measures Establish performance measure criteria MTC tests performance measures on sample projects MTC develops summary of corridor conditions/needs in 2025 MTC and CMAs jointly screen projects on preliminary list (See #2 above) Refined list of projects for regional evaluation with complete information from proposers MTC conducts Project-Specific Needs Assessment and Corridor Benefits Analysis Complete: 6/03 Complete:7/1/03 Complete: 12/03 Preliminary Final Complete: 7/03 Complete: 5/04 6/03-8/03 8/03 5/03-9/03 9/03 Nov. election - SF Mar. election - $3 Bridge Toll Complete: 1/04 8/04 9/04 9/04 Nov. election - Regional Gas Ta Nov. election - CC Mar, Son, SMART 1/05 3/05 Review results with proposers and CMAs 2/04 CMAs submit narrative on how performance measures used to develop Track 1 lists 5/04
Unified Corridor Investment Study Performance Dashboard
Unified Corridor Investment Study Performance Dashboard October 2018 Project Description Three parallel routes - Highway 1, Soquel/Freedom and the Santa Cruz Branch Rail Line - link the communities along
More informationPerformance Dashboard
Unified Corridor Investment Study Performance Dashboard Step 2 Analysis Results DRAFT Revised 11/08/18 October 2018 Project Description Three parallel routes - Highway 1, Soquel/Freedom and the Santa Cruz
More informationPerformance Dashboard
Unified Corridor Investment Study Performance Dashboard Step 2 Analysis Results DRAFT Revised 10/15/18 October 2018 Project Description Three parallel routes - Highway 1, Soquel/Freedom and the Santa Cruz
More information2040 Addendum Performance-Based Planning November 2018
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan 2040 Addendum Performance-Based Planning November 2018 Adopted June 13, 2018 250 S. Orange Ave, Suite 200, Orlando, FL 32801 407-481-5672 www.metroplanorlando.org MetroPlan
More informationHighest Priority Performance Measures for the TPP
Highest Priority Performance Measures for the TPP The following list of measures are the highest priority performance measures as identified by modal working groups. These groups consist of staff from
More informationPerformance Measures Workshop, May 18, 2017
Measuring What Matters: Above and Beyond Requirements Performance Measures Workshop, May 18, 2017 Presentation Overview Background - origin and evolution of the Regional Outcomes Framework. Regional Outcomes
More informationACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Memphis MPO March 30, 2015
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE Memphis MPO March 30, 2015 Agenda Welcome & Introductions Announcements and Briefings Livability 2040: Regional Transportation Plan Congestion Management Process
More informationAlternatives Analysis
Alternatives Analysis Evaluation Framework Report Prepared for: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority Prepared by: AECOM/JJG Joint Venture Atlanta, GA November 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary
More informationGOALS AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES
PLANNING FRAMEWORK The planning framework guides the development of the Regional Transportation Plan, articulating what the region is trying to achieve. This chapter establishes a foundation to focus data-gathering
More informationFACT SHEETS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
FACT SHEETS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY WHAT IS THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/ SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY (RTP/SCS) Every four years the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) prepares
More information2016 RTP/SCS Performance Measures Update Technical Working Group
2016 RTP/SCS Performance Measures Update Technical Working Group March 19, 2015 Ping Chang & Naresh Amatya SCAG Staff Presentation Outline Background Evolving/Enhanced Performance Measures (PM) Framework
More informationFACT SHEETS LOS ANGELES COUNTY
FACT SHEETS LOS ANGELES COUNTY WHAT IS THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/ SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY (RTP/SCS) Every four years the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) prepares a
More informationMOBILITY 2045: A FOCUS ON TRANSPORTATION CHOICE:
Mobility 2045: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for North Central Texas is the defining vision for the multimodal transportation system in the Dallas- Fort Worth Metropolitan Planning Area. The plan,
More informationRESOLUTION NO
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-12 RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDING THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN: 2017-2020 WHEREAS, the Southeastern
More informationMoving Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Bicycle Mobility Master Plan Transit Master Plan
Moving Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Bicycle Mobility Master Plan Transit Master Plan Paul DiGiuseppe Assistant Chief, Division of Planning Department of Administration (DOA) Needed to keep
More informationSummary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans
SMTC 2050 Long Range Transportation Plan Appendix A: Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans SMTC 2050 Long Range Transportation Plan Summary of transportation-related
More informationRTP-SCS Preferred Scenario. October 18,
