ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Similar documents
Appendix K. Environmental Noise Assessment

Noise Assessment Report

Guelph Curling Club Development Traffic Noise Impact Study

Noise Assessment Report Main Street, Residential Site Cambridge, ON

Noise Feasibility Study EMGO (North Oakville I) Ltd., Town of Oakville, Ontario

Noise Assessment Report Riverside Drive Phase I

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber House 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development, 361 Tanbark Road Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario

Place Vanier Édifice AEFO

DCR Phoenix. Type of Document 1st Submission. Project Name 256 Rideau Street Ottawa, Ontario. Project Number OTT A0. Prepared By: Nicole Ruyf

Noise Feasibility Study, McGibbon Condominium 71 Main Street South Georgetown, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Building 103 Dundas Street West Oakville, Ontario

Noise Assessment & Control Transportation Noise Assessment 303 Lebreton Street South, 460 St. Laurent Boulevard Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Stacked Townhouse Development Glenashton Drive (Block 55) Oakville, Ontario

Stationary Noise Assessment. 70 Richmond Road. Ottawa, Ontario

Traffic Noise Assessment Baseline Road Ottawa, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Brock Road Pickering, Ontario

APPENDIX I. Environmental Noise Assessment Reports

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Hospice 2050 University Avenue East, Waterloo, Ontario

Fayez & Patrizia Ghadban

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT RIVERSIDE SOUTH PHASE 9-4 CITY OF OTTAWA

Tri-County Aggregates Ltd. 92 Kenhar Drive North York, Ontario, Canada M9L 1N2

Table of Contents. 174 Forward Avenue SACL Project #B7-170 Feb 22, Page ii

Noise Assessment Report

Noise Control Study. for. Avalon Public School Portobello Boulevard at Stormwind Avenue in Ottawa, Ontario. Revision 1

REP Fotenn Bank Phase 1 Feasibility Noise Study with Building Component AmendmentPage 1 of 21

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Ironwood Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise & Vibration Assessment Scott Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Noise Control Feasibility Study 173 / 175 / 177 Preston Street Ottawa, Ontario

Noise Assessment Report

Table of Contents... ii 1. Introduction... 1

NOISE CONTROL STUDY FOR PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND...

Attachment A: Background Noise Assessment for Brandon Thermal Generating Station

Traffic Noise Assessment. 5 Orchard Drive. Stittsville, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise and Vibration Assessment. The Bridge Wesleyan Church Addition. Ottawa, Ontario

671 Victoria Road North City of Guelph Traffic Noise Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 12 HAMILTON AVENUE NORTH OTTAWA, ON.

Noise Feasibility Study Framgard Apartments (South Block) NW corner of Britannia Road and Regional Road 25 Town of Milton, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario

Environmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 92 Plains Road East

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Noise Feasibility Study 2120 Hurontario Street and Grange Drive City of Mississauga, Ontario

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Brigil Homes. Noise Impact Assessment. Type of Document Site Plan Submission. Project Name Petrie s Landing, Phase 2. Project Number OTT A0

Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment Chapel Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Appendix F: Noise Report

APPENDIX 'G' Noise Attenuation Analysis

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed 4 Storey Apartment Building 226 Woolwich Street South Breslau, Regional Municipality of Waterloo

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 47 HAVELOCK STREET OTTAWA, ON.

Appendix M. Noise Assessment

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Stacked Townhouse Development, 3060 and 3072 Sixth Line, Town of Oakville, Ontario

Prepared for: Gapatas Inc Sherwoodtowne Boulevard, Unit 106 Mississauga, ON L4Z 1Y5. Our File No:

DETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY OF PROPOSED PHASE 2 CONDOMINIUMS AT 655 & 755 ANAND PRIVATE OTTAWA Ontario Inc.

Avalon Encore Stage Tenth Line Road Infusion Terrace, Block 233 City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Impact Assessment

Noise Feasibility Study 2480 Old Bronte Road, Oakville, Ontario

Environmental Noise Assessment Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario

ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED PLANTAGENET ASPHALT PLANT

Traffic Noise Assessment. 333 Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 47 HAVELOCK STREET OTTAWA, ON. REVISED with ADDENDUM for ROOFTOP OUTDOOR LIVING AREA

18 McArthur Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario Proposed Development Noise Study Report. Prepared for: Takyan Consulting By: ARCH-Nova Design Inc.

