FINAL REPORT: CONNECTION STRENGTH TESTING TENSAR GEOGRIDS WITHIN MESA STANDARD BLOCKS AND MESA STANDARD CONNECTORS

Similar documents
How to Design a Singly Reinforced Concrete Beam

Interaction Testing Report. 24 SF Units with Synteen Geogrids. Stone Strong Systems Lincoln, Nebraska

10,000. Peak Connection Strength, lb/ft 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000

SECTION SPECIFICATION FOR STONEBRIDGE RETAINING WALL SYSTEM

2010 NTPEP Report Series

Trusted ICC ES. Conformity! Evaluation. ICC-ES Evaluation

ICC-ES Evaluation Report Issued July 1, 2011 This report is subject to renewal in one year.

ANCHOR BOLTS IN CLAY MASONRY WALLS

In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Performance of the MINI-MC Flange Connector

Stability of a Mechanically Stabilized Earth Wall

In-plane testing of precast concrete wall panels with grouted sleeve

DIVISION: EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS SECTION: RETAINING WALLS SECTION: SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALLS REPORT HOLDER:

CONCRETE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM

STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATION 863 REINFORCED SOIL SLOPES. October 19, 2012

MODULAR CONCRETE RETAINING WALL

PERFORMANCE OF LAP SPLICES IN CONCRETE MASONRY SHEAR WALLS UNDER IN-PLANE LOADING

Concrete Reinforcing Bar Samples 23 & 24

Construction of MSE Wall Using Tire Shred-sand Mixture as Backfill (SPR-3470)

GFRP HOLLOW-CORE REBARS FOR CONCRETE BEAMS

DETERMINATION OF THE LONG-TERM PROPERTIES FOR MIRAGRID XT GEOGRIDS

The Development of Strain Penetration in Lightly Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls

Technical Notes 39A - Testing for Engineered Brick Masonry - Determination of Allowable Design Stresses [July/Aug. 1981] (Reissued December 1987)

DETERMINATION OF THE LONG TERM PROPERTIES FOR MIRAFI PET-SERIES REINFORCEMENT GEOTEXTILES BY GRI-GT7 AND NCMA GUIDELINES

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 5/8/7)

BOND STRENGTH OF REINFORCING BARS WITH DEFORMATION SPACINGS THAT EXCEED MAXIMUM SPECIFIED IN ASTM A615

TION GUIDE ALLA T INS

Site Director: Dr. Sami Rizkalla Associate Director: Dr. Rudi Seracino Date: February 1 st, 2011

QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF GEOGRIDS USED FOR SUBGRADE TREATMENT

INSPECTION GUIDE FOR SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALLS TEK 18-11B

ASTM D % 8.02% NA 1223 NA for App. Usage NA for App. Usage. NA for App. Usage. NA for App. Usage. NA for App.

STRENGTHENING OF INFILL MASONRY WALLS USING BONDO GRIDS WITH POLYUREA

S T R U C T U R. Technology. magazine. Software for the Structural Design of Masonry. The Design Basis. Copyright

RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE June 1 4, 2016

BEHAVIOR OF INFILL MASONRY WALLS STRENGTHENED WITH FRP MATERIALS

Mr. Jody Wall Carolina Stalite P.O. Box 186 Phone: (704)

Evaluation of the Orientation of 90 and 180 Reinforcing Bar Hooks in Wide Members

Softening Coefficients for Prestressed Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete. Prestressed Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete in Tension.

UHPC Connection of Precast Bridge Deck

Environmental Engineering Concrete Structures - Introduction. William A. Wallace, P.E., SECB

Wall Modular Block Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Item S.

Mechanical Stabilization of Unbound Layers and Incorporation of Benefits in AASHTO 93 and M-E Analysis of Flexible Pavements

Figure 1: Test layouts at SCL and Tyrell Gilb laboratories.

