Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber House 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario

Similar documents
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development, 361 Tanbark Road Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study EMGO (North Oakville I) Ltd., Town of Oakville, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Building 103 Dundas Street West Oakville, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Brock Road Pickering, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Stacked Townhouse Development Glenashton Drive (Block 55) Oakville, Ontario

Guelph Curling Club Development Traffic Noise Impact Study

Noise Assessment Report Riverside Drive Phase I

Noise Assessment Report Main Street, Residential Site Cambridge, ON

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Hospice 2050 University Avenue East, Waterloo, Ontario

Table of Contents... ii 1. Introduction... 1

DCR Phoenix. Type of Document 1st Submission. Project Name 256 Rideau Street Ottawa, Ontario. Project Number OTT A0. Prepared By: Nicole Ruyf

Noise Assessment Report

Noise Feasibility Study, McGibbon Condominium 71 Main Street South Georgetown, Ontario

Prepared for: Gapatas Inc Sherwoodtowne Boulevard, Unit 106 Mississauga, ON L4Z 1Y5. Our File No:

Noise Assessment Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES

Noise Assessment Report

Fayez & Patrizia Ghadban

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Stacked Townhouse Development, 3060 and 3072 Sixth Line, Town of Oakville, Ontario

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT RIVERSIDE SOUTH PHASE 9-4 CITY OF OTTAWA

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 12 HAMILTON AVENUE NORTH OTTAWA, ON.

Noise Feasibility Study 2120 Hurontario Street and Grange Drive City of Mississauga, Ontario

NOISE CONTROL STUDY FOR PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND...

Noise Feasibility Study Framgard Apartments (South Block) NW corner of Britannia Road and Regional Road 25 Town of Milton, Ontario

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Place Vanier Édifice AEFO

Noise Control Feasibility Study 173 / 175 / 177 Preston Street Ottawa, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed 4 Storey Apartment Building 226 Woolwich Street South Breslau, Regional Municipality of Waterloo

Noise Assessment & Control Transportation Noise Assessment 303 Lebreton Street South, 460 St. Laurent Boulevard Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa, Ontario

Traffic Noise Assessment Baseline Road Ottawa, Ontario

Avalon Encore Stage Tenth Line Road Infusion Terrace, Block 233 City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Impact Assessment

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 47 HAVELOCK STREET OTTAWA, ON.

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario

Mann Avenue Development 87 Mann Avenue Noise Control Study

Table of Contents. 174 Forward Avenue SACL Project #B7-170 Feb 22, Page ii

Appendix K. Environmental Noise Assessment

671 Victoria Road North City of Guelph Traffic Noise Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

Brigil Homes. Noise Impact Assessment. Type of Document Site Plan Submission. Project Name Petrie s Landing, Phase 2. Project Number OTT A0

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment Chapel Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Traffic Noise Assessment. 5 Orchard Drive. Stittsville, Ontario

Traffic Noise Assessment. 333 Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario

Noise Control Study. for. Avalon Public School Portobello Boulevard at Stormwind Avenue in Ottawa, Ontario. Revision 1

REP Fotenn Bank Phase 1 Feasibility Noise Study with Building Component AmendmentPage 1 of 21

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 47 HAVELOCK STREET OTTAWA, ON. REVISED with ADDENDUM for ROOFTOP OUTDOOR LIVING AREA

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Kemsley Farm St. Thomas, Ontario

Transportation Noise & Vibration Assessment Scott Street. Ottawa, Ontario

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT RIVERSIDE SOUTH PHASE 13 CITY OF OTTAWA

18 McArthur Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario Proposed Development Noise Study Report. Prepared for: Takyan Consulting By: ARCH-Nova Design Inc.

ASSESSMENT OF THE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS AT THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 364 ST. PATRICK STREET

ASSESSMENT OF THE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS AT THE PROPOSED HOLIDAY INN DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE

TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT 20 MARK AVENUE

Roadway Traffic Noise and Vibration Assessment. The Bridge Wesleyan Church Addition. Ottawa, Ontario

UAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD

NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY. MINTO COMMUNITIES INC. Clarke Lands CITY OF OTTAWA

Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario

MINTO COMMUNITIES INC GREENBANK ROAD NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY

Environmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 92 Plains Road East

DETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY OF PROPOSED PHASE 2 CONDOMINIUMS AT 655 & 755 ANAND PRIVATE OTTAWA Ontario Inc.

