Prepared for: City of Jeffersonville. November Prepared by

Similar documents
SECTION IV WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

SAW MILL RIVER DAYLIGHTING ANALYSIS AT RIVER PARK CENTER

The Beckett s Run Experience. Fort Wayne, Indiana

Beaver Brook Flood Study

APPENDIX J-3 Technical Report on Airport Drainage, Northern Sector Airport and Ordinance Creek Watershed, Airport Creek Hydrologic Models

Hydraulic Report. County Road 595 Bridge over Mulligan Creek. Prepared By AECOM Brian A. Hintsala, P.E

Engineering Report Preliminary Floodplain Study. Executive Summary

SECTION III: WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Review Budget and Timeline for XP-SWMM Phase II Project and Determine Next Steps

Hydraulic Report. County Road 595 Bridge over Dead River. Prepared By AECOM Brian A. Hintsala, P.E

Cherokee County Future Conditions Floodplain Development

KAY COUNTY, OKLAHOMA. Federal Emergency Management Agency AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Stormwater Erosion Control & Post-Construction Plans (Stormwater Quality Plans)

JACKSON COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Hydrologic Calibration:

Stormwater Management Studies PDS Engineering Services Division ES Policy # 3-01

Airport Master Plan. Floodplain Report. Prepared by: Prepared for: Illinois Department of Transportation

DAWSON COUNTY, GEORGIA

LANIER COUNTY, GEORGIA

DAVIESS COUNTY, KENTUCKY AND INCORPORATED AREAS Daviess County

Southeast Policy Area Drainage Study

Dam Failure Analysis. Olivotti Lake Dam. Houle Enterprises, LLC. (Final) Oshkosh, Wisconsin. Lincoln County, Wisconsin. Report prepared for

Chicago Waterways Tail Water Conditions Modeling

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION REPORT APPENDIX C HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS

Technical Memorandum. Hydraulic Analysis Smith House Flood Stages. 1.0 Introduction

Bridge Replacement Project. Preliminary Hydraulic Study. Lincoln, California BRLS-5089 (021) BRIDGE 19C Mcbean Park Drive at Auburn Ravine

Hey and Associates, Inc.

Pajaro River Watershed Flood Prevention Authority. Phase 3 and 4a. Pajaro River Watershed Study

TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1.0 Background Watershed Description Hydrology - HEC-HMS Models Hydraulics - HEC-RAS Models...

WALKER COUNTY, GEORGIA

Technical Memorandum No River Geometry

Floodplain Special Review

Floodplain Development

PEARCE CREEK CONFINED DISPOSAL AREA MODIFICATION

Little Bear Brook Flood Hazard Assessment and Redevelopment Area Regional Stormwater Management Analysis. Progress Meeting

LOWER SWEETWATER CREEK

IMPROVED MODELING OF THE GREAT PEE DEE RIVER: DOCUMENTATION IN SUPPORT OF FEMA APPEAL. Horry County, South Carolina

San Luis Obispo Creek Watershed Hydrologic Model Inputs

COLUMBIA COUNTY, GEORGIA

STEPHENS COUNTY, OKLAHOMA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

OCONEE COUNTY, GEORGIA

TECHNICAL GUIDANCE and CASE STUDY for INEFFECTIVE FLOW and CONVEYANCE SHADOW AREAS

Urban Study. Rocky Branch Watershed Columbia, South Carolina. June 1, Project No

Master Watershed Study Final Report Volume 1

FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY

CLAY STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT

DRAINAGE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

GORDON COUNTY, GEORGIA

A Hydrologic Study of the. Ryerson Creek Watershed

Appendix C, Attachment 4 June 11, Diversion Channel Outlet Hydraulic Modeling RAS and ADH

December 7, Dr. Christine Pomeroy University of Utah Civil and Environmental Engineering MCE Salt Lake City, UT. Dear Dr.

Development of Stage-Discharge Ratings for Site 2240 Bear Creek at Cold Spring

Modeling a Complex Hydraulic Environment Using a 1-D Approach Supplemented with Simple 2-D Principles Manas Borah Ed Dickson June 5, 2014

TIFT COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS. Tift County. Revised: September 29, 2010 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 13277CV000A

NEW CASTLE COUNTY, DELAWARE, AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Appendix VI: Illustrative example

Upper Des Plaines River Feasibility Study. Appendix A Hydrology and Hydraulics

BLACK HAWK COUNTY, IOWA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

S.R. 0944, Section 015 (Wertzville Road) Bridge over the West Branch of Simmons Creek. Silver Spring Township Cumberland County.

