MIXED LIQUOR FERMENTATION FOR CARBON AUGMENTATION BREAKING FREE FROM AN UNFAVORABLE INFLUENT CARBON BALANCE

Similar documents
Biological Phosphorous Removal Is Coming! Michigan Water Environment Association Annual Conference, June 23, 2008; Boyne Falls MI

Re Thinking Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHOROUS REMOVAL AN OPERATOR S GUIDE

Biological Phosphorus Removal Technology. Presented by: Eugene Laschinger, P.E.

A Roadmap for Smarter Nutrient Management in a Carbon and Energy Constrained World. Samuel Jeyanayagam, PhD, PE, BCEE

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL PLUS CHEMICAL POLISHING FOR LOW LEVEL COMPLIANCE

A Review of the Current State of Knowledge on Phosphorus Removal

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

PLANNING FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL: WHAT STEPS CAN WE BE TAKING NOW?

Optimizing Nutrient Removal. PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

ENHANCED BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHIN MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS. 255 Consumers Road Toronto, ON, Canada, M2J 5B6

Emerging Issues in the Water/Wastewater Industry. Austin s Full-Scale Step-BNR Demonstration

Innovative Phosphorus Control to Turn Struvite Headaches into Increase Revenue. Peter Schauer, Rob Baur, Brett Laney PNCWA 2010

Contents General Information Abbreviations and Acronyms Chapter 1 Wastewater Treatment and the Development of Activated Sludge

MORE EFFICIENT MECHANISMS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL

2.0 Nutrient Removal Alternatives

Biological Phosphorus Removal

An Attempt to Sustainably Stabilize EBPR Performance at Meriden, CT with Side-Stream EBPR

OPTIMIZING THE OPERATION OF ACTIVATED SLUDGE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES GRANT WEAVER, PE & WASTEWATER OPERATOR WEBINAR MARCH 18, 2014

BIOLOGICAL WASTEWATER BASICS

Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago

NEWEA 2015 Annual Conference Session 16

RE ENGINEERING O&M PRACTICES TO GET NITROGEN & PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHOUT FACILITY UPGRADES

CRUDE COD CHARACTERISTICS SIGNIFICANT FOR BIOLOGICAL P REMOVAL: A U.K. EXAMPLE

NITROGEN REMOVAL GUIDE FOR WASTEWATER OPERATORS THE WATER PLANET COMPANY FORMS OF NITROGEN OF INTEREST TO WASTEWATER OPERATORS

SECTION 14.0 BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL

Aqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

2015 Spring Conference

Use of Biowin for Process Troubleshooting / Design for a Unique Wastewater

Meeting SB1 Requirements and TP Removal Fundamentals

THE SEQUENCED AERATION PROCESS MONTAGUE, MASSACHUSETTS

Using Function Series in BioWin

Removal of High C and N Contents in Synthetic Wastewater Using Internal Circulation of Anaerobic and Anoxic/Oxic Activated Sludge Processes

Chapter 4: Advanced Wastewater Treatment for Phosphorous Removal

JTAC Presentation May 18, Nutrient Removal Process Fundamentals and Operation

New Developments in BioWin 4.0

TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Biological Nutrient Removal Operations. December 9 th, 2015 Presenter Georgine Grissop PE, BCEE

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PROVEN METHODS FOR UPGRADING YOUR FACILITIES

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

CE421/521 Environmental Biotechnology. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Cycles Lecture Tim Ellis

ADVANCING NOVEL PROCESSES FOR BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL

BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

Improving Septic Tank Performance by Enhancing Anaerobic Digestion NOWRA Onsite Wastewater Mega-Conference

OWEA Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Upgrading WRFs for Biological Nutrient Removal. June 25, 2015

Prepared by the Operation of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants Task Force of the Water Environment Federation

ISAM INTEGRATED SURGE ANOXIC MIX

City of Loveland Nutrient Removal Evaluation Final Report

Case Study. Biological Help for the Human Race. Bathurst Municipal Wastewater Treatment Works, New South Wales, Australia.

