Price Formation Education Session Day 1 Economic Dispatch
|
|
- Eric Wade
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Slide 1 Price Formation Education Session Day 1 Economic Dispatch Anthony Giacomoni Melissa Maxwell Laura Walter December 4, 2017
2 Slide 2 Disclaimer Slide This is not a committee meeting. This session is for educational purposes only, to help introduce and clarify different aspects of price formation. The material presented is not necessarily representative of any proposal PJM has or will present in the future. 2
3 Slide 3 Agenda Electricity Market Overview (status quo) Energy market offers Market clearing prices Uplift Unit commitment Economic dispatch Example of Economic Dispatch with Marginal Pricing Explanation of Fast-Start Pricing Questions 3
4 Slide 4 ELECTRICITY MARKET OVERVIEW General Concepts 4
5 Slide 5 Energy Supply Must Be Balanced against the Demand for Power 5 PJM is always balancing the grid the amount of electricity being consumed or lost must equal the amount generated. Because electricity is a speed-of-light product that cannot be stored, PJM must respond instantaneously to changes in demand and operating conditions across its territory. To keep the system in balance, PJM continuously monitors the electric system, reacting to changes in demand, equipment problems, weather conditions and other factors to maintain safe and reliable service while meeting customer needs for electricity when and where it s needed.
6 Slide 6 Energy Market Types Independent system operators (ISOs) and regional transmission organizations (RTOs) in the US have markets employing: Day-Ahead Energy Market Real-Time Energy Market Locational prices 6 The PJM Energy Market procures electricity to meet consumers demands both in real time and in the near term. It includes the sale or purchase of energy in PJM s Real-Time Energy Market (five minutes) and Day-Ahead Market (one day forward). The Day-Ahead Energy Market is the market for tomorrow s energy. The market closes at 10:30 a.m. EPT and results post by 1:30 p.m. EPT. The Real-Time Energy Market happens throughout the day with prices being calculated every five minutes. Locational prices in PJM called locational marginal prices or LMP.
7 Slide 7 Determining Price and Dispatch Unit Commitment Determines which units to turn on (committing) and when based on forecasted load and other requirements. Unit commitment is then fixed going into economic dispatch. Economic Dispatch Determines megawatt output for each resource that is online Locational Prices Determined by solving the economic dispatch Unit Commitment Economic Dispatch Locational Prices 7
8 Slide 8 The Stack and Determining Price 8 Supply offers are ordered from cheapest to most expensive. Then, in order to meet the system load at the lowest possible cost (subject to transmission and operational constraints), a shortterm determination of the optimal output of generation facilities is calculated. However, marginal pricing doesn t guarantee this outcome in pricing, which will be discussed later.
9 Slide 9 ELECTRICITY MARKET OVERVIEW Energy Market Offer 9
10 Slide 10 Components of an Energy Market Offer Three costs compose a resource s offer: Start-up cost ($/start) Incremental energy cost ($/MWh) No-load cost ($/hour) 10
11 Slide 11 What Is Start-up Cost? The start-up cost for a resource is: The cost to get a resource from shutdown to breaker close (i.e., megawatts greater than zero) Determined by various factors (e.g., start-fuel cost, startmaintenance cost) Incurred each time a resource starts up Included in commitment but not in dispatch 11 Start-up costs are defined as the unit costs to bring the boiler, turbine and generator from shutdown conditions to the point after breaker closure. Start-up costs include cost of start fuel, total fuel-related cost, performance factor, electrical costs (station service), start maintenance adder, and additional labor cost if required above normal station manning. Start-up costs can vary with the unit offline time being categorized in three unit temperature conditions: hot, intermediate and cold. Start-up cost is a dollar cost and is incurred once each time the unit operates regardless of the period of operation.
12 Slide 12 What Is Incremental Energy Cost? The incremental energy cost for a resource is: A variable operating cost: includes fuel, variable operating and maintenance cost, etc. Incurred for every megawatt-hour generated Included in commitment and dispatch Non-decreasing 12
13 Slide 13 Why Do We Need a Non-Decreasing Cost Curve? Non-decreasing incremental cost curves ensure that the total cost curve is convex. Why do we need convexity? Ensures that we can find an optimal solution! Otherwise we would not know if any solution we find is optimal. 13
14 Slide 14 What Is Convexity? Convexity refers to the curvature of a function. A function is convex if any straight line you draw across the function does not intersect the function in more than two places. Non-Convex Function more than two intersection points Convex Function only two intersection points 14
15 Slide 15 Examples of Incremental Energy Cost 15
16 Slide 16 What Is No-Load Cost? The true cost for a resource may not always increase across the entire output range. No-load cost is the cost to operate a resource in the inefficient portion of its incremental energy offer curve. No-load cost is included in commitment but not dispatch. Generator Incremental Cost Curve 16 True generator cost may not be always increasing over the entire output range. No-load cost ($/hour) Cost associated with operating a unit in the low (inefficient) portion of its incremental energy offer curve because often a generator s incremental cost curves are not monotonically increasing. So to make an incremental energy offer curve monotonic, a minimum point is set to be its economic minimum. The no-load cost offer can then be used to recover a generators unrecovered costs. The no-load cost is incurred every hour the resource is online.
17 Slide 17 ELECTRICITY MARKET OVERVIEW Market Clearing Prices 17
18 Slide 18 Market Clearing Price In an ideal case, at the market clearing price, there are no incentives to deviate from equilibrium quantity. Equilibrium 18 In a market, prices perform a coordinating function. Producers and consumers react to prices by adjusting their output and consumption. At this market clearing price, producers are willing to supply the exact amount consumers would like to consume (i.e., supply = demand). There is no incentive to deviate from this price and quantity; no group can do better by trading among themselves outside the market.
19 Slide 19 What Is Locational Marginal Price? The locational marginal price (LMP) reflects the incremental cost of supplying the next megawatt of load at a particular location while satisfying all operational constraints. Total Production Cost Incremental energy cost Start-up cost No-load cost Costs Reflected in LMP Incremental energy cost 19 LMP is the cost of optimally supplying an increment of load at a particular location while satisfying all operational constraints. One can think of the LMP as the change in total production cost to deliver an increment of load at a location using the offers submitted to the market. The commitment cannot change in response to an increment in load. LMPs are produced as a result of economic dispatch with the commitment fixed.
20 Slide 20 LMPs and Market Clearing Do LMPs always provide an incentive for units to follow dispatch instruction? They do not incorporate start-up and no-load costs. Not all resources can set price. Uplift payments may be necessary to incent resources to follow dispatch instructions. 20 Inflexible units are not permitted to set price. When the cost of an inflexible unit that is needed to serve demand is precluded from setting price, the LMP does not accurately reflect the true incremental cost to serve load. This LMP limitation can suppress energy and reserve prices and inappropriately increase reliance on the capacity market.
