FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 7, ATK Contact: Media Relations

Similar documents
Texas Transportation Forum The Fast Track: Passenger Rail In Texas. Federal Railroad Administration Karen Rae, Deputy Administrator

1.1 Environmental Assessment/Environmental Impact Evaluation for the New Haven, Hartford and Springfield High-Speed Intercity Rail Project

LONG BRIDGE CAPACITY NEEDS. Oscar J. Gonzalez Virginia Railway Express Project Manager Alexandria, VA

ITEM #11: PHASE 2B SUPPLEMENT HAMPTON ROADS PASSENGER RAIL STUDY: SCOPE OF WORK

Strategic Long-Term High-Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail Plan: Phase 2 Study Approach

Report to Congress December 2017

Stockton Freight & Passenger Rail Mobility Enhancement

ARIZONA STATE RAIL PLAN

1. Evaluation of route and service alternatives; 2. Tier 1 Environmental Impact Analysis; and 3. Service Development Plan.

Village Manager s Office

HAMPTON ROADS PASSENGER RAIL STUDY DATA COLLECTION PHASE 2A NORFOLK-RICHMOND CORRIDOR

Rail Enterprise Presentation

Twin Cities-Milwaukee-Chicago Intercity Passenger Rail Phase I Study Twin Cities- Milwaukee High Speed Rail to Chicago Corridor Study

AGENDA ITEM #8: HAMPTON ROADS PASSENGER RAIL STUDY HIGH SPEED RAIL SERVICE ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS: PHASE 2B DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR HOUSTON DALLAS HIGH SPEED RAIL (TEXAS CENTRAL)

2017 TRANSPORTATION POLICY STATEMENT

Massachusetts Rail Plan. September 16, 2010

CUSTOMER FOCUS AT AMTRAK

STUDY OVERVIEW. Federal Railroad Administration Southeast Regional Rail Planning Study. Stakeholder Group Workshop 1 Columbia, South Carolina

E2 D0 U 1 C 3 A E T D IUOCNA A T IL O S N E A R L I E S S E R I E S HUB/DBE/SBE R A I L

Ohio & Lake Erie Regional Rail - The Ohio Hub. Executive Summary

1.0 INTRODUCTION Federal Mandate for State Rail Plans Stakeholder Consultation Ongoing Planning Process...

Project Overview. A Collaborative Effort

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #1. The Vision, Goals and Objectives for Rail Transportation in Missouri

Northeast Rail Operations Study (NEROps)

Long Bridge Project. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Revised Purpose and Need

Baltimore & Potomac Tunnel Project.

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Amendment #1

Section IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. 7. Implementation Plan

Ohio 21 st Century Transportation System It s Ours to Create!

Preapplication for HSIPR Program OMB No

2010 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan. Minnesota Department of Transportation

Developing New Revenue Streams For Transit

Environmental Impact Statement for the Baltimore-Washington Superconducting Maglev (SCMAGLEV) Project, between Baltimore, Maryland and Washington, DC

Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan

Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization. Hampton Roads Passenger Rail Study Data Collection. Phase 2A. Presentation To.

2004 FEASIBILITY STUDY UPDATE

The Ohio & Lake Erie Regional Rail Ohio Hub Study

William W. Hay Railroad Engineering Seminar

Presentation To: HRTPO Passenger Rail Task Force

Preapplication for HSIPR Program OMB No

Long Bridge Project. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Revised Purpose and Need

NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BOARD

Rail Division 2012 Annual Summary

Corridor Planning Organizations and Ports I-95 Corridor: A Marine Highway Corridor

Ohio s Passenger Rail Plan Investing in Ohio s Economic Future Northwest Ohio Passenger Rail Association June 11, 2010

ESTIMATING MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR MIXED HIGHER SPEED PASSENGER AND FREIGHT RAIL CORRIDORS

1 In the version of the spreadsheet model that we received, column headings are missing and formulas have evidently

Testimony of: Michael Nicholas. President. Rockford Area Economic Development Council. Presented to: Illinois Senate Transportation Committee.

VDOT and DRPT MPO and PDC Winter Meeting Amy Inman Planning & Mobility Programs Administrator Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation

9.0 Meeting the Challenges

Regional Performance Measures Annual Progress Report TPO Board - 2/4/2016 Presentation by: Chris Wichman, Senior Planner

Transportation Committee DRPT Presentation

Ron O Blenis, PE Senior Rail Project Manager (617)

Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement for the Chicago, Illinois, to Detroit-Pontiac,

Pacific Northwest High Speed Rail Corridor Amtrak Cascades Passenger Service Update

NEW JERSEY STATE RAIL PLAN NJ TRANSIT New Jersey Department of Transportation

Orange County Transit

There are three main operational challenges we need to address. We need to:

The Future of Transit in Colorado

Northeast Rail Operations Study (NEROps)

Appendix D Presentation Slides with Script

The Challenges of Improving High Speed Rail in Pennsylvania:

WESTERN HIGH-SPEED RAIL ALLIANCE THE WESTERN CONNECTION

Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study. Welcome to the scoping open house!

