ScienceDirect. Evaluation for CO2 Geo-Storage Potential and Suitability in Dagang Oilfield

Similar documents
Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 63 (2014 ) GHGT-12

PROGRESS AND PROSPECT OF YANCHANG INTEGRATED CCS DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

New Methods and Technologies in Petroleum Geology, Drilling and reservoir Engineering. June Krynica, Poland

Estimation of CO 2 Storage Capacity

Challenges in the Transition from of CO 2 -EOR to CCS

Feasibility Research of Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Process in Bohai Offshore Heavy Oil Reservoirs

Overview of Capacity Estimation Methodologies for saline reservoirs

Rong Kang 1,2, Jinfeng Ma, 2,3

Geological Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide

Geological Carbon Sequestration

Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) Activities in China

Current Status and Development of CO 2 Geological Utilization and Storage (CGUS) in China

Analogs in Resource Assessment and Beyond

An Experimental Study on Starting Pressure of Low Mobility Oil Reservoir

Assessing the Potential for CO 2 Enhanced Oil Recovery and Storage in Depleted Oil Pools in Southeastern Saskatchewan

Physical Simulation for Water Injection of Horizontal Wells in Naturally Fractured Buried- Hill Reservoirs

Available online at Energy Procedia 1 (2009) (2008) GHGT-9

Could China meet CO2 emission reduction targets by CO2-EOR? Sa d Shannak

ScienceDirect. Study of Lead Rubber Bearings Operation with Varying Height Buildings at Earthquake

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 114 (2017 )

Feasibility study of CO2 free hydrogen chain utilizing Australian brown coal linked with CCS

Indonesia s CCS Storage Availability and Options for CCS Biomass

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 63 (2014 ) GHGT-12. Nader Mosavat a, Farshid Torabi a*

CO 2 Storage in Geological Media

Earthquake Response Analysis of Spherical Tanks with Seismic Isolation

Innovative Zero-emission Coal Gasification Power Generation Project

CO 2 Geological Storage Principles, Applicability in Canada, and Challenges

PROJECT PREPARATORY TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

- Phase III Report - Prepared for: Technical Group (TG) Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum (CSLF)

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 63 (2014 ) GHGT-12

Role of Rock/Fluid Characteristics in Carbon (CO 2 ) Storage and Modeling

Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) in China

Safety and Monitoring of CO 2 Storage Projects

Deep Saline Formations: The Largest Potential Volumes for Geological Storage of CO 2

A New Method to Predict Polymer Flood Performance

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 61 (2014 )

EOR in the US, Success of Gas Injection

Feasibility of Gas Drive in Fang-48 Fault Block Oil Reservoir

RESULTS FROM CSLF-RECOGNIZED PROJECTS: FORT NELSON PROJECT AND ZAMA PROJECT

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 121 (2015 )

Determining the Prospects for CCS in Southeast Asia. Pradeep Tharakan, PhD Energy Specialist (Climate Change)

LoSal EOR into the Clair Ridge Project - Laboratory to Day One Field Implementation

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 91 (2016 )

Collaboration & Knowledge Sharing on Large-scale Demonstration Projects. Xiaoliang Yang, PhD World Resources Institute

COMPARISON FOR OIL RECOVERY BETWEEN WATER AND POLYMER FLOODING IN THE U-THONG OIL FIELD

Storage options 1. Geological storage. CO2 capture and storage Storage options

EVALUATE HORIZONTAL WELL PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE IN HEAVY OIL RESERVOIRS

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 63 (2014 ) GHGT-12

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 114 (2017 )

Newest progress of chemical flooding technique of PetroChina

Development Strategy Research and Practice on Reservoir with Big Gas Cap and Narrow Oil Rim in Bohai Bay

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 63 (2014 ) GHGT-12

Introducing a new smart tool for screening and addressing suitable CCS projects

Available online at ScienceDirect. Physics Procedia 67 (2015 )

International Energy Forum - Global CCS Institute Symposium on Carbon Capture and Storage

