SH 34 Corridor Study & Environmental Assessment:

Similar documents
Grayson County Tollway Routing & Feasibility Study:

Route 7 Corridor Improvements Project Reston Avenue to Jarrett Valley Drive Public Hearing

PUBLIC HEARING LOOP 9

An Overview and Comparison of the Tennessee Department of Transportation s Environmental Evaluation Process

I-70 East PACT DRAFT EVALUATION DATA

State Route 8 Bridge Replacement Project

Northwest State Route 138 Corridor Improvement Project

Categorical Exclusion (CE)

Project Steering Committee April 14, 2015

Overview of the Project Development Process. Brian Blanchard, PE Assistant Secretary for Engineering and Operations

Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study. Technical Advisory Committee/Agency Coordination. Kick-Off Meeting

I-10 CONNECT. Public Meeting #1

Chapter 2: Alternatives

Programmatic Categorical Exclusions

1. Introduction Noise Analysis Results Figures. List of Tables

IH 820 Corridor Improvement Study Randol Mill Road To North SH 121 Interchange. Public Meeting. Thursday April 4, 2013

APPENDIX A. NEPA Assessment Checklist

I-10 KENDALL EXTENSION. Open House

WELCOME IL 47. Community Advisory Group Meeting #5 Waubonsee Community College Wednesday, May 31, 2017

CHAPTER 9 DISCUSSIONS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

U S H I G H W A Y 1 4 F I N A L E N V I R O N M E N T A L I M P A C T S T A T E M E N T ( F E I S

County of Calaveras Department of Planning

Northern Intermodal Transit Facility WHAT IS AN INTERMODAL TRANSIT FACILITY?

SR 9/I-95 Interchange at 45th Street PD&E Study Palm Beach County, Florida FPID No.: FAP No.: ETDM No.

Draft Environmental Assessment Terminal B/C Redevelopment, Secure National Hall, and Related Improvements

Green Line Extension EOT. Project Location. Project Purpose. Environmental Impact Report Public Scoping Session

WINDFARM DEVELOPMENT. FM 1847, Pharr District, Cameron County. Date. Footer Text

SH 35 Public Meeting

MDX Contract #: RFP MDX Work Program #: ETDM #: 11501

CHAPTER 26. REGIONAL MOBILITY AUTHORITIES SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS SUBCHAPTER B. CREATION OF A REGIONAL MOBILITY AUTHORITY

Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

TRANS-TEXAS CORRIDOR-35 REGIONAL/STATE UPDATE

Blacklands Corridor Feasibility Study. Public Meeting March 20, 2014 Fletcher Warren Civic Center Greenville, TX

State Road (S.R.) 12 (Florida Arts Trail PD&E)

3.0 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

1RUWKZHVW#:LFKLWD 0DMRU#,QYHVWPHQW#6WXG\

Draft Final Report HOUSTON FRIENDSWOOD HARRIS CO. GALVESTON CO. Figure. Arterial. RR Tracks. County Line

Downtown Estes Loop Project Frequently Asked Questions

Factor Potential Effects Mitigation Measures

Currituck County Moyock Mega-Site Market Feasibility Study March 28, 2016

Project Planning area. King County Department of Transportation Road Services Division

PUBLICATIONS MAPS DATA

TIER 1 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT. 7. Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Mitigation Strategies

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION/ GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

SR 29 Project Development & Environment Study. Presentation to SR 29 Stakeholders Advisory Committee. January 23, 2014

Final Design Guideline

TRANS-TEXAS CORRIDOR-35 CURRENT ISSUES

Interchange Workshop Report (August 2004)

Blacklands Corridor Feasibility Study

I-10 Mobile River Bridge. & Bayway Widening

Categorical Exclusion Programmatic Agreement Between the Federal Highway Administration And the Indiana Department of Transportation

Trans-Texas Corridor-35 Update

New Jersey Department of Transportation. Local Freight Impact Fund Handbook. Procedures and Criteria for Local Freight Impact Fund Grant Program

North Central Texas Council of Governments 157

Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Lower Green River Corridor Plan Request for Proposals:

HORIZON 2030: Plan Projects November 2005

CITY OF PHOENIX URBAN RENEWAL PLAN

RURAL RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL RESIDENTIAL ALL COMMUNITIES

State Highway 10A Improvements (from the SH-10 junction extending 6.18 miles east to the SH-100 junction, Muskogee and Sequoyah Counties, Oklahoma)

SR 417 Extension. June 2003 INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY PROJECT SCOPE AND PURPOSE STUDY OBJECTIVE STUDY PHASES

LONE HILL TO WHITE DOUBLE TRACK STUDY Community Open Houses May 16 & 17

On behalf of the Carolina Crossroads project team we thank you for taking the time to attend this meeting.

GOAL 13 ENERGY CONSERVATION

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration. RECORD OF DECISION June 2014

Overview of City of Dallas and DART Interlocal Agreements

PROJECT SCOPING PHASE ~ SCOPE OF SERVICES MAIN STREET BRIDGE OVER WINOOSKI RIVER CITIES OF BURLINGTON & WINOOSKI VERMONT

Staff Report and Draft Findings

Agenda NC Turnpike Authority 2008 Legislative Support Garden Parkway Draft EIS Stakeholder Involvement Major Milestones The Recommended Alternative Wh

South Santa Fe Drive Corridor Redevelopment Plan (An Urban Renewal Plan)

Outcomes. Kelly Karll-SEMCOG Margaret Barondess - MDOT

6.0 Indirect Effects and Cumulative Impacts

2005- City of Claremont Water Acquisition Timeline

Rapid City Area Metropolitan Planning Organization OPERATIONS PLAN

CAPRA National Accreditation Standards

Public Meeting. US Highways 18 & 281 and SD Highway 50 From Douglas County Line to SD46 Charles Mix County

APPROVAL TO SUBMIT COMMENTS ON I-45 AND MORE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Chapter 13: Wildlife and Vegetation

GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITERIA for Non-freeway Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.1 BACKGROUND ES.2 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT

Standard Performance Attributes for Transportation Projects

Final Quiet Zone Work Plan

Sunrise Project South I-205 Corridor Improvement Project

CHAPTER 21: COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES

Welcome and thank you for your interest in the proposed Baltimore-Washington Superconducting Maglev Project.

IX. STRATEGIC PLAN ELEMENT

King of Prussia Rail Project Valley Forge Homes Backyard Visits. Summary of Activities

TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION 9-1

Environmental Information Worksheet

Chapter 10 Natural Environment

Provincial Policy Statement 2014 Training Aid

7.0 Stakeholder and Public Outreach

EXHIBIT A. TRANSIT AND MULTIMODAL DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT CONTINUING SERVICES SCOPE OF SERVICES FM No

Memorandum. FROM: Jim Ortbal Rosalynn Hughey Barry Ng TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL. DATE: June 16, 2017

October 19, 2017 Community Engagement Panel Meeting #4 Overview of Environmental Effects

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS EXECUTIVE SEARCH SERVICES. Issuance Date November 27, 2017

Suncoast Parkway 2/SR Toll 589 FPID: & 3, -4

NORTH I-75 MASTER PLAN Summary Report

Regional Mobility Authorities in Texas

Abbreviated State Final Environmental Impact Statement

Department: Physical Classification: Union: Wage Class: Salary Range: Organizational Summary: Job Description-Planning & Zoning Admin.

Transcription:

SH & Environmental Page 1 SH & Environmental : from Kaufman (SH 243) to Terrell (north of IH 20) Third Series TxDOT 80 557 80 The SH Corridor 20 20 175 SH Study Area Boundary 243 175

SH & Environmental Page 2 80 557 80 SH Corridor Growth 20 20 YEAR Terrell POPULATION 2005 14,000 2030 60,000 175 175 SH 243 Kaufman Kaufman Co. 7,000 80,000 19,000 278,000 Project Development Process Identify Need Metropolitan Mobility Plan Feasibility & Routing Study Preliminary Design Schematic Environmental Focus of our project Final (detailed) Design Right-of-Way Purchasing Construction