Precision Geosynthetic Laboratories

Route 360 Inverted T-beams. Carin Roberts-Wollmann Virginia Tech Tommy Cousins Clemson University Fatmir Menkulasi Louisiana Tech

Geoguide 6 The New Guide to Reinforced Fill Structure and Slope Design in Hong Kong

SHAKE TABLE TESTING OF BRIDGE REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS UNDER COMBINED ACTIONS

Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests. Southwire Company

AN INNOVATIVE DUCTILE COMPOSITE FABRIC FOR STRENGTHENING CONCRETE STRUCTURES. Abstract

DIVISION: CONCRETE SECTION: REINFORCING STEEL REPORT HOLDER: SAS STRESSTEEL INC. 100 NEW DUTCH LANE FAIRFIELD, NEW JERSEY 07004

Originally Issued: 05/20/2013 Revised: 07/07/2017 Valid Through: 05/31/ Design

Seismic Retrofit Of RC Columns With Inadequate Lap-Splice Length By External Post-Tensioned High-Strength Strips

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR NSWS NATURAL STONE RETAINING AND FREE-STANDING WALL SYSTEMS

THE BRACE CONNECTION THE BOLTED OPTION FIGURE 1 MODEL SHOWING THE BOILER AND THE STRUCTURAL SUPPORT SYSTEM (BOILER BUILDING)

Resource Guide. Section 4: Ni-Resist

Structural Behavior of Tension Members in UHPC

ESR-2894 Reissued April 2014 This report is subject to renewal April 1, 2016.

DESIGN CALCULATIONS INSTA-FOOTING LOAD BEARING CAPACITIES ON CONCRETE SLAB. January 14, 2017 Rev -

OVERVIEW OF PROCEDURE 2B

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF CONCRETE TILT-UP BUILDINGS: CURRENT WALL-TO-SLAB CONNECTIONS

Predicting racking performance of walls sheathed on both sides

1. INTRODUCTION. (a) Sand/ Fabric-coated (b) Sand-coated deformed. (c) Helical wrapped/ribbed Fig.1 FRP anchors with different outer surfaces

AN ANALYSIS OF THE BEHAVIOR OF HYBRID STEEL BEAM RC COLUMN CONNECTION

GRI Standard Practice GG4(b) * "Determination of the Long-Term Design Strength of Flexible Geogrids"

CHAPTER 9 STAIR CASES 9.1 GENERAL FEATURES 9.2 TYPES OF STAIR CASES

ABSTRACT. KEY WORDS: Tubular piles; composite behavior; offshore structures; push-out strength; bond strength; slip.

Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Eccentric Beam-Column Connections with Floor Slabs

OVERVIEW OF PROCEDURE 2A

Current Standard Plates including Transmittal Letters are available on the web at:

Hawkins Hanger Tensile Testing: Summary of Testing Results

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE REPORT EFFECT OF CONCRETE REMOVAL EQUIPMENT AND METHODS ON THE CONDITION OF DECK CONCRETE LEFT IN PLACE

SPECIFICATION for ISCO HDPE DUAL CONTAINMENT PIPE

SECTION ALUMINUM WINDOWS

TensarTech TW3 Wall System Earth Retaining Structures

Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition

The entire document shall be read and understood before proceeding with a test. ISTA 3B Page 1 of 35

02632 Segmental Concrete Retaining Wall System Page - 1

Module 4 (Lecture 15) SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS: ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY AND SETTLEMENT

CENTER FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING STUDIES

June 1, 2017 PARTIES INTERESTED IN LOAD BEARING THERMAL BREAK ASSEMBLIES INSTALLED BETWEEN CONCRETE BALCONIES AND CONCRETE FLOORS

New ICC/ACI Design Concept for Post-Installed Reinforcement Bars Kelly Chua, B.Eng (Civil and Structural)