The Performance of Polymer Solution Added with Viscosity Stabilizer and the Evaluation of Its Oil Displacement Efficiency in Daqing Oilfield

Impacts of emission reduction target and external costs on provincial natural gas distribution in China

Flood control and safety evaluation of Banqiao reservoir

Optimisation economics for CO 2 Capture and Storage in Central Queensland (Australia)

ScienceDirect. "City Intelligent Energy and Transportation Network Policy" "Based on the Big Data Analysis"

China-Australia capacity building program on the geological storage of carbon dioxide (CAGS)

Flue gas enhanced oil recovery (EOR) as a high efficient development technology for offshore heavy oil in China

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 63 (2014 ) GHGT-12

Regional Characterization

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 78 (2015 )

Influence of Clay Content on Surfactant- Polymer Flooding For an Egyptian Oil Field. Prof. Atef Abdelhady, British University in Egypt

Estimates of CO2 storage capacity in Europe

Approach of using Corn Residue as Alternative Energy Source for Power Production: A Case Study of the Northern Plain Area of Thailand

Publication date June Report no. 013

CO 2 Geological Storage: Research, Development and Deployment (RD&D) Issues

ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY PLANNING FOR THE LUCKEY DITCH FIELD

CO 2 Sinks in Oil/Gas Fields & Aquifers By Zoltán E. Heinemann

CO 2 EOR: A viable option for NCS? 21 October 2015, Stavanger

Effects of Sweep Efficiency and Displacement Efficiency During Chemical Flooding on a Heterogeneous Reservoir *

Feasibility Study of Songao s Low Carbon Town Planning, China

Feasibility of the combination of CO 2 geological storage and saline water development in sedimentary basins of China

Role of Enhanced Oil Recovery in Carbon Sequestration The Weyburn Monitoring Project, a case study

ASPHALTENE PRECIPITATION AND ITS EFFECTS ON CO 2 -ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY (CO 2 -EOR) Yongan (Peter) Gu, Professor, Ph.D., P.Eng.

Carbon Dioxide Capture and Sequestration in Deep Geological Formations

Murphy Oil Company LTD.

CCEP Overview. January Unlocking CCS in the UK

Energy consumption and GHG emission for regional aluminum industry: A case study of Henan province, China

Energy Procedia 4 (2011) Energy Procedia 00 (2010) GHGT-10. Status of CCS Development in Indonesia

Site selection: Technical site selection criteria and information needs

Distributed Storage Capacity Reservations in Microgrid for LV Network Operation

Carbon Dioxide Storage in Geological Media

Challenge and Opportunity for CO2 EOR in China

Case Study of Smart Meter and In-home Display for Residential Behavior Change in Shanghai, China

ARC Energy Trust. Peters & Co Energy Conference CO 2 Challenges and Opportunities in Western Canada

Optimal integrated diesel grid-renewable energy system for hot water devices

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 63 (2014 ) GHGT-12. IEAGHG b

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 154 (2016 )

Time Lapse Seismic for Monitoring in-situ Combustion in a Heavy Oil Field. Mrinal K. Sen and Nimisha Vedanti

CO2 Storage Functional Requirements Impacts by the CO2 Quality

ScienceDirect. Classification Method of Energy Efficiency and CO2 Emission Intensity of Commercial Trucks in China s Road Transport

Impacts of Renewable Energy Quota System on China's Future Power Sector

Monitoring the safety of CO 2 sequestration in Jingbian Field, China

Geologic Storage of CO 2

Thermal Recovery Status and Development Prospect for Heavy Oil in China

Enhancing Global Energy Security, Role of Technology in the Petroleum Sector. Carbon Management in E&P Operations A Way Forward for Sustainable Future

Transcription:

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Energy Procedia 86 (2016 ) 41 46 The 8th Trondheim Conference on CO2 Capture, Transport and Storage Evaluation for CO2 Geo-Storage Potential and Suitability in Dagang Oilfield Wei Yang, Bo Peng*, Mingzhao Wu, Jian Li, Peng Ni Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute, China University of Petroleum, Beijing, 102249, China Abstract Beijing-Tianjin area is one of the most important economic area in China, CO2 emission is also quite large corresponding to the positive economic date in the area. CCUS (Carbon CaptureUtilization and Storage) technology has been considered as one of solution for CO2 emission reduction. Dagang oilfield is in the area and belong to Bohai Bay Basin, most of CO2 sources in the area, such as power plants, steel factories, refineries are located on or closed to Dagang oil field, so Dagang oilfield has been selected as the CO2 sink. In the paper, the evaluation model has been firstly set up, combing with the different methods. Then, the characteristics of Dagang oil field and the sub-oil fields has been evaluated. As there are several sub-oil fields in Dagang oil field, the sub-oil fields data has been collected and analyzed, the properties of the crude oil, such as MMP, have also been tested, the EOR potential for different sub-oil fields has been calculated and compared. One of typical sub-oil fields has been selected for the CO2-EOR (CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery) pilot test. Considering the, Bohai Bay basin s fault systems are complex development and belonging to the earthquake-prone, the risk assessment for CO2-EOR storage in Dagang oil field has also been done. 2016 2015 The The Authors. Authors. Published Published by Elsevier by Elsevier Ltd. This Ltd. is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of the Programme Chair of The 8th Trondheim Conference on CO2 Capture, Transport and Peer-review Storage. under responsibility of the Programme Chair of the 8th Trondheim Conference on CO 2 Capture, Transport and Storage Keywords: Dagang Oil Field; Enhanced Oil Recovery; CO2 Geo-Storage * Corresponding author. Tel.: +861089734903; fax: +861089734903. E-mail address: cbopeng@cup.edu.cn 1876-6102 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of the Programme Chair of the 8th Trondheim Conference on CO 2 Capture, Transport and Storage doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2016.01.005

42 Wei Yang et al. / Energy Procedia 86 ( 2016 ) 41 46 1. Introduction Carbon dioxide capture and storage is a major mitigation strategy for reducing CO2 emission. CO2 storage in oil field is a low-cost means of reducing CO2 emissions, especially the power plant, steel factories and refineries, which can decreased the expense of exploration. Disposing CO2 by CO2-EOR project can significantly reduce the cost due to the incremental oil production. Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei is one of China s key development area and also is one of the most positive economic area. The Carbon dioxide emission will rapidly increase with the development of the economy. Tianjin Lingang IGCC (Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle) power station will construct a CO2 captured demonstration pilot plant with 610 4 t/a, the captured CO2 will be sent to a proper location for sequestration. A favorable option is implementing CO2-EOR project in the oil field because the cost of investment and operation could be covered by the value of incremental produced oil. The power station is adhere to the Dagang oilfield, as shown in Fig 1 [1]. Fig.1 Locations of IGCC plant and distribution of sub-oil fields in Dagang oil field