21 Slide 21 ELECTRICITY MARKET OVERVIEW Uplift 21
22 Slide 22 What Is Uplift? Uplift = Make Whole Payments + Lost Opportunity Cost Make-whole payments: Occur when a resource s revenue cannot cover its total costs, including fixed costs like start-up cost and no-load cost. Lost opportunity cost: Occurs when a resource could have made more profit by not following RTO/ISO direction. 22 Currently, offline units that would have profited if they started up are not paid lost opportunity cost in most markets.
23 Slide 23 Example of Make-Whole Payment No recovery Startup cost ($/start) No-load cost ($/hour the resource is online) 23 In this example, the resource s incremental energy cost is equal to the LMP for the entire time the unit is online. In this case, the unit would need to be paid make-whole payments to cover the total cost of operation. Also, in this case, the unit might have an incentive to not follow PJM dispatch if make-whole payments were not available.
24 Slide 24 Example of Lost Opportunity Cost 24 In this example, the resource s incremental energy cost is less than the LMP for the entire time the unit is online. The unit has an incentive to generate more, but the ISO s direction is to stay at economic minimum. The resource has an incentive to not follow dispatch, so it is paid lost opportunity cost.
25 Slide 25 Uplift Drivers Uplift Drivers Unit Parameters Long lead time units Load, interchange and outages under or over forecast Reactive constraints 25
26 Slide 26 Uplift Is Undesirable Uplift payments are exclusive, non-transparent and difficult to hedge Exclusive Only received by some resources Non-transparent Out-of-market payments Difficult to Hedge Cannot be hedged in forward markets 26 Uplift costs are unavoidable as it is often due to restrictions and non-convexities based on the market framework. Uplift is non-transparent to the market. Only the market participant receiving uplift payments has visibility of those payments. From FERC - a failure to make the causes transparent and to price them into the energy and ancillary services markets can undermine the effectiveness of price signals and efficient system utilization, and mute investment signals. Volatile uplift charges may also create financial uncertainty for customers, depress liquidity and reduce market efficiency.
27 Slide 27 ELECTRICITY MARKET OVERVIEW Unit Commitment 27
28 Slide 28 What Is Unit Commitment? The least expensive way of supplying forecasted load in the system, often over an extended time period (e.g., 24 hours) Determines when to turn resources on and off Prices are not determined by solving the unit commitment, due to integer commitment variables. 28 Prices are not determined by solving the unit commitment due to the integer (0,1) commitment variables. Integer commitment variables are 0 or 1 depending on whether the resource is on or off.
29 Slide 29 Unit Commitment Formulation Objective Function Total Production Cost Cost + Start-up Cost + No-Load Cost System Balance Total Generation Total Load Losses = 0 Transmission Constraints The flow on each line must be below its operating limit. Resource Capacity Constraints The output of each resource must be within its operating range. Unit Commitment Constraints. 29
30 Slide 30 ELECTRICITY MARKET OVERVIEW Economic Dispatch 30
31 Slide 31 What Is Economic Dispatch? Holds the commitment from the unit commitment fixed Determines the least expensive way to supply load in the system Determines the output of all online units to keep the system in balance Prices are determined by solving the economic dispatch. 31
32 Slide 32 Economic Dispatch Formulation Similar to unit commitment formulation The difference: No integer variables, as the unit commitment is held fixed Start-up and no-load costs are not considered, as they become constants 32
33 Slide 33 Economic Dispatch Formulation Objective Function Total Production Cost Cost + Start-up Cost + No-Load Cost System Balance Total Generation Total Load Losses = 0 Transmission Constraints The flow on each line must be below its operating limit. Resource Capacity Constraints The output of each resource must be within its operating range. Integer variables are now fixed, so they do not affect the solution. Unit Commitment Constraints Economic dispatch only dispatches resources that are already online. 33
34 Slide 34 ECONOMIC DISPATCH EXAMPLE Marginal Pricing 34
35 Slide 35 When Is a Resource Marginal? A resource is marginal when it supplies the next megawatt of generation or demand reduction to meet load or to control a transmission constraint. System conditions heavily influence where that next megawatt is needed from the supply stack. Weather Interchange Accuracy of the load forecast 35
36 Slide 36 When Is a Resource Marginal? There will always be at least one marginal resource. System energy resource There are additional marginal resources for each binding transmission constraint (i.e., n+1 rule). In most cases, there are multiple marginal resources for a given time interval. 36 The number of marginal resources in a given five-minute pricing interval depends on the number of binding transmission constraints. When the system is unconstrained, there will only be one marginal resource. This resource is setting the system energy price, which we just said is the cost of the optimal dispatch to meet load absent congestion and losses. Each binding transmission constraint means an additional marginal resource. Given that PJM typically has congestion on the system due to either local transmission constraints or coordination on market-to-market flowgates, in most cases, there are multiple marginal resources for a given pricing interval.
37 Slide 37 Economic Dispatch Example I We assume no start-up or no-load cost. Each resource is completely flexible. 37 Let s assume for this example we have three resources and they have no start-up or no-load cost. Resource A has offered at $60/MWh and is available for 300 MW. Resource B has offered at $80/MWh and has 200 MW available. Resource C offered at $100/MWh and is available for 400 MW. All units are flexible and can start immediately with no restricting parameters.
38 Slide 38 Economic Dispatch Example I 175 MW 38 If load is 175 MW, then resource A is dispatched to 175 MW to meet load. Resource A is the marginal resource and sets price at $60/MWh.
39 Slide 39 Economic Dispatch Example I 300 MW 50 MW 39 When load increases to 350 MW, Resource A is now at full output and Resource B is brought online. The marginal resource is now Resource B as it would serve the next increment of load. The LMP is now $80/MWh and all resources online receive that price.
40 Slide 40 Economic Dispatch Example I 300 MW 100 MW 40 When load increases to 400 MW, Resource B is increased and remains the marginal resource. Resource B would serve the next increment of load. The LMP remains $80/MWh and all resources online receive that price.
41 Slide 41 Economic Dispatch Example I 300 MW 200 MW 50 MW 41 When load increases to 550 MW both Resource A and Resource B are at maximum output. Resource C is providing the last 50 MW and is marginal. LMP is set to $100/MWh and all resources receive that price.
42 Slide 42 LMP increases and load increases 42 At each level of MW of load needed, this shows that as load grows, LMP increases.
43 Slide 43 Economic Dispatch Example II What happens if we introduce inflexibility to the resources? Minimum output the resource can produce when online 200 MW 100 MW 100 MW 43 These are the same resources, but now they have minimum output levels that they cannot go below: P and J have to be on at a minimum of 100 MW. If M is called on, it must be on at a minimum of 200 MW.
