Pesticide Residues in Drinking Water. Michael F. Hare, Ph.D. Pesticides Division Texas Department of Agriculture

Similar documents
Table 10: U.S. AGRICULTURAL IMPORTS FROM CANADA, 1995 AND 1996

Table 8: U.S. AGRICULTURAL IMPORTS FROM MEXICO, 1995 AND 1996

Vegetables. Asparagus Production Up 13 Percent from 2017 Onion Production Down 5 Percent from 2017 Strawberry Production Down 1 Percent from 2017

Market opportunities for Queensland agribusiness from FTAs with China, Japan and South Korea. Queensland Production

on Pesticide Use Matthew Buck Assistant Director

California s International Agricultural Exports in 2004

Chapel Hill Farmers' Market

Interim Update on the Economic Impact of Michigan s Agri-Food and Agri-Energy System

Energy Efficiency, Food Miles and Fuel Usage in Food Transport

In 2003 California s agricultural exports increased 14

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D.C., 20460

Step 1: Get Started - Farmer Self-Assessment

Step 1: Get Started - Farmer Self-Assessment

Chapel Hill Farmers' Market NEW MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION PACKET ( )

Agricultural Marketing Service Monitoring Programs Division

Mississippi Fresh Produce Availability Calendar

California s International Agricultural Exports in 2002

PORTAGE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FARMERS MARKET 2018 APPLICATION COMPLETE THESE PAGES 1 THROUGH 4 AND RETURN TO MARKET MANAGER

Chemical Residue Analysis, FY Florida Dept. of Agriculture

APPENDIX 1. Mean estimated weight (MEW) mean real weight (MRW) (g) and percentage error estimation, according to method.

MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION

Payment details: 2018 Midweek Market Vendor Application

Prices Received, Prices Paid, and Ratio of Prices Received to Prices Paid Indexes 2011 Base United States: February 2015 with Comparisons

Agricultural Prices. May Farm Prices Received Index Declined 2 Points

Payment details: 2018 Saturday Market Vendor Application

2018 Farmers Markets Price Reports

DRAFT Procedure used to estimate irrigation consumptive water use in the Susquehanna River Basin May 31, 2013

AGRICULTURAL OVERVIEW

Pesticide Residue Issues in California: Is Our Food Safe?

Risk Assessment for Safety of Orange Juice Containing Fungicide Carbendazim

Agricultural Prices. Special Note. January Prices Received Index Down 4.5 Percent

Introduction to PKalc

Virginia ABCs. Learning the Agriculture Alphabet. Published by Virginia Farm Bureau Women s and Young Farmer Department, 2007

Prices Received, Prices Paid, and Ratio of Prices Received to Prices Paid Indexes 2011 Base United States: December 2018 with Comparisons

Organic Foods: Understanding Organic Food Labels, Benefits, and Claims

Founded in Houston, TX as a biotechnological, innovative

Role of NAFTA in California Agriculture: a Brief Review*

PRICES OF COMMODITY PRODUCTS

A brief focus on Georgia s agricultural industry

Farmers & Farmers Market Handbook

Agricultural Prices. October Prices Received Index Down 3.5 Percent

Hop Area Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value States and United States:

Agricultural Prices. Special Note. May Prices Received Index Increased 1.7 Percent

Agricultural Prices. June Prices Received Index Increased 0.1 Percent

The Use of Local Foods in Maryland Schools: Findings from a Survey of Food Service Directors

Farm Eligibility Table. Fire & Allied. Classification. FL/GL Auto

Bayshore Produce Weekly Market Guide February 22nd 2018

Table 1. Top 10 Herbicides, Insecticides and Fungicides Used in Texas* ingredient

Findings from the Township of Langley Food Self-reliance Study

Air quality in the San Joaquin

Virtual Water Consumption and its Relationship to Future Food Security in Singapore