Efficient Design Configurations for Biological Nutrient Removal

CSR Process Simulations Can Help Municipalities Meet Stringent Nutrient Removal Requirements

Environmental Biotechnology Cooperative Research Centre Date submitted: March 2008 Date published: March 2011

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

General Information on Nitrogen

A Battle to Be the Best: A Comparison of Two Powerful Sidestream Treatment Technologies: Post Aerobic Digestion and Anammox

Table A1 - Peak Factors Used In Preparation Of Synthetic Database...1. Table A2 - Hourly Factors Used In Preparation Of Synthetic Database...

OPTIMIZATION STUDY OF THE ST. MARY'S WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Nutrient Removal Optimization at the Fairview WWTP

CEDAR CREEK Wastewater Treatment Facility

20 Years of Nutrient Removal City of Beloit

Presentation Outline

CORPORATION THE EXPERIENCED LEADER IN SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR TECHNOLOGY

Application of the AGF (Anoxic Gas Flotation) Process

Advances in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal at Low DO Conditions

Case Study. BiOWiSH Aqua. Biological Help for the Human Race. Municipal Wastewater Bathurst Waste Water Treatment Works Australia.

Municipal Wastewater Treatment Improvement Using Computer Simulating

Anderson Water Pollution Control Plant

Secondary Treatment Process Control

James Winslade Instructor, Environmental Resources Training Center Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville

Choices to Address Filamentous Growth

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

USING NUMERICAL SIMULATION SOFTWARE FOR IMPROVING WASTEWATER TREATMENT EFFICIENCY

6.2 Umgeni Water Owned Wastewater Works

Phosphorus Removal Treatment Alternatives

Module 22 : Sludge Management

Operation and Control of Multiple BNR Processes in One WWTP

Post-Aerobic Digester with Bioaugmentation Pilot Study City of Meridian, ID WWTP PNCWA 2010

General Operational Considerations in Nutrient and Wet Weather Flow Management for Wastewater Treatment Facilities Part II

Fundamental and practical studies on Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) Daniel R. Noguera

Activated Sludge Process Control: Nitrification

Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor followed by reverse osmosis filtration a novel solution for resource recovery from fodd industry

THE IMPACT OF AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (BTX'S) ON SEWAGE QUALITY TREATED BY THE BIOLOGICAL METHOD

Dave Diehl Applied Technologies, Inc.

Dave Diehl Applied Technologies, Inc.

Activated Sludge Process Control:

Altoona Westerly Wastewater Treatment Facility BNR Conversion with Wet Weather Accommodation

Managing the Risk of Embracing Disruptive Technology

Thermophilic hydrolysis and acidification of activated sludge with a low organic carbon content under different sludge concentrations

Optimization of Anaerobic Digestion with Bio- Organic Catalyst Compositions (BOCs)

<1ppm Phosphorus A BNR With No Chemical Addition Case Study

SECTION 8.0 NEWPCC SECOND PRIORITY CONTROL ALTERNATIVES

Lysis and Autooxidation. Organic Nitrogen (net growth) Figure by MIT OCW.

INTRODUCTION TO NUTRIENT CONTROL FOR SMALL COMMUNITIES NUTRIENTS 101

SIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES

UDWQ POTW Nutrient Removal Cost Impact Study: Analysis of Tremonton City Wastewater Treatment Plant

Nutrient Removal Processes MARK GEHRING TECHNICAL SALES MGR., BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT

AMMONIA REMOVAL USING MLE PROCESS EXPERIENCES AT BALLARAT NORTH. David Reyne. Central Highlands Water Authority

Activated Sludge Base Notes: for student. Activated Sludge Intro. What is Activated Sludge? 3/12/2012

AquaNereda Aerobic Granular Sludge Technology

Transcription:

MIXED LIQUR FERMENTATIN FR CARBN AUGMENTATIN BREAKING FREE FRM AN UNFAVRABLE INFLUENT CARBN BALANCE Matt Bond, Associate Vice President Patrick Dunlap, Wastewater Process Specialist

