Lida Textile & Dyeing Ltd. Structural Inspection Report

Similar documents
Structural Inspection Report

Libas Textiles Ltd (9500)

ABA Fashions Ltd. Plot #9, Block F, Tongi, Gazipur-1710 ( N, E) 08 MARCH 2014

Abanti Color Tex Ltd. Plot-S, A-646, Shashongaon Enayetnager, Fatullah, Narayangonj ( E, N) 28 June 2014

Apparel Gallery Ltd.

Avant Garde Fashion Ltd. Ring Shine Textiles Ltd.

A-One Polar Ltd. Bhulta,Rupgonj,Narayangonj. ( , ) 27th April 2014

111 MORGAN ST. Ryan Friis

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017

EVALUATION OF NONLINEAR STATIC PROCEDURES FOR SEISMIC DESIGN OF BUILDINGS

Installing DELTABEAM. Installation of DELTABEAM. Deliveries. Storage on-site

INITIAL STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT REPORT (SIAR)

BUILDING INTEGRITY DEA SUMMARY REPORT

Displacement Based Assessment and Improvement of a Typical New Zealand Building by an Average Engineer

BUILDING INTEGRITY SUMMARY REPORT

Technical Guidance Document TGD-021-6

PRELIMINARY STRUCTURAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

Structural Inspection

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 5, May ISSN

CETE43 FULL-SCALE LOAD TEST ON REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB

Progressive Collapse of Reinforced Concrete Building

Comparative Study of Equivalent Static Analysis and Response spectrum analysis on Flat Slab Using Etabs

THE FORENSIC MEDICAL CENTER

BISON PRECAST FLOORING SPECIFICATION

Connaught. Facility Audit report for: Connaught Regina, SK. Report Created: Page 1 of 20

INTERNSHIP REPORT GOUTHAM.J

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 4, Issue 05, 2016 ISSN (online):

Hale Allen Jones The Institution of Structural Engineers East Anglian Branch Award for Structural Excellence Submission

ST7008 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

MAJOR DEFECTS BUILDING SURVEY REPORT

WORK BELOW LOWEST FLOOR FINISH 1/7 230, , , FRAME 2/6 96, , ,056.00

Measurement and Documentation for Structural Integrity Assessment of an In-Service School. Building at Risk

MODAL PUSHOVER ANALYSIS OF RC FRAME BUILDING WITH STAIRCASE AND ELEVATOR CORE

Technical Report 3. Alyssa Stangl Structural Option Advisor Dr. Linda Hanagan L A J O L L A C O M M O N S P H A S E I I O F F I C E T O W E R

EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF A G+12 STOREY BUILDING WITH AND WITHOUT INFILL FOR BHUJ AND KOYNA EARTHQUAKE FUNCTIONS

CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL BUILDING INSPECTOR CONTENT OUTLINE 01. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 6% Project Administration 1%

RESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST

Comparative Study of R.C.C and Steel Concrete Composite Structures

EARTHQUAKE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS OF BUILDINGS. By Ir. Heng Tang Hai

Chartered Membership Examination

Structural safety requirements of the Building Standard Law (BSL) of Japan and its enforcement system. IRCC Workshop Malmö

BUILDING INTEGRITY SUMMARY REPORT

Franklin Square Hospital Center Patient Tower

SCREEN PORCHES 101 DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES, INC Permit Requirements

Building over or close to a public sewer

Effect of Edge Beam and Shear Wall on the Structural Behavior of Flat Plate Multistoried Building: A Computing Modeling for lateral load Analysis

Statement of Special Inspections Michigan Building Code 2012 (MBC 2012)

5. POST-EARTHQUAKE INSPECTION

151 First Side. Technical Assignment 2 November 16 th, William J. Buchko. AE 481w Senior Thesis The Pennsylvania State University

Comparative Study on Post - Tensioned and Reinforced Concrete flat Slab Systems for a Multistory Building

NON ENGINEERED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGSS

The difference is Guidance for the preparation of Deck Manufacturing Schedules

"Impact of New IS 1893 & Related Codes on Design of tall Buildings, Including Trend Setting Structures

The Passive Fire Protection Handbook

ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS

Design and Estimation of Reinforced Building: A Case Study

Hollowcore Floors. The ideal structural floor solution for all building types in all sectors.

