Atilla. Integrated pear psylla control

Similar documents
DOSE ADJUSTMENT IN FRUIT ORCHARDS IN FRANCE

MusaCare CP increases banana yield and stimulates the natural resistance against Black Sigatoka. Ceradis Creates Safer Food

EFFICACY EVALUATION OF FUNGICIDE PROSARO AGAINST SCLEROTINIA DISEASE IN TURNIP RAPE

Fungicides for sclerotinia stem rot control in winter oilseed rape

Cooperative Extension, University of California FRUIT & NUT NOTES IN THIS ISSUE:

2014 YWTG. Disease and Insects

Biology, Ecology and Management of Onion Thrips in Onion

Organic Apples OPM.oo3

Amount per REI 2 PHI3. Precautions and Notes Choices. (days) dormant oil

Foliar Nutrition: an Extra Bonus for the Rice Grower. Yoav Ronen, Joshua Golovaty and Eran Barak, Haifa group

The Past and Present of Pear Protection Against the Pear Psylla, Cacopsylla pyri L.

AN UPDATE ON SPOT FORM NET BLOTCH (SFNB) IN THE NORTHERN REGION

Premium protection from Powdery mildew. DuPont Talendo fungicide

Summary. Introduction

Integrated Pest Management

Current Developments on Environmental Risk Assessment for Plant Protection Products in Europe NTA including bees

Now in an improved EcoSolution *

IPM THROUGHOUT THE SEASON

Fungicide performance in oilseed rape 2014

What Copper Formulations are Best for Tree Fruit Applications?

MTT Agrifood Research Finland Trial Report 2012 Herbicides, fungicides and insecticides

Residues on food items for birds and mammal. Robert Luttik, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, NL

Evaluation of Experimental Nematicides for the Management of the Reniform Nematode in North Alabama, 2013

Wireworm Meeting PEI. 14 March Mark McMillan Business Manager

Ornamental. Product Catalog

Tomato Insects to be Looking For

Control of apple scab by curative applications of biocontrol agents

Pesticide Formulations and Adjuvants. Montana State University Pesticide Safety Education Program

Mono Potassium Phosphate ( PeaK ) foliar application for Rice in the Red River Delta of Vietnam

Striped Cucumber Beetle Management with Plant and Microbial Metabolites Shelby Fleischer 1, Tim Elkner 2, and Maggie Lewis 1

Soybean IPM Elements Revised March, 2012

SMart On-Farm Part 1. Michigan Soybean Committee, PO Box 287, Frankenmuth, MI FRANKENMUTH, MI PERMIT 20 PAID US POSTAGE NON-PROFIT

Presented by : Digambar Singh

Spot form net blotch management

Leaf miners. Leaf miner types. Leaf miner or Scorch? blotch. serpentine

MTT Agrifood Research Finland Trial Report 2011 Herbicides, fungicides and insecticides

Pest Management in Organic Systems. Juan R. Anciso Extension Vegetable Specialist Texas AgriLife Extension Service

SAMPLE. 5 litres œ MAPP PCS Warning

For the control of certain disease in bananas, nectarines and wheat as specified in the Directions For Use.

Brian Lang, Extension Agronomist, Iowa State University; Kenneth Pecinovsky, Farm Superintendent, Iowa State University Northeast Research Farm

IR-4 NOMINATION REPORT Entomology Efficacy/Crop Safety (E/CS) Data Requirements Only

Efficacy and Degradation of Field Applied Insecticide Residues to Economically Control Spotted Wing Drosophila in Mature Highbush Blueberry, 2012

Organic pest and disease control

DiPel Biological Insecticide

GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATION OF PESTICIDE BIO EFFICACY TRIAL REPORTS

Insects in Vegetables: A Review of 2011 and What to Know for Rick Foster Purdue University

Challenges for increasing crop productivity: Farmer & scientist solutions

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF TEMIK ON CITRUS IN THE INDIAN RIVER AREA IN SOUTHEASTERN FLORIDA. Lindsey Blakeley, Richard Weldon, and Gary Fairchild

