Village of Winnetka Flood Risk Reduction Assessment. Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. (CBBEL) October 11, 2011

Similar documents
June 2014 Village Council Briefing. Willow Road Stormwater Tunnel and Area Drainage Improvements

Public Works and Engineering

City of Elmhurst Comprehensive Flood Plan Golden Meadows Park Flood Storage Facility

The Beckett s Run Experience. Fort Wayne, Indiana

Report for Village of Winnetka, Illinois

City of Elmhurst Comprehensive Flooding Plan Task Force Meeting

DIVISION 5 STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA

Hey and Associates, Inc.

TxDOT Houston District Permit Requirements (Information contained herein is subject to change)

THUNDER BAY AREA DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN

Covell Area Drainage Study Update #2. January 3rd, :30 P.M. Edison Middle School

3.3 Acceptable Downstream Conditions

To: From: Date: Subject: Sherwood Lakes Drainage Alternatives Analysis 1

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. Part PLANT MCINTOSH ASH POND 1 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

SAMPLE DRAINAGE STATEMENT

FROM ROOFTOP TO DRAIN NON-TRADITIONAL APPLICATIONS OF HEC-RAS 2D FROM ROOFTOP. Calibration: A Hands-On Approach to Making a Model Reflect Reality

5/25/2017. Overview. Project Background Information. Project Background Information Modeling Approach Model Development Results Next Steps

DICKINSON BAYOU WATERSHED STEERING COMMITTEE FINAL MEMBER CRITERIA COMPARISON

Prepared for: City of Jeffersonville. November Prepared by

6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff

Underground Stormwater Detention and Rainwater Harvesting System for Northbrook Park District. Brett Holmes, P.E., CPSWQ

DR DRAINAGEWAY THORNTON VALLEY SUBDIVISION OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN SWC OF COLO BLVD & THORNTON PKWY THORNTON, CO

DRAFT. Technical Memorandum. Whitney Road Drainage & Safety Enhancements Phase III Hydraulic Update. Prepared For:

LDS Technical Guidance

5/25/2017. Lumpkin Detention Basin Houston, Texas By Brian Whitney, P.E., CFM Victor Rendon. Lumpkin Basin. Lumpkin Road Overall Description

Mill Creek/Peaks Branch/ State Thomas Drainage Relief Tunnel. Parkdale / Lawnview Avenue Neighborhood April 26, 2016

Report. Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan St. Clair Power Plant St. Clair, Michigan. DTE Energy Company One Energy Plaza, Detroit, MI

APPENDIX J-3. Orcem Stormwater Management and Treatment Facilities Design Summary

DRAFT FOREST VIEW, ILLINOIS SECTION 205 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT APPENDIX E HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS

PRINCESS ANNE DISTRICT STORMWATER PROJECTS

CUYAHOGA COUNTY ENGINEER

Lauren Striegl City of Madison Engineering UPDATE ON CITY OF MADISON S SPECIAL TREATMENT PROJECTS

City of Katy Flood Protection Study (Meeting 3 of 3) October 23, 2017

Introduction to Storm Sewer Design

Dry Creek Flood Control Improvement Project

DRAINAGE BASICS Common Terminology & Reference Tools Drainage Components Determine Existing Conditions Calculate Development Requirements

DRAFT. Jacob Torres, P.E.; Nick Fang, Ph.D., P.E.

Location Drainage Study

SEWRPC Staff Memorandum

Queenston Manor Apartments Part II LID Hydraulic Impact Analysis


10.0 Storm Sewer Systems

MEETING NOTICE & AGENDA VILLAGE BOARD COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. September 25, :10 p.m. Village Hall Council Chambers

Design Example Residential Subdivision

ASHVILLE PARK STORMWATER UPDATE

UNIVERSITY OF OREGON NORTH CAMPUS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROJECT Draft Conditional Use Permit Stormwater, Sanitary Sewer, and Water Analysis Report

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT

Drainage Analysis. Appendix E

VILLAGE OF LIBERTYVILLE SPECIAL WORKSHOP MEETING. Wednesday, September 13, W. Church Street Libertyville, IL :00 p.m.