44 Slide 44 Economic Dispatch Example II 200 MW 175 MW 100 MW 44 At 175 MW, A is marginal and sets the price at $60/MWh.
45 Slide 45 Economic Dispatch Example II 250 MW 200 MW 100 MW 45 At 350 MW, Resource B must be called on, but at the minimum of 100 MW. So we must back down Resource A to 250 MW. The marginal resource is A, and the price is set at $60/MWh. At this LMP, Resource B is operating at a loss and must be made whole through uplift.
46 Slide 46 Economic Dispatch Example II 300 MW 200 MW 100 MW 46 At 400 MW, Now Resource A is at maximum output at 300MW and Resource B has met the minimum output at 100MW. Resource B would serve the next increment of load and is the marginal resource. LMP is set at $80/MWh and both Resource A and Resource B receive that price.
47 Slide 47 Economic Dispatch Example II 250 MW 200 MW 100 MW 47 At 550 MW, A and B together can only get to 500 MW, so C must be called on and has a minimum of 200 MW. So both P and J are backed down, and the marginal resource is A, resulting in a $60 LMP. All resources receive $60/MWh and both B and C must receive make whole payments to cover their costs.
48 Slide 48 $/MWh $120 Price Formation Curve $110 $100 $90 Completely flexible $80 $70 $60 $50 Parameter restrictions $ Provided for informational purposes only 48 MW of Load
49 Slide 49 $/MWh $120 Price Formation Curve Using Resources A, B & C Production Cost ($) $120,000 $110 $100 Resource Dispatch A B C $100,000 $90 $80,000 $80 $70 $60 $50 LMP Production Cost Available Dispatched Marginal Resource $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $40 $ Provided for informational purposes only 49 MW of Load When load is less than 300 MW, Resource A is online and marginal. The increasing production cost is resource A producing more MW at $60/MWh. LMP is $60/MWh.
50 Slide 50 $/MWh $120 Price Formation Curve Using Resources A, B & C Production Cost ($) $120,000 $110 $100 $90 Resource Dispatch A B C $100,000 $80,000 $80 $60,000 $70 $60 $50 LMP Production Cost Available Dispatched Marginal Resource $40,000 $20,000 $40 $ MW of 50 Load When load is between 300 MW and 400 MW Both Resource A and B are online. We see a jump in production cost because Resource B is on at min. Resource A is still marginal. Even though production costs increase, LMP does not change and remains at $60/MWh.
51 Slide 51 $/MWh $120 Price Formation Curve Using Resources A, B & C Production Cost ($) $120,000 $110 $100 Resource Dispatch A B C $100,000 $90 $80,000 $80 $60,000 $70 $60 $50 LMP Production Cost Available Dispatched Marginal Resource $40,000 $20,000 $40 $ MW of Load Between 400 MW and 500 MW of load, both Resources A and B remain on, but once Resource A is at maximum, Resource B becomes marginal. LMP increases to $80/MWh.
52 Slide 52 $/MWh $120 Price Formation Curve Using Resources A, B & C Production Cost ($) $120,000 $110 $100 Resource Dispatch A B C $100,000 $90 $80,000 $80 $60,000 $70 $60 $50 LMP Production Cost Available Dispatched Marginal Resource $40,000 $20,000 $40 $ MW of Load When load is between 500 MW and 600 MW Resources A, B and C are all on. Resource A is marginal as it needed to be backed down to accommodate Resource B and C minimum output. Production costs jump as Resource C comes online. LMP drops to $60/MWh. Resource B and Resource C will need out-of-market payments
53 Slide 53 $/MWh $120 $110 $100 $90 Price Formation Curve Using Resources A, B & C Resource Dispatch A B C Production Cost ($) $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $80 $70 $60 $50 LMP Production Cost Available Dispatched Marginal Resource $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $40 $ MW of Load 53 When load is between 600 MW and 700 MW, all three resources remain online. Resource A is at max. Resource B is marginal. Resource C is at min. LMP increases to $80/MWh but does not cover the cost of Resource C operating at minimum output. Resource C will need out-of-market payments to cover the cost of operation.
54 Slide 54 $/MWh $120 $110 $100 $90 $80 $70 $60 $50 Price Formation Curve Using Resources A, B & C Resource Dispatch LMP Production Cost Available Dispatched Marginal Resource A B C Production Cost ($) $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $40 $ MW of Load When load is greater than 700 MW, Resources A and B are at maximum. Resource C is marginal and setting LMP at $100/MWh.
55 Slide 55 FAST-START PRICING 55
56 Slide 56 Session Objectives Review motivation for the FERC fast-start pricing Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NOPR) Review PJM s current special-pricing treatment Review other ISO/RTO special-pricing treatments for faststart resources 56
57 Slide 57 What Is a Fast-Start Resource? Fast-start resources can start up quickly and typically have shorter minimum run times than other resources. Definitions of fast-start resources vary across ISOs/RTOs 57
58 Slide 58 History of the FERC Fast-Start NOPR Context: Operating characteristics of fast-start resources prevent them from setting price. Requested Action: In 2016, the FERC asked RTOs/ISOs to improve price formation by: Enabling fast-start resources to set price more often Motivation Fast-start pricing can improve performance incentives for all resources during tight system conditions. Reflecting the cost of fast-start deployment through transparent price signals 58
59 Slide 59 PJM Combustion Turbine Special-Pricing Treatment Combustion turbines are usually offered as inflexible (i.e., block-loaded, where economic minimum = economic maximum). This means they cannot set price naturally For block-loaded combustion turbines that are eligible to set price, relax their economic minimum by a specific factor (currently 0.8) The wider the relaxed dispatchable range, the better chance a resource has to set price. But with a wider dispatchable range, the dispatch solution may be far below its economic minimum. 59
60 Slide 60 History of PJM Combustion Turbine Special-Pricing Treatment Special-pricing treatment was implemented over 12 years ago to allow block-loaded combustion turbine resources to set price. Relaxation factor was set to 0.9 until last year, when it was decreased to
61 Slide 61 PJM Block-Loaded Combustion Turbines As of October 2017 Approximately 180 combustion turbines offered into the Day-Ahead and Real-Time Markets as block-loaded Represents approximately 10,000 MW of capacity (based on economic maximums) 61
62 Slide 62 Shortcomings of Current Methodology Combustion turbines are generally unable to set price even though they are committed and dispatched economically. Relaxing economic minimum values in the dispatch solution distorts the system energy balance and can lead to inefficient system dispatch. Distortions must be managed by regulation at potentially higher cost than a balanced energy dispatch. 62
63 Slide 63 How Do Other ISOs/RTOs Treat Fast-Start Resources? Each ISO/RTO considers start-up and no-load costs in its commitment process for fast-start resources. However, treatment of fast-start resource start-up and no-load costs varies among ISOs/RTOs in the dispatch and pricing processes. 63
64 Slide 64 CAISO Fast-Start Resources Special pricing treatment for committed Constrained Output Generators Resource must elect constrained output generator status (currently, this option is rarely used) For a committed constrained output generator: Day-Ahead Market: Economic minimum is relaxed to 0 in the dispatch and pricing processes. Real-Time Market: Economic minimum is relaxed to 0 only in the pricing process. 64 Special pricing treatment: Resource with an operating range no greater than the higher of 3 MW or 5% of its economic maximum that registers, on an annual basis, its economic minimum as economic maximum less 0.01 MW ([economic minimum = economic maximum] 0.01 MW)