Plan Check No. Checked by: An Appointment Is Required for Verification

FMS Mater Dei Hospital Malta Volume 2: MAU building

Interaction between ductile RC perimeter frames and floor slabs containing precast units

A NAME TRULY CAST IN CONCRETE PRESTRESSED HOLLOW CORE CONCRETE FLOORS & WALLS

DIVISION: WOOD, PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES SECTION: STRUCTURAL PANELS REPORT HOLDER: ENERCEPT, INC.

Effect of Torsion Consideration in Analysis of Multi Storey frame

Our ref: EJM/CE/17226~01. 4 th April Tim Heath - Chair The Blake Cottage Trust House of William Blake 17 South Molton Street London W1K 5QT

Volume 1. HOW TO MAKE A DREAM HOUSE EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT Contents

Structural Comparison between Pan Joist Concrete and Steel Frame Systems for UMCP Student Housing Building B

Lysaght Bondek. Structural steel decking system Design and Construction Manual

POST-TENSIONING APPLICATION AND TECHNOLOGY. Moe Kyaw Aung

Seismic Behaviour of RC Shear Walls

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 2, Issue 09, 2014 ISSN (online):

Structural Products. Multideck 50-V3 Galvanised Steel Floor Decking System

SECTION STEEL DECKING

Structural Assessment Live Fire Training Building. FSCJ South Campus Jacksonville, Florida. Florida State College at Jacksonville

Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit Manual MTPTC Training, April & May Build Change & Degenkolb Engineers

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF SIX STOREYED RC FRAMED BUILDING WITH BRACING SYSTEMS

SECTION 1. AS MASONRY STRUCTURES CODE

MacKenzie Courts Housing Complex PRO 0921 Detailed Engineering Evaluation Quantitative Assessment Report

INTRODUCTION OF A PERFORMANCE-BASED DESIGN

Table of Contents.2. Introduction...3 Gravity Loading and Deflections..4. Existing Structural System..8

NONLINEAR PERFORMANCE OF A TEN-STORY REINFORCED CONCRETE SPECIAL MOMENT RESISTING FRAME (SMRF)

Open mono-stringer. design elements

Global Village Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, New York

The Structural Engineer and Curtain Wall Design. The design of curtain walls entails numerous inputs, including the following

Section A A: Slab & Beam Elevation

Marina Bay Sands Hotel Arch 631 Kayla Brittany Maria Michelle

Halfen systems for the support and restraint of brickwork

155 & 220 Beam Flooring Systems

INFORMATIONAL PACKAGE ACCESSORY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (INCLUDING DETACHED GARAGES, STORAGE BUILDINGS & WORKSHOPS)

RAPID STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

STUDIES ON LOCATION OF SHEAR WALL IN BUILDINGS FOR STRUCTURAL STABILITY

Alternate Design Method- Design Procedure of Two-way Slabs using ACI Moment Coefficients and Approved by BNBC 2013

concrete Precast car park The Avenue MSCP, Bracknell Sustainability by the sea Colwyn Bay seafront Clean water Treating hydro-demolition waste

mortarless masonry Design Manual Part 1 (BS 5628:2005) Section 1 Page 1 BS 5628:2005 CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE USE OF MASONRY

County of Santa Barbara, California Facility Condition Assessment 2014

October 26, 2017 Ref.: Newfoundland & Labrador English School District 95 Elizabeth Avenue St. John s, NL A1B 1R6

Possible solution to past CM exam question. Question 2 July New city centre office block. by Rajavel Inbarajan

Structural Option April 7 th, 2010

On Cold-Formed Steel Construction. Light Gauge Steel Engineers Association Washington, D.C Toll Free (866)