Tradi'onal Agriculture

Farmers & Farmers Market Handbook

EAT RIGHT FOR YOUR BLOOD TYPE

British Columbia Agrifood Industry YEAR IN REVIEW 2015

PLANT ENTERPRISES PRODUCTION

regon Agricultural Commodities

Agricultural Prices. April Prices Received Index Decreased 2.2 Percent

Review on the pesticide residue works in Nepal. Sunil Aryal Senior Scientist Entomology Division Nepal Agricultural Research Council Khumaltar

Global Status of Commercialized Biotech Crops. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications

EFFECT OF INTENSIVE FERTILIZER USE ON GROUNDWATER QUALITY

Agricultural CROP REPORT. Yolo County

Crossroads Resource Center

Agricultural CROP REPORT. Yolo County

Prices Received, Prices Paid, and Ratio of Prices Received to Prices Paid Indexes 2011 Base United States: February 2019 with Comparisons

Using Stewardship to Market Advantage. Scott Exo Executive Director

Carbon Footprint Analysis for Kaiser Permanente Food Procurement Alternatives in Northern California

Characterizing U.S. Fruit and Vegetable Production

New Jersey Food Monitoring & Evaluation Program

Farmers Market Guidance February 7, 2017

Protectionist View Impacts on American Agriculture VERONICA NIGH AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION 11/13/2018

REGIONAL FOOD HUB PILOT PROJECT. Regional Profiles. A project of the Greenbelt Fund

Florida Farm to School Programs

Whole Soil Fertility Step-by-Step

Food and Farm Assessment for a Five-County Region in the Southern Appalachians: Alleghany, Ashe, Watauga, Wilkes, and Johnson County

Irrigation Scheduling

EXTRACTS OF THYME REASONS TO SHOP AT A FARMERS' MARKET

2017 COLUSA COUNTY CROP REPORT

Oregon County and S ate Agricultural Estimates

How Low Has the Farm Share of Retail Food Prices Really Fallen?

Executive Summary. Fruits and Berries

Supply, demand, and projected nutritional need for fruits and vegetables

2/11/2015. Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program for 2015 and Subsequent Crop years

COLUSA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 2011 CROP REPORT JOSEPH J. DAMIANO AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONER

Animal-based agriculture Vs. Plant-based agriculture. A multi-product data comparison. [CURRENT DATA] March 22, 2017

Production, Purchase, Sale, and

CSFP Food Ordering. New CSFP State Training Arlington, VA February 24, Lauren King-Dillon & Special Allen Household Operations Branch

Colusa County Department of Agriculture Crop Report. Harry A. Krug Agricultural Commissioner

PRICE INDICES IN AGRICULTURE, THIRD QUARTER OF

The Measure of California Agriculture

Colorado Reader. What is Agriculture? Food, Fiber and Natural Resource Literacy Colorado Foundation for Agriculture -

VENDOR APPLICATION (Please complete all 3 pages) Taxes: Please circle the options that applies to you:

AgriStability GUIDE FOR REPORTING PRODUCTIVE UNITS FOR 2013

MICROFARMING: Growing for Farmers Markets August 27, Susan Head Mississippi Department of Agriculture and Commerce

Adding Value with Horticulture Farming

Herbicides and the Environment: Understanding Toxicity. Tim Miller WSU NWREC, Mount Vernon WA

National Census of Agriculture September 9 November

Irrigation Technology and Design. 1. Why do we Irrigate? How do we apply irrigation water? KPU Small Farm Sessions 2/13/2016

IRRIGATION WATER QUALITY SALINITY

Oregon State University Extension Service. 71 refl.), ITO :OP. UnbountliqP nr1 not circulate

Transcription:

Pesticide Residues in Drinking Water Michael F. Hare, Ph.D. Pesticides Division Texas Department of Agriculture

[Federal Register: September 27, 2002 (Vol 67, # 188)] [Notices] [Page 61099-61102] ---------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Caffeine; Receipt of Application for Emergency Exemption, Solicitation of Public Comment. SUMMARY: EPA has received a quarantine exemption request from the USDA APHIS to use the pesticide caffeine (1H-purine- 2,6-dione,3,7-dihydro-1,3,7- trimethyl-) (CAS No. 58-08-2) to treat up to 200 acres of floriculture and nursery crops, parks, hotels and resort areas, and forest habitats to control Coqui and Greenhouse frogs.