CARROLL COUNTY, GEORGIA

Development of a Stage-Discharge Rating for Site Van Bibber Creek at Route 93

DRAFT FOREST VIEW, ILLINOIS SECTION 205 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT APPENDIX E HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS

S.R. 4031, SECTION FVR OVER BEAVER RUN SEGMENT 0170, OFFSET 6093 EAST NANTMEAL TOWNSHIP, CHESTER CO. ENGINEERING DISTRICT 6-0

Estimating the 100-year Peak Flow for Ungagged Middle Creek Watershed in Northern California, USA

MARQUETTE COUNTY, MICHIGAN

Appendix K Civil Engineering

Stream Reaches and Hydrologic Units

Hydrology Design Report

CITY OF ANGLETON MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN PHASE I EVALUATION & PRELIMINARY REPORT

PUTNAM COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Freight Street Development Strategy

Storm Water System Improvements

Little Sugar Creek and Briar Creek Subbasin, Mecklenburg County, NC. Hydraulic Analyses - HEC-RAS Models

Appendix Q Draft Location Hydraulic Study Report For the State Route 32 Widening Between Fir Street and Yosemite Drive at Dead Horse Slough and South

APPENDIX 4 ARROYO MODELING

Table of Contents: Section 1: Introduction Purpose Project Authority Project Location Methodologies Used for

Flooding of the Androscoggin River during December 18-19, 2003, in Canton, Maine

LAKE COUNTY HYDROLOGY DESIGN STANDARDS

5th Street Bridge Replacement Project Yuba City, California Location Hydraulic Study Report Bridge No. 18C0012

The prioritization list along with the estimated probable construction cost and future cost index is shown in Table 1.

BULLOCH COUNTY, GEORGIA

Characterizing the Soap Lake Floodplain CHAPTER 2

MARATHON COUNTY, WISCONSIN AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Project Drainage Report

What to Expect When You re Expecting A LOMR. Mark Seidelmann, PE, GISP ASFPM 2015, Atlanta Georgia

Alternatives for Willow Creek Flood Mitigation Study

DRAFT LOCATION HYDRAULIC REPORT

Disaster Response Flood Recovery Data for Doña Ana County, New Mexico & Incorporated Areas

Jacobi, Toombs, and Lanz, Inc.

LIST OF TABLES.II LIST OF FIGURES.II LIST OF ATTACHMENTS.II I. INTRODUCTION.1 II. STUDY AREA.3 III

Chapter 6 Erosion & Stormwater Study Team

III. INVENTORY OF EXISTING FACILITIES

Chapter 4. Drainage Report and Construction Drawing Submittal Requirements

SEWRPC Staff Memorandum

Hydraulic and Sediment Transport Modeling Strategy

HYDRAULIC STUDY OF TURNERS FALLS IMPOUNDMENT, BYPASS REACH AND BELOW CABOT

water resource specialists

TREMPEALEAU COUNTY, WISCONSIN AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Appendix B Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Requirements Checklist

PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULICS ANALYSES RESULTS

Transcription:

JEFFERSONVILLE STORMWATER MASTER PLAN HYDRAULICS APPENDIX JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA Prepared for: City of Jeffersonville November 2011 Prepared by Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 115 W. Washington St., Suite 1368-South Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 CBBEL Project Number 11-0021

November 2011 Jeffersonville Stormwater Master Plan Hydraulics Appendix TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES... ii LIST OF EXHIBITS... ii LIST OF APPENDICES... ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS... 2 2.1 INTRODUCTION... 2 2.2 HEC-RAS INPUT DATA... 2 2.2.1 Topographic Work Map... 2 2.2.2 Study Reach... 2 2.2.3 Flow Data... 3 2.2.4 Starting Water Surface Elevation... 3 2.2.5 Cross Section Geometric Data... 3 2.2.6 Manning's Roughness Coefficients... 4 2.2.7 Calibration... 4 2.2.8 Ineffective Flow and Blocked Obstructions... 4 2.2.9 Bridges... 4 2.2.10 Culverts... 4 2.2.11 Critical Depths... 4 2.2.12 Floodway... 4 2.3 LANCASSANGE CREEK... 5 2.4 FINAL RESULTS OF HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS... 5 3.0 REFERENCES... 6 Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. i