Mann Avenue Development 87 Mann Avenue Noise Control Study

R. BOUWMEESTER & ASSOCIATES

Proposed Residential/Institutional Development Independent and Assisted Care Senior s Residence 190 Richmond Road Ottawa, ON K1Z 6W6

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT RIVERSIDE SOUTH PHASE 13 CITY OF OTTAWA

MINTO COMMUNITIES INC GREENBANK ROAD NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY

UAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Hotel Development, Living Waters Resort Collingwood, Ontario

1. Introduction Site Noise Impact... 1

Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed 6-storey Seniors Condominium 7480 Derry Road West Milton, Ontario

ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ON THE PROPOSED AVALON CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Kemsley Farm St. Thomas, Ontario

Draft Noise Abatement Guidelines

TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT 20 MARK AVENUE

23, 33 & 39 DEERFOX DRIVE NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY

Noise Abatement Guidelines. Regional Official Plan Guidelines

ASSESSMENT OF THE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS AT THE PROPOSED HOLIDAY INN DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE

NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY. MINTO COMMUNITIES INC. Clarke Lands CITY OF OTTAWA

Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study 1 and 15 Stevenson St & 8 William St Guelph, Ontario

SS WILSON ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

The anticipated critical noise receptors and their locations are identified as follows and are shown on Figure 3:

Noise Control Study. Proposed Mixed-use Development. 112 Montreal Road City of Ottawa. Prepared for: DCR Phoenix Developments

3.5.1 Outdoor Living Areas (OLAs) Indoor Sound Levels... 8

Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario

Burnett Lands Greenbank Road. Noise Impact Feasibility Report

ASSESSMENT OF THE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS AT THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 364 ST. PATRICK STREET

APPENDIX D EXISTING ROADWAY NOISE, AIR QUALITY AND GROUND VIBRATION ANALYSIS

NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT MCGANN 9a LANDS BANK STREET LEITRIM DEVELOPMENT AREA

DRAFT REPORT. Boyne East Catholic Secondary School #3CSS. Noise Impact Study. Louis St. Laurent Avenue, Milton. SACL #SW18060A0 December 11, 2018

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 1208 OLD MONTREAL ROAD

Policy for the Assessment and Mitigation of Traffic Noise on County Roads

Environmental Noise Assessment 1020, 1024, 1028, 1032 & 1042 Sixth Line Oakville, ON

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION. Environmental Guide for Noise

Rail Traffic Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Proposed Zone Change for 6 Residential Lots Inkerman Street Guelph, Ontario

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT CLARIDGE HOMES MAPLE GROVE LANDS 1981 MAPLE GROVE ROAD KANATA WEST

Transcription:

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD BETWEEN POPLAR AVENUE AND MAPLE AVENUE TOWN OF AJAX PREPARED FOR: TMIG February 2017 Y1610

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 ENVIRONMETAL NOISE GUIDELINES... 2 3.0 NOISE SENSITIVE AREAS... 3 4.0 NOISE ASSESSMENT... 4 5.0 CONSTRUCTION NOISE... 6 7.0 CONCLUSION... 7 8.0 REFERENCES... 8 FIGURES FIGURE 1 FIGURE 2 FIGURE 3 STUDY AREA EXISTING LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD ROAD LAYOUT LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD UPPER ROAD ALIGNMENT TABLES TABLE 1 TABLE 2 TABLE 3 TABLE 4 IMPACT OF INCREASED SOUND EXPOSURES RECEIVER LOCATIONS EXISTING TRAFFIC INFORMATION SUMMARY OF CALCULATED SOUND LEVEL RESULTS APPENDICES APPENDIX 1... TRAFFIC DATA APPENDIX 2... STAMSON 5.04 SOUND LEVEL CALCULATIONS

1.0 INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared in support of the Class EA for the Lakeview Boulevard realignment between Poplar Avenue and Maple Avenue in the Town of Ajax. Lakeshore Boulevard has been proposed to be reconstructed to a single two-way road on upper alignment. This report evaluates the noise impact from the proposed upper road alignment and considers noise mitigation requirements as per the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) and the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) protocols. The location of the study area is indicated in the Figure 1 below. FIGURE 1 - STUDY AREA Lakeview Boulevard EA 1 Environmental Noise Assessment