Thin Slabs in Permanent Form Wall Structures

Homebuyers Survey. Final Report. Mr Client. A Home, A Street, A Town. 3rd July 2014

Transcription:

Revision: Issue 1 Date: 9 th February 2015 Lida Textile & Dyeing Ltd. Ltd Holding No. 100/2, Block-B, East Chandura, Ward-8, Shafipur, Kaliakair, Gazipur. (24.036527, 90.272019) 4 th February 2015 Structural Inspection Report Observations & Actions Authors: Hugh Griffin, Connor McGrath Checked by: Hugh Griffin Approved by: Hugh Griffin Category Green 1

2 Executive Summary On 4th February 2015, Mr Hugh Griffin (lead) and Mr Connor McGrath of Arup carried out a visual structural survey of the Lida Textile & Dyeing Ltd complex at the address and co-ordinates given on the cover page of this report. We met with Mr.SaifulMillat, Director, Mr S. M. JecrulIslam, General Manager, and Mr.Kader Siddique, Manager (Construction) of Lida Textile & Dyeing Ltd. Lida Textile & Dyeing Ltd is owned by Mr.Zhuang Lifengwho also owns other factories in the area. Mr.Lifeng owns the building complex. The factory comprises a single 7-storey production building. We inspected all areas of the buildings. Other buildings are currently being constructed within the complex for Lida Textile & Dyeing Ltd. These were not inspected. Ground Floor level is currently being used as a store for construction materials. The ground floor slab has not been constructed. First Floor is used for sewing and finishing. Second and Third Floors are used for storage, although currently there are sections of each floor that are empty. Part of Fourth Floor is being used as a dining area while a new Canteen Building is being constructed. The remainder of the floor is unoccupied. Fifth Floor is used for cutting. Sixth Floor used is mainly open roof area with offices at the West end and offices under construction at the East. Lift Motor Rooms extend above the roof to the office areas. Large sectional water tanks are located in numerous locations, mainly over stairs areas. The building is a reinforced concrete beam and slab structure with piled foundations. A ground bearing ground floor slab will be constructed in the short term. There is an expansion joint at mid point along the length of the building. The building construction commenced in 2013. Permit approval was obtained from the Local Authority in 2014 for a 7 storey building. The permit drawings were presented.

Executive Summary (Continued) A comprehensive set of structural drawings were prepared by DezhouMinyiBuilding Design Co Ltd. who are based in China. There is good agreement between these drawings and the site observations. Test results for concrete cylinders (tested in Bangladesh) and for concrete cubes (tested in China) were made available. A Site Investigation Report was prepared in May 2013 for an 8 storey building by Delta Soil Engineers. This consisted of 66 boreholes and recommended piled foundations. Based on our visual inspection the following high level and non exhaustive list of key concerns are: ITEM 1: Floor Loading We also have concerns regarding the lack of guarding/edge protection at the highest roof levels (roof to offices). Appropriate edge protection should be provided immediately. We see no reason to suspend operations in the Building due to structural concerns (subject to the required actions noted at the end of this report). Further actions with associated priorities and timeframes are given at the end of this report. Please note that these actions should be completed as soon as practically possible and certainly within the time frame noted. We have reviewed the property from an outline seismic perspective and would consider that the building, along with many others in the Dhaka region, to be at significant risk in a major Seismic event. Our Limitations and Assumptions are also noted at the end of this report. 3

4 Building Extents

Coordinates 24.036527, 90.272019 Production Building 5 Site Location Building Extents

Office Building Under construction Computer Warehouse/Store Under Construction Production Building Canteen Building Under construction Location of Buildings within Lida Textile & Dyeing Complex. 6 Building Extents

West Elevation North Elevation East Elevation 7 Building Extents South Elevation (part)

Water Tank and Lift motor room Water Tank Office Roof Cutting Office 5th Dining Empty 4th Storage 3rd Storage 2nd Sewing and finishing 1st Store for construction materials GF Building Extents Current Use of Factory Floors