Wei Yang et al. / Energy Procedia 86 ( 2016 ) 41 46 43 Dagang oil field is an important oil field in china with annually 51010 4 t oil production. Dagang oil field have been developed since 1960s and have been entered middle and late development stages of tertiary oil recovery, such as polymer flooding [1]. In this paper, the CO2 storage potential in oil reservoirs of Dagang oil field was evaluated. Considering the risk assessment for CO2-EOR, The site of CO2-EOR pilot test was finally selected. 2. Methodologies of screening and evaluation criterion All the data used in this study is acquired from published data. Dagang oil field has been developed for many years, so there are many published data which can be used for evaluation of CO2 storage especially CO2-EOR. The Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum (CSLF) has proposed method for calculating the CO2 potential in depleted oil reservoir [2, 3]. This method assumes that CO2 is injected into the depleted reservoir until the reservoir pressure reached to initial reservoir pressure. Pingping Shen has derived the calculation method considering CO2 dissolution in oil and water [3]. M E NB V V CO2 CO2r R O iw pw Where M CO2 is theoretical storage capacity, Mt; ρ CO2 is density of CO 2 in the reservoir,kg/m 3 ; N is original oil in place, 10 9 m 3 ; E R is the oil recovery factor, %; B O is the formation volume factor; V iw is the volume of water injection in reservoir, 10 9 m 3 ; V pw is the volume of production, 10 9 m 3. However, it is difficult to calculate CO2 storage potential use these methods due to the lack of detailed oil production data from Oil Company or other ways. In this paper, the CLSF method was adopted without considering the V iw and V pw. Not all of the reservoirs can be implemented CO2-EOR project considering reservoir characteristics and economic feasibility. In this assessment, the screening criterion proposed by Alireza Jafari was applied [4], as shown in Table 1. This criterion required a few reservoir data such as reservoir depth, temperature, initial pressure, porosity, oil gravity, original oil in place (OOIP), recovery factor (E R) and remaining oil in place (ROIP). All the required data can be easily obtained from published data. Table 1. Criterion for determining the suitability of oil reservoirs for CO2-EOR Reservoir Characteristic Value Depth(m) 350 Temperature() 28 to 121 Pressure >MMP and <Pi Porosity (%) 3, preferably >10 Oil Gravity( API) >27 and 45 Remaining Oil in place (%) 30 Remaining Oil in place(mmbbl) 20 Considering the typical characteristics of oil and reservoir properties in China, Liping He has established a novel equation based on Mungan correlation, which can be used here to predict the minimum pressure (MMP) [5]. The applied equations are as follows: MMP 329.558 (7.727* MW *1.005 T ) (4.377* MW ) 145 8864.9 MW G 1 1.012

44 Wei Yang et al. / Energy Procedia 86 ( 2016 ) 41 46 141.5 G 131.5 r o Where, r o is the relative density; T is the reservoir temperature. In this assessment, the additional CO2 storage potential resulted by the implement CO2-EOR could be calculated using the equation which is proposed by Alireza Jafari [4] : M OOIP R E CO2EOR CO2STD CO2 EXTRA O Where, OOIP is original oil in place, 10 4 t; ρ CO2 is density at standard conditions, kg/m 3 ; E EXTRA is additional incremental recovery factor; R CO2 is the ratio for net CO 2 injection versus additional oil production, m 3 /m 3. The value of ρ CO2 is 1.78kg/m3. Additional incremental recovery factor is assumed to be 4%, 12% and 20% while the ratio for net CO 2 injection versus additional oil production is also assumed to be 534.27, 890.45 and 1424.72 m 3 /m 3 [4, 6]. 3. Description of Dagang Oil field Dagang Oil field locate in Huanghua Depression of Bohai Bay basin comprising 33 small individual sub-fields. Dagang oil field s oil bearing area is 629.2 km 2 with 9361510 4 t OOIP. Through years of development, Dagang oilfield has entered extra high hydrated production later stage, and most blocks are facing the issue of how to improve the development effectiveness. In this paper, 24 main fields were selected for CO2 storage potential calculation and CO2-EOR suability evaluation. The main Oil bearing reservoirs lies in Ordovician, Mesozoic, Paleogene and Neogene are of this area, especially Paleogene and Neogene. Its lithology mainly contains Clastic sandstone, biological limestone and igneous rock. Various faults were developed with in this region and provided favorable for oil and gas accumulation. The distribution and relations of water, oil and gas is very complex [1]. 4. CO2 storage capacity in depleted oil fields in Dagang Oil field In the paper, 24 oil fields were selected for CO2 storage capacity assessment within Dagang oil field 33 small fields according to the richness of acquired information. The total theoretical storage capacity of these fields was calculated as 156Mt, as shown in Table 2 [7]. Table 2 Summary data and CO2 storage capacity in 24 sub-oil fields of Dagang oil field Oil field Discovery years OOIP 10 4 t CO2 Storage Capacity Mt Zaoyuan 1971 13364 17.06 Wangguantun 1971 11092.96 17.62 Banqiao 1973 4170.8 15.26 Gangxi 1965 7543 11.05 Gangdong 1965 6000.1 20.70 Tangjiahe 1966 3831.61 8.56 Yangsanmu 1964 3031 4.46 Shenvsi 1984 2912 4.86 Gangzhong 1972 2676 5.30 Xiaoji 1975 3324 9.81 Wangxuzhuang 1966 2583.22 8.07 Yangerzhuang 1974 2329.87 6.53 Kongdian 1972 2287 2.44 Madong 1978 439 1.29 zhangjuhe 1981 1850.46 3.31 Zhouqingzhuang 1966 1676.38 2.03

