How to Collect Your Water Sample and Interpret the Results for the Livestock Analytical Package

Similar documents
How to Collect Your Water Sample and Interpret the Results for the Poultry Analytical Package

How to Collect Your Water Sample and Interpret the Results for the Irrigation Analytical Package

How to Collect Your Water Sample and Interpret the Results for the Fish Pond Analytical Package

Interpretive Guide & Summary Statistics

Farm Water Quality Considerations

Water Quality. CE 370 Lecture 1. Global Distribution of Earth s s Water

Understanding Your Test Results

Chemical Testing of Drinking Water

Know What You re Monitoring! Since not all of us are water chemists, here is a brief understanding of what your different tools measure

Evaluation copy. Total Dissolved Solids. Computer INTRODUCTION

Pebble Project Surface Water Quality Program Streams, Seeps, and Ponds

National Science Content Standards: A: Science as Inquiry E: Science and Technology

Total Dissolved Solids

Understanding Nutrients and Their Affects on the Environment

Drinking Water Quality


Discipline Chemical Testing Issue Date Certificate Number T-3553 Valid Until Last Amended on - Page 1 of 9

Easy Well Water Test Kit Pro with Bacteria, lead and Pesticide Instructions

Drinking Water Supply and

EPA Primary. (mg/l as CaCO3) (mg/l as CaCO3)

Interpreting Irrigation Water Quality Reports

Lake Huron Water Treatment Plant Mineral Report

IRON, MANGANESE AND HYDROGEN SULFIDE IN PRIVATE WATER SUPPLIES

RECOMMENDED SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION (For Testing Laboratories) * Test Method / Standard against which tests are performed

Results from the 2017 Water Quality Monitoring Program

Lake Huron Water Treatment Plant Mineral Report

Detroit Water and Sewerage Department Water Quality Division Laboratory Analysis of Water Samples Collected at Lake Huron Plant 10/14/2014

Drinking Water Education Program

Detroit Water and Sewerage Department Water Quality Division Laboratory Analysis of Water Samples Collected at Lake Huron Plant 6/9/2015

Drinking Water Education

Superintendence Company of India Private Limited, Plot Y-23, Block-EP, Sector-V, Salt Lake City, Kolkata, West Bengal

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Bringing the University to You

INTRODUCTION: WHERE DOES OUR WATER COME FROM?

Lecture 1: Introduction

With High Fertilizer Prices. Gerald Bryan Extension Agronomist UM Extension Jackson, MO

Interpreting Soils tests to build active soils w/cover crops

Non-Detects (ND) - laboratory analysis indicates that the constituent is not present.

Chemical Parameter Analysis for Water, Waste Water and Ground Water

Adapted from: An original Creek Connections activity. Creek Connections, Box 10, Allegheny College, Meadville, Pennsylvania

Soil Testing and Nutrient Management. Craig Cogger Soil Scientist WSU Puyallup

Wilbur-Ellis Company. Carl Bruice - National Nutrition Technical Manager

Salinity in the Central Valley

The Snapshot CONODOGUINET CREEK WATERSHED SNAPSHOT

CITY OF ST. LOUIS Water Quality Report 2016

MAVEA Professional. Basics on water

MONITORING THE SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF NUTRIENTS ON C&H FARM IN BIG CREEK WATERSHED

Ground Water & UST Samples: Containers, Preservation and Hold Times Table

Water Pollution & Quality. Dr. Deniz AKGÜL Marmara University Department of Environmental Engineering

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report

Earth s Pools of Water What is the residence time of these pools?

The key parameters for aquaria and ponds are: acidity (ph), hardness (KH and GH), and products of decomposition (NO2 and NO3).

(1) The Hydrologic Cycle

Middlefield Village Water Department Drinking Water Consumer Confidence Report 2016

2012 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report Town of Chadbourn Water System Number:

INTRODUCTION. Building Services County Office Building 197 Main Street Cooperstown, New York Phone: (607) Fax: (607)

Water Chemistry. Water 101

Identify and Correct Impact of Water Health Challenges Associated with Flooding. Susan Watkins and Mike Daniels

Upper Greenwood Lake School (PWSID#: NJ ) 41 Henry Road, West Milford, NJ Year 2013 Annual Water Quality Report

Recirculating Hot Water Systems

Common Well Problems. Common Well Problems. Well Forensics. Difficult Well Problems May Require Well Forensics 12/11/2017

2017 Consumer Confidence Report (CCR)

Water treatment. Why do we need to clean our water? Diseases carried by unclean water. Did you know? Did you know?