EVALUATION OF HERBICIDES IN CARAWAY IN HARVEST YEAR, Loimaa

The Control of the Nun Moth (Lymantria monacha L.) in Poland: A Comparison of Two Strategies

Use of Benfuracarb in the Integrated Management of Diamondback Moth

Your guide to weed control in new pasture

Workshop Efficacy Requirements and Evaluation of Plant Protection Products based on Low-Risk Active Substances, Ede (NL), /07

Managing sorghum-sugarcane aphid in forage sorghum

TBZ WG Page 1 of 26. REGISTRATION REPORT Part A. Risk Management

EVALUATION OF ATTRIBUT SUPER AT LOWER DOSES IN WHEAT IN 2011

Apricot Year-round IPM Program (Reviewed 10/14) Annual Checklist

Managing Pistachio Nutrition. Patrick Brown Muhammad Ismail Siddiqui

AGRONOMIC EVALUATION OF ALFALFA CULTIVARS IN RIO GRANDE DO SUL, BRASIL. (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brasil,

Establishment of Economic Thresholds for Olive Moth, Prays oleae (Bern.) in Tras-Os-Montes Region

Vegetable Gardening and Season Extension

Rice Insecticide Seed Treatments:

CAUTION KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN READ SAFETY DIRECTIONS BEFORE OPENING OR USING. Nufarm. ACTIVE CONSTITUENT: 125 g/l EPOXICONAZOLE

Interaction between fungicide program and in-crop nitrogen timing for the control of yellow leaf spot (YLS) in mid-may sown wheat

Potential of Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus (NPV) and Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) for Spodoptera Control in Yellow Granex Onion

THE SELECTIVITY OF THE TANK MIXTURE OF ATTRIBUT SUPER AND THE PLANT GROWTH REGULATOR IN SPRING WHEAT

Active Oxygen Tablets

Dose rate expression and adjustment for vine

Main apple growing regions

2018 Engenia Herbicide Stewardship Training

Effect of Monocrotophos on the Leaf Eating Caterpillar, Opisina arenosella Walk, when Injected into the Trunk of the Coconut Palm.

INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT

CONTROL OF BLACK SPOT OF AVOCADO BY ORGANIC AND INORGANIC FUNGICIDES

Effect of Bacillus subtilis and fungicide sprays for control of preharvest diseases of avocado

Proceedings of the 3 rd Annual Nitrogen: Minnesota s Grand Challenge & Compelling Opportunity Conference

Economic catalogue for agricultural products Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development

Wetting Agents QUALIBRA Deeper Thinking

Forest Pest Management with Micronair Rotary Atomisers

Integrated Pest Management pilot workshop for advisors

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALDICARB ON CITRUS IN THE INDIAN RIVER AREA IN SOUTHEASTERN FLORIDA. Lindsey Blakeley, Richard Weldon, and Gary Fairchild

Open Questions on the Risks and Benefits of Copper Sprays on Tree Fruits

Austria: Experiences with the Zonal evaluation procedure Applying Regulation (EC) No.1107/2009

Agricultural College at Križevci, Croatia; e mail:

33. Fate of pesticides in soil and plant.

USAID Pesticide Procedures

MAPP The (COSHH) Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations may apply to the use of this product at work. SAFETY PRECAUTIONS

Fungicide effects on wheat at Conmurra

Foliar applied insecticide control of the Soybean Aphid (2011) Summary Background

Crop Rotation, Prosaro Fungicide, Seed Treatment and Cultivar as Management Tools to Control Disease on 2-Row Barley, Langdon, 2009

Foliar Fertilization of Field Crops

Soil Amendment and Foliar Application Trial 2016 Full Report

Grower Summary HNS 186. Control of downy mildew on shrub and herbaceous plants. Annual 2013

Copper on Winter Wheat Project

Preliminary results show rain roofs to have remarkable effect on diseases of apples

Bertie County Ag News

Procure 50WS. Agricultural Fungicide KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN CAUTION

EFSA Draft Guidance Document on the Risk Assessment of Plant Protection Products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees) 1