Environmental Noise Assessment Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 1208 OLD MONTREAL ROAD

Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study 1 and 15 Stevenson St & 8 William St Guelph, Ontario

3.5.1 Outdoor Living Areas (OLAs) Indoor Sound Levels... 8

Noise Feasibility Study 2480 Old Bronte Road, Oakville, Ontario

Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

Merivale Road Residential Development 1683 Merivale Road Noise Control Study

Noise Control Study. Proposed Mixed-use Development. 112 Montreal Road City of Ottawa. Prepared for: DCR Phoenix Developments

Stationary Noise Assessment. 70 Richmond Road. Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Ironwood Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario

R. BOUWMEESTER & ASSOCIATES

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT THE MEADOWS IN HALF MOON BAY PHASE 5

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT MCGANN 9a LANDS BANK STREET LEITRIM DEVELOPMENT AREA

Environmental Noise Assessment 1020, 1024, 1028, 1032 & 1042 Sixth Line Oakville, ON

NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed 6-storey Seniors Condominium 7480 Derry Road West Milton, Ontario

Proposed Residential/Institutional Development Independent and Assisted Care Senior s Residence 190 Richmond Road Ottawa, ON K1Z 6W6

Traffic and Stationary Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Lakeside Village Plaza 5353 Lakeshore Road Burlington, Ontario

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT CLARIDGE HOMES MAPLE GROVE LANDS 1981 MAPLE GROVE ROAD KANATA WEST

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Hotel Development, Living Waters Resort Collingwood, Ontario

SS WILSON ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers

Draft Noise Abatement Guidelines

Attachment A: Background Noise Assessment for Brandon Thermal Generating Station

1. Introduction Site Noise Impact... 1

Noise Abatement Guidelines. Regional Official Plan Guidelines

Rail Traffic Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Proposed Zone Change for 6 Residential Lots Inkerman Street Guelph, Ontario

REP Atelier 292 OCH Phase 2 Noise Study Page 1 of 26

Burnett Lands Greenbank Road. Noise Impact Feasibility Report

Appendix M. Noise Assessment

DRAFT REPORT. Boyne East Catholic Secondary School #3CSS. Noise Impact Study. Louis St. Laurent Avenue, Milton. SACL #SW18060A0 December 11, 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION SITE AND AREA DESCRIPTION...1

Tri-County Aggregates Ltd. 92 Kenhar Drive North York, Ontario, Canada M9L 1N2

The anticipated critical noise receptors and their locations are identified as follows and are shown on Figure 3:

ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ON THE PROPOSED AVALON CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED PLANTAGENET ASPHALT PLANT

23, 33 & 39 DEERFOX DRIVE NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY

Environmental Noise Feasibility Assessment Proposed Guelph Woods Development Guelph, ON

Transcription:

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber ouse 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario Prepared for: City Park (Old Barber) omes Inc. 950 Nashville Road Kleinburg, Ontario, L0J 1C0 Prepared by Victor arcia, EIT and Sheeba Paul, MEng, PEng June 6, 2016

Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY... 1 2 SITE DESCRIPTION AND SOURCES OF SOUND... 2 3 CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTABLE SOUND LEVELS... 2 3.1 Road Traffic Noise Criteria... 2 4 TRAFFIC SOUND LEVEL ASSESSMENT... 4 4.1 Road Traffic Data... 4 4.2 Road Traffic Noise Predictions... 4 5 TRAFFIC NOISE RECOMMENDATIONS... 5 5.1 Outdoor Living Areas... 5 5.2 Indoor Living Areas... 6 5.3 Building Façade Constructions... 6 5.4 Warning Clauses... 7 6 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS... 8 6.1 Implementation... 9 Figure 1: Key Plan Figure 2: Proposed Site Plan Figure 3: Site Plan Showing Acoustic Barrier and Ventilation Requirements Appendix A: Road Traffic Data Appendix B: Sample STAMSON 5.04 Output