November 2011 Jeffersonville Stormwater Master Plan Hydraulics Appendix LIST OF TABLES Page 1. Peak Discharges Used in Model... 3 LIST OF EXHIBITS 1. Lick Run Topographic Workmap 2. Lick Run Tributary 4 Topographic Workmap 3. Lick Run Trib 1 Topographic Workmap 4. Lancassange Creek Topographic Workmap 5. Lentzier Creek Topographic Workmap 6. Battle Creek Topographic Workmap 7. Jenny Lind Run Topographic Workmap LIST OF APPENDICES 1. Lick Run Coordinated Discharge Curve 2. Lancassange Creek Flood Profile 3. HEC-RAS Models Output Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. ii

November 2011 Jeffersonville Stormwater Master Plan Hydraulics Appendix 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report documents the results of a Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. (CBBEL) hydraulic analysis of reaches of seven streams in Jeffersonville, Clark County, Indiana. The analysis was completed to determine approximate base flood elevations for reaches of Lick Run, Lick Run Tributary 4, Lick Run Tributary 1, Lancassange Creek, Lentzier Creek, Battle Creek and Jenny Lind Run to determine any potential flooding areas along the streams. This analysis along with the Preliminary Flood Insurance Study (FIS) delineations provides floodplain limits for all stream reaches within Jeffersonville that have one square mile or over drainage area as determined by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). The study reaches are located throughout Jeffersonville as shown outlined in red in Figure 1. Figure 1: Study Reaches Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 1

November 2011 Jeffersonville Stormwater Master Plan Hydraulics Appendix 2.0 HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS 2.1 INTRODUCTION This section of the report presents the modeling developed for the hydraulic analysis for the seven stream reaches. The modeling was completed in accordance with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) Modeling Guidelines for approximate studies. 2.2 HEC-RAS INPUT DATA The hydraulic analysis developed for this analysis was completed using the Army Corps of Engineers HEC-RAS computer program, version 4.1 for all the streams except Lancassange Creek, which is discussed in Section 2.3. The nature and source of information that was used to develop the model for the analysis of the streams is provided below. 2.2.1 Topographic Work Map CBBEL used the Jeffersonville 2-foot contour interval topography provided by the City of Jeffersonville in 2011, as the base map for Lick Run, Lick Run Tributary 4, Lick Run Tributary 1, and Lancassange Creek. The vertical datum for the mapping is NAVD 1988. CBBEL used the USGS 5-foot contour interval topography, dated 1993, as the base map for Lentzier Creek, Battle Creek, and Jenny Lind Run. The vertical datum for this mapping is NGVD 1929. A copy of the map, showing the location and orientation of cross sections used in the hydraulic modeling is provided as Exhibits 1-7 for each of the stream reaches. 2.2.2 Study Reaches The study reach for Lick Run starts at Cross Section 2.474 from the detailed modeling created for the current Preliminary Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and continues upstream approximately 3.8 miles to approximately 1,060 feet downstream of Veteran s Parkway. The study reach for Lick Run Tributary 4 starts at the confluence with Lick Run and continues upstream approximately 0.76 miles. The study reach for Lick Run Tributary 1 starts at the confluence with Lick Run and continues upstream approximately 0.58 miles. The study reach for Lentzier Creek starts at Cross Section 4.72 from the detailed modeling for the preliminary FIS and continues upstream approximately 1.1 miles. The study reach for Battle Creek starts at the confluence with the Ohio River and continues upstream approximately 0.7 miles. The study reach for Jenny Lind Run starts at the confluence with the Ohio River and continues upstream approximately 0.4 miles. Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 2

