Crop Availability of Sulphur From Elemental-S. Kent Martin, Ph.D. Alberta Update

Similar documents
For nmental. of 10. Written By: Agustin o, Professor. Developed in. and justice for all. Department of. funded by activities. )

Sulphur Fertilization: What Has Changed?

2/20/2013. Sulfur and Sulfuric Acid. Sulfur: Production and Use in North America and the World. Sulfur Production Types. Elemental Sulfur Production

Challenges of Soil Nutrient Management

Sulfur Use in Western MN, What We Know and What We Don t

Phosphorus and Sulphur Management for Canola Production

Chapter 2.3. Manure and Fertilizer as Sources of Nutrients and Potential Environmental Hazards. learning objectives

Fertilizer and Nutrient Management of Timothy Hay

Best management for N & S in canola and wheat. Rob Norton

G Fertilizing Winter Wheat I: Nitrogen, Potassium, and Micronutrients

Sulphur Fertilizer Application in Crop Production

Fertilizing High Producing Alfalfa Stands

Fertility Research Updates. Frank Yin Department of Plant Sciences University of Tennessee

Influence of formulation of elemental S fertilizer on yield, quality and S uptake of canola seed

Soil Test Laboratory Analysis and Fertilizer Recommendations

The Enigma of Soil Nitrogen George Rehm, University of Minnesota

Fertility and Crop Nutrition. B. Linquist, R. Mutters, J. Hill and C. vankessel Rice Production Workshop, March 21, 2011

SULFUR AND TENNESSEE ROW CROPS

Drought Implications for Nutrient Management. Charles Wortmann

Cycling and Biogeochemical Transformations of N, P and S

Cycling and Biogeochemical Transformations of N, P and S

Principles Of Fertigation In Micro Irrigation

Cycling and Biogeochemical Transformations of N, P, S, and K

Sulphur Fertilizer Application in Crop Production

Lecture 18. Soil Acidity, Alkalinity, and Socidity

Calcium Thiosulfate S-6Ca LIQUID FERTILIZER. Gypsum Field Study

Soil Testing and Nutrient Management. Craig Cogger Soil Scientist WSU Puyallup

Potential Uses for Agrotain and Polymer Coated Products

Cycling and Biogeochemical Transformations of N, P, S, and K

A Review of the Agronomics Related to the Use of Polyhalite as a Major Fertilizer Product in World Agriculture

Managing Soils for Improved Pasture

EXAMPLE QUESTIONS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION EXAM

Subject Index. See for options on how to legitimately share published articles.

Sulphur-enhanced triple superphosphate as a substitute for single superphosphate

Soil Testing for Nutrient Management on Vegetable Farms. Becky Maden February 2018

Soil Fertility and Forage Availability. Travis Harper Agronomy Specialist University of Missouri Extension

Developing Effective Plant Nutrition Programs for North Coast Vineyards

Nutrient Removal by Crops

Optimizing Fertilizer Applications on Sugar Beet. Jay Norton Soil Fertility Specialist University of Wyoming

What is ph Soil ph Sources of soil acidity Managing soil ph Lime sources and use

Nutrient Cycling in Soils

Nitrogen A pop quiz!!! John Lamb SMBSC Grower Seminar Willmar, MN January 24, 2018

Nutrient Management in Organic Production

Sulfur Fertilization for Iowa Crop Production. John Sawyer Professor Soil Fertility Extension Specialist Department of Agronomy Iowa State University

Sulphur Fertilization: What has Changed?

Cycling and Biogeochemical Transformations of N, P, S, and K

Understanding Salt Index of Fertilizers. Carrie Laboski Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-Madison

FERTILIZER AND FERTILIZATION LECTURE 3

Soil Fertility and Fertilizers - Timing and Management Crop Opportunity Update North Battleford, SK March 6, 2014

A M E R O P A. Fertilizers. presentation for ASBA Cargo Conference in Miami FL. 28 Sept 2017

Keeping the Grass Greener on Your Side of the Fence Understanding Pasture Fertility

Enhancing water and nutrient use efficiency: The key to transforming agriculture and meeting future food demand.

Cycling and Biogeochemical Transformations of N, P, S, and K

Sulfur: At the Crossroads of Energy, the Environment, and Agriculture

Clain Jones

Increasing Importance of Sulfur for Field Crops

Nutrient Cycling in Soils: The Big 3 and Carbon

Managing Nitrogen for Yield and Protein in Winter Wheat

Multi- Nutrient Variable Application. Much like a Ladder. One Step at a Time. In-Season Cues Secondary & Micros N & S P & K.

November Tile Pays on Rented Ground Also!