RTP-SCS Preferred Scenario October 18, 2012 1 Summary Seek Board direction on Preferred Scenario to prepare draft RTP-SCS and EIR. Clarify scenario definitions / review performance results. Other MPOs
More informationAlameda Countywide Transportation Plan Update Evaluation Outcomes
TAWG Meeting 07/14/11 Attachment 06 Handout Alameda Countywide Transportation Plan Update Evaluation Outcomes presented to Technical Advisory Working Group presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. July
More informationThe Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Public Meetings January 2016
The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for North Central Texas Public Meetings January 2016 Presentation Agenda Mobility 2040 Draft Recommendations 2016 Transportation Conformity RTC Policy Bundle Concept
More information2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014
2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014 1 About the plan Long-range transportation plan for the Twin
More informationPennDOT Office of Planning
Every Voice Counts PennDOT Office of Planning Environmental Justice Plan Executive Summary Developed for: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Office of Planning Center for Program Development and
More informationThe Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Public Meetings February 2016
The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for North Central Texas Public Meetings February 2016 Presentation Agenda Mobility 2040 Draft Recommendations RTC Policy Bundle Concept Transportation Improvement Program
More informationCHAPTER 2. VISION, GOALS AND MTP FRAMEWORK
CHAPTER 2. VISION, GOALS AND MTP FRAMEWORK MTP VISION In order to create a framework for the 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), a vision statement was drafted by the Vision/Goals Committee and
More informationLivability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. Transportation Policy Board (TPB) August 23, 2018
Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update Transportation Policy Board (TPB) August 23, 2018 1 Oct. 2017 Plan Kick-Off Sept. 2019 Plan Adoption Timeline Livability 2050 Regional Transportation
More informationChapter 10 Goals, Objectives + Policies
Chapter 10 Goals, + Policies Warehouse on Nestle Way near I-78 114 115 10.1 ESTABLISHMENT OF CONSISTENT GOALS 10.2 NATIONAL FREIGHT GOALS The Lehigh Valley s freight transportation investment decisions
More informationPerformance Measures for Transportation Planning Part 1
Performance Measures for Transportation Planning Part 1 Flint, MI July 12, 2011 Brian Betlyon FHWA Resource Center Overview Performance Measurement in Transportation Planning Module Outcomes Describe performance
More informationSCS Scenario Planning
E SCS Scenario Planning Introduction As part of the 2035 MTP/SCS process, AMBAG developed a series of land use and transportation alternative scenarios for evaluation and testing to demonstrate how the
More informationMobility and System Reliability Goal
Mobility and System Reliability Goal Provide surface transportation infrastructure and services that will advance the efficient and reliable movement of people and goods throughout the state. Background:
More informationCHAPTER 3 THE BUILDING BLOCKS POLICIES AND SUPPORTIVE STRATEGIES REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY
CHAPTER 3 THE BUILDING BLOCKS POLICIES AND SUPPORTIVE STRATEGIES REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY CHAPTER 3 THE BUILDING BLOCKS POLICIES AND SUPPORTIVE STRATEGIES INTRODUCTION
More informationINDIANA S INTERMODAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Stephen C. Smith Planning Manager, Transportation Planning Division Indiana Department of Transportation
96 INDIANA S INTERMODAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Stephen C. Smith Planning Manager, Transportation Planning Division Indiana Department of Transportation Indiana is in the process of developing an Intermodal
More informationRegional Performance Measures Annual Progress Report TPO Board - 2/4/2016 Presentation by: Chris Wichman, Senior Planner
2015 TPO Board - 2/4/2016 Presentation by: Chris Wichman, Senior Planner Overview History and definition of performance-based planning & programming Review of 2015 TPO Board Action Requested 2 History
More informationMONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE
12 MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE The FAST Act continues the legislation authorized under MAP-21, which created a data-driven, performance-based multimodal program to address the many challenges
More informationEnergy Savings by replacing old facility o Energy savings o Emissions
Dubuque Intermodal Transportation Center Cost / Benefit Analysis Input values used in this analysis are taken from the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) guidance on the preparation of Cost Benefit
More informationMAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports
MAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports September 20, 2012 American Association of Port Authorities 703.684.5700 www.aapa-ports.org 3 New Freight Eligibility in Core Highway Formula Programs Surface Transportation
More informationThe Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.