Wei Yang et al. / Energy Procedia 86 ( 2016 ) 41 46 45 Continued Table 2 Summary data and CO2 storage capacity in 24 sub-oil fields of Dagang oil field Oil field Discovery years OOIP 10 4 t CO2 Storage Capacity Mt Changlu 1984 1322 3.20 Liujianfang 1970 1140 1.78 Duanliuba 1983 1017 1.92 Maxi 1978 678 4.74 Lianmeng 1986 521 1.52 Koucun 1988 408 0.45 Wumaying 1982 289 0.32 Yesanba 1984 1290.93 4.35 Total 75777.33 156.32 5. CO2-EOR storage capacity in Dagang Oil field 24 sub-oil fields of dagang oil field were chosen for CO2-EOR assessment based on the criterion (Table 1). Of all the evaluated oil fields, three fields MMP are higher than the oil reservoir pressure and four oil fields temperature is higher than 120. Finally, considering the depth, porosity, oil gravity and remaining oil in place, only 9 oil fields are suitable for CO2-EOR. According different value of E EXTRA and R CO2, the additional incremental oil production and CO2-EOR storage capacity were calculated, as shown in Table 3. Table 3 Incremental oil production and CO2 storage potential in the sub-oil fields suitable for CO2-EOR oil field Incremental oil production by EOR (10 4 t) Additional CO2 storage potential(mt) E EXTRA=4% E EXTRA=12% E EXTRA=20% R CO2=534.27 m 3 /m 3 R CO2=890.45 m 3 /m 3 R CO2=1424.72 m 3 /m 3 Banqiao 166.83 500.5 836.16 1.87 5.62 9.38 3.12 9.36 15.64 4.99 14.98 25.02 Tangjiahe 153.26 459.79 766.32 1.72 5.16 8.59 2.86 8.59 14.32 4.58 13.75 22.92 Gangzhong 107.04 321.12 535.2 1.19 3.58 5.97 1.99 5.97 9.94 3.18 9.55 15.91 Xiaoji 132.96 398.88 664.8 1.44 4.31 7.18 2.39 7.18 11.97 3.83 11.50 19.16 Wangxuzhuang 103.33 309.99 516.64 1.13 3.39 5.65 1.88 5.65 9.41 3.01 9.04 15.06 Zhangjuhe 74.02 222.06 370.09 0.84 2.51 4.19 1.40 4.19 6.98 2.23 6.70 11.17 Zhouqingzhuang 67.06 201.17 335.28 0.75 2.24 3.74 1.25 3.74 6.23 1.99 5.98 9.96 Duanliuba 40.68 122.04 203.4 0.44 1.33 2.22 0.74 2.22 3.71 1.19 3.56 5.93 Yesanba 51.64 154.91 258.19 0.56 1.69 2.82 0.94 2.82 4.70 1.51 4.52 7.53 Total 896.82 2690.46 4486.08 9.94 29.83 49.75 16.57 49.72 82.91 26.52 79.56 132.66 The total incremental oil production caused by implementing CO2-EOR in Dagang oil field is among 896.82 10 4 t~4486.0810 4 t evaluated by different recovery factor. Using different ratio for net CO 2 injection versus additional oil production, the additional CO2 storage potential is in the range of 9.94Mt to 132.66Mt combining different recovery factor. 6. Pilot test site selection and Risk assessment In the early operation period of the CO2-EOR demonstration project, liquefied CO2 is transported by tank truck. Less distance between the IGCC plant not only reduced the cost of CO2 transportation but also the risk of leakage. Of all the 9 suitable CO2 flooding oil fields, Banqiao oilfield is the nearest and Gangzhong is the second. But the adverse effect of the selection is that it also near the population centers, such as Tianjin and Tanggu. So risk assessment of the CO2-EOR project is necessary.