65 Slide 65 CAISO Fast-Start Resources Committed constrained output generator s submitted energy offer is replaced by a calculated energy bid: For dispatch range between 0 and economic minimum: Calculated energy bid = minimum load cost/economic minimum For the 0.01 MW between economic minimum and economic maximum: Calculated energy bid = max{submitted bid price, minimum load cost/economic minimum} 65
66 Slide 66 ISO New England Fast-Start Resources Special pricing treatment for fast-start resources in real time Resources with start-up times that do not exceed 30 minutes Separate dispatch and pricing runs Dispatch run: no changes are made to resource offers. Pricing run: fast-start resource economic minimums are relaxed to 0. Start-up costs are amortized over economic maximum and minimum run time and added into energy offers. No-load costs are amortized over economic maximum and added into energy offers for all online hours. Lost opportunity cost paid when dispatch signals are not profit maximizing 66
67 Slide 67 MISO Fast-Start Resources Special pricing treatment for one-hour fast-start resources Separate runs for dispatch and pricing: Committed one-hour resources are qualified for special pricing treatment. Not-committed one-hour resources: If they can relieve transmission, energy or reserve constraint violations, qualified for special pricing treatment Otherwise, not qualified (output fixed at 0 MW in pricing) Slow-start resources not qualified for special pricing treatment 67
68 Slide 68 MISO Fast-Start Resources In pricing run, qualified one-hour fast-start resources are allowed to be partially committed (integer relaxation). Economic minimums are relaxed to 0 MW. Commitment costs are amortized over economic maximum and added to energy offers for both qualified committed and not-committed resources. 68
69 Slide 69 NYISO Fast-Start Resources Special pricing treatment for block-loaded resources (mostly gas-turbines) Separate runs for dispatch and pricing 69
70 Slide 70 NYISO Fast-Start Resources Dispatch run: Determines dispatch signals sent to resources Committed block-loaded resources output fixed at economic maximum Not-committed (offline) resources: 10-minute resources with capacity less than or equal to 80 MW economic minimum relaxed to 0 MW All other resources output fixed at 0 MW 70
71 Slide 71 NYISO Fast-Start Resources Pricing run determines energy and reserve prices Committed block-loaded resources: Economic minimums are relaxed to zero may set price. Commitment costs (start-up and no-load) are not considered. Not-committed 10-min. resources with capacity not exceeding 80 MW are qualified for price setting. Economic minimums are relaxed to zero may set price. Commitment costs are amortized over economic maximum and added into energy offers. 71
72 Slide 72 ISO/RTO Fast-Start Pricing Summary PJM CAISO ISO-NE MISO NYISO Separate Pricing and Dispatch Runs Economic Minimum Relaxation Includes Start-up and No-Load Costs 72
73 Slide 73 APPENDIX Duality 73
74 Slide 74 Economic Dispatch Solution As a result of solving the economic dispatch, the dispatch algorithm determines desired dispatch points for every dispatchable generator. The desired dispatch points are called primal variables. To calculate the prices, the dual is formulated. The prices are obtained by solving for the dual variables (shadow prices). 74
75 Slide 75 What Is Duality Theory? For any linear program (LP), a dual can be formulated using a defined set of rules. Let represent our primal variables and our dual variables. Each constraint in the primal has a corresponding dual variable (shadow price). Each shadow price reflects the effect of relaxing the corresponding constraint by one unit on the value of the objective function (change in total production cost). 75
76 Slide 76 Duality Theory Primal (Dispatch) : : Dual (Pricing) Dual Variables For example, the dual variable reflects the change in the primal objective function value from relaxing (increasing) by one unit. 76
77 Slide 77 Calculate Desired Dispatch Points Duality Theory for Separate Pricing and Dispatch Runs Primal Dispatch Relax Unit Commitment Integer Variables Primal Pricing : : Dual Dispatch : : Dual Pricing Calculate Prices 77
78 Slide 78 Economic Dispatch Formulation Objective Function Total Cost is the incremental cost is the start-up cost is the no-load cost of resource. Transmission Constraints k 2 K System Balance s.t. Integer Variables are now fixed, so will not impact the solution. Resource Capacity Constraints 2 N Unit Commitment Constraints 2 Economic dispatch only includes online resources. 78
79 Slide 79 Economic Dispatch Solution and Duality The shadow price of the system balance constraint is one for the whole system (only one system balance equation). Each transmission constraint has its own shadow price. Some constraints may be binding. A binding constraint is a constraint that turns into an equality at the optimal solution. For example, a particular line has to be operated at its limit. 79
80 Slide 80 Economic Dispatch Solution and Duality (cont.) The shadow price of a binding constraint is non-zero, while the shadow price of a constraint that does not bind is zero. The system balance constraint always binds, so its shadow price is never zero. This means that there is always a price to support system balance. If there are no binding transmission constraints, there is no congestion in the system. 80
81 Slide 81 Binding Constraint Example Let the flow on line 1,, be 5 MW at the optimal solution, and let line 1 have a limit,, of 10 MW: Increasing the limit of by 1 MW will not change the optimal solution Shadow price ( ) of the line 1 flow constraint will be 0 If the flow on line 1,, is 10 MW at the optimal solution, then increasing the limit by 1 MW will allow an additional MW to flow across the line further reducing total system costs Shadow price ( of the line 1 flow constraint will be non-zero 81
FERC Docket EL Fast-Start Resources
FERC Docket EL18-34-000 Fast-Start Resources Anthony Giacomoni December 18, 2018 PJM 2017 Session Objectives Review motivation for the FERC Order regarding faststart resources Review PJM s current special-pricing
More informationLMP Calculation and Uplift
LMP Calculation and Uplift Anthony Giacomoni January 29, 2018 PJM 2017 Session Objectives Review fundamentals of locational marginal pricing (LMP) and uplift Review simple locational marginal pricing and
More informationPrice Formation Education 4: Shortage Pricing and Operating Reserve Demand Curve
Price Formation Education 4: Shortage Pricing and Operating Reserve Demand Curve Patricio Rocha Garrido Lisa Morelli Laura Walter Disclaimer This is not a committee meeting. This session is for educational
More informationReal-Time LMP and Impacts on Uplift
Real-Time LMP and Impacts on Uplift Rebecca Carroll Manager, Knowledge Management Center MIC Special Session: Price Transparency February 24, 2017 Locational Marginal Price System Energy Price Transmission
More informationPrice Formation in Energy and Ancillary Services Markets Operated by Regional Transmission Organizations and Independent System Operators
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Price Formation in Energy and Ancillary Services Markets Operated by Regional Transmission Organizations and Independent System
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. California Independent System ) Docket No. RM Operator Corporation )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION California Independent System ) Docket No. RM17-3-000 Operator Corporation ) COMMENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MARKET MONITORING FOR
More informationMarkets Report. Jennifer Warner-Freeman Senior Economist, Market Analysis January 22, PJM 2018
Markets Report Jennifer Warner-Freeman Senior Economist, Market Analysis January 22, 2018 www.pjm.com Executive Summary PJM Wholesale Cost for 2017 was $49.64/MWh, up from full-year 2016 costs of $47.49/MWh.