UNDERSTANDING BI-P TRADITINAL FLW DIAGRAMS FR BILGICAL NUTRIENT REMVAL (BNR) Anaerobic Anoxic Aerobic 2

UNDERSTANDING BI-P ANAERBIC CNDITINS PHSPHRUS RELEASE AND PLY-P DEPLETIN Poly-P Poly-P P P Poly-P Phosphate Using Energy PHB PHB PHB VFA Magnesium Adenosine Tri-Phosphate Bio-battery for energy storage P Volatile Fatty Acids P P N N H H ATP H 2 N N N 3

PHB Poly-P Electron microscope Poly-P stains black, PHB stains white Poly-P November 16-18, 2010

UNDERSTANDING BI-P AERBIC CNDITINS PHSPHATE UPTAKE AND PLY-P PRDUCTIN Poly-P Poly-P Poly-P P Making Energy Phosphate P Magnesium P Bio-battery is recharging P N H H ATP H 2 N N N N PHB PHB PHB PHB Aeration Basin 5

B&V - 6 May 11-14, 2010 Poly-phosphate stored in the aerobic zone. Phosphorus is removed with the WAS. Poly-P January 21, 2011, 2010

Why is Bio-P Removal Perceived to be Inconsistent? We have over 20 years of Bio-P history and many plants perform exceptionally well However some plants with CD:P > 40 ratio don t remove P to below permit or will in the summer but not in the winter WHY??? Biological phosphorus removal is notoriously unreliable Recent IWA Conference Paper Biological phosphorus removal is something you design for, hope for, then add chemicals if is doesn t work Poul Harremoes 1998 NT ALL INFLUENT CD IS EQUAL: INFLUENT QUALITY IS THE KEY T SUCCESSFUL BI-P PERFRMANCE 7

THE IMPRTANCE F INFLUENT SAMPLING BNR will not work. Chemicals or a fermenter required. BNR will work. Soluble & Degradable Soluble & Non-biodegradable Soluble & Degradable Particulate & Degradable Particulate & Non-biodegradable Particulate & Degradable Soluble & Non-biodegradable Particulate & Non-biodegradable Wastewater Chemical xygen Demand Methods for Wastewater Characterization in Activated Sludge Modeling (Melcer et al., 2003) 8

rbcd/p ratio THE IMPRTANCE F INFLUENT SAMPLING 25.0 VIP McDowell Creek 20.0 Durham 15.0 10.0 5.0 Eagle s Point Reedy Creek Below the curve plants struggle with BPR At or above curve plants achieve good BPR 0.0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Fraction of rbcd that is VFA 9

WHAT FACTRS AFFECT INFLUENT SLUBLE CD AND VFA? R. WHY WULD DR CMPLAINTS FRM THE CLLECTIN SYSTEM EVER BE A GD THING? Fermentation produces H 2 S (odor) and also influent rbcd and VFA Collection System factors promoting VFA formation High Water Temperature Long Travel Time Flat (Solids Accumulation) Forcemains (No Headspace) 10

CASE IN PINT: HENDERSN NV Plant was consistently achieving permit limit and then it wasn t Plant had entirely lost biological phosphorus removal Sampling revealed VFA was not longer present in influent What happened? A casino had began to discharge nitrates for odor control downstream of their discharge. Fixed odor problems but also removed the VFA 11

PTENTIAL SCENARIS FR VFA Plenty of VFA in influent wastewater means VFA augmentation not needed fermentation has already occurred in the sewer Plenty of rbcd (not much VFA) in influent means that fermentation occurs in the anaerobic zone Not enough VFA or rbcd means rbcd and VFA must be made elsewhere on site or added as supplemental carbon augmentation needed Direct rbcd Supplementation Primary Fermentation RAS Fermentation Mixed Liquor Fermentation 12