4 Goals & Objectives INTRODUCTION The 2015-2040 MTP preserves and promotes the quality of life and economic prosperity of the MAB by providing a transportation system consistent with the regional goals.
More informationProposed Comprehensive Update to the State of Rhode Island s Congestion Management Process
Proposed Comprehensive Update to the State of Rhode Island s Statewide Planning Program January 2018 Summary Outline of of Action Steps 1. Develop Objectives for Congestion Management What is the desired
More informationGUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM
M E T R O P O L I TAN TRA NS P O RTATI O N PLAN GUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM El Paso Metropolitan Planning Organization INTRODUCTION The guiding principles for development of the El Paso MPO s Destino
More informationPurpose and Organization PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. Native American Consultation Workshop
PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Native American Consultation Workshop A Presentation by the Southern California Association of Governments October, 2015 Purpose and Organization Introduction Draft
More informationCost / Benefit Analysis Table 1: Input variables used in Cost / Benefit Analysis Parameters Units Values General External Costs -Vehicles
Cost / Benefit Analysis Input values used in this analysis are taken from the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) guidance on the preparation of Cost Benefit Analyses, including the recently published
More information9.0 Meeting the Challenges
9.0 Meeting the Challenges 9.1 SLRTP Goals The SLRTP is built around the six TxDOT Strategic Plan goals. 1. Develop an organizational structure and strategies designed to address the future multimodal
More informationFreight and Rail Stakeholder Webinar. January 7, 2014
Freight and Rail Stakeholder Webinar January 7, 2014 Agenda Modal Needs Baseline Revenue Modal Scenarios Website Statewide Freight Plan Statewide Rail Plan Jeff Carroll MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION NEEDS
More informationTri-County Regional Planning Commission 2045 Regional Metropolitan Transportation Plan Goals and Objectives Adopted March 22, 2017
Tri-County Regional Planning Commission 2045 Regional Metropolitan Transportation Plan Goals and Objectives Adopted March 22, 2017 One of the initial steps in the development of the TCRPC 2045 Metropolitan
More informationIntroduction. CHAPTER 2: Introduction 13
02 Introduction CHAPTER 2: Introduction 13 14 2018 Draft Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy 2 INTRODUCTION The Stanislaus Council of Government s 2018 Regional Transportation
More informationWELCOME. Schedule. Contact Information. Please Provide Written Comments
WELCOME Schedule April 18, 2012 Open House: 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. Project Presentation: 7:00 p.m. Mary Ellen Henderson Middle School 7130 Leesburg Pike Falls Church, VA 2203 Contact Information Kala Leggett
More informationMPO Member Communities:
MPO Member Communities: The MPO is federally required to update its long-range transportation plan every five years. Efforts are currently underway to develop a new plan: Mobilizing Tomorrow. Mobilizing
More information2016 Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy for Butte County
2016 Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy for Butte County Public Outreach Workshop (Round #4) September 2016 Prepared by: Ivan Garcia, Programming Manager Butte County Association
More informationVISION STATEMENT, MISSION STATEMENT, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
VISION STATEMENT, MISSION STATEMENT, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Vision Statement: Our vision is to provide a high quality, safe, efficient, and cost-effective multi-modal transportation system that supports
More informationWill County Freight Advisory Council Meeting. April 11, 2017
Will County Freight Advisory Council Meeting April 11, 2017 1 Agenda Summary of Last Meeting Plan Progress and Update Performance Measures Break-Out Discussion Projects and Project Evaluation Criteria
More informationPerformance Management & Goals
Management & The Nevada Freight Plan is a performance-based plan, in compliance with Title 23, Highways, of the United s Code, that defines performance measures and targets for each goal and objective
More informationBenefit Cost Analysis Narrative
Chicago Region Environmental and Transportation Efficiency Program (CREATE) Grade Separations of: GS21a - Union Pacific and 95 th Street GS11 - Belt Railway Company of Chicago and Columbus Ave. GS 9 -
More information6 CHARTING PERFORMANCE
DRAFT 6 CHARTING PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW OF PERFORMANCE BASED PLANNING Background of Performance Based Planning Increasingly, over the past two decades, transportation agencies have been utilizing performance
