NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT RIVERSIDE SOUTH PHASE 13 CITY OF OTTAWA

Similar documents
NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT RIVERSIDE SOUTH PHASE 9-4 CITY OF OTTAWA

NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY. MINTO COMMUNITIES INC. Clarke Lands CITY OF OTTAWA

Mann Avenue Development 87 Mann Avenue Noise Control Study

NOISE CONTROL STUDY FOR PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND...

Noise Assessment Report

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 12 HAMILTON AVENUE NORTH OTTAWA, ON.

Table of Contents... ii 1. Introduction... 1

Guelph Curling Club Development Traffic Noise Impact Study

DCR Phoenix. Type of Document 1st Submission. Project Name 256 Rideau Street Ottawa, Ontario. Project Number OTT A0. Prepared By: Nicole Ruyf

Noise Assessment Report

Avalon Encore Stage Tenth Line Road Infusion Terrace, Block 233 City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Impact Assessment

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 47 HAVELOCK STREET OTTAWA, ON.

MINTO COMMUNITIES INC GREENBANK ROAD NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY

Prepared for: Gapatas Inc Sherwoodtowne Boulevard, Unit 106 Mississauga, ON L4Z 1Y5. Our File No:

Noise Assessment Report Riverside Drive Phase I

671 Victoria Road North City of Guelph Traffic Noise Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

Noise Feasibility Study EMGO (North Oakville I) Ltd., Town of Oakville, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber House 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario

Fayez & Patrizia Ghadban

Noise Assessment Report Main Street, Residential Site Cambridge, ON

Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 47 HAVELOCK STREET OTTAWA, ON. REVISED with ADDENDUM for ROOFTOP OUTDOOR LIVING AREA

Noise Assessment Report

Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment Chapel Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development, 361 Tanbark Road Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Building 103 Dundas Street West Oakville, Ontario

TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT 20 MARK AVENUE

Merivale Road Residential Development 1683 Merivale Road Noise Control Study

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT MCGANN 9a LANDS BANK STREET LEITRIM DEVELOPMENT AREA

Noise Feasibility Study Stacked Townhouse Development Glenashton Drive (Block 55) Oakville, Ontario

Table of Contents. 174 Forward Avenue SACL Project #B7-170 Feb 22, Page ii

Traffic Noise Assessment Baseline Road Ottawa, Ontario

Traffic Noise Assessment. 5 Orchard Drive. Stittsville, Ontario

UAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Ironwood Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario

NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6

ASSESSMENT OF THE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS AT THE PROPOSED HOLIDAY INN DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE

Noise Control Feasibility Study 173 / 175 / 177 Preston Street Ottawa, Ontario

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 1208 OLD MONTREAL ROAD

Traffic Noise Assessment. 333 Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario

ASSESSMENT OF THE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS AT THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 364 ST. PATRICK STREET

MINTO COMMUNITIES INC. HARMONY STAGE 2 PART OF 4025 STRANDHERD DRIVE NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Brock Road Pickering, Ontario

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT THE MEADOWS IN HALF MOON BAY PHASE 5

Place Vanier Édifice AEFO

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Hospice 2050 University Avenue East, Waterloo, Ontario

Noise Control Study. Proposed Mixed-use Development. 112 Montreal Road City of Ottawa. Prepared for: DCR Phoenix Developments

Noise Control Study. for. Avalon Public School Portobello Boulevard at Stormwind Avenue in Ottawa, Ontario. Revision 1

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT CLARIDGE HOMES MAPLE GROVE LANDS 1981 MAPLE GROVE ROAD KANATA WEST

3.5.1 Outdoor Living Areas (OLAs) Indoor Sound Levels... 8

Brigil Homes. Noise Impact Assessment. Type of Document Site Plan Submission. Project Name Petrie s Landing, Phase 2. Project Number OTT A0

Noise Assessment & Control Transportation Noise Assessment 303 Lebreton Street South, 460 St. Laurent Boulevard Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study, McGibbon Condominium 71 Main Street South Georgetown, Ontario

Appendix K. Environmental Noise Assessment

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

SS WILSON ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers

REP Fotenn Bank Phase 1 Feasibility Noise Study with Building Component AmendmentPage 1 of 21

Environmental Noise Assessment 1020, 1024, 1028, 1032 & 1042 Sixth Line Oakville, ON

DETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY OF PROPOSED PHASE 2 CONDOMINIUMS AT 655 & 755 ANAND PRIVATE OTTAWA Ontario Inc.

18 McArthur Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario Proposed Development Noise Study Report. Prepared for: Takyan Consulting By: ARCH-Nova Design Inc.