The Nitrate Soil Test: Is it Reliable? 3. Don Flaten, Dept. of Soil Science Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Manitoba

Nutrient Cycling & Soils

Guidelines for Safe Rates of Fertilizer Placed with the Seed

5. NITROGEN (N)-The Big Guy

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nutrient Management in Field Crops MSU Fertilizer Recommendations Crop*A*Syst 2015 Nutrient Management Training

Introduction. Alfalfa Response to Sulfur Fertilization. Trials in 2005

The Management of Soil Nutrients: Chemical Fertilisers or Not?

Keywords: Phosphorus, sulphur, seed-placed fertilizer, canola (Brassica napus), plant stand, seed yield

Evaluation of Fertilizer Additives for Enhanced Nitrogen Efficiency in Corn. Final Project Report (2013 and 2014)

Institute of Ag Professionals

Wood Ash - An Alternative Liming Material for Agricultural Soils

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT WHAT S DOABLE. John E. Sawyer Associate Professor Soil Fertility Extension Specialist Department of Agronomy Iowa State University

Subsection 3D: Nutrient Recommendations Forage Crops

Cycling and Biogeochemical Transformations of N, P, S, and K

Nitrogen Fertilization of Corn

Monitoring carbon budgets

Seed Banding Fertilizer What are the Limits?

Determining nutrient needs

extension.missouri.edu Archive version -- See Using Your Soil Test Results

Balanced nutrition in Brassica napus production with emphasis on S fertilizer requirements

Seeding Rates of Canola

S. S. Malhi*, S. A. Brandt*, C. L. Vera** and D. Leach**

MSU Extension Publication Archive. Scroll down to view the publication.

OVERCOMING SOIL ACIDITY CONSTRAINTS THROUGH

Soil Testing for Soil Health. Rick Haney PhD, USDA ARS, Temple, TX

Enhanced Fertilizer Efficiency - Fertilizer Products - Saskatoon, CANADA

ARE ALL fertilizers the same? Of

After application, nitrogen sources in the ammonium form (NH 4+ ) rapidly convert to the nitrate form (NO 3. - ) via a process called nitrification.

Nutrient Sources, are not all Equal. John Lauzon

ph Management and Lime Material Selection and Application

Pulse Crop Fertilizer Needs July 11, 2013 NE MT Pulse Crop Tour, Richland

Discuss the importance of healthy soils Soil properties, physical, chemical and biological that one can manage for soil health How organics play a

Update on Sulfur Response in Iowa Field Crop Production

Nutrient Management for Hay Production and Quality

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. philosophy/approach for determining N rate guidelines for corn.

Ammonia-based Fertilizer Markets Are Fertilizers Petrochemicals too?

ROTOFORM-----PASTILLATION FOR----SULPHUR BENTONITE

Technology 8: Extent of micro- and secondary nutrient deficiencies in Indian soils and their correction

Transcription:

Crop Availability of Sulphur From Elemental-S Kent Martin, Ph.D. Alberta Update

Background Sulphur is taken up by plants as SO 4 = Mobile in the soil, immobile in the plant Fertilizer recommendations tied to yield goals Due to mobility in soil and activity in the plants www.agric.wa.gov.au Deep soil sampling increases accuracy and predicted crop response Deficiency typically seen with coarse soil texture, low S testing soil, low organic matter, or eroded areas In crops with high demand alfalfa, canola, corn

Survey Survey conducted to Researchers, University, and Consultants 100% of respondents recognized the need for S and that farmers focus on S is increasing Perceived need for Sulfate 73% Perceived need for ES 27% What are the drivers? Availability of S to the crop Able to be blended Free of dust and fines Recognized need for high analysis S product that is readily available

Role of S in Plants (Canola) Key nutrient for structural plant parts Part of enzymes Amino acids responsible for protein synthesis Chlorophyll synthesis Rapid crop growth Earlier maturity Yield Protein content Oil content Biochemical Yield Quality

Sulphur Deficiency Symptoms www.cropnutrietion.com www.canolawatch.org www.missouriruralist.com Webapp.agron.ksu.edu

Atmospheric Deposition of S One of the greatest reasons for decrease in S deposition is clean air https://www.ccme.ca/files/resources/air/acid_rain/national_picture_acid_deposition_pn1412.pdf

Atmospheric Deposition of S

Sulphur Sources Soil S Pool: Organic (95%) ------- Inorganic (5%) Balance depends on the balance of immobilization and mineralization Immobilization microbial conversion of inorganic S to organic S (not available to plants) Mineralization Breakdown of organic S into inorganic compounds that results in plant available S S Fertilizer Sulfate Ammonium Sulfate (21-0-0-24) Gypsum (CaSO 4, 15% S, 19% Ca) Elemental Sulphur Bentonite (0-0-0-90) Co-granulated S Fertilizer Source Formula Analysis Ammonium Sulfate (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 21-0-0-24 Ammonium Thiosulfate (ATS) (NH 4 ) 2 S 2 O 3 12-0-0-26 Gypsum CaSO 4 2H 2 O 0-0-0.5-17 Epsom Salt MgSO 4 7H 2 O 0-0-0-14 Potassium Magnesium Sulfate K 4 SO 4 2MgSO 4 0-0-22-23 Potassium Sulfate K 4 SO 4 0-0-50-18 Elemental S S + Bentonite 0-0-0-90 Co-granulated Elemental S S + Co-granulated Product variable

