Multi- Nutrient Variable Application. Much like a Ladder. One Step at a Time. In-Season Cues Secondary & Micros N & S P & K.

Similar documents
OM 2 OM Processes 2 N Processes 3Sinks 4 losses 5 additions

BEST PRACTICES FOR MANAGING NITROGEN IN NO-TILL

Reduced Tillage Fertilizer Management. Bill Verbeten NWNY Dairy, Livestock, & Field Crops Team

Urea Volatilization and Enhanced Efficiency Nitrogen Fertilizers for Small Grains Crop Pest Management School January 6, 2011

Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers

SELECTING THE RIGHT SOURCE OF FERTILIZER N IN MANITOBA

Fertilizer and Nutrient Management of Timothy Hay

Challenges of Soil Nutrient Management

The Future of Controlled-Release Fertilizers

Nitrogen Transformation Inhibitors and Controlled Release Urea

Soil Nutrient Management: Testing, Sources, and Foliar Application Soils Workshops for Hill, Blaine and Phillips Counties Feb.

Nutrient Management for Hay Production and Quality

Potential Uses for Agrotain and Polymer Coated Products

Nutrient Management Conference Feb. 7, 2017, St. Cloud, MN Rick Gilbertson Pro Ag Crop Consultants, Inc.

Overview of the Principles of Nitrogen Management and Sources on Crop Production. Dave Franzen, Ph.D. NDSU Extension Soil Specialist

Nitrogen Management in Direct Seeding Operations

Central Region Ag Agent Update Choteau, April 4, 2017

SULFUR AND NITROGEN FOR PROTEIN BUILDING

The Nitrogen Cycle options for interventions.

Optimizing Fertilizer Applications on Sugar Beet. Jay Norton Soil Fertility Specialist University of Wyoming

Improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Sugarcane with Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers

PASTURE AND HAY FIELDS: SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT. Sanders County April 8, Clain Jones

Split Application- North Dakota Perspective. Dave Franzen, PhD Professor Soil Science Extension Soil Specialist, NDSU, Fargo

Number 209 September 11, 2009

Nutrient Management of Forages and Legumes Crop Pest Management School Bozeman, January 6, 2010

Nitrogen Management Products. John E. Sawyer Professor Soil Fertility Extension Specialist Department of Agronomy

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

Evaluation of Fertilizer Additives for Enhanced Nitrogen Efficiency in Corn. Final Project Report (2013 and 2014)

FERTILIZATION OF FORAGES. Wheatland County May 19, Clain Jones

Successful 4R Nutrient Stewardship Extension Techniques: Fertilizer Rate, Source and Placement

Institute of Ag Professionals

Far West Idaho Conference Twin Falls 2015 V. Paul Hobson, Land View Inc.

Understanding Salt Index of Fertilizers. Carrie Laboski Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-Madison

Fertilizer Management Considerations for Carrie Laboski, Dept. of Soil Science, UW-Madison

Improving Fertilizer Use Efficiency for Horticultural Crops. Tom Obreza and Jerry Sartain Soil and Water Science Dept.

Protecting Your Water and Air Resources

Nitrogen dynamics of standard and enhanced urea in corn

November 2008 Issue # Nutrient Management Considerations in a High-Cost Environment

IMPROVING PERFORMANCE OF RYE COVER CROP SYSTEMS

Clain Jones

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTH-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

Supercharging your P fertilizer Does it Work? Cynthia Grant,

EXPLORING CONTROLLED RELEASE NITROGEN FERTILIZERS FOR VEGETABLE AND MELON CROP PRODUCTION IN CALIFORNIA AND ARIZONA

Comparative Analysis of Enhanced Nitrogen. Fertilizers on Canola

New Crop Nutrition Technologies Nitrogen case. J. David Hernandez Arysta LifeScience Orlando, December 5, 2012

Crop Physiology Laboratory Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Minnesota Wheat Research and Promotion Council

Cycling and Biogeochemical Transformations of N, P and S

FERTILITY RECOMMENDATIONS

Soil Test Laboratory Analysis and Fertilizer Recommendations

Nitrogen Fertilizer Technology Evaluations and Nitrogen. Richard Smith UC Cooperative Extension, Monterey County

Nitrogen & Nutrient Strategies for 2014

R.W. Heiniger Vernon G. James Research and Extension Center North Carolina State University

Timing of Foliar Applications

Nitrogen Management to Increase Nutrient Use Efficiency and Corn Grain Yield

Fertility requirements for peas and alternative crops. Rich Koenig, Extension Soil Fertility Specialist