State of Idaho Profile

Rail Division. Riding the Rails

Assessment of Current Status, Plans, and Preliminary Alternatives for High Capacity Transportation in the I-5 Corridor

NORTH I-75 MASTER PLAN Summary Report

PLEASE NOTE. NATS MPO Suzann Flowers x 17 TwinCATS MPO Gautam Mani (269) x24

Q. What is NWP Co. and what is its relationship to NCRA and the railroad asset?

Mental Health Awareness & Trespass Prevention Strategies

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment North-South Corridor

Preapplication for HSIPR Program OMB No

Connectivity North and Beyond Nevada s I 80 Corridor

GULF COAST RAIL DISTRICT VISION FOR REGIONAL RAIL

National. Rail Plan. Moving Forward

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD. APTA Legal Affairs Conference STB s Passenger Rail Responsibilities. February 24, 2014

TRANSPORTATION Are We There Yet? Achieving the Vision rail. I n t e r c i t y. passengerrail

Freight and Rail Stakeholder Webinar. January 7, 2014

TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY. TPP Planning Conference 2014

ARIZONA STATE RAIL PLAN. ITE / IMSA 2011 Spring Conference March 9 th 2011

Texas A&M Transportation Short Course

Corridors of Statewide Significance: Introduction

MPO/RPO Briefings. MPO/RPO Briefing. Briefing Topics Plan framework o NCDOT Policy to Projects process o Relationship to local/regional plans

Richard Clarke Executive Director Program Management. Capital Program Management

Creating Safe, Sustainable, Multi-Modal Urban Transportation

State Strategies to Reduce Traffic Congestion. National Conference of State Legislatures November, 2007

2. Goals and Objectives

2015 FAST Act Rail-related Provisions

NORTHERN VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

North I-75 Master Plan Summary

2010 Indiana Logistics Summit

PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION

Introduction. Performance Measurement. Pg. 01

Executive Summary. Building our Economy

2010 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan

Freight Trends: Moving Goods in the 21 st Century

Multi-State Planning Proposal

An Evidence-Based Approach for the Planning and Development of Transportation Investments

Transcription:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 7, 2010 ATK-10-080 Contact: Media Relations 202 906.3860 NATIONAL RAIL PLAN NEEDS TO RECOGNIZE THE VALUE OF AMTRAK S INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL NETWORK Serves as foundation to expand high-speed and conventional rail services WASHINGTON Amtrak is urging the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) to be bold and unambiguous in its vision for the future of the national rail system, including the Amtrak network, as it develops a long-range National Rail Plan (NRP). Amtrak s existing national intercity passenger rail system should be recognized in the NRP as the foundation for the development of an expanded network of high-speed and conventional rail services spanning key corridors across the United States, said Amtrak Vice President, Policy and Development Stephen Gardner. Gardner explained that Amtrak is America s intercity passenger railroad and the only high-speed rail service provider in North America. In addition, Amtrak s current network of high-speed services in the Northeast Corridor, short-distance corridor services run in partnership with the states, and overnight long-distance services spanning the nation, is a solid base on which to build a truly 21 st Century national intercity passenger rail system. The NRP should lay out a clear national vision for this network and contain strategies for improving and expanding intercity passenger rail services where such service can advance key national priorities like congestion relief, transportation safety, energy-efficiency, environmental protection, and sustainable development, he stated. In written comments submitted to the FRA, Amtrak said that as a company chartered by the federal government, and overseen by the U.S. Department of Transportation, the final NRP should address the Department s views on Amtrak, its future and its role in delivering the type of modern and efficient intercity passenger rail service envisioned in the preliminary NRP. Amtrak also believes that the NRP should establish clear federal performance goals for each segment of the passenger and freight rail system, and should link those goals to strategic -more-

ATK-10-080 national outcomes. Furthermore, the NRP needs to develop specific targets and milestones for system development and performance that can be used to measure national progress. When addressing the goal of developing high-speed passenger rail, for instance, Amtrak is recommending a specific target be set to connect all pairs of metropolitan areas with populations of one million or more, and separated by less than 600 miles, with frequent, reliable, high-speed intercity passenger rail service. In addition, Amtrak said that matching intercity rail development plans to appropriate markets must be a key aspect of the NRP, noting that in a nation as big as the United States, not all travel markets will require the same levels of service. In some cases, high-speed, veryfrequent rail service may be necessary to create a viable alternative to existing travel options, while conventional intercity service may be more appropriate for other corridors where the market may be smaller. Amtrak also stressed that in order for intercity passenger rail to become a viable travel alternative to the nation s highway and aviation systems, the NRP must recognize that intercity passenger rail service needs to be both accessible and well-connected to final destinations through local transit options and that developed corridors will need to be connected into a coherent national network. Finally, Amtrak noted that federal intercity passenger rail development funding is essential to sustaining and improving the current network and that the best strategy to fund highspeed and intercity passenger rail investment is one that establishes a dedicated source of reliable, predictable, and multi-year funds to support capital grants to both Amtrak and states. Amtrak recently participated in a series of public meetings hosted by FRA on the NRP. A copy of Amtrak s written comments submitted to FRA is attached. About Amtrak As the nation s intercity passenger rail operator, Amtrak connects America in safer, greener and healthier ways. Last fiscal year (FY 2009), the railroad carried 27.2 million passengers, making it the second-best year in the company s history. With 21,000 route miles in 46 states, the District of Columbia and three Canadian provinces, Amtrak operates more than 300 trains each day at speeds up to 150 mph (241 kph) to more than 500 destinations. Amtrak also is the partner of choice for state-supported corridor services in 15 states and for several commuter rail agencies. Visit Amtrak.com or call 800-USA-RAIL for schedules, fares and more information. # # #