UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D.C., 20460

Similar documents
METAM SODIUM AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO METHYL BROMIDE FOR FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PRODUCTION AND ORCHARD REPLANTING

Air quality in the San Joaquin

EPA Update: Status of Soil Fumigant Regulatory Activities

Vegetables. Asparagus Production Up 13 Percent from 2017 Onion Production Down 5 Percent from 2017 Strawberry Production Down 1 Percent from 2017

Step 1: Get Started - Farmer Self-Assessment

Step 1: Get Started - Farmer Self-Assessment

Irrigation Scheduling

Characterizing U.S. Fruit and Vegetable Production

Mississippi Fresh Produce Availability Calendar

2018 Farmers Markets Price Reports

PRICES OF COMMODITY PRODUCTS

Chapel Hill Farmers' Market

PLANT ENTERPRISES PRODUCTION

Farmers & Farmers Market Handbook

CINNERATE KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN CAUTION

Chapel Hill Farmers' Market NEW MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION PACKET ( )

Whole Soil Fertility Step-by-Step

Global Status of Commercialized Biotech Crops. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications

Global Minor-Use Summit

A brief focus on Georgia s agricultural industry

Farm Eligibility Table. Fire & Allied. Classification. FL/GL Auto

MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION

Hop Area Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value States and United States:

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Request for Methyl Bromide Critical Use Exemption

Adding Value with Horticulture Farming

Table 10: U.S. AGRICULTURAL IMPORTS FROM CANADA, 1995 AND 1996

Table 8: U.S. AGRICULTURAL IMPORTS FROM MEXICO, 1995 AND 1996

Founded in Houston, TX as a biotechnological, innovative

Methyl Bromide: Montreal Protocol. and Quarantine and Preshipment

Cover Crops Grow Your Own Fertilizer

Farmers & Farmers Market Handbook

This presentation is sponsored by the Beginning Farmer and Rancher Development Program INTEGRATED FARMS

Under drought conditions when water may be in short supply, growers often need to

Agricultural Producers Price Index. the Second Half of (Prices of vegetable crops)

Animal-based agriculture Vs. Plant-based agriculture. A multi-product data comparison. [CURRENT DATA] March 22, 2017

California s International Agricultural Exports in 2004

Benefits of the UPOV System of Plant Variety Protection for farmers and growers: U.S. Perspective Bangkok, Thailand February 23, 2017

MICROFARMING: Growing for Farmers Markets August 27, Susan Head Mississippi Department of Agriculture and Commerce

Maryland May 21, 2009 R. David Myers

What do you need to know about FSMA s Produce Safety Rule.

JECAM Guidelines for cropland and crop type definition and field data collection

Agricultural Producers Price Index

Air Monitoring of Pesticides in California

Organic Crop Production: Crop Rotation

Market opportunities for Queensland agribusiness from FTAs with China, Japan and South Korea. Queensland Production

California s International Agricultural Exports in 2002

Chris Konieczka Extension Educator, Local Food Systems and Small Farms Livingston/McLean/Woodford Unit

Vegetable Crops BM START

on Pesticide Use Matthew Buck Assistant Director

Energy Efficiency, Food Miles and Fuel Usage in Food Transport

Crop Statistics in Germany

2017 COLUSA COUNTY CROP REPORT

Economic overview of the biostimulants sector in Europe

PNW Comment Coordinator FY 05 Annual Report July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2005

Prices Received, Prices Paid, and Ratio of Prices Received to Prices Paid Indexes 2011 Base United States: December 2018 with Comparisons

Field Fumigation Update

Background Information for Interpreting Soil Nutrient Test Results FVSNS 2012

Payment details: 2018 Saturday Market Vendor Application

Agricultural Prices. Special Note. January Prices Received Index Down 4.5 Percent

2/11/2015. Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program for 2015 and Subsequent Crop years

Oregon County and S ate Agricultural Estimates

FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS for the Lower Rio Grande Valley

CONTROL OF PESTS WITH ALTERNATIVE CHEMICALS TO METHYL BROMIDE FOR POLYETHYLENE MULCHED TOMATO

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY 2007 CROP REPORT

Agricultural Prices. May Farm Prices Received Index Declined 2 Points

PORTAGE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FARMERS MARKET 2018 APPLICATION COMPLETE THESE PAGES 1 THROUGH 4 AND RETURN TO MARKET MANAGER

ABOUT DPR S PROPOSED DECISION

Colusa County Department of Agriculture Crop Report. Harry A. Krug Agricultural Commissioner

In 2003 California s agricultural exports increased 14

Payment details: 2018 Midweek Market Vendor Application

FOR DISTRIBUTION AND USE ONLY WITHIN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. Reflex Herbicide For Control of Weeds in Transplanted Tomatoes and Transplanted Peppers

National Census of Agriculture September 9 November

Introduction to PKalc

Tall Harvest, SumaGrow Inside

Using Stewardship to Market Advantage. Scott Exo Executive Director

Putting Together a Plan

COLUSA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 2011 CROP REPORT JOSEPH J. DAMIANO AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONER

The Nutrition of Soil Grown Horticultural Crops

Contents: Reduced irrigation and restricted water supply Adapted irrigation systems 3 15

Crop Protection Research Institute

Now there is a Better Way to Grow Crops. One of the best products ever for Agriculture

Agricultural CROP REPORT. Yolo County

Agricultural Prices. Special Note. May Prices Received Index Increased 1.7 Percent

Farm Profile. Name: Mailing Address: Phone: Cell phone: County (or counties) in which you farm:

Agricultural Prices. October Prices Received Index Down 3.5 Percent

Crossroads Resource Center

Exhibit 3.2 Missouri Acreage Used to Harvest Vegetables for Sale, 1997 to ,404 21,804 20,213

Prices Received, Prices Paid, and Ratio of Prices Received to Prices Paid Indexes 2011 Base United States: February 2015 with Comparisons

Business or Farm Name: Business/Farm Mailing Address: Street/PO Box City & State Zip

Irrigation Technology and Design. 1. Why do we Irrigate? How do we apply irrigation water? KPU Small Farm Sessions 2/13/2016

Agricultural CROP REPORT. Yolo County

Agricultural Prices. June Prices Received Index Increased 0.1 Percent

SECTION 7. APPORTIONING DATA TO THE WATERSHED MODEL - HSPF SEGMENTATION AND LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS

Agricultural Prices. April Prices Received Index Decreased 2.2 Percent

Southern Crops Outlook for 2014: U.S. Fruits and Vegetable outlook

Spring Vegetables Up 1 Percent Processed Vegetable Acreage Up 12 Percent Onion Acreage Down 2 Percent

Executive Summary. Fruits and Berries

Prices Received, Prices Paid, and Ratio of Prices Received to Prices Paid Indexes 2011 Base United States: February 2019 with Comparisons

Welcome to the. Our members are those individuals, farms and partnerships or corporations who reside and produce or sell within our region.

FOR DISTRIBUTION AND USE ONLY WITHIN THE STATE OF MISSOURI. Reflex Herbicide For Weed Control in Watermelon. EPA Reg. No

Transcription:

MEMORANDUM UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D.C., 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES SUBJECT: FROM: BEAD s Planned Impact Assessments on Agricultural Sites with Significant Use of Soil Fumigants (Chloropicrin, Dazomet, Methyl Bromide, Metam Potassium, and Metam Sodium) Debbie Edwards, Director Special Review and Reregistration Division (7508P) Rick Keigwin, Director Biological and Economic Analysis Division (7503P) TO: Al Jennings, Director Office of Pest Management Policy U.S. Department of Agriculture The Office of Pesticide Programs will conduct impact assessments of risk mitigation on agricultural sites identified in the attached memo for the fumigant pesticides chloropicrin, dazomet, metam potassium, metam sodium, and methyl bromide. The sites were chosen because available pesticide use information indicates that fumigants are used on a significant proportion of the crop acreage. Sites were determined to be significant based on the following criteria: (1) greater than 5% of U.S. crop acreage is treated annually with at least one fumigant, or (2) at least a total of 1 million pounds of fumigant were applied. Given that pesticide use information is often limited in scope, we are asking that this list be disseminated to stakeholders through your network for review and feedback on our choice of sites. We re also asking them to identify other crops that we should assess and indicate why. The feedback we get from stakeholders on the sites to assess is important because our assessments will be used to inform our risk mitigation decisions. Please provide stakeholder feedback to John Leahy (Leahy.John@epa.gov) and Jonathan Becker (becker.jonathan@epa.gov) of EPA by April 1, 2007.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D.C., 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: FROM: BEAD s Planned Impact Assessments on Agricultural Sites with Significant Use of Soil Fumigants (Chloropicrin, Dazomet, Methyl Bromide, Metam Potassium, and Metam Sodium) Bill Chism, Senior Agronomist Jonathan Becker, Senior Science Advisor Biological Analysis Branch David Donaldson, Economist TJ Wyatt, Economist Economic Analysis Branch Biological and Economic Analysis Division (7503P) THRU: Arnet Jones, Chief Biological Analysis Branch Tim Kiely, Chief Economic Analysis Branch Biological and Economic Analysis Division (7503P) TO: John Leahy, Senior Policy Analyst Special Review and Reregistration Division (7508P) Summary The Biological and Economic Analysis Division (BEAD) has identified U.S. agricultural sites with significant fumigant pesticide use. These sites were identified as part of the Agency s reregistration evaluation for the soil uses of the following fumigant pesticides: 1

