PHASE III SURVEY REPORT

Similar documents
Q9N. Likelihood of using Xpress if it meant you were better informed about how to use the bus system

Faculty Profile

Customer Experience & Satisfaction Lessons from the 2018 Rider Survey


The 21st Century Challenge: Water Policy in the Context of Climate Change

AWARENESS OF SEDGWICK COUNTY KANSAS RESIDENTS OF ADVERTISING ABOUT THE DOWNTOWN WICHITA AREA

SUPRC Maine Statewide August 2018

Diversity & Inclusion

APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT Must be 18 years of age to apply

Public /Private Partnerships: Presented by: Jawauna Greene

EAST SIDE TRANSIT EQUITY COMMUNITY COVENANT

Transportation Demand Management and the NEPA Process

General Population Survey Summary

FEBRUARY 21-MARCH 11, 2018 CITY OF HEALDSBURG COMMUNITY SURVEY WT N=536 MARGIN OF SAMPLING ERROR ±4.2% (95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL)

Skills we've learned

Diversity and Inclusion in the U.S. Graphic Communication Industry

Employment Application

Community Outreach. Arvada City Council August 27, 2018 Presented by Bill Ray, WR Communications Inc.

Fulfilling the American Dream with the CPA profession. Richard J. Caturano, CPA, CGMA Chairman of the AICPA Board of Directors

RECRUITING, RETAINING, AND ADVANCING A DIVERSE TECHNICAL WORKFORCE

WISCONSIN CONSUMER MEDIA USAGE RESEARCH STUDY. Scarborough 2013

Mayor Carter s Vision for Saint Paul

MICHIGAN CONSUMER MEDIA RESEARCH STUDY. Scarborough 2013

The Diversification of Police Departments. Megan Alderden, Amy Farrell, Wesley Skogan and Dennis Rosenbaum

Diesel and Heavy Equipment Technician Occupation Overview

Elements of a Complete Streets Policy Effective 2018

Program Development. Our Goal. Extension Program Development

Virginia General Election Voters

BOARD POLICY NO. 025 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN POLICY. Purpose

Driving Tech Talent Growth in PHL: An Update

Facilities and Services: Diversity and Inclusion Committee

Support for the Presidential Ticket and Identification with Party Predicted Convention Speech Viewing

DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION

The Planning Framework for Transportation Decision Making

CHANNEL FOUR TELEVISION CORPORATION 2014 REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERAL EQUALITY DUTY

Porter, D.R., Performance Standards for Growth Management. PAS Report 461. APA Planning Press: Chicago, IL. ed

City of Charlottesville MEMO

Advocacy and Advancement A Study by the Women s Initiatives Committee of the AICPA

Introduction. Participation Rate Stock-Flow* Coefficient projection

2017 NAMIC-WICT DIVERSITY SURVEY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

advertising x strategy

S E P T E M B E R Diversity Reporting. Question pack and process for data collection

Diversity & Inclusion Strategic Plan NextConnect Marketing Summit Atlanta, GA April 24-25, 2017

Equitable Community Engagement Blueprint

2017 Long Range Transportation Plan Public Engagement Plan. March 4, 2016

Template for legislation to establish a Racial Equity Office in your city, county or state (modeled on the City of Oakland legislation)

Computer and Mathematical Occupations in Allegheny County

Department of Sustainability Proposed 5 year Strategic Plan

44 % 5 % 1 % 36 % 14 % Bargaining

Bellwork Solve for x Match each definition of one of the following words. 3. easy to get 4. Occurring without a pattern

FY 2018 CULTURAL COMPETENCE AND DIVERSITY PLAN (CCDP) PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY VOCATIONAL SERVICES

Survey participants self-identified as a person of color 690 responses, analyzed data from 550 individuals serving on mainstream boards (not

YSU CAMPUS CLIMATE SURVEY REPORT STAFF

Regional Transit System Plan

Hospitality Management Occupation Overview

AICP EXAM REVIEW. Transportation Planning. February 19, 2016

Public Participation

Suffolk University/USA TODAY INITIAL POSTING October 2017

ABC Ramps Research Overview

Report by Customer Service and Operations Committee (A) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Equality in Health Initiative Interim Evaluation Report for Cycle 2. July 17, 2008

Exercise 1: Policies and Action Steps

Workforce Race Equality Standard

OUT-OF-HOME ADVERTISING STUDY NIELSEN ON LOCATION REPORT 2016 EDITION. Diane Williams Senior Media Research Architect Nielsen

Public Participation. Public Participation Plan and Schedule for the 10th Year Comprehensive Plan Update

Strategy Committee Workshop

- FACT SHEET - THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES

CHAPTER HIGHLIGHTS GOALS AND GUIDING POLICIES 60 SEEKING PUBLIC INPUT TO REFINE SCENARIOS FOR OUR FUTURE 61

AAP Executive Summary Office of Diversity and Affirmative Action 140 McKenny Hall, Ypsilanti, MI Phone: (734)

CONSUMER BEHAVIOR

Transportation, Mobility and Access

What influence does media have?