PERFORMANCE OF ANCHOR BOLTS IN CONCRETE MASONRY UNDER COMBINED TENSION AND SHEAR LOADING

Influence of Arching Mechanism in Masonry Walls Strengthened with FRP Laminates

LANDSCAPE RETAINING WALLS

DECORATIVE INTERIOR WALL PANEL FACING SYSTEM

Performance of NSM FRP strengthened concrete slabs at low temperatures

ENGINEERING MATERIALS Assignment #8: Concrete Mix Design

16. Design of Pipeline Structures.

SECTION PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING CONCRETE UNIT PAVEMENT

DESIGNING AND CONSTRUCTION OF T-WALL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM

Moment curvature analysis of concrete flexural members confined with CFRP grids

Pile to Slab Bridge Connections

GFRP retrofitted RC frames with columns subjected to high axial stresses

PERFORMANCE OF REINFORCEMENT LAP SPLICES IN CONCRETE MASONRY. CHRISTOPHE de VIAL

Manufacturing (Bending-Unbending-Stretching) Effects on AHSS Fracture Strain

Structural Vessel Repairs Using Automated Weld Overlays

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: HILTI, INC.

Design of Semi gravity Retaining Walls

ES230 Strength of Materials Exam 6 - Compilation Prof. Kurtz, ES230 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Exam 6 Wednesday, April 26, 2017, 7pm

Anchorage Failure and Shear Failure of RC Exterior Beam-Column Joint

DIVISION: CONCRETE SECTION: CONCRETE ACCESSORIES SECTION: REINFORCING STEEL REPORT HOLDER: PEIKKO GROUP, INC.

Transcription:

Prepared for: Tensar International Corporation, Limited LLC, Inc. 5883 Glenridge Drive, Suite 2 Atlanta, GA 3328 FINAL REPORT: CONNECTION STRENGTH TESTING TENSAR GEOGRIDS WITHIN MESA STANDARD BLOCKS AND MESA STANDARD CONNECTORS Prepared by: 445 International Blvd., Suite B117 Norcross, GA 393 Project Number: SG1345 April 16, 27

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................2 2 TEST MATERIALS.......................................................................2 3 TEST EQUIPMENT......................................................................2 4 TESTING METHOD AND PROCEDURES...................................................2 5 TEST RESULTS.........................................................................3 6 CLOSURE.............................................................................3 Table 1: Summary of Connection Strength Test Results......................................5 APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF TEST PROCEDURES............................................6 Test Procedures........................................................................7 Figure A1: SGI s Connection Test Device...................................................8 Figure A2: Tensar UX14MSE Geogrid placed on top of Mesa Standard Block.................8 Figure A3: Schematic Diagram of Test Cross-Section.........................................9 APPENDIX B: SUMMARY OF CONNECTION TEST RESULTS...................................1 Test Series 1: Tensar UX11MSE Geogrid Test............................................11 Test Series 2: Tensar UX14MSE Geogrid Test............................................12 Test Series 3: Tensar UX15MSE Geogrid Test............................................13 Test Series 4: Tensar UX16MSE Geogrid Test............................................14 Test Series 5: Tensar UX17MSE Geogrid Test............................................15 Test Series 6: Tensar LH8 Geogrid Test.................................................16 1

1. INTRODUCTION SGI Testing Services, LLC (SGI) conducted a laboratory testing program to evaluate the connection strength between Tensar geogrids and Mesa standard block units. The testing program was conducted in accordance with the test procedures and conditions specified by Mr. Andy Anderson, P.E. of Tensar International Corporation (Tensar). All of the connection strength tests were conducted at SGI located in Norcross, Georgia. 2. TEST MATERIALS Three types of materials were used in this testing program. Descriptions of these materials are given below: Geosynthetic Reinforcement: Six (6) Tensar Geogrids (i.e., UX11MSE, UX14MSE, UX15MSE, UX16MSE, UX17MSE, and LH8) manufactured by Tensar. Segmental Retaining Wall (SRW) Facing Units: Mesa Standard Concrete Units. A full-size Mesa Standard Concrete Unit used during this testing program had dimensions of approximately 18 in. wide by 11 in. long by 8 in. high, and weighed 78 lbs. Connectors: Mesa Standard Connectors. All of the test materials used in the testing program were provided by Tensar International Corporation. 3. TEST EQUIPMENT The connection strength tests were conducted in SGI's connection testing device that had plan dimensions of 3 ft by 7 ft and an overall depth of 2 in. The connection testing device had a normal loading system consisting of three hydraulic cylinders and a horizontal loading system consisting of two hydraulic cylinders. A photo of the connection testing device is shown in Figure A-1. 4. TEST METHOD AND PROCEDURES The connection strength tests were performed in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Test Method D 6638, "Determining Connection Strength between Geosynthetic Reinforcement and Segmental Concrete Units". The specific testing procedures used to conduct connection testing are described in Appendix A. 2

