Involving Stakeholders in the Professional s Design and Construction Process

Similar documents
2008 Questions & Solutions Engineering, Inc.

School Assessment Report

Show how a KM database impacts: cost, time, and quality. Demonstrate how Parametric Design could be used to save time, money, and improve quality

School Assessment Report

School Assessment Report

School Assessment Report

School Assessment Report

School Assessment Report

Copyright Materials 11/8/2012. Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives. Eden Project The Core Cornwall, England

Conference For Catholic Facility Management. Track 8 Making Cents of Financing and Building in this Economy

School Assessment Report

Making Engineering Ethics Live: Ethical Lessons from the Real World DPLE 279 August 17, 2016

G703 Continuation Sheet Minimum Schedule of Values Please use the breakdown listed below when submitting your billing for the project

SAULT COLLEGE OF APPLIED ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY SAULT STE. MARIE, ONTARIO COURSE OUTLINE

Copyright Materials. Learning Objectives

2012 IBC Exit Systems

USGBC National Capital Region MasterClass Series: The Ins and Outs of Existing Building Commissioning Analysis Credit

Hindsight is 20/20: Lessons Learned in Courthouse Construction

Audio Presentation. Session 3 DESIGN. Project Delivery Education Program. Construction Document Technology (CDT) Preparatory Course

Report For Class D Construction Cost Estimate

2012 TAS. Did you sign-in? Atelier. the first year. Course Description. Latest with TDLR. Learning Objectives TAS The First Year April 2013

2015 IBC Exit Systems

Energy Code Compliance:

Measuring the Impact of BIM in Design-Bid-Build

Building Information Modeling (BIM) Execution Plan

Questions related to specific materials, methods, and services will be addressed at the conclusion of this presentation.

Audio Sessions. Session 5 MEETINGS. Construction Contract Administration Education Program

Commissioning Case Study: University of Iowa s Bowen Science Building HVAC Modernization Project Course Number: CXENERGY1630

Detailing For Wood Shrinkage

IEBC: How to Address Challenging Code Issues; and, Let s Find Answers

Full-Scope Commissioning for High-Quality Buildings

10/25/13. BC Wood Arenas - Design and Construction of Wood Recreational Facilities. Copyright Materials

CONSTRUCTION COST BREAKDOWN THIS IS FORM CCB

An Engineering Perspective on Mass Timber Design in the Southeast

2014 PMKC Webinar. PM Series The Business Case for the 2030 Challenge

Implementing Budget Solutions for Schools: Construction Cost and Scheduling Benefits of Using Wood

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STATEMENT OF QUANTITIES. Item No. Description Quantity Estimated Mobilization 1 LS

Learning Objectives. Copyright Materials NONSTRUCTURAL PROVISIONS FOR MULTI STORY WOOD FRAMED BUILDINGS 2009 WASHINGTON STATE BUILDING CODE (WSBC )

how to read an energy model

APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT

HMFH ARCHITECTS VO LU M E 3 O F 3. Vo l u m e 3 1. Brookline High School Campus Expansion Feasibility Study Brookline High School Feasibility Study

HMFH ARCHITECTS VO LU M E 3 O F 3. Vo l u m e 3 1. Brookline High School Campus Expansion Feasibility Study Brookline High School Feasibility Study

Building Enclosure Detailing for Balconies

Building Enclosure Pre-construction Meeting

AND BUILDING ENERGY CODES. NFRC Webinar/Membership Meeting March 25, 2014

PRIVATE PLAN ROOM. Document Information Sheet

Feasibility Site Report

More with Less: An Overview of the 1 st CLT Hotel in the U.S. Jeff Morrow Northwest Wood Solutions Fair Portland, OR April 26, 2016 AIA #16NW04

Hazardous Materials G

Modular Wood Framing Goes Vertical

Please comply with the Lean Construction Institute s Usage Policies and Attribution Guidelines at

City of Roanoke. Commercial Permit Submittal Guidelines

Codes, Standards & Guidelines, Oh My! Michael Chelednik, AIA Sr. Airport Terminal Architect URS

DeKalb County School District/Stadiums Avondale Stadium Final School Assessment Report May 20, 2016

How to Estimate the Cost of a Medical Office Building Using Conceptual BIM (DProfiler)

From View Calculation to Fabrication A Manhattan Residential Project

Archdiocesan Procedures For Building and Renovation Projects

Archdiocesan Procedures For Building and Renovation Projects

Thermal Bridging Solutions. Improving Building Envelope Performance

2019 Southern Regional Conference. Daniel A. Dain, AIA, LEED AP BD+C

Insulation Technologies and Installation Specifications for Better Energy Performance of Commercial Buildings