6 Storey 7 Storey 7 Storey Expansion Joint Number of storeys 9 Building Extents

10 Structural System

Structural System: RC beams with two-way spanning slabs. Lateral stability is assumed to be provided by a moment frame system. Columns: G Fl. 800mm x 800mm RC (Typ) F Fl. to 4th Fl. 700mm x 700mm Grid: see plan Beams: see plan Floor Slab: 130mm thick avg. ( excluding floor 60mm avg. finishes) Floor to Ceiling: 4.15m Foundation: Piled Foundation 6.2m Expansion Joint 5.5m 6.5m Toilets 6.0m 6.0m 4.7m 9.0m 9.0m 9.0m 9.0m 6.5m 5.5m 5.7m Structural System 11 5.0m 9.0m 4.7m 8.7m 9.0m 7.0m 9.0m 9.0m 9.0m 4.7m

Structural System: Longitudinal Beams 360mm W x 570mm D Primary Transverse Beams 360mm W x 480mm D Secondary Transverse Beams 250mm W x 470mm D Building 2 BUILDING 1 Structural System 12

Typical column beam frame structure Structural System 13

14 Non Structural Observation

No edge protection was provided on the roof over office areas Lack of edge protection 15

16 Observations

17 Floor Loading

Observed loading varied up to 3.6kPa on 2 nd and 3 rd floors Area of localised5.5kpa loading at 2 nd floor Maximum imposed floor loading shown as 6.15kPa on wall at First Floor. 18 Floor Loading

Column testing 19 Observations

Columns tested Site measurements and observations correspond to drawings. Stone aggregates 20 Observations Detailed scan result

21 Priority Actions

Problems Observed ITEM 1: Floor Loading 22

Item 1 and actions Floor Loading Priority 1 (Immediate - Now) Priority 2 (within 6-weeks) None required. None required. Priority 3 (within 6-months) Building Engineer to prepare Loading Plans for each floor of the building based on column capacity and beam/slab capacity. Comply with the loading on each floor as specified in the loading plans 23

Survey Limitations and Assumptions This report is for the private and confidential use of Accord for whom it was prepared together with their professional advisorsas appropriate. It should not be reproduced in whole or in part or relied upon by third parties for any use without the express written permission of Arup. This report can be used in discussion with the supplier or factory owner as a means to rectify or address any observations made.the report is not comprehensive and is limited to what could be observed during a visual inspection of the building. This Report is not intended to be treated as a generalised inspection and does not cover the deterioration of structural membersthrough dampness, fungal or insect attack, nor does it deal with problems and defects of a non-structural nature. Other non structural aspects of the building such as fire safety have not been assessed in this survey. Except as otherwise noted, drains and other services were not viewed or tested during our inspection and are therefore similarlyexcluded from this Report. We have not inspected any parts of the structure which are covered, unexposed or inaccessible and we are therefore unable to report that any such part of the property is free from defect. External inspection of the façade walls has generally been carried out from ground level only by visual sighting. No openingupworks were carried out (except as noted) and we rely on the Architects and Engineers drawings provided to us for our views on concealed parts of thestructure and in particular foundations. Strengths of materials and components are untested and we recommend that the factory owners Building Engineer carries out insitu testing over and above those suggested to satisfy themselves with the material strengths and component details. Recommendations, where given, are for the purpose of providing indicative advice only, are not exhaustive, relate solely to identifying key and obvious structural defects as identified in this presentation, and do not take the form of or constitute a specification for works. Wetake no responsibility for the works as constructed. This report does not interfere with the factory owners Building Engineers responsibility for the structural performance of this building, The Building Engineer remains fully responsible for the structural adequacy of the building. This report does not comment in detail on the future seismic performance of the building and only highlights the fact that the building may experience significant damage or collapse in a seismic event along with many others in the Dhaka region. The observations in this report are based on the Engineering Judgement of the lead surveyor/engineer at the time of the survey. We assume in making these observations that no covering up of faults defects, filling or plastering over cracking or significant repair work has been carried out by the building owner. Any future alteration or additional work by the building owner will void this report. 24