NEW HAMPSHIRE OCTOBER TOPLINES

CAP Western States Survey Interview Schedule

This document has been developed to provide context to the Board as part of the strategic planning process. Regional development and travel trends

CHAPTER 4 HIGHLIGHTS GOALS AND GUIDING POLICIES 64 SEEKING PUBLIC INPUT TO REFINE SCENARIOS FOR OUR FUTURE 66

MORE MARTA ATLANTA SUMMARY OF PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT Contents CONTENTS TABLE OF EXHIBITS APPENDIX 2 9/4/18

The Effects of FMLA Eligibility and Awareness on Family Leave-Taking

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN STRATEGY. A general outline for how a community may organize its public participation plan

THE REGION S PLAN POLICY FRAMEWORK. August 2015

REVISED OCTOBER Contacts for questions about use of this tool:

Introduction & Overview

Public Awareness and Opinion Blue Green Algae SURVEY MONKEY FIELD DATES: MARCH 30 - APRIL 1 SAMPLE SIZE = 615

Economic Opportunity Act (EOA) of 1964:

2007 Kansas State University Community and Climate Survey

Northwestern Indiana Regional Water Quality Survey Results

EXAMPLES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES HOW TO ESTIMATE THE BENEFITS OF THE CTR PROGRAM

Nonprofit Governance Index Data Report 1 CEO Survey of BoardSource Members

Chapter 2 Public Participation

Air Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Technician Occupation Overview

Keisha Lance Bottoms. Below is the unedited questionnaire response of: Keisha Lance Bottoms Mayoral Candidate

Suffolk University North Carolina October 2016

Workforce Sub-Committee

Transportation. Sustainability Plan Transportation. Help Us Create a Sustainable Lakewood: Work Group Challenge. Topics. Vision

Sustainable Transportation Performance Measures

APA Policy Principles for Autonomous Vehicles

Proposed Performance Indicators for Thrive MSP 2040 For discussion at the December 19, 2012 Committee of the Whole meeting

BECOMING A BOARD MEMBER

Business Partners Survey White/Caucasian Business Partners. Fayette County Public Schools March 1 18, 2016

Transcription:

PHASE III SURVEY REPORT FEBRUARY 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...2 Table 1: Phase III Survey Demographics...3 Figure 1: Respondent Age Distribution...3 Figure 2: Respondent Race/Ethnicity Distribution...4 Figure 3: Respondent Gender Distribution...4 Figure 4: Geographic Distribution of Responses...5 Results...6 Figure 5: 2040 Regional Transportation Vision - Key Words...6 Figure 6: Moderate to High Levels of Support...7 Table 2: Levels of Support Reported for All Plan Components...7 Additional Comments...8 Transit...8 Growth Management...8 Active Modes...9 Managed Lanes...9 THE ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION The Atlanta Region s Plan Online Survey Phase III 1

INTRODUCTION The Atlanta Region s Plan outlines the goals, objectives, policies, investment strategies, and performance metrics that the Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC) will use to guide future developments in transportation, land use, water quality, workforce development, aging and health resources, arts and culture, and more. To introduce the planning process to regional citizens and gather their views and ideas for the future, the ARC conducted three surveys at different stages of The Atlanta Region s Plan development. In 2014, the ARC s first survey asked regional residents to identify and rank the metro area s biggest challenges. More than 8,000 people took part, listing the need for more transportation options as most important. Further details are in ARC s Regional Plan Online Phase 1, a report available from the ARC. The second survey on the subject of transportation options took place in early 2015. Citizens were asked how best to connect the region s job and activity centers and how technology might play a role in their future travel. Almost 6,300 people shared their opinions, with the majority finding that transit connections are essential for growth and that new technologies like teleworking, driverless cars, and demand-responsive transportation are important issues for our future. A summary of results is available in ARC s Phase 2 Survey Report. The final survey, Phase 3, was open from December 7th, 2015 to January 18th, 2016. This phase of the survey presented some of the key plans that were developed out of the planning process and earlier public comments and opinions. More open-ended than previous surveys, respondents were asked for their impressions of these plans and to describe their overall vision for the Atlanta region s transportation in 2040. Over 1,500 citizens evaluated the plan components and provided their thoughts and suggestions. As shown in Table 1 [Figures 1, 2, and 3], survey respondents were primarily white and aged 25 through 65. Though not all respondents provided this information, the racial distribution overall was similar to previous surveys. Males, however, were somewhat overrepresented in this survey compared to the earlier two. Survey responses were submitted from all across the Atlanta region, though they were clustered more in the center and north than in the previous surveys [Figure 4]. The public was informed about the survey through online newsletters, emails, partnerships, social media, public presentations, television, radio, newspaper, blogs, and outreach events. Examples of the notification and marketing materials are in Appendix K of The Atlanta Region s Plan. THE ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION The Atlanta Region s Plan Online Survey Phase III 2

w Table 1: Phase III Survey Demographics Number of Responses Percent of Sample Age 0-18 3 0% 19-24 34 3% 25-34 270 24% 35-44 231 20% 45-54 235 21% 55-64 225 20% 65-74 123 11% 75+ 13 1% Race/ Ethnicity Asian 29 3% Black/African-American 193 17% Hispanic/Latino 25 2% Some other race 15 1% Two or more races 35 3% White/Caucasian 807 73% Gender Female 490 43% Male 641 57% Figure 1: Respondent Age Distribution 0-18 19-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75+ 1% 0% 11% 3% 24% 20% 20% 21% THE ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION The Atlanta Region s Plan Online Survey Phase III 3