FERMENTATIN PTINS 1. Primary Sludge 2. Return Activated Sludge 3. Mixed Liquor Fermentation Substrate Hydrolysis rbcd Fermentation VFAs Methane Formation Methane Influent 1 3 Anaerobic Anoxic 2 Aerobic Primary Sludge WAS 13

rbcd/p ratio 25.0 PRIMARY FERMENTATIN VIP McDowell Creek 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 Durham Reedy Creek Raw Influent Eagle s Point PST ptional Recycle Below the curve plants struggle with BPR At or above curve plants achieve good BPR Anaerobic 0.0 To Digesters 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Fraction of rbcd that is VFA Highest Yield of VFA for amount of VSS destroyed Relatively complex operation Additional facilities needed Removes a potential for energy generation dors control will likely be needed 14

RAS FERMENTATIN Secondary Influent Anaerobic Anoxic Aerobic VFA RAS Fermenter WAS RAS Fermenter receives 4-7 % or RAS Flow for 30-40 Hours HRT (Vollertsen, 2006) Much more common in Northern Europe. For example, this is used at more than 30 plants in Denmark. Lower VFA yield per VSS destruction than with primary sludge (Yuan, 2010) 15

MIXED LIQUR FERMENTATIN Fermenter Fermenter Mixed Liquor Recycle from Production Unmixed Anaerobic of rbcd for solids Zone accumulation rbcd and VFA returned Particulate SRT > 2 days ~10% BD of hydrolyzes Influent Flow to Anaerobic or Anoxic Hs Mixed lyses/hydrolyze for Particulate several minutes BD per day for wasting Zone BioP bacteria accumulate incorporated some into VFA MLSS Hs Present Sidestream In-Line Mixed Mixed Liquor Liquor Fermentation Fermenter Mixed Liquor Fermenter Secondary Influent Anaerobic Unmixed Anaerobic Anoxic Aerobic WAS 16

ADVANTAGES F MIXED LIQUR FERMENTATIN Primary Sludge Fermentation Need Primaries More Complex peration Higher Capital Investment Higher dor RAS Low Yield Mixed Liquor Fermentation Inline Simple operation Combination of sources Increased Yield 17

HENDERSN NV Turning off mixer is the same as bypassing flow around the anaerobic cell Ferments about 10-15% of the MLSS 18

SURFACE APPEARANCE F HENDERSN PLANT During mixing Some hours after mixer off 19

LATHE KANSAS HAS A FRESH INFLUENT WITH LW VFA AND LW rbcd Influent has enough BD to support BNR but a low soluble BD fraction Special sampling and modeling demonstrated that system is deficient in soluble carbon 20

UNIQUE FERMENTER FLW PATH Pump into Fermenter (from end of AN zone) Intermittent mixing verflow out of Fermenter To AN Zone r AX Zone 21

Fermenter Modified feed to distribute evenly along the bottom

Fermenter (opposite end)

FERMENTER STARTUP Weekly solids inventory Mixers control wasting and solids retention time Mix 3 min/day 2 5 days SRT 24

rbcd/p ratio LATHE WITH MIXED LIQUR FERMENTATIN 25.0 VIP McDowell Creek 20.0 Durham 15.0 10.0 lathe Reedy Creek At or above curve plants achieve good BPR 5.0 Below the curve plants struggle with BPR 0.0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Fraction of rbcd that is VFA 25

LATHE EFFLUENT SINCE STARTUP No Chemical Addition Permit limits go into effect July 1, 2013 26

TEN MILE CREEK MIXED LIQUR FERMENTATIN DEMNSTRATIN Basin 5 Unused Basin 4 Unused Secondary Clarifier Ae Basin 3 Demo Ae An Primary Clarifier Phase 12 3 : Baseline Fermentation Dedicated Phoredox Mixed in Sludge Liquor Blanket Fermenter To Gravity Thickener (Not Pictured) 27

MDELING MIXED LIQUR FERMENTATIN Working on comparing VFA and rbcd yield from VSS destruction from projects to Model predictions Main SRT, MLF SRT, Influent, Primary Removal All impact VFA yeild Consulting with Envirosim (BioWin) on this 28

ACKNWLEDGEMENTS City of Henderson NV City of lathe Kansas Trinity River Authority 29

QUESTINS? KELLER FERMENT ATIN: UNLEASHI NG THE PWER AND MAKING IT WRK