Roadway Traffic Noise and Vibration Assessment. The Bridge Wesleyan Church Addition. Ottawa, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Stacked Townhouse Development, 3060 and 3072 Sixth Line, Town of Oakville, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study 2120 Hurontario Street and Grange Drive City of Mississauga, Ontario

REP Atelier 292 OCH Phase 2 Noise Study Page 1 of 26

Transportation Noise & Vibration Assessment Scott Street. Ottawa, Ontario

ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ON THE PROPOSED AVALON CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Burnett Lands Greenbank Road. Noise Impact Feasibility Report

Noise Feasibility Study Framgard Apartments (South Block) NW corner of Britannia Road and Regional Road 25 Town of Milton, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed 4 Storey Apartment Building 226 Woolwich Street South Breslau, Regional Municipality of Waterloo

Environmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 92 Plains Road East

Environmental Noise Assessment Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario

Draft Noise Abatement Guidelines

DRAFT REPORT. Boyne East Catholic Secondary School #3CSS. Noise Impact Study. Louis St. Laurent Avenue, Milton. SACL #SW18060A0 December 11, 2018

Proposed Residential/Institutional Development Independent and Assisted Care Senior s Residence 190 Richmond Road Ottawa, ON K1Z 6W6

Noise Abatement Guidelines. Regional Official Plan Guidelines

R. BOUWMEESTER & ASSOCIATES

1. Introduction Site Noise Impact... 1

Stationary Noise Assessment. 70 Richmond Road. Ottawa, Ontario

23, 33 & 39 DEERFOX DRIVE NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY

Transportation Noise & Vibration Assessment. Medical Council of Canada. Ottawa, Ontario

Environmental Noise Feasibility Assessment Proposed Guelph Woods Development Guelph, ON

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Kemsley Farm St. Thomas, Ontario

Executive Summary. An inspection of the GCP windows indicates that the operable window seals and operable window closure mechanism should be upgraded.

Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario

DRAFT Part 1: ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE CONTROL GUIDELINES FOR LAND USE PLANNING

Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study 2480 Old Bronte Road, Oakville, Ontario

Traffic and Stationary Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Lakeside Village Plaza 5353 Lakeshore Road Burlington, Ontario

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION SITE AND AREA DESCRIPTION...1

Appendix M. Noise Assessment

APPENDIX D EXISTING ROADWAY NOISE, AIR QUALITY AND GROUND VIBRATION ANALYSIS

Appendix F: Noise Report

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed 6-storey Seniors Condominium 7480 Derry Road West Milton, Ontario

Policy for the Assessment and Mitigation of Traffic Noise on County Roads

Transcription:

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT RIVERSIDE SOUTH PHASE 13 CITY OF OTTAWA February 2014 (Revised October 2014) (Revised December 2015) Prepared for: RIVERSIDE SOUTH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 2193 Arch Street Ottawa, Ontario K1G 2H5 Prepared by: J.L. RICHARDS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED Consulting Engineers, Architects & Planners 864 Lady Ellen Place Ottawa, Ontario K1Z 5M2 JLR 21464-13.1

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT RIVERSIDE SOUTH PHASE 13 CITY OF OTTAWA - TABLE OF CONTENTS - PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION... 1 2.1 Future Park and Ride Facility... 1 3.0 TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCE... 2 3.1 Transportation Sound Level Criteria... 2 3.2 Transportation Noise Attenuation Requirements... 3 3.3 Prediction of Noise Levels (Transportation)... 5 3.3.1 Road Traffic Data... 5 3.3.2 Rapid Transit Corridor Data... 6 3.3.3 Noise Level Calculations (Transportation)... 7 3.4 Summary of Findings (Transportation)... 8 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS... 9 4.1 Indoor Noise Control Features... 9 4.1.1 Forced Air Heating System... 9 4.2 Warning Clauses... 9 4.2.1 Warning Clause Type A... 9 4.2.2 Warning Clause Type C... 10 4.3 Site Plan Agreement and Notices on Title... 10 - LIST OF TABLES - TABLE 1 - Outdoor Living Area... 4 TABLE 2 - Plane of Living/Dining Room Window... 4 TABLE 3 - Plane of Sleeping Quarters Window... 4 TABLE 4 - Road Traffic Data to Predict Noise Levels... 6 TABLE 5 - Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Data to Predict Noise Levels... 6 TABLE 6 - Predicted Freefield Noise Levels (Transportation)... 7 TABLE 7 - Minimum Required Control Features/Warning Clauses (Transportation)... 9 JLR 21464-13.1 -i- J.L. Richards & Associates Limited December 2015

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT RIVERSIDE SOUTH PHASE 13 CITY OF OTTAWA TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) - LIST OF FIGURES AND DRAWINGS - FIGURE 1 - Site Location DRAWING NO. 1 - Receiver Locations APPENDIX A - Drawings - LIST OF APPENDICES - APPENDIX B - Transportation Noise Source Predictions - Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Data to Predict Noise Levels - Detailed Predicted Freefield Noise Level Calculations - Transportation Source Predictions JLR 21464-13.1 -ii- J.L. Richards & Associates Limited December 2015

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT RIVERSIDE SOUTH PHASE 13 CITY OF OTTAWA 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Report has been prepared on behalf of Riverside South Development Corporation (RSDC) in order to assess the potential environmental noise impact on the proposed residential development Riverside South Phase 13, due to vehicular traffic on Ralph Hennessy Avenue and due to the bus rapid transit (BRT) corridor. The Study outlines the required noise attenuation measures to satisfy the criteria of the City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Control Guidelines (approved by City Council May 10, 2006). 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The lands subject of this Report, which are shown on Figure 1 and Drawing N1, are described as Riverside South Phase 13, bounded by RSDC Phase 8 to the north, Spratt Road to the west, RSDC commercial core to the east, and the future Transitway-BRT corridor to the south. Phase 13 has an area of approximately 51 ha and will include a total of 390 residential dwelling units (218 Singles, and 172 Townhouses). Noise levels associated with the Transitway-BRT are addressed in this report. Should noise attenuation barriers be required, it is understood from the terms of reference with the City that the City of Ottawa will be responsible for funding such works along the Transitway-BRT at the southern limit of the site. As shown on Drawing N1, a future Park and Ride facility is proposed to be part of Block 267. Refer to Section 2.1 for a discussion regarding this facility. Specific requirements of the Noise Impact Assessment (NIA) (such as construction standards for buildings and fencing) will be incorporated into the City s Site Plan Agreement, where applicable. 2.1 Future Park and Ride Facility A Park and Ride Facility is equivalent to a commercial parking lot and therefore is not subject to the City s guidelines relating to stationary noise source criteria. This interpretation is supported by the recent update to the Provincial regulations, NPC-300 Environmental Noise Guideline: Stationary and Transportation Sources Approval and Planning, which explicitly excludes commuter parking lots from the list of stationary JLR 21464-13.1-1- J.L. Richards & Associates Limited December 2015