Figure 2: Respondent Race/Ethnicity Distribution Asian Black/African-American Hispanic/Latino Some other race Two or more races White/Caucasian 3% 18% 2% 3% 1% 73% Figure 3: Respondent Gender Distribution Female Male 43% 57% THE ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION The Atlanta Region s Plan Online Survey Phase III 4

Figure 4: Geographic Distribution of Responses THE ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION The Atlanta Region s Plan Online Survey Phase III 5

RESULTS The first survey question asked respondents to consider their expectations of the regional transportation system in the year 2040. The visions for the future of Atlanta regional transportation that many survey respondents described share the same themes as the overall survey responses. Transit was a major issue for most residents, the majority of whom see a system of diverse transportation options as a necessity of Atlanta. Figure 5 shows a breakdown of the key words used most in the future transportation vision statements. Figure 5: 2040 Regional Transportation Vision - Key Words The survey next presented four components of The Atlanta Region s Plan: the regional growth policy map, key public transit expansion plans, managed lanes system map, and active transportation investment strategies. Each component was represented graphically and paired with a brief explanation. For each policy, survey takers were asked to rate their level of support for each on a scale from one to five stars. Responses were very positive: a strong majority of respondents reported a moderate or higher level of support for all four components. Individually, the transit and active modes plans received the highest percentages of five star votes, with over 50% of respondents expressing high support for the plans. Levels of support were distributed more evenly in the moderate (3 and 4 stars) ranges for the growth management and managed lanes plans. Table 2 shows the full results for each plan. THE ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION The Atlanta Region s Plan Online Survey Phase III 6

Figure 6: Moderate to High Levels of Support TRANSIT 84% GROWTH MANAGEMENT 83% ACTIVE MODES 79% MANAGED LANES 58% Table 2: Levels of Support Reported for All Plan Components Number of Responses Transit Percent of Sample Number of Responses Percent of Sample Growth Management 5 stars 656 52% 258 19% 4 stars 252 20% 512 38% 3 stars 170 13% 370 27% 2 stars 90 7% 123 9% 1 star 105 8% 101 7% Active Modes Managed Lanes 5 stars 698 55% 214 17% 4 stars 174 14% 241 19% 3 stars 126 10% 256 21% 2 stars 50 4% 162 13% 1 stars 210 17% 370 30% THE ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION The Atlanta Region s Plan Online Survey Phase III 7

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS For each of the four policy outlines that survey takers were asked to review, they were also given the opportunity to share additional comments. TRANSIT - 419 Comments 48% of comments were in support of further expansion of public transit in the region, beyond the plans outlined in the map provided, including requests for increased connections across the planned network and more transit both inside and outside the perimeter. 15% of comments expressed general approval of the public transit plans described. 16% of comments shared specific ideas for transit implementation or policies. 11% of comments were about other topics or the map design itself. 9% of comments were not in support of the transit plans or further transit expansion. GROWTH MANAGEMENT - 314 Comments 37% of comments were specific to the map design, proposing, for example, the addition of other regional centers or questions about how change over time is demonstrated. 22% of comments were in support of limiting further sprawl in the region and encouraging higher density in existing areas. 19% of comments were related to transit issues. 20% of comments were about other topics or specific policy or infrastructure ideas in various areas of the region. 3% of comments were in support of increased outward expansion of the city or against higher density development. THE ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION The Atlanta Region s Plan Online Survey Phase III 8

ACTIVE MODES - 288 Comments 50% of comments were in support of the bike and pedestrian vision presented. 20% of comments supported even further expansion of this vision, suggesting areas for further infrastructure construction and ideas for implementation. 8% of comments shared the opinion that bike and pedestrian infrastructure is primarily recreational and wouldn t decrease congestion, even though it is a good development. 8% of comments expressed general disapproval of the bike and pedestrian vision. 3% of comments stated that this vision was only suited to dense areas. 11% of comments were about other topics or the map design itself. MANAGED LANES - 367 Comments 23% of comments stated a general disapproval of focus on car travel and advocated for more emphasis on alternate modes. 20% of comments were in support of the managed lane plans described. 11% of comments pushed for even further growth of managed lane systems or increased rules for the lanes. 20% of comments supported HOV lanes but not HOT lanes, including concerns about the equity of HOT lanes. 12% of comments did not support the managed lane plans provided. 6% of comments offered specific ideas for the managed lane implementation. 8% of comments were about other topics or the map design itself. THE ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION The Atlanta Region s Plan Online Survey Phase III 9