Nutgrass management in sugarcane

Cranberry Station Newsletter

Pesticide Product/acre REI PHI Comments Beta cyfluthrin R. 7 d grazing and hay harvest. 12 hr

Transcription:

Atilla Integrated pear psylla control

Atilla New pear psylla product Contact agent 85 % potassium bicarbonate (KHCO 3 ) = baking powder Especially formulated for efficacy against Pear Psylla Dose : 5 kg/ha (= 3,3 kg/ha leaf wall area) Block treatment : 3-4 times per generation In summer and after harvest

Formulation The formulation determines the efficacy of bicarbonate solubility ph contact honeydew Other formulation than fungicidal products!

Formulation

Formulation GEP trial - Belgium 2010 (Pcfruit) Pear cv. Conference Objects Product Rate (kg/ha a.s.) Application Untreated - - Potassium bicarbonate (99,5 %) 4,0 10/06-18/06-01/07 Atilla 3,0 10/06-18/06-01/07 Assessment Number of young larvae (L1-L3) on shoots

Formulation GEP trial - Belgium 2010 (Pcfruit) 140 Number L1-L3/10 shoots 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 8 DA-A 12 DA-B 8 DA-C Untreated K-bicarbonate 4,0 kg/ha a.s. Atilla 3,0 kg/ha a.s.

Triple action Reduces egg deposit Insecticidal on larvae Reduces black pears

Triple action Reduces egg deposit Insecticidal on larvae Reduces black pears

Repellent effect GEP trial - Spain 2010 (Anadiag Ibérica) Pear cv. Conference Objects Product Rate Application Untreated inside trial - - Untreated 10 m outside trial - - Vertimec 0,75 L/ha 16/07 Atilla 3,5 kg/ha 16/07-23/07-30/07-06/08 Assessments Number of eggs (total) on shoots Number of young larvae (L1-L3) on shoots

Repellent effect GEP trial - Spain 2010 (Anadiag Ibérica) 35 Number of eggs/10 shoots 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Untreated inside trial Untreated 10 m outside Vertimec Atilla O DA-A 7 DA-A 7 DA-B 7 DA-C 3 DA-D 10 DA-D

Repellent effect GEP trial - Spain 2010 (Anadiag Ibérica) 70 Number L1-L3/10 shoots 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Untreated inside trial Untreated 10 m outside Vertimec Atilla O DA-A 7 DA-A 7 DA-B 7 DA-C 3 DA-D 10 DA-D

Repellent effect GEP trial - Italy 2012 (Ferrara - Anadiag Italia) Pear cv. Abate Fetel Objects Product Rate Application Untreated - - Vertimec 0,75 L/ha 31/07 Atilla 3,5 kg/ha 24/07-31/07-07/08-14/08 Atilla 7,0 kg/ha 24/07-31/07-07/08-14/08 Assessment Number of eggs (total) on shoots

Repellent effect GEP trial - Italy 2012 (Ferrara - Anadiag Italia) Product Efficacy on eggs (%) 10 DA-D Untreated - Vertimec Atilla 3,5 kg/ha Atilla 7,0 kg/ha 10 b 81 a 93 a Significant reduction of new egg deposit

Repellent effect GEP trial - Belgium 2010 (Pcfruit) Pear cv. Conference Objects Product Rate Application Untreated - - Calypso 0,375 L/ha 01/10 Atilla 5,0 kg/ha 01/10-08/10-15/10 Assessment Number of eggs (total) on shoots

Repellent effect GEP trial - Belgium 2010 (Pcfruit) 350 Number of eggs/10 shoots 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 01/10 08/10 15/10 22/10 Untreated Calypso Atilla

Triple action Reduces egg deposit Insecticidal on larvae Reduces black pears

Insecticidal effect GEP trial - Italy 2012 (Ferrara - Anadiag Italia) Pear cv. Abate Fetel Objects Product Rate Application Untreated - - Vertimec 0,75 L/ha 31/07 Atilla 3,5 kg/ha 24/07-31/07-07/08-14/08 Atilla 7,0 kg/ha 24/07-31/07-07/08-14/08 Assessments Number of young larvae (L1-L3) on shoots Number of old larvae (L4-L5) on shoots