5. TEST RESULTS Six series of connection strength tests were performed to evaluate the connection strength between the six Tensar Geogrids and Mesa Standard Concrete Units in this testing program. For each connection strength test series, the test results are presented on a summary page in Appendix B. The summary page includes: Connection force versus displacement figure; Connection strength versus normal load figure; and A table that summarizes test conditions, peak, and.75 in. connection strength. The results of the six connection test series are also summarized in Table 1. 6. CLOSURE The reported test results apply only to the materials and test conditions used in the laboratory testing program. The test results do not necessarily apply to other materials or test conditions. The test results should not be used in engineering analysis unless the test conditions model the anticipated field conditions. The testing was performed in accordance with general engineering testing standards and requirements. This testing report is submitted for the exclusive use of Tensar International Corporation. 3

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 4

Table 1: Summary of Connection Strength Test Results Tensar International Corporation Mesa Geogrids/Mesa Standard Block with Mesa Standard Connectors Test Series No. Test Conditions 1 Tensar UX11MSE (Lot#18944-67, T LOT =4564 lb/ft) connected to one Mesa Standard Unit with two Mesa Standard Connectors Geogrid Width (inches) Number of Ribs Normal Stress (psi) Normal Load (lb/ft) Total Connection Load Connection Strength At 3/4" (lbs) Peak (lbs) At 3/4" (lb/ft) Peak (lb/ft) 18.4 21 2. 264 1911 1911 1247 1247 18.4 21 5. 66 1931 1931 1259 1259 Ave. Peak (lb.ft) 1253 2 Tensar UX14MSE (Lot#19118-3, T LOT =529 lb/ft) connected to one Mesa Standard Unity with two Mesa Standard Connectors 17.8 21 43. 528 1915 1945 1291 1311 17.8 21 8. 156 253 253 1384 1384 1348 3 Tensar UX15MSE (Lot#18973-1, T LOT =8452 lb/ft) connected to one Mesa Standard Unit with two Mesa Standard Connectors 17.9 21 6. 792 3395 3395 2276 2276 17.9 21 1. 132 3514 3514 2355 2355 2316 4 Tensar UX16MSE (Lot#18434-24, T LOT =1,7 lb/ft) connected to one Mesa Standard Unit with two Mesa Standard Connectors 17.9 21 6. 792 4357 4357 2921 2921 17.9 21 12. 1584 45 45 317 317 2969 5 Tensar UX17MSE (Lot#1914-34, T LOT =12,65 lb/ft) connected to one Mesa Standard Unit with two Mesa Standard Connectors 17.9 21 8. 156 5169 5169 3465 3465 17.9 21 16. 2112 519 519 3479 3479 3472 34.5 32.5 59 2647 328 921 153 6 Tensar LH8 (Lot#211318) connected to two Mesa Standard Units with four Mesa Standard Connectors 34.5 32 2.7 36 2723 2878 947 11 34.5 32 4.5 6 287 3117 998 184 n/a 34.5 32 6.8 9 2819 387 98 174 NOTES: N/A Date Reported: 4/16/27 Figure No. Project No.: SGI:57 Document No.: SGI73 File No. 5