More informationSingle Schedule Market Pricing Issues
Single Schedule Market Pricing Issues Presented by Scott Harvey and Susan Pope Phase 1 - Session 3 Module G: Market Power Mitigation June 29, 2017 Toronto, Ontario TOPICS June 2: Module A: Energy Pricing
More informationPrice Formation Education 3: Reserves and Co-optimization
Price Formation Education 3: Reserves and Co-optimization Anthony Giacomoni Keyur Patel Cheryl Mae Velasco Disclaimer This is not a committee meeting. This session is for educational purposes only, to
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION California Independent System ) Docket Nos. ER12-1630 Operator Corporation ) ER14-971 Informational Report of the California Independent System
More informationPrice Formation. Eric Ciccoretti Attorney-Advisor Office of Energy Policy and Innovation Federal Energy Regulatory Commission June 13, 2017
Price Formation Eric Ciccoretti Attorney-Advisor Office of Energy Policy and Innovation Federal Energy Regulatory Commission June 13, 2017 The views and opinions presented are mine alone and do not reflect
More informationTechnical Bulletin Comparison of Lossy versus Lossless Shift Factors in the ISO Market Optimizations
Technical Bulletin 2009-06-03 Comparison of Lossy versus Lossless Shift Factors in the ISO Market Optimizations June 15, 2009 Comparison of Lossy versus Lossless Shift Factors in the ISO Market Optimizations
More informationLocational Marginal Pricing (LMP): Basics of Nodal Price Calculation
MRTU Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP): Basics of Nodal Price Calculation CRR Educational Class #2 CAISO Market Operations Why are LMPs important to the CRR Allocation & Settlement Process The CRR revenue
More informationUpdated Operating Parameter Definitions
Updated Operating Parameter Definitions Tom Hauske Senior Lead Engineer, Performance Compliance Market Implementation Committee February 10, 2016 Why are we discussing? A number of operating parameters
More informationRTO Overview and Day 2 Markets. EAI Technical Conference May 26, 2011
RTO Overview and Day 2 Markets EAI Technical Conference May 26, 2011 1 Agenda RTO Day 2 markets and Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) Why RTO Day 2 markets may benefit Entergy s customers Quantifiable
More informationMISO ELMP. Goals & Experience. Jeff Bladen Executive Director, Market Development
MISO ELMP Goals & Experience Jeff Bladen Executive Director, Market Development HARVARD ELECTRICITY POLICY GROUP EIGHTY-NINTH PLENARY SESSION JANUARY 25-26, 2018 1 MISO saw gaps with legacy LMP market
More informationDispatch Signal & Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP)
Dispatch Signal & Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) PJM State & Member Training Dept. PJM 2017 Objectives Students will be able to: Identify how PJM dispatches & utilizes LMP PJM 2017 2 Dispatch Rate Definition:
More informationPJM Wholesale Markets. Hisham Choueiki, Ph.D., P.E. Ohio PUC Staff October 20-24, 2014 Tbilisi, Georgia
PJM Wholesale Markets Hisham Choueiki, Ph.D., P.E. Ohio PUC Staff October 20-24, 2014 Tbilisi, Georgia PJM RTO Functions Grid Operation Non-discriminatory treatment Monitoring transmission system Reliability
More informationDIRECT ENERGY PJM MIC. Marji Philips Tyler Little August 12, 2015
DIRECT ENERGY PJM MIC Marji Philips Marjorie.philips@directenergy.com Tyler Little Tyler.Little@directenergy.com August 12, 2015 1 Background PJM Energy Cap was put in place 18 years ago based on fuel
More informationOverview of EE394V Restructured Electricity Markets: Locational Marginal Pricing
Overview of EE394V Restructured Electricity Markets: Locational Marginal Pricing Ross Baldick Copyright 2013 Ross Baldick www.ece.utexas.edu/~baldick/classes/394v/ee394v.html 1 Outline Focus of class Challenges
More informationKey Issues and Consideration in Market Design, Operational and Oversight
Key Issues and Consideration in Market Design, Operational and Oversight Patrick Donlon Amanda Gordon Kathryn Sophy Kenneth Villwock Public Utilities Commission of Ohio & Pennsylvania Public Utilities
More informationStepped Constraint Parameters. Issue Paper
Stepped Constraint Parameters May 5, 2016 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Plan for Stakeholder Engagement... 4 3. Transmission constraint relaxation parameter... 5 4. Shift factor effectiveness
More informationManaging Flexibility in MISO Markets
Managing Flexibility in MISO Markets Clean Energy Regulatory Forum November 9, 2012 Outline Impacts of Variable Generation on Ancillary Services Dispatchable Intermittent Resources Introduction to Proposed
More informationMarkets Report. Jennifer Warner-Freeman Senior Economist, Market Analysis March 19, PJM 2018
Markets Report Jennifer Warner-Freeman Senior Economist, Market Analysis March 19, 2018 www.pjm.com Executive Summary PJM Wholesale Cost through February 2018 was $77.41/MWh, up from full-year 2017 costs
More informationREVENUE SUFFICIENCY GUARANTEES AND COST ALLOCATION William W. Hogan i May 25, 2006
REVENUE SUFFICIENCY GUARANTEES AND COST ALLOCATION William W. Hogan i May 25, 2006 Introduction These comments address the Revenue Sufficiency Guarantee (RSG) and associated cost allocation issues discussed
More informationRenewables and electricity market design
Peter Cramton University of Cologne and University of Maryland 11 May 2018 Renewables and electricity market design 1 Goal of electricity markets: Reliable electricity at least cost Short-run efficiency
More informationFuel Cost Policy FAQs. PJM P age. Last Updated: 10/19/2017