2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE GUIDELINES Sound levels are predicted in decibels in the A-weighted dba scale, which is the closest to a human perception of sound over a specified time period. For the purposes of assessing municipal roadway noise, Leq is calculated on the basis of the 24 hour daytime period, 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. For Outdoor Living Areas (OLAs), the objective is 55dBA for the daytime period. Sound exposures were calculated using STAMSON V5.04 ORNAMENT, the computer road traffic noise prediction model of the MOE as accepted by MTO. Based on MOE protocol with the MTO, where a new or expanded roadway is proposed adjacent to a Noise Sensitive Area, the MOE requires that the future sound level be compared before and after expansion or improvements. The objective of noise mitigation is to reduce sound level as close or lower than the Provincial objective of 55dBA or the pre-construction ambient sound levels as technically, administratively or economically feasible. Noise mitigation options include the use of noise walls, berms, vertical and horizontal alignment shifts, road cuts and the use of quieter road pavement surfaces. Changes to the sound exposure are considered insignificant for 0 to 3 dba differences; just noticeable and minor for 4 to 5 dba differences; and significant for 10 dba or more sound level differences. No mitigation measures are required for sound exposure increases of 0 to 5dBA.Table 1 below shows the significance of the increased sound exposures: TABLE 1- IMPACT OF INCREASED SOUND EXPOSURES EXCESS ABOVE SOUND LEVEL CRITERION (dba) CHANGE IN LOUDNESS RATING OF NOISE IMPACT 0 to 3 No Change Insignificant 4 to 5 Perceptible Change Low 6 to 9 Almost Twice as loud Medium 10 and more Doubling of loudness or greater High For sound level increases greater than 5 dba, the following can be considered: Investigate noise control measures on the right-of-way; Noise control measures, where introduced, should achieve a minimum of 5dBA attenuation over the first row receivers; and Noise control measures should be designed to achieve sound levels as close to, or lower than, the objective level of 55dBA or the preconstruction ambient noise levels as is technically or economically feasible. Lakeview Boulevard EA 2 Environmental Noise Assessment

3.0 NOISE SENSITIVE AREAS Noise Sensitive Areas (NSA) are defined as a building that has an outdoor recreational and living areas such as residential developments. For this study, five (5) receiver locations were assessed with existing residential on both sides of Lakeview Boulevard realignment area. The receiver locations indicated on the attached Figure 2 are considered to be the noise sensitive land uses within the study area. All receivers are taken to be 1.5m above the ground and 3.0m from the rear of the buildings and/or the most exposed side of the dwelling units. Residential developments at similar setbacks and orientation are expected to have the similar sound exposures and residential developments further from the noise source are expected to have lower sound exposures due to distance attenuation. TABLE 2 - RECEIVER LOCATIONS RECEIVER ID R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 LOCATION DESCRIPTION Existing residential northwest of Lakeview Boulevard and Maple Avenue Existing residential southwest of Ebony Street and Maple Avenue Existing residential north of Ebony Road between Poplar Avenue and Maple Avenue Existing residential southeast of Ebony Street and Poplar Avenue Existing residential northeast of Lakeview Boulevard and Poplar Avenue Lakeview Boulevard EA 3 Environmental Noise Assessment

4.0 NOISE ASSESSMENT Lakeview Boulevard is currently a two-lane Local Road from Poplar Avenue to Maple Avenue with a posted speed of 40 km/h. Lakeview Boulevard is proposed to be reconstructed to the upper road alignment as shown on Figure 3. The traffic volume for Lakeview Boulevard is not expected to change with the single twoway road on the upper alignment. The 24 hour traffic volumes were calculated at each receptor locations from the projected AM/PM peak hour volumes to determine the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT). To assess the noise impact, the sound exposures from the existing road layout was compared to the sound exposures with the proposed Upper road alignment. Noise modelling was carried out for the following scenarios: Sound Levels - Current road layout Sound Levels - With Lakeview Boulevard Upper Road Alignment The road traffic data is summarized in Table 3. TABLE 3 - EXISTING TRAFFIC INFORMATION* LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD EXISTING AADT EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT (km/h) EXISTING TRUCK PERCENTAGE (%) Lakeshore Boulevard 1100 40 1.5 Between Poplar Avenue and Maple Avenue * AADT volumes for Lakeview Boulevard Upper Road Alignment are expected to remain the same as the existing road layout AADT. Lakeview Boulevard EA 4 Environmental Noise Assessment

The following Table 4 shows the existing sound exposures for each receptor locations and the sound exposures for the existing road layout and with the proposed road upper alignment. TABLE 4 - SUMMARY OF CALCULATED SOUND LEVEL RESULTS RECEPTOR* PROJECTED SOUND LEVEL Leq (dba) EXISTING ROAD CONDITION WITH UPPER ROAD ALIGNMENT PROJECTED DIFFERENCE** (dba) NOISE MITIGATION REQUIRED R1 34.7 35.4 +0.9 No R2 29.4 30.5 +1.1 No R3 28.7 31.7 +3.0 No R4 28.3 28.6 +0.3 No R5 31.0 31.0 0 No * Receptor locations shown on Figure 2. ** Difference between the current road condition and the upper road realignment. As per the MOECC and MTO Noise Protocols, noise mitigation is not required for any of the model receiver locations as a result of the proposed road realignment since the change in sound levels is less than 5 dba. Lakeview Boulevard EA 5 Environmental Noise Assessment