USDA s Pesticide Data Program Residue data from 1991 to the present Focused on foods consumed by children Data are representative of exposure in the US diet.

Commodities 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 apples apples apples apples apples apple juice bananas bananas bananas bananas bananas apples grapefruit celery carrots broccoli carrots can/frz grnbns grapes grapefruit grapes carrots grapes carrots lettuce grapes green beans celery green beans grapes oranges green beansoranges grapes oranges oranges potatoes lettuce peaches green beans peaches peaches oranges peas lettuce potatoes spinach peaches potatoes oranges spinach sweet corn potatoes spinach peaches sweet corn sweet peas sweet corn potatoes sweet peas sweet pot. wheat sweet corn wheat tomatoes sweet peas wheat whole milk

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 apple juice apple juice apples apples apples apples can peach cantaloupe cantaloupe cantaloupes bananas apple juice can peach cn/frz grnbnscorn syrup carrots broccoli apple sauce can spinach corn syrup cucumbers cherries carrots asparagus can/frz grnbnsgrape juice grape juice cucumbers celery bananas frz w squash milk lettuce grapes cherries barley orange juice orange juice oats (roll/brn) green beans grapes beef pears pears pears (frsh/cn) lettuce grn bns broccoli potat spec. soybeans spinach, frozen nectarines lettuce carrots potatoes spinach strwbrs (frsh/frz) oranges mushrooms celery soybeans strawberries sweet bell pepperpeaches nectarines cucumbers spinach sweet pot. tomatoes (fr/can) peanut butter oranges mushrooms sweet pot. tomatoes w. squash (fr/frz) pears (can) peaches onions tomatoes wnt squash pineapples pineapples peaches wheat potatoes potatoes pineapples whole milk poultry can swt.corn potatoes winter squash rice can set peas rice strwbrs (frsh/frz) can tom.paste spinach swt bll peps rice sweet bell peppers tomatoes (can) water, drnk sweet corn, can beef, fat sweet corn, frozen beef, liver sweet peas, can beef, muscle sweet peas, frozen poultry, fat water, fin. drnk. poultry, liver poultry, muscle

2003 2004 2005 Apples Apples Apples Asparagus, canned Cantaloupe Cantaloupe Asparagus, fresh Cauliflower Cauliflower Barley Cucumbers Cream, heavy Butter Grapes Eggplant Cantaloupe Green Beans, canne Grapefruit Cucumgers Green Beans, fresh Grapes Green Beans, canned Lettuce Green Beans, fresh Mushrooms Milk Green Beans, frozen Onions Orange Juice Lettuce Peaches, canned Oranges Milk Peaches, fresh Peaches, canned Orange Juice Pear Juice, conc/pure Pears Oranges Pears, fresh Soybean Grain Pears Spinach Spinach, canned Plums, Fresh Sweet Bell Peppers Strawberries Plums, dried (prunes Sweet Corn, frozen Sweet Bell Peppers Pork, adipose/muscle Sweet Peas, frozen Sweet Potatoes Soybean Grain Sweet Potatoes Tomatoes Strawberries Tomatoes Water, finished Water, bottled Water, fin. drnk. Water, untreated Water, finished Wheat Flour Wheat Flour Water, untreated Winter Squash Watermelon Wheat Grain Winter Squash

Pesticides in Fruits & Vegetables Year # pest. test. # comm. # samples % detect. # viol. 1991 34 7 1,963 22 4 1992 a 42 10 2,859 58 19 1993 58 12 7,328 70.6 110 1994 71 13 7,589 61.5 98 1995 69 12 6,924 65 263 1996 91 14 4,856 71.8 196 1997 96 15 6,321 57 383 1998 113 14 7,017 61.2 320 1999 104 13 8,637 67 345 2000 134 20 8,912 66.6 125 2001 152 26 9,903 64.1 251 2002 158 24 10,056 47 387