JOB ORDER CONTRACTING INFORMATIONAL SEMINAR. Monday, June 27, 2016

Architectural Design and Build Process. A Client Guide

Commissioning the Building Envelope

Upper Adams School District Facility Study Presentation Part 2 November 17, 2016

COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION

Gerald R. Ford Museum

Copyright Materials TIMBER TOWER RESEARCH PROJECT BY SOM. Learning Objectives

Air Barrier and shelf angle design, detailing, and lessons learned

1.0 Total Points % 2.1 Building Exterior Elements % 2.2 Accessibility % 2.3 Structural %

Streaming BIM Lifecycle Information. Murray Hestley, Whiting-Turner Construction Eric Nulton, Penn State University

CONCURRENT ADVERTISEMENT FOR SUBCONTRACTOR PREQUALIFICATION AND BIDS

Efficiently Produced Construction Documents are Quality Construction Documents

BUILDING ENCLOSURE COMMISSIONING EDUCATION

Fees and Permit requirements are regulated by the Township s Building By-law

Applying the Building Code During Design

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

MANHATTAN COLLEGE STUDENT COMMONS

Appendix J - Custom Uniformat for EDU Migration

Greene County Department of Building Regulation Residential Permit, Plan Approval, & Inspection Process

COMMERCIAL PROJECT INFORMATION

Franklin Hall Renovation TABLE OF Document Indiana University Bloomington

1.0 ABOUT THE NU GUIDELINES

Schedule T5. Tender Documents. This tender is for: Tender Documents: The documents issued for this tender include the following: Tender Schedules

SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT OR SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE Information and Required Forms for Structures in Flood Zones AE & VE

date: 10 july 2012 the pennsylvania state university: burrowes building

Project Scope & Budget Breakdown. Mandatory Scope Recommended Additional Scope Wish List Scope

COMMISSIONING PROCESS FOR BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS ASHRAE STANDARD 202

OBJECTIVE 1.1: To establish the acceptable use and capacity of each building.

The International Building Code (IBC ) is a model code that provides minimum requirements to safeguard the public health, safety and general welfare

Design Professionals. Acoustics

3,740. Demonstrating Competent Performance SIX EXPERIENCE AREAS. INTRODUCTION What is the Architectural Experience Program?

Copyright Materials. CLT Academy Building in UK. Registration. Copyright. Learning Objectives

Shear Wall Design Examples per 2015 WFCM and 2015 SDPWS

Yardmen Arena Expansion & Renovation Project Update

Property: Operator Info: Operator: Estimator: Sales/Estimator. Labor Efficiency:

Code Compliant Fire- Resistance Design for Wood Construction

Construction Documents Education Program

Transcription:

Involving Stakeholders in the Professional s Design and Construction Process Presented By: Peter Trozze, AIA Managing Director of Middle Eastern Operations

Continuing Education The Middle East Chapter of the American Institute of Architects (AIAME) is a Registered Provider with The American Institute of Architects Continuing Education Systems (AIA/CES). Credit(s) earned on completion of this program will be reported to AIA/CES for AIA members. Certificates of Completion for both AIA members and non- AIA members are available upon request. This program is registered with AIA/CES for continuing professional education. As such, it does not include content that may be deemed or construed to be an approval or endorsement by the AIA of any material of construction or any method or manner of handling, using, distributing, or dealing in any material or product. Questions related to specific materials, methods, and services will be addressed at the conclusion of this presentation

Copyright Materials This presentation is protected by US and International Copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, display and use of the presentation without written permission of the speaker is prohibited.

Course Description In October 2010, the AIA/CES System was updated with the new CES Discovery System, in that time we have transferred more than one million records. This new update has made it necessary to remind us of the AIA/CES policies and procedures, to introduce the new provider ethics, and to reintroduce the AIA/CES audits/quality assurance program. This presentation covers those areas giving providers the opportunity to give feedback and input.

