Evaluation of the "Fit" of Amber and Rave in Tall Fescue Pastures

Similar documents
(TA-05-03) Site Description Page 1 North Carolina State University. Osprey tank mix study -- broadleaf control. Phone No:

Southern Illinois University. General Trial Information. Trial Location. Personnel

Conducted Under GEP (Y/N): Y Guideline Description: To Protocol

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center Rattail fescue control in chemical fallow

EVALUATION OF HERBICIDES IN CARAWAY IN HARVEST YEAR, Loimaa

Soil Moisture: Moist Emergence Date: 13/May/2003. Pest Description Pest 1 Type: W Code: ABUTH Abutilon theophrasti Common Name: Velvetleaf

Comparison of "Full Load" Glyphosate Formulations in Roundup Ready Soybean - Waterhemp.

EFFICACY EVALUATION OF FUNGICIDE PROSARO AGAINST SCLEROTINIA DISEASE IN TURNIP RAPE

Kansas State University Field Pansy Control In No-Till Fields Going To Soybeans

EVALUATION OF ATTRIBUT SUPER AT LOWER DOSES IN WHEAT IN 2011

THE SELECTIVITY OF THE TANK MIXTURE OF ATTRIBUT SUPER AND THE PLANT GROWTH REGULATOR IN SPRING WHEAT

MTT Agrifood Research Finland Trial Report 2012 Herbicides, fungicides and insecticides

MTT Agrifood Research Finland Trial Report 2011 Herbicides, fungicides and insecticides

Evaluation of Pendimethalin CS and EC.

Foliar applied insecticide control of the Soybean Aphid (2015)

RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA

First year harvest. AGRONOVA - Gefion Field Trials

LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy. Valor and Velpar K4 Application Timing and Cane Tolerance Test

Foliar applied insecticide control of the Soybean Aphid (2011) Summary Background

Planting Date vs. Rice Water Weevil Beaumont, TX 2006

Use of Residual Herbicides for Tough to Control Weeds in Snap Beans Final Report for 2012

Intentionally Left Blank

WEED CONTROL IN TOMATOES RESEARCH RESULTS 2011 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, UNIV. GUELPH, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO TOMATO RESEARCH INSTITUTE

Foliar applied insecticides, application rates, and application timings for the control of the Soybean Aphid insecticide (2016)

Foliar Fungicide Study Block 5S Beaumont, TX 2009

Incorporating Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus Into an IPM Program for Corn Earworm in Sweet Corn

YIELD OF IRRIGATED COOL-SEASON GRASSES IN SOUTHWESTERN KANSAS

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

Table of Contents. Influence of Impact programs on weed control and yield of field corn in southern US. - AMVAC... 1

FIELD DATA BOOK REVISIONS FOR TRIAL YEAR

Evaluating Corn Row Spacing and Plant Population in thetexas Panhandle

Bruce Potter, Jeff Irlbeck and Jodie Getting, University of Minnesota Department of Entomology and Southwest Research and Outreach Center

IR-4 MINOR USE PERFORMANCE FORM PR NO. Date of Report Field I.D. No. Page 1

2014 Giant Ragweed Control with Diflexx Herbicide in Field Corn in Rochester, MN.

2012 Organic Soybean Variety Trial

WEED CONTROL IN PUMPKINS & SQUASH RESEARCH RESULTS 2006 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO PROCESSING VEGETABLE GROWERS

Chemical and Cultural Controls for Moss, Bryum argenteum on Putting Greens

Research Update for Apple Weed management. Deborah Breth Elizabeth Tee CCE- Lake Ontario Fruit Program

Introduction. Materials and Methods

EFFECT OF FUSILADE 2000 ON STORAGE AND SEED PERFORMANCE OF RUSSET BURBANK AND NORGOLD POTATOES. Steven R. James '

OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY

Field evaluation of wetting agent efficacy against localized dry spot and hydrophobicity in creeping bentgrass putting green turf -AquaAid

Response of newly released cotton varieties to plant spacing and density, under rain-fed conditions, at Damazin. Osama M. A.