SH & Environmental Page 3 TxDOT 1996 Feasibility Study Kaufman Co. Thoroughfare Plan

SH & Environmental Page 4 80 80 557 Terrell Bypass (SH ) 20 20 From Kings Creek to Airport Rd. SH 175 Other Nearby Projects... Kaufman SH Relocation From SH to SH 243 243 175 Ex is t SH i ng Kaufman SH Relocation SH 243 80 80 557 20 Kaufman SH Relocation FM 18 36 From SH to SH 243 SH 175 t ds lroa Rai 20 243 175

SH & Environmental Page 5 Trans Corridor... See www.keeptexasmoving.com or call 1-877-872-6789 Trans Corridor... See www.keeptexasmoving.com or call 1-877-872-6789 SH Study Area Boundary

SH & Environmental Page 6 Opportunities for Input & Information Community Advisory Group Residents, businesses, institutions, commuters, environmental org s Technical Advisory Committee Technical Staff & Elected Officials from governmental and regulatory agencies Public Meetings Open to All interested parties Public Involvement Public Hearing Open to All interested parties Public Involvement Tools Advisory Group Meetings / Hearing Briefings & Presentations Print Media Newsletters Web site www.corridor.org

SH & Environmental Page 7 October 2004 MEETING HIGHLIGHTS Concerns with Alternatives In Residential Areas Evaluate Improvements to Existing SH Evaluate Alternatives East of SH Complete Quantitative Alternative Analysis Clarify Traffic Demands Coordinate with Community & Local Gov t. November 2005 MEETING HIGHLIGHTS Concerns with Alternatives In Residential Areas Against Widening Existing SH Against Widening Existing FM 987 Most Comments in Favor of Middle Corridor Alignments Continue Community & Local Gov t.. Involvement

SH & Environmental Page 8 Project Goals Solutions For 2030 And Beyond Improve Mobility In Kaufman County Improve Safety On SH Maximize Positive Environmental And Socio-economic Opportunities Minimize Negative Environmental And Socio-economic Effects Achieve Affordable And Cost-Effective Transportation Solutions Screening Alternatives Study Duration Number of Alternatives Level of Detail Locally Preferred Alternative

SH & Environmental Page 9 Comparing Alternatives Mobility & Safety Benefits Environmental Effects Social & Economic Effects Cost Effectiveness & Affordability Other Effects Major Negative Effect Some Negative Effect No Effect, Neutral Some Positive Effect Major Positive Effect - - - o + ++ Future Traffic FM 987 YEAR Terrell Kaufman Kaufman Co. POPULATION 2005 14,000 7,000 80,000 2030 60,000 19,000 278,000 TRAFFIC SH ALTERNATE CURRENT CONDITIONS IF IMPROVE EXISTING IF BUILD NEW LOCATION YEAR 2004 2025 2025 FM 987 4,000 7,400 5,900 NEW SH NA NA 10,700 EXISTING SH 8,000 14,700 5,500

SH & Environmental Page 10 80 EXISTING ROW Proposed Roadway 160 PROPOSED ROW 160 PROPOSED ROW 80 EXISTING ROW Proposed Roadway 160 PROPOSED ROW 160 PROPOSED ROW Existing SH North of IH 20

SH & Environmental Page 11 Natural Environment... Mature Woodlands Wetlands Floodplains Water quality Parks, 4(f) Properties Threatened and Endangered Species Mitigation Sites Air Pollution Air Quality Conformity SH Human Environment... Land Use/Land Cover Utilities Hazardous Materials Cultural Resources - Historic/Archeological Cemeteries Urban Influences Environmental Justice Noise Visual Intrusion Property Acquisition & Relocations Construction Impacts SH

SH & Environmental Page 12 Nov. 2005 Alignment Alternatives 20 Existing SH 2578 2728 175 243 Nov. 2005 Alignment Alternatives 20 Existing SH 2578 West Alignments H, I & J 2728 Middle Alignments D, E, F & G 175 243 East Alignments B & C