Learning Objectives At the end of this program, each participant will be able to: 1.Discuss the importance of stakeholder involvement in the design and construction process 2.Identify and include stakeholders in the design and construction process 3.Understand the importance of the Stakeholder involvement process during data gathering, programming, design, tendering, value engineering, construction, and post construction 4.Discuss in depth the contribution of the Design Charrette, Tender Value Engineering, and the Construction process in the ultimate success of your design project 5.Share lessons learned feedback from the participants of the seminar

Stakeholders Who is a stakeholder and how do their needs differ? Financier (Public Agency; Private Owner) Facility Managers - Maintenance team End Users - People for which the project will be designed Others Project Specific What can happen if they are not nurtured and satisfied? Lack of trust in the professional Breakdown in communications Loss of project control by the professional What power do the Stakeholders hold? Influence the success of the design of the project Influence the professional s profitability of the project Influence the award of future projects with this client and others

Stakeholders Financier (Public Agency or Private Owner) They will want to make sure that the professional is fiscally competent They will mandate that the professional stay within budget The professional will need to give them good value for their investment Facility Managers They will want to set the quality of the project They usually have needed information for the project They will be responsible for taking care of the building after it is built End Users Others They will occupy the building on a day to day basis They will want as much in the program as they can get usually without regard for budget or reliability Government jurisdictions Community groups Other special interests

Major Client Touchpoints Project Interview Process* Charrette* Design Construction Documents Tender Value Engineering* Project Construction* Post-Construction

Touchpoints We Will Cover Project Interview Process Charrette Design Construction Documents Tender Value Engineering Project Construction Post-Construction

Project Interview Process This is usually the professional s first contact with the client s financial group, the facilities group, and the end users The success in being awarded the project is directly attributed to stakeholder buy-in at this stage of the project Seize this opportunity to discuss how your team can satisfy each of their interests during the project

The Charrette The best forum to involve all of the stakeholders early in the process The vehicle to build the foundation for trust in the professional Typical Charrette Agenda Identify the stakeholders and give each of them the opportunity to explain what they would like accomplished for the project Gather information that will have an impact on the project Existing Conditions Program Parti Identify all of the stakeholder issues Rank the issues by vote of all of the stakeholders Identify the most critical (go/no go) issues Gain consensus on the final list of issues

The Charrette Objectives To listen to the concerns of the Owners/Financiers, the Facility Managers, the End Users, and any Special Interest Groups To gather information on existing conditions of the project from each stakeholder To gather information on the proposed ideas on the project from each stakeholder Set goals and prepare a schedule for meeting those goals Set project schedule Methodology Involve all of the stakeholders Make sure that all of their information and concerns are addressed Develop a method of review and accountability

Tender Value Engineering A very critical period for the welfare of the project involving a new player on the team who has not been involved in the process to date the PM/Construction Contractor Conflicting issues between the financial stakeholders, the facility managers, end users and now the project manager or construction contractor Explain and define the team approach as you have developed it throughout the project Emphasize the fact that not all cost-cutting measures are in the best interest of all parties BUILDING COST SUMMARY PART 2 Project Code 260-17701 Sheet Number 2 of 3 Gross SF 51,458 SF Date Prepared: 2/15/10 Overall Project Title: Phase III Academic Services Bldg, Germanna Community College Specific Building Included on This Sheet : Phase III Academic Services Building Type of Work ( X ) New Building ( ) Addition ( ) Renovation ( ) Master Summary Sheet LINE SYSTEM SYSTEM UNIT OF SYSTEM SYSTEM TOTAL COST PER NO. DESCRIPTION MEASURE MEAS. QUANTITY UNIT COST COST GROSS SF BUILDING: 1 FOUNDATION Ground Floor Area SF 19,342 $12.48 $241,424 $4.69 2 SLAB ON GRADE Slab-on-Grade Area SF 19,342 $4.56 $88,227 $1.71 3 STRUCTURAL FRAME Gross Bldg. Area SF 51,458 $17.00 $874,617 $17.00 4 SUPPORTED FLOOR Supp'd Floor Area SF 31,900 $8.29 $264,305 $5.14 5 ROOF STRUCTURE Roof Surface Area SF 18,900 $22.79 $430,676 $8.37 6 ROOFING Roof Surface Area SF 18,900 $16.30 $308,116 $5.99 7 STAIRS Total No. of Risers EA 142 $1,293.75 $183,713 $3.57 8 ELEVATORS Total No. of Stops EA 3 $97,627.21 $292,882 $5.69 9 EXTERIOR WALLS Wall Area (1 Side) SF 17,049 $41.26 $703,491 $13.67 10 INTERIOR WALLS Wall Area (1 Side) SF 51,458 $11.27 $579,850 $11.27 11 INTERIOR FINISHES Gross Bldg. Area SF 51,458 $20.54 $1,057,190 $20.54 12 DOORS & HARDWARE Surf. Area (1 Side) SF 4,668 $82.57 $385,418 $7.49 13 WINDOWS & GLAZED WALLS Surf. Area (1 Side) SF 14,049 $108.04 $1,517,837 $29.50 14 SPECALTIES Gross Bldg. Area SF 51,458 $18.80 $967,353 $18.80 15 PLUMBING (DOMESTIC) No. of Fixtures EA 42 $19,589.54 $822,761 $15.99 240 (X ) MBH ( X ) TONS 16 HVAC SYSTEM TN $8,866.59 $2,127,981 $41.35 17 FIRE PROTECTION Protected Area SF 51,458 $5.68 $292,143 $5.68 18 POWER Gross Bldg. Area SF 51,458 $17.97 $924,784 $17.97 19 LIGHTING Gross Bldg. Area SF 51,458 $11.29 $580,779 $11.29 20 SPECIAL ELECTRICAL Gross Bldg. Area SF 51,458 $8.22 $423,060 $8.22 21 SPECIAL SYSTEMS Gross Bldg. Area SF 0 $0.00 $0.00 $13,066,60 6 22 SUBTOTAL $253.93 23 INTERIOR DEMOLITION Demolition Area SF $0.00 $0 $0.00 24 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL ABATEMENT Abatement Area SF $0.00 $0 $0.00 25 SUBTOTAL $13,066,60 6 $253.93 26 BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT Gross Bldg. Area SF 51,458 $35.64 $1,834,179 $35.64 27 TOTAL BUILDING $14,900,78 6 $289.57 SITEWORK & UTILITIES: 28 EXT. ELECTR. DISTRIBUTION Length of Run LF 1 $143,570.00 $143,570 29 AREA LIGHTING No. of Fixtures EA 50 $2,930.26 $146,513 30 EXT. MECH. DISTRIBUTION Length of Run LF 0 $0.00 $0 31 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Length of Run LOT 987 $107.77 $106,372 32 SANITARY SEWER Length of Run LF 408 $152.19 $62,094 33 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM Length of Run LF 580 $201.86 $117,077 34 SUBTOTAL UTILITIES $575,626 35 ROADS Surface Area SY 1,089 $0.00 $70,356 36 PARKING Surface Area SY 375 $0.00 $19,884 37 EARTHWORK Volume (Cut/Fill) CY 2,865 $0.00 $263,422 38 LANDSCAPING Area Planted SY 5,444 $0.00 $130,660 39 SITE IMPROVEMENTS Area Developed SY 2,000 $0.00 $308,419 40 FENCING Length of Fence LF 0 $0.00 $0 41 SPECIAL BLDG. FOUNDATIONS Combined Length LF 0 $0.00 $0 42 SITE DEMOLITION Demolition Area SY 670 $0.00 $33,754 43 SUBTOTAL SITEWORK $826,495 44 TOTAL SITEWORK & UTILITIES $1,402,121 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $16,302,90 7