More informationBow Concord I-93 Improvements City of Concord Transportation Policy Advisory Committee
Bow Concord I-93 Improvements City of Concord Transportation Policy Advisory Committee December 15, 2016 Agenda Project History / Project Development Process Traffic Modeling Alternatives Development o
More informationSR 710 Environmental Study
SR 710 Environmental Study Alternatives Analysis s Technical Advisory Committee Meeting No. 5 May 9, 2012 1 1 Agenda > Recap of TAC Meeting No. 4 > Recommended alternative concepts for conceptual engineering
More informationI-710 Project Committee Meeting
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority I-710 Project Committee Meeting January 29, 2009 Meeting Expectations Review I-710 planning context Concur on a port cargo forecast scenario to
More informationNEW YORK TRANSPORTATION FACTS ECONOMIC IMPACTS
The 2015 U.S. Transportation Construction Industry Profile: New York page 1 NEW YORK TRANSPORTATION FACTS ECONOMIC IMPACTS The design, construction and maintenance of transportation infrastructure in New
More informationAIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS: VISUALIZE 2045 SCOPE OF WORK
December 14, 2017 AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS: VISUALIZE 2045 SCOPE OF WORK I. INTRODUCTION Projects solicited for the quadrennial update of the region s transportation plan, Visualize 2045, and the
More informationAppendix O Congestion Management Program REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY
Appendix O Congestion Management Program REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY 2014 REGIONAL CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2014 RTP/SCS APPENDIX O SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
More informationI-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Capital Beltway in Northern Virginia, USA
15th International Conference on Managed Lanes I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Capital Beltway in Northern Virginia, USA Case Study for Funding of Transit Service and Transportation Demand Management
More informationThe New SFMTA Strategic Plan
Strategic Plan The New SFMTA Strategic Plan Progress Report SFMTA Citizens Advisory Council Briefing January 4, 2018 Agenda Overview of strategic planning process Discussion of the new plan elements and
More informationAppendix A: Project Planning and Development A-1 White Paper on Transit and the Tappan Zee Hudson River Crossing Project
Appendix A: Project Planning and Development A-1 White Paper on Transit and the Tappan Zee Hudson River Crossing Project Purpose of White Paper White Paper on Transit and the Tappan Zee Hudson River Crossing
More informationDatabase and Travel Demand Model
Database and Travel Demand Model 7 The CMP legislation requires every CMA, in consultation with the regional transportation planning agency (the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) in the Bay
More informationPlanning. i.e. the Regional Transportation Plan. TTP220 S. Handy 4/18/16
Planning i.e. the Regional Transportation Plan TTP220 S. Handy 4/18/16 In the news today Authorization bills: intended $ Appropriations bills: actual $ The Senate Appropriations Committee will review transportation
More informationTransportation 2040 Toward a Sustainable Transportation System. Toward a Sustainable Transportation System. Sultan Planning Board.
1 Transportation 2040 Toward a Sustainable Transportation System Sultan Planning Board February 1, 2011 PSRC - Who We Represent 2 Our Region 4 Counties 82 Cities and Towns Urban & Rural Our Members Cities,
More informationBackground. Purpose of This Phase of Project Development
Background Purpose of This Phase of Project Development Analyze costs and benefits of commuter rail and bus rapid transit in corridor Refine and update alternatives considered to date Update costs and
More informationTRANSPORTATION 101 Today and Tomorrow. Moving People and Goods
TRANSPORTATION 101 Today and Tomorrow Moving People and Goods What is the Transportation Commission? An independent, seven-member body of citizens appointed by the Governor for six-year terms and representing
More informationFinal Congestion Management Process
Final Congestion Management Process 2015 Prepared by Tulare County Association of Governments 210 N. Church St., Suite B Visalia, California 93291 1. Introduction: What Is Congestion? Congestion can generally
More informationLARKSPUR SMART STATION AREA PLAN. Public Workshop December 3, 2013
LARKSPUR SMART STATION AREA PLAN Public Workshop December 3, 2013 0 PURPOSE OF Provide information about the regional planning context for the Larkspur Station Area, including Plan Bay Area, SMART, and
More informationREGIONAL VISION REGIONAL GOALS
REGIONAL VISION Greater Kansas City is a region of opportunity. Its robust economy, healthy environment and social capacity support the creativity, diversity and resilience of its people, places and communities.