2003 12,316 f&v's 9,732 43 barley 452 8 butter 732 99 wheat flour 606 45 drinking water 794 54 0 2004 13,208 f&v's (fresh) 8,881 76 f&v's (processed) 1,485 40 soybean 616 42 wheat flour 725 57 milk 739 100 drinking water 762 2005 14,749 f&v's (fresh) 8,702 73 f&v's (processed) 1,452 61 Cream 369 99 Milk 746 99 Bottled Water 378 16 drinking water 750 soybean 974 22 Pork 704 8

PDP 2002 Participating labs monitored 158 pesticides plus 48 metabolites, degradates, and isomers using multiresidue methods. Accepted samples are prepared emulating the practices of the average consumer to more closely represent actual exposure to residues.

PDP 2002 Data from 2002 10,056 samples of fruits and vegetables 725 barley samples 495 rice samples 924 beef samples 699 drinking water samples

PDP Summary 2002 Pesticide Detections Commodity %w/o Fruits & Vegs 53 Barley 85 Rice 82 Beef 85 Overall 58

PDP Summary 2002 Residue Detections Residues Percent Cum. Percent 0 58 58 1 19 77 >1 23 100

Finished Drinking Water Monitoring Survey Coordinated with EPA and the AWWA* Water treatment facilities are solicited Facility personnel collect samples Analysis at PDP laboratories PDP provides data to facilities in quarterly updates * American Water Works Association

Finished Drinking Water Monitoring Survey Unlike data collected on f&v, not representative. Reflects the unique characteristics of the watersheds sampled. Collected just before distribution to consumers.

Drinking Water 2001: Samples from NY (11), CA (10) Two highly populated regions Different hydrological settings Samples collected bimonthly 2002: Five new sites in KA (2), CO (2), TX (1) added Rural areas (<50,000 pop.) Samples collected weekly

Change in Criteria 2001-2003 sites selected to represent diversity of land use 2004 and 2005, criteria for site selection changed. Service to more than 50,000 people Use of surface water as primary source Location in regions of heavy agriculture where it was known that pesticides heavily applied.

Table 9. Sampling summary; 2001-2005. 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 No. of Samples 297 699 794 762 750 No. of residues assayed 170 212 230 233 222 No. pesticides detected 17 28 33 38 43 Per cent of pesticides det. 10 13.2 14.35 16.31 19.37 Total samples 3173 11640 18663 11028 13187 Total samples w/ detects 455 1503 1857 2415 3528 % of samples w/ detects 14.34 12.91 9.95 21.9 26.8

Table 8. Summary of selected drinking water pesticide data from 2001-2005. %Samples with detects Pesticide 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Trend a Atrazine 59.6 44.3 41.7 50.3 74.6 + Desethyl atrazine 48.7 48.6 34.7 46.8 66 + Desisopropyl atrazine 41.6 40.1 20 33.4 40.1 N/A Hydroxy atrazine ND ND ND 66 66.7 N/A Metolachlor 50.2 40 41.2 40.2 43 N/A Metolachlor ethanesulfonic acid 22.9 51.9 41.9 48.5 74.1 + Metolachlor oxanilic acid 10.1 37.6 36.7 43.8 62.8 + Simazine 15.3 21.1 17.5 41.1 47.9 + Alachlor 0 0 0.7 0.8 0 N/A Alachlor ethanesulfonic acid 3.8 32.6 18.6 39.1 50.3 + Alachlor oxanilic acid 0.7 5.1 5.1 27.7 38 + 2,4-D ND 16.5 24.3 35.4 58.8 + Imazapyr 0 1.5 0.7 45.2 59.3 + Prometon 0 4.7 5.4 51.6 53.2 + Bentazon 1 7.5 9.3 40.3 44.7 + Acetochlor 0 0 3.1 2.9 2.4 N/A Acetochlor ethanesulfonic acid 0 1.3 3.8 80.9 40.1 + Acetochlor oxanilic acid 0 0 1.7 39.6 38.5 + Tebuthiuron 1.9 5.7 4.8 33 37.7 + a Trend symbols: (-) declining; (+) increasing; (N/A) trend not applicable ND: Not Determned; was not included in the pesticide analysis.