SPRATT ROAD CANYON WALK DRIVE LIMEBANK ROAD RIVER ROAD SHORELINE SPRATT ROAD ROAD EARL ARMSTRONG ROAD PORTICO WAY File Location: P:\21000\21464-13 - Riverside South Phase 13\JLR DWG\Civil\21464-13.1 C LOCATION PLAN.dwg PROJECT: DRAWING: RIVERSIDE SOUTH PHASE 13 EARL ARMSTRONG ROAD www.jlrichards.ca SPRATT ROAD RALPH HENNESSY AVENUE RAPID TRANSIT CORRIDOR RIVERSIDE SOUTH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RIVERSIDE SOUTH PHASE 13 4619 SPRATT ROAD LOCATION PLAN This drawing is copyright protected and may not be reproduced or used for purposes other than execution of the described work without the express written consent of J.L. Richards & Associates Limited. DESIGN: DRAWN: CHECKED: CS TB LD JLR NO: FIGURE NO.: 21464-13.1 1

Riverside South Development Corporation Riverside South Phase 13 Noise Impact Assessment sources. In practice, it is the transit terminal itself that may be classified as a stationary noise source as well as the line level traffic on the transitway (i.e., noise source calculations for transit terminals take into account bus movements at a station and not between stations). As detailed information regarding the transit station at the proposed Park and Ride Facility is not available at this time, it is understood that an evaluation will be completed when information is available by the proponent of this facility. As noted, analysis associated with a rapid transit corridor is treated as a transportation noise source and has been addressed in this Report. 3.0 TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCE The transportation noise sources include Ralph Hennessy Avenue, Spratt Road and the future Bus Rapid Transit Corridor. Drawing N1 shows the location of the existing and proposed roadways in relation to the proposed residential development. No rail noise sources are located in close proximity to this site. 3.1 Transportation Sound Level Criteria For the purpose of determining the predicted noise levels, and based on the sound level criteria established by the City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Control Guidelines, the following will be used as the maximum acceptable sound levels (Leq) for residential development and other land uses, such as nursing homes, schools and daycare centres: Receiver Location Criteria Time Period Outdoor living area: Indoor living/dining rooms (inside): General Office, Reception Area (inside): Sleeping Quarters (inside): Sleeping Quarters (outside): 55 dba Daytime (0700-2300 hrs) 45 dba Daytime (0700-2300 hrs) 50 dba Daytime (0700-2300 hrs) 40 dba Nighttime (2300-0700 hrs) 50 dba Nighttime (2300-0700 hrs) Outdoor Living Areas (OLA) are defined as that portion of the outdoor amenity area of a dwelling for the quiet enjoyment of the outdoor environment during the daytime period. Typically, the point of assessment in an OLA is 3.0 m from the building façade and 1.5 m above the ground within the designated OLA for each individual unit and for the townhouse type units with an area greater than 37 m 2. The personal amenity area excludes balconies as per the City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Control Guidelines. Where standard building construction is used that complies with Part 4 of the Ontario Building Code, the indoor noise level should be at least 20 dba below the outdoor level JLR 21464-13.1-2- J.L. Richards & Associates Limited December 2015

Riverside South Development Corporation Riverside South Phase 13 Noise Impact Assessment when the windows are closed, and 10 dba below the outdoor level with the windows open. If the daytime sound levels at the outside walls are no more than 65 dba and the nighttime sound levels at the outside walls containing sleeping quarter windows are no more than 60 dba, then all the indoor requirements could normally be met by constructing the units in accordance with the standards established by the Ontario Building Code. 3.2 Transportation Noise Attenuation Requirements When the sound levels are equal to or less than the specified criteria, no noise attenuation (control) measures are required. When the excess above the recommended sound level limits is between 1 dba and 5 dba for the outdoor sound level criterion, the proposed development can be completed with no noise control measures incorporated into the site, but prospective occupants of the land should be made aware by suitable Warning Clauses. Noise attenuation measures may include any or all of the following: noise attenuation barrier (wall or berm or a berm/wall combination); forced air heating system with provisions for the installation of central air conditioning; central air conditioning; and architectural components designed to provide additional acoustic insulation. In addition to the implementation of noise attenuation features, if required, and depending on the severity of the noise problem, Warning Clauses may be recommended to advise the prospective purchasers/tenants of affected units of the potential environmental noise problem. These Warning Clauses should be included in the Site Plan Agreement and in the Offers of Purchase and Sale, and must be registered on Title. A building component review is required in cases where the noise levels at the building face exceed 65 dba daytime and/or 60 dba nighttime. The Acoustic Insulation Factor Method is to be used in the review, as per the Road and Rail Noise: Effects on Housing manual published by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. JLR 21464-13.1-3- J.L. Richards & Associates Limited December 2015