Insecticidal effect GEP trial - Italy 2012 (Ferrara - Anadiag Italia) 20 Number L1-L3/10 shoots 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 24/07 31/07 07/08 14/08 Untreated Vertimec Atilla 3,5 kg/ha Atilla 7,0 kg/ha

Insecticidal effect GEP trial - Italy 2012 (Ferrara - Anadiag Italia) 9 Number L4-L5/10 shoots 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 24/07 31/07 07/08 14/08 Untreated Vertimec Atilla 3,5 kg/ha Atilla 7,0 kg/ha

Insecticidal effect GEP trial - Italy 2009 (Ravenna - Anadiag Italia) Pear cv. Passa Crassana Objects Product Rate Application Untreated - - Vertimec 0,75 L/ha 04/07 Atilla 6,0 kg/ha 28/06-04/07-11/07 Assessment Number of larvae (L1-L5) on shoots Dessicated leaf area caused by Cacopsylla pyri

Insecticidal effect GEP trial - Italy 2009 (Ravenna - Anadiag Italia) Product Efficacy on larvae (%) 7 DA-B Efficacy on larvae (%) 13 DA-C Untreated - - Vertimec 83 a 98 a Atilla 33 b 74 b Product Untreated Vertimec Atilla Dessicated leaf area (0-10) 13 DA-C 2,8 a 0,3 b 0,3 b

Insecticidal effect GEP trial - Belgium 2010 (Pcfruit) Pear cv. Conference Objects Product Rate Application Untreated - - Calypso 0,375 L/ha 01/10 Atilla 5,0 kg/ha 01/10-08/10-15/10 Assessment Number of young larvae (L1-L3) on shoots Number of old larvae (L4-L5) on shoots

Insecticidal effect GEP trial - Belgium 2010 (Pcfruit) 140 Number L1-L3/10 shoots 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 01/10 08/10 15/10 22/10 Untreated Calypso Atilla

Insecticidal effect GEP trial - Belgium 2010 (Pcfruit) 250 Number L4-L5/10 shoots 200 150 100 50 0 01/10 08/10 15/10 22/10 Untreated Calypso Atilla

Triple action Reduces egg deposit Insecticidal on larvae Reduces black pears

Less black sooty mold GEP trial - Spain 2012 (Anadiag Ibérica) Pear cv. Conference Objects Product Rate Application Untreated - - Vertimec 0,75 L/ha 11/07 Atilla 3,5 kg/ha 11/07-18/07-25/07-01/08 Atilla 7,0 kg/ha 11/07-18/07-25/07-01/08 Assessments Honeydew severity and incidence on fruits Black sooty mold severity and incidence on fruits

Less black sooty mold GEP trial - Spain 2012 (Anadiag Ibérica) Product Efficacy on honeydew severity (%) - 8 DA-D Efficacy on honeydew incidence (%) - 15 DA-D Untreated - - Vertimec 30 a 29 a Atilla 3,5 kg/ha 48 a 46 a Atilla 7,0 kg/ha 64 a 56 a Product Efficacy on black sooty mold severity (%) - 8 DA-D Efficacy on black sooty mold incidence (%) - 15 DA-D Untreated - - Vertimec 59 a 37 a Atilla 3,5 kg/ha 68 a 44 a Atilla 7,0 kg/ha 70 a 52 a

Less black sooty mold GEP trial - Spain 2009 (Anadiag Ibérica) Pear cv. Conference Objects Product Rate Application Untreated - - Vertimec 0,75 L/ha 07/07 Atilla 5,0 kg/ha 30/06-07/07-14/07 Assessment Black sooty mold severity and incidence on fruits

Less black sooty mold GEP trial - Spain 2009 (Anadiag Ibérica) 90 Efficacy (%) 80 70 60 50 40 30 80 a 67 a 20 44 b 10 0 Black sooty mold severity 25 b Black sooty mold incidence Vertimec Atilla

When to start? After growth has stopped Before adults start deposing their eggs In mixed populations, before too much honeydew has been formed