Fuel Cost Policy FAQs Note: Given FERC s recent approval of PJM s hourly offers filing in Docket No. ER16-372-002, PJM is requesting that all Market Sellers review and update their start-up and energy
More informationTransmission Constraint Relaxation Parameter Revision ISO Straw Proposal
Transmission Constraint Relaxation Parameter Revision ISO Straw Proposal October 18, 2012 Prepared by: Market and Infrastructure Development Version: 1.0 California Independent System Operator Contents
More informationMISO-PJM Interface Pricing Post Implementation Metrics and Criteria
MISO-PJM Interface Pricing Post Implementation Metrics and Criteria Contents 1 Introduction... 2 2 Real-Time Market Interchange Price Signal Effectiveness Metrics... 2 2.1 Post Implementation Pricing Monitoring
More informationDay-Ahead Energy Market
Day-Ahead Energy Market PJM State & Member Training Dept. PJM 2017 Objectives Students will be able to: Identify the process and procedures for participating in the Day-Ahead Market PJM 2017 2 Markets
More informationEnergy Uplift (Operating Reserves)
Section 4 Energy Uplift Energy Uplift (Operating Reserves) Energy uplift is paid to market participants under specified conditions in order to ensure that resources are not required to operate for the
More informationStandard Market Design in the Electric Market: Some Cautionary Thoughts. June 20, Prepared by: Philip Hanser Metin Celebi Peter Fox-Penner
Standard Market Design in the Electric Market: Some Cautionary Thoughts June 20, 2002 Prepared by: Philip Hanser Metin Celebi Peter Fox-Penner 1 Introduction The standard market design about to be proposed
More informationAnalysis of the Broader Regional Markets Initiatives
Analysis of the Broader Regional Markets Initiatives Presented to: Joint NYISO-IESO-MISO-PJM Stakeholder Technical Conference on Broader Regional Markets David B. Patton, Ph.D. Potomac Economics September
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Electric Storage Participation in ) Markets Operated by Regional ) Docket Nos. RM16-23; AD16-20 Transmission Organizations and )
More informationOverview of EE394V Restructured Electricity Markets: Locational Marginal Pricing
Overview of EE394V Restructured Electricity Markets: Locational Marginal Pricing Ross Baldick Copyright 2014 Ross Baldick www.ece.utexas.edu/~baldick/classes/394v/ee394v.html 1 Outline Focus of class Challenges
More informationLocational Marginal Pricing II: Unlocking the Mystery
Locational Marginal Pricing II: Unlocking the Mystery Thomas D. Veselka Argonne National Laboratory Decision and Information Sciences Division Center for Energy, Environmental, and Economic Systems Analysis
More information2. Market Operations Overview
2. Market Operations Overview 2.5 Market Information This section summarizes and describes the common information that is used by the Day-Ahead and Real-Time processes. 2.5.1 Resource Static Data Static
More informationBetter Markets, Better Products, Better Prices
OCTOBER 2, 2014 CAMBRIDGE, MA Better Markets, Better Products, Better Prices Improving Real Time Price Signals in the New England Power Market Bob Ethier VICE PRESIDENT, MARKET OPERATIONS New Challenges
More informationDesign Considerations for an Alberta Capacity Market
Design Considerations for an Alberta Capacity Market Monitoring Analytics September 21, 2016 Monitoring Analytics 2016 www.monitoringanalytics.com This page intentionally left blank. Monitoring Analytics
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Offer Caps in Markets Operated by ) Docket No. RM16-5-000 Regional Transmission Organizations ) and Independent System Operators
More information2015 ISO/RTO Metrics Report. Summary. November 2015
2015 ISO/RTO Metrics Report Summary November 2015 ISO/RTO Metrics Report Background Independent system operators (ISOs) and regional transmission organizations (RTOs) that are regulated by the Federal
More informationPrice Formation. PJM Market Participants February 14, Joe Bowring Catherine Tyler
Price Formation PJM Market Participants February 14, 2019 Joe Bowring Catherine Tyler ISSUES WITH PJM ORDC 2019 www.monitoringanalytics.com 2 PJM ORDC Shape PJM s ORDCs persistently raise prices and procure
More informationFuture Market Implementation
SPP.org 1 Future Market Implementation Requirements - way forward MWG June 29 th, 2009 SPP.org WebEx Instructions Please submit questions to host. If it is a long question you can type a summary until
More informationFERC NOPR on Fast Start Pricing. Market Subcommittee January 12, 2017
FERC NOPR on Fast Start Pricing Market Subcommittee January 12, 2017 Overview Purpose Summarize FERC NOPR on Fast Start Pricing * Compare the proposed rules with ELMP Key Takeaways Five rules are proposed:
More information2016 ANNUAL VRL ANALYSIS
2016 ANNUAL VRL ANALYSIS Published on 08/01/2016 By Ops Market Support/Forensics Chris Davis Ricky Finkbeiner REVISION HISTORY DATE OR VERSION NUMBER AUTHOR CHANGE DESCRIPTION COMMENTS 7/11/2016 Ricky
More informationPJM Manual 15: Cost Development Guidelines Revision: 30 Effective Date: December 4, Prepared by Cost Development Subcommittee
PJM Manual 15: Cost Development Guidelines Revision: 30 Effective Date: December 4, 2018 Prepared by Cost Development Subcommittee PJM 2018 Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Exhibits...8 Approval...10
More informationCapacity Performance Proposal. Summary of Key Design Elements
December 3, 2014 This page is intentionally left blank. PJM 2014 1 P a g e Capacity Product Synopsis PJM Interconnection is proposing a single capacity product called Capacity Performance, similar to the
More informationCommitted Offer: Offer on which a resource was scheduled by the Office of the Interconnection for a particular clock hour for the Operating Day.