Riverside South Development Corporation Riverside South Phase 13 Noise Impact Assessment The following tables outline the noise attenuation requirements for the Exterior Walls Containing Sleeping Quarters and/or Living Rooms for the daytime and nighttime periods. Leq (16 hr) (dba) Table 1: Outdoor Living Area (OLA) Daytime (0700-2300) and Nighttime (2300-0700) Ventilation Requirements Outdoor Control Measures Warning Clause Requirements Leq 16 hr 55 dba N/A None required None required 55 dba < Leq 60 dba N/A Control measures (barriers) not required but should be considered Leq > 60 dba N/A Control measures (barriers) required to reduce Leq to below 60 dba and as close to 55 dba as technically, economically and administratively possible Required if resulting Leq exceeds 55 dba Type A Required if resulting Leq exceeds 55 dba Type B Table 2: Plane of Living/Dining Room Window Daytime (0700-2300) and Nighttime (2300-0700) Leq (16 hr) (dba) Ventilation Requirements Outdoor Control Measures Warning Clause Requirements Leq 16 hr 55 dba None required N/A None required 55 dba < Leq 16 hr 65 dba Forced air heating with provision for air conditioning N/A Required Type C Leq 16 hr > 65 dba* Central air conditioning N/A Required Type D * In cases where sound levels exceed 65 dba, building components must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria Table 3: Plane of Sleeping Quarters Window Daytime (0700-2300) and Nighttime (2300-0700) Leq (8 hr) (dba) Ventilation Requirements Outdoor Control Measures Warning Clause Requirements 50 dba < Leq 8 hr 60 dba Forced air heating with provision for central air conditioning N/A Required Type C 60 dba < Leq 8 hr* Central air conditioning N/A Required Type D * In cases where sound levels exceed 60 dba, building components must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria JLR 21464-13.1-4- J.L. Richards & Associates Limited December 2015

Riverside South Development Corporation Riverside South Phase 13 Noise Impact Assessment The wording of the notices to be placed on Title and included in the Site Plan Agreement, as well as the Offers of Purchase and Sale, are provided below: Type A "Purchasers/tenants are advised that noise levels due to increasing road traffic may occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the City s and Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. Type B "Purchasers/tenants are advised that despite the inclusion of noise control features in the development and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing road traffic may on occasions interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound level exceeds the City s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. Type C "This unit has been fitted with a forced air heating system and the ducting, etc. was sized to accommodate central air conditioning. Installation of central air conditioning by the occupant will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the City s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. (Note: The location and installation of the outdoor air conditioning device should be done so as to comply with noise criteria of MOE Publication NPC-216, Residential Air Conditioning Devices and thus minimize the noise impacts both on and in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. Type D "This unit has been supplied with a central air conditioning system which will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the City s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. 3.3 Prediction of Noise Levels (Transportation) 3.3.1 Road Traffic Data The following traffic data was used to predict noise levels: JLR 21464-13.1-5- J.L. Richards & Associates Limited December 2015

Riverside South Development Corporation Riverside South Phase 13 Noise Impact Assessment Table 4: Road Traffic Data to Predict Noise Levels Ralph Hennessy Avenue Spratt Road Total Traffic Volume (AADT) 8,000 24,000 Day/Night Split (%) 92/8 92/8 Medium Trucks (%) 7 7 Heavy Trucks (%) 5 5 Posted Speed (km/hr) 50 60 Road Gradient (%) 1 1 Schedule E of the City of Ottawa Official Plan (May 2003) was utilized to determine the correct road classification and protected right-of-way. These findings were compared to Table 1.7 of the City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Control Guidelines in order to determine an appropriate AADT value. 3.3.2 Rapid Transit Corridor Data Figure 1 and Drawing N1 show the location of the Rapid Transit Corridor in relation to the proposed residential development. The City has classified this corridor as a Bus Rapid Transit Corridor. The following data was used to predict noise levels: Table 5: Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Data to Predict Noise Levels Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Total Traffic Volume (AADT) 258 Day/Night Split (%) 74/26 Medium Trucks (%) 90 Heavy Trucks (%) 10 Posted Speed (km/hr) 80 Road Gradient (%) 1 Appendix B includes a summary of the information provided by the City specific to the Bus Rapid Transit Corridor, including how the AADT value and the day/night split was calculated. Data for the bus rapid transit corridor was confirmed in an email correspondence dated December 16, 2013 with Colin Simpson. JLR 21464-13.1-6- J.L. Richards & Associates Limited December 2015