2015 Water Quality Report. Kona Water (Kukio) District

Calculating Crop Nutrient Value From Irrigation Water Inputs: A Survey of Southeast Missouri Irrigation

W12A Landfill Groundwater, Leachate, Water Well, Landfill Gas and Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program

Water Pollution. Objective: Name, describe, and cite examples of the eight major types of water pollution.

Statewide Characterization of Oklahoma s Major Aquifers

Water Pollution. Chapter 20

SWANA 2017 Leachate Basics and Quality Changes with Organics Removal. Steve Johnson M.Eng., P.Eng.

Water Quality Guidelines for Turkeys

Alkalinity: An Important Parameter in Assessing Water Chemistry

Asset management begins with correct water treatment

Santa Rosa Creek Water Quality Results 2004

2015 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report Wells College Water Department PO Box 500 Aurora, NY (Public Water Supply ID# )

City of Redding Water Utility 2006 Consumer Confidence Report

City of Bayfield Utility 2009 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report

Subject Index. See for options on how to legitimately share published articles.

Drinking water : Systems & Quality. March 13 th 2015 Paulien Rutten

Surface Water Samples: Containers, Preservation and Hold Times Table

Hardness Evidence Search

Village of Bridgeport. Consumer Confidence Report

Village of McBride Annual Water System Report

Modeling Land Application of. in the Central Valley, CA

2017 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report Pasco County Utilities - Florida Estates Service Area PWS ID No

Method (0.1 to 8.0 mg/l Cu) TNTplus 860

Water Quality Consists of these Eight Important Components:

Biological and Chemical Characteristics of Groundwater in a Rural Settlement Area of Davao Oriental

Drinking. Water Rules

Environmental Services

Water Quality Treatment Policies January 28, 2015

Asset management begins with correct water treatment

WATER QUALITY REPORT

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR GENERAL WTP REQUESTED DATA FOR THE WATER TREATMENT PLANT (WTP) - Application : groundwater (well pit); urban wastewater;

2016 Consumer Confidence Report

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report for 2016 City of Taneytown

2016 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report Naval Air Station Pensacola/Corry

Acidity and Alkalinity:

METHOD #: Approved for NPDES (Issued 1971) Oxygen, Dissolved (Modified Winkler, Full-Bottle Technique) ANALYTE: CAS # O Oxygen

HYDROGEOCHEMISTRY AND TREATMENT OF ACID MINE DRAINAGE IN SOUTHERN CHINA' by Guo Fang2 and Yu Hong 2

For more information regarding this report contact: Jim Keenan, Chairperson, Water and Sewer Committee, or

Transcription:

How to Collect Your Water Sample and Interpret the Results for the Livestock Analytical Package Bradley J. Austin, Dirk Philipp, Mike Daniels, and Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture FS-2016-03 November 2016 1

How to Collect Your Water Sample and Interpret the Results for the Livestock Analytical Package Bradley J. Austin, Dirk Philipp, Mike Daniels, and Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture A plentiful supply of clean water is crucial for livestock health and productivity. To determine the quality of your livestock s water resources, periodic sampling and analysis is needed. The Arkansas Water Resources Center (AWRC) in cooperation with the UA Cooperative Extension Service offers several analytical packages to assess the quality of your water resources. This document is intended to provide guidance to livestock owners on collecting water samples for analysis and understanding the results on your report provided by the AWRC s Water Quality Laboratory (Lab). The information contained within this fact sheet should be used as general guidance, and the reader is encouraged to seek advice from Extension specialists regarding the interpretation of individual reports and water testing results that may be of concern. Why Should You Have Your Livestock s Water Tested? The quality of groundwater sources should not vary much over time, but groundwater may vary between wells, even if they are close in proximity. Water quality of surface waters (streams and ponds) can and often do vary seasonally with highest quality in winter and poorest quality in the summer (Gadberry 2013). Shallow groundwater and surface waters may be contaminated by agricultural application of fertilizers and pesticides (Gadberry 2013). Water resources should be tested if you suspect poor water quality is contributing to decreased livestock production. New resources, such as drilling a new well for groundwater, should be tested before use. Water resources should be tested periodically to ensure good water quality for livestock consumption. 2

