NARRATIVE REPORT 1.0 BUILDING INFORMATION 2.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY INFORMATION

Similar documents
NARRATIVE REPORT. Hard Fittings on Millboard Insulation (residual)

NARRATIVE REPORT 1.0 BUILDING INFORMATION 2.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY INFORMATION

NARRATIVE REPORT. Robinson Hall was originally constructed in 1976; there was a 2001 renovation throughout the building.

NARRATIVE REPORT 1.0 BUILDING INFORMATION 2.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY INFORMATION

NARRATIVE REPORT 1.0 BUILDING INFORMATION 2.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY INFORMATION

NARRATIVE REPORT 1.0 BUILDING INFORMATION 2.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY INFORMATION

NARRATIVE REPORT. Underlayment Paper for Linoleum. Window Glazing (4 types)

Asbestos Procedures. Asbestos Abatement and Repair

ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT: Building No. 14 Hart Hall

Enclosed please find the inspection report for the above-referenced location.

ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT 3801 HARNEY STREET OMAHA, NEBRASKA 68132

Asbestos Survey Proposed Roosevelt Development Roosevelt Way NE Seattle, King County, Washington

ASBESTOS INSPECTION AND ASSESSMENT

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

ASBESTOS REINSPECTION SURVEY REPORT GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION AUBURN ADMINISTRATION BUILDING BUILDING WA0811KA AUBURN, WASHINGTON

Hazardous Materials G

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT: Building No. 1 Windsor Hall

Asbestos/Lead Paint Survey

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY 697 Cook Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota. Prepared for:

HOMOGENEOUS AREAS LIST Asbestos

If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation.

ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT 61, 76 Dumont Avenue South Burlington, VT AIP 74. December 16, 2011 Revised January 31, 2012

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY

November 12, Mr. Derek Sandgren Helm Properties 1520 Butte House Road, Suite 400 Yuba City, California

LIMITED ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT

Office of Design & Construction State University Plaza Albany, New York

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Asbestos and Limited Lead Survey Report

Tim Nelson, Facilities Management's Asbestos Coordinator, 400 Donhowe Building Dan Allen, Associate Director, Recreation Sports, 108 Cooke Hall

Chicago Public Schools 6 Month Asbestos Surveillance Fall

If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation.

LIMITED POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS MATERIAL BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT AND ASBESTOS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT. for

Asbestos Identification Survey for the Former Prime Tanning Facility Located in Berwick, Maine.

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

TRUCKEE HIGH SCHOOL POOL RENOVATIONS TAHOE TRUCKEE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

ASBESTOS INSPECTION FOR LASALLE ROAD MONTROSE, CO

Effective 9/1/2018 all construction and demolition loads will need to be accompanied by a Construction and Demolition Acceptance Form.

Dale Livingston, Asbestos Group, Environmental Health and Safety, 153 U-Tech Building, 2331 University Avenue S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55414

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Investigation Remediation Citation Drive, Suite 100 Compliance Restoration Brighton, MI 48116

Tim Nelson, Facilities Management's Asbestos Coordinator, 400 Donhowe Building Ben Ystenes, Manager, Zone 5, Facilities Management, 19 Scott Hall

Limited Asbestos Demolition Survey

If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation.

EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF UNIVERSITY PROCUREMENT RICHMOND, KENTUCKY. Abatement and Demolition of Various Houses EKU 54-19

Asbestos. Asbestos is a naturally occurring fibrous mineral that is mined from the earth and

Asbestos Elevator Industry Workshop November 25, 2015

Asbestos Survey 415 South St. Crestline, OH 44827

Perspectives Charter School - IIT Math and Science Academy

A trained attendant will meet with you to assess your load and help you through this process.

SanAir Technologies Laboratory. Analysis Report. Rockbridge Environmental Consulting, Inc.

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

HERRON Enterprises USA, Inc.

If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation.