Proposed Tariff Revisions Attachment K-Appendix and Schedule 1 of the Operating Agreement Generator Offer Flexibility Senior Task Force Revisions Related To Make-Whole and Lost Opportunity Cost Payments
More informationThree Pivotal Supplier Test: Theory and Application
Three Pivotal Supplier Test: Theory and Application TPSTF Wilmington, DE Howard J. Haas Paul Scheidecker PJM MMU August 20, 2007 www.pjm.com 2006 Settlement Agreement in 114 FERC 61,076 (2006). Overall
More informationDispatch Signal & Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP)
Dispatch Signal & Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) PJM State & Member Training Dept. Objectives Students will be able to: Identify how PJM dispatches & utilizes LMP Dispatch Rate Economic control signal
More informationPJM Markets. Energy and Ancillary Services. PJM State & Member Training Dept. PJM /29/2014
PJM Markets Energy and Ancillary Services PJM State & Member Training Dept. LMP Basics 2 7/17/2013 What is LMP? Locational Marginal Price Pricing method PJM uses to: price energy purchases and sales in
More informationBEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Offer Caps in Markets Operated by ) Regional Transmission Organizations and ) Docket No. RM16-5-000 Independent System Operators ) COMMENTS OF THE PENNSYLVANIA
More informationPJM s Implementation of the Three-Pivotal Supplier Test
PJM s Implementation of the Three-Pivotal Supplier Test MIC July 25, 2007 Joe Bowring Paul Scheidecker Market Monitoring Unit www.pjm.com Context of TPS Test Results TPS test is triggered in real time
More informationOperating Reserve Demand Curve Education
Operating Reserve Demand Curve Education Rebecca Stadelmeyer Adam Keech Market Implementation Committee August 10, 2016 Agenda History Education Concerns 2 History 3 Shortage History FERC issued Order
More informationSummary of 2016 MISO State of the Market Report
Summary of 2016 MISO State of the Market Report Presented to: MISO Board Markets Committee David B. Patton, Ph.D. MISO Independent Market Monitor July 20, 2017 Introduction As the Independent Market Monitor
More informationEnergy Uplift (Operating Reserves)
Section 4 Energy Uplift Energy Uplift (Operating Reserves) Energy uplift is paid to market participants under specified conditions in order to ensure that resources are not required to operate for the
More informationTwo Settlement PJM /06/2016
Two Settlement PJM 2016 Objectives Describe Two-Settlement process Day-Ahead Market Balancing Market Explain Virtual Transactions and their settlement Inc Offers Dec Bids Up-to Congestion Transactions
More informationCongestion and Marginal Losses
Section 10 Congestion and Marginal Losses Congestion and Marginal Losses The Locational Marginal Price (LMP) is the incremental price of energy at a bus. The LMP at any bus is made up of three components:
More informationProposed Enhancements to Energy Price Formation
Proposed Enhancements to Energy Price Formation PJM Interconnection November 15, 2017 Note: On May 4, 2018, minor wording changes were made and a footnote was added to Appendix D, pages 48 and 50. PJM
More informationMarkets Report. Paul M. Sotkiewicz, Ph.D Chief Economist, Markets MC Webinar March 23, 2015 PJM 2015
Markets Report Paul M. Sotkiewicz, Ph.D Chief Economist, Markets MC Webinar March 23, 2015 Executive Summary PJM Wholesale Cost for the first two months of 2015 was $71.04/MWh, up from $54.29 in January.
More informationPJM s Implementation of the Three-Pivotal Supplier Test Update
PJM s Implementation of the Three-Pivotal Supplier Test Update TPSTF August 20, 2007 Joe Bowring Paul Scheidecker Market Monitoring Unit www.pjm.com Context of TPS Test Results TPS test is triggered in
More informationMarket Design Concepts to Prepare for Significant Renewable Generation
Market Design Concepts to Prepare for Significant Renewable Generation Flexible Ramping Product Ethan D. Avallone SENIOR MARKET DESIGN SPECIALIST ENERGY MARKET DESIGN Market Issues Working Group April
More informationPower Markets and Renewables Deployment in Developing Countries
Power Markets and Renewables Deployment in Developing Countries Goran Strbac Imperial College London g.strbac@imperial.ac.uk and Frank A. Wolak Stanford University wolak@zia.stanford.edu Outline of Presentation
More informationGas Prices and Offer Price Flexibility in Other ISO/RTO Markets
Gas Prices and Offer Price Flexibility in Other ISO/RTO Markets Scott Harvey Member: California Market Surveillance Committee Folsom, California May 19, 2014 TOPICS ISO New England PJM MISO New York ISO
More informationNEW YORK INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR
Rate Schedule 1 Study Status Update Review of Other ISO/RTO s March 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 RATE STRUCTURES AT OTHER ISO S/RTO S...1 1.1 PJM...1 1.2 ISO-New England...3 1.3 California ISO...6 1.4 Midwest
More informationOpinion on Reserve Scarcity Pricing Design
Opinion on Reserve Scarcity Pricing Design by Frank A. Wolak, Chairman James Bushnell, Member Benjamin F. Hobbs, Member Market Surveillance Committee of the California ISO November 26, 2009 Executive Summary
More informationISO/RTO Metrics Initiative
ISO/RTO Metrics Initiative Mary McGarvey Vice President & Chief Financial Officer New York Independent System Operator Management Committee NYISO Krey Corporate Center January 20, 2010 Government Accountability
More informationREAL-TIME SCHEDULING PRIMER
REAL-TIME SCHEDULING PRIMER Introduction System Market Design 2 (SMD2) is name given to a New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) program that replaces the NYISO s legacy control and computing platforms
More informationU. S. SPOT MARKET REGULATION
U. S. SPOT MARKET REGULATION NARUC ENERGY REGULATORY PARTNERSHIP WITH GEORGIAN NATIONAL ENERGY AND WATER SUPPLY REGULATORY COMMISSION & MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION TBILISI, GEORGIA November 30,
More informationREVENUE SUFFICIENCY GUARANTEES, COST CAUSATION, AND COST ALLOCATION William W. Hogan i October 9, 2008
REVENUE SUFFICIENCY GUARANTEES, COST CAUSATION, AND COST ALLOCATION William W. Hogan i October 9, 2008 Introduction These comments supplement my earlier submission regarding the Revenue Sufficiency Guarantee
More informationRevenues from Ancillary Services and the Value of Operational Flexibility
Revenues from Ancillary Services and the Value of Operational Flexibility October 31, 2002 LCG Consulting The Issue Research Highlights In a restructured electricity industry, markets govern the operation
More informationPJM Manual 15: Cost Development Guidelines Revision: 2930 Effective Date: May 15, 2017April 9, Prepared by Cost Development Subcommittee
PJM Manual 15: Cost Development Guidelines Revision: 2930 Effective Date: May 15, 2017April 9, 2018 Prepared by Cost Development Subcommittee PJM 20172018 Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Exhibits...8
More informationMidwest ISO TDU Sector October 2010 Midwest ISO Advisory Committee Hot Topic Adequate Price Signals
Midwest ISO TDU Sector October 2010 Midwest ISO Advisory Committee Hot Topic Adequate Price Signals October 13, 2010 The Municipal, Cooperative and Transmission Dependent Utilities (TDUs) welcome the opportunity
More informationCalifornia Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff
Table of Contents 8. Ancillary Services... 3 8.1 Scope... 3 8.2 Ancillary Services Standards... 4 8.2.1 Determination of Ancillary Service Standards... 4 8.2.2 Time-Frame for Revising Ancillary Service
More informationRenewable Integration: Market & Product Review Phase 1