Collecting and Submitting Samples to the AWRC The AWRC Water Quality Lab requires 0.5 liters (roughly half a quart) to measure all of the parameters included in the livestock analytical package. You should properly label a clean sample bottle with your site information; clean bottles can be obtained from the AWRC Water Quality Lab or from your local extension office, if needed. If your primary water source is a pond, find a sampling location that is devoid of debris, mud, and or algae in surface films, being careful not to stir up the sediments. In streams, water samples should be collected from the area with the fastest moving water; this area is the most thoroughly mixed and representative of the overall stream water quality. Additionally, to avoid potential contamination, water samples should be collected while you re facing upstream, as the water is moving toward you.. Prior to sample collection, the sample bottle should be field-rinsed three times. To do this, fill the sample bottle approximately ¼ full, cap and shake, and then discard the rinse water away from the location that the sample will be collected. Once field-rinsed, the sample bottle should be inverted and then submerged into the water ½ foot below the water surface and then turned upright to allow water to flow into the bottle. If multiple water sources are used for your livestock, each source should be tested separately. When submitting multiple samples, make sure to properly label each sample bottle so that they can be distinguished from one another. Water samples should be kept cool, preferably on ice and out of the sun, and submitted to the AWRC Water Quality Lab as soon as possible. If possible, reduce delays during shipping and avoid submitting samples at times when they will reach the Lab on a holiday or weekend, as the concentrations of the variables in this analysis package may change over time in unpreserved water samples. For the most reliable results, water samples should be kept cool, in the dark, and delivered to the AWRC Water Quality Lab as soon as possible. 3

Interpreting Results Table 1 provides a list of acceptable concentrations for each of the parameters analyzed in the livestock water quality analytical package. It summarizes data for beef and dairy cattle, and swine. The values listed are acceptable for all ages of each form of livestock. In the descriptions below, specific holding times are listed for each parameter. Many of the parameters are stable for 14 days to 6 months once they have been filtered and preserved by the Lab. A list of holding times or the amount of time the Lab has to analyze the water sample is provided in Table 1. It is recommended that you submit your water samples to the water quality lab as soon as possible and keep them stored on ice until delivery to help ensure accuracy of the variables measured. The AWRC Water Quality Lab generally completes the analysis of your water sample within two weeks, returning results within three to four weeks. Below are some general guidelines in determining if the parameters tested in your water sample are acceptable for consumption by your livestock. Specific values of maximum acceptable concentrations for daily consumption are provided in Table 1. Table 1: Recommended limits for the parameters measured in the livestock analytical package based on the primary livestock produced in Arkansas. The listed values represent either the range or the maximum concentration that s safe for daily consumption by livestock. Parameter Beef Dairy Swine Sample Preservation Holding Time (days) ph 5.5 8.0 6.0 8.0 6.5 8.5 None 2 Arsenic (mg/l) <0.2 <0.05 <0.2* Filter/Acidify 180 Calcium (mg/l) < 500 <500 < 1000 Filter/Acidify 180 Magnesium (mg/l) < 250 <250 <250 Filter/Acidify 180 Sodium (mg/l) < 1000 <1000 < 1000 Filter/Acidify 180 Copper (mg/l) <1.0 < 1.0 < 0.5 Filter/Acidify 180 Iron (mg/l) <2.0 <2.0 <0.2 Filter/Acidify 180 Manganese (mg/l) <0.05 <0.05 <1.0 Filter/Acidify 180 Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l) < 2500 < 1000 < 3000 None 7 Conductivity (µs/cm) < 1500 < 1500 < 1500 None 28 Fluoride (mg/l) < 2.0 < 2.0 2.0 3.0 None 28 Chloride (mg/l) < 1500 <1500 < 250 None 28 Sulfate (mg/l) < 500 < 500 < 1000 None 28 Nitrate-Nitrogen (mg/l) < 68* < 22 < 68* None 2 Symbols next to specific headers denote primary source for values listed under that category of livestock, symbols next to individual values denotes the source for that specific value. : Gadberry 2013, FAS3021; : Looper 2013, FAS4021; : van Heugten, ANS00-811s; *: CAST 1974, Report No. 26 : Spectrum Analytic (access date 11-16-2015) 4