Atrazine 80 12 Percent Detects 60 40 20 0 1 2 3 4 5 10 8 6 4 2 0 DL (ppt) Atrazine (%detects) lower DL (ppt) upper DL (ppt) Year

Metolachlor ethanesulfonic acid 100 400 Percent Detects 80 60 40 20 300 200 100 DL (ppt) M. ethanesulfonic acid (%det.) lower DL (ppt) upper DL (ppt) 0 1 2 3 4 5 Year 0

Table 10. Detection Limit Values and Detection percentages for selected pesticides in drinking water. 2001-2005. % Detects Detection Limit Values (ppt) %Detects Change Pesticide 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 %Change a in DL b Atrazine (%detects) 59.6 44.3 41.7 50.3 74.6 25.2 lower DL 5 2.3 2.3 0.66 0.66 7.6 upper DL 7.5 7.5 5 5 5 1.5 Desethyl atrazine (% detects) 48.7 48.6 34.7 46.8 66 35.5 lower DL 24.8 25 24.8 0.43 0.43 57.7 upper DL 24.8 25 25 25 25 0 Desisopropyl atrazine (% det.) 41.6 40.1 20 33.4 40.1-3.6 lower DL 9.8 9.8 9.8 1.6 1.6 6.1 upper DL 32.5 50 50 50 50 0.7 Hydroxy atrazine (% dets.) - - - 66.0 66.7 0.0 Metolachlor (% dets.) 50.2 40 41.2 40.2 43-14.3 lower DL 5 3 3 1.5 1.5 3.3 upper DL 6 6 5 5 45 0.1 M. ethanesulfonic acid (%det.) 22.9 51.9 41.9 48.5 74.1 223.6 lower DL 300 12 12 12 0.36 833.3 upper DL 300 300 150 150 45 6.7 M. oxanilic acid (% dets.) 10.1 37.6 36.7 43.8 62.8 521.8 lower DL 300 12 12 12 3.2 93.8 upper DL 300 300 100 100 45 6.7 Simazine (% detects) 15.3 21.1 17.5 41.1 47.9 213.1 lower DL 7.5 3.8 3.8 0.71 0.71 10.6 upper DL 50 15 15 15 15 3.3 Alachlor (% detects) - - 0.7 0.8-0.0 A. ethanesulfonic acid (% dets) 3.8 32.6 18.6 39.1 50.3 1223.7 lower DL 300 12 12 12 1.7 176.5 upper DL 300 300 823 823 45 6.7 Alachlor oxanilic acid (% det.) 0.7 5.1 5.1 27.7 38 5328.6 lower DL 300 24 12 12 0.61 491.8 upper DL 300 300 100 100 45 6.7 2,4-D (% detects) 16.5 24.3 35.4 58.8 256.4 lower DL 7.2 2.6 3.6 0.65 11.1 upper DL 7.2 1700 264 90-11.5 a To calculate % Change in the % Detections the % of detects in 2001 were subtracted from the in 2005; the remainder was then divided by the % Detects in 2001 (baseline) and the result mu 100 to give a percentage change from 2001. b Detection Limits are express and a "fold" decrease relative to detection limits in 2001. For inst the Lower DL for Atrazine, the Lower DL for 2001 (5.0) was divided by the Lower DL for 2005 (0 resulting in a 7.6 fold decrease in the Lower DL from 2001 to 2005.

Okay, so what does it all mean? We need some perspective!

Atrazine, 2005 Max. conc. Detected? 1.5 ppb or 1.5 ug/l EPA says 2 L/day So; 3 ug/day What is the Risk? RfDc = 0.018 mg/kg/day Ave. person in US = 70 kg Thus, 1.26 mg/day 3 ug = 0.003 mg Thus, drinking worse case scenario water gives you 0.24% of the RfDc. Not much

A Simple Comparison Average American consumes 4.5 cups of coffee per day. That s about 238 mg of caffeine per person per day. Average exposure to atrazine in finished drinking water is 0.003 mg/person/day. So, average American is exposed to about 80,000 times more caffeine than atrazine.