More informationRTC Mobility Plan Workshop. North Central Texas Council of Governments July 9, 2015
RTC Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments July 9, 2015 Agenda 1. Introduction to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) 2. New Planning Parameters 3. Emerging Planning and
More information6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS
6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS 6.1 MODEL RUN SUMMARY NOTEBOOK The Model Run Summary Notebook (under separate cover) provides documentation of the multiple
More informationAn Overview of Transportation Issues in the NY Metro Area July 26, 2010
An Overview of Transportation Issues in the NY Metro Area July 26, 2010 Joel P. Ettinger, Executive Director New York Metropolitan Transportation Council Forecast of Riders Urbanized Area Project Daily
More information2012 Regional Transportation Plan for Butte County Public Outreach Workshops
2012 Regional Transportation Plan for Butte County Public Outreach Workshops August 5, 2011 Oroville August 8, 2011 Paradise August 8, 2011 Gridley August 12, 2011 Chico 11:00 a.m. 1:00 p.m. 12:00 p.m.
More informationHB2 Implementation Policy Guide
report HB2 Implementation Policy Guide prepared for Commonwealth Transportation Board date March 18, 2015 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 9 1.1 HB2 Legislation Requirements... 10 House Bill 1887...
More informationMETRA UP-W LINE. Locally Preferred Alternative Report
METRA UP-W LINE Cook, Kane, and DuPage Counties Illinois Alternatives Analysis Study Document #9 Locally Preferred Alternative Report August 13, 2007 Prepared by Parsons Alternatives Analysis Documents
More informationINVESTMENT SCENARIOS CHAPTER Illustrative Investment Approaches Public Outreach 6-1
CHAPTER 6 As detailed in Chapters 4 and 5, Texas multimodal transportation needs estimated at $21 billion annually (2014 constant dollars) illustrated in Exhibit 4-12 far outstrip the approximately $9.1
More informationHighway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAB September 20, 2017
Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan TAB September 20, 2017 Today s Topics Where are we now, what are the current issues? Where do we want to go? How will we get there? What are the
More informationSAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA: COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS CASE STUDY HON. STEVE KINSEY
SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA: COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS CASE STUDY HON. STEVE KINSEY PERFORMANCE MEASURES TRANSPORTATION S BRIDGE TO A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE Steve Kinsey Metropolitan Transportation Commission Transportation
More informationCharlotte Region HOV/HOT/Managed Lanes Analysis. Technical Memorandum Task 1.3 EVALUATION CRITERIA
Charlotte Region HOV/HOT/Managed Lanes Analysis Technical Memorandum Task 1.3 EVALUATION CRITERIA October 23, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EVALUATION PROCESS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationTRANSPORTATION PLAN Donald Vary
LOUISIANA STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Donald Vary March 2, 2016 AGENDA Plan Development Decision-Making Process Outreach Activities Vision and Goals Transportation Needs Financial Analysis (revenue scenarios
More informationPublic Meeting. January 26, 2012 Fulton County North Service Center
Public Meeting January 26, 2012 Fulton County North Service Center Today s Meeting Purpose 2 Why is the GA 400 Corridor Project Study Needed? Key Themes from Existing Conditions Your Input! o o Draft Purpose
More informationDemand Reduction Assumptions Used For Travel Demand Analysis of EIS Alternatives
M E M O R A N D U M Demand Reduction Assumptions Used For Travel Demand Analysis of EIS Alternatives TO: FROM: Project Management Team Steve Perone/PTV America DATE: Revised: February 6, 2009 Background
More informationReconstruction Project Update
I-65/I-70 North Split Interchange Reconstruction Project Update September 18, 2017 Agenda Welcome/introductions Project overview Scope and limits Need Environmental Assessment Maintenance of traffic Financial
More informationGoing Forward The Plan to Maintain & Improve Mobility Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Going Forward The Plan to Maintain & Improve Mobility Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What is Going Forward The Plan to Maintain & Improve Mobility (Plan) and why does the region need a Long Range Transportation
More information2004 FEASIBILITY STUDY UPDATE
Austin-San Antonio Intermunicipal Commuter Rail District 2004 FEASIBILITY STUDY UPDATE December 2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Almost 3 million people in Central Texas, living and working between