Riverside South Development Corporation Riverside South Phase 13 Noise Impact Assessment The computer program STAMSON is used to predict noise level associated with the bus rapid transit corridor. According to the City of Ottawa Noise Control Guidelines, bus traffic on dedicated bus transitways is to be entered into the STAMSON program using the Road Template. The Custom Source category Rapid Transit Corridor in the STAMSON model was not used for the purposes of this Report as it utilizes a pre-defined sound emission level (i.e., maximum pass-by sound level measured at a distance of 15 m from the centre of the vehicle path). Based on the fact that STAMSON does not permit an AADT value with a corresponding vehicle per hour count of less than 40, the AADT value inputted for the bus rapid transit corridor was increased by a factor of eight. The noise level prediction output was then reduced by 9 dba (3 dba per doubling). As a result of having to undertake this adjustment, the noise level predictions were undertaken separately for the road traffic and for the bus rapid transit corridor. The nomograph method to add decibel levels was then used to determine a representative total decibel level at the various receivers. These adjustments have been summarized in Appendix B. 3.3.3 Noise Level Calculations (Transportation) The noise levels for the daytime and nighttime periods were calculated for a number of representative receivers described in Table 6 and shown on Drawing N1, using the MOE Road Traffic Noise Computer program STAMSON, Version 5.03. Computer printouts are included in Appendix B. Table 6: Predicted Freefield Noise Levels (Transportation) Noise Levels (dba) Receiver No. and File Names R1 rssp13r1 R2 rssp13r2 R3 rssp13r3 Receiver Description and Location Daytime Nighttime Exterior Wall (front) of Lot 91 fronting on Ralph Hennessy Avenue (also represents Lots 88-100 inclusive & Blocks 207, 247, 248, 270) at a distance of 16.0 m from the centreline of Ralph Hennessy Avenue. Outdoor Living Area of Lot 19 fronting on Street No. 2 (also represents Lots 14, 15, Blocks 237-240, inclusive) at a distance of 26.0 m from the centreline of the future Bus Rapid Transit Corridor. Exterior Wall (rear) of Lot 15 fronting on Street No. 2 (also represents Lots 14, 16; Blocks 237-240, inclusive) at a distance of 29.0 m from the centreline of the future Bus Rapid Transit Corridor. Freefield 63.87 56.40 54.76* 53.57* 54.08* 52.83* JLR 21464-13.1-7- J.L. Richards & Associates Limited December 2015

Riverside South Development Corporation Riverside South Phase 13 Noise Impact Assessment Receiver No. and File Names R3a rsp13r3a R4 rssp13r4 R5 rssp13r5 R6 rssp13r6 R7 rssp13r7 R8 rssp13r8 R9 rssp13r9 R10 rsp13r10 Noise Levels (dba) Receiver Description and Location Daytime Nighttime Exterior Wall (rear) of Lot 13 fronting on Street No. 2 at a distance of 50.5 m from the centreline of the future Bus Rapid Transit Corridor. Outdoor Living Area of Block 250 (First Set of Units Adjacent to BRT) fronting on Street No. 6 at a distance of 54.7 m from the centreline of Ralph Hennessy Avenue and 27.4 m from the centreline of the future Bus Rapid Transit Corridor. Outdoor Living Area of Block 251 fronting on Street No. 6 at a distance of 48.9 m from the centreline of the future Bus Rapid Transit Corridor. Exterior Wall (side) of Block 250 (First Set of Units Adjacent to BRT)fronting on Street No. 6 at a distance of 25.9 m from the centreline of the future Bus Rapid Transit Corridor. Outdoor Living Area of Block 259 (First Set of Units Adjacent to BRT) fronting on Street No. 6 at a distance of 26.9 m from the centreline of the future Bus Rapid Transit Corridor. Exterior Wall (front) of Unit 12 Block 251 fronting on Street No. 6 at a distance of 54.2 m from the centreline of the future Bus Rapid Transit Corridor. Outdoor Living Area of Lot 2 (also represents Lot 1) fronting on Street No. 1 at a distance of 100.6 m from the centreline of Spratt Road and 77.6 m from the future Bus Rapid Transit Corridor. Exterior Wall (rear) of Lot 1 (also represents Lot 2) fronting on Street No. 1 at a distance of 101.7 m from the centreline of Spratt Road and 87.7 m from the future Bus Rapid Transit Corridor. Freefield 49.07* 47.93* 55.02* 53.01* 49.97* 48.97* 54.88* 53.60* 54.31* 53.11* 49.65* 48.56* 57.16* 51.18* 57.21* 50.91* Note (*): Refer to Detailed Predicted Freefield Noise Level Calculations summary sheet in Appendix B for more information A detailed grading plan is not available to be submitted with this report. When the grading plan is available a review of this report may be required. JLR 21464-13.1-8- J.L. Richards & Associates Limited December 2015

Riverside South Development Corporation Riverside South Phase 13 Noise Impact Assessment 3.4 Summary of Findings (Transportation) A summary of the minimum noise requirements and required Warning Clauses is shown on Table 7. The units will require notices to be registered on Title, advising the occupants of the environmental noise problems and/or of the noise attenuation measures being implemented. Table 7: Minimum Required Control Features/Warning Clauses (Transportation) Receiver Location Lots 1, 2, 14-16, 88-100, Blocks 207, 238-240, 247, 248, 250 (First Set of Units Adjacent to BRT), 259 (First Set of Units Adjacent to BRT), 270; inclusive Noise Attenuation Barrier Central Air Conditioning Forced Air Heating Warning Clauses Building Components Study No No Yes A/C No 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Indoor Noise Control Features 4.1.1 Forced Air Heating System The following Units/Lots shall be fitted with forced air heating system, with the provision for the future installation of central air conditioning: Lots 1, 2, 14-16, 88-100; inclusive Blocks 207, 238-240, 247, 248, 250 (First Set of Units Adjacent to BRT), 259 (First Set of Units Adjacent to BRT), 270; inclusive 4.2 Warning Clauses 4.2.1 Warning Clause Type A Clause A is to be registered on Title for Lots 1, 2, 14-16, 88-100, Blocks 207, 238-240, 247, 248, 250 (First Set of Units Adjacent to BRT), 259 (First Set of Units Adjacent to BRT), 270; inclusive: JLR 21464-13.1-9- J.L. Richards & Associates Limited December 2015