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 1 Old Barber ouse, 5155 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, ON June 6, 2016 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY C Engineering was retained by City Park (Old Barber) omes Inc. to perform a noise feasibility study for a proposed residential development located at 5155 Mississauga Road, in the City of Mississauga, Ontario. The residential development site is proposed to include 30 units comprised of: 1 freehold detached dwelling; 8 freehold townhouses; 1 common element condo detached dwelling; 16 common element condo townhouse dwellings; and 4 two storey townhouse units within the Old Barber ouse. The analysis includes an assessment of road traffic noise on the proposed residential dwellings in accordance with Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) guidelines. The study is required by the City of Mississauga as part of the planning and approvals process. Road traffic data was obtained through correspondence with the City of Mississauga. The data was provided in the form of ultimate road traffic data and was used to predict future traffic sound levels at the façades of the proposed residential buildings and in rear yard outdoor living areas. The predicted sound levels were compared to the guidelines of the MOECC and the City of Mississauga. The sound level predictions indicate that the future road traffic sound levels will exceed MOECC guidelines at the dwelling units closest to Mississauga Road. An acoustic barrier is required for the OLA of the single detached dwelling adjacent to Mississauga Road. Forced air ventilation systems with ductwork sized for the future installation of central air conditioning by the occupant will be required for the dwellings closest to Mississauga Road at the north end of the site. For all dwelling units in the development, building constructions meeting the minimum requirements of the Ontario Building Code will provide sufficient acoustical insulation. Warning clauses are also recommended to inform future occupants of the traffic noise impacts.

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 2 Old Barber ouse, 5155 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, ON June 6, 2016 2 SITE DESCRIPTION AND SOURCES OF SOUND Figure 1 shows a key plan which identifies the location of the proposed residential development. The residential development is located at the Old Barber ouse Site, 5155 Mississauga Road in the City of Mississauga, Ontario. The proposed site plan prepared by Flanagan Beresford & Patterson Architects last revised on May 31, 2016 is included as Figure 2. The residential development site is proposed to include 30 units comprised of: 1 freehold detached dwelling; 8 freehold townhouses; 1 common element condo detached dwelling; 16 common element condo townhouse dwellings; and 4 two storey townhouse units within the Old Barber ouse. C Engineering personnel visited the site in February 2016. The surrounding lands are residential. To the east of the site there is a place of worship (PORTICO a community church). Sounds from these uses were not audible at the subject site over road traffic sounds. Mississauga Road is a 3 lane roadway (1 lane in each direction and a turning lane) in this area. There are no significant sources of stationary noise within 300 m of the subject site. 3 CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTABLE SOUND LEVELS 3.1 Road Traffic Noise Criteria uidelines for acceptable levels of road traffic noise impacting residential developments are given in the MOECC publication NPC-300, Environmental Noise uideline Stationary and Transportation Sources Approval and Planning, Part C release date October 21, 2013 and are listed in Table 1 below. The values in Table 1 are energy equivalent (average) sound levels [LEQ] in units of A weighted decibels [dba].

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 3 Old Barber ouse, 5155 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, ON June 6, 2016 Table 1: Road Traffic Noise Criteria Daytime L EQ(16 hour) Nighttime L EQ(8 hour) Outside Bedroom Windows 55 dba 50 dba Outdoor Living Areas 55 dba -- Inside Living/Dining Rooms 45 dba 45 dba Inside Bedrooms 45 dba 40 dba Daytime refers to the period between 07:00 and 23:00. Nighttime refers to the time period between 23:00 and 07:00. The term "Outdoor Living Area" (OLA) is used in reference to an outdoor patio, backyard, terrace, children's playground or other area where passive recreation is expected to occur. The guidelines in the MOECC publication allow the sound level limit in an Outdoor Living Area to be exceeded by up to 5 dba, without mitigation, if warning clauses are placed in the property agreements, offers of purchase and sale and rental agreements to the properties. Where future OLA sound levels exceed 60 dba, physical mitigation is required to reduce the OLA sound level to below 60 dba and as close to 55 dba as technically, economically and administratively feasible. A central air conditioning system as an alternative means of ventilation to open windows is required for dwellings where future nighttime sound levels outside bedroom windows will exceed 60 dba or future daytime sound levels outside living/dining room windows will exceed 65 dba. Forced-air ventilation with ducts sized to accommodate the future installation of air conditioning by the occupant is required when nighttime sound levels at bedroom windows will be in the range of 51 to 60 dba or when daytime sound levels at living/dining room windows will be in the range of 56 to 65 dba. Building components such as walls, windows and doors must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria when the nighttime plane of window sound level will be greater than 60 dba or the daytime plane of window sound level will be greater than 65 dba. The use of warning clauses to notify future residents of possible excesses is also required.