More informationSection 7 Environmental Constraints
Section 7 Environmental Constraints i Yakima Valley Metropolitan and Regional Transportation Plan Public Comment DRAFT 1/27/2016 Environmental Constraints Analysis A programmatic-level review of potential
More informationLong-Range Plan Task Force: Draft Analysis Results
Long-Range Plan Task Force: Draft Analysis Results November 15, 2017 Prepared for: National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Transportation Planning Board Item #9 Presentation Components Analysis
More informationPLAN 2040 Regional Transportation Plan Update. Final Recommendations. Transportation and Air Quality Committee March 13, 2014
PLAN 2040 Regional Transportation Plan Update Final Recommendations Transportation and Air Quality Committee March 13, 2014 TIP/RTP Update Milestones Official public comment period closed February 21 Final
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2050
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2050 Introduction Goals Policies, and Performance Measures Growth Forecast and Planned Land Use Development Key Recommendations i Executive Summary April
More information2040 Long Range Transportation Plan
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Executive Summary Adopted April 15, 2013 The Current Situation The George Washington Region includes the City of Fredericksburg and the counties of Caroline, King George,
More informationTransport Domain Plan. Draft list of Enduring Questions
Transport Domain Plan Draft list of Engagement Draft v1.0 August 2014 Introduction The Transport Domain Plan is jointly led by Statistics NZ and the Ministry of Transport. It is a project that will identify
More informationAIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE EVALUATION GUIDANCE
AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE EVALUATION GUIDANCE The following guidance provides additional details regarding the process followed by PSRC to evaluate projects for potential air quality benefits. As
More informationLos Angeles County Congestion Reduction Demonstration Project
Los Angeles County Congestion Reduction Demonstration Project frequently asked questions update #1 /august 2008 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), California Department of
More informationNJTPA Region. Bergen Essex Hudson Hunterdon Jersey City Middlesex Monmouth Morris. Newark Ocean Passaic Somerset Sussex Union Warren
NJTPA Region Bergen Essex Hudson Hunterdon Jersey City Middlesex Monmouth Morris Newark Ocean Passaic Somerset Sussex Union Warren North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority The Metropolitan Planning
More informationTSM/TDM (Transit and Roadway Efficiency) Concept - Analysis and Results
M E M O R A N D U M TSM/TDM (Transit and Roadway Efficiency) Concept - Analysis and Results TO: FROM: Task Force and Oversight Team Steve Perone/PTV America Tim Burkhardt/CH2M HILL DATE: Revised: August
More informationTRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSISGUIDELINES
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSISGUIDELINES ADOPTED OCTOBER2014 SANTACLARAVALLEYTRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY CONGESTION MANAGEMENTPROGRAM CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
More information2035 LRTP Transportation Options Introduction
2035 LRTP Transportation Options Introduction What is the 2035 LRTP? The 2035 Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) is the guide for major transportation investments in the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro
More informationContents i Contents Page 1 A New Transportation Plan Community Involvement Goals and Objectives... 11
Contents i Contents 1 A New Transportation Plan... 1 Why develop a new plan?... 1 What area does the LRTP focus on?... 2 Why is this LRTP important?... 3 Meeting Requirements for Transportation Planning...
More informationCITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES 3.20.2017 PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 55 Railroad Row White River Junction, VT 05001 802.295.4999
More informationJoint Meeting- Stakeholder Committee & Technical Committee
Joint Meeting- Stakeholder Committee & Technical Committee Wednesday, February 26, 2014 Cobb County DOT Squad Room Cobb County Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update 2040 www.cobbinmotion.com - Guiding
More informationHighway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAC August 2, 2017
Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan TAC August 2, 2017 Today s Topics Highway & Freight Where are we now? The Highway Story What are the issues? How is the system performing? Where
More information