SH & Environmental Page 13 EAST MIDDLE WEST 1996 1996 FM Existing Existing 1996 FM FM 2728 / Locally Rail Road LPA FM 2578 / SH SH LPA 2578 / Abner Rd. Preferred Alignment South 2578 FM 987 ALTERNATIVE No Build Improved Offset FM 987 Alternative Offset Offset A B C D E F G H I J EXIST. EAST ALTS. MIDDLE ALTS. WEST ALTS. Alignment Length Note 10.1 10.1 11.2 9.9 9.6 10.3 10.2 14.4 11.4 11.2 (mi) Estimated ROW Area Needed (ac) 1 0 98 131 177 166 176 185 193 1 168 Lane Miles Added 2 0 20.3 27.0 36.5.1 36.3 38.3 39.9 27.7.6 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EFFECTS Affect on Access / Economic 3 - - O O + + + + O O + Development Number of Displaced Homes 4 0 44 42 2 4 29 2 5 9 8 Number of Displaced 5 0 6 8 4 3 2 2 0 2 2 Businesses Number of Nearby Structures (within 500 ft) 6 0 284 287 95 103 146 97 102 212 159 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS HAZMAT Sites 7 0 3 3 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 Length within 100 Yr. Floodplain (mi) 8 0.8 0.8 1.0 2.5 4.6 2.3 2.0 3.0 0.9 1.0 Wetland Area (ac) 9 0.4 0.5 0.1 8.1 0.7 7.3 6.4 0.3 1.1 1.2 Woodland Area (ac) 10 0.0 1.6 0.7 51.9 52.2 44.6 51.3 20.2 25.5 24.5 Park Area (ac) 11 0 2.2 2.2 0 0 0.6 0 0 0 0 Historic Sites (within 500 ft) 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Archeological Sites 13 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 OTHER EFFECTS Difficulty / Disruption in 14 O - - - - O O O O - - - - - Construction COSTS Estimated Construction Costs 15 0 $110.2 $122.3 $108.8 $96.5 $93.3 $93.7 $145.0 $118.6 $107.9 ($million) Estimated ROW Costs ($million) 16 0 $18.5 $15.8 $3.8 $5.1 $9.4 $3.1 $4.6 $8.9 $6.1 Total Costs ($million) 17 0 $128.7 $138.1 $112.6 $101.6 $102.7 $96.7 $149.6 $127.5 $114.0 EAST MIDDLE WEST 1996 1996 FM Existing Existing 1996 FM FM 2728 / Locally Rail Road LPA FM 2578 / SH SH LPA 2578 / Abner Rd. Preferred Alignment South 2578 FM 987 ALTERNATIVE No Build Improved Offset FM 987 Alternative Offset Offset A B C D E F G H I J EXIST. EAST ALTS. MIDDLE ALTS. WEST ALTS. Alignment Length Note 10.1 10.1 11.2 9.9 9.6 10.3 10.2 14.4 11.4 11.2 (mi) Estimated ROW Area Needed (ac) 1 0 98 131 177 166 176 185 193 1 168 Lane Miles Added 2 0 20.3 27.0 36.5.1 36.3 38.3 39.9 27.7.6 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EFFECTS Affect on Access / Economic 3 - - O O + + + + O O + Development Number of Displaced Homes 4 0 44 42 2 4 29 2 5 9 8 Number of Displaced 5 0 6 8 4 3 2 2 0 2 2 Businesses Number of Nearby Structures (within 500 ft) 6 0 284 287 95 103 146 97 102 212 159 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS HAZMAT Sites 7 0 3 3 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 Length within 100 Yr. Floodplain (mi) 8 0.8 0.8 1.0 2.5 4.6 2.3 2.0 3.0 0.9 1.0 Wetland Area (ac) 9 0.4 0.5 0.1 8.1 0.7 7.3 6.4 0.3 1.1 1.2 Woodland Area (ac) 10 0.0 1.6 0.7 51.9 52.2 44.6 51.3 20.2 25.5 24.5 Park Area (ac) 11 0 2.2 2.2 0 0 0.6 0 0 0 0 Historic Sites (within 500 ft) 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Archeological Sites 13 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 OTHER EFFECTS Difficulty / Disruption in 14 O - - - - O O O O - - - - - Construction COSTS Estimated Construction Costs 15 0 $110.2 $122.3 $108.8 $96.5 $93.3 $93.7 $145.0 $118.6 $107.9 ($million) Estimated ROW Costs ($million) 16 0 $18.5 $15.8 $3.8 $5.1 $9.4 $3.1 $4.6 $8.9 $6.1 Total Costs ($million) 17 0 $128.7 $138.1 $112.6 $101.6 $102.7 $96.7 $149.6 $127.5 $114.0 Nov. 2005 Altern - ative Evaluation Nov. 2005 Altern - ative Evaluation Middle Alternative was Preferred Corridor For lower cost and lower impacts