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 4 Old Barber ouse, 5155 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, ON June 6, 2016 4 TRAFFIC SOUND LEVEL ASSESSMENT 4.1 Road Traffic Data Ultimate road traffic information for Mississauga Road was obtained from City of Mississauga personnel and is provided in Appendix A. A speed limit of 50 km/h was used for Mississauga Road. A commercial vehicle percentage of 2% was used, split into 1.1% medium trucks and 0.9% heavy trucks, along with a day-night split of 90%/10%. Table 2 summarizes the traffic volumes used in the analysis. Table 2: Ultimate Road Traffic Data Road Name Cars Medium Trucks eavy Trucks Total Mississauga Road Daytime 17 640 198 162 18 000 Nighttime 1 960 22 18 2 000 Total 19 600 220 180 20 000 4.2 Road Traffic Noise Predictions Future traffic sound levels were predicted using STAMSON version 5.04, a computer algorithm developed by the MOECC. Sample STAMSON output is included in Appendix C. Sound levels were predicted at the plane of the living/dining room windows during the daytime and at the plane of the bedroom windows during nighttime hours to investigate ventilation requirements. The results of these predictions, without mitigation, are summarized in Table 3.

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 5 Old Barber ouse, 5155 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, ON June 6, 2016 Prediction Location Table 3: Predicted Sound Levels, Without Mitigation, [dba] Description Daytime in OLA L EQ-16 hr Daytime at the Façade L EQ-16 hr Nighttime at the Facade L EQ-8 hr Block 1 Flanking exposure to Mississauga Rd. 61 65 61 Block 2 Some backing exposure to Mississauga Unit 2 Rd. 57 57 50 Lot 2 Flanking exposure to Mississauga Rd. 56 55 <50 Lot 1 Some backing exposure to Mississauga Rd. 58 60 54 Block 4 Quadplex with some exposure to Mississauga Rd -- 59 52 5 TRAFFIC NOISE RECOMMENDATIONS The predictions indicate that the future traffic sound levels will exceed MOECC guidelines at the dwellings closest to Mississauga Road. Recommendations to address these excesses are discussed below. 5.1 Outdoor Living Areas The predicted daytime sound levels in the OLA of Block 1 with flanking exposure to Mississauga Road will be 61 dba, which is 6 dba in excess of the MOECC s limit of 55 dba. Physical mitigation in the form of an acoustic barrier is required. A 2.0 m high acoustic wall will reduce the sound level to 55 dba. The predicted daytime sound levels in the OLA s of Lots 1 and 2, and Block 2 (Unit 1) with some flanking exposure to Mississauga Road will be up to 58 dba, which is up to 3 dba in excess of the MOECC s limit of 55 dba. The 3 dba sound level excesses are acceptable to the MOECC, if they are acceptable to the municipality with the use of appropriate warning clauses. As a general note, an acoustic barrier may be a combination of an acoustic wall and an earth berm. The wall component of the barrier should be of a solid construction with a surface density of no less than 20 kg/m 2. The walls may be constructed from a variety of materials such as wood, brick, precast concrete or other concrete/wood composite systems provided that it is free of gaps or cracks. The heights and extents of the barriers should be chosen to reduce the sound levels in the OLA s to

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 6 Old Barber ouse, 5155 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, ON June 6, 2016 below 60 dba and as close to 55 dba as is technically, administratively and economically feasible, subject to the approval of the municipality respecting any applicable fence height by-laws. The predicted daytime sound levels in the OLA s of the remainder of the lots are less than 55 dba, thus physical mitigation will not be required. 5.2 Indoor Living Areas Provision for the Future Installation of Air Conditioning On Blocks 1, 2 (unit 2), 4 (unit 18, 19) and Lot 1, the predicted sound levels at the plane of the windows are between 56 and 65 dba during the daytime and between 51 and 60 dba during the nighttime hours. These units will require forced air ventilation systems with ductwork sized for the future provision of central air conditioning systems by the occupant. This requirement is typically satisfied through the installation of forced air heating systems. These units are indicated in Figure 3. The remaining lots have no specific ventilation requirements. 5.3 Building Façade Constructions All the lots in the development will have nighttime sound levels less than 60 dba and daytime sound levels less than 65 dba. Any double glazed window construction and exterior wall construction meeting the minimum requirements of the Ontario Building Code (OBC) will provide adequate sound insulation for all the dwelling units in the development.