1.0 Executive Summary

ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT Curtis House Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John s, NL

ROY CONSULTING GROUP CORPORATION 9823 Balmoral Circle Charlotte, North Carolina Phone: Fax:

Whitney Young Magnet High School

Pre-Demolition Hazardous Building Materials Survey

1116 Willow Pass Court DESTRUCTIVE TESTING Concord, CA SFUSD PROJECT NO SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

ASBESTOS SURVEY WARNER ROBINS HOUSING AUTHORITY PROJECT SITE GA06P WARNER ROBINS, GEORGIA. December 28, 2005

ASBESTOS SURVEY. Old Detective s Building Wadesboro, NC INSPECTED &PREPARED BY:

POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT. for

If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation.

for Palm Tree Lodge Motel West Mission Avenue Escondido, California Apex Project Number: 3616-A December 20, 2016 Prepared for:

Asbestos Survey Report

If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation.

HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIALS SURVEY

Noble Street Charter - UIC College Prep

Assessment Completed by: Asbestos Inspections, LLC 4686 Pee Dee Highway Conway, South Carolina (843)

February 13, Derrick Willis Northgate Environmental Management, Inc Ridge Route Drive, Suite 130 Laguna Hills, CA 92653

ASBESTOS-RELATED DOCUMENT REVIEW of Eight Properties For City of San Leandro

If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation.

SURVEY FINDINGS Building: 1101

ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY 732 Jessamine Avenue East St. Paul, Minnesota. Prepared for:

SCHOOL DISTRICT Telephone: (770) " One Team, One Goal: Student Success

Chicago Public Schools 6 Month Asbestos Surveillance Fall

Asbestos Consulting Radon Measurements Lead Assessments Indoor Air Quality Testing Mold Investigations. Project Number: Page 1 of 22

SCHOOL DISTRICT Telephone: (770) One Team, One Goal: Student Success

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

NORWELL PUBLIC LIBRARY 64 South St, Norwell, MA 02061

Chicago Technology Academy High School (Medill ES)

ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT. Kroger Store D-578 Expansion 850 South Monroe Street Monroe, Michigan

Asbestos Survey. Ute Highway Water Treatment Plant Boulder County, Colorado. City of Longmont Longmont, Colorado

PROJECT NO REPORT TO CITY OF STRATFORD ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS SURVEY ROW HOUSES STRATFORD, ONTARIO CONDUCTED BY:

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

ASBESTOS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT. for. Michigan State University Office of Environmental and Occupational Safety East Lansing, Michigan 48823

Asbestos Inventory and Condition Assessment

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

ASBESTOS & LEAD PAINT SURVEY

Asbestos Inventory and Condition Assessment

Enclosed please find the inspection report for the above-referenced location.

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Asbestos Inventory and Condition Assessment

POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT. for. SSOE, Inc Wilshire Drive Suite 260 Troy, Michigan 48084

Learn Charter School Excel Campus

ADDENDA NO. 1 Park View Care Facility Asbestos Abatement and Demolition Burlington, Iowa PROJECT No May 30, NOTICE Page 1 of 1

Pre-Renovation Hazardous Building Materials Inspection Report. Ramsey County. Residential Building 2070 Manitou Avenue St.

Transcription:

NARRATIVE REPORT 1.0 BUILDING INFORMATION Putnam Hall was originally constructed in 1905; there appears to have been several renovations, notably, a 1982 renovation throughout the basement and a 1983 renovation throughout the 1 st and 2 nd floors. Putnam Hall is a three-story, 10,015 ft 2 building which primarily serves as office and classroom areas. The interior floor finishes included carpet, ceramic tile, concrete, wood, and floor tile; the interior wall finishes included plaster, gypsum wallboard, wood, and ceramic tile; and the interior ceiling finishes included ceiling tile, plaster, and gypsum wallboard. The roofing system is a peaked wood shingled roof and the exterior of the structure is brick. The piping systems were insulated; fiberglass insulation (without hard fittings) and neoprene insulation are located in the building. Steam and domestic water enter the building via a tunnel into room 1. HVAC systems located in the building consisted of steam radiators and a forced air furnace with heating/cooling coils. 2.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY INFORMATION Putnam Hall was surveyed as part of a larger project on NDSU s Fargo, ND Campus. This report is part of Volume 2 of a nine volume series. This report includes building specific information only; please refer to the opening section of Volume 2 for methodologies, definitions, and other pertinent supporting information. A total of 62 samples were collected from suspect asbestos-containing materials () from Putnam Hall on June 22, 2007 and an additional 4 samples were collected on December 13, 2007. Laboratory analysis results indicate 17 of these samples tested positive for asbestos. 2.1 Suspect Materials Identified and Sampled Joint Compound Floor Filler Hard Plaster- Monocoat (2 types) Hard Plaster- Basecoat Carpet Sink Undercoating Glue Puck (for 12 ceiling Floor Tile Exterior Window Caulk Exterior Building Seam Caulk Exterior Cement Roof Flashing Roof Tarpaper Gypsum Wallboard (2 types) Felt Adhesive (residual) Hard Plaster- Skimcoat Baseboard Adhesive (2 types) Window Glazing Encapsulant on Fiberglass Insulation Ceiling Tile (2 types) Floor Tile Flooring Felt Exterior Penetration Putty Exterior Foundation Caulk Stair Tread Adhesive Roof Tar (2 types) Exterior Window Glazing (4 types) The Asbestos Bulk Sample Results Table includes asbestos sampling data. LEGEND No. 0700048 PUTNAM HALL (A011) Page 1 of 3

2.2 Asbestos Containing Materials 9 Floor Tile and (assumed) Hard Plaster- Monocoat (2 types) Hard Plaster- Skimcoat Hard Plaster- Basecoat Gray Sink Undercoating Roof Flashing Roof Tar (1 type) Exterior Window Glazing (2 types) The Locations/ Friable Materials Assessments Table includes locations data. 2.3 Cost Estimates Legend Technical Services Inc. estimates abatement costs (removal & disposal) of for Putnam Hall as follows: UNIT COST TOTAL COST Asbestos Floor Tile and 1,516 ft 2 $4.00/ ft 2 $6,064.00 Asbestos Hard Plaster 3,965 ft 2 $5.00/ ft 2 $19,825.00 Asbestos Sink Undercoating 1 ea $150.00/ ea $150.00 Asbestos 2,218 ft 2 $5.00/ ft 2 $11,090.00 Asbestos Window Glazing 7 ea $225.00/ ea $1,575.00 Asbestos Roof Flashing 16 ea * * Asbestos Roof Tar 4,148 ft 2 * * Total Estimated Abatement Costs: $38,704.00 *The roof tar and roof flashing on Putnam Hall have been installed directly over the roof wood panels. The material may not be abatable; the roof tar and roof flashing may have to be abated by removing the roof wood panels (component removal). LEGEND cannot accurately estimate to costs associated with this type of roof abatement. If the roof is to be impacted by future renovations, an asbestos abatement contractor and a roofing contractor should be consulted at that time. 2.4 Survey Notes The wall hard plaster in Putnam Hall was quantified using a combination of visual verification and a review of architectural drawings. Several areas were identified on the architectural drawings as having residual wall hard plaster that was not removed during previous renovation projects and that could not be visually verified due to new wall systems (potentially concealing the wall hard plaster). In these areas, LEGEND quantified the wall hard plaster based off of the architectural drawings. These areas are identified on the Locations/ Friable Materials Assessments Table in the notes column by way of referencing the architectural drawings. Also of note, the architectural drawings indicated that wall hard plaster had been left on all exterior walls in the basement. LEGEND s visually verification of these areas indicated the wall hard plaster had been removed, studs were added against the exterior walls, gypsum wallboard was installed, and the new wall cavities were filled with expandable insulation. However, the potential exists that the exterior walls may still have wall hard plaster under the expandable insulation. LEGEND recommends assuming the wall hard plaster is present until a destructive LEGEND No. 0700048 PUTNAM HALL (A011) Page 2 of 3