1 ph: This is a measure of how acidic (values less than 7) or basic (values greater than 7) a water sample is. The acceptable range for most livestock is between 5.5 and 8.5. Several problems may arise when the ph is outside of this range. Excessively low ph may corrode water delivery systems leading to contamination of the water with metals such as iron, copper, and lead. Waters with a ph outside of the desirable range may also result in digestive upset, diarrhea, and decreased feed and water intake. Samples should be analyzed within 48 hours of collection for the most accurate results (Table 1). 2Arsenic (As): Arsenic enters water bodies through the erosion and weathering of soil, minerals, and ores, and atmospheric deposition through the burning of fossil fuels. Drinking water concentrations less than 0.2 mg/l are generally acceptable for most livestock. However, total intake of arsenic from all dietary sources should be taken into consideration. Once your water sample is processed and preserved in the laboratory it is stable for 6 months. 3Calcium (Ca): Calcium is naturally occurring in most water sources and it can come from dissolved rock such as limestone and gypsum. High concentrations of calcium along with magnesium relate to hard water which can result in scale formation in your water delivery system, thereby decreasing function. Calcium concentrations less than 500 mg/l are acceptable for cattle, while swine can handle concentrations up to 1000 mg/l. Once your water sample is processed and preserved in the laboratory it is stable for 6 months. 4Magnesium (Mg): Similar to calcium, magnesium is naturally occurring in most water sources and comes from dissolved rock such as dolomite. Magnesium also relates to hard water which can result in scale formation in water delivery systems. Concentrations less than 125 mg/l are generally safe for your livestock; however, concentrations as low as 50 mg/l may cause diarrhea if sulfate is high. Once your sample is processed and preserved in the laboratory it is stable for 6 months. 5Sodium (Na): Usually found in association with chloride, sodium occurs in water from the dissolving of rock and salts. Concentrations of less than 1000 mg/l are acceptable for both cattle and swine. Lower concentrations may be needed if both chloride and sulfate are also present in higher concentrations. Once your sample is processed and preserved in the laboratory it is stable for 6 months. 6Copper (Cu): Acceptable concentrations for copper in the water supply for livestock range from less than 0.5 mg/l for swine to as high as 1 mg/l for cattle. Higher concentrations may produce a bitter flavor which can reduce water intake and decrease animal production. One potential source of elevated copper is from the water delivery system if copper pipe is used and the water source has a low ph. Once your sample is processed and preserved in the laboratory it is stable for 6 months. 7 Iron (Fe): The water sample is analyzed for concentrations of total dissolved iron and will not distinguish between unoxidized (ferrous) and oxidized (ferric) forms. Iron concentrations of up to 2.0 mg/l for beef and dairy cattle and 0.2 mg/l for other livestock should not be harmful for consumption. Once the water sample is processed and preserved by the laboratory, the holding time for analysis is 6 months. 5