November 2011 Jeffersonville Stormwater Master Plan Hydraulics Appendix 2.2.3 Flow Data Flow data for the simulation of the 100-year storm event for Lick Run was taken from the discharge at the upstream limit of the Preliminary FIS model mentioned in the previous section. Flow data for Lick Run Tributary 4 and Lick Run Tributary 1 were taken from the existing Lick Run Coordinated Discharge Graph, which is included in Appendix 1. Flow data for Lentzier Creek was taken from the discharge at the upstream limit of the Preliminary FIS model. Flow data for Battle Creek and Jenny Lind Run were taken from the CBBEL hydrologic analysis discussed in the Hydrologic Appendix. Table 1 summarizes the discharges used for each of the streams. Stream Table 1 Peak Discharges Used in the Hydraulic Models HEC-RAS Cross Section Reach Recurrence Interval (Year) 100 Peak Discharge (cfs) Lick Run 2.474 3.186 807 Lick Run Tributary 4 0.000 0.757 695 Lick Run Tributary 1 0.027 0.577 390 Lentzier Creek 4.770 6.272 1350 Battle Creek 0.019 0.683 1562 Jenny Lind Run 0.009 0.419 1744 2.2.4 Starting Water Surface Elevation The starting water surface elevation for the 100-year storm event for Lick Run was taken from the water surface elevation at Cross Section 2.474 in the Preliminary FIS model. The starting water surface elevation for Lick Run Tributary 4 was taken from the water surface elevation at Cross Section 2.275 from the Preliminary FIS model of Lick Run. The starting water surface elevations form Lick Run Tributary 1, Lentzier Creek, Battle Creek, and Jenny Lind Run were calculated by using the slope-area method or normal depth. 2.2.5 Cross Section Geometric Data Cross-section geometric data was taken directly from the topographic base map described above. All cross sections were aligned to best represent a perpendicular orientation to flow. Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 3

November 2011 Jeffersonville Stormwater Master Plan Hydraulics Appendix 2.2.6 Manning's Roughness Coefficients Manning's roughness coefficients for Lick Run, Lick Run Tributary 4, and Lick Run Tributary 1 were taken from the Preliminary FIS modeling for the detailed study of Lick Run. Manning s roughness coefficients for Lick Run and Lick Run Tributary 4 are 0.045 for the channel and 0.075 for the overbanks. For Lick Run Tributary 1, they are 0.05 for the channel and 0.08 for the overbanks. The Manning s roughness coefficients for Lentzier Creek were taken from the downstream modeling for the stream in the Preliminary FIS. The Manning s roughness coefficients are 0.06 for the channel and 0.08 for the overbanks. The Manning s roughness coefficients for Battle Creek and Jenny Lind Run were taken from aerial photographs, and they are 0.05 for the channel and 0.08 for the overbanks. 2.2.7 Calibration No calibration was performed on the streams. 2.2.8 Ineffective Flow and Blocked Obstructions Ineffective flow limits were modeled for Lick Run Tributary 4 and Lick Run Tributary 1. The ineffective flow limits were used to reflect high ground not captured in the cross section data. 2.2.9 Bridges Since the modeling was approximate, existing bridges were not included in the model. 2.2.10 Culverts Since the modeling was approximate, existing culverts were not included in the model. 2.2.11 Critical Depths No critical depths were calculated for the 100-year profile. 2.2.12 Floodway No floodway analysis was performed on the streams. Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 4

November 2011 Jeffersonville Stormwater Master Plan Hydraulics Appendix 2.3 LANCASSANGE CREEK Due to the short study reach of Lancassange Creek, a hydraulic model was not developed for this stream. The study reach for Lancassange Creek starts at the upstream limit of the FIS (Section O) and continues upstream for approximately 0.15 miles. The approximate 100-year water surface elevation for the additional study reach was determined based on the assumption that the depth of flow at the upstream end of the detailed study in the FIS would be applicable for the short additional reach studied for this analysis. Based on the Lancassange Creek Flood Profile Sheet 04P in the FIS, the depth of flow at the upstream limit was 10.2 feet. The Lancassange Creek Flood Profile from the FIS is included in Appendix 2. The 10.2 foot depth was added to the channel invert at each of the cross sections to determine the approximate water surface elevations for the current study reach. 2.4 FINAL RESULTS OF HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Utilizing the input data described in Section 2.2, HEC-RAS existing condition models for the streams were developed. A copy of the model output for each stream is included as Appendix 3. A disk with digital copies of the models and the floodplain mapping shapefiles are provided as in the Hydraulics Appendix on the master CD provided for the Master Plan. Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 5

November 2011 Jeffersonville Stormwater Master Plan Hydraulics Appendix 3.0 REFERENCES City of Jeffersonville, 2-foot contour interval topography, NAVD 1988 datum. USGS, 5-foot contour interval topography, NAVD 1988 datum, Dated 1993. Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 6

November 2011 Jeffersonville Stormwater Master Plan Hydraulics Appendix APPENDIX 1 LICK RUN COORDINATED DISCHARGE CURVE Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd.

10000 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 100 Year Flood 2 Discharge (Cfs) 1000 9 8 7 MOUTH 6 5 4 3 2 State of Indiana DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Water Coordinated Discharge Graph Lick Run CLARK COUNTY, IN. 100 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 10 100 Total Drainage Area (Square Miles) October 2005