Water Control Structures Selected Design Guidelines Alberta Environment Page 14-1

Similar documents
Water Control Structures Selected Design Guidelines Alberta Environment Page 17-1

Water Control Structures Selected Design Guidelines Alberta Environment Page 12-1

Visual Inspection Checklist

Lyon Creek Cedar Way Stormwater Detention Dam Operation and Maintenance Manual

DAM INSPECTION CHECKLIST Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waterways Engineering Division of Dam Safety

(b) Discuss in brief shaft spillway with neat sketches. Marks 04. OR Q (2) Explain in brief USBR stilling basin. Marks 08

Annex V Concrete Structures Removal Plan

Types of Inspections. Prior to Inspection. Types of Inspections. Typical Inspection Equipment. Embankment Dams

Supplemental Watershed Plan Agreement No. 10 for Neshaminy Creek Watershed Core Creek Dam (PA-620) Bucks County, Pennsylvania

Construction Inspection Checklists

Created by Simpo PDF Creator Pro (unregistered version) Asst.Prof.Dr. Jaafar S. Maatooq

Dam Safety Inspection Checklist

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT A. GENERAL

SMALL HYDRO BIG CHALLENGES Renewable Energy World Asia 2016 Martin P. Bieri. September 21, 2016

ENGINEERING CHECKLIST SEDIMENT & STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN CONSTRUCTION

DTE Energy St. Clair Power Plant

2017 Annual Dam and Dike Inspection Report

DAM AND CANAL SAFETY GUIDELINES

q Item meets standard Project ID: X Item not acceptable Contractor: N/A Item not applicable Inspector: C Item requires engineer s cert.

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

DAM SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT GLENWOOD LAKE DAM CLASS B, INTERMEDIATE HAZARD DAM

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER (SWEPCO)

The dam authority of Saxony (LTV) is responsible


Irrigation Rehabilitation Program Design and Construction Standards

Sediment Basin. Fe= (Depends on soil type)

Temporary Watercourse Crossing: Culverts

Filter Tube Barriers (Instream)

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Small Pond Approval. SWM MD-378 Pond Checklist Training 10/17/07. Exemptions EMBANKMENT HEIGHT. Height of Dam Weir Wall

City of Charlotte BMP Maintenance and Inspection Check List Grassed Channels / Swales [Note: a separate form must be used for each BMP]

Brush layering construction

Sediment Basins and Skimmers. Jay Dorsey/John Mathews Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, Division of Soil and Water Resources

Modular Sediment Barriers (Instream)

STORM AND SURFACE WATER 4-1 GENERAL...4-1

Proper Construction of detention and sediment basins and their conversions

Sanitary Sewer Extensions, Lift Stations, and Force Mains Engineering Report Form. I. General Information. 1. Name of Facility:

The Dalles East Fish Ladder Auxiliary Water System Emergency Operation Backup System Alternatives Columbia River, Oregon-Washington

Appendix J Hydrology and Hydraulics

SECTION FACILITY SANITARY SEWERS

SECTION 3 DRAINAGE. 3-1 General. 3-2 Drainage Ordinances and Legal Requirements

Chapter 11 Culverts and Bridges

LOS ANGELES RIVER/RIO HONDO DIVERSION 2 LEVEE SYSTEM LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA NLD SYSTEM ID #

ABOUT US HISTORY PRODUCTS -1-

SECTION EXCAVATING, BACKFILLING, AND COMPACTION FOR UTILITIES

Mr. Paul Dunlap, California Department of Water Resources

SECTION STORM DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

North and South Dams Project Overview

9.2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS

Module 3. Irrigation Engineering Principles. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL

Irrigation System. BWCDD Zanjero Training 2/13/2008

Geneva Dam. Design of a Steep, Temporary, Riprap Ramp

Chapter A-15. CID-MO Structural Analysis

LOS ANGELES RIVER/RIO HONDO DIVERSION 2 LEVEE SYSTEM LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA NLD SYSTEM ID #

Types of Hydropower Facilities

Aging Outlet Conduits Through Earthen Dams John Harrison, PE Schnabel Dam Engineering, Inc.

Standards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey May 2012 STANDARD FOR SLOPE PROTECTION STRUCTURES. Definition

Ponds. Pond A water impoundment made by excavating a pit, or constructing a dam or an embankment.