46 Wei Yang et al. / Energy Procedia 86 ( 2016 ) 41 46 According to China ground motion peak acceleration zoning map, the site is regionally stable with ground motion peak acceleration of 0.05-0.1g [8]. There is no earthquake with magnitude more than 5 in this site based on history data [9]. In Banqiao oil field, faults are well developed and the well-developed faults cut it into several blocks. The faults have good sealing characteristics because there were no leakage of oil and gas reported. And so the operation of the CO2-EOR demonstration project is safe during its life span. 7. Conclusion In this study, the assessment of CO2 storage potential, the suitability and capacity of CO2-EOR was evaluated in Dagang oil fields 24 sub-oil fields based on the evaluation and screening criterion. Finally the site of CO2-EOR pilot test was selected combing risk assessment. The abovementioned results showed that only 9 sub-oil fields are suitable for CO2-EOR of all the evaluated fields. The most reasons for the fields are unsuitable for CO2-EOR are the high reservoir temperature, low oil API and high viscosity. The total CO2 storage capacity in depleted oil fields is 156.32 Mt whereas the maximum CO2-EOR storage capacity is 132.66 Mt. It shows that the implement of CO2-EOR can significantly increase the amount of CO2 stored in the underground. Though the amount of the 24 main sub-oil fields CO2 storage capacity is about 156.32 Mt, it unevenly distribute into 24 sub-oil fields in the range from 0.32Mt to 17.62 Mt. According to the assessment, Banqiao field was chosen for CO2-EOR pilot test site considering the distance between CO2 emission source and the selected site. The preliminary risk assessment proved that the CO2-EOR project is safe during its life span, but detailed monitoring plan is needed to be done. Due to the restriction of regional assessment, some zones belonging to sub-oil fields which were screened out for CO2-EOR may be suitable for CO2-EOR, such as some zones of Gangdong. More detailed assessment would be carried out in the following work. Acknowledgements The study is funded by The National High Technology Research and Development Program of China- The key technologies of CO2 Flooding and System Development (2011AA050603) and administered by the Ministry of Science and Technology. References [1] Compilation Committee of China's Development. China's oil and gas field development (Volume of Dagang Oil and Gas Province). Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press; 2011.p.3-65 [2] Bachu S., Bonijoly D., Bradshaw J., et al. Estimation of CO2 Storage Capacity in Geological Media - Phase 2. Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum (CSLF); 2007 [3] Pingping S., Xinwei L. The Technology of Carbon Dioxide Stored in Geological Media and Enhanced Oil Recovery. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press; 2009.p.43-58 [4] Jafari A., Bachu S. Evaluation of CO 2 storage capacity in Devonian hydrocarbon reservoirs for emissions from oil sands operations in the Athabasca area, Canada. Energy Procedia 2014; 63:5222-30 [5] He L., Shen P., Liao X., et al. Potential evaluation of CO 2 EOR and sequestration in Yanchang oilfield. Journal of the Energy Institute 2015; [6] Goodyear S. G., Hawkyard I. R., Masters J., et al. Subsurface issues for CO 2 flooding of UKCS reservoirs. Chemical engineering research and design 2003; 81(3):315-325 [7] Compilation Committee of China's Development. China's oil and gas field development (Volume of Dagang Oil and Gas Province). Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press; 2011.p.1-1522 [8] Administration C. E. China ground motion peak acceleration zoning map. Beijing: Standards press of china; 2001 [9] Pengfei W., Cuifen Z. Neotectonic Zoning and Seismic Activity in Tianjin New Costal Area. North China Earthquake Sciences 1999; (02):52-8