Hydrologic Study Report for Single Lot Detention Basin Analysis

City of Fort Collins. Spring Creek Place (2105 South College Avenue) Preliminary Drainage Report

FORT COLLINS STORMWATER CRITERIA MANUAL Hydrology Standards (Ch. 5) 1.0 Overview

RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL NORTH ASH MANAGEMENT UNIT MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

Phase II: Proposed (regulated) Impervious in disturbed area (ac) Long Lake Existing Impervious in disturbed area (ac)

Stevenson Creek Watershed Plan and Project Implementation

HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC TABLES AND CURVES

HYDROLOGIC MODELING CONSISTENCY AND SENSITIVITY TO WATERSHED SIZE

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT BOWEN ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

CHECKLIST FOR STREETS, INLETS, AND STORM SEWER DESIGN

Report. Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan Belle River Power Plant East China, Michigan. DTE Energy Company One Energy Plaza, Detroit, MI

City of Katy Pine Forest Public Workshop. November 7, 2017

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL

ENGINEERING REPORT. Blair Lane to Blairmont Drive Drainage Improvements. PREPARED FOR: City of Lebanon Engineering Department

THE CROSSROADS IN WINCHESTER 4. DRAINAGE PLAN. 4. Drainage Plan. a. Drainage Plan Description

Run-on and Run-off Control System Plan

SILVER SPRINGS/RIVER POLLUTION REDUCTION PROJECT IMPROVING THE WATER QUALITY OF THE SILVER SPRINGS ECOSYSTEM

Natalie Creek Flood Control Project (2014 Preliminary Engineering Study)

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY STORMWATER PROGRAM

Aberdeen Airport Drainage Study. Todd Yerdon, PE Al Erickson, PE

CCSD#1 Stormwater Standards

2. DEFINITIONS. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

Review Budget and Timeline for XP-SWMM Phase II Project and Determine Next Steps

DRAINAGE STUDY PHASE 2 REPORT HORRY COUNTY STORMWATER DEPARTMENT HIGHWAY 9 & 57 HORRY COUNTY, SC PREPARED FOR: APRIL 07, 2016 J

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW Mississippi Dr Coon Rapids, MN SQ FT Residence on 0.64 Acre Lot

Wilmette - Background

III. INVENTORY OF EXISTING FACILITIES

Ponds. Pond A water impoundment made by excavating a pit, or constructing a dam or an embankment.

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY STORMWATER PROGRAM

Technical Memorandum

CHAPTER 17: STORM SEWER STANDARDS Introduction Administration Standards 17.1

Title Advanced Hydraulic Modeling to Support Emergency Action Plans

CEDAR RUN WATERSHED ACT 167 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL REPORT

5.15 WATER RESOURCES INTRODUCTION IMPACT DISCUSSION

Project Drainage Report

Storm Sewer Design. Bob Pitt University of Alabama and Shirley Clark Penn State Harrisburg

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

4.2 Cherry Creek & Stillhouse Branch

CONSISTENCY BETWEEN CUHP AND RATIONAL METHODS James C.Y. Guo, PhD, P.E., and Ben Urbonas, P.E., D.WRD 08/04/2008

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY STORMWATER PROGRAM

LAKE LABELLE ENGINEERING REPORT

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

Cokato Lake (86-263) Wright County. Hydrologic Investigation

TOWN LINE BROOK URBAN WATERSHED STUDY MODELING INCREMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS

MORENO MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN

INITIAL INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT MCMANUS ASH POND A (AP-1) 40 CFR

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

CUYAHOGA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CUYAHOGA COUNTY ENGINEER DRAINAGE MANUAL

Transcription:

Village of Winnetka Flood Risk Reduction Assessment October 11, 2011 Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. (CBBEL) Thomas T. Burke, Jr., PhD, PE David Buckley, PE, CFM

Introduction The September 2008 storm event prompted a flood risk reduction assessment of Western Winnetka. Results were presented in September 2009 Remaining portions of the Village were analyzed and presented in July 2011

Purpose of this Study July 23-24 th 2011 storm event produced widespread flooding and prompted the analysis of the Village for the 25-, 50-, and 100-year design storms for all 8 study areas Previous analyses were performed for the 10-year design storm for all 8 study areas

Purpose of the Meeting Present study findings Proposed improvements to reduce flood risk Identify regulatory and permitting requirements Identify intergovernmental partners Obtain Board s input and public comment Next steps Village of Winnetka