6.0 CONSTRUCTION NOISE Construction noise is temporary and depends on the type of work, type of equipment used, the number and frequency of equipment construction used, time and duration of operation and the proximity to the noise sensitive receptors. Construction noise constraints should be incorporated into the contract documents as per the MTO/MOECC Noise Protocol requirements. The equipment shall be maintained in an operating condition that prevents unnecessary noise, including but not limited to non-defective muffling systems, properly secured components and the lubrication of moving parts. Idling of equipment shall be restricted to the minimum necessary to perform the specified work. Any construction activities should conform to current local municipal noise by-laws considering the time of day, proximity, type of operation and equipment. Exemptions, where required will be applied for through the municipality and should be included in the construction contract documents. Lakeview Boulevard EA 6 Environmental Noise Assessment

7.0 CONCLUSION The noise assessment compared the existing Lakeview Boulevard road layout to the Upper Road Alignment. The result of the noise modeling predicted that sound levels at the noise sensitive receptors within the study area will increase less than 5 dba due to the proposed Upper Road Alignment for Lakeview Boulevard. Therefore, noise mitigation measures are not required for the Lakeview Boulevard Upper Road Alignment based on MOECC/MTO noise protocol for roadway reconstruction. Respectfully submitted, YCA ENGINEERING Limited Hava Jouharchi, P.Eng. Senior Project Engineer Lakeview Boulevard EA 7 Environmental Noise Assessment

8.0 REFERENCES 1. "MTO/MOE Protocol, Ontario Ministry of Transportation/Ontario Ministry of Environment", 1986 2. "Environmental Guide for Noise, Ontario Ministry of Transportation/Ontario Ministry of Environment", October 2006 3. "Environmental Noise Guideline - Stationary and Transportation Sources - Approval and Planning, Publication NPC-300", August 2013 4. "Environmental Office Manual - Technical Areas - Noise", Ontario Ministry of Transportation, 1992 5. "Directive QST A-1 (Noise Policy and Acoustic Standards for Provincial Highways)", Ontario Ministry of Transportation, 1992 6. PC STAMSON 5.04, "Computer Program for Road Traffic Noise Assessment", Ontario Ministry of Environment, 2000 Lakeview Boulevard EA 8 Environmental Noise Assessment

FIGURE 2 - EXISTING LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD ROAD LAYOUT FIGURE 3 - LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD UPPER ROAD ALIGNMENT

APPENDIX 1 TRAFFIC DATA

APPENDIX 2 STAMSON 5.04 SOUND LEVEL CALCULATIONS

STAMSON 5.04 NORMAL REPORT Date: 14-11-2016 10:51:13 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r1rw.te Time Period: 24 hours Description: Receptor 1 (Existing) Road data, segment # 1: Lakeview Bld ------------------------------------ Car traffic volume : 1084 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 13 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 3 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 1: Lakeview Bld ---------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 72.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Results segment # 1: Lakeview Bld --------------------------------- Source height = 0.72 m ROAD (0.00 + 34.71 + 0.00) = 34.71 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.66 47.47 0.00-11.31-1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.71 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Segment Leq : 34.71 dba Total Leq All Segments: 34.71 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES: 34.71

STAMSON 5.04 NORMAL REPORT Date: 09-02-2017 16:57:12 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r1rwa.te Time Period: 24 hours Description: Receptor 1 (Upper Road Alignment) Road data, segment # 1: Lakeview Bld ------------------------------------ Car traffic volume : 1084 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 13 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 3 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 1: Lakeview Bld ---------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 64.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Lakeview Bld --------------------------------- Source height = 0.72 m ROAD (0.00 + 35.56 + 0.00) = 35.56 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.66 47.47 0.00-10.46-1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.56 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Segment Leq : 35.56 dba Total Leq All Segments: 35.56 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES: 35.56

STAMSON 5.04 NORMAL REPORT Date: 14-11-2016 10:53:49 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r3rw.te Description: Receptor 3 Time Period: 24 hours (Existing) Road data, segment # 1: Lakeview Bld ------------------------------------ Car traffic volume : 1084 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 13 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 3 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 1: Lakeview Bld ---------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 165.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Results segment # 1: Lakeview Bld --------------------------------- Source height = 0.72 m ROAD (0.00 + 28.73 + 0.00) = 28.73 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.66 47.47 0.00-17.29-1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.73 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Segment Leq : 28.73 dba Total Leq All Segments: 28.73 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES: 28.73

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 09-02-2017 17:00:59 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r3rw.te Time Period: 24 hours Description: Receptor 3 (Upper Road Alignment) Road data, segment # 1: Lakeview Bld ------------------------------------ Car traffic volume : 1084 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 13 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 3 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 1: Lakeview Bld ---------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 110.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Lakeview Bld --------------------------------- Source height = 0.72 m ROAD (0.00 + 31.65 + 0.00) = 31.65 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.66 47.47 0.00-14.36-1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.65 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Segment Leq : 31.65 dba Total Leq All Segments: 31.65 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES: 31.65 dba