SH & Environmental Page 14 Final Alignment Alternatives 20 Existing SH Middle Alignments D, E, F & G New Alignment K 175 243 EAST MIDDLE WEST NEW 1996 1996 FM Existing Existing 1996 FM FM 2728 / Locally Rail Road LPA FM 2578 / SH SH LPA 2578 / Abner Rd. Preferred Alignment South 2578 FM 987 ALTERNATIVE No Build Improved Offset FM 987 Alternative Offset Offset A B C D E F G H I J EXIST. EAST ALTS. MIDDLE ALTS. WEST ALTS. Alignment Length Note 10.1 10.1 11.2 9.9 9.6 10.3 10.2 14.4 11.4 11.2 (mi) Estimated ROW Area Needed (ac) 1 0 98 131 177 166 176 185 193 1 168 Lane Miles Added 2 0 20.3 27.0 36.5.1 36.3 38.3 39.9 27.7.6 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EFFECTS Affect on Access / Economic 3 - - O O + + + + O O + Development Number of Displaced Homes 4 0 44 42 2 4 29 2 5 9 8 Number of Displaced 5 0 6 8 4 3 2 2 0 2 2 Businesses Number of Nearby Structures (within 500 ft) 6 0 284 287 95 103 146 97 102 212 159 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS HAZMAT Sites 7 0 3 3 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 Length within 100 Yr. Floodplain (mi) 8 0.8 0.8 1.0 2.5 4.6 2.3 2.0 3.0 0.9 1.0 Wetland Area (ac) 9 0.4 0.5 0.1 8.1 0.7 7.3 6.4 0.3 1.1 1.2 Woodland Area (ac) 10 0.0 1.6 0.7 51.9 52.2 44.6 51.3 20.2 25.5 24.5 Park Area (ac) 11 0 2.2 2.2 0 0 0.6 0 0 0 0 Historic Sites (within 500 ft) 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Archeological Sites 13 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 OTHER EFFECTS Difficulty / Disruption in 14 O - - - - O O O O - - - - - Construction COSTS Estimated Construction Costs 15 0 $110.2 $122.3 $108.8 $96.5 $93.3 $93.7 $145.0 $118.6 $107.9 ($million) Estimated ROW Costs ($million) 16 0 $18.5 $15.8 $3.8 $5.1 $9.4 $3.1 $4.6 $8.9 $6.1 Total Costs ($million) 17 0 $128.7 $138.1 $112.6 $101.6 $102.7 $96.7 $149.6 $127.5 $114.0 Final Altern -ative Evalua -tion New Alignment K is Technically Preferred Alignment For lower cost and lower impacts