Ideal timing in case of mixed population

Too late to solve with Atilla alone

How to apply? Dose : 5 kg/ha (= 3,3 kg/ha LWA) Block treatment : 3 to 4 times per generation Good spraying technique contact Amount of water depends on training system No surfactant needed Good coverage of the entire tree Maximum : 7 kg/ha and 9 applications/year

Dose Italy 2009 - Pear cv. Passa Crassana Atilla applied on 28/06-04/07-11/07 16 Number L1-L3/10 shoots 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 28/06 05/07 12/07 19/07 Untreated Atilla 3,0 kg/ha Atilla 4,0 kg/ha Atilla 6,0 kg/ha

Block treatment Belgium 2010 - Pear cv. Conference Atilla applied at 5,0 kg/ha on 02/09-08/09-17/09-24/09 60 % leaves with larvae 50 40 30 20 10 0 Untreated 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x

Spray volume Belgium 2010 - Pear cv. Conference Atilla applied at 5,0 kg/ha 60 % leaves with larvae 50 40 30 20 10 0 Untreated 300 L/ha 700 L/ha 1000 L/ha

When to apply? Highest insecticidal efficay under warm, dry conditions Desiccating on larvae After heavy rain or during drizzle, followed by sunshine Which interval? About 7 days, depending on psylla development Shorter under warm conditions High psylla pressure => shorter interval After the rain

Safe for beneficials Lab studies registration dossier - CRA-Laboratoire d Écotoxicologie (Gembloux, Belgium) Trigger value of hazard quotient (HQ = PER/LR 50 ) = 1 Atilla poses low risk to non target arthropods

Safe for beneficials Orius laevigatus Typhlodromis pyri Aphidius rhopalosiphi

Safe for beneficials Forficula auricularia Anthocoris nemoralis Trombidium sp.

Safe for beneficials Belgium 2012 - Pear cv. Conference Atilla applied 6-8 times at 5,0 kg/ha, starting at the end of June till harvest Beating samples: 10 x 10 beatings Trial 1 (sum of 09/07, 12/07, 24/07, 30/07, 06/08 en 07/09) Anthocoris Trombidium Spiders Untreated 11 4 15 Atilla 17 6 12 Trial 2 (sum of 18/07, 25/07, 01/08, 04/09) Anthocoris Trombidium Spiders Untreated 18 7 12 Atilla 31 4 20

Safe for beneficials Atilla aims at a reduction of the pear psylla-population of about 80% Atilla is completely safe for the natural enemies of pear psylla Along with the natural enemies Atilla keeps the pear psylla population under control

Safe for beneficials High psylla pressure and few beneficials? Atilla Unsufficient efficacy when there is lots of honeydew Traditional products Unsufficient efficacy when the population is heterogeneous Atilla as the ideal partner of traditional products

No MRL Kaolin, oil Traditional products + beneficials and/or Traditional products Source: pcfruit

Potassium fertilizer Atilla contains 40 % K 2 O 5,0 kg/ha Atilla = 2,0 kg/ha K 2 O ( 4,3 kg/ha KNO 3 ) Higher K-content in the fruits fruit quality No negative effect on Ca-content Belgium 2012 - Pear cv. Conference Atilla applied at 5,0 kg/ha, 6 x from the end of July till harvest Mineral analysis of fruits at harvest mg/100 g fresh weight % DM K Ca Mg Untreated 13,9 138,4 7,5 6,4 Atilla 13,7 153,6 7,8 6,9

Tank mixes Good mixability, except with products that strongly acidify the spraying solution Aliette Regalis Plus Foliar Ca-fertilizers Ca-EDTA and Ca-carbonate OK MAP, MKP

Strong features 1. Different pear psylla stages + black sooty mold 2. No negative effect on beneficials 3. No residue 4. Potassium fertilizer 5. Works differently from other products

Key points Use in summer and after harvest Start when Psylla pressure is low Block treatments (3-4/generation) Interval ± 1 week 5 kg/ha, max. 9 applications/year Good spraying technique

Integrated control of pear psylla & black pears