APPENDIX A: Summary of Test Procedures 6

TEST PROCEDURES For each connection test, the test specimen was set up in accordance with the following procedures and tested under the specific conditions as described below: A lower course of concrete block units (a full block unit at the center and a half block unit on each side) was placed in the lower half of the pullout box. The concrete block units were oriented so that the back of the concrete block units were against the front wall of the pullout box; A geogrid specimen was trimmed from the bulk sample and placed on the top of the lower block units. Two Mesa standard connectors were fitted through specific apertures of the geogrid specimen into the pre-cast slot on top of a lower block unit. The front end of the geogrid was connected to the loading harness of the connection testing device; The upper course of concrete block units (two full blocks) was placed directly on top of the geogrid. The concrete block units were oriented so that the back of the concrete block units were against the front wall of the pullout box; A specific normal stress was applied to the top of the upper concrete block units using a loading system consisting of three hydraulic cylinders; After application of the normal stress, the geogrid specimen was pulled at a constant tensile strain rate, which was calculated based on the exposed length of the geogrid specimen. Pulling out of the geogrid specimen was continued until a constant or decreasing pullout load was recorded; and Uniaxial geogrids were tested in the machine direction and LH8 was tested in the crossmachine direction. The setup of the connection strength test is shown Figure A-2 (test photo) and Figure A-3 (schematic diagram). 7

Figure A1: SGI s Connection Test Device Figure A2: Tensar International Corporation s UX14MSE geogrid placed on top of Mesa Standard Block with 2 Standard Connectors. 8

Normal Load Loading Plate Cushion Layer Block Facing Mesa Standard Connector Geogrid Connection Load Figure A3: Schematic Diagram of Test Cross-Section (Not to scale.) 9

APPENDIX B: Summary of Connection Results 1

Determining Connection Strength Between Geosynthetic Reinforcement and Segmental Concrete Units (ASTM D 6638) TEST SERIES NO. 1: Tensar UX11MSE Geogrid (Lot #18944-67, Lot ultimate strength = 4564 lb/ft) in machine direction within Mesa Standard Block Units with 2 Mesa Standard Connectors per block 2 2 1A 16 1B 12 8 4.75-in. 16 Peak 12 8 4..2.4.6.8 1. 1.2 Displacement (in.) 4 8 12 16 2 Applied Normal Load ( N ) (lb/ft) Test Test Test Equivalent.75-in. Peak.75-in. Peak No. Specimen Normal Normal Load Load Strength Strength Width Stress Load (in.) (psi) (lb/ft) (lbs) (lbs) (lb/ft) (lb/ft) 1A 18.4 2. 264 1911 1911 1247 1247 1B 18.4 5. 66 1931 1931 1259 1259 NOTES: Failure Mode of Geogrid: CMD bars sheared beyond outer 4 teeth of MESA standard connector and center portion of the geogrid between connectors pulled out in each test. Failure Mode of Connector: none Failure of Block : none Geogrid Specimen Dimensions: 1 apertures long by 21 ribs wide and equivalent width = 21 ribs/13.7 rib/ft*12 = 18.4 in. Average Strain Rate for Tests 1A and 1B: 7.9 and 7.3 (%/min). DATE TESTED: 1 to 3 April 25 FIGURE NO. C-1 PROJECT NO. SGI57 DOCUMENT NO. SGI73 FILE NO. Connection Force (lbs/ft) Connection Strength (T conn) (lbs/ft) Connection Strength Equations (T conn) 11