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 7 Old Barber ouse, 5155 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, ON June 6, 2016 5.4 Warning Clauses The MOECC guidelines recommend that warning clauses be included in the property and tenancy agreements and offers of purchase and sale for all units with anticipated traffic sound level excesses. Examples are provided below. Suggested wording for future dwellings with sound level excesses the MOECC criteria is given below: Type A: Purchasers and tenants are advised that sound levels due to increasing road traffic may occasionally interfere with some increasing road traffic may occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels activities exceed the Municipality s and the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change s noise criteria. Suggested wording for future dwellings for which physical mitigation has been provided is given below. Type B: Purchasers/tenants are advised that despite the inclusion of noise control features in the development and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing road and rail traffic may occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the City s and the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change s noise criteria. The acoustical barrier as installed shall be maintained, repaired or replaced by the owner. Any maintenance, repair or replacement shall be with the same material, to the same standards and having the same colour and appearance of the original. Suitable wording for future dwellings with minor excesses and requiring forced air ventilation systems is given below. Type C: This dwelling unit has been fitted with a forced air heating system and the ducting etc., was sized to accommodate central air conditioning. Installation of central air conditioning will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the Municipality s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. (Note: The location and installation of the outdoor air conditioning device should be done so as to minimize the noise impacts and comply with criteria of MOECC publication NPC-300, as applicable.)

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 8 Old Barber ouse, 5155 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, ON June 6, 2016 These sample clauses are provided by the MOECC as examples and can be modified by the Municipality as required. 6 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS In summary, C Engineering has reviewed the site plan and performed calculations to determine the potential road traffic noise impact on the residential properties with respect to MOECC guidelines. The following are the recommendations. 1. An acoustic barrier is required for the OLA of Block 1. 2. Forced air ventilation systems with ductwork sized for the future installation of central air conditioning system will be required for dwelling units on Blocks 1, 2 (unit 2), 4 (unit 18, 19) and Lot 1. The location, installation and sound ratings of the air conditioning devices should comply with NPC-300, as applicable. 3. Building constructions meeting the minimum requirements of the Ontario Building Code will provide sufficient acoustical insulation for the indoor spaces for all the lots in the subdivision. 4. Warning clauses should be used to inform future residents of the traffic noise issues. The following table summarizes the noise control recommendations and noise warning clauses for the lots in the proposed subdivision. Please see Figures 2 and 3, for reference.

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Residential Development Page 9 Old Barber ouse, 5155 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, ON June 6, 2016 Table 4: Summary of Noise Control Requirements and Noise Warning Clauses Lot Acoustic Barrier *Ventilation Requirements Type of Warning Clause Building Façade Constructions Block 1 Forced Air B, C OBC Blocks 2 (unit 2) and 4 (unit -- Forced Air A, C OBC 18, 19), Lot 2 Remaining Dwellings -- -- -- OBC Notes: -- no specific requirement OBC meeting the minimum requirements of the Ontario Building Code * The location, installation and sound rating of the air conditioning condensers must be compliant with MOECC uideline NPC-300, as applicable. 6.1 Implementation To ensure that the noise recommendations outlined above are fully implemented, it is recommended that: 1. Prior to assumption of the subdivision, the Municipality s building inspector or a Professional Engineer qualified to perform acoustical engineering services in the Province of Ontario should certify that the noise control measures have been properly incorporated, installed and constructed.

N BLOCK 1 (condo) Unit 1 2356 BLOCK 3 (condo) BLOCK 2 (condo) Unit 2 Unit 8 2060 Unit 6 Unit 7 2060 2060 Unit 4 Unit 5 2060 2060 Unit 3 2060 Unit 9 2060 VB2 1 Unit 21 1275 2 5 3 6 7 4 8 LOT 2 2085 2095 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 LOT 6 LOT 7 BLOCK 1 (freehold) LOT 9 LOT 8 2085 V1 VB1 LOT 1 Unit 16 Unit 17 2220 Unit 20 1275 BLOCK 4 (condo) Unit 19 1196 Unit 14 Unit 15 Unit 18 1196 Unit 12 Unit 13 Unit 10 Unit 11 2220 Figure 2 - Proposed Site Plan V2 V3 V4

N BLOCK 1 (condo) Unit 1 2356 BLOCK 3 (condo) BLOCK 2 (condo) Unit 2 Unit 8 2060 Unit 6 Unit 7 2060 2060 Unit 4 Unit 5 2060 2060 Unit 3 2060 Unit 9 2060 Unit 16 Unit 17 2220 V1 V2 V3 V4 Unit 20 1275 VB1 VB2 BLOCK 4 (condo) Unit 19 1196 Unit 14 Unit 15 Unit 18 1196 Unit 12 Unit 13 Unit 10 Unit 11 2220 1 Unit 21 1275 2 5 3 6 7 4 8 LOT 2 LOT 1 2085 2095 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 LOT 6 LOT 7 BLOCK 1 (freehold) LOT 9 LOT 8 2085 LEEND Forced air heating with ducts sized for the future installation of air conditioning by the occupant Acoustic barrier required Figure 3 - Proposed Site Plan Showing Barrier and Ventilation Requirements