John Hart Generating Station Replacement Project. May 2017 Community Construction Update Report #47

Annex I Lyons Ferry Hatchery Modification Plan

United States Army Corps of Engineers. Addicks and Barker Dam Safety Update

TUG - Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management 1

1 Small Hydro Power Plants Wetzmann

2C-12 Detention Basin Outlet Structures

Evaluation of New Concrete Shrinkage Reducing Additive for Glen Elder Dam Spillway Inlet Slab Repair

Chapter 12 Storage. Contents. Overview... 1

Stormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia

2017 ANNUAL DAM AND DIKE INSPECTION REPORT

Outlet Flow Velocity in Circular Culvert

2.1 Backfill - General

CHAPTER 200 STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS

MODEL Stormwater Local Design Manual. City of Centerville

Highway Drainage 1- Storm Frequency and Runoff 1.1- Runoff Determination

Engineering Design Center. Standard Drawings. 1st Edition -January 2016

Drainage structure refers to manholes, catch basins, leaching basins, inlets and drop inlets. Drainage structures are designated as follows.

Table of Contents. 5-5 Release Rates Year Allowable Release Rate WQCV Release Rate EURV Release Rate...

Chapter Table of Contents

Chapter 5 Hydraulic Structures

Ground Improvement for Mitigation of Failure Risks to Existing Embankment Dams

APPENDIX G HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE

PART V - STORM DRAIN DESIGN CRITERIA

APPENDIX A EARTHEN EMBANKMENT. VERSION 1.0 March 1, 2011

This material was downloaded from the website Please contact the PhillyH2O webmaster for more information about this material.

ODOT Design & Construction Requirements for MSE Walls

supplement scheme The Berg Water Project

CHECK THE LOWER RIGHT CORNER OF EACH DETAIL FOR THE LATEST REVISION.

Geotechnical Design and Factors of Safety

Stormwater Management Criteria

The Enginering Important Components of Jatibarang Dam, Semarang, Indonesia

WAIKOLOA RESERVOIR NO. 1 EARTHQUAKE REPAIR PROJECT Information Sheet

Annex O Irrigation Systems Modification Plan

ACTIVITY: Wet Detention Basin ST 02

Irrigation Structures 2. Dr. M. R. Kabir

Constructed Wetland Pond T-8

Fencing, locks on access manholes, and other necessary precautions shall be provided to prevent trespassing, vandalism, and sabotage.

level control gates Waterman Industries of Egypt WATERMAN

Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Extended Detention Basin (EDB) Sedimentation Facility

PARR HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT PARR HYDRO DEVELOPMENT & FAIRFIELD PUMPED STORAGE FACILITY DEVELOPMENT FERC PROJECT No SC SEPTEMBER 19, 2012

Transcription:

Alberta Environment Page 14-1 14.0 LOW LEVEL OUTLET WORKS 14.1 General In general, a low level outlet structure can be used to provide one or more of the following functions: Supply adequate water to meet downstream needs. Facilitate the drawdown of the reservoir during an emergency or to allow for inspection and maintenance work to be carried out. Serve as a diversion structure during construction. Accommodate hydropower generation. The low level outlet structure typically consists of a reinforced concrete intake structure, conduit, gatewell, and terminal structure. A typical arrangement is shown on Figure 14-1. 14.2 Structure Location and Layout The structure should normally be sited on the most competent portion of the dam foundation, preferably close to an abutment, so that vertical and horizontal movements (settlement and spreading) that may occur over the length of the structure are minimized. In addition, it is preferred that the low level outlet be located well away from the spillway structure. The gatewell is normally located just upstream from the crest of the dam in order to minimize the pressurized (water) length of conduit that is located within the impervious core of the dam, and to facilitate access. 14.3 Seepage and Drainage Measures Seepage control is ordinarily provided by the impervious backfill placed around the structure as part of the impervious core of the dam embankment. Seepage collars cast directly around the conduits should not be used since they can cause stress concentrations as discussed in Section 13.4. To prevent piping along the outside wall of the conduit, a zone of filter material, possibly in conjunction with drainage gravel, is normally provided around the downstream end of the conduit, and properly tied in with the drainage measures provided at the terminal structure. 14.4 Intake Structure An intake structure is usually used to provide good entrance conditions into the conduit, and to permit auxiliary appurtenances such as a bulkhead or stop log closure device, trash rack, or fish screen if required, to be installed. The intake structure and conduit are designed to resist the uplift