chloropicrin, dazomet, metam potassium, metam sodium, and methyl bromide. BEAD will focus its assessments of the potential impacts of fumigant risk mitigation on these sites. With this memo, we are providing a list of crops with significant fumigant use and our rationale for choosing these crops. We are also soliciting input from stakeholders on crops that may have significant use of the above fumigants but that were not identified by available data. Significant Fumigant Agricultural Use Sites. BEAD identified the following agricultural sites as having significant fumigant use and anticipates focusing the assessment of the potential impacts of fumigant risk mitigation on these sites. List 1. Crops for which EPA anticipates assessing the impacts of risk mitigation. Cantaloupes Peppers Carrots Potatoes Cucumbers Squash Eggplant Strawberries Forest Seedlings Sweet Potato Nursery Crops 1 Tobacco Onions Tomatoes Orchard Replant, California 2 Watermelons Peanuts 1. The benefits of fumigant use for nursery crop producers will be assessed, however, BEAD will likely focus on a representative crop or crops. See Appendi A for crops within the nursery crop category. 2. Includes grape, tree nut, and stone fruit orchard replant in California. How We Determined These Sites To Be Significant. These sites were determined to be significant fumigant agricultural use sites based on the following criteria: (1) greater than 5% of U.S. crop acreage are treated annually with at least one fumigant, or (2) at least a total of 1 million pounds of fumigant were applied for the fumigants chloropicrin, dazomet, methyl bromide, metam potassium, metam sodium, and 1,3-dichloropropene 1. In order to determine if the criteria were met, BEAD reviewed available pesticide use information and data sources. These sources include commercial proprietary pesticide use data (e.g., Doane Marketing Research, Inc.), United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA NASS) surveys of pesticide use, California Pesticide Use Reports, USDA Crop Profiles, and articles from the published scientific literature. 1 The reregistration eligibility decision for 1,3-dichloropropene has been complete and further regulatory actions for 1,3-dichloropropene are not anticipated. However, we included 1,3-dichloropropene in our calculations because it is so frequently mied with chloropicrin and we did not want to omit these use sites. 2

These sources were supplemented with telephone and e-mail contacts with crop etension agents, grower associations, and other knowledgeable eperts in the field. BEAD also referred to information submitted to the Agency as part of the Methyl Bromide Critical Use Eemption process and responses from a series of questions about agricultural practices related to the use of soil fumigants that BEAD developed in conjunction with USDA s Office of Pest Management and Policy (OPMP). Responses were received from a number of growers and grower groups representing ornamental, California grapes, tree fruit, dried plums, carrots, tomatoes (fresh and processing), Virginia and North Carolina peanuts, Washington potatoes, and a variety of specialty crops from Georgia Other Fumigant Agricultural Use Sites. BEAD also identified the crops below, which have some fumigant use, but do not meet our criteria for a significant agricultural use site. BEAD does not anticipate assessing the potential impacts of fumigant risk mitigation on these sites. List 2. Crops for which EPA does not plan to assess the impacts of risk mitigation. Artichoke Figs Broccoli Green Beans Brussels Sprouts Lettuce Cauliflower Pecan Celery Pome Fruit Chicory Spinach Citrus Sugar Beets Corn Sweet Corn Cotton Wheat BEAD recognizes that available pesticide use data can be problematic for crops with low acreage (i.e., minor crops), crops that have geographically dispersed acreage, and crops with varieties that require different cultural practices. There may also be special, localized situations on some crops where the need for fumigant pesticides eists. As a result, the actual use or importance of fumigants on some crops may be substantially different from that reflected in the data sources available to BEAD. For this reason, BEAD is asking for stakeholder input on its determination of crops as significant agricultural fumigant use sites. BEAD urges the grower community to epeditiously provide information documenting the economic significance of these fumigant uses to the Agency. The information will allow the Agency to better understand the value of these fumigant uses when weighing the benefits and risks of using these pesticides. If the grower community and other stakeholders believe it important for EPA to assess the impacts of potential risk mitigation options on additional crops, please provide information describing the growing conditions and why an assessment should be conducted. Please include the following information: 3

Appendices Your contact information so that, if necessary, we can follow-up with you; Fumigants used; Pest or pests controlled; Percent of the crop treated by state, region, or other use area; Application rate; Time of year that applications are made; Method of application; Acres fumigated per day; Field preparation: flat fumigation, strip treatment, etc; Sealing methods: tarps, water seals, etc; and Best alternative controls. Appendi A. Registered Nursery / Transplant Bed Use Sites for Chloropicrin, Dazomet, Metam-potassium, Metam-sodium, Methyl Bromide, and Telone. 4

Appendi B. Registered Nursery and Transplant Bed Use Sites for Chloropicrin, Dazomet, Metam-potassium, Metam-sodium, Methyl Bromide, and Telone. Nursery and Transplant Bed (Soil) Chloropicrin Dazomet Metam potassium Metam sodium Methyl Bromide Telone Asparagus Brassica Broccoli Brassica Cauliflower Celery Citrus - Not specified Cucumbers Eggplant Forest Trees - Not specified Fruit Trees - Not specified Lettuce Melons Musk Melons - Not specified Nonfood Crops Nursery Crops Nursery Stock Nut Trees - Not specified Onions Ornamental Trees Ornamentals Ornamentals - Bulbs, Corms, Rhizomes Ornamentals - Flowering Plants Ornamentals - Herbaceous Plants Ornamentals - Woody Peanuts Pineapple Strawberries Sweet Potatoes Tobacco Tomatoes Turf - Ornamental Vegetables - Not specified Vine Fruits Yams 5