8Manganese (Mn): Concentrations of total dissolved manganese less than 0.05 mg/l are not harmful to livestock. Once the water sample is processed and preserved by the laboratory, the holding time for analysis is 6 months. 9Total Dissolved Solids (TDS): This is a general term defining the sum of all inorganic matter dissolved in water. The acceptable level of TDS for all livestock is less than 1000 mg/l, though maximum safe concentrations vary between cattle and swine. Concentrations above 3000 mg/l can cause diarrhea, and above 7000 mg/l water becomes unsuitable for animal consumption over extended periods of time. TDS should be analyzed in water samples within 7 days after collection. 10 Conductivity: Conductivity is related to the salt content or the amount of dissolved ions in the water sample and it is a measure of how well water conducts electricity. In general conductivity less than 1500 µs/cm is relatively high quality for most livestock. Increasing above this point may cause diarrhea until the animals become accustomed to the change. With even higher values (> 8000 µs/cm), water becomes unsuitable for animal consumption over extended periods of time. Conductivity is stable in water sample for up to 28 days after collection. 11 Fluoride (F): Fluoride is a naturally occurring trace element found in surface and ground waters, generally occurring in concentrations ranging from 0.1 1.5 mg/l. Acceptable concentrations for livestock range from less than 2.0 mg/l to 3.0 mg/l. Fluoride concentrations are stable in your water sample for up to 28 days after collection. 12 Chloride (Cl): Chloride should not be confused with chlorine (Cl ) which is a highly 2 reactive compound, often used by drinking water treatment plants as a disinfectant. Chloride is part of common salt (sodium chloride) and occurs naturally in surface and ground water sources due to the dissolving of rock. Acceptable concentrations of chloride in water sources for livestock ranges from less than 250 mg/l for swine to as high as 1500 mg/l for cattle. Chloride concentrations are stable in water samples for up to 28 days after collection. 13 Sulfate (SO ): Sulfate is a naturally occurring compound in surface and ground waters 4 ranging in concentration from 0 1000 mg/l. Cattle and swine can handle concentrations between 500 1000 mg/l. Higher concentrations for all livestock will have a laxative effect; 14 Nitrate-Nitrogen (NO 3 -N): Nitrate is presented in the report as NO 3 -N which is the concentration of nitrogen in the sample in the form of nitrate. Nitrate is not in itself very toxic to animals; however, excessively high nitrate concentrations (>68 mg/l NO 3 -N) tend to cooccur with an accumulation of nitrite (NO 2 ) which is toxic to livestock. Nitrite decreases the blood s ability to carry oxygen. Healthy adult cattle and swine can handle concentrations as high as 68 mg/l of NO 3 -N, while for juvenile animals concentrations should be less than 10 mg/l of NO 3 -N. Nitrate should be analyzed within 48 hours of water sample(s) being collected. 6

Protecting Water Quality For Livestock Consumption While the intended purpose of this fact sheet is to provide guidance in understanding the livestock water quality report there are some simple precautions you can take to help maintain good water quality for your livestock. If ponds and streams are used as a water source for your livestock, keep the animals out of their water source (Gadberry 2013). Animals can contaminate their water source with manure and urine. Fence off ponds and streams and use a secondary watering tank that is filled by the water source. Don t over-apply fertilizers and pesticides to your pastures. Over application or improper application of fertilizers and pesticides can result in an increase of nutrients and harmful chemicals running off into nearby streams and seeping into shallow groundwater sources. This may alter the quality of water available for livestock s consumption. Avoid using water supplies that drain adjacent crop agricultural fields, especially if over application of fertilizers and pesticides is an issue. Keeping livestock out of their water source will help maintain good water quality. Summary Having a reliable water source with good water quality is integral for livestock health and production. Testing water resources regularly can help ensure that you are providing your livestock with clean water and can help detect problems before they negatively impact your animals. This fact sheet is intended to provide information on acceptable concentrations of various elements and compounds for livestock consumption. If the water is being used for additional purposes, such as crop irrigation, it is important to take into consideration the recommended concentrations for the other intended purposes when managing your water resources. If you have specific questions regarding how your water quality may influence your livestock please contact either Dr. Mike Daniels or Dr. Dirk Philipp, with the University Of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service (mdaniels@uaex.edu or dphilipp@uark.edu). 7

Literature Cited Council of Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST). 1974. Quality of Water for Livestock. Report No. 26. Gadberry, S. 2013. Water for Beef Cattle. FSA3021. University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture Research and Extension. Looper, M.L. 2013. Quantity and Quality of Water for Dairy Cattle. FSA4021. University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture Research and Extension. Spectrum Analytic. Interpretation of Water Analysis for Livestock Suitability. http://www.spectrumanalytic.com/ support/library/ff/interpretation_of_water_analysis_for_livestock_suitability.htm. Access Date 11-16-2015. Van Heugten, E. Guidelines for Water Quality in Pigs. ANS00-811S. North Carolina State University, Animal Science Facts, Extension Swine Husbandry. How to Cite This Fact Sheet: Austin, B.J., D. Philipp, M. Daniels, and B.E. Haggard. 2016. How to Collect Your Water Sample and Interpret the Results for the Livestock Analytical Package. Arkansas Water Resources Center, Fayetteville, AR, FS-2016-03: 8 pp. Arkansas Water Resources Center 479.575.4430 awrc@uark.edu College of Engineering 203 Engineering Hall University of Arkansas Fayetteville, AR 72701 8