Tender Value Engineering Value Engineering Agenda Describe the relationship of the stakeholders to the project manager/construction contractor and encourage his buy-in on the process If a value engineering moderator has been brought on board, encourage his buy-in into the process also Address the project budget in relation to the latest construction estimates Identify cost saving measures Address each cost saving measure with each and all of the stakeholders and set priorities on cost cutting measures. Explore ways to increase the budget if necessary Encourage reaching an agreement on cost savings measures by mutual agreement of all of the stakeholders

Construction Re-emphasize the relationship of the stakeholders to the project manager/construction contractor and encourage his buy-in on the process Encourage a clear understanding of the roles and responsibilities of each of the construction entities Develop a non-confrontational alliance between the PM/construction contractor, the stakeholders site representative, and the professional Develop a mutual trust between the PM/construction contractor, the stakeholders site representative, and the professional Always tell the truth! Set reasonable goals on monetary changes to the project and encourage buy-in from the stakeholders and the pm/contractor Nip any conflict early prior to it escalating into a full confrontation Encourage active communication at all construction project meetings among all parties

Construction Allow for a time in each meeting agenda to discuss any potential concerns or issues that may have arisen since the previous meeting Make sure that each party is living up to its project obligations: Owner paying the construction contractor on time or early Contractor staying on schedule and producing quality workmanship Professional keeping on schedule with shop drawings, RFI s, change requests, etc. All paperwork addressed in a timely manner by all Stakeholders Involve the Other Stakeholders when appropriate Include all parties in promotional events during the construction phase Always emphasize that the construction is being completed by the team and not just by the construction contractor

Construction Advantages of the stakeholder model of design and construction delivery: The project closer meets the needs of the Client The project usually is built less expensively and with fewer conflicts in the field The Client will want to engage the Professional and the contractor on future projects The professional will be able to have better designs accepted by the Client

Thank You For Attending Peter Trozze, AIA Managing Director of Middle East Operations P.O Box 62844 Abu Dhabi, UAE +971 (0) 56.197.0160 ptrozze@delta-services-group.com