Cycling and Biogeochemical Transformations of N, P, S, and K

G Fertilizing Winter Wheat I: Nitrogen, Potassium, and Micronutrients

SF723 (Revised) Barley

NITROGEN APPLICATIONS

Fertilizer Management in No- Tillage Cucurbits

Interpreting Nitrate Concentration in Tile Drainage Water

Nutrient Management Considerations in a High Cost. Carrie Laboski Dep. Soil Science, UW-Madison

Soil Sampling & N Management. Nick Andrews (503) x 149

Nitrogen Rate Determination for Winter Wheat. Maximizing the Yield of Winter Wheat. Dale Cowan Agri-Food Laboratories

Variable Rate Starter Fertilization Based on Soil Attributes

EXAMPLE QUESTIONS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION EXAM

Maximize Production using Liquid Fertilizer

Managing Soils for Improved Pasture

NITROGEN FERTILIZER MANAGEMENT OF TEMPORARILY FLOODED SOILS TO IMPROVE CORN PRODUCTION AND REDUCE ENVIROMENTAL N LOSS

Soil health and fertility

Evaluation of ESN Fertilizer in Southcentral Montana

Corn Nitrogen Rate Calculator Impact of Nitrogen Application Timing on Corn Production

Cycles in Nature Standard 1 Objective 2:

ph Management and Lime Material Selection and Application

TRI-STATE FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS CORN, SOYBEANS, WHEAT & ALFALFA FOR. Michigan State University The Ohio State University Purdue University

Nitrogen Management on Sandy Soils: Review of BMPs. Carl Rosen Department of Soil Water and Climate University of Minnesota

Ontario Corn Nitrogen Soil N Survey 2015

DOUG SIBBITT. National Account Manager Ag Specialties.

Nutrient Management in Field Crops MSU Fertilizer Recommendations Crop*A*Syst 2015 Nutrient Management Training

Nitrogen Management Guidelines for Corn in Indiana

Digestate - Maximizing its Value and Use

MANAGING CROPS FOR EXCESS WATER STRESS

Watermelon Response to Soluble and Slow Release Nitrogen Fertilizers

Wasted. fertilizer. is wasted. money. Make the most of your fertilizer investment with AVAIL and NutriSphere-N

SUSTAINABLE NITROGEN FERTILIZER REGIMES FOR SNAP BEANS IN VIRGINIA

NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD. Nutrient Management. (Acre) Code 590

SLOW RELEASE NITROGEN FOR IRRIGATED HARD RED SPRING WHEAT YIELD AND PROTEIN. B. D. Brown University of Idaho, Parma Research and Extension Center

Specialists In Soil Fertility, Plant Nutrition and Irrigation Water Quality Management. Larry Zibilske, Ph.D.

Nitrogen Response Index as a Guide to Fertilizer Management #

Nutrient Management. Things to Know. Chapter 16. Fertilizer Use Concerns. Goals of Fertilizer Usage. Nutrient Balance in Soil. p.

Urea Formaldehydes and Triazones: What We Know Koch Agronomic Services, LLC

Impacts of 4R Nitrogen Management on Drainage Water Quality

Nutrient Reduction Strategy and Best Management Practices

Effect of a rye cover crop and crop residue removal on corn nitrogen fertilization

Addressing Economic & Environmental Risks While No-Tilling

COMPOSTING 101 to 450 Paul Walker Illinois State University - Normal

Variable Rate Starter Fertilization Based on Soil Attributes

Soil Quality, Nutrient Cycling and Soil Fertility. Ray Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

Transcription:

Much like a Ladder One Step at a Time. In-Season Cues Secondary & Micros Multi- Nutrient Variable Application N & S P & K Soil ph

If you have a ph of 4 I don t care what your P, K, S, B, Mg, or anything else looks like. The Bottom 3 steps The Top 3 steps Inter changeable Producer Dependent Field by field N & S P & K Soil ph In-Season Cues Secondary & Micros Multi- Nutrient Variable Application

1. Right Source 2. Right Place 3. Right Rate 4. Right Time IPNI: International Plant Nutrition Institut

Optimum N Rate Max Yield Avg. 51 lb N/ac +/- 39 Avg. 44 bu/ac +/- 15 140 120 Optimum N Rate, lb/ac 100 80 60 40 20 0 N need determined by N-up 112 N-up check * 50% efficiency

What: A high rate of N applied in, across, through, over or under each and every field How Much: Grain only 40 to 60 lbs Dual purpose 60-100 lbs Above Pre-plant How and Where: Min 10 ft wide, 100 yds long, anywhere representative. When: Winter crops; before or after sowing (up to 30 days),

Are Very Visual.. Definite Yes or No Risk Aversion? Sales and Service?