A Simple Comparison, pt. 2 Daily Exposure %LD 50 Caffeine 238 mg 2.7 Atrazine 0.003 mg 0.0001 Malathion 0.42 mg 0.000002

So, is Caffeine killing us? What we know. Caffeine can increase blood pressure but only for a short time. There is no other biologically plausible reason why coffee should cause heart or other vascular effects.

Still Concerned? How about bottled water?

Table 6. Distribution of Residues by Pesticide in Bottled Water in 2005. % of Samples Samples Pest No. of with with Pesticide Type Samples Detects Detects Hydroxy atrazine HM 211 22 10.4 Met. ethanesulfonic acid HM 211 18 8.5 Desethyl atrazine HM 378 26 6.9 Ala. ethanesulfonic acid HM 211 9 4.3 Met. oxanillic acid HM 211 6 2.8 Atrazine H 378 10 2.6 Desethyl -desisopropyl atrazine HM 211 4 1.9 Imazethapyr H 211 2 0.9 Desisopropyl atrazine HM 378 3 0.8 Picloram H 211 1 0.5 Alachlor oxanillic acid HM 211 1 0.5 Acetochlor oxanillic acid HM 211 1 0.5 Tetraconazole F 378 1 0.3 Acetochlor H 378 1 0.3

Table 7. Comparison of pesticide residues in bottled water and in public drinking water for selected pestides in 2005. % of Samples with Detects Drinking Bottled % Pesticide Water Water Difference Atrazine 74.6 2.6 72 Met. ethanesulfonic acid 74.1 8.5 65.6 Hydroxy atrazine 66.7 10.4 56.3 Desethyl atrazine 66 6.9 59.1 Met. oxanillic acid 62.8 2.8 60 Ala. ethanesulfonic acid 50.3 4.3 46 Desisopropyl atrazine 40.1 0.8 39.3 Acetochlor oxanillic acid 38.5 0.5 38 Alachlor oxanillic acid 38 0.5 37.5 Imazethapyr 20.6 0.9 19.7 Acetochlor 2.4 0.3 2.1 Picloram 0 0.5-0.5 Tetraconazole 0 0.3-0.3

Cheers for Beers Beer has been found to be protective against heart attacks among middle aged men in the Czech Republic. Over 900 men who drank only beer were studied. Those who drank 5 to 9 liters per week were less than half as likely to have a heart attack than those who drank no beer (British Med. J., May 20, 2000).

Acute Toxicity (LD 50 ) oral exposure in rats LD 50 1 LD 50 1 Chemical (mg/kg) Chemical (mg/kg) Botulinum toxin 0.00001 Borax 2 596 Dioxin (TCDD) 0.001 2,4-D 690 Strychnine sulfate 2 Lime/Sulfur 2 820 CARBOFURAN 5 Aspirin 891 Vitamin D3 2 43 Boric acid 2 1,350 Rotenone 2 70 Ferrous sulfate 2 1,500 Nicotine 2 95 ATRAZINE 3,000 Caffeine 127 MALATHION 4,000 DDT 450 NaCl (salt) 4,000 Copper sulfate 2 472 GLYPHOSATE 5,600 Solanine 590 Ethyl alcohol 2 10,000 1 Oral Lethal Dose 50% in rats 2 Approved organic pesticides.

Drinking Water 372 of 699 samples (53.2%) had detectable levels of pesticides. 28 different pesticides out of 150 tested for. 59% were at or below LOQ (usually 3X LOD). Only 16 detected above the LOQ. None exceeded MCLs.

Most common pesticides (699 total samples) Atrazine (258) Metolachlor (233) Metolachlor ESA (198) Atrazine desethyl (154) Metolachlor (152) Simazine (141) Atrazine disospropyl (127) Alachlor ESA (76)