A P P E N D I X A DRAWINGS

A P P E N D I X B TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCE PREDICTIONS

APPENDIX 'B' - DETAILED PREDICTED FREEFIELD NOISE LEVEL CALCULATIONS Roadway Rapid Transit Corridor Combined Noise Levels Receiver No. and Receiver Description Noise Levels (dba) Receiver Description Calculated Noise Levels (dba) Adjusted Noise Levels (dba)* Noise Levels (dba) Subtract 9 dba (3 dba per doubling) File Location and Location Daytime Nighttime and Location Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime # to be added** Daytime Nighttime R2 Lot 16 -- -- ola 63.76 62.57 54.76 53.57 -- 54.76 53.57 R3 Lot 15 -- -- ila 63.08 61.83 54.08 52.83 -- 54.08 52.83 R3a Lot 13 -- -- ila 58.07 56.93 49.07 47.93 -- 49.07 47.93 R4 Block 250 49.01 42.02 ola 62.82 61.61 53.82 52.61 1.2/0.4 55.02 53.01 R5 Block 251 -- -- ola 58.97 57.97 49.97 48.97 -- 49.97 48.97 R6 Block 250 -- -- ila 63.88 62.60 54.88 53.60 -- 54.88 53.60 R7 Block 259 -- -- ola 63.31 62.11 54.31 53.11 -- 54.31 53.11 R8 Block 251 -- -- ila 58.65 57.56 49.65 48.56 -- 49.65 48.56 R9 Lot 2 56.86 50.08 ola 54.61 53.77 45.61 44.77 0.3/1.1 57.16 51.18 R10 Lot 1 57.01 50.01 ila 53.93 52.93 44.93 43.93 0.2/0.9 57.21 50.91 Note** Nomograph method from MOE Environmental Noise Assessment in Land Use Planning 1987 Guideline used to add two decibel levels together

Appendix B Rapid Transit Corridor Data to Predict Noise Levels Calculation for Total Traffic Volume (AADT) and Day/Night Split The following information was provided by Colin Simpson in an email dated September 23, 2011: 5 minute headways should be assumed in each direction using 60 articulated buses with 30 minute headways between 2am and 5am for the night-time Leq dba calculations. This information was utilized in the following calculation: Daytime: 16 hrs = 192 buses Nighttime: 8 hrs = 5x12 = 60 buses plus 3 x 2 = 66 buses Total = 192 + 66 = 258 buses Therefore, 74% 26% split Speed Limit In an email dated September 28, 2011, Colin Simpson indicated that a speed limit of 80 km/hr for the bus rapid transit corridor should be assumed. Medium/Heavy Truck Percentages A medium/heavy truck ratio of 90/10 was utilized as STAMSON does not permit an input of 100% medium truck traffic.

From: Kate Whitfield To: Colin Simpson Date: 12/16/2013 3:14 PM Subject: RE: Data for Bus Rapid Transit Corridor - Riverside South Phase 13 Thank you for this. Phase 13 is actually tucked closer to the future bus rapid transitway and not up against Earl Armstrong so we are probably only in the position to apply one scenario. This information is helpful though as we move forward. Regards, Kate >>> "Simpson, Colin" <Colin.Simpson@ottawa.ca> 12/16/2013 1:56 PM >>> Hi Kate, sorry for my delay in getting back to you. Yes, the data inputs I gave you back in 2011 associated with the rapid transit corridor near River Road and Earl Armstrong are still valid. This corridor hasn t changed in the 2013 TMP compared to the 2008 TMP: http://ottawa.ca/sites/ottawa.ca/files/tmpmap1_rapid_transit.pdf What has changed is a new affordable rapid transit plan which calls for interim Transit Priority buses on Earl Armstrong as shown in the following link: http://ottawa.ca/sites/ottawa.ca/files/tmpmap2_rapid_ttpn.pdf For your purposes, you should consider both scenarios. The inputs for the ultimate rapid transit corridor that I gave you last time and also and the interim plan to have a high frequency of buses on Earl Armstrong. For the interim plan, you could just model Earl Armstrong to have a higher than normal heavy vehicle composition to account for the buses. I recall the default STAMSON model to include 5% heavy vehicles. You may want to up than to 7% or something justifiable to account for the buses. Earl Armstrong will likely become a truck route after it is extended to Bank Street with its new bridge over the Rideau River anyway. The affordable plan is what is expected to be in place in the year 2031 while there is no time frame for the full network concept accept that it is likely beyond 2031 which is why it would be good to consider both scenarios for noise purposes. You can give me a call if you want to discuss further. Regards, - cs Colin Simpson, MCIP RPP Senior Project Manager, Transportation - Strategic Planning Unit Planning and Growth Management Department City of Ottawa, 110 Laurier Ave West, 4th Floor, K1P 1J1 Fax: (613) 580-2578 Tel: (613) 580-2424 ext. 27881 colin.simpson@ottawa.ca From: Kate Whitfield [mailto:kwhitfield@jlrichards.ca] Sent: December 10, 2013 1:33 PM To: Simpson, Colin Subject: Data for Bus Rapid Transit Corridor - Riverside South Phase 13 Good afternoon, In Sept 2011, you helped me with some data associated with the rapid transit corridor near Riverside South Phase 9 (i.e., in the River Road / Earl Armstrong area) for a noise study. You indicated "5 minute headways should be assumed in each direction using 60' articulated buses with 30 min headways between 2am and 5am for the night-time Leq dba calculations." You also said that we should assume a speed limit of 80 km/hr for the bus rapid transit corridor. We are now working on a noise study for Phase 13. Can you please confirm whether or not this data is still correct? Regards, Kate Kate Whitfield, MCIP, RPP, P. Eng., LEED-AP Planner/ Civil Engineer J.L. Richards & Associates Limited 864 Lady Ellen Place, Ottawa, ON K1Z 5M2 Tel: 613-728-3571 Fax: 613-728-6012