SBNRC gives you a N rate DOES NOT WORK WITH OUT A REFERENCE... Pre-plant best Soon After OK

Two Readings N-Rich Strip Farmer Practice Predict Yield of Each N-Rich Strip YP 40 bu/ac Farmer Practice YP 30 bu/ac Difference 10 Bu/ac 2 lbs N per bushel Rec is 20 lbs N / ac

Yield Prediction SBNRC (YP0*RI =YPN) 100 Pre (100 lbs N/ac applied preplant)

Use of the N-Rich strip is becoming very commercial. 1 consultant 1 st year 8,000 ac 2 nd year 30+

Slow Release Prevents immediate release into soil where environment and biological s have impact. Coated Chemistry Inhibitors Prevent the biological activity that impacts the Nitrogen Cycle Since early 60 s at least 15 substances thoroughly researched

Advantage of these materials is that one application may provide a uniform supply of N to the plants for several weeks. S-coated urea (32-36 %N) breakdown of the S coat (physical barrier) Moisture Polymer Coated Ureas ESN: Temp and Moist IBDU (isobutylidene diurea) is synthetic organic. particle size, soil moisture content and ph. Urea-formaldehyde: microbial & temp Methylene di-urea -CoRoN, Dura_N: Microbial & temp Urea-Triazon- N-Pact, N-Sure: Moist & Microbial. LOOK AT PERCENT SLOW RELEASE 6 to 20%

ESN contains a urea granule nitrogen (N) within a micro-thin polymer coating. This coating allows water within the soil to move into the granule and dissolve the urea inside. The urea solution then moves out through the coating into the soil where it is available to the crop. The rate at which the urea solution moves out through the coating is determined by soil temperature and moisture. In cool soils when the crop is growing slowly, N release is slow. As the soil warms and crop growth increases, the granules release N more quickly and steadily.

Yield and Protein Always equal to UAN when used as a fertilizer source. Reduced amount of Tissue Damage Increased rate w/ seed possible. Using 10-34-0 Wheat < 30 lb N i.e. 25 gal/ac Canola <10 lb N i.e. 8 gal/ac

H 2 O: Rain, Mist, Dew, Humidity, Soil Moisture (NH 2 ) 2 CO 2 NH 3 (gas ) H 2 O SOIL NH 4 SOI NH 4 L NH 4 NH 4

Urease Inhibition Basically prevents/slows urea s conversion to ammonia If ammonia (gas) is formed in absence of moisture or soil surface it will be lost to the atmosphere H 2 O (NH 2 ) 2 CO 2 SOIL

NBPT: Studied since the 80 s Agrotain 7 Day half life (MIC) Maleic Itaconic Coploymer Ca binding of nickel ions necessary for the formation and function of the enzyme Nutrishpere Results Consistently show No benefit

When less or not beneficial Incorporated Rain or irrigation of ½ or more Soil and air temp < 50 Dry soil and Air Banding No rain expected for 14+ days UAN vs Urea

When more beneficial Surface applied No-till High humidity Light rains, heavy dews, mists Soil and air temp > 50 Wet soil Soil with high ph >7.5 Lots of OH in soil Rain within 10 days

Nitrification Inhibition Basically prevents/slows ammonium s conversion to nitrate Ammonium(+) is immobile in the soil Nitrate(-) is mobile. In high rainfall, irrigated, well drained soil NO 3 is easily lost. NO 3 can be lost by leaching and Denitrification Both Take WATER!!!!

Nitrapyrin- Registered Pesticide, studied since the 60 s N-Serve (MIC) Maleic Itaconic Coploymer Ca binding of nickel ions necessary for the formation and function of the enzyme Nutrishpere DCD Suppresses, does not kill nitrosomas Ammonium-Thio-Sulfate: Low ph keep NH4 from going to NH3, short lived.

When less or not beneficial Arid environments Well drained soils that allow infiltration but have limited leaching

When more beneficial Tile Drainage Wet soils Irrigated fields

Avail, which is marketed as a phosphate enhancing product, contains the same active ingredient as Nutrisphere. The Avail activity is attributed to binding of calcium or iron ions in the soil normally bind p. AI of Nutrisphere/Avail, the compound is highly negatively charged and would tend to bind with any compound with a positive charge, not distinguishing one ion over another. Consistent Results showing No benefit.

www.extensionnews.okstate.edu Brian Arnall 373 Ag Hall 405-744-1722 b.arnall@okstate.edu Presentation available @ www.npk.okstate.edu Twitter: @OSU_NPK YouTube Channel: OSUNPK