Determining Connection Strength Between Geosynthetic Reinforcement and Segmental Concrete Units (ASTM D 6638) TEST SERIES NO. 2: Tensar UX14MSE Geogrid (Lot #19118-3, Lot ultimate strength = 529 lb/ft) in machine direction within Mesa Standard Block Units with 2 Mesa Standard Connectors per block 2 2 2A 16 2B 12 8 4.75-in. 16 Peak 12 8 4..2.4.6.8 1. 1.2 Displacement (in.) 4 8 12 16 2 Applied Normal Load ( N ) (lb/ft) Test Test Test Equivalent.75-in. Peak.75-in. Peak No. Specimen Normal Normal Load Load Strength Strength Width Stress Load (in.) (psi) (lb/ft) (lbs) (lbs) (lb/ft) (lb/ft) 2A 17.8 4. 528 1915 1945 1291 1311 2B 17.8 8. 156 253 253 1384 1384 NOTES: Failure Mode of Geogrid: CMD bars sheared beyond outer 4 teeth of MESA standard connector and center portion of the geogrid between connectors pulled out in each test. Failure Mode of Connector: none Failure of Block : none Geogrid Specimen Dimensions: 1 apertures long by 21 ribs wide and equivalent width = 21 ribs/14.18 rib/ft*12 = 17.8 in. Average Strain Rate for Tests 2A and 2B: 8. and 9.4 (%/min). DATE TESTED: 1 to 3 April 25 FIGURE NO. C-2 PROJECT NO. SGI57 DOCUMENT NO. SGI73 FILE NO. Connection Force (lbs/ft) Connection Strength (T conn) (lbs/ft) Connection Strength Equations (T conn) 12

Determining Connection Strength Between Geosynthetic Reinforcement and Segmental Concrete Units (ASTM D 6638) TEST SERIES NO. 3: Tensar UX15MSE Geogrid (Lot #18973, Lot ultimate strength = 8452 lb/ft) in machine direction within Mesa Standard Block Units with 2 Mesa Standard Connectors per block 35 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 3A 3B 3 25 2 15 1 5.75-in. Peak..2.4.6.8 1. 1.2 Displacement (in.) 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 Applied Normal Load ( N ) (lb/ft) Test Test Test Equivalent.75-in. Peak.75-in. Peak No. Specimen Normal Normal Load Load Strength Strength Width Stress Load (in.) (psi) (lb/ft) (lbs) (lbs) (lb/ft) (lb/ft) 3A 17.9 6. 792 3395 3395 2276 2276 3B 17.9 1. 132 3514 3514 2355 2355 NOTES: Failure Mode of Geogrid: CMD bars sheared beyond outer 4 teeth of MESA standard connector and center portion of the geogrid between connectors pulled out in each test. Failure Mode of Connector: none Failure of Block : none Geogrid Specimen Dimensions: 1 apertures long by 21 ribs wide and equivalent width = 21 ribs/14.1 rib/ft*12 = 17.9 in. Average Strain Rate for Tests 3A and 3B: 7.7 and 8.3 (%/min). DATE TESTED: 1 to 3 April 25 FIGURE NO. C-3 PROJECT NO. SGI57 DOCUMENT NO. SGI73 FILE NO. Connection Force (lbs/ft) Connection Strength (T conn) (lbs/ft) Connection Strength Equations (T conn) 13

Determining Connection Strength Between Geosynthetic Reinforcement and Segmental Concrete Units (ASTM D 6638) TEST SERIES NO. 4: Tensar UX16MSE Geogrid (Lot #18434-24, Lot ultimate strength = 17 lb/ft) in machine direction within Mesa standard block units with 2 MESA standard connectors per block 4 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 4A 4B 3 2 1.75-in. Peak..2.4.6.8 1. 1.2 Displacement (in.) 1 2 3 4 Applied Normal Load ( N ) (lb/ft) Test Test Test Equivalent.75-in. Peak.75-in. Peak No. Specimen Normal Normal Load Load Strength Strength Width Stress Load (in.) (psi) (lb/ft) (lbs) (lbs) (lb/ft) (lb/ft) 4A 17.9 6. 792 4357 4357 2921 2921 4B 17.9 12. 1584 45 45 317 317 NOTES: Failure Mode of Geogrid: CMD bars sheared beyond outer 4 teeth of MESA standard connector and center portion of the geogrid between connectors pulled out in each test. Failure Mode of Connector: none Failure of Block: none Geogrid Specimen Dimensions: 1 apertures long by 21 ribs wide and equivalent width = 21 ribs/14.5 rib/ft*12 = 17.9 in. Average Strain Rate for Tests 4A and 4B: 8.8 and 9.9 (%/min). DATE TESTED: 1 to 3 April 25 FIGURE NO. C-4 PROJECT NO. SGI57 DOCUMENT NO. SGI73 FILE NO. Connection Force (lbs/ft) Connection Strength (T conn) (lbs/ft) Connection Strength Equations (T conn) 14

Determining Connection Strength Between Geosynthetic Reinforcement and Segmental Concrete Units (ASTM D 6638) TEST SERIES NO. 5: Tensar UX17MSE Geogrid (Lot #1914-34, Lot ultimate strength = 1265lb/ft) in machine direction within Mesa Standard Block Units with 2 Mesa Standard Connectors per block 4 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 5A 5B 3 2 1.75-in. Peak..2.4.6.8 1. 1.2 Displacement (in.) 1 2 3 4 Applied Normal Load ( N ) (lb/ft) Test Test Test Equivalent.75-in. Peak.75-in. Peak No. Specimen Normal Normal Load Load Strength Strength Width Stress Load (in.) (psi) (lb/ft) (lbs) (lbs) (lb/ft) (lb/ft) 5A 17.9 8. 156 5169 5169 3465 3465 5B 17.9 16. 2112 519 519 3479 3479 NOTES: Failure Mode of Geogrid: CMD bars partially sheared beyond outer 4 teeth of MESA standard connector in each test. Failure Mode of Connector: rupture of teeth and flags. Failure of Block : portion of concrete in the back (taill side) of one connector sheared off in each test Geogrid Specimen Dimensions: 1 apertures long by 21 ribs wide and equivalent width = 21 ribs/14.1 rib/ft*12 = 17.9 in. Average Strain Rate for Tests 5A and 5B: 8.8 and 1. (%/min). DATE TESTED: 1 to 3 April 25 FIGURE NO. C-5 PROJECT NO. SGI57 DOCUMENT NO. SGI73 FILE NO. Connection Force (lbs/ft) Connection Strength (T conn) (lbs/ft) Connection Strength Equations (T conn) 15

Determining Connection Strength Between Geosynthetic Reinforcement and Segmental Concrete Units (ASTM D 6638) TEST SERIES NO. 6: Tensar LH8 Geogrid in cross-machine direction (Lot # 211318) between two courses of round-face Mesa Standard Blocks with 2 unsplit Mesa Standard Connectors per block 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 9A 9B 9C 9D 2 16 12 8 4.75-in. Peak Connection Force (lbs/ft) Connection Strength (T conn) (lbs/ft)..3.6.9 1.2 1.5 Displacement (in.) 2 4 6 8 1 12 Applied Normal Load ( N ) (lb/ft) Test Geogrid Test Equivalent.75-in. Peak.75-in. Peak No. Specimen Normal Normal Load Load Strength Strength Nominal Width Stress Load (in.) (psi) (lb/ft) (lbs) (lbs) (lb/ft) (lb/ft) 9A 34.5.5 59 2647 328 921 153 Connection Strength Equations 9B 34.5 2.7 36 2723 2878 947 11 T.75-in. = 92 + (N) tan ( 5 o ) 9C 34.5 4.5 6 287 3117 998 184 9D 34.5 6.8 9 2819 387 98 174 T peak = 13 + (N) tan ( 3 o ) (T conn) NOTES: Dimensions of Block: 18 in. wide by 11. in. long and 8. in. high. Dimensions of Geogrid Specimen within Connection: 34.5" (32 rib) wide by 6" long. Weight of a Full-Size Block: 78 lbs. Failure Mode of Geogrid: outer teeth of Mesa standard connectors sheared thru CMD bars in each test. DATE TESTED: 3 August 26 FIGURE NO. C-9 PROJECT NO. SGI65 DOCUMENT NO. SGI73 FILE NO. 16