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 08-12-2015 15:44:42 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: rssp13r1.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Riverside South Phase 13 r1 ila Road data, segment # 1: ralph hennes (day/night) ------------------------------------------------ Car traffic volume : 6477/563 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 515/45 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 368/32 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 8000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: ralph hennes (day/night) ---------------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 16.00 / 16.00 m Receiver height : 2.25 / 4.25 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: ralph hennes (day) --------------------------------------- Source height = 1.50 m ROAD (0.00 + 63.87 + 0.00) = 63.87 dba -90 90 0.64 65.75 0.00-0.46-1.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 63.87 Segment Leq : 63.87 dba

Total Leq All Segments: 63.87 dba Results segment # 1: ralph hennes (night) ----------------------------------------- Source height = 1.50 m ROAD (0.00 + 56.40 + 0.00) = 56.40 dba -90 90 0.58 58.16 0.00-0.44-1.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.40 Segment Leq : 56.40 dba Total Leq All Segments: 56.40 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 63.87 (NIGHT): 56.40 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 08-12-2015 15:40:51 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: rssp13r2.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Riverside South Phase 13 r2 ola Road data, segment # 1: brt (day/night) --------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 0/0 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1375/483 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 153/54 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 80 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 2064 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 90.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 10.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 74.00

Data for Segment # 1: brt (day/night) ------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 26.00 / 26.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.25 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: brt (day) ------------------------------ Source height = 1.78 m ROAD (0.00 + 63.76 + 0.00) = 63.76 dba -90 90 0.65 69.15 0.00-3.95-1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 63.76 Segment Leq : 63.76 dba Total Leq All Segments: 63.76 dba Results segment # 1: brt (night) -------------------------------- Source height = 1.78 m ROAD (0.00 + 62.57 + 0.00) = 62.57 dba -90 90 0.57 67.62 0.00-3.75-1.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 62.57 Segment Leq : 62.57 dba Total Leq All Segments: 62.57 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 63.76 (NIGHT): 62.57

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 08-12-2015 15:42:36 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: rssp13r3.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Riverside South Phase 13 r3 ila Road data, segment # 1: brt (day/night) --------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 0/0 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1375/483 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 153/54 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 80 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 2064 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 90.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 10.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 74.00 Data for Segment # 1: brt (day/night) ------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 29.00 / 29.00 m Receiver height : 2.25 / 4.25 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: brt (day) ------------------------------ Source height = 1.78 m ROAD (0.00 + 63.08 + 0.00) = 63.08 dba -90 90 0.63 69.15 0.00-4.66-1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 63.08 Segment Leq : 63.08 dba

Total Leq All Segments: 63.08 dba Results segment # 1: brt (night) -------------------------------- Source height = 1.78 m ROAD (0.00 + 61.83 + 0.00) = 61.83 dba -90 90 0.57 67.62 0.00-4.49-1.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.83 Segment Leq : 61.83 dba Total Leq All Segments: 61.83 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 63.08 (NIGHT): 61.83 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 09-12-2015 08:10:25 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: rsp13r3a.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Riverside South Phase 13 r3a ila brt Road data, segment # 1: brt (day/night) --------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 0/0 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1375/483 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 153/54 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 80 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 2064 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 90.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 10.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 74.00

Data for Segment # 1: brt (day/night) ------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 38.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 50.50 / 50.50 m Receiver height : 2.25 / 4.25 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: brt (day) ------------------------------ Source height = 1.78 m ROAD (0.00 + 58.07 + 0.00) = 58.07 dba -90 38 0.63 69.15 0.00-8.59-2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 58.07 Segment Leq : 58.07 dba Total Leq All Segments: 58.07 dba Results segment # 1: brt (night) -------------------------------- Source height = 1.78 m ROAD (0.00 + 56.93 + 0.00) = 56.93 dba -90 38 0.57 67.62 0.00-8.27-2.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.93 Segment Leq : 56.93 dba Total Leq All Segments: 56.93 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 58.07 (NIGHT): 56.93

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 08-12-2015 15:49:35 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: rssp13r4.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Riverside South Phase 13 r4 ola Road data, segment # 1: ralph hennes (day/night) ------------------------------------------------ Car traffic volume : 6477/563 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 515/45 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 368/32 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 8000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: ralph hennes (day/night) ---------------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 1 / 1 House density : 80 % Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 54.70 / 54.70 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.25 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: ralph hennes (day) --------------------------------------- Source height = 1.50 m ROAD (0.00 + 49.01 + 0.00) = 49.01 dba -90 90 0.66 65.75 0.00-9.33-1.46 0.00-5.95 0.00 49.01