Advantages and Disadvantages Advantages Immediately Available Fast Concentration of Sulfate Water Soluble Advantages Sustained Release Less Risk of Loss by Leaching Can Build Soil S Levels Sulfate Elemental S Disadvantages Leachable Only Takes One Large Rainfall for Loss Water Soluble Disadvantages Slower to Become Available Not Able to Immediately Correct Deficiency Need to Understand Products

Microbial Oxidation of Elemental S Elemental S must be oxidized to be available to plants S 0 + O 2 + H 2 O Microbes H 2 SO 3 + ½ O 2 H 2 SO 4 Thiobacillius is most recognized microbe involved in S oxidation Others are also important Conditions favorable for microbial growth are favorable for oxidation Adequate temperature Moisture Air

Importance of Particle Size of Elemental S Range in days to reach 50% oxidation from 17 to 210 days Fastest occurs with smaller particle size when it was co-granulated Degryse et al. 2016 Particle Size % S Oxidized (microns) 2 Weeks 4 Weeks > 2,000 1 2 840 2,000 2 5 420 840 5 14 180 420 15 36 125 180 36 68 90 125 61 81 60 80 82 Canola.okstate.edu

Shell Thiogro Technologies Has been in the S fertilizer technology business since 1960 s Technology allows fertilizer producer to incorporate micronized elemental S into existing product streams Phosphate technology developed in mid-2,000 s MAP, DAP, TSP with 4-15% S Currently being commercially produced in India, Australia, and soon in Morocco (by OCP) Urea ES developed 2013 10 30% ES Average particle size less than 40 μm Special S developed 2017 ~ 75% ES Average particle size less than 50 μm

Sulfur Oxidized (lb/ac) Urea-ES Various formulations evaluated Co-granulated urea and sulphur 14 Missouri Corn Sulfate Oxidation at V5 Growth Stage (Soil Sulfate and Plant Sulfur Uptake Included) 12 bc 10 ab 8 ab 6 a 4 2 0 Control S Bentonite AMS Thiogro Urea ES

Yield (kg/ha) Urea-ES 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 Wheatland Conservation Area (Swift Current, SK) Canola Yield Response 2017 a b c bc S Bentonite AMS Urea-ES (13%) 0 Control S Bentonite AMS Urea-ES

Sulfate (ppm) Special-S vs Bentonite Properties SPECIAL-S DISOLUTION/DISPERSION SULPHUR BENTONITE SWELLING/DISPERSION Dispersion mechanism involves urea dissolving in water leaving clusters of sulphur particles which then crumble Timeframe: minutes (3-5) Dispersion mechanism consist of the swelling clay expand, breaking the solid elemental sulphur matrix in small pieces Timeframe: hours (24-48) 40 35 Sulfur Oxidation Tennessee (Control Plot S Removed) Special S AMS S Bentonite 30 25 20 15 10 5 0-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Days After Application

Yield (bu/ac) Special S Iowa Corn Sidedress Yield Trial 2017 250 245 b 240 ab 235 230 ab ab 225 a a 220 215 Urea Plus (13%) Control 210 Control S Bentonite AMS Urea-ES (7%) Urea-ES (14%) Special S

Summary S deficiency is getting more common S is mobile in the soil and immobile in the plant S Sources Sulfate (Readily available, Leaches) Elemental (Must be oxidized, Less prone to loss) New Technologies for Elemental S Small particle size is better Availability is better than traditionally thought Nice mix of availability and minimizing loss risk

Kent Martin, Ph.D. martinagconsulting@gmail.com 580-430-9196

Calcium and Magnesium Calcium Functions in plant growth and structural support for cell walls Deficiency rarely occurs with adequate ph Acid soil < 500 lb/ac deficient for legumes Mobile in soil Most common source is lime, gypsum Magnesium Central in chlorophyll molecule used for photosynthesis Deficiency in coarse sands with low ph Immobile in soil Common sources dolomitic lime, magnesium sulfate, K-Mag amp-realagriculture-com www.epicgardening.com

History The first reported ES use was in South Carolina in 1877 (Charles Panknin) Recommendation: 95 parts bone or ground phosphate with 5 parts elemental S to aid in P availability Knew ES was oxidized to SO 4, but didn t know it was a microbial process 2008 Estimates of global S supplies estimated ~ 5 billion tons Contained in natural gas, oil, metal sulfides, salt domes and volcanic deposits 2008 Production of S worldwide reached 69 million tons Canada (13.5%), US (13%), China (12%), Russia (10%), Japan (4.5%) Of all S consumed in the world, 55% was used in production of fertilizers

S Uptake and Partitioning in Corn