survey can be conducted for final visual verification. approximately 2,580 ft 2. The exterior wall surface area is The 9 floor tile and mastic identified under the carpet on the 1 st floor was quantified by pulling the carpet back in several corners in each room and visually inspecting for its presence. However, during previous renovation projects a floor filler material was used extensively throughout the 1 st floor; this material interfered with LEGEND s inspection. In addition, the 9 floor tile and mastic appears to follow a previous floor plan for the building prior to the 1983 renovations adding to the difficulties of visual verification. LEGEND recommends assuming all of 1 st floor to have 9 floor tile and mastic below the current flooring systems until a destructive survey can be conducted for final visual verification. The remaining surface area of 1 st floor is approximately 2,000 ft 2. The white paper layer identified above the 2 x4 ceiling tile on 1 st floor appears to follow a previous floor plan for the building prior to the 1983 renovations. This is indicated on the architectural drawings available for Putnam Hall and by visual verification of the material crossing part way through a few of the current rooms, following the lines where previous walls would have been. Using this information LEGEND recommends assuming that the north end of hallway 188 has this white paper layer above its current gypsum wallboard ceiling until a destructive survey can be conducted for final visual verification. The surface area the north end hallway 188 is approximately 270 ft 2. LEGEND No. 0700048 PUTNAM HALL (A011) Page 3 of 3

LOCATIONS/FRIABLE S ASSESSMENTS TABLE Room 5 Hard Plaster (wall) 2-10% Chrysotile 125 ft 2 Non-Friable west wall, it has a layer of gypsum wallboard over it. Room 9 Hard Plaster (wall) 2-10% Chrysotile 55 ft 2 Non-Friable N/A* N/A* N/A* The wall hard plaster was visually verified on a small section of the north wall, it has a layer of gypsum wallboard over it. Room 12 Hard Plaster (wall) 2-10% Chrysotile 30 ft 2 Non-Friable Hard Plaster (ceiling) 2% Chrysotile 17 ft 2 Friable west wall, it has a layer of gypsum wallboard over it. 2 The ceiling hard plaster was visually verified, it is above the ceiling tile. Room 13 Hard Plaster (wall) 2-10% Chrysotile 55 ft 2 Non-Friable N/A* N/A* N/A* The wall hard plaster was visually verified on a small section of the north wall, it has a layer of gypsum wallboard over it. Room 19 Hard Plaster (wall) 2-10% Chrysotile 125 ft 2 Non-Friable east wall, it has a layer of gypsum wallboard over it. Hallway 88 Hard Plaster (wall) 2-10% Chrysotile 320 ft 2 Non-Friable N/A* N/A* N/A* The wall hard plaster was visually verified by rooms 5, 19, and 88A, it has a layer of gypsum wallboard over it. * = Non-Friable materials were not assessed Page 1 of 6

LOCATIONS/FRIABLE S ASSESSMENTS TABLE Hard Plaster (ceiling) 2% Chrysotile 188 ft 2 Friable 2 The ceiling hard plaster was visually verified, it is above the ceiling tile by rooms 99M and 99W. Stairway 88A Hard Plaster (wall) 2-10% Chrysotile 416 ft 2 Non-Friable Hard Plaster (ceiling) 2% Chrysotile 130 ft 2 Non-Friable renovation indicated the wall plaster was left in this area. renovation indicated the ceiling plaster was left in this area. Room 99M Hard Plaster (wall) 2-10% Chrysotile 160 ft 2 Non-Friable Hard Plaster (ceiling) 2% Chrysotile 108 ft 2 Friable renovation indicated the wall plaster was left on the east wall. 2 The ceiling hard plaster was visually verified, it is above the ceiling tile. Room 99W Hard Plaster (wall) 2-10% Chrysotile 160 ft 2 Non-Friable Hard Plaster (ceiling) 2% Chrysotile 108 ft 2 Friable renovation indicated the wall plaster was left on the west wall. 2 The ceiling hard plaster was visually verified, it is above the ceiling tile. Room 101 Now Room 102 Suite (102, 102A-D) Hard Plaster (wall) 2-10% Chrysotile 330 ft 2 Non-Friable west wall, it has a layer of gypsum wallboard over it. This is in 102 & 102A * = Non-Friable materials were not assessed Page 2 of 6