Renewable Integration: Market & Product Review Phase 1 Margaret Miller Manager, Market Design & Regulatory Policy Gillian Biedler Senior Market Design & Policy Specialist Cindy Hinman Senior Market Design
More informationPJM Manual 15: Cost Development Guidelines Revision: 2930 Effective Date: May 15, 2017July 31, Prepared by Cost Development Subcommittee
PJM Manual 15: Cost Development Guidelines Revision: 2930 Effective Date: May 15, 2017July 31, 2018 Prepared by Cost Development Subcommittee PJM 20172018 Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Exhibits...8
More informationAnalysis of the 2020/2021 RPM Base Residual Auction
Analysis of the 2020/2021 RPM Base Residual Auction The Independent Market Monitor for PJM November 17, 2017 Monitoring Analytics 2017 www.monitoringanalytics.com Introduction This report, prepared by
More informationGas-Electric Coordination in PJM: Trends, Issues, Interactions, and Looking Ahead
Gas-Electric Coordination in PJM: Trends, Issues, Interactions, and Looking Ahead Harvard Electricity Policy Group 68 th Plenary Session Paul M. Sotkiewicz, Ph.D. Chief Economist PJM Interconnection October
More informationThe Evolution of the PJM Market in the United States: Looking Back to Look Forward
The Evolution of the PJM Market in the United States: Looking Back to Look Forward Feasibility Study for ASEAN Multilateral Power Trade September 5-6, 2018 Jakarta, Indonesia Craig Glazer Vice President
More informationEnergy & Reserve Pricing Solution Overview PJM 2014
Energy & Reserve Pricing Solution Overview 1 Energy and Reserve Pricing Solution The proposed Energy and Reserve Pricing Solution is comprised of three parts Day Ahead resource commitment changes Day Ahead
More informationCalifornia ISO. Discussion & Scoping Paper on Renewable Integration Phase 2. Renewable Integration: Market and Product Review Phase 2
Discussion & Scoping Paper on Renewable Integration Phase 2 Phase 2 April 5, 2010 Issue Paper - Phase 2 Renewable Integration Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 3 2 Candidate Elements for the Comprehensive
More informationINDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATORS (VI + Access Rules vs. ISO vs. ITSO)
INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATORS (VI + Access Rules vs. ISO vs. ITSO) Paul L. Joskow September 28, 2007 ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM OPERATOR MODELS System operator (SO) is vertically integrated utility (G+T) Functional
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF SOUTHWEST POWER POOL, INC.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Fast-Start Pricing in Markets Operated by Regional Transmission Organizations and Independent System Operators Docket No. RM17-3-000
More informationSection 3 Characteristics of Credits Types of units. Economic Noneconomic Generation.
Section 3 Operating Reserve Operating Reserve Day-ahead and real-time operating reserve credits are paid to market participants under specified conditions in order to ensure that resources are not required
More informationPJM Organization and Markets. Saudi Delegation Columbus Ohio May 22, 2012
PJM Organization and Markets Saudi Delegation Columbus Ohio May 22, 2012 Agenda Introduction & Governance Energy Markets LMP FTRs/ARRs Two Settlement Virtual Bids Ancillary Capacity - Reliability Pricing
More informationCourse notes for EE394V Restructured Electricity Markets: Market Power
Course notes for EE394V Restructured Electricity Markets: Market Power Ross Baldick Copyright c 2009 Ross Baldick Title Page 1 of 54 Go Back Full Screen Close Quit 1 Background This review of background
More informationLoad Participation in SCED v1 Overview & Refresher
Load Participation in SCED v1 Overview & Refresher ERCOT Staff Loads in SCED v1 Three-legged stool: NPRR 555 Load Resource Participation in SCED NPRR 532 Load Resource Participation in Non-spin Other Binding
More information3.2 Market Settlements.
3.2 Market Settlements. If a dollar-per-mw-hour value is applied in a calculation under this section 3.2 where the interval of the value produced in that calculation is less than an hour, then for purposes
More informationOverview of PJM: Looking Back to Look Forward Tokyo Power Market Summit
Overview of PJM: Looking Back to Look Forward Tokyo Power Market Summit Craig Glazer Vice President, Federal Government Policy PJM Interconnection June, 2018 Topics 1. PJM Overview 2. Evolution of PJM
More informationISO Net Surplus Collection & Allocation in Wholesale Power Markets under LMP
ISO Net Surplus Collection & Allocation in Wholesale Power Markets under LMP Presenter: Leigh Tesfatsion Professor of Econ, Math, and Electrical and Comp. Engineering Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
More information2007 State of the Market Report Midwest ISO. Midwest ISO
2007 State of the Market Report Midwest ISO Prepared by: Midwest ISO Independent Market Monitor David B. Patton, Ph.D. Potomac Economics June 2008 Executive Summary: Introduction As the Independent Market
More information3.2 Market Buyers Spot Market Energy Charges.
3.2 Market Buyers. 3.2.1 Spot Market Energy Charges. (a) The Office of the Interconnection shall calculate System Energy Prices in the form of Day-ahead System Energy Prices and Real-time System Energy
More informationEIM Greenhouse Gas Enhancement. Draft Final Proposal
EIM Greenhouse Gas Enhancement Draft Final Proposal May 24, 2017 EIM Greenhouse Gas Enhancement Draft Final Proposal Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 3 2 Stakeholder Process and Timeline... 4 3 Changes
More informationPricing Enhancements Revised Straw Proposal
Pricing Enhancements Revised Straw Proposal Guillermo Bautista Alderete, Ph.D. Manager, Market Validation and Quality Analysis October 3, 2014 ISO Stakeholder Initiative Process POLICY AND PLAN DEVELOPMENT
More informationVariable Operations and Maintenance (VOM) Costs: Educational Document
Variable Operation & Maintenance Costs - Where we are today Manual 15 does not specifically define Variable Operation & Maintenance (VOM) Costs, nor do any other PJM manuals. In a Review of Generator Compensation
More informationUTC Activity Pre and Post 162 FERC 61,139: January 1, 2017 through March 8, 2018
UTC Activity Pre and Post 162 FERC 61,139: January 1, 2017 through March 8, 2018 The Independent Market Monitor for PJM April 3, 2018 Monitoring Analytics 2018 www.monitoringanalytics.com This page intentionally
More informationIt s s Getting Better All the Time (with Mixed Integer Programming)
It s s Getting Better All the Time (with Mixed Integer Programming) Richard O Neill Chief Economic Advisor Federal Energy Regulation Commission richard.oneill@ferc.gov Harvard Electricity Policy Group
More informationProperties of Convex Hull Pricing. Education Session 2 December 11, 2017
Properties of Convex Hull Pricing Price Formation Education Session 2 December 11, 2017 Catherine Tyler Overview of Convex Hull Pricing Theoretical pricing model aiming to include start, no load, and minimum
More informationCalifornia Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff
Table of Contents California Independent System Operator Corporation 8. Ancillary Services... 3 8.1 Scope... 3 8.2 Ancillary Services Standards... 4 8.2.1 Determination Of Ancillary Service Standards...
More informationPeak Reliability/PJM Connext West-Wide RC and Market Services. Webinar January 16, 2018
Peak Reliability/PJM Connext West-Wide RC and Market Services Webinar January 16, 2018 Welcome and Introductions Peak Reliability (Peak) Dick Garlish Pete Hoelscher Brett Wangen PJM Connext Scott Baker
More information