SH & Environmental Page 15 Environmental 1. Land use; 2. Social impacts; 3. Relocation and rightof-way requirements; 4. Economic development; 5. Environmental justice; 6. Joint development; 7. Air quality; 8. Noise; 9. Permits; 10. Water quality; 11. Wetlands; 12. Jurisdictional waters; 13. Floodplains; 14. Visual impacts; 15. Construction impacts; 16. Prime and unique farmlands; 17. Pedestrian & bicycle facilities; 18. 4(f) properties & open space; 19. Recreational uses; 20. Water body mod. and wildlife; 21. Wild and scenic rivers; 22.Threatened and endangered species; 23.Historic and archeological preservation; 24. Hazardous waste sites; 25. Energy conservation; 26.Short-term uses and long-term productivity; and 27.Irreversible and irretrievable commitments. Work Group Meetings Interagency & Organize Work Groups Data Collection/Mapping Develop Strategies & Altern s Develop Detailed Alternatives Select Locally Preferred Alt. Report Compilation Schematic Develop./Analysis Draft Environmental Assess. Review / Process Schematic/EA Public Hearing Finalize Environ. Document Final Approval SH Schedule 2005 J F M A M J J A S O N D Technical Work Group Community Group 2006 2007 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M AM J J A S O N D Updated April 4, 2006

SH & Environmental Page 16 1. TxDOT Obtains: Environmental Clearance Local Agency Agreements Approved Right of Way Map Funding Release from TxDOT Austin to Begin Acquisition Process 2. TxDOT Orders: Property Title Information Five Year Sales Data Preliminary Title Commitment TxDOT then makes pre-appraisal contacts with property owners.

SH & Environmental Page 17 3. TxDOT Assigns Independent Appraisers: Appraisers Contacts Owner Appraisers Submit Appraisals TxDOT Reviews Appraisals for Approval 4. TxDOT s Acquisition Agent Presents Offer to Property Owner, Including: Appraised Value of Property Compensable Damages to Remaining Real Property Relocation Assistance

SH & Environmental Page 18 5. Property Owner may then: a. Donate Land, b. Accept Offer, c. Submit Counter Offer, if Appropriate. d. Begin Eminent Domain Proceedings, if Agreement on Value is not Reached. 5b. When Owner Accepts: Owner Signs Deed & Memorandum of Agreement TxDOT Issues Warrant to Owner & Title Company Owner Closes at Title Company and is Compensated for New Right-of-Way

SH & Environmental Page 19 5c. Owner Counter Offers: Owner May Submit Counter Offer if Owner Believes it does not Represent Fair Market Value TxDOT Reviews Counter Offer and Either Accepts or Rejects It If Rejected, Owner may Accept Original Offer or Proceed to Eminent Domain 5d. Eminent Domain: Court Appoints 3 Commissioners to Hear Owner & TxDOT Commissioners Decide Award TxDOT Deposits Award in Registry of Court & Takes Possession Either Owner or TxDOT Shall Have the Right to Appeal to Jury Trial

SH & Environmental Page 20 6. Relocation Assistance Administered by the State Available to those who qualify as a result of the acquisition of R.O.W. 6a. Relocation Assistance CONT. The Benefits Are Applicable To All Individuals, Families, Businesses, Farmers, Ranchers And Non-Profit Organizations Without Regard To Race, Color, Religion, Sex, Or National Origin.

SH & Environmental Page 21 6b. Relocation Assistance CONT. If The Owner Will Need to Move, Do Not Do So Until Negotiations Have Begun Unless You First Secure A Written Notice Of Intent To Acquire From The Acquiring Agency. 6c. Relocation Assistance CONT. Appeal Procedures Are Available For Displacees Who Do Not Agree With Any Amounts Offered For Relocation Reimbursement. (See Page 48 Of The Relocation Assistance Booklet)

SH & Environmental Page 22 6d. Relocation Assistance CONT. See Pages 39 & 40 In The Relocation Assistance Booklet For Regulations Governing The Relocation Of Advertising Signs Which Are Not Purchased By The Acquiring Agency As Real Property. For More Information Stephen Endres, P.E. TxDOT Project Manager of Transportation P.O. Box 133067 Dallas, 75313-3067 3067 Phone: 214-320 320-6100 Fax: 214-320 320-4470 Email: sendres@dot.state.tx.us Matt Craig, P.E. Consultant Project Manager Halff Associates, Inc. 8616 Northwest Plaza Dr. Dallas, 75225 Phone: 214-6 6-62006200 Fax: 214-739 739-70867086 Email: mcraig@halff.com Website: www.corridor.org