Scope of Flood Risk Reduction Assessment Analysis of all 8 study areas for the 25-, 50-, and 100-year design storms Identify drainage improvements to provide the required level of protection for each design storm Develop conceptual plans and cost estimates for drainage projects for each design storm Village of Winnetka

Design Level of Protection Storm sewers sized for 10-year design storm (10% chance of occurring in any given year) Runoff exceeding storm sewer capacity flows overland To obtain greater level of protection: Larger storm sewers, detention, outfalls and pumps 25 yr design = 4% probability of occurring in any given yr 50 yr design = 2% probability of occurring in any given yr 100 yr design= 1% probability of occurring in any given yr Village of Winnetka

Information Analyzed Field investigations by Village and CBBEL staff during and after storm events 857 flood questionnaires Information provided by Village Staff Village of Winnetka storm sewer atlas Cook County aerial topographic mapping Village of Winnetka

Information Analyzed Computer Modeling (XP-SWMM) Dynamic hydrologic / hydraulic analyses Critical duration Data included in modeling Tributary areas Runoff curve numbers Time of concentration Storm sewer network data Overland flow paths Streets and yards Depressional storage areas Village of Winnetka

Overall Drainage P P

North of Willow Road Study Area To Winnetka Avenue Pump

North of Willow Road Study Area 25-year Improvements = $13.0 Million 24 42 P 24 72 54 Underground Vault Underground Vault 10.2 AC-FT CCFPD Property Park District storage Village flood control 72 Underground Vault

North of Willow Road Study Area 50-year Improvements = $ = $14.8 Million 42 48 24 P 24 72 54 60 Underground Vault Underground Vault 10.2 AC-FT 31.2 AC-FT CCFPD Property 72 Park District storage Village flood control Underground Vault

North of Willow Road Study Area 50-year 100-year Improvements = $ = $17.5 Million 48 42 24 P 24 72 60 66 Underground Vault 48 42 42 Underground Vault 31.2 AC-FT 58.5 AC-FT CCFPD Property 72 48 48 Park District storage Village flood control Underground Vault

North of Willow Road Benefits CCFPD approval and land acquisition Park District IDOT MWRDGC Winnetka School District 36 Level of Protection Engineer s Estimate of Probable Cost (Millions) 10-year $6.8 25-year $13.0 50-year $14.8 100-year $17.5

South of Willow Road Study Area Area from North of Willow Road Study Area Mount Pleasant Road Pump P P P Winnetka Avenue Pump DeWindt Road Pump 178 Acres Off-site Area

South of Willow Road Study Area 25-year Improvements = $9.7 million Crow Island Park 15 AC-FT Underground vault P 60 Relocate Mount Pleasant Rd Pump 400 feet of ditch re-grading and lowering 60 Twin 48

South of Willow Road Study Area 50-year Improvements = $12.6 million Crow Island Park 15 AC-FT 40 AC-FT Underground vault P 60 72 Relocate Mount Pleasant Rd Pump 60 72 400 feet of ditch re-grading and lowering Twin 48

South of Willow Road Study Area 100-year Improvements = $17.8 million Crow Island Park 40 AC-FT 65 AC-FT Underground vault P 72 84 Relocate Mount Pleasant Rd Pump 72 84 400 feet of ditch re-grading and lowering Twin 48

South of Willow Road Benefits CCFPD approval and land acquisition MWRDGC US Army Corps of Engineers Level of Protection Engineer s Estimate of Probable Cost (Millions) 10-year $6.8 25-year $13.0 50-year $14.8 100-year $17.5 100-year (above ground storage) $9.6

Underpass Study Area 24 Under RR Main System Junction 18 at Underpass

Underpass Study Area Three Alternatives Alt 1: Increase pipe sizes for each design storm Does not benefit pedestrian underpass Alt 2: Underground storage along Green Bay Rd Benefits both underpasses Reduces required pipe sizes Alt 3: Underground storage at New Trier Does not benefit pedestrian underpass Reduces required pipe sizes Village of Winnetka

Underpass Study Area 25-year Improvements (Alt 1) = $2.9 Million 66 Water quality structure 54 54 High capacity inlets

Underpass Study Area 50-year Improvements (Alt 1) = $3.4 Million 66 84 Water quality structure 54 66 54 66 High capacity inlets

Underpass Study Area 100-year Improvements (Alt 1) = $4.4 Million 84 96 Water quality structure 66 84 66 84 High capacity inlets