LOCATIONS/FRIABLE S ASSESSMENTS TABLE 50% Chrysotile 740 ft 2 Friable 9 Floor Tile and Assumed 100 ft 2 Non-Friable Abated March 2014 N/A* N/A* N/A* The 9 floor tile and mastic (under carpet) was identified around the entry door on the west wall. (see note in narrative Room 102 Now Room 104 50% Chrysotile 96 ft 2 Friable Room 102A Abated March 2014 9 Floor Tile and Assumed 108 ft 2 Non-Friable Room 102B Now Room 104 50% Chrysotile 80 ft 2 Friable 9 Floor Tile and Assumed 80 ft 2 Non-Friable Abated March 2014 Room 102C Now Room 104B 50% Chrysotile 100 ft 2 Friable 9 Floor Tile and Assumed 100 ft 2 Non-Friable Abated March 2014 * = Non-Friable materials were not assessed Page 3 of 6

LOCATIONS/FRIABLE S ASSESSMENTS TABLE Room 102D 50% Chrysotile 105 ft 2 Friable 9 Floor Tile and Assumed 105 ft 2 Non-Friable Abated March 2014 Room 104 Gray Sink Undercoating Now Room 104C Now Room 106 50% Chrysotile 55 ft 2 Friable 5% Chrysotile 1 sink Non-Friable N/A* N/A* N/A* There is only sink in the room, it is along the east wall that borders room 103. Room 105 Now Room 106 Hard Plaster (wall) 2-10% Chrysotile 120 ft 2 Non-Friable 50% Chrysotile 725 ft 2 Friable 9 Floor Tile and Assumed 725 ft 2 Non-Friable Abated December 2013 east wall bordering hallway 188, it has a layer of gypsum wallboard over it. Room 105A Now Room 106B 50% Chrysotile 168 ft 2 Friable * = Non-Friable materials were not assessed Page 4 of 6

LOCATIONS/FRIABLE S ASSESSMENTS TABLE Room 105B Now Room 106A Hard Plaster (wall) 2-10% Chrysotile 180 ft 2 Non-Friable 50% Chrysotile 144 ft 2 Friable east wall, it has a layer of gypsum wallboard over it. Room 105C Now Room 106D 50% Chrysotile 45 ft 2 Friable Room 105D Now Room 106C 50% Chrysotile 128 ft 2 Friable 9 Floor Tile and Assumed 128 ft 2 Non-Friable Abated December 2013 Hallway 188 Hard Plaster (wall) 2-10% Chrysotile 315 ft 2 Non-Friable 9 Floor Tile and Assumed 270 ft 2 Non-Friable Abated May 2015 renovation indicated the wall plaster was left on the northeast and northwest walls. * = Non-Friable materials were not assessed Page 5 of 6

LOCATIONS/FRIABLE S ASSESSMENTS TABLE Stairway 188A Hard Plaster (wall) 2-10% Chrysotile 900 ft 2 Non-Friable Stairway to 2 nd Floor (by room 105) now by 106 Hard Plaster (wall) 2-10% Chrysotile 270 ft 2 Non-Friable renovation indicated the wall plaster was left in this area. N/A* N/A* N/A* The wall hard plaster was visually verified in this area. Exterior Window Glazing 3-5% Chrysotile 7 windows Non-Friable N/A* N/A* N/A* The asbestos window glazing is on the 5 windows around the south entry door and the 2 windows to the sides of the north entry doors. Roof Flashing 15% Chrysotile 16 ea Non-Friable Tar Layer 15% Chrysotile 4,148 ft 2 Non-Friable N/A* N/A* N/A* The flashing was observed around the base of 16 air vents on the roof. N/A* N/A* N/A* The roof construction is wood shakes over tar paper with a tar layer below that. This bottom tar layer contains asbestos. 1 Assessment Categories: 1) or Significantly TSI 5) with Potential for Damage 2) Friable 6) with Potential for Significant Damage 3) Significantly Friable 7) Any Remaining Friable or Friable Suspected 4) or Significantly Friable End * = Non-Friable materials were not assessed Page 6 of 6