APPENDIX A Road Traffic Data

Date: 29-Jan-16 REQUESTED BY: Name: Victor arcia Company C Engineering Fax#: ( ) - 0 PREPARED BY: Name: Loudel Uy Tel#: (905) 615-3200 Location: Look Up ID#: 347 NOISE REPORT FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Mississauga Road, North of Eglinton Avenue W AADT: 20,000 # of Lanes: 2 % Trucks: 2% Medium/eavy Trucks Ratio: 55/45 Day/Night Traffic Split: 90/10 Posted Speed Limit: 50 km/h radient of Road: <2% Ultimate R O W: 20m ON SITE TRAFFIC DATA Specific Street Names Specific Mississauga Road Comments: Ultimate Traffic data only.

APPENDIX B Sample STAMSON 5.04 Output

1OLA.TXT STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 13-05-2016 09:42:10 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: 1ola.te Time Period: 16 hours Description: OLA of lot 1 with flanking exposure to Mississauga Rd Road data, segment # 1: Mississauga ----------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 17640 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 198 veh/timeperiod * eavy truck volume : 162 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 1: Mississauga --------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg -45.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 18.85 m Receiver height : 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -90.00 deg Angle2 : -45.00 deg Barrier height : 7.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 3.50 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 Road data, segment # 2: Mississauga ----------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 17640 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 198 veh/timeperiod * eavy truck volume : 162 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 2: Mississauga --------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -45.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 18.85 m Receiver height : 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -45.00 deg Angle2 : 90.00 deg Barrier height : 2.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 5.90 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Mississauga -------------------------------- Page 1

Source height = 0.97 m 1OLA.TXT Barrier height for grazing incidence ------------------------------------ Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of eight (m)! eight (m)! eight (m)! Barrier Top (m) ------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 0.97! 1.50! 1.40! 1.40 ROAD (0.00 + 40.39 + 0.00) = 40.39 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj.Adj B.Adj SubLeq ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -90-45 0.26 64.93 0.00-1.25-7.32 0.00 0.00-15.98 40.39 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Segment Leq : 40.39 dba Results segment # 2: Mississauga -------------------------------- Source height = 0.97 m Barrier height for grazing incidence ------------------------------------ Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of eight (m)! eight (m)! eight (m)! Barrier Top (m) ------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 0.97! 1.50! 1.34! 1.34 ROAD (0.00 + 54.52 + 0.00) = 54.52 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj.Adj B.Adj SubLeq ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -45 90 0.56 64.93 0.00-1.54-2.16 0.00 0.00-6.71 54.52 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Segment Leq : 54.52 dba Total Leq All Segments: 54.68 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES: 54.68 dba Page 2

2.TXT STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 13-05-2016 09:43:33 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: 2.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Lot with some backing exposure to Mississauga Rd Road data, segment # 1: Mississauga (day/night) ----------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 17640/1960 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 198/22 veh/timeperiod * eavy truck volume : 162/18 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 20000 Percentage of Annual rowth : 0.00 Number of Years of rowth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 1.10 eavy Truck % of Total Volume : 0.90 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 90.00 Data for Segment # 1: Mississauga (day/night) --------------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 27.00 / 27.00 m Receiver height : 4.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Mississauga (day) -------------------------------------- Source height = 0.97 m ROAD (0.00 + 56.54 + 0.00) = 56.54 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj.Adj B.Adj SubLeq ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 90 0.59 64.93 0.00-4.05-4.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.54 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Segment Leq : 56.54 dba Total Leq All Segments: 56.54 dba Results segment # 1: Mississauga (night) ---------------------------------------- Source height = 0.97 m ROAD (0.00 + 50.01 + 0.00) = 50.01 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj.Adj B.Adj SubLeq ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 90 0.59 58.40 0.00-4.05-4.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.01 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 1

Segment Leq : 50.01 dba 2.TXT Total Leq All Segments: 50.01 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 56.54 dba (NIT): 50.01 dba Page 2