Alberta Environment Page 14-2 forces that would occur when the bulkhead or stop log device is in place and the conduit is dewatered, or the trashrack or fish screen becomes plugged. In some instances such as where sediment deposition or water quality is a concern, consideration can be given to providing a high level intake, or an overflow crest with vertical shaft with some features similar to that described in Section 13.5. 14.5 Conduit The design of the conduit is discussed in Section 13.6. For precast concrete pipe, connection details between the pipe and the gatewell structure, where founded on a competent foundation, are as illustrated on Figures 14-2 and 14-3. An air vent must be provided within the section of each conduit located immediately downstream of the control gate in order to prevent the development of negative pressures and pressure surges. Information for sizing the air vent can be found in Smith (1995). Ideally, the invert at the downstream end of the conduit should be set well above the bed of the outlet channel so that it is free draining and free of ice during the winter in order to facilitate access for inspection and maintenance when the structure is not being operated. 14.6 Gatewell A gatewell is ordinarily provided to house and permit access to the flow control gate. Depending on the type of gate used, the gatewell would operate either as a wet well (slide gate) or a dry well (bonnet gate). The provision of either an upstream emergency bulkhead or guard gate is required to permit inspection and maintenance. Consideration should also be given to providing a smaller diameter bypass pipe system to facilitate the release of small flows without having to operate the primary control gate at partial openings. In some cases, such as where water must be continuously released in order to meet downstream riparian requirements, a gatewell with twin gate bays may be required so that releases can be maintained while the gate in one bay is being serviced. As part of the stability analyses, the wet well should be checked for the case when it is dewatered for inspection or maintenance purposes with the reservoir at FSL, whereas the dry well should be checked for the reservoir at FSL and the peak IDF level. For a specific installation, special care is required in identifying all of the conditions and loading combinations that can occur. Some examples of conditions and loading combinations that may apply for a typical wet well installation are provided below. The load symbols are defined in Section 4.0, and load factors are discussed in Section 9.0.

Alberta Environment Page 14-3 Construction Condition: D+E+V (surcharge) Usual Condition D+E+H FSL (external and internal)+u FSL D+E+H SDF (external and internal)+u SDF Unusual Condition D+ E+ H FSL (external and internal)+q Extreme Condition D+E+H IDF (external and internal)+u IDF D+E+ H FSL (external and internal)+q MDE The wet well should be designed to prevent leakage from the interior of the wet well into the surrounding embankment. Consequently, the resulting crack widths, particularly under Usual Loading Conditions, should be reviewed as discussed in Section 9.1.1. Similarly, some examples of conditions and loading combinations that may apply for a typical dry well installation are provided below. The load symbols are defined in Section 4.0, and load factors are discussed in Section 9.0. Construction Condition: D+E+V (surcharge) Usual Condition D+ E+H FSL (external)+u FSL D+ E+H SDF (external)+u SDF Unusual Condition D+ E+H FSL (external)+u FSL +Q Extreme Condition D+E+H IDF (external)+u IDF D+ E+H FSL (external)+u FSL +Q MDE

Alberta Environment Page 14-4 14.7 Terminal Structure The terminal structure for a low level outlet structure should preferably consist of a hydraulic jump stilling basin, subject to appropriate tailwater conditions. Where the properties of the outlet channel are too variable or complex to allow for determining reliable tailwater conditions, an impact basin or a baffle chute drop may be used subject to the qualifications outlined in Sections 13.7.3 and 13.7.4. Erosion protection requirements downstream of the terminal structure are discussed in Sections 12.7.1, 13.7.3, and 13.7.4. 14.8 Cavitation For a low level outlet structure, conditions that can lead to cavitation may exist immediately downstream of the control gate. As a result, the potential for cavitation should be examined and appropriate measures provided as outlined in Section 12.8. For heads above 45 m, EM 1110-2- 1602 (1980) suggests that a metal liner should be provided within the conduit immediately downstream of the gate; however for heads below 45 m, a liner should not be required.