Segment Leq : 49.01 dba Total Leq All Segments: 49.01 dba Results segment # 1: ralph hennes (night) ----------------------------------------- Source height = 1.50 m ROAD (0.00 + 42.02 + 0.00) = 42.02 dba -90 90 0.58 58.16 0.00-8.86-1.32 0.00-5.95 0.00 42.02 Segment Leq : 42.02 dba Total Leq All Segments: 42.02 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 49.01 (NIGHT): 42.02 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 08-12-2015 15:53:10 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: rsp13r4a.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Riverside South Phase 13 r4 ola brt Road data, segment # 1: brt (day/night) --------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 0/0 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1375/483 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 153/54 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 80 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 2064 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 90.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 10.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 74.00

Data for Segment # 1: brt (day/night) ------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -54.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 27.40 / 27.40 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.25 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: brt (day) ------------------------------ Source height = 1.78 m ROAD (0.00 + 62.82 + 0.00) = 62.82 dba -54 90 0.65 69.15 0.00-4.32-2.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 62.82 Segment Leq : 62.82 dba Total Leq All Segments: 62.82 dba Results segment # 1: brt (night) -------------------------------- Source height = 1.78 m ROAD (0.00 + 61.61 + 0.00) = 61.61 dba -54 90 0.57 67.62 0.00-4.11-1.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.61 Segment Leq : 61.61 dba Total Leq All Segments: 61.61 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 62.82 (NIGHT): 61.61

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 08-12-2015 15:57:21 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: rssp13r5.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Riverside South Phase 13 r5 ola brt Road data, segment # 1: brt (day/night) --------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 0/0 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1375/483 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 153/54 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 80 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 2064 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 90.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 10.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 74.00 Data for Segment # 1: brt (day/night) ------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -71.00 deg 80.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 48.90 / 48.90 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.25 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: brt (day) ------------------------------ Source height = 1.78 m ROAD (0.00 + 58.97 + 0.00) = 58.97 dba -71 80 0.65 69.15 0.00-8.48-1.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 58.97 Segment Leq : 58.97 dba

Total Leq All Segments: 58.97 dba Results segment # 1: brt (night) -------------------------------- Source height = 1.78 m ROAD (0.00 + 57.97 + 0.00) = 57.97 dba -71 80 0.57 67.62 0.00-8.05-1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.97 Segment Leq : 57.97 dba Total Leq All Segments: 57.97 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 58.97 (NIGHT): 57.97 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 08-12-2015 16:00:15 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: rssp13r6.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Riverside South Phase 13 r6 ila brt Road data, segment # 1: brt (day/night) --------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 0/0 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1375/483 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 153/54 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 80 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 2064 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 90.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 10.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 74.00

Data for Segment # 1: brt (day/night) ------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 25.90 / 25.90 m Receiver height : 2.25 / 4.25 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: brt (day) ------------------------------ Source height = 1.78 m ROAD (0.00 + 63.88 + 0.00) = 63.88 dba -90 90 0.63 69.15 0.00-3.86-1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 63.88 Segment Leq : 63.88 dba Total Leq All Segments: 63.88 dba Results segment # 1: brt (night) -------------------------------- Source height = 1.78 m ROAD (0.00 + 62.60 + 0.00) = 62.60 dba -90 90 0.57 67.62 0.00-3.72-1.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 62.60 Segment Leq : 62.60 dba Total Leq All Segments: 62.60 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 63.88 (NIGHT): 62.60

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 09-12-2015 08:23:20 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: rssp13r7.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Riverside South Phase 13 r7 ola brt Road data, segment # 1: brt (day/night) --------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 0/0 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1375/483 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 153/54 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 80 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 2064 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 90.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 10.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 74.00 Data for Segment # 1: brt (day/night) ------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -70.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 26.90 / 26.90 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.25 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: brt (day) ------------------------------ Source height = 1.78 m ROAD (0.00 + 63.31 + 0.00) = 63.31 dba -70 90 0.65 69.15 0.00-4.19-1.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 63.31 Segment Leq : 63.31 dba

Total Leq All Segments: 63.31 dba Results segment # 1: brt (night) -------------------------------- Source height = 1.78 m ROAD (0.00 + 62.11 + 0.00) = 62.11 dba -70 90 0.57 67.62 0.00-3.98-1.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 62.11 Segment Leq : 62.11 dba Total Leq All Segments: 62.11 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 63.31 (NIGHT): 62.11 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 08-12-2015 16:10:22 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: rssp13r8.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Riverside South Phase 13 r8 ila brt Road data, segment # 1: brt (day/night) --------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 0/0 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1375/483 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 153/54 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 80 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 2064 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 90.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 10.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 74.00

Data for Segment # 1: brt (day/night) ------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 54.20 / 54.20 m Receiver height : 2.25 / 4.25 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: brt (day) ------------------------------ Source height = 1.78 m ROAD (0.00 + 58.65 + 0.00) = 58.65 dba -90 90 0.63 69.15 0.00-9.09-1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 58.65 Segment Leq : 58.65 dba Total Leq All Segments: 58.65 dba Results segment # 1: brt (night) -------------------------------- Source height = 1.78 m ROAD (0.00 + 57.56 + 0.00) = 57.56 dba -90 90 0.57 67.62 0.00-8.75-1.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.56 Segment Leq : 57.56 dba Total Leq All Segments: 57.56 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 58.65 (NIGHT): 57.56