R. Allen Straw, SW VA AREC, VPI Farm Rd., Glade Spring, VA 24340,

TIMELY INFORMATION Agriculture & Natural Resources

Extension Cotton Research & Demonstrations in Oklahoma 2001 Annual Report

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Mogeton 25 WP (Quinoclamine) on Fountain Grass (Pennisetum setaceum Cupreum )

Extending the Duration of Annual, Biennial, and Perennial Weed Control with Esplanade Tank Mixes

EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES ON NON-TRANSGENIC AND TRANSGENIC B.t. COTTON CULTIVARS FOR IMPACT ON TOBACCO BUDWORM, APHIDS AND SPIDER MITES

THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

A NOVEL SCREENING METHOD OF WATER STRESS IN MULTIPLE COTTON VARIETIES

BUR CUCUMBER CONTROL IN CORN WITH POSTEMERGENCE HERBICIDES

2013 Purdue Soybean On-Farm Trial ROW WIDTHS

Effects of Different Fertilizers and Continuous No-Till Production on Diseases, Growth, and Yield of Staked Tomato

Interaction between fungicide program and in-crop nitrogen timing for the control of yellow leaf spot (YLS) in mid-may sown wheat

Seedling Establishment of Three Primary Cool-Season Turfgrass Species as Affected by Four Urea-based Nitrogen Fertilizer Products.

2016 Oat Variety Trial

WEED CONTROL AND CROP RESPONSE WITH OPTION HERBICIDE APPLIED IN FIELD CORN

Peace Region Grass Seed Testing Program. Peace Region Forage Seed Association Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

WEED CONTROL IN ONION WITH POSTEMERGENCE HERBICIDES

Rescue N Applications for Corn: Yield Response, Leaf Burn, and Yield Loss Progress Report for 2003

Weed Control in Florida Citrus 1

Pumpkin Fungicide and Cultivar Evaluation, 2017

Sunflower Seeding Rate x Nitrogen Rate Trial Report

Institute of Ag Professionals

THE 2014 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Maximizing Soybean Yields

Gulf Coast Corn Hybrid Performance Trials. Dr. Dan D. Fromme Assistant Professor & Extension Agronomist

2014 High Tunnel Tomato Variety Trials

Objective: How it Was Done:

Evaluation of Experimental Nematicides for the Management of the Reniform Nematode in North Alabama, 2013

GIBBERELLIC ACID USE IN STALE SEED BED RICE PRODUCTION

Cattle Temporal & Spatial Distribution in Midwestern Pastures Using Global Positioning (A Three-Year Progress Report)

DEVELOPMENT OF HERBICIDE OPTIONS FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATOES

Vernon Center Technical Report # prepared by. Brian Olson John Sij Todd Baughman

International Journal of Applied Science and Technology Vol. 2 No. 10; December 2012

Alternative Systems for Cultivating and Side Dressing Specialty Crops for Improved Nitrogen Use Efficiency

HERBICIDE OPTIONS FOR WEED CONTROL

Cultural and chemical weed management in native fine fescue roughs

Seed-placed versus side-banded phosphorus fertilizer effects on faba bean establishment and yield. Project # ADOPT 2016

for Pepper Joe Masabni UKREC Princeton, KY Joe Masabni

Optimum water requirement of some boro rice mutant lines

Chart 1. Watermelon Fertility Programs

Bourgault Agronomy Trials March 13, 2017 Bourgault Industries Ltd Curtis de Gooijer PAg, CCA

2012 Organic Spring Wheat Weed Control Strategies Report

2007 PMR REPORT #ECORSMI2 SECTION E: CEREAL, FORAGE CROPS, and OILSEEDS - Insects

Nitrogen Availability from Potato-Processing Wastewater for Growing Corn

UPLAND COTTON LINT YIELD RESPONSE TO SEVERAL SOIL MOISTURE DEPLETION LEVELS

2013 Organic Spring Wheat Planting Date Trial

Cover Crops for Montana KENT A MCVAY

Further Evaluations of High Pressure Water Injection as a Turf Management Tool

Sugarbeet Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates K.A. Rykbost and R.L. Dovell

ROCKY MOUNTAIN CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER. Local Performance Objectives For Exams and Continuing Education Programs

Specialty Spring Barley Variety and Nitrogen Rate Trials across Northeastern Oregon Don Wysocki, Darrin L. Walenta, Mike Flowers, Nick D.

Minimizing Pesticide Spray Drift

Evaluation of Fertilizer Additives for Enhanced Nitrogen Efficiency in Corn. Final Project Report (2013 and 2014)

Evaluating Sugarcane Varieties in Southeast Texas. Beaumont, TX. 2003

2012 Minnesota Canola Production Center (CPC)

(01-ASC-10) Common ragweed leaf no. - numerous height (inch) - 2-4

Transcription:

(BPS07506) Site Description Page 1 of 7 Evaluation of the "Fit" of mber and Rave in Tall Fescue Pastures Trial ID: BPS07506 Location: Bradford REC Protocol ID: synpasture Study Director: Jim Wait and Jianmei Li Investigator: Kevin W. Bradley General Trial Information Study Director: Jim Wait and Jianmei Li Title: ffiliation: Postal Code: _ E-mail: Investigator: Kevin W. Bradley Title: ffiliation: Postal Code: _ E-mail: Keywords: Trial Location City: _ Trial Status: State/Prov.: Trial Reliability: Postal Code: _ Initiation Date: Country: _ Planned Completion Date: -Latitude of LL Corner : -Longitude of LL Corner : ltitude of LL Corner: Unit: ngle y-axis to North : Map Reference: Directions: Conducted Under GLP: _ Conducted Under GEP: _ Official Trial Code: Other Trial Code: Guideline Description 1. Objectives: Conclusions: Cooperator/Landowner Cooperator: Country: _ Organization: Phone No: ddress 1: Fax No: ddress 2: City: _ State/Prov: Postal Code: _ E-mail: Crop Description Crop 1: FESR Festuca arundinacea Tall fescue Variety: Description: Pasture BBCH Scale: BGRM Planting Date: Planting Method: Rate, Unit: Depth, Unit: Perennial ge, Unit: Row Spacing, Unit: Spacing Within Row, Unit: Seed Bed: Soil Temperature, Unit: Soil Moisture: Emergence Date: Harvest Date: Harvest Equipment: Harvested Width, Unit: Harvested Length, Unit: % Standard Moisture: Moisture Meter: Weighing Equipment: Pest Description Pest 1 Type: W Code: VENL Vernonia altissima Common Name: Tall Ironweed Description: Pest 2 Type: W Code: LESSS Lespedeza sp. Common Name: Lespedeza sp. Description: Common Lespedeza

(BPS07506) Site Description Page 2 of 7 Pest 3 Type: W Code: RUDTR Rudbeckia triloba Common Name: Brown-eyed-susan Description: Pest 4 Type: W Code: SOLC Solanum carolinense Common Name: Horsenettle Description: Pest 5 Type: W Code: ERIN Erigeron annuus Common Name: nnual fleabane Description: Site and Design Plot Width, Unit: 6.7 FT Site Type: Plot Length, Unit: 45 FT Tillage Type: Replications: 4 Study Design: Randomized Complete Block % Slope: Soil Drainage: _ Trial Initiation Comments: Previous Crops Previous Pesticides Year 1. Maintenance Maintenance Form Form Form Rate Ta No. Date Treatment Name Conc Unit Type Rate Unit Mi 1. _ Comment: Field Prep./Maintenance: Soil Description Description Name: % Sand: % OM: Texture: % Silt: ph: Soil Name: % Clay: CEC: Fert. Level: nalyzed By: dditional Measured Elements Element Quantity Unit Moisture Conditions Overall Moisture Conditions: Closest Weather Station: Distance: Unit: Date Time mount Unit Type Interval Unit 1. pplication Description pplication Date: 3/May/2006 Time of Day: 1:30 PM pplication Method: SPRY pplication Timing: POST pplication Placement: FOLIGE pplied By: JIM ir Temperature, Unit: 67 F % Relative Humidity: 78 Wind Velocity, Unit: 1 MPH Wind Direction: SW Dew Presence (Y/N): N Water Hardness: Soil Temperature, Unit: 62 F Soil Moisture: WET % Cloud Cover: 80 Next Rain Occurred On:

(BPS07506) Site Description Page 3 of 7 Crop Stage t Each pplication Crop 1 Code, BBCH Scale: FESR BGRM Stage Scale Used: BBCH Stage Majority, Percent: BOOT 90 Stage Minimum, Percent: Stage Maximum, Percent: Height, Unit: 8 IN Height Minimum, Maximum: Pest Stage t Each pplication Pest 1 Code, Disc., Scale: VENL W Stage Majority, Percent: 7 NODE 90 Stage Minimum, Percent: _ Stage Maximum, Percent: _ Height, Unit: 6 IN Height Minimum, Maximum: Density, Unit: 9 M2 _ Pest 2 Code, Disc., Scale: LESSS W Stage Majority, Percent: VEGET 90 Stage Minimum, Percent: _ Stage Maximum, Percent: _ Height, Unit: 4 IN Height Minimum, Maximum: Density, Unit: 11 M2 _ Pest 3 Code, Disc., Scale: RUDTR W Stage Majority, Percent: ROSETT 80 Stage Minimum, Percent: _ Stage Maximum, Percent: _ Height, Unit: 5 IN Height Minimum, Maximum: Density, Unit: 10 M2 _ Pest 4 Code, Disc., Scale: SOLC W Stage Majority, Percent: UNEMRG 100 Stage Minimum, Percent: _ Stage Maximum, Percent: _ Height, Unit: Height Minimum, Maximum: Density, Unit: Pest 5 Code, Disc., Scale: ERIN W Stage Majority, Percent: 6 NODE 90 Stage Minimum, Percent: _ Stage Maximum, Percent: _ Height, Unit: 3 IN Height Minimum, Maximum: Density, Unit: 30 M2 _

(BPS07506) Site Description Page 4 of 7 pplication Equipment ppl. Equipment: BCKPCK Operating Pressure, Unit: 28 PSI Nozzle Type: FLT FN Nozzle Size: 8002 XR Nozzle Spacing, Unit: 15 INCH Nozzles/Row: Nozzle Calibration, Unit: Band Width, Unit: Boom ID: Boom Length, Unit: 6.7 FOOT Boom Height, Unit: 25 INCH Ground Speed, Unit: 3 MPH Incorporation Equip.: Hours to Incorp.: Incorp. Depth, Unit: Carrier: WTER Spray Volume, Unit: 15 GP Mix Size, Unit: 1.572 LITERS Spray ph: Propellant: CO/2 Tank Mix (Y/N): Y Equipment Comment: Trt No Treatment pplication Comment Date By Notes Date By Deviations Reasons:

(BPS07506) OV Means Table Page 5 of 7 Evaluation of the "Fit" of mber and Rave in Tall Fescue Pastures Trial ID: BPS07506 Location: Bradford REC Protocol ID: synpasture Study Director: Jim Wait and Jianmei Li Investigator: Kevin W. Bradley Pest Type W Weed W Weed W Weed Pest Code VENL VENL RUDTR Pest Name Tall Ironweed Tall Ironweed Brwn Eye Susan Crop Code FESR FESR FESR BBCH Scale BGRM BGRM BGRM Crop Name Tall fescue Tall fescue Tall fescue Part Rated PLNT C PLNT P PLNT C PLNT C PLNT P PLNT P Rating Date 19/May/2006 19/May/2006 5/Jun/2006 5/Jun/2006 5/Jun/2006 5/Jun/2006 Rating Data Type PHYSTU CONTROL PHYSTU SDHD SUPPR CONTROL CONTROL Rating Unit 0-100 0-100 0-100 0-100 0-100 0-100 Days fter First/Last pplic. 16 16 16 16 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 Trt-Eval Interval 16 D- 16 D- 16 D- 16 D- 58 D- 58 D- Trt Treatment Rate Other Other Growth No. Name Rate Unit Rate Rate Unit Stage 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 Untreated 0.0 e 0.0 e 0.0 d 0.0 e 0.0 e 0.0 b 2 mber 0.0131 LB / 0.28 OZ/ POST 10.0 a-d 33.8 d 22.0 a 70.5 ab 46.0 bcd 67.3 a 2 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 3 mber 0.0164 LB / 0.35 OZ/ POST 6.3 b-e 36.3 bcd 15.8 abc 57.3 bcd 53.5 a-d 60.0 a 3 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 4 mber 0.022 LB / 0.47 OZ/ POST 11.3 abc 40.0 a-d 22.8 a 72.3 ab 47.3 bcd 71.8 a 4 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 5 mber 0.0263 LB / 0.56 OZ/ POST 16.3 a 36.3 bcd 19.0 ab 72.8 ab 58.3 abc 76.8 a 5 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 6 mber 0.0164 LB / 0.35 OZ/ POST 2.5 de 41.3 a-d 9.8 c 46.3 d 60.3 abc 74.5 a 6 2,4-D mine 0.95 LB / 1 QT/ POST 6 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 7 mber 0.022 LB / 0.47 OZ/ POST 2.5 de 45.0 ab 14.8 abc 49.5 cd 71.0 a 78.5 a 7 2,4-D mine 0.95 LB / 1 QT/ POST 7 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 8 Rave 0.08 LB / 2 OZ/ POST 5.0 cde 35.0 cd 13.5 bc 50.8 cd 38.0 d 60.0 a 8 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 9 Rave 0.12 LB / 3 OZ/ POST 7.5 b-e 41.3 a-d 15.5 abc 61.5 bcd 47.0 bcd 76.3 a 9 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 10 Rave 0.16 LB / 4 OZ/ POST 10.0 a-d 41.3 a-d 12.5 bc 67.0 abc 53.3 a-d 66.3 a 10 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 11 Rave 0.2 LB / 5 OZ/ POST 11.3 abc 43.8 abc 15.3 abc 59.5 bcd 65.3 ab 76.0 a 11 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 12 Rave 0.12 LB / 3 OZ/ POST 1.3 e 46.3 a 8.3 c 45.5 d 53.5 a-d 76.3 a 12 2,4-D mine 0.95 LB / 1 QT/ POST 12 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 13 Rave 0.16 LB / 4 OZ/ POST 1.3 e 45.0 ab 10.0 c 43.5 d 69.5 a 74.3 a 13 2,4-D mine 0.95 LB / 1 QT/ POST 13 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 14 Cimarron 0.0113 LB / 0.3 OZ/ POST 13.8 ab 38.8 a-d 19.5 ab 81.0 a 42.5 cd 71.3 a 14 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST LSD (P=.05) 6.56 8.45 7.10 15.81 17.24 20.74 Standard Deviation 4.59 5.91 4.97 11.06 12.06 14.51 CV 65.12 15.81 35.06 19.93 23.95 21.87 Grand Mean 7.05 37.41 14.18 55.52 50.38 66.36 Bartlett's X2 9.119 6.34 25.769 26.178 10.828 5.325 P(Bartlett's X2) 0.611 0.898 0.012* 0.01* 0.544 0.946 Replicate F 1.319 7.672 4.708 1.685 1.558 7.614 Replicate Prob(F) 0.2820 0.0004 0.0067 0.1859 0.2149 0.0004 Treatment F 5.041 15.026 5.834 12.840 8.442 7.612 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Duncan's New MRT) Mean comparisons performed only when OV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.

(BPS07506) OV Means Table Page 6 of 7 Pest Type W Weed W Weed W Weed W Weed W Weed Pest Code VENL LESSS RUDTR SOLC ERIN Pest Name Tall Ironweed Lespedeza sp. Brwn Eye Susan Horsenettle nn Fleabane Crop Code FESR BBCH Scale BGRM Crop Name Tall fescue Part Rated PLNT C PLNT P PLNT P PLNT P PLNT P PLNT P Rating Date 30/Jun/2006 30/Jun/2006 30/Jun/2006 30/Jun/2006 30/Jun/2006 30/Jun/2006 Rating Data Type PHYGEN CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL Rating Unit 0-100 0-100 0-100 0-100 0-100 0-100 Days fter First/Last pplic. 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 Trt-Eval Interval 58 D- 58 D- 58 D- 58 D- 58 D- 58 D- Trt Treatment Rate Other Other Growth No. Name Rate Unit Rate Rate Unit Stage 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 Untreated 0.0 h 0.0 c 0.0 d 0.0 d 0.0 c 0.0 b 2 mber 0.0131 LB / 0.28 OZ/ POST 16.3 bcd 17.5 bc 2.5 cd 70.0 bc 10.0 bc 99.0 a 2 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 3 mber 0.0164 LB / 0.35 OZ/ POST 9.3 d-g 22.5 b 2.5 cd 70.0 bc 13.8 ab 99.0 a 3 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 4 mber 0.022 LB / 0.47 OZ/ POST 20.0 bc 18.8 b 12.5 cd 78.8 ab 12.5 ab 99.0 a 4 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 5 mber 0.0263 LB / 0.56 OZ/ POST 21.3 b 23.8 b 5.0 cd 82.0 a 10.0 bc 99.0 a 5 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 6 mber 0.0164 LB / 0.35 OZ/ POST 2.5 gh 40.0 a 2.5 cd 79.5 ab 22.5 a 99.0 a 6 2,4-D mine 0.95 LB / 1 QT/ POST 6 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 7 mber 0.022 LB / 0.47 OZ/ POST 8.0 efg 42.5 a 5.0 cd 81.3 a 15.0 ab 99.0 a 7 2,4-D mine 0.95 LB / 1 QT/ POST 7 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 8 Rave 0.08 LB / 2 OZ/ POST 11.8 def 16.3 bc 5.0 cd 64.5 c 12.5 ab 99.0 a 8 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 9 Rave 0.12 LB / 3 OZ/ POST 9.3 d-g 20.0 b 11.3 cd 70.0 bc 15.0 ab 99.0 a 9 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 10 Rave 0.16 LB / 4 OZ/ POST 15.0 b-e 15.0 bc 7.5 cd 70.0 bc 12.5 ab 99.0 a 10 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 11 Rave 0.2 LB / 5 OZ/ POST 13.8 c-f 20.0 b 15.0 c 78.5 ab 20.0 ab 99.0 a 11 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 12 Rave 0.12 LB / 3 OZ/ POST 7.0 fgh 45.0 a 33.8 b 88.8 a 18.8 ab 99.0 a 12 2,4-D mine 0.95 LB / 1 QT/ POST 12 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 13 Rave 0.16 LB / 4 OZ/ POST 4.3 gh 45.0 a 38.8 b 85.0 a 17.5 ab 99.0 a 13 2,4-D mine 0.95 LB / 1 QT/ POST 13 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 14 Cimarron 0.0113 LB / 0.3 OZ/ POST 47.5 a 10.0 bc 99.0 a 84.8 a 16.3 ab 99.0 a 14 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST LSD (P=.05) 6.48 15.92 12.52 9.26 9.82 0.00 Standard Deviation 4.54 11.14 8.76 6.48 6.87 0.00 CV 34.19 46.37 51.06 9.04 49.01 0.0 Grand Mean 13.27 24.02 17.16 71.64 14.02 91.93 Bartlett's X2 16.111 10.481 15.552 6.572 10.783 0.0 P(Bartlett's X2) 0.186 0.488 0.159 0.885 0.375. Replicate F 2.378 16.647 9.061 19.884 10.528 0.000 Replicate Prob(F) 0.0846 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 1.0000 Treatment F 26.437 6.196 35.976 45.409 2.510 0.000 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0133 1.0000 Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Duncan's New MRT) Mean comparisons performed only when OV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.

(BPS07506) OV Means Table Page 7 of 7 Pest Type W Weed W Weed W Weed W Weed Pest Code VENL LESSS RUDTR SOLC Pest Name Tall Ironweed Lespedeza sp. Brwn Eye Susan Horsenettle Crop Code FESR FESR BBCH Scale BGRM BGRM Crop Name Tall fescue Tall fescue Part Rated PLNT C PLNT C PLNT P PLNT P PLNT P PLNT P Rating Date 2/ug/2006 2/ug/2006 2/ug/2006 2/ug/2006 2/ug/2006 2/ug/2006 Rating Data Type PHYSTU SDHD SUPPR CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL Rating Unit 0-100 0-100 0-100 0-100 0-100 0-100 Days fter First/Last pplic. 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Trt-Eval Interval 58 D- 33 D- 58 D- 58 D- 58 D- 58 D- Trt Treatment Rate Other Other Growth No. Name Rate Unit Rate Rate Unit Stage 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 Untreated 0.0 b 22.5 d 0.0 g 0.0 b 0.0 g 0.0 f 2 mber 0.0131 LB / 0.28 OZ/ POST 0.0 b 90.0 a 6.3 fg 0.0 b 23.8 ef 5.0 def 2 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 3 mber 0.0164 LB / 0.35 OZ/ POST 0.0 b 62.5 bc 18.8 d-g 0.0 b 43.8 c-f 21.3 abc 3 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 4 mber 0.022 LB / 0.47 OZ/ POST 0.0 b 86.3 ab 26.3 c-f 0.0 b 33.8 def 2.5 ef 4 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 5 mber 0.0263 LB / 0.56 OZ/ POST 0.0 b 80.0 ab 42.5 bcd 0.0 b 22.5 f 15.0 b-f 5 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 6 mber 0.0164 LB / 0.35 OZ/ POST 0.0 b 52.5 c 77.5 a 1.3 b 46.3 cd 18.8 bcd 6 2,4-D mine 0.95 LB / 1 QT/ POST 6 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 7 mber 0.022 LB / 0.47 OZ/ POST 2.5 b 75.0 abc 83.8 a 0.0 b 77.5 a 36.3 a 7 2,4-D mine 0.95 LB / 1 QT/ POST 7 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 8 Rave 0.08 LB / 2 OZ/ POST 0.0 b 87.5 ab 13.8 efg 0.0 b 45.0 cde 12.5 c-f 8 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 9 Rave 0.12 LB / 3 OZ/ POST 0.0 b 88.8 a 46.3 bc 2.5 b 51.3 bcd 15.0 b-f 9 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 10 Rave 0.16 LB / 4 OZ/ POST 2.5 b 87.5 ab 35.0 cde 0.0 b 47.5 bcd 17.5 b-e 10 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 11 Rave 0.2 LB / 5 OZ/ POST 2.5 b 85.0 ab 60.0 ab 0.0 b 42.5 c-f 16.3 b-e 11 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 12 Rave 0.12 LB / 3 OZ/ POST 0.0 b 70.0 abc 60.0 ab 0.0 b 23.8 ef 25.0 abc 12 2,4-D mine 0.95 LB / 1 QT/ POST 12 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 13 Rave 0.16 LB / 4 OZ/ POST 3.8 b 83.8 ab 77.5 a 0.0 b 67.5 ab 22.5 abc 13 2,4-D mine 0.95 LB / 1 QT/ POST 13 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST 14 Cimarron 0.0113 LB / 0.3 OZ/ POST 17.5 a 86.3 ab 31.3 cde 88.8 a 61.3 abc 31.3 ab 14 NIS 0.25 % V/V 1 QT/100 GL POST LSD (P=.05) 6.10 21.53 22.07 3.26 19.07 13.98 Standard Deviation 4.27 15.06 15.44 2.28 13.34 9.78 CV 207.81 19.94 37.35 34.58 31.87 57.36 Grand Mean 2.05 75.54 41.34 6.61 41.88 17.05 Bartlett's X2 4.462 40.255 20.2 2.219 4.085 6.867 P(Bartlett's X2) 0.347 0.001* 0.063 0.33 0.982 0.866 Replicate F 2.901 1.545 1.340 0.570 6.388 11.016 Replicate Prob(F) 0.0470 0.2181 0.2753 0.6380 0.0013 0.0001 Treatment F 4.731 6.267 12.541 428.737 9.168 4.377 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0002 Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Duncan